View
215
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
MEDIAN STUDENT GROWTH ANALYSIS
December 2014
Center for Educational Effectiveness: Greg Lobdell
Office of Student and School Success, OSPI: Sue Cohn
www.k12.wa.us/assessment/StudentGrowth.aspx
OSPI Student Growth Percentile Training
1. Review the OSPI SGP Website2. Open your school’s CEE
Median Student Growth Analysis – Section 2
3. Open your Student and School Success Action-Planning Handbook: Data Reflection Protocol – State Assessments (Appendix B.4)
Before We Begin
You will use these during this short presentation.
Data Reflection Protocol
Understanding Median Student Growth Analysis
What the data can tell us andquestions to consider
Next Steps with your teams Contact Information
“Pause and reflect”: When you see these in the PPT, you can pause this presentation to reflect on what you see in your data!
Bill Wagner / The Daily NewsMonticello “Success Night”
AgendaIntended Audience: Superintendents, Principals,
Leadership Teams, Success Coaches, and Educational Service District Leaders
Before beginning your review of these data, please reflect on your preliminary thoughts aboutstudents’ growth in your school.
One or more of the following thought-starters may be helpful.
– I assume…– I predict…– I wonder…– My questions/expectations are influenced by…
See Appendix B.3 in the Action Planning Handbook, or, National School Reform Website at: http://www.nsrfharmony.org/free-resources/protocols/a-z
Pause and Reflect #1
Action-Planning Process
• Section 2 of the Student Performance data in the Comprehensive Data Package and Services
Median Student Growth Analysis
• Student Growth Percentile or SGP: Describes a student’s growth compared to other students with similar prior test scores (“academic peers”)– E.g. Student-A: SGP=64 and Student-B: SGP=37
• Compared with students with similar past scores, Student-A grew more than 64% of the students in the state
• Compared with students with similar past scores, Student-B grew more than 37 percent of the students (or 63% of the students grew more than Student-B).
Student Growth Percentile - Refresher
• The Median (middle) of all students in your school at this grade level and content area
• Summarizes SGPs by district, school, grade level, etc.• E.g. Consider a school with 7 students in a grade
Median SGP - Refresher
Student SGP
Student-A 23
Student-B 28
Student-C 34
Student-D 45
Student-E 54
Student-F 76
Student-G 84
Median SGP for this school in this grade is 45.
3 students above and 3 students below
Each page contains 4 sets of charts• All Students
• Students with Disabilities
• ELL Students
• Low Income Students
Median Student Growth Analysis: Page Layout
• Median SGP for School and District for 4 years– Shows your school
and your district• Percentage of
students showing High, Typical, and Low Growth
Median SGP Data Presented in 2 Ways
46
36 37
60
48 48 46
50
0102030405060708090
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
Median Student Growth PercentileGrade 5: Reading | Low-Income Students
ABC Elem ABC School District
Copyright © Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc., 2014.
32%44% 46%
33%
45%
42%27%
29%
23%15%
27%39%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2011 2012 2013 2014
Growth ProfileGrade 5: Reading | Low-Income Students
Low Typical High
Copyright © Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc., 2014.
• Data are missing for MSP, HSPE, and EOC if…– Number of students assessed is < 10– Data are suppressed (“Enhanced Suppression”). In
July 2014, OSPI implemented a process to suppress data in certain cases even if count is > 10 students.
• Schools participating in the Smarter Balanced Assessment pilot testing in spring of 2014 won’t have MSP data in Reading and Math for grades 3-8.
“Missing data” in Charts
School’s data are missing for the entire subgroup; school probably has less than 10 students in each year.
Missing Data Example - Missing Subgroup
#N/A
#N/A
47
66
38 40 41
45
0102030405060708090
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
Median Student Growth PercentileGrade 4: Reading | ELL Students
ABC Elem ABC School District
Copyright © Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc., 2014.
Data are missing for 2011 and 2012 in the ELL group; school probably had less than 10 students in those years and population is now growing.
Missing Data Example: Data for Some Years
• Look at the top charts on each page of your report.
• Across the 4 years, do you see improvement? Declines in the data? Or are data staying flat?
• Are there differences between Reading and Math?
• What else do you need to know?
Pause and Reflect #2
• Strong (positive) improvement over time
Interpretation Hint: Evidence of Improvement
50
60
73
80
62
53
57
46
0102030405060708090
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
Median Student Growth PercentileGrade 5: Math
ABC Elem ABC School District
Copyright © Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc., 2014.
31% 32%
13% 7%
44%32%
30%34%
24%36%
57% 59%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
2011 2012 2013 2014
Growth ProfileGrade 5: Math
Low Typical High
Copyright © Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc., 2014.
• Increase in the percentage of students showing high growth
• Significant decrease in percentage of students showing low growth
Interpretation Hint: Evidence of Gap Closure
48 51 53 55
55
45
51 530
102030405060708090
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
Median Student Growth PercentileGrade 4: Reading
ABC Elem ABC School District
Copyright © Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc., 2014.
41
55
61
68
38 40 41
45
0102030405060708090
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
Median Student Growth PercentileGrade 4: Reading | ELL Students
ABC Elem ABC School District
Copyright © Center for Educational Effectiveness, Inc., 2014.
• ALL STUDENTS chart shows acceptable growth (around 50 median SGP)
• ELLs show strong improvement in growth; this implies significant gap closure since they show higher growth.
All Students ELLs
• Look within each page of your report.
• What evidence do you see of gaps closing in your school?
• What else do you need to know?
Pause and Reflect #3
TriangulationSection 1: ProficiencyAre students getting to proficiency? Are we shrinking the percentage at Level-1?
Section 2: GrowthAre students growing? Are ELL, SWD, or Low-income subgroups catching up?
Section 3: ELLAre ELLs reaching English proficiency? What do we see with Former-ELLs?
Data around:– School and district strengths– Evidence-based programs and
services– Barriers
See Student and School Success Action-Planning Handbook
Deepening Your Understanding
Next Steps
Incorporating Perceptual Data in Data Reflection Protocol
Perceptual Data
Next Steps
• OSPI Student Growth Percentile Training: www.k12.wa.us/assessment/StudentGrowth.aspx
• Office of Student and School Success
(360) 725-4960 or www.k12.wa.us/StudentAndSchoolSuccess
Andy Kelly: andrew.kelly@k12.wa.us
Travis Campbell: travis.campbell@k12.wa.us
Craig Shurick: craig.shurick@k12.wa.us
Sue Cohn: sue.cohn@k12.wa.us
• Center for Educational Effectiveness Greg Lobdell: Data analysis & data usage: greg@effectiveness.org Jennifer Jones: Operations and Report Delivery: jennifer@effectiveness.org
Contact Information
Recommended