M INING H IGH -S PEED D ATA S TREAMS Presented by: Yumou Wang Dongyun Zhang Hao Zhou

MINING HIGH-SPEED DATA STREAMS

Presented by:

Yumou Wang

Dongyun Zhang

Hao Zhou

INTRODUCTION The world’s information is doubling

every two years. From 2006 to 2011, the amount of

information grew by a factor of 9 in just five years.

INTRODUCTION By 2020 the world will generate 50

times the amount of information and 75 times the number of "information containers"

However, IT staff to manage it will grow less than 1.5 times.

Current algorithms can only deal with small amount of data less than a day’s data of many applications.

For example, banks, telecommunication companies.

INTRODUCTION Problems : When new examples arrive at a

higher rate than they can be mined, the amount of unused data grows without bounds as time progresses.

Today, to deal with these huge amount of data in a responsible way is very important.

Mining these continuous data streams brings unique opportunities, but also new challenges.

BACKGROUNDDesign Criteria for mining High

Speed Data Streams It must be able to build a model using at

most one scan of the data. It must use only a fixed amount of main

memory. It must require small constant time per

record.

BACKGROUND Usually, use KDD system to operate

this examples when they arrive.Shortcomings: learning model

learned are highly sensitive to example ordering compare to the batch model.

Others can produce the same model as batch version but very slower.

CLASSIFICATION METHOD Input: Examples of the form (x,y), y is the class

label, x is the vector of attributes. Output: A model y=f(x), predict the classes y of

future examples x with high accuracy.

DECISION TREE One of the most effective

and widely-used classification methods.

A decision tree is a decision support tool that uses a tree-like graph or model. 

Decision trees are commonly used in machine learning.

BUILDING A DECISION TREE 1. Starting at the root. 2. Testing all the attributes and choose

the best one according to some heuristic measure.

3. Split one node into branches and leaves.

4. Recursively replacing leaves by test nodes.

EXAMPLE OF DECISION TREE

EXAMPLE OF DECISION TREE

PROBLEMS There are some problems existed in

traditional decision tree. Some of them assume that all training data

examples can be stored simultaneously in main memory.

Disadvantages: Limited the number of examples can be learned from.

Disk-based decision tree learners: examples in disk, repeatedly reading them.

Disadvantages: expensive when learning complex trees.

HOEFFDING TREES Designed for extremely large datasets Main idea: To find the best attribute at

a given node by considering only a small subset of the training examples that pass through the node.

Using how many examples is sufficient

HOEFFDING BOUND

n

In

2

)1(R 2

Definition: The statistical result that can decide how many examples “n” using by each node is called Hoeffding bound.

Assume: R—the range of variable r n independent observations mean: r’

With probability 1-δ, the true mean of r is at least r’-є

HOEFFDING BOUND

n

In

2

)1(R 2

This function is a decreasing function n is bigger, the є is smaller It is the difference between true value and

mean value of r.

HOEFFDING TREE ALGORITHM

HOEFFDING TREE ALGORITHM Inputs:

S -> is a sequence of examples,X -> is a set of discrete attributes,G(.) -> is a split evaluation

function, δ -> is one minus the desired

probability of choosing the correct attribute at any given node.

Outputs: HT -> is a decision tree.

HOEFFDING TREE ALGORITHMGoal: Ensure that, with a high probability, the attribute chosen using n examples, is the same as that would be chosen using infinite examples.

Let Xa be the attribute with the highest observed G’ and Xb be with second highest attribute.After seeing n examples.

Let ΔG’ = G’(Xa) – G’(Xb)ΔG’ > ϵ

Thus a node needs to accumulate examples from the stream until ϵ becomes smaller than ΔG.

HOEFFDING TREE ALGORITHM The algorithm constructs the tree using

the same procedure as ID3. It calculates the information gain for the attributes and determines the best attributes.

At each node it checks for condition ΔG > ϵ. If the condition is satisfied, then it creates child nodes based on the test at the node.

If not it streams in more training examples and carries out the calculations till it satisfies the condition.

HOEFFDING TREE ALGORITHMMemory cost d—number of attributes c—number of classes v—number of values per attribute l—number of leaves in the tree The memory cost for each leaf is

O(dvc) The memory cost for whole tree is

O(ldvc)

ADVANTAGES OF HOEFFDING TREE

1. Can deal with extremely large datasets.

2. Each example to be read at most once in a small constant time. Makes it possible to mine online data sources.

3. Build very complex trees with acceptable computational cost.

VFDT—VERY FAST DECISION TREE

Breaking ties Reduce waste Useful under condition where

Use of Split may not change with a single example Significantly reduce the time of re-computation

Memory cleanup Measurement of Clearance of least promising leaves Option of enabling reactivation

VFDT—VERY FAST DECISION TREE

Filtering out poor attributes Dropping early Reduces memory consumption

Initialization Can be initialized with other existing tree Set a head start

Rescans

TESTS—CONFIGURATION

14 Concepts Generated by random decision trees using Number of leaves: 2.2k to 61k Noise level: 0 to 30%

50k examples for testing Available memory: 40MB Legacy processors

TESTS—SYNTHETIC DATA

, ,

TESTS—SYNTHETIC DATA

TESTS—SYNTHETIC DATA

TESTS—SYNTHETIC DATA

TESTS—SYNTHETIC DATA

TESTS—SYNTHETIC DATA

Time consumption20m examples

VFDT takes 5752s to read, 625s to process

100k examplesC4.5 takes 36sVFDT takes 47s

TESTS—PARAMETERS

W/ & w/o over-pruning

TESTS—PARAMETERS

W/ ties vs. w/o ties65 nodes vs. 8k nodes for VFDT805 nodes vs. 8k nodes for VFDT-boot72.9% vs. 86.9% for VFDT83.3% vs. 88.5% for VFDT-boot

vs. VFDT: +1.1% accuracy, +3.8x timeVFDT-boot: -0.9% accuracy, +3.7x time5% more nodes

TESTS—PARAMETERS

40MB vs. 80MB memory7.8k more nodesVFDT: +3.0% accuracyVFDT-boot: +3.2% accuracy

vs. 30% less nodesVFDT: +2.3% accuracyVFDT-boot: +1.0% accuracy

TESTS—WEB DATA

For predicting accesses

1.89m examples

61.1% with most common class

276230 examples for testing

TESTS—WEB DATA

Decision dump 64.2% accuracy 1277s to learn

C4.5 with 40MB memory 74.5k examples 2975s to learn 73.3% accuracy

VFDT-bootstrapped with C4.5 1.61m examples 1450s to learn after initialization(983s to read)

TESTS—WEB DATA

MINING TIME-CHANGING DATA STREAMS

WHY IS VFDT NOT ENOUGH?

VFDT, assume training data is a sample drawn from stationary distribution.

•Most large databases or data streams violate this assumption –Concept Drift: data is generated by a time-

changing concept function, e.g. •Seasonal effects •Economic cycles

•Goal: –Mining continuously changing data streams –Scale well

WHY IS VFDT NOT ENOUGH?

Common Approach: when a new example arrives, reapply a traditional learner to a sliding window of w most recent examples

–Sensitive to window size •If w is small relative to the concept shift rate,

assure the availability of a model reflecting the current concept

•Too small w may lead to insufficient examples to learn the concept

–If examples arrive at a rapid rate or the concept changes quickly, the computational cost of reapplying a learner may be prohibitively high.

CVFDT

CVFDT (Concept-adapting Very Fast Decision Tree learner) –Extend VFDT –Maintain VFDT’s speed and accuracy –Detect and respond to changes in the example-

generating process

CVFDT (CONTD.) With a time-changing concept, the current

splitting attribute of some nodes may not be the best anymore.

An out dated subtree may still be better than the best single leaf, particularly if it is near the root. – Grow an alternative subtree with the new best

attribute at its root, when the old attribute seems out-of-date.

Periodically use a bunch of samples to evaluate qualities of trees. – Replace the old subtree when the alternate one

becomes more accurate.

HOW CVFDT WORKS

EXAMPLE

SAMPLE EXPERIMENT RESULT

CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK

CVFDT is able to maintain a decision-tree up-to—date with a window of examples by using a small constant amount of time for each new examples that arrives.

Empirical studies show that CVFDT is effectively able to keep its model up-to-date with a massive data stream even in the face of large and frequent concept shifts.

Future Work: Currently CVFDT discards subtrees that are out-of-date, but some concepts change periodically and these subtrees may become useful again – identifying these situations and taking advantage of them is another area for further study.

THANK YOU