View
39
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Forecasting tools and procedures at the Banque de France FORECASTING MODELS AND PROCEDURES OF EU CENTRAL BANKS April 23, 2008, Sofia Macro analysis and forecast division, Banque de France. Main points of the presentation. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Forecasting tools and procedures at the Banque de France
FORECASTING MODELS AND PROCEDURES OF EU CENTRAL BANKSApril 23, 2008, Sofia
Macro analysis and forecast division, Banque de France
Main points of the presentation
• General overview & a focus on the iteration of the macroeconomic and public finances division.
• Revised version of OPTIM• Forecasting inflation tools• French retail sector specificities• Dealing with minimum wage• Temptative labor share equation as a
guardrail to help the forecast
Forecasting procedures at the BdF:
General overview & a focus on the iteration of the macroeconomic and
public finances division.
Delphine Irac Banque de France
Public Finances
1. Spring Exercise: • End of March: annual public finances accounts delivery. Not
all components (for instance no investment for local administrations.
• Public finances division: almost one week to build a consistent historical database on the previous year.
• + make a forecast of the public fi variables• Delay the launching of the macroeconomic model based
forecast2. Winter Exercise: • From September to December: public finances law
project+amendments• Difficult to adjust the annual forecasts of the public finances
division with the quarterly public finances data (used in the model).
Monthly forecasting of French GDP:
a revised version of the OPTIM model
Banque de France Macro-analysis and forecasting division
Monthly forecasting of French GDP:a revised version of the OPTIM model
1. Description of OPTIM
2. Modelling strategy and data selection
3. Results
4. Conclusion
The spirit of OPTIM (1/2)
Brief overview of the difft methods used in short run assessment
Methods equation by equation:a. Factor modelsb. Bridge modelsc. Bayesian averagingd. Forecasts combination (Stock and Watson 2004)2. Model based methoda. VAR, Bayesian VARb. Neo keynesian modelc. Accounting relationships
The spirit of OPTIM (1/2)
• OPTIM = 1b + 1d
• + GETS procedure
1. Description of OPTIMThe main characteristics
• Bridge model created by Irac and Sédillot (2002)• New version by Barhoumi, Brunhes-Lesage, Darné,
Ferrara, Pluyaud and Rouvreau (2007)• Forecasts for French GDP and its components for the
current quarter (and for the next one, in a forthcoming version)
• Based on monthly indicators (survey data and hard data)
• Use: SRA BMPE (joint with the macro model Mascotte) + internal conjonctural assessments, monthly
1. Description of OPTIMA revised version of the model
• New equations
• Main contribution of the revised model: Monthly forecasts (previously quarterly forecasts)
• Systematic data selection using Gets
2. Modelling strategy and data selectionModelled components (1/3)
• French GDP quarterly growth rate+ GDP components quarterly growth rate
• Some components are not modelled(production of non market services, immaterial investment, changes in inventories)
• Aggregation with equations
2. Modelling strategy and data selectionModelled components (2/3)
A. On the demand side:
• Household consumption, computed by aggregation of the forecasts for:Household consumption in agri-food goodsHousehold consumption in energyHousehold consumption in manufactured goodsHousehold consumption in services
• Government consumption
• Investment, computed by aggregation of the forecasts for:Corporate investment in machinery and equipmentCorporate investment in buildingHousehold investmentGovernment investment
• Exports
• Imports
2. Modelling strategy and data selectionModelled components (3/3)
B. On the supply side:
• Total Production, computed by aggregation of the forecasts for:Production of agri-food goodsProduction of manufactured goodsProduction of energyProduction in constructionProduction of market services
C. Total GDP is forecast using a regression on total production.
2. Modelling strategy and data selectionMonthly exercises
• 3 forecasts for each quarter• After the publication of Insee and EC surveys
and before the ECB « monetary » Governing Council
• When data are missing for some months of the last quarter, the value for the quarter is computed as the 3-month moving average of the last available observations
2. Modelling strategy and data selectionThe data set (1/3)
• Monthly or higher frequency data
• Soft (survey) data and hard data
• Recent information (less than 2 months)
2. Modelling strategy and data selectionThe data set (2/3)
Name Source Data type Frequency Publication lag
Quarterly National Accounts Insee Hard Quarterly 45
Industrial Production Index Insee Hard Monthly 40
Consumption in manufactured goods Insee Hard Monthly 25
HICP in agri-food Eurostat Hard Monthly 20
New cars registrations CCFA Hard Monthly 2
Electricity consumption RTE Hard Daily 1
Declared housing starts Ministry of Equipment Hard Monthly 30
Business surveys in industry Banque de France Soft Monthly 15
Business surveys in retail trade Banque de France Soft Monthly 15
Business surveys in services Banque de France Soft Monthly 15
Business surveys in industry Insee Soft Monthly 0
Business surveys in retail trade Insee Soft Monthly 0
Business surveys in services Insee Soft Monthly 0
Business surveys in construction Insee Soft Monthly 0
Consumer surveys Insee Soft Monthly 0
Survey on public works FNTP Soft Monthly 35
Business and consumer surveys European Commission Soft Monthly 0
2. Modelling strategy and data selectionThe data set (3/3)
January February March April May
Q1 GDP release
Q4 GDP release
Jan. Inseeand EC surveys
Nov. IPI
Dec. BdF survey
Dec. cons. in manuf. goods
1st
forecast for Q1
2nd forecast for Q1
3rd forecast for Q1
Feb. Inseeand EC surveys
Dec. IPI
Jan. BdF survey
Jan. cons. in manuf. goods
Mar. Inseeand EC surveys
Jan. IPI
Feb. BdF survey
Feb. cons. in manuf. goods
Apr. Inseeand EC surveys
Feb. IPI
Mar. BdF survey
Mar. cons. in manuf. goods
May Inseeand EC surveys
Mar. IPI
Apr. BdF survey
Apr. cons. in manuf. goods
2. Modelling strategy and data selectionGeneral specification of the equations
• Autoregressive-distributed-lag (ADL) bridge equations
2. Modelling strategy and data selectionData selection procedure (1/2)
• Systematic data selection using Gets• Preselection of explanative variables strongly
correlated with the modelled variable but not with each other
• No mix between similar data sources• No use of synthetic survey indicators• Selection of a first set of equations with an
emphasis on economic content• Final selection with rolling forecasts, taking into
account the data availabilty
Monthly forecasts
• Optim: Same equation for a given quarter RHS missing explanatory variables are estimated using ad hoc
methods (average of the observed months etc.) Main drawback: very likely to miss turning points
• Alternative methods (e.g. INSEE) Different equations for different months The equation specification is optimized w.r.t the set of data that
are available when the fcsts is implemented Drawback: more difficult to analyse/justify fcsts revision since
change in the equation and change in the model
3. ResultsRoot Mean Squared Errors
Component First Second Third AR Naive
GDP with IPI 0.32 0.31 0.23 0.38 0.51 without IPI 0.27 0.25 0.25
Production Agri-food with IPI 0.49 0.47 0.45 0.57 0.68 without IPI 0.54 0.54 0.54Production Manufactured with IPI 1.14 1.07 0.71 1.28 1.73 without IPI 0.82 0.79 0.79Production Energy with IPI 1.56 1.48 1.21 1.44 2.52 without IPI 1.44 1.34 1.34Production Construction with IPI 0.63 0.57 0.55 0.67 0.76 without IPI 0.62 0.60 0.60Production Services with IPI 0.41 0.41 0.34 0.45 0.59 without IPI 0.44 0.39 0.37
Household Consumption 0.26 0.19 0.19 0.33 0.45Government Consumption 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.28Investment 0.80 0.77 0.71 0.87 1.24Imports 1.23 1.13 1.13 1.31 1.54Exports 1.46 1.32 1.27 1.62 2.07
4. Conclusion
• Satisfying results given the comparisons with benchmarks
• Next step: future quarter forecasts
• Problems concerning the aggregation of forecasts for GDP components
Forecasting inflation : 3 tools according to the horizon
Banque de France
Macro-analysis and forecasting division
3 tools according to the horizon of analysis
• Very short term (3 months ahead) - NIPE– Very detailed analysis (≈ 50 components)– Unconditional projections (persistence of inflation)
• Short term (1 year ahead) - NIPE– Detailed sectored analysis (≈15 components)– Conditional to import prices, wages…
• Medium term (2 years ahead) - BMPE– HICP and HICP excluding energy– Value added Prices and Import deflator
Very short term (3 months ahead)
• Available information
• Non conditional forecast:Stochastic process Zt, observable from t = 1 until t = T
Forecast :
• SARMA processes (Use of tramoseats)
111 ,... , , ˆˆ ZZZZZ TThT
H
hhT
Very short term (3 months ahead)
Food
• Each main component is modelled with an equation:
Meat product HICPWheat product HICPMilk product HICPOil product HICPNon-alcoholic HICP
Very short term (3 months ahead)
Food
• Explanatory variables:
Wholesale pricesProducer prices Lagged variable
Short term (1 year ahead) - NIPE
List of components (components asked for the NIPE in blue)
0.207 FOOD Econometric model
0.085 Unprocessed food (meat, fish, vegetables, fruit) ARMA with fixed seasonal effects
0.122 Processed food
0.099 - Processed food excluding tobacco ECM
0.023 - Tobacco Hikes according to announcement
0.298 MANUFACTURED GOODS ECM
0.079 ENERGY
0.044 Oil products ECM
0.035 Other energies (gas, electricity) ARMA
0.416 SERVICES
0.027 CommunicationsLeast square on seasonal dummies
0.362 Private services ECM
0.014 Rail and road transportsLeast square on seasonal dummies
0.008 Air transports Regression on brent prices
0.004 Combined transportsLeast square on seasonal dummies
0.001 Sea transports and others Least square on seasonal dummies
0.999 ENSEMBLE
Short term (1 year ahead)- NIPEThe underlying HICP
• The underlying HICP is composed by three main sectors=>Private services HICP (Housing services, Healthcare, Restaurants)=>Processed food HICP=>Industrial goods HICP
• For each sectors, an Error Correction Model where year-on-year inflation is supposed to be consistent with an I(1) process.
• Exogenous variables come from Mascotte and ECB assumptions
• Sectors depend on different factors
• Manufactured goods:• Wages• Prices of raw material• Import prices• Capacity utilization rate
Short term (1 year ahead) – NIPESectors dependent on different factors
• Private services:• Wages• Unemployment rate
Short term (1 year ahead) – NIPESectors dependent on different factors
•Processed food prices
A model with two equations:
- Domestic Agricultural prices depend on international food prices
- Processed food prices depend on domestic agricultural prices, unit labor cost and the capacity utilization rate.
Short term (1 year ahead) – NIPESectors dependent on different factors
Short term (1 year ahead)- NIPEThe energy HICP
• The energy HICP is disaggregated into two components
=>oil products=>gas and electricity
• Oil products are modelled in two steps=>Oil products HICP without taxes is modelled with an ECM with
the price of the brent as exogenous variable=>Taxes are included to take into account their nonlinearity
• Gas and electricity prices are modelled via seasonal and non seasonal dummies
Short term (1 year ahead)- NIPEThe unprocessed food HICP
• Four sub-indexes=>meat products HICP
=>fish products HICP
=>fruit HICP
=>vegetable HICP
• ARMA with fixed seasonal effects
Short term (1 year ahead)- NIPEResearch on a new inflation forecasting model
• A need to reassess the equations:• A longer period• Changes in quarterly national accounts
• Investigation on the best level of aggregation
• New exogenous variables such as producer prices
Short term (1 year ahead) – NIPEResiduals – Industrial goods
-.3
-.2
-.1
.0
.1
.2
.3
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
RESCM
Short term (1 year ahead) – NIPEResiduals – Private services
-.4
-.3
-.2
-.1
.0
.1
.2
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09
RESSER
Short term (1 year ahead) – NIPEIndustrial goods
Dependent Variable: GA_I_CM Method: Least Squares Date: 11/23/07 Time: 09:59 Sample (adjusted): 1986Q3 2007Q3 Included observations: 85 after adjustments Convergence achieved after 5 iterations GA_I_CM = C(1)+GA_I_CM(-1)+C(2)*(GA_I_CM(-1)- C(3) *GA_REMPT(-4)-C(4)*GA_MP_HARD(-2)-C(5)*GA_UMTO1P(-5)) +C(6)*D(GA_I_CM(-4))+C(7)*TUCBDF(-5)+RESCM
Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C(1) -3.552053 1.085872 -3.271154 0.0016
C(2) -0.122235 0.031360 -3.897829 0.0002 C(3) 0.244945 0.201851 1.213495 0.2286 C(4) 0.018917 0.020055 0.943274 0.3485 C(5) 0.114072 0.062951 1.812082 0.0738 C(6) -0.321027 0.095106 -3.375460 0.0012 C(7) 4.161255 1.310199 3.176048 0.0021
R-squared 0.974054 Mean dependent var 1.152626
Adjusted R-squared 0.972059 S.D. dependent var 1.211334 S.E. of regression 0.202483 Akaike info criterion -0.277558 Sum squared resid 3.197952 Schwarz criterion -0.076398 Log likelihood 18.79620 F-statistic 488.0473 Durbin-Watson stat 2.055118 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
Short term (1 year ahead) – NIPEPrivate services
Dependent Variable: GA_I_SER Method: Least Squares Date: 11/23/07 Time: 09:59 Sample: 1988Q2 2007Q3 Included observations: 78 Convergence achieved after 4 iterations GA_I_SER= C(1)+GA_I_SER(-1)+C(2)*(GA_I_SER(-1)-C(3) *GA_REMPT(-2)-C(31)*TXCHO_BIT(-4))+C(5)*DUM021_031+C(6) *D(GA_I_SER(-1))+RESSER
Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C(1) 0.524981 0.275875 1.902970 0.0610
C(2) -0.086988 0.023660 -3.676632 0.0005 C(3) 0.730296 0.237398 3.076251 0.0030
C(31) -0.518618 0.287777 -1.802153 0.0757 C(5) 0.505700 0.113300 4.463392 0.0000 C(6) 0.150281 0.077989 1.926964 0.0579
R-squared 0.988035 Mean dependent var 3.123346
Adjusted R-squared 0.987204 S.D. dependent var 1.406408 S.E. of regression 0.159092 Akaike info criterion -0.764868 Sum squared resid 1.822334 Schwarz criterion -0.583582 Log likelihood 35.82984 F-statistic 1189.106 Durbin-Watson stat 1.727423 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
The French retail sector specificities:
Banque de France
Macro-analysis and forecasting division
18 March 2008
Introduction
• The reform of the retail sector:
=> From 1996, a sector with low competition
=> From January 2006 to January 2008, three reforms have changed the competition environment
• French sellers/retailers negociation context
The reform of the retail sector1. A sector with low competition
• The legislation
=>The “Raffarin law” (1996) : An authorization is needed to open a retail shop
=>The “Galland law” (1996) : It is forbidden to sell beneath the unit cost
• As a result, from 1996 to 2004, the inflation in processed food prices is higher in France than in the euro area
The reform of the retail sector1. A sector with low competition
Processed food year on year inflation rate 1996 - 2004
-2
0
2
4
6
8
96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04
euro area France Germany
The inflation in processed food prices is higher in France than in the euro area
from 1996 to 2004
The reform of the retail sector 1. A sector with low competition
Even if the sector was competitive, retailers would have positive margins thanks to commercial services
Producer Retailer Final consumer
Receives sell price
Receives
unit cost
Pays
unit cost
Margin 1
Pays
sell price
Pays commercial
services
Receives commercial
servicesMargin 2
The reform of the retail sector2. From 2004: a new competition environment
• In January 2004, sellers and retailers are urged by the French government to negociate their prices down
• From January 2006, a new breakeven point is defined: commercial margins are partly deductible from the unit cost.
• From January 2006 to January 2008, the amount of commercial margins that is deductible increases up to be totally deductible (“Chatel law”)
The reform of the retail sector2. A new competition environment
• Consequently: the inflation in processed food was below 1% from 2005 to July 2007
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
05M01 05M07 06M01 06M07 07M01 07M07
euro area France Germany
The negociation contextPrices are negociated at fixed dates
• Negociation rounds occur at fixed dates.
• Negociations from producers to retailers mostly occurs in January and February.
• In the milk market, prices are fixed four times a year by a national syndicate of milk producers. As a result, producer prices are less volatile.
• Menu-costs: The impact of the increase in international food prices may be delayed.
Dealing with minimum wage indexation in the forecast
Date SMIC = Worker type 1 (w1)
is paid:
Worker type 2 (w2)
is paid:
Worker type 3 (w3)
is paid:
Latest wage agreement
issued:
Year NMARCHWage agreement
1000 € 1000 € 1009 € 1020 € W1 =1000€W2 = 1009€W3 = 1020€
Year N JULYSMIC raise
1010 € 1010 € 1010€(SMIC effect indexation)
1020 €(no indexation)
W1 =1000€W2 = 1010€W3 = 1020€
Year N+1MARCHWage agreement
1010 € 1010€ ?See below
?See below
?See below
Wage indexation in France
• In March N+1, workers of types 2 and 3 will try to catch up with the increase in the wages of workers of type 1 (+1% compared to the previous agreement).
• However, there is no reason why there will be full indexation of the other wages on the raise of the SMIC. Therefore, the bargaining process could typically end up in a statu quo agreement such as:
• w1 : the SMIC (1010 €)• w2 : 1010 or 1015€• w3: 1020 or 1025 €
Estimation of a labor share equation as a guard
Labor share equation
• Benchmark equation:• Y=F(K,BL)=Kf(l)• With l=BL/K• w/p=Bf’(l)• Labor share=s=lf’(l)/f(l)
• Bentolila & SaintPaul:
• s=g(k) with k=capital output ratio (SK) schedule
Shifts in the SK schedule
• Changes in oil prices: shifts in the SK schedule
• Effect of mark-up:
S=µ-1g(k)
• Increase in workers bargaining power shift the SK schedule upwards
Coeff Student
DLOG(TM1(-2)) 0.152061 2.487627
D(social wedge) -1.409215 -6.079143
DLOG(PRODT) 3.349982 9.439873
D(CURBDF(-1)) 0.464890 1.690725
D(D(UrateO_BIT)) 0.031071 2.136494
LOG(TM1(-1)) -0.090613 -3.838195
LOG(Globalization(-1)) 0.125471 4.370235
LOG(Minimum wage(-1)) -0.040488 -4.015430
Interest rate(-1) 1.029257 5.166875
Estimations
• Dependent variable: 1-labor share (TM)
Contributions
Variation du taux de marge et contributions entre 1995 et 2007
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
poin
ts
coin social productivité smic réeltaux d'intérêt réel lissé TUC tx chômagetx d'ouverture cale variation du taux de marge
Recommended