View
220
Download
2
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Mirror Results Mirror Results PresentationPresentation
AKA Let’s PartY, PartXAKA Let’s PartY, PartX
Review of GoalsReview of Goals• Figure out spring arrangement to limit
mirror deflection to 10 nm = 1e-8 m– Target Axial Distortion ± 1e-8 m
• X direction (Axial Direction) is 100 times as important as Y direction.
Best Uniform SolutionBest Uniform Solution• Optimal Spring Geometry:
– 20 rows of springs, evenly spaced
– 10 springs per row, evenly spaced
– Spring constant 1 N/m
• Max distortion – 72.75e-6 m• Axial distortion – ±43.8e-8 m• RMS of the dx – 0.285676
arcseconds• Uses standard coil springs on
the foam base
Fully Optimized SolutionFully Optimized Solution• Optimal Spring Geometry:
– 22 rows of springs placed at angles 21 springs per row, evenly spaced
– Spring constant 0.2 N/m
• Max distortion– 2.4227e-6 m• Axial distortion– ± 2.09e-8 m
• RMS of the dx – 0.812209 arcseconds
• Uses standard coil springs on the foam base
The Angles (in Degrees)The Angles (in Degrees)Thanks, MATLAB! Thanks, MATLAB!
[0.03, 0.8889, 4.2365, 7.2313, 11.9344, 11.9955, 15.9555, 16.1586, 16.4575, 16.4934, 22.2276, 23.4992]
Axial DeformationAxial Deformation
Same Angles, Springs w/ AreaSame Angles, Springs w/ Area
How we optimizedHow we optimized• Used the MATLAB/COMSOL interface to
generate a script• Performed a parameter search to find the
optimal evenly spaced spring solution• Used these values to generate a
simulation that optimized row location• Iteratively checked for improvements in dx
RMS
How we optimized (cont’d)How we optimized (cont’d)
dΘ
1) MeasureSlope
2) Move Spring Position
3) Overshot, Move Back
4) Take a smaller step
5) Arrive at correct value
Steps Towards a Viable Steps Towards a Viable SolutionSolution
• Optimized spring angle values = exact• Real spring placement ≠ exact
– Placement error ~ 5e-4 m
• Rounding:– 4 nearly coincident rows – double K?
Offset springs along axis?
• Rounded RMS is 2.92e-9 m off optimal
This one’s for you, Mike
Recommended