View
216
Download
1
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
MDOT
Fiscal Year 2016
Construction Contracting Statistics
CONTRACT SERVICES DIVISION
January 26, 2017
MDOT
FY 2016 Letting Statistics
INDEX
Construction Contract Activity
Distribution of Letting and Projects
Top 10 Work Type Classifications and Prime Contractors
Distribution of Prequalified Contractors by Financial Rating
Projects Let by Program Area
Project Dollars Let by Program Area
Accuracy of Engineer’s Estimates – Projects Let
Accuracy of Engineer’s Estimates – Projects Awarded
Development of Design Plans – Number and Dollars
Unbalanced Bid Review
Distribution of Contract Bidding by Region
FY 2017 Project Projections
Contract Services Accomplishments and Future Goals 2
FY 2016 MDOT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ACTIVITY BID LETTING FY 2016 FY 2015STATS Number of Lettings: 26 26
Projects Let: 742 805Eng. Est: $1.39 billion $1.29 billionLow Bid Total: $1.29 billion $1.35 billionBids Received: 2,900 2,969Individual Bidders-Bids Received: 236 251
STATE TRUNKLINE FY 2016 FY 2015STATS (proj Let) 309 projects, 41.6% overall 277 projects, 34.4% overall
$879.1 million, or 68.1% overall $874.15 million, or 66.25% overall
PROGRAM AREA STATS2016 429 Local, 2 Aeronautics, 2 Freight Services, or 58.4% of the 742 projects Let
$ 411.1 million in low bid dollars, a decrease of 7.68% from low bid dollars of FY 2015
2015 490 Local, 35 Aeronautics, 3 Freight Services, or 65.6% of the 805 projects Let$445.3 million in low bid dollars
PROJECTS UNSUCCESSFUL FOR AWARD
Low Bid Rejection/Appeal Low Bid Withdrawals No Bids Received Not Considered Bids All Bids Rejected2016 1 0 0 5 20 (9 Trunkline)2015 2 2 3 7 41 (18 Trunkline)
PREQUALIFICATION FY 2016 FY 2015Number of Prequalified Contractors 662 680
CONTRACTSNumber – Contracts Awarded 749 756Contract Total $1.19 billion $1.20 billionTop 10 Contracts 57.9% of total dollars 60.3% of total dollars
PAYMENTSPayment Estimates 10,957 11,772Dollars Paid $1.26 billion $1.31 billion
3
DISTRIBUTION OF LETTINGS AND PROJECTS
OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP
Projects per Month 29 24 46 69 63 82 77 120 83 65 57 27
Lettings per Month 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 1 2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Nu
mb
er o
f P
roje
cts
Nu
mb
er o
f Le
ttin
gs
26 lettings were held FY 2016
Number of projects ranged per letting from 1 to 1164
TOP 10 WORK TYPE CLASSIFICATIONSNumber of Prequalified Contractors
WORK CLASSIFICATION
NUMBER OF PREQUALIFIED CONTRACTORS
WORK TYPE DESCRIPTION
Ea 281 Grading, Drainage Structures, and Aggregate Construction
K 217 Sewers and Watermains
J 186 Miscellaneous Concrete Items
I 177 Seeding and Sodding/Turf Establishment
N2 164 Clearing
G 101 Building Moving and Demolition
Ba 97 Concrete Pavement Patching and Widening
Fa 93 Bridges and Special Structures
Fd 80 Pump Stations
Cb 79 Plant-Mixed Hot Mix Asphalt/ Bituminous Paving
5
TOP 10 PRIME CONTRACTORS Awarded Contracts
FY 2016 FY 2015Awarded Contractor Awarded Amount Awarded Contractor Awarded Amount
Dan's Excavating, Inc. $214,680,347.83 Dan's Excavating, Inc. $240,467,261.30
Rieth-Riley Construction Co., Inc. $127,335,003.12 Rieth-Riley Construction Co., Inc. $80,500,306.47
Toebe Construction LLC $85,900,059.54 C. A. Hull Co., Inc. $75,168,084.97
Michigan Paving and Materials Company $60,396,152.56 Ajax Paving Industries, Inc. $58,852,714.43
C.A. Hull Co., Inc. $47,924,392.47 Michigan Paving and Materials Company $51,954,413.39
Kamminga & Roodvoets, Inc. $35,252,775.30 Toebe Construction LLC $51,230,441.01
Ajax Paving Industries, Inc. $33,864,363.03 Anlaan Corporation $49,976,605.08
Anlaan Corporation $30,078,414.86 Milbocker and Sons, Inc. $42,718,888.88
Florence Cement Company $26,482,000.24 Kamminga & Roodvoets, Inc. $42,294,672.37
Z Contractors, Inc. $25,213,801.01 Cadillac Asphalt, L.L.C. $31,670,388.70
TOTAL $687,127,309.96 TOTAL $724,833,776.60
TOTAL of AWARDED CONTRACTS $1,186,216,987.38 TOTAL of AWARDED CONTRACTS $1,202,259,878.36
Percent of Total Program 57.93% Percent of Total Program 60.29%
6
DISTRIBUTION OF PREQUALIFIED CONTRACTORSBy Financial Rating
PREQUALIFICATIONRANGE NUMBER PERCENTAGE NUMBER PERCENTAGE
of Contractors of total Number of Contractors of total Number$0 - $2,000,000 343 51.81% 347 51.03%
$2,000,001 - $10,000,000 33 4.98% 47 6.91%
$10,000,001 - $20,000,000 61 9.21% 60 8.82%
$20,000,001 - $100,000,000 142 21.45% 140 20.59%
$100,000,001 and Above 83 12.54% 86 12.65%
TOTALS 662 100.00% 680 100.00%
FY 2016 FY 2015
A total of 662 construction contractors were prequalified in FY 2016
144 contractors worked on projects as prime
7
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1,000
FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY16
RAILROAD 1 1 3 3 2
AERO 35 33 31 35 2
LOCAL 409 476 544 490 429
STATE 307 335 348 277 309
NU
MB
ER O
F P
RO
JEC
TSPROJECTS BY PROGRAM AREA
Number of Project LetFY 2012 - FY 2016
7.83% decrease
Totals 752 845 926 805 742 8
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY16RAILROAD $1.83 $0.36 $22.19 $4.82 $13.77AERO $14.61 $14.33 $20.10 $15.95 $0.15LOCAL $327.48 $372.10 $516.22 $424.55 $397.23STATE $643.79 $747.87 $795.17 $874.15 $879.09
DO
LLAR
S (In
Mill
ion)
PROJECTS BY PROGRAM AREAProject Dollars Let - 5 Year Comparison
$987.71 $1,134.66 $1,353.68Totals $1,319.47 $1,290.24
742805926
State trunkline projects represent $879.1 million, or 68.1% of the total project dollars
752
845
Total Number of Projects:
9
0.0%1.0%2.0%3.0%4.0%5.0%6.0%7.0%8.0%9.0%
10.0%11.0%12.0%13.0%14.0%15.0%16.0%17.0%
FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
STATE 9.18% 5.21% 10.37% 10.31% 6.33%
LOCAL 4.65% 6.39% 11.66% 16.65% 7.01%
AERO 0.27% 0.47% 0.32% 0.37% 0.13%
RAILROAD 0.00% 0.00% 0.11% 0.00% 0.00%
Perc
ent of Pro
ject
s
Total Projects 742752 845 926 805
6.33%, or 47 of the 742 project low bids received for the State trunkline projects were 10%
over the engineer’s estimate
ACCURACY OF ENGINEER’S ESTIMATES
Percent of Projects Let
10% Over the Engineer’s Estimate
By Program Area
Num
ber
of Pro
ject
s
3
10
$0.0
$100.0
$200.0
$300.0
$400.0
$500.0
$600.0
$700.0
$800.0
$900.0
FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16ENG EST CONTRACT $
-0.25%0.58%
-4.08%-8.54%
This chart represents the difference of total project dollars awarded above or below the engineer’s estimates total for each fiscal year
44.1% met the FHWA requirement to award 50% of the number of contracts +/- 10% of the engineer’s estimate
ACCURACY OF ENGINEER’S ESTIMATESProject Bids Awarded vs. Engineer’s Estimates
State Projects
Tota
l Pro
ject
Dolla
rs A
ward
ed
11
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 FY 15 FY 16
NU
MB
ER O
F C
ON
TRAC
TS
Accuracy of Engineer’s EstimatesSTATE PROJECTS vs. ALL BIDS REJECTED
STATE projects ABR Percent
2.28%
5.17%
6.50%
2.99%2.91%
For FY16, 2.91%, or 9 of the 309 State trunkline projects Let, resulted in
rejection of all bids12
MDOT designed 378 project jobs in FY16 of the 652 projects designed
During FY15, MDOT designed 244 project jobs of the 423 projects designed 13
48.1%
36.6%
48.9%
In FY16, MDOT designed 48.9%, or $377.56, from $690.3 in total contract dollars
In FY15, MDOT designed 36.6%, or $265.5, from $725.5 in total contract dollars 14
Unbalanced Bid ReviewWhat is an “unbalanced” bid?
A random list of State trunkline and Local Area program projects are selected for inclusion in an “unbalanced bid review.”
An “unbalanced” bid would be referred to as either materially or mathematically unbalanced in the pay items of the bid.
An example of a materially unbalanced bid would be, a pending correction of a plan quantity error, which would result in the low bidder no longer being the low bidder
An example of a mathematically unbalanced bid is much more common. A unit price of $0.01 on a pay item would typically result in a mathematically unbalanced bid.
In addition, projects ≥ $5 million as the engineer estimate not selected in the initial random selection process are required to be reviewed
Fiscal Year 2016
35.1% of 249 (State trunkline and Local area projects) let were selected and reviewed
$634.0 million, or 49.1% of project low bid dollars were reviewed
For FY 2016, there were no materially or mathematically unbalanced bids that justified bid rejection
15
SUPERIOR, 76 contracts (10.1%)$63.5, 5.35%
NORTH, 82 contracts (11.0%)$89.6, 7.55%
GRAND, 129 contracts (17.2%)$166.0,13.99%
BAY, 126 contracts, (16.8%)$186.6, 15.73%
SOUTHWEST, 100 contracts (13.4%)$153.8, 12.97%
UNIVERSITY, 107 contracts (14.3%)$123.0, 10.37%
METRO, 129 contracts (17.2%)$403.7, 34.03%
PROJECTS AWARDED by REGION – FY 2016Number of Projects Awarded, Dollars (In million) and Percent of Overall
For FY16, a total of 749 projects were awarded with $1.19 billion in total project dollars FY15 awarded a total of 756 contracts with $1.20 billion as the total project dollars
16
FY 2017 Project ProjectionsEffective: 10/6/2016
Let Month Number Estimated Dollars
OCT 26 $134.80
NOV 23 $217.80
DEC 51 $99.60
JAN 46 $89.90
FEB 53 $129.50
MAR 42 $81.10
APR 18 $80.20
MAY 6 $20.00
JUN 8 $50.70
JUL 4 $32.40
AUG 3 $2.60
SEP 6 $9.10
Totals 286 $947.70
Project projections encompass State trunkline program area only
286 projects with a total estimated dollar of $947.7 are scheduled to be advertised for FY17
Projected projects are classified under work groups of road, bridge, and traffic and safety17
FY 2016 Contract Service Division Accomplishments and Future Goals
Prequalification and Bid Letting GovDelivery is now available to contractors
A GovDelivery is a “ListServ” to which contractors can register for Prequalification and Bid Letting news and announcements
Transition from Expedite Bid to AASHTOWare Project Bids for contractor bid submission
Goals for FY 2017
Web-based submission of Prequalification application
Development of a condensed electronic prequalification renewal packet(a 1313 Form “EZ” renewal)
Electronic award processing of construction contracts
18
Recommended