Motivation & Applications ExperimentalResults Completed ... · PDF fileT n and M n are the...

Tn andMn arethevaluesofT andM atthen-th bin

Experimental ResultsMotivation&Applications

CompletedLocalDerivativePatternforRotationInvariantTextureClassificationYutingHu,ZhilingLong,andGhassanAlRegibMultimediaandSensorsLab(MSL)atGeorgiaTech

GeorgiaInstituteofTechnology,Atlanta,GA30332-0250,USA{huyuting,zhiling.long,alregib}@gatech.edu

LocalBinaryPattern(LBP)

ProposedMethodOverview

CompletedLocalDerivativePattern(CLDP)

CLDPHistogramGeneration

CLDPHistogram-basedClassification

•CircularSignPattern

•CircularMagnitudePattern

•DirectionalDerivativePattern

•GlobalSignPattern

Sign

MagnitudeThresholdingFunction

• GroupingStrategyRotation-invariantanduniform-2(“riu2”)forp =8

certainsmoothness:1(notsmooth)0(smooth)

:theglobalmeanof

:theglobalmeanof

“_”:ConcatenatedHistogram“/”:JointHistogram

Chi-squaredistancebetweenhistogramT andM :

Nearestneighborclassifier(NNC):Theclasslabelofatestimageisdeterminedbythetrainingimagethathastheminimalchi-squaredistancetothetestimage.

Applications:Rotation-invarianttextureclassification,textureretrieval,andtexturesegmentation

Motivation:Todefineamoredistinctiveandefficientlocaldescriptor thatcandescribethedirectionalvariationofthelocaldifferencesoftwoscales.

ClassificationAccuracy(%)

(P,R)(8,2) (8,3) (16,2) (8,3) (24,2) (24,3)

CLBP_S 77.67 80.94 82.40 85.89 84.07 87.04CLDP_S/D 86.01 90.69 89.44 92.03 90.18 92.55∆ (Accuracy) 8.34 9.75 7.04 6.14 6.11 5.51

CLBP_M 75.45 79.32 79.96 84.35 80.35 85.12CLDP_M/D 81.81 84.46 84.88 88.56 84.80 89.24∆ (Accuracy) 6.36 5.14 4.92 4.21 4.45 4.12

CLBP_M/C 88.03 88.37 91.79 92.36 91.47 93.15CLDP_M/D/C 91.48 91.42 92.83 94.39 92.37 94.57∆ (Accuracy) 3.45 3.05 1.04 2.03 0.90 1.42

CLBP_S_M/C 92.11 92.31 93.41 94.52 93.51 94.94CLDP_S_D_M/C 92.40 93.87 93.68 95.24 93.69 95.35∆ (Accuracy) 0.29 1.56 0.27 0.72 0.18 0.41

CLBP_S/M 92.66 94.54 93.24 95.00 93.40 95.40CLDP_S/M/D 94.87 96.43 95.07 96.26 93.67 95.59∆ (Accuracy) 2.21 1.89 1.83 1.26 0.27 0.10

CLBP_S/M/C 95.41 96.08 95.44 96.16 95.19 96.28CLDP_S/M/D/C 96.29 97.14 96.25 96.45 94.94 95.97∆ (Accuracy) 0.88 1.06 0.81 0.29 -0.25 -0.31

• Average classification accuracy (%) of CLBP and CLDP on TC10 (“inca”)and TC12 (“t184” and “horizon”) using different combination schemes

• Classification accuracy (%) of state-of-the-art texture descriptors onTC10 (“inca”) and TC12 (“t184” and “horizon”)ClassificationAccuracy(%)

TC10INCA

TC12T184 Horizon Average

CLBP 99.30 95.32 94.54 94.93DLBP+NGF 99.10 93.20 90.40 91.80PRICoLBPg 94.48 92.57 92.50 92.54LDDP 97.89 95.30 93.40 94.35CLBC 98.80 94.00 94.07 94.04

DNS+LBP(24,3) 99.27 94.40 93.85 93.63PLBP_C 98.95 95.32 94.95 95.14NTLBP 99.24 96.18 94.28 95.23

CLBP_S/M/C(8,1)+(16,2)+(24,3) 99.14 95.18 95.55 95.37

LDDP_1/2(8,1)+(16,2)+(24,3) 98.64 95.90 94.16 95.08

CLBC_S/M/C(8,1)+(16,2)+(24,3) 99.38 94.98 95.51 95.25

MSJ-LBP 96.53 94.95 96.34 95.65pi-LBP 99.17 95.72 94.54 95.13pi-LBP/C 98.96 97.36 97.11 97.24

CLDP(Proposed) 99.32 96.55 95.63 96.09

http://www2.ece.gatech.edu/research/labs/msl/