Magnetars and Domain walls - 名古屋大学hamanaka/Hashimoto.pdf · 2014. 1. 6. · Magnetars and...

Magnetars and Domain walls

Koji Hashimoto (Osaka / RIKEN)

Jan 05 2014 @Nagoya univ. workshop “Mathematics and physics on topological solitons”

Phys.Rev. D88 (2013) 081701 arXiv/1209.4814[hep-ph] + work in progress w/ M. Eto (Yamagata), T. Hatsuda (RIKEN)

Discovery of astro-solitons?

Problem Origin of magnetars?

Cause

No magnetization at high density hadron phase?

Our solution High density neutron matter

Axial anomaly + π0 domain wall

New phase : QCD Ferromagnetism

~B

Parallel layers of domain walls

of neutral pion

1. Magnetars. 2. Pion domain wall. 3.  QCD Ferromagnetism.

4.  Holographization.

Plan

3 pages

3 pages

5 pages

2 pages

Observation of Magnetars

B = 3.2⇥ 1019pPP [G]

L = @t(I⌦2) / P /P 3

L = (2/3)m2 / B2/P 4

Spindown luminocity

Magnetic dipole assumption

[T.Enoto, 天文月報 2012.7] Magnetar hypothesis

Surface magnetic field

＋

||

Origin of the strong magnetic field?

[D.Page]

[Fukushima, Hatsuda 1005.4814]

1. Magnetars. 2. Pion domain wall. 3.  QCD Ferromagnetism.

4.  Holographization.

Plan

3 pages

3 pages

5 pages

2 pages

--- What happens at the core?

Weinberg’s action : nucleons and all pions

Chemical potential giving high density neutron matter

+

1

2

(@µ✓)2+ f2

⇡m2⇡(cos ✓ � 1)

L = n(i�µ@µ + µ�0 �Mn)n� 1

2f⇡(n�µ�5n)@

µ✓

Dµ ⌘@µ +

i

4f2⇡

(1 + �2/4f2⇡)

�1⌧ · (�⇥ @µ�)

�

Describing high density Chiral lagrangian for neutron and neutral pion

Domain wall of neutral pion

Chiral lagrangian = Sine-Gordon model

L =

1

2

f2⇡(@µ✓)

2 �m2⇡f

2⇡ cos ✓

Domain wall solution

x

3✓(x)

�3 =2f⇡

sinh[m⇡x3]

�1 = �2 = 0

No topological obstruction against creation

✓(x)

�1,�2�3

S3

[Hatsuda 1986]

Classical solution connecting and ✓ = 2⇡✓ = 0

Light domain wall in neutron matter

Integration of neutron at 1-loop à pion effective action modified

- Light domain wall

Neutron matter effect

L =

↵

2

(@0✓)2 � �

2

(@i✓)2+ f2

⇡m2⇡(cos ✓ � 1)

n

n

θ θ

[Hatsuda 1986]

1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08 1.10

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0 �

µ/Mn

- β decreases at high density

1. Magnetars. 2. Pion domain wall. 3.  QCD Ferromagnetism.

4.  Holographization.

Plan

3 pages

3 pages

5 pages

2 pages

--- What happens at the core?

--- Wall are light at high density

Baryonically charged domain wall

QCD axial anomaly induces “ ” term, ⇡0 ! 2�

Domain wall inducing a baryon charge, under a magnetic field

Energy per baryon charge: If smaller than neutron mass, domain wall dominates!

[Son, Stephanov, 0710.1084]

Lanom

=e

4⇡2

µBB3

@3

✓~~~

~~~

θ q

q q

Ferromagnetic QCD

Magnetization via wall

Induced baryon density :

Spontaneous magnetization. Very strong magnetic field,

QCD ferromagnetism

~B

Domain wall

layers B3 ⇠ 1019[G]

M =eµB

2⇡d

M =eµB

4⇡2@3✓

M =µB⇢

B3

[Son, Zhitnitsky, hep-ph/0405216]

Wall layer with interval : d

Equilibrium

Issue 1) Spins align on the wall

n

n

pion �i�5@3✓

Si(x) = hn�i�5ni = (� � 1)f2⇡@i✓(x)

Neutron spins accumulate on the wall:

à Domain wall carries neutron spins:

Neutrons have magnetic moment :

Domain walls are magnetized:

[Hatsuda 1986]

µ =ges32Mn

with g ⇠ �3.8

Issue 2) Eternal current at wall boundary Elemag + anomaly

EOM for A2

x1

x2x3

wall On the wall,

is nonzero, then wall boundary has effective eternal current

Issue 3) Stability of the wall

The baryon charge induced is proportional to the area surrounded by the projected curve onto �1 = �2 = 0

The original domain wall is most effective, thus stable

�3 kinetic term does not cost energy +

The original wall has the largest charge

1. Magnetars. 2. Pion domain wall. 3.  QCD Ferromagnetism.

4.  Holographization.

Plan

3 pages

3 pages

5 pages

2 pages

--- What happens at the core?

--- Wall are light at high density

--- Anomaly magnetizes the core

Full meson theory (酒井杉本) giving the same

SD8 = � �Nc

216⇡3

Zd

4xdz (1 + z

2)F 2µz

AzPions are gauge field

Smass = c

Zd

4x Ptr exp

�i

Z 1

�1Azdz

�+ c.c.

Quark mass effect : worldsheet instanton

[Hirayama, Lin, Yee, KH 0803.4192] [Aharony, Kutasov, 0803.3547]

EOM for is solved as Aµ(x)

Then the EOM for reduces to sine-Gordon eq. of ✓(x)

Aµ = 0, Az =1

1 + z

2⌧3 ✓(x

µ)

Az(x)

Anomaly analysis and Magnetization

Anomaly = CS term of the D8-brane action

SCS =Nc

24⇡2

Zd

4xdz A

(B)0 B

(em)3 @3Az.

Consider a chiral limit for light domain walls,

Az =1

1 + z

2ax

3

Total energy with all D8 action + EM :

= �Nc

✓a+

µqB

�

◆2

�Ncµ2

q

�B2 +B2

E ⇠ �Nca2 +NcµqBa+B2

µq >p

�/Nc à Spontaneous magnetization

Problem Origin of magnetars?

Cause

No magnetization at high density hadron phase?

Our solution High density neutron matter

Axial anomaly + π0 domain wall

New phase : QCD Ferromagnetism

Neutral pion domain walls

More to come…

・Stability of the walls? Charged pion condensates

・Gravitational waves from isolated neutron stars?

・Neutron superfluidity? p-wave at high density, pairing on the walls

・Classification of neutron stars?

・EOS via walls?

[T.Enoto, 天文月報 (2012)]

・More realistic? Nuclear forces, hyperons