Migration velocity analysis by recursive wavefield extrapolation

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Migration velocity analysis by recursive wavefield

extrapolation

Paul Sava & Biondo BiondiStanford University

SEP

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Motivation

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Wave-equation MVA (WEMVA)

• Band-limited• Multi-pathing• Resolution

• Born approximation– small anomaly

• Rytov approximation– phase unwrapping

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Wave-equation MVA (WEMVA)

• WE tomography– data space

• WE MVA– image space

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Outline

1. WEMVA overview

2. Born image perturbation

3. Differential image perturbation

4. Example

paul@sep.stanford.edu

A tomography problem

sqs LΔminΔTraveltime

MVA

Wave-equation tomography

Wave-equation MVA

q t traveltime

d

data

Rimage

L ray field wavefield wavefield

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Δss0

sii 0seW U

WEMVA: main idea

0WWWΔ

0s

0s0 eW iU

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Born approximation 1eWΔW Δs

0 i

ΔsWΔW 0 i

iei 1

ie

sR LΔ

paul@sep.stanford.edu

WEMVA: objective function

slowness perturbation

image perturbation

slownessperturbation(unknown)

Linear WEMVAoperator

imageperturbation

(known)

sRs LΔminΔ

paul@sep.stanford.edu

WEMVA: objective function

sRs LΔminΔ

Traveltime

MVA

Wave-equation tomography

Wave-equation MVA

t d R

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Fat ray: GOM example

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Outline

1. WEMVA overview

2. Born image perturbation

3. Differential image perturbation

4. Example

paul@sep.stanford.edu

“Data” estimate

Traveltime

MVA

Wave-equation tomography

Wave-equation MVA

t d Rray

tracing

data

modeling

residual

migration

sRs LΔminΔ

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Prestack Stolt residual migration

• Background image R0

• Velocity ratio 0RSR

RR0

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Prestack Stolt residual migration

0RRR • Image perturbation

RR0

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Born approximation

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Residual migration: the problem

Correct velocity Incorrect velocity

Zero offset image

Angle gathers

Zero offset image

Angle gathers

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Born approximation

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Outline

1. WEMVA overview

2. Born image perturbation

3. Differential image perturbation

4. Example

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Differential image perturbation

0

1

ˆ Rd

dSR

00 RRSR Image

difference

Image differential

Computed Measured

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Differential image perturbation

R

R

0

1

ˆ Rd

dSR

00 RRSR

R

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Phase perturbation

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Differential image perturbation

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Born approximation

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Example: background image

Zero offset image

Angle gathers

Background image

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Example: differential image

Zero offset image

Angle gathers

Differential image

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Example: slowness inversion

Slowness perturbation

Image perturbation

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Example: updated image

Updated slowness

Updated image

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Example: correct image

Correct slowness

Correct image

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Outline

1. WEMVA overview

2. Born image perturbation

3. Differential image perturbation

4. Example

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Field data example

• North Sea– Salt environment– Subset

– One non-linear iteration• Migration (background image)

• Residual migration (image perturbation)

• Slowness inversion (slowness perturbation)

• Slowness update (updated slowness)

• Re-migration (updated image)

location

dep

th

paul@sep.stanford.edu

location

dep

thde

pth

paul@sep.stanford.edu

dep

th

velocity ratio velocity ratio

paul@sep.stanford.edu

1

1

1

location

dep

thde

pth

paul@sep.stanford.edu

location

dep

th

location

paul@sep.stanford.edu

location

dep

th

location

paul@sep.stanford.edu

location

dep

thde

pth

paul@sep.stanford.edu

location

dep

thde

pth

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Summary

• MVA– Wavefield extrapolation methods– Born linearization– Differential image perturbations

• Key points– Band-limited (sharp velocity contrasts)– Multi-pathing (complicated wavefields)– Resolution (frequency redundancy)

paul@sep.stanford.edu

paul@sep.stanford.edu

MVA information (a)Traveltime MVA Wave-equation MVA

• Offset focusing (flat ADCIG) • Offset focusing (flat ADCIG)

z

z

xx

paul@sep.stanford.edu

MVA information (b)Traveltime MVA Wave-equation MVA

• Offset focusing (flat ADCIG) • Offset focusing (flat ADCIG)

• Spatial focusing

z

z

xx

paul@sep.stanford.edu

MVA information (c)Traveltime MVA Wave-equation MVA

• Offset focusing (flat ADCIG) • Offset focusing (flat ADCIG)

• Spatial focusing

• Frequency redundancy

low high

paul@sep.stanford.edu

low high

WEMVA cost reduction

• Full image– Offset focusing

– Spatial focusing

– Frequency

• Normal incidence image

– Spatial focusing

– “fat” rays

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Another example

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Example: correct model

Zero offset image

Angle gathers

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Example: background model

Zero offset image

Angle gathers

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Example: correct perturbation

Zero offset image

Angle gathers

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Example: differential perturbation

Zero offset image

Angle gathers

1d

dRR

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Example: perturbations comparison

Differential

Difference

Correct

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Example: differential perturbation

Zero offset image

Angle gathers

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Example: difference perturbation

Zero offset image

Angle gathers

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Example: updated model

Zero offset image

Angle gathers

paul@sep.stanford.edu

Example: correct model

Zero offset image

Angle gathers