View
232
Download
2
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
30/09/58
1
2 October 2015Dr. Pramin NorachanManager, Structural Engineering Unit, AIT Consulting
Presentation Outline
1. Introduction
2. Global Retrofitting
3. Local Retrofitting
4. Example 1: 5-Story RC School Building
5. Example 2: 4-Story RC Hotel Building
6. Example 3: 55-Story High-Rise Building
30/09/58
2
Dr. Pramin Norachan 4
30/09/58
3
Dr. Pramin Norachan 5JSCE, Concrete Engineering Series No.28, 1998. (In Japanese)
Dr. Pramin Norachan 6
Global
Local
30/09/58
4
Dr. Pramin Norachan 7
The design philosophy for strengthening can be divided into two approaches.
The first approach is the system strengthening (global strengthening) which new elements are added to a building to enhance its global stiffness.
With an increase in the stiffness, the natural period of vibration of the building is to decrease. This will result in a decrease in the amount of horizontal displacement that must be achieved by the building to resist earthquakes.
Moreover, addition of new members to the building shall mostly increase the horizontal load capacity of the building as well. Therefore, the increased capacity will require greater ground motions to allow the building to develop a yielding behavior.
Thus, it can be said that the system strengthening does not only prevent collapsing but also delays structural damages.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 8
The second approach is element strengthening (local strengthening) which is a method based on the insufficient capacities of members due to the sustained damages without undertaking major changes in the load-deformation relationship of the building.
It should also be noted that there will be no significant changes in the displacement demand after the member strengthening.
30/09/58
5
Dr. Pramin Norachan 10
Among the global strengthening methods, addition of RC shear walls is the most popular one.
The installation of RC shear walls greatly improves lateral load capacityand stiffness of the structure.
In the strengthening method with shear walls, the existing partition walls in the building are removed and high strength reinforced concrete shear walls are built instead.
30/09/58
6
Dr. Pramin Norachan 11
Shear walls have to be constructed from the foundation level and there may not need to strengthen other components.
The shear walls can resist majority of the earthquake loads and limits the displacement behavior of the building.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 12
Under enormous cyclic forces during a seismic effect, Buckling Restrained Brace (BRB) which is system based strengthening techniques (global strengthening) devices can be used to increase the resistance of frame structures by providing energy dissipation and introducing nonlinear behavior.
30/09/58
7
Dr. Pramin Norachan 13
Testing and evaluating are required for designing and ensuring quality control.
The structures are susceptible to collapse or large lateral displacements due to earthquake ground motions and require special attention to limit the displacement.
This displacement can be brought into limit by providing BRB in the structure.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 14
30/09/58
8
Dr. Pramin Norachan 15
Dr. Pramin Norachan 16
Passive control systems reduce structural vibration and associatedforces through energy dissipation devices that do not require external power. These devices utilize the motion of the structure to develop counteracting control forces and absorb a portion of the input seismic energy.
Active control systems, however, enhance structural response through control forces developed by force delivery devices that rely on external power to operate. The actuator forces are controlled by real time controllers that process the information obtained from sensors within the structure.
Semi-active control systems combine passive and active control devices and are sometimes used to optimize the structural performance with minimal external power requirements.
30/09/58
9
Dr. Pramin Norachan 17
The seismic base isolation technology involves placing flexible isolation systems.between the foundation and the superstructure.
By means of their flexibility and energy absorption capability, the isolation systems reflect and absorb part of the earthquake input energy before this energy is fully transmitted to the superstructure, reducing the energy dissipation demand on the superstructure.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 18
Base isolation causes the natural period of the structure to increase and results in increased displacements across the isolation level and reduced accelerations and displacements in the superstructure during an earthquake.
Base isolation is fundamentally concerned to reduce the horizontal seismic forces.
30/09/58
10
Dr. Pramin Norachan 19
A typical base isolation system is evolved by the use of rubber bearing located at the base of the building.
Rubber bearing consist of laminated layers of rubber and steel plates.
The main advantage are good protection against earthquake due to decrease shear.Superstructure will need no reinforcement.
30/09/58
11
Dr. Pramin Norachan 21
There are several options for the jacketing of concrete members which are element based strengthening techniques (local strengthening).
Usually, the exiting member is wrapped with a jacket of concrete reinforced with longitudinal steel bars and ties, or with weld wire fabric.
Based on this method, axial strength, bending strength, and stiffness of the original column are increased.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 22
Reinforcement concrete jacketing can be used as a repair of strengthening scheme.
If there is damage in some of the existing members, they should be repaired before jacketing.
30/09/58
12
Dr. Pramin Norachan 23
Jacketing of beams is recommended for several purposes as it gives continuity to the columnsand increases the strength and stiffness of the structure.
While jacketing a beam, its flexural resistance must be carefully computed to avoid the creation of a strong beam‐weak column system.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 24
Jacketing of beam may be carried out under different ways, the most common are one-sided jackets or 3- and 4-sided jackets.
The beam should be jacketed through its whole length.
The reinforcement has also been added to increase beam flexural capacity moderately and to produce high joint shear stresses.
30/09/58
13
Dr. Pramin Norachan 25
Dr. Pramin Norachan 26
The steel jacket retrofit has been used as a method to enhance the shear strength and ductility of square reinforced concrete (RC) columns in existing buildings
Local strengthening of columns has been frequently accomplished by jacketing with steel plates.
30/09/58
14
Dr. Pramin Norachan 27
FRP composite materials have experienced a continuous increase of use in structural strengthening and repair applications around the world in the last fifteen years. In general, applications that allow complete wrapping of the member with FRP have proven to be effective.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 28
Wrapping of columns to increase their load and deformation capacity is the most effective and most commonly used method of retrofitting with composites.
However, certain performance and failure mode issues regarding different wrapping configuration and fiber orientations.
30/09/58
15
Dr. Pramin Norachan 29
Influence of shear strengthening and anchorage on FRP strengthened beam behavior under cyclic loading by using FRP plates in various configurations.
It can be seen from this figure that flexural strengthening of beams without proper attention to brittle shear and debonding failure modes not only renders the strengthening application ineffective, but also harms the member by decreasing its ductility.
30/09/58
16
Dr. Pramin Norachan 31
Seismic performance review of an existing 5-story RC frame-Infill wall school building and comparison of various retrofit options is presented here.
Rastriya Higher Secondary School Building, Nepal
Dr. Pramin Norachan 32
30/09/58
17
Dr. Pramin Norachan 33
Dr. Pramin Norachan 34
Stage I: Collecting As-built Building InformationThe architectural and structural drawings of the building are provided by the client. However, it is understood that the drawings for the extension part of the building are not available. On-site measurements and investigation are carried out to collect the as-built information of extension part.
Stage II: Performance Based Evaluation for the Existing BuildingPerformance based evaluation is carried out to check the seismic performance of the existing building using the as-built information from the previous stage.
Stage III: Performance Based Evaluation for the Strengthened BuildingsPerformance based evaluation is carried out to check the seismic performance of the strengthened buildings based on common strengthening techniques used by practical engineers.
30/09/58
18
Dr. Pramin Norachan 35
IS 1893:2002
NBC 105:1994
Nepal
Dr. Pramin Norachan 36
Response spectrum for seismic zone V (Z = 0.36) based on type III of subsoil (soft soil), specified in IS 1893:2002, approximately equivalent to the response spectrum with 1.1 of seismic zone factor, mentioned in NBC 105:1994.
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Spectral A
cceleration, Sa (g)
Natural Period (s)
Response Spectra
DBE
MCE
T1T2T3T4T5T6
MCE level response spectrum is estimated by increasing the spectra values of DBE level response spectrum by 2.0 times.
Modal pushover analysis (MPA) is conducted to determine the inelastic response of the building.
30/09/58
19
Dr. Pramin Norachan 37
Dr. Pramin Norachan 38
Nonlinear Components- Columns (Fiber hinges)- Girders (Moment hinges)- Infill walls
(Tension/Compression limits)
Linear Component- Slab
30/09/58
20
Dr. Pramin Norachan 39
Modeling Parameters and Numerical Acceptance Criteria for Nonlinear Procedures-Reinforced Concrete Beams
(Table 6-7, ASCE 41-06, Supplement No. 1)
Dr. Pramin Norachan 40
Moment hinge
30/09/58
21
Dr. Pramin Norachan 41
Column fiber sections
Dr. Pramin Norachan 42
1. Perform modal analysis to get periods (T1, T2,…,Tn). The combination of participating mass based on selected modes must greater than 90%.
2. Read the spectral curve according to the periods
3. Find the modal participation factor for each mode,
4. Find the amplitude of each mode at the roof,
5. Find the spectral displacement for each mode,
6. Find the target displacement,
7. Push the structure based on each modal load pattern according to its target displacement.
8. Combine the results based on the modal combination rules, such as SRSS.
m
mroof
mdS
mroof
2 2 2, 1 2 ...b SRSS b b bnV V V V
30/09/58
22
Dr. Pramin Norachan 43
Mode Period Sa Sd Φi Γi Target Disp Story Joint Dir Dir
Sec m/sec2 m m m Text Text Text Text
1 0.90 5.18 0.107 0.076 26.61 0.217 ROOF P1-7 Y U2
2 0.86 5.45 0.102 0.078 14.70 0.118 ROOF P3-7 Y U2
3 0.66 6.94 0.077 0.045 29.15 0.100 ROOF 184 X U1
4 0.33 8.93 0.024 0.089 7.22 0.015 ROOF P1-7 Y U2
5 0.30 8.93 0.020 0.086 8.56 0.015 ROOF P3-7 Y U2
6 0.23 8.93 0.011 0.044 10.12 0.005 ROOF 186 X U1
m
m
m
roofd
m roof
SPF
2
2
1 1
n n
m i im i imi i
W W W
2
2m m
md a
TS S g
m m mroof d m roofS
Dr. Pramin Norachan 44
12.48.2
13.710.9
34.3
27.1
16.2
9.2
68.6
54.0
28.4
15.0
0
20
40
60
80
X Y
Bas
e S
hear
(%
)
Along Direction
Base Shear Percentage in Total Weight of Building
Euivalent Statics
RSA-DBE(inelastic)
RSA-DBE(elastic)
MPA-DBE
RSA-MCE
MPA-MCE
Seismic weight of building at the ground level = 10,500 kN
2.4
3.6
MCE (Linear, RS)
MCE (Nonlinear, MPA)
xy
30/09/58
23
Dr. Pramin Norachan 45
1
2
3
4
5
6
‐4000 ‐2000 0 2000 4000
Story Level
Shear Force (KN)
Story Shear in X‐Direction
DBE
MCE
1
2
3
4
5
6
‐3000 ‐2000 ‐1000 0 1000 2000 3000
Story Level
Shear Force (KN)
Story Shear in Y‐Direction
DBE
MCE
xy
Dr. Pramin Norachan 46
Girder Rotation CriteriaMCE
No. %
ϴp < 0.005 (Good range) 219 98.6%
0.005< ϴp <0.01 (IO) 2 0.9%
0.01< ϴp <0.02 (LS) 1 0.5%
ϴp >0.02 (CP) 0 0.0%
Total 222 100.0%
It is found that two girders perform at the Immediate Occupancy (IO), and only a girder performs at the Life safety (LS). However, none of the girders are beyond the Collapse Prevention (CP).
The shear capacity of many girders seems to be adequate to resist the probable shear demand with 90% of D/C smaller than one
Girder Shear CriteriaMCE
No. %
DC<1 (Good range) 202 91.0%
1<DC<1.2 (Overstressed) 1 0.5%
1.2<DC<1.5 (Overstressed) 0 0.0%
DC>1.5 (Overstressed) 19 8.6%
Total 222 100.0%
30/09/58
24
Dr. Pramin Norachan 47
Shear D/C Ratios of Girders in Ground Level (MCE)
Shear D/C Ratios of Girders in Level 1 (MCE)
Dr. Pramin Norachan 48
Column PMM CriteriaMCE
No. %
DC<1 (Good range) 55 44.4%
1<DC<1.2 (Overstressed) 13 10.5%
1.2<DC<1.5 (Overstressed) 30 24.2%
DC>1.5 (Overstressed) 26 21.0%
Total 124 100.0%
Column Shear CriteriaMCE
No. %
DC<1 (Good range) 14 11.3%
1<DC<1.2 (Overstressed) 7 5.6%
1.2<DC<1.5 (Overstressed) 20 16.1%
DC>1.5 (Overstressed) 83 66.9%
Total 124 100.0%
Most columns have insufficient shear capacity to resist the shear demand for MCE levels. Therefore, it is recommended that the retrofit for shear capacity of these columns must be done.
In terms of axial-flexural interaction capacity, many columns are generally acceptable for DBE level while several columns seem to be overstressed under earthquakes at MCE level.
30/09/58
25
Dr. Pramin Norachan 49
The first fundamental mode is coupled both X and Y direction (torsion) due to unsymmetrical configuration of the building as expected.
ModeNatural Period
(s)UX UY RZ
1 0.90 2.0% 63.8% 20.9%
2 0.86 9.4% 19.5% 45.4%
3 0.67 76.6% 0.1% 14.7%
4 0.32 0.4% 4.7% 0.5%
5 0.30 0.3% 6.6% 9.3%
6 0.23 9.2% 0.0% 0.9%
Total 97.8% 94.7% 91.7%
Modal Participation Mass Ratios
Dr. Pramin Norachan 50
For repairing and strengthening of the existing building, three common strengthening techniques used by practical engineers, column jacketing, adding steel braces and adding new shear walls were used to improve the seismic performance of the existing building.
Then, the efficiency of each strengthening method was investigated on the basis of member strength and deformation.
30/09/58
26
Dr. Pramin Norachan 51
There are several options for the jacketing of concrete members which are element based strengthening techniques (local strengthening).
Usually, the exiting member is wrapped with a jacket of concrete reinforced with longitudinal steel bars and ties, or with weld wire fabric.
Based on this method, axial strength, bending strength, and stiffness of the original column are increased.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 52
Reinforcement concrete jacketing can be used as a repair of strengthening scheme. If there is damage in some of the existing members, they should be repaired before jacketing.
The details of concrete jacketing with longitudinal steel bars are illustrated in the following figure.
30/09/58
27
Dr. Pramin Norachan 53
Among the global strengthening methods, addition of RC shear walls is the most popular one. Many researchers have focused on the addition of RC shear walls and found that the installation of RC shear walls greatly improves lateral load capacity and stiffness of the structure.
In the strengthening method with shear walls, the existing partition walls in the building are removed and high strength reinforced concrete shear walls are built instead.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 54
In this method, shear walls have to be constructed the foundation level and there may not need to strengthen other components. The shear walls bear majority of the earthquake loads and limits the displacement behavior of the building.
30/09/58
28
Dr. Pramin Norachan 55
Under enormous cyclic forces during a seismic effect, Buckling Restrained Brace (BRB) which is system based strengthening techniques (global strengthening) devices can be used to increase the resistance of frame structures by providing energy dissipation and introducing nonlinear behavior.
Testing and evaluating are required for designing and ensuring quality control.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 56
The structures are susceptible to collapse or large lateral displacements due to earthquake ground motions and require special attention to limit the displacement. This displacement can be brought into limit by providing BRB in the structure.
30/09/58
29
Dr. Pramin Norachan 57
The existing building is increased stiffness by column jacketing, adding shear walls and BRB which is the main reason in reducing time period when compared with that of the existing building.
Shear wall and BRB can contribute more stiffness than column jacketing.
Mode Natural Period (s)
Original Jacketing SW BRB
1 0.90 0.76 0.43 0.52
2 0.85 0.72 0.39 0.50
3 0.66 0.54 0.30 0.41
4 0.32 0.25 0.17 0.18
5 0.30 0.24 0.15 0.18
6 0.22 0.18 0.15 0.16
Dr. Pramin Norachan 58
The pushover curves for all buildings in Y direction (weak direction) which represent the relationship between base shear and roof displacement are plotted in the following figure.
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
Base Shear (KN)
Roof Displacement (m)
Pushover Curves for Different Buildings
ExistingColumn JacketingSWBRB
The results show all strengthening methods increased the building base shear, while they reduced the maximum roof displacement.
The shear walls were more effective than other strengthening methods in this purpose.
In the term of ductility, the results show that column jacketing technique caused the highest ductility, while shear walls significantly reduced the ductility.
30/09/58
30
Dr. Pramin Norachan 59
Base shear resulting from modal pushover analysis (MPA) at MCE levels of different strengthened buildings are summarized in the following figure.
28.4
15.0
45.0
26.5
48.5
40.340.9
34.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
X Y
Base Shear (%
)
Along Direction
Base Shear Percentage in Total Weight of Building
MPA‐Existing MPA‐Jacketing MPA‐SW MPA‐BRB
Results showed that base shear of all strengthened buildings are increased approximately 1.5 times in X-direction and 2 times in Y-direction, respectively.
Column jacketing, adding shear walls and BRB cause the increase in the structural base shear because they contribute more stiffness to the existing building.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 60
1
2
3
4
5
6
‐6000 ‐4000 ‐2000 0 2000 4000 6000
Story Level
Shear Force (KN)
Story Shear in X‐Direction
Existing
Jacketing
SW
BRB
1
2
3
4
5
6
‐6000 ‐4000 ‐2000 0 2000 4000 6000
Story Level
Shear Force (KN)
Story Shear in Y‐Direction
Existing
Jacketing
SW
BRB
30/09/58
31
Dr. Pramin Norachan 61
0
1
2
3
4
5
-0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
Sto
ry L
evel
Displacement (m)
MPA - MCE - Story Displacement (X)
Original
Jacketing
SW
BRB
Limit(H/200)
0
1
2
3
4
5
-0.30 -0.20 -0.10 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30
Sto
ry L
evel
Displacement (m)
MPA - MCE - Story Displacement (Y)
Original
Jacketing
SW
BRB
Limit(H/200)
The story displacement and story drift for the buildings with shear walls (SW) and BRB are significantly decreased.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 62
Based on the results, the shear capacity of many girders seems to be adequate to resist the probable shear demand with approximately 90% of D/C smaller than one.
Even thought the seismic performance existing structure is improved by using column jacketing, adding shear wall or BRB, it cannot avoid shear failure in girders because girders are primary structure which are used to transfer loads to vertical members.
Thus, it is recommended that only some girders about 10% need to be strengthened to resist shear demand. The strengthening method can perform by using concrete girder jacketing or CFRP.
30/09/58
32
Dr. Pramin Norachan 63
In terms of shear capacity, for the building with column jacketing is the most effective method to resist shear demand under MCE earthquake level, while many columns of the other strengthened buildings seem to be insufficient to resist the shear demand.
Therefore, it is recommended that the retrofit for shear capacity of columns have to be provided for only few columns for the column jacketing building, while most columns of the other strengthened buildings need to be strengthened.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 64
The axial‐flexural interaction capacity of buildings with column jacketing, shear wall or BRB seem to be improved.
However, some columns need to be retrofitted to increase the capacity to resist these biaxial demand forces.
30/09/58
33
Dr. Pramin Norachan 65
Girders:
Flexural deformation of all girders generally acceptable for both DBE and MCE level earthquakes, while few girders seem to be inadequate to resist the demand forces at MCE level. However, the retrofitting for girder flexure is negligible. For girder shear capacity, only 10% of girders need to be strengthened to resist shear demand.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 66
Columns:
For shear capacity, most columns are insufficient to resist the shear demand for both earthquake levels. Thus, it is recommended almost all columns need to be strengthened to increase shear capacities.
30/09/58
34
Dr. Pramin Norachan 67
Columns:
Moreover, in terms of axial‐flexural interaction capacity, approximately 50% of columns seem to be overstressed under earthquakes at MCE level. Therefore, these columns need to be strengthened to resist the biaxial demand force.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 68
For strengthening of the existing building, three common strengthening techniques were used to improve the seismic performances of the existing building.
• Column jacketing (local strengthening approach)• Adding new shear walls, SW (global strengthening approach)• Adding bucking restrained braces, BRB (global strengthening approach)
With increase in the stiffness for all three strengthening methods, results show that the natural period of vibration of the building is reduced, while the base shear is increased.
The story displacement and story drift for the buildings with shear walls (SW) and BRB are significantly decreased.
30/09/58
35
Dr. Pramin Norachan 69
Shear and axial‐flexural interaction capacities of columns seem to be reduced because new shear walls and BRB can help to resist some shear demand. However, local strengthening is still required for both girders and columns.
However, in the case of the column jacketing, shears capacities of the girders and tension, compression, shear and axial‐flexural interaction capacities of columns seem to be adequate to resist demand forces under MCE earthquake level.
In conclusion, the results indicate that displacement at roof and story drift are within the limitation. Therefore, adding new shear walls and BRB may not be necessary because the local strengthening is still required for both girders and columns.
Moreover, in general, adding new shear walls are more expensive since additional foundation should be provided in this method. Therefore, based on these results, it might be concluded that the column jacketing is the most effective and the most economic strengthening method for this building. However, there are still 16% of girders that need to be strengthened to increase their shear capacity.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 70
In addition, to verify the accuracy of modal pushover method (MPA), time-history analysis (THA) was also carried for comparison of the base shear.The existing building and the strengthened building including BRB were selected for this comparison. The results show that the base shear based on modal pushover is slightly different from that based on time-history analysis.
The ground motions used for time-history analysis are scaled to match with the target response spectrum for MCE earthquake level.
‐0.10
‐0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Ground Acceleration
(g)
Time (sec)
1776
1776‐FN 1776‐FP
(1) Target Spectrum(2) Searching for ground motions (3) Scaling
ground motions to the target
spectrum
(4) Using scaled ground motions for time-history analysis
30/09/58
36
Dr. Pramin Norachan 71
‐0.2
0.0
0.2
0 5 10 15 20 25Ground
Acceleration (g)
Time (sec)
719
719‐FN 719‐FP
‐0.1
0.0
0.1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Ground
Acceleration (g)
Time (sec)
792
792‐FN 792‐FP
‐0.5
0.0
0.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Ground Acceleration
(g)
Time (sec)
949
949‐FN 949‐FP‐0.40
‐0.20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Ground Acceleration
(g)
Time (sec)
988
988‐FN 988‐FP
‐0.20
‐0.10
0.00
0.10
0.20
0 10 20 30 40 50
Ground Acceleration
(g)
Time (sec)
1034
1034‐FN 1034‐FP‐0.50
0.00
0.50
0 5 10 15 20 25 30Ground Acceleration
(g)
Time (sec)
184
184‐FN 184‐FP
‐0.10
0.00
0.10
0 10 20 30 40 50 60Ground
Acceleration (g)
Time (sec)
1776
1776‐FN
1776‐FP
Dr. Pramin Norachan 72
28.4
15.0
27.0
17.6
40.9
34.4
41.6
35.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
X Y
Base Shear (%)
Along Direction
Base Shear Percentage in Total Weight of Building
MPA‐ExistingTHA‐ExistingMPA‐BRBTHA‐BRB
Comparison of base shear at the ground level between modal Pushover (MPA) and time history analysis (THA) for the existing building (Original) and the strengthened building using BRB
30/09/58
37
Dr. Pramin Norachan 73
38,537
24,840
39167
26911
4931044302
51090
37461
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
X Y
Moment (kN‐m
)
Along Direction
Comparison of Moment
MPA‐Existing
THA‐Existing
MPA‐BRB
THA‐BRB
Comparison of base moment at the ground level between modal Pushover (MPA) and time history analysis (THA) for the existing building (Original) and the strengthened building using BRB
30/09/58
38
Dr. Pramin Norachan 75
Seismic Performance Evaluation of Lal Durbar Convention Center building of Yak and Yeti Hotel, Kathmandu, Nepal, 18 April 2013.
Lal Durbar Convention Centre (LDCC) building was constructed in 1999. It is a four-story building with one basement.
Dr. Pramin Norachan 76
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0
Spectral A
cceleration, Sa (g)
Natural Period (s)
Response Spectra
DBE
MCE
T1T2T3T4T5T6
This seismic zone provides the response spectrum approximately equivalent to that for seismic zone V, mentioned in IS 1893:2002. DBE elastic level response spectrum is approximately increased from the value of DBE inelastic level response spectrum by 2.5 times. In addition, the factor 2 is used so as to increase DBE elastic level response spectrum to MCE level response spectrum.
30/09/58
39
Dr. Pramin Norachan 77
The proposed shear wall locations The revised shear wall locations
Dr. Pramin Norachan 78
The proposed shear wall locations
30/09/58
40
Dr. Pramin Norachan 79
The revised shear wall locations
Dr. Pramin Norachan 80
Nonlinear Components- Shear walls (layered shell)- Columns (Fiber hinges)- Girders (Moment hinges)
Linear Component- Slab
30/09/58
41
Dr. Pramin Norachan 81
Section (1)
Unconfined concrete
Confined concrete
Confined concrete
Section (2)
Section (3)
Steel
As1
As2
As3
Dr. Pramin Norachan 82
Top bar
Bottom bar
ConcreteSection (1)
SECTION 1
30/09/58
42
Dr. Pramin Norachan 83
12.2 12.5
30.5 31.2
22.6 23.5
61.0 62.3
36.639.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
X Y
Base Shear (%
)
Along Direction
Base Shear Percentage in Total Weight of Building
RSA‐DBE(inelastic)
RSA‐DBE
MPOA‐DBE
RSA‐MCE
MPOA‐MCE
Seismic weight of building at the ground level = 71,300 kN
1.7 1.6
MCE (Linear, RS)
MCE (Nonlinear, MPA)
Dr. Pramin Norachan 84
A
Formation of Plastic Hinges for the First Mode of Modal Pushover Analysis (MCE level) with the Target Displacement 9.0 cm.
30/09/58
43
Dr. Pramin Norachan 85
Dr. Pramin Norachan 86
30/09/58
44
Dr. Pramin Norachan 88
The Roxas Triangle Tower is located in Paseo de Roxas St, Makati City, Philippines. It is a high-rise residential tower, which is 55-story high-rise building with 4-story of below grade parking. The building is reinforced concrete building. The lateral forces are mainly resisted by the reinforced concrete structure core built around the elevator shaft and special moment resisting frames connecting the core.
30/09/58
45
Dr. Pramin Norachan 89
Dr. Pramin Norachan 90
Sample Backbone Curve for Unconfined Concrete
Sample Backbone Curve for Confined Concrete
Sample Backbone Curve for Reinforcement Steel
30/09/58
46
Dr. Pramin Norachan 91
Nonlinear fiber sections of shear walls
Shear hinge of coupling beam
Dr. Pramin Norachan 92
3.43%2.73%2.61%
2.20%
8.72%
7.42%
17.39%
14.84%
8.51% 8.21%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
X Y
Base Shear (%)
Along Direcrtion
Base Shear Percentage of Total Weight of Building
Wind*1.6(CODE)
Service
RSA‐DBE
RSA‐MCE
NLTHA‐MCE
2.0 1.8
MCE (Linear, RS)
MCE (Nonlinear, THA)
30/09/58
47
Dr. Pramin Norachan 93
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
‐0.006 ‐0.004 ‐0.002 0.000 0.002 0.004
Story Level
Axial Strain (mm/mm)
Wall Axial Strain (SW7, S18)
ARC
DAY
HRC
LCN
SCE
STG
TCU
Average
Steel YieldingStrain
Max. Comp.Strain Limit
Dr. Pramin Norachan 94
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
‐30000 ‐20000 ‐10000 0 10000 20000 30000
Story Level
Shear Force (KN)
Wall Shear (SW5‐2)
AJC
LGP
PER
STG
STL
TAB
UNIO
Average
Capacity
MaximumLimit Capacity
30/09/58
48
Dr. Pramin Norachan 95
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
‐30000 ‐20000 ‐10000 0 10000 20000 30000
Story Level
Shear Force (KN)
Wall Shear (SW5‐2)
AJC
LGP
PER
STG
STL
TAB
UNIO
Average
Capacity
MaximumLimitCapacity
Questions and Answers
Recommended