View
0
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
LCAP MetricStudent Performance
Summary
White
Two or More
Hispanic or Latino
African AmericanAsian
Other
Demographics
State and Local IndicatorsLocal Control
FundingFormula Priority
State Indicator Local Indicator
Priority 1 Basics Conditions at SchoolPriority 2 Implementationof StateAcademic StandardsPriority 3 Parent EngagementPriority 4 Academic Indicator
English Learner IndicatorPriority 5 Chronic Absence Indicator
Graduation Rate IndicatorPriority 6 SuspensionRate Indicator Local Climate SurveyPriority 7 College/Career IndicatorPriority 8 College/Career IndicatorPriority 9 Coordination of Services for Expelled
Students (COEs* only)Priority 10 Coordination of Services for Foster Youth
(COEs* only)*COE – County Office of Education
State-Defined Metrics
• CAASPP• Chronic Absentee Rate• Suspension Rate• Graduation Rate• Dropout Rate• UC A-G Completion• EL growth and proficiency per the CELDT• EL reclassification
Locally-Defined Metrics• AP Exam Scores• 2.5 GPA or Higher• Enrollment in CP and H• Grades 3-5 ELA and math benchmarks• Grades 3-5 SRI Lexile• Grades 6-8 math benchmarks• Co-Curricular Activity Participation• Fully credentialed and Highly Qualified Teachers• Maintain Staffing ratios• Maintain or exceed facilities standards on Facilities
Inspection Tool process
Increase passing rates:• CAASPP• AP Exams• A-G requirements• 2.5 GPA or Higher
Maintain:• Fully credentialed and Highly Qualified Teachers• Staffing ratios• Maintain or exceed facilities standards on Facilities
Inspection Tool process
Goal 1: Enhance the Culture and Conditions that Optimize Learning for All Students
Students scoring standard met or higher per the SMARTER Balanced Assessment in English Language Arts
Student Performance Summary
2015 2016 2017Overall 64% 67% 67%African American 48% 47% 57%Asian 86% 88% 88%Hispanic/Latino 37% 42% 41%White 70% 74% 74%Two or More 78% 78% 78%Low Income 36% 39% 38%English Learner 10% 13% 15%Special Education 18% 21% 20%
Students scoring standard met or higher per the Smarter Balanced Assessment in Mathematics
Student Performance Summary
2015 2016 2017Overall 57% 58% 59%African American 43% 40% 48%Asian 84% 86% 87%Hispanic/Latino 29% 31% 31%White 63% 66% 66%Two or More 71% 74% 73%Low Income 26% 28% 28%English Learner 12% 14% 15%Special Education 13% 14% 14%
Advanced Placement (AP) Scores
Student Performance Summary
CVUSD 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Enrollment, grades 9-12 7,552 7,509 7,687 7,789 7,619 7,683 7,508 7,465 7,365 7,142
Total AP Students 1,640 1,709 1,866 1,971 2,025 2,116 2,161 2,166 2,243 2,229
% of Enrollment 21.7% 22.8% 24.3% 25.3% 26.6% 27.5% 28.8% 29.0% 30.5% 31.2%
Number of Exams 3,157 3,395 3,833 4,146 4,469 4,478 4,490 4,570 4,611 4,741
% of AP Students Passing 72.2% 78.8% 78.8% 79.5% 83.2% 82.9% 80.2% 80.3% 78.0% 81.6%State
% of AP Students Passing 62.8% 64.4% 64.2% 63.7% 64.4% 63.5% 64.3% 63.5% 62.3% 62.1%Global
% of AP Students Passing 60.1% 61.1% 60.2% 60.2% 61.4% 60.9% 61.3% 60.6% 60.2% 60.3%
Percentage of AP exams with a score of 3 or higher
Student Performance Summary
Student Group 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
District-Wide 80.2% 78.5% 78.9% 78.1% 77.8%
Low Income 71.8% 66.5% 71.9% 68.8% 64.2%
Special Education 85.0% 66.7% 58.3% 70.0% 64.5%
English Learners 73.3% 57.1% 75.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Percentage of AP exams with a score of 3 or higher
Student Performance Summary
Student Group 2015-16 2016-17
District-Wide 78% 78%
African American 61% 63%
Asian 87% 86%
Hispanic or Latino 72% 68%
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander 71% 72%
Two or More Races 81% 84%
White 77% 76%
Students completing A-G requirements
Student Performance Summary
Student Group 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
District-Wide 50.3% 53.2% 57.2% 55.7% 59.5%
Low Income 14.5% 26.3% 27.0% 28.8% 30.3%
Special Education 4.0% 2.8% 6.1% 3.3% 6.7%
English Learners 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Students in grades 7-8 with a cumulative GPA of 2.5 or higher
Students in grades 9-12 with a cumulative GPA of 2.5 or higher
Student Performance Summary
Student Group 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17District-Wide 79.9% 82.1% 82.3% 83.8% 83.1%Low Income 55.6% 58.9% 62.9% 59.3% 57.7%Special Education 70.5% 72.0% 69.0% 70.7% 68.6%English Learners 47.1% 46.2% 26.3% 31.8% 40.2%
Student Group 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
District-Wide 74.5% 78.1% 77.4% 77.9% 79.8%Low Income 47.0% 51.5% 58.4% 58.6% 54.3%Special Education 58.6% 62.7% 57.9% 67.3% 64.5%English Learners 26.7% 32.4% 18.6% 31.3% 44.6%
Increase:• Enrollment in CP and H• 2.5 GPA or Higher • Pass rate on AP exams• EL growth and proficiency per the CELDT• EL reclassification• Grades 3-5 ELA and math benchmarks• Grades 3-5 SRI Lexile• Grades 6-8 math benchmarks• HS graduation rate
Decrease HS dropout rate
Goal 2: Maximize student achievement through highly effective instruction that includes opportunities for academic acceleration and intervention
Student Performance Summary
EL Students 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Achieving one or more levels of growth per the annual CELDT
41.4% 48.7% 40.7% 45.9% 48.3%
Scoring proficient or higher per the CELDT 40.4% 38.9% 41.5% 43.7% 47.0%
Reclassified to Fluent English Proficient 13.3% 18.5% 17.3% 18.5% 18.1%
Annual Graduation Rate (Grade 12)
Annual Dropout Rate (Grades 9-12)
Student Performance Summary
Student Group 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17District-Wide 99.3% 99.0% 97.5% 98.1% 97.1%Low Income 96.6% 97.1% 94.0% 95.0% 94.9%Special Education 98.8% 97.5% 87.2% 94.1% 90.7%English Learners 100% 84.6% 60.7% 70.6% 100%
Student Group 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17District-Wide 0.55% 0.65% 0.63% 0.35% 0.24%Low Income 0.88% 1.86% 1.56% 0.89% 0.61%Special Education 0.45% 1.03% 1.19% 0.15% 0.15%English Learners 0.0% 6.31% 1.81% 4.04% 3.01%
Increase:• Co-Curricular Activity Participation• HS graduation rate
Decrease: • HS dropout rate• Suspension rate
Goal 3: Engage Students Through Quality Student Activities
Student Suspension Rate
School Climate
Student Group 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
District-Wide 2.60% 2.59% 2.00% 1.72% 1.56%
Low Income 5.80% 4.29% 4.34% 3.88% 3.39%
Special Education 6.37% 7.02% 6.40% 5.62% 4.67%
English Learners 5.68% 3.99% 2.05% 2.03% 2.15%
Percent of High School Students Participating in At Least One Co-Curricular Activity
School Climate
Student Group 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
District-Wide 59.7% 61.4% 58.2% 44.9% 59.6%
Low Income 42.2% 46.7% 49.2% 35.9% 40.7%
Special Education 39.2% 41.5% 37.3% 31.3% 39.4%
English Learners 25.7% 32.0% 13.1% 15.2% 24.4%
State LocalMet
Not Met
Not Met for Two or MoreYears
Performance determined by state based on reference charts
Performance determined by LEA based on state-
created standards
The California School DashboardState versus Local Performance
Locally-Defined Metrics• AP Exam Scores• 2.5 GPA or Higher• Enrollment in CP and H• Grades 3-5 ELA and math benchmarks• Grades 3-5 SRI Lexile• Grades 6-8 math benchmarks• Co-Curricular Activity Participation• Fully credentialed and Highly Qualified Teachers• Maintain Staffing ratios• Maintain or exceed facilities standards on
Facilities Inspection Tool process
Local Indicator Measurement
• The State Board of Education approved standards and self-reflection rubrics for the local indicators that support LEAs inmeasuring and reporting their progress within the appropriatepriority area. The approved standards require the LEA to:
◦ Annually measure its progress.
◦ Report the results at a regularly scheduled public meeting of the local governing board.
◦ Upload and publicly report results through the Dashboard.
◦ To demonstrate that the standard is met on a local indicator is based on whether the LEA collected and reported performance data for each local indicator.
26
Stakeholder Meeting• Priority 1 – Basic Conditions at School• Priority 2 – Implementation of State Academic Standards• Priority 3 – Parent Engagement• Priority 6 – Local Climate SurveyThe Conejo Valley Unified School District has met standards in the California School Dashboard Local Indicators.
27
Recommended