View
272
Download
2
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 1
I. INTRODUCTION Definition of Law Classification of Law Concept of Law as “Derecho” and “Ley” Human Positive Law Branches of Human Positive Law Definition of Civil Law Civil Code of the Philippines Sources Effectivity of the Civil Code of the Philippines
Lara v. Del Rosario, 94 Phil. 778 II. EFFECT AND APPLICATION OF LAWS A. Effectivity of Laws Art. 2 as amended by E.O. 200, 18 June 1987
Tanada v. Tuvera, 136 S 27 and 146 S 446
Phil. International Trading Corp. v. Angeles, 21 October 1996
Phil. Veterans Bank Employees Union v. Hon. Vega, 28 June 2001
Honasan, III vs. The Panel of Investigating Prosecutors of the DOJ, 427 SCRA 46
ASTEC vs. ERB, GR No. 192117, 18 Sept. 2012 (Exceptions) B. Ignorantia Legis Non Excusat Art. 3 Concept Application Exceptions “Processual Presumption”
Yao Kee v. Sy Gonzales, 167 S 736
Board of Commissioners v. Dela Rosa, 197 S 853
Laureano v. CA, 2 February 2000 C. Lex prospicit, Non Respicit Art. 4 Basis and Purpose Exceptions
Aruego, Jr. v. CA, 254 S 711
Bernabe v. Alejo, 21 January 2002 D. Mandatory / Prohibitory Laws Defined General Rule on Effect of Violation Exceptions E. Waiver of Rights Art. 6 Rights Defined Waiver
Guy v. CA, 502 S 151
People v. Morial, 15 August 2001 F. Judicial Application and Interpretation of Laws Art. 8 The Philippine Legal System, Background
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 2
Stare Decisis Non Quieta Movere
Ting v. Ting, 31 March 2009
Landbank v. Pagayatan, et. al., GR No. 177190, 23 Feb. 2011 (When stare decisis does not apply)
“Law of the Case”
Ayala Corp., v. Rosa Diana Realty, 1 December 2000 Ratio Decidendi Obiter Dictum
Villanueva v. CA, 19 March 2002 G. Rules on Application and Interpretation of Laws Arts. 9 Dura Lex Sed Lex
Pp. v. Veneracion, 249 S 251
Duty of the Court to Render Judgment Effect of Silence, Obscurity or Insufficiency of Laws Judicial Aids Cessante Ratione Cessat Ipsa Lex in Criminal Law Art. 10 Legislative Intent Presumption “Interpret not by letter that killeth but by the spirit that giveth life”
Phil. Rabbit Bus Lines v. Arciaga, 148 S 438
Cesario Ursua v. CA, 10 April 1996 Art. 13 Computation of Periods Year, Month, Day, Night
CIR v. Primetown, 28 August 2007
Labad v. University of Southern Phil., 9 August 2001 H. Applicability of Customs Arts. 11 and 12 Custom, Defined Requisites Custom Proper Legem v. Custom Contra Legem I. How Laws Lose Their Effectivity Art. 7 Lapse of a Law, Defined Repeal, Meaning Express Repeal and Implied Repeal, Distinguished Effect of Repeal of Repealing Law on Law First Repealed
CIR v. Primetown, 28 August 2007
Labad v. University of Southern Phil., 9 August 2001 J. Binding Effect of Laws Art. 14, in relation to Art. 2, Revised Penal Code Territoriality and Generality Exceptions Ex-territoriality Extra-territoriality
Assali v. Commissioner of Customs, 26 S 382
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 3
K. Theory of Statutes Art. 15 and Art. 17, par. 3 Persons: Nationality Principle
Recio v. Recio, 2 October 2001
Llorente v. CA, 23 November 2000
Van Dorn v. Romillo, 139 S 139 Art. 16 Property: Lex Rei Sitae (Mobilia Sequntur Personam abandoned) Exception: Succession Domicillary Theory Renvoi
Aznar v. Garcia, 7 S 95
Bellis v. Bellis, 20 S 358
PCIB v. Excolin, 56 S 266 Art. 17, pars. 1 and 2 Forms and Solemnities of Contracts and Wills (Extrinsic Validity): Lex Loci Celebrationis
American Airlines v. Court of appeals, 9 March 2000. L. Suppletory Application of the Civil Code of the Philippines III. HUMAN RELATIONS
Right and Obligation, Defined A. Standards / Norms of Human Conduct Art. 19 Theory of Abuse of Rights
Go v. Cordero, 4 May 2010
Principio v. Barrientos, 478 S 639
Villanueva v. Rosqueta, 19 January 2010 Requirements for Actionable Wrong Damages, Concepts and Kinds
Manuel v. People, 476 S 639
University of the East v. Jader, 17 February 2000
Cruz v. NLRC, 7 February 2000
Globe McKay v. Barrios, 119 S 461
RCPI v. CA, 143 S 657 “Damnum Absque Injuria” / “Volenti Non Fit Injuria”
Hotel Nikko v. Reyes, 452 S 532 B. Liability Ex-Maleficio or Ex-Delicto Art. 20 in rel. to Art. 100 of the Revised Renal Code Acts Contrary to Law C. Acts Contrary to Morals, Good Customs or Public Policy Art. 21 Coverage Breach of Promise to Marry: When Actionable
Hermosisima v. CA, 109 P 629
Galang v CA, 4 S 55
Gashem Shookat Baksh v. CA, 219 S 115
Wassmer V. Velez, 12 S 648
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 4
D. Unjust Enrichment
Arts. 22 and 23 Action in Rem Verso and Solutio Indebiti, Distinguished Restitution as a Remedy Damages Recoverable
Car Cool Phil. v. USHIO Realty, 479 S 404
Puyat v. Zabarte, 26 February 2001
Elegir vs. PAL, GR No. 181995, 16 July 2012
GSIS, et al vs. COA, et. al., GR No. 181995, 16 July 2012 E. Unfair Competition Art. 24, In Contractual Relations Parens Patriae Doctrine Art. 28, In Industrial, Agricultural and Commercial Enterprises, Inc. Labor F. Thoughtless Extravagance Art. 25, Injunctive Remedy When and To Whom Available G. Respect for Personality and Dignity of Others Art. 26 Right to Privacy, Defined Constitutional and Statutory Basis of Right to Privacy Prying into the Privacy of Another’s Residence Alienation of Affections Humiliation on account of Religious Belief, Station in Life, Physical Defects, etc.
Concepcion v. CA, 31 January 2000 H. Neglect or Refusal of Public Servant Art. 27 Liability for Damages: Requisites Non-Feasance, Misfeasance Distinguished
Amonoy v. Spouses Gutierrez, 15 February 2001 I. Action for Damages based on Crime / Delict Arts. 20, 29, 30 and 35 in rel. to Art. 100 of Revised Penal Code Rule 111, Section 1, 2000 Rules of Criminal Procedure Proof of Guilt beyond Reasonable Doubt v. Preponderance of Evidence Separate Civil Action Necessity of Reservation Suspension of Separate Civil Action Rule 111, section 2, 2000 Rules of Criminal Procedure Effect of Acquittal in the Criminal Case upon Civil Liability
Guaring v. CA, 269 S 283
Manantan v. CA, 29 January 2001
J. Independent Civil Actions
Concept and Rationale Evidence Required
Art. 31, Civil Action based on Other Sources of Obligation except Crime: Law, Contract, Quasi-Contract
Bonite v. Zosa, 162 S 173
Pp. v. Bayotas, 236 S 239
Mansion Biscuits v. CA, 23 November 1995
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 5
Art. 32, Civil Liability for Violation of Constitutional Rights Persons Responsible When Responsibility Demandable from a Judge
Cojuanco v. CA, 2 July 1999
Alcuaz v. PSBA, 161 S 7 compared with
Non v. Dames, 185 S 523 Art. 33, Civil Liability for Declaration, Fraud, Physical Injusries Meaning
Arafiles v. Philippine Journalists, 25 March 2004
International Flavors v. Argo, 10 Sept. 2001
Marcia v. CA, 120 S 7
Ruiz v. Ucol, 153 S 14 Art. 34, Civil Liability of Member of Municipal or City Police Principal Liability of Member of Police Subsidiary Liability of City / Municipality Arts. 2176-2177, Quasi-Delict Concept of Quasi-Delict or Culpa Aquiliana Tort, defined
Barredo v. Garcia, 73 P 607
Jose v. CA, 18 January 2000 K. Prejudicial Questions Defined Art. 36, in rel. to Rule 111, Secs. 6-7 of 2000 Rules of Criminal Procedure Elements Effect
Beltran v. People, 20 June 2000
City of Pasig v. COMELEC, 10 September 1999
Diaz v. Merced, 109 P 155
Donato v. Luna, 160 S, 441 IV. PERSONS AND PERSONALITY Art. 37, Juridical Capacity and Capacity to Act, Distinguished Classes of Persons A. Natural Persons Civil Personality Art. 40, Presumptive Civil Personality Geluz v. CA, 2 S 801 Art. 41, Birth Legal Conditions Art. 38-39, Restrictions or Modifications on Capacity to Act
Catalan v. Basa, 31 July 2007
Domingo v. CA, 17 October 2001
Mendezona v. Ozamiz, 6 February 2002 Art. 42, Death Effects of Death
Pp. v. Bayotas, 236 S 239
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 6
Art. 43, Survivorship Presumptions on Survivorship
Geluz vs. CA, 2 SCRA 8 B. Juridical Persons Theory of Special Capacities Art. 44, Classification Art. 45, Governing Law Art. 46, Powers, in rel. to Art. 12, Sections 2-3 of the 1987 Constitution V. DOMICILE Defined Distinguished from Residence Kinds of Domicile: Origin, COntructive and Choice Arts. 50-51
Romualdez-Marcos v. COMELEC, 248 S 300 VI. MARRIAGE Family Code of the Philippines Effectivity Date Retroactive Application
Aruego Jr. v. CA, 254 S 711
Bernabe v. Alejo, 21 January 2002 Marriage Defined Art. 1 in rel. to Art. XV, 1987 Constitution Nature of the Contract of Marriage
Estrada v. Escritor, 408 S 1 Ancheta v. Ancheta, 4 March 2004 Pp. v. Corpus, 85 S 567 Rivera v. IAC, 182 S 322 Abadilla v. Tabiliran, 249 S 447
Presumption in Favor of Existence and Validity of Marriage
Dela Rosa v. Heirs, 480 S 334 Eugenio v. Velez, 185 S 425 Garcia vda. De Chua v. CA, 5 March 1998
A. REQUISITES OF A VALID MARRIAGE Essential Requisites 1. Legal Capacity Art. 2, par. 1 in rel. to Arts. 1, 5, Art. 35, par. 1 and Art. 26, par. 1 Marrying Age under Family Code as compared to the Civil Code Sex / Status of Same- Sex Marriages
RP v. Silverio, 22 October 2017
RP v. Cagandahan, 12 September 2008 Absence of other Legal Impediment, Arts. 37-38
Donato v. Luna, 160 S 14
Weigel v. Sempio DIy, 143 S 499
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 7
Atienza v. Brillantes, 29 March 1995 2. Consent Art. 2, par. 2 in rel. to Art. 6 How Given Formal Requisites: 1. Authority of the Solemnizing Officer Art. 3, par. 1 and Art. 7 Sec. 444, R.A. 7160 or the Local Government Code Art. 35, par. 2, Effect of Good Faith
Beso v. Judge Duguman, 28 January 2000 2. Valid Marriage License Art. 3, par. 2 in rel. to Arts. 9-21 and Arts. 27-34 Purpose of the Marriage License Probative Value of Marriage License
Requirements for Application Parental Consent, When necessary Parental Advice, When necessary Publication / Posting Requirement Duty of Local Civil Registrar to Issue Suspension of the Issuance of the Marriage License Validity Period of Marriage License
Alcantara v. Alcantara, 28 August 2007
Sevilla v. Cardenas, 494 S 1
Aranes v. Occiano, 380 S 402
Vda. De Jacob v CA, 312 S 772
Trinidad v. Trinidad , 20 April 1998
Republic v. CA, 2 September 1994
Sy v. CA, 330 S 550
Carino v. Carino, 351 S 127 3. Marriage Ceremony Art. 3, par. 3 in rel. to Arts. 6 and 8 Prescribed Form or Rite Proxy Marriage
Morigo v. People, 422 S 376 Absence, Defect or Irregularity in the Requisites Effect of Absence of Essential and Formal Requisites Art. 4, par. 1 in rel. to Art. 35, par. 3 and Arts. 27-34 Effect of Defect in Essential Requisites Art. 4 par. 2 in rel. to Art. 45 Effect of Irregularity in Formal Requisites Art. 4, par. par. 3 Three-Fold Liability Art. 352, Revised Penal Code
Morena v. Bernabe, 14 July 1995
Navarro v. Dumagtoy, 259 S 129 (19 July 1996) Marriage Certificate Art. 6 in rel. to Art. 22-24 Purpose and Value of Marriage Certificate Who Issues Distribution of Copies Distinguished from the Marriage License B. MARRIAGES CELEBRATED OUTSIDE THE PHILIPPINES
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 8
Art. 26, par. 1 in rel. to Arts. 15 and 17, par. 3 of the Civil Code DOJ Opinion No. 11 (17 January 1990) Lex Loci Celebrationis Rule Exceptions, Art. 35, pars. 1, 4, 5, 6, Art. 36-38 C. FOREIGN DIVORCE Art. 26, par. 2 in rel. to Arts. 15 and 17, par. 3 of the Civil Code History of Provision Effects of Foreign Divorce Conditions for Recognition of Foreign Divorce in the Philippines
Corpuz v. Sto. Tomas and the Solicitor General, 11 August 2010
San Luis v. San Luis, 514 S 294
RP v. Iyoy, 21 Sept. 2005
Recio v. Recio, 2 October 2001
Quita v. CA, 300 S 406
RP v. Orbecido III, 472 S 114
Van Dorn v. Romillo, 139 S 139
Pilapil v. Ibay-Somera, 30 June 1989
Tenchaves v. Escano, 15 S 355 D. VOID AB INITIO MARRIAGES Void and VOIDABLE Marriages, Distinguished Declaration of Nullity and Divorce, Distinguished Arts. 35, 36, 37, 38, 44, 53 Art. 350, Revised Penal Code I. Contract by Parties Below 18 Years of Age Art. 35 (1) in rel. to Art. 5 and Art. 26, par. 1 Rule applicable to both parties 2. Contract Solemnized by Person without Authority Art. 35 (2) in rel. to Art. 7 Art. 352, Revised Penal Code
Moreno v. Bernabe, 14 July 1995
Navarro v. Dumagtoy, 259 S 129 (19 July 1996) 3. Contract without a Marriage License Art. 35 (3) in rel. to Arts. 27-34
Abbas vs. Abbas, 30 January 2013
Alcantara v. Alcantara, 28 August 2007
Sevilla v. Cardenas, 31 July 2006
Mallion v. Alcantara, 31 October 2006
Cojuanco, Sr. v. Palma, 438 S 306
Carino v. Carino, 2 February 2001
Trinidad v. Trinidad, 20 April 1998
Atienza v. Brillantes, 29 March 1995 EXCEPTION: Marriages under Exceptional Circumstances Arts. 27 – 34 in rel. to Art. 3, par. 2 and Art. 35, par. 3 Status of the Marriage under Exceptional Circumstances Duty of Solemnizing Officer Marriage in Articulo Mortis
Arts. 27, 29-32 Who May Solemnize, Art. 7 Effect of Survival of Party Marriage in Remote Place Arts. 28-29
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 9
Marriage among Muslims or members of ethnic / indigenous cultural communities Arts. 33 in rel. to R.A. 8371 or the Indigenous People’s Rights Act Convalidation of Cohabitation Art. 34 Period of Cohabitation Absence of Legal Impediment
Manzano v. Sanchez, 354 S 1
Ninal v. Bayadog, 14 March 2000
Sy v. CA, 330 S 550
Cosca v. Palaypayon, 237 S 249 4. Bigamous / Polygamous Marriages Art. 35 (4) in rel. to rel. to Arts. 41 and 44
Jarillo vs. People of the Philippines, 29 September 2009
Macarrubo, 27 February 2004
Tenebro v. CA, 423 S 272
Quita v. CA, 300 S 406
Mijares v. Villa Luz, 274 S 1
Wiegel v. Sempio Diy, 143 S 499
Balogbog v. Balogbog, 7 March 1997
Tamano v. Ortiz, 29 June 1998 EXCEPTION: Valid Bigamous Marriage Arts. 41-44 in rel. to Arts. 381 and 384, Civil Code of the Philippines Presumptive Death / Absence Requisites for Declaration of Presumptive Death
Republic v. Narceda, 10 April 2013
SSS v. Jarque Vda. De Bailon, 485 SCRA 376
Republic v. CA, 477 S 277
Republic v. Bernudes, 449 S 57
Republic v. Nolasco, 17 March 1993
Bienvenido v. CA, 237 S 676
Manuel v. People, 476 S 461
Calisterio v. Calisterio, 330 S 201 Arts. 43-44, Effects of Subsequent Marriage Art. 42, Termination of Subsequent Marriage 5. Contract by Mistake in Identity Art. 35 (5) Mistake defined Effect of Other Misrepresentation 6. Contract in violation of Arts. 40, 52-53 Arts. 35 (6) in rel. to Arts. 40, 52-53 Distinguished from Bigamous / Polygamous Marriage Recording of Judgement of Nullity or Annulment Recording of Delivery of Presumptive Legitimes
Carino v. Carino, 2 February 2001
Mercado v. Tan, 1 August 2000
Atienza v. Brillantes, 29 March 1995
Domingo v. CA, 226 S 572
Beltran v. People, 334 S 106 7. Incestuous Marriages
Art. 37 in rel. to Arts. 5 and 26, par. 1
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 10
Computation of Blood Relationships Degrees of Relationship Direct Line and Collateral Line, Defined Rationale for the Ban on Incestuous Marriages
8. Quasi-Incestuous Marriages / Void by Reasons of Public Policy Art. 38 in rel to Arts. 5 and 26, par. 1
Prohibited Marriages bet. Collateral Relatives; Relatives by Affinity; and Adoptive relatives Rationale
9. Psychological Incapacity
Art. 36 in rel. to Art. 2, Canon 1095 of the New Code of Canon Law History of Provision Psychological Incapacity and Insanity, Distinguished Psychological Incapacity and Vice of Consent, Distinguished Characteristics of Psychological Incapacity
Chi Ming Tsoi v. CA and Lao, 266 S 324 (17 January 1997)
Santos v. CA, 240 S 20 Guidelines in Determining Psychological Incapacity
Republic v. CA and Olaviano, 268 S 198 (13 February 1997) Evolution of Jurisprudence on Psychological Incapacity
Republic v. Encelan, 9 January 2013
Mendoza v. Republic, 12 November 2012
Republic v. CA, GR no. 159594, 12 November 2012
Ochosa v. Alano and RP, 26 January 2011
Yambao v. Republic, 24 January 2011
Marable v. Marable, 17 January 2011
Agraviador v. Agraviador, 8 December 2010
Ligeralde v. Patalinghug, et al., 15 April 2010
Reyes v. Reyes, 18 August 2010
Toring v. Toring and RP, 3 August 2010
Suazo v. Suazo and RP, 12 March 2010
Alcazar v. Alcazar, 13 October 2009
Najera v. Najera, 3 July 2009
Te v. Te, 13 February 2009
Paras v. Paras, August 2, 2007
Zamora v. CA, 7 February 2007
Ferraris v. Ferraris, 495 S 396
Antonio v. Reyes, 10 March 2006
RP v. Iyoy, 21 September 2005
Siayngco v. Siayngco, 4 October 2004
Villalon v. Villalon, 475 S 572
Buenaventura v. CA, 454 S 261
Barcelona v. CA, 412 S 41
RP v. Hamano, 428 S 735
Macarrubo v. Macarrubo, 424 S 42
Dedel v. CA, 29 January 2004
Republic v. Dagdag, 351 S 425
Pesca v. Pesca, 17 April 2001
Marcos v. Marcos, 19 October 2000
Hernandez v. CA, 8 December 1999 Action for Declaration of Nullity of Marriage Art. 48 in rel. to A.M No. 02-11-10-SC Who May Bring
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 11
Enrico v. Heirs, 534 S 418 as compared to
Catalan v. CA, 6 February 2007 and
Ninal v. Bayadog, 14 March 2000 as clarified in
Ablaza v. Republic, 11 August 2010
Carlos v. Sandoval, 16 December 2008 Prescriptive Period Art. 39
Mallion v. Alcantara, 506 S 336 Appearance of the State / Prohibition vs. Default Judgment Art. 48
Maquilan v. Maquilan, 8 June 2007
RP v. Cuison-Melgar, 486 S 177 (31 March 2006)
Corpus v. Ochoterena, 435 S 446
Macias v. Macias, 410 S 365
Sin v. Sin, 355 S 285
Ancheta v. Ancheta, 4 March 2004
Tuason v. CA and Tuason, 256 S 158 (10 April 1996)
Pacete v. Carriaga, 17 March 1994
Right to Support and Custody During Pendency of Action Art. 49 in rel. to Art. 213
Silva v. CA, 275 S 604 Necessity of Final Judgment / Requirements for Remarriage Art. 40 in rel. to Arts. 51-53
Jarillo v. People, 29 June 2010
Carino v. Carino, 2 February 2001
Leonor v. CA and Beldia, 2 April 1996
Balogbog v. Balogbog, 7 March 1997
Tamano v. Ortiz, 29 June 1998
Domingo v. CA, 226 S 106
Bobis v. Bobis, 336 S 747
Ty v. CA, 346 S 86 Effects of Declaration of Nullity Art. 43-44 in rel. to Arts. 50-53
Valdes v. Valdes, 31 July 1996 Status of Children born of Void Marriage
Art. 54 in rel. to Art. 165 E. VOIDABLE / Annullable MARRIAGES Meaning of Voidable / Annullable Marriage Grounds Art. 45-46 in rel. tots. 2 and 4 1. Lack of Parental Consent Art. 45, par. 1 in rel. to Art. 14 and R.A. 6809 2. Insanity Art. 45, par. 2 Distinguished from Psychological Incapacity 3. Fraud Art. 45, par. 3 in rel. to Art. 46 Concelment Defined
Villanueva v. CA, 27 October 2006
Anaya v. Palaroan, 36 S 97
Buccat v. Buccat, 72 P 19
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 12
4. Force, Intimidation, Undue Influence Art. 45, par. 4 in rel. to Arts. 1335, 1336, 1337 of Civil Code of the Philippines Art. 12, par. 5 and 6, Revised Penal Code
Villanueva v. CA, 27 October 2006
Macarrubo v. Macarrubo, 27 February 2004
Pp. v. Santiago, 51 P 68
Reyes v. Zaballero, 89 P 39 5. Impotency Art. 45, par. 5 in rel. to Art. 1 Impotencia Copulandi and Impotentia Generandi, Distinguished Relative Impotency Burden of Proof
Veronica Cabacungan Alcazar v. Rey C. Alcazar, 13 October 2009.
Villanueva v. CA, 27 October 2006 Doctrine of Triennial Cohabitation
Jimenez v. Canzinares, 109 P 173
Jimenez v. Republic, 10 P 274 6. Affliction of a Sexually Transmissible Disease Art. 45, par. 6 distinguished from Art. 46 (3) Ratification / Convalidation of Voidable Marriage Modes Art. 45 in rel. to Art. 47 Free Cohabitation, How Proven To What Marriages Applicable Prescription Period of Prescription Effects of Ratification / Convalidation Action for Annulment of Marriage Art. 47 and A.M. No. 02-11-10-SC, Who May Bring and Within What Period Art. 48, Appearance of the State
Pacete v. Carriaga, 17 March 1994
Tuazon, 256 S 158 (10 April 1996) Right to Support and Custody During Pendency of Action Art. 49 in rel. to Art. 213 Necessity of Final Judgment / Requirements for Remarriage Arts. 49 in rel. to Art. 213 Effects of Annulment Arts. 50-51 in rel. to Arts. 43-44 F. LEGAL SEPARATION Concept of Legal Separation A Vinculo Matrimoni and A Mensa Et Thoro, Distinguished History of Divorce and Legal Separation Arts. 45-55, P.D. 1083 or Code of Muslim Personal Laws Legal Separation and Separation of Property, Distinguished Art. 55 in rel. to Arts. 134-136 Legal Separation and Separation of Property, Distinguished Art. 55 in rel. to Arts. 134-136 Legal Separation and Separation De Facto, Distinguished Art. 55 in rel. to Arts. 100-101 Grounds
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 13
Art. 55 (1) to (10) in rel. to Arts. 101 and 128 Arts. 247, 333 and 334, Revised Penal Code
Ong v. Ong, 505 S 76
Banez v. Banez, 374 S 340
Gaudionco v. Penaranda, 27 November 1987
Prima Partosa-Jo v. CA, 216 S 692 Defenses Art. 56 1. Condonation / Pardon Art. 56, par. 1 Forms
Arroyo v. CA, 19 November 1991 Ginez v. Bugayong, 100 P 616 People v. Zapanta and Bondoc, 16 May 1951 Ocampo v. Florenciano, 23 February 1960
2. Consent Art. 56, par. 2 Distinguished from COndonation Forms
Matubis v. Praxedes, 109 P 789 Pp. v. Schneckenberger, 73 P 413 Pp. v. Sansano, 59 P 73
3. Connivance Art. 56, par. 3 Distinguished from Entrapment 4. Recrimation / Mutual Guilt Art. 56, par. 4 Same or Different Grounds Rationale
Benedicto v. Dela Rama, 3 P 34 5. Collusion Art. 56, par. 5 in rel. to Art. 60, par. 2 How Committed 6. Prescription Art. 56, par. 6 in rel. to Art. 57
Brown v. Yambao, 102 P 168
Ocampo v. Florenciano, 23 February 1960
Contreras v. Macaraig, 33 S 222 Action for Legal Separation Procedure, A.M. No. 02-11-11-SC Mandatory Cooling-Off Period Art. 58, Rationale
Araneta v. Conception, 99 P 709
Pacete v. Cariaga, 231 S 321
Somosa-Ramos v. Vamerita, 46 S 110 Exception: Provision on R.A. 9262
Art. 59, Duty of Court to Effect Reconciliation Art. 60, Necessity of Trial and Intervention of State Effects
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 14
1. Legal Separation Pendente Lite Arts. 61-62 in rel. to Art. 49
Sabalones v. CA, 14 February 1994 Espiritu and Layug v. CA, 15 March 1995 Lapuz Sy v. Eufemio, 43 S 177
2. Decree of Legal Separation Arts. 63 and 64 in rel. to Arts. 43, 213
Laperal v. Republic, 6 S 357 Siochi vs. Gozon, 18 March 2010
3. Reconciliation Arts. 65-67 Procedure On Pending Case On Final Decree of Legal Separation On Property Relations Registration Requirements G. RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF SPOUSES Gender Relations in Marriage / Gender Stereotypes Arts 68-81 in rel. to Arts. 100 and 127 Art. II, sec. 14 and Art. XIII, Sec. 14, 1987 Constitution Art. II (2) and Art. 247, Revised Penal Code Rule 130, Rules of Evidence on Marriage Privilege Rule and Communication Rule
Ilusorio v. Ilusorio, 12 May 2000
Arroyo v. Vasquez-Arroyo, 42 P 54
Goitia v. Campos Rueda, 35 P 252
Tenchavez v. Escao, 15 S 335, 17 S 674
Cuenca v. Cuenca, 8 December 1988
Go v. CA, 272 S 752 H. PROPERTY RELATIONS BETWEEN SPOUSES Art. 1 in rel to Art. 16, Civil Code of the Philippines 1. Marriage Settlement / Ante-Nuptial or Pre-Nuptial Agreement
Arts. 74-81 Definition and Purpose Form and Essential Elements Terms, Conditions and Stipulations Governing Law Effect if Marriage Does Not Take Place
2. Donations Propter Nuptias Arts. 82-87 in rel. to Art. 725 of the Civil Code of the Philippines Definition and Purpose Requisites Prohibition against Donation to Each Other Arts. 84 and 87 in rel. to Arts. 1490 and 1782, Civil Code of the Philippines
Arcaba v. Vda. De Batocael, 370 S 414
Matabuena v. Cervantes, 38 S 284
Grecio v. Sun Life, 48 P 53
Harding v. Commercial Union, 38 P 464 Revocation Art. 86 in rel. to Art. 50, 43 (3) and Arts. 134, 764, 769, 1144-1145, Civil Code
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 15
3. Absolute Community of Property Arts. 88-104 History When Mandatory Effect of Waiver of Rights Property Included Arts. 91, 95
Navarro v. Judge Escobido and Go, 27 November 2009 Property Excluded Arts. 92, 95
Villanueva v. CA, 427 S 439
Ching v. CA, 423 S 371
Tan v. CA, 273 S 229 Charges Against / Obligations of Absolute Community Arts. 94-95 in rel. to Arts. 194-195
Go v. CA, 272 S 752 Arts. 96-98 Compared with Art. 206, Civil Code of the Philippines Remedies in case of Disagreements Sole Administration, When Permissible
Siochi vs. Gozon, et al., 18 March 2010 Disposition: a) of Absolute Community Property Arts. 96, par. 2 and Art. 98 in rel. to Art. 739, Civil Code
Pelayo v. Perez, 459 SCRA 475
Ros and Aguete v. PNB Laoag, 6 April 2011
Aggabao v. Parulan, 1 September 2010
Fuentes, et al. v. Roca, et al., 21 April 2010
Sps. De Leon, et al. v. De Leon, et al., 23 July 2009
Sps. Bautista v. Silva, 502 S 334
Homeowners’ Savings and Loan v. Dallo, 453 S 283
Abalos v. Macatangay, 439 S 649
Roxas v. CA, 26 June 1991
Nicolas v. CA, 154 S 635 b) of Respective Interest in Absolute Community Property Dissolution and Liquidation of Absolute Community Grounds Art. 99 in rel. to Arts. 103, 63-64, 50-52, 134-138
Muller v. Muller, 500 S 65
Cruz v. Cristobal, 498 S 37
Go v. Yamane, 489 S 107
Oligario v. CA, 238 S 96
Nable-Jose v. Nable-Jose, 41 P 713
Luna v. Linatoc, 74 P 15 Effect of Separation De Facto
Cuenca v. Cuenca, 168 S 335
Wong v. CA, 19 August 1991
Prima Partosa-Jo v. CA, 216 S 692 Liquidation Procedure Arts. 102-104
De Ocampo v. Delizo, 69 S 216
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 16
Vda. De Consuegra v. GSIS, 37 S 315
4. Conjugal Partnership of Gains Arts. 105-133 History and Concept Distinguished from Absolute Community Regime When Apllicable Applicability of Ordinary Partnership Rules Exclusive Property of Each Spouse Art. 109, 113-115
Salvador v. CA, 243 S 239
Sarmiento v. Ordones, 17 August 1987
Villanueva v. IAC, 192 S 21
Tan v CA, 273 S 229 Ownership, Possession, Enjoyment and Administration of Exclusive Property Arts. 110-112
Manotok Realty v. CA, 30 April 1987
Ong v. CA, 29 November 1991 Property Included in Conjugal Partnership of Gains Arts. 116-120
Ravina v. Abrille, 16 October 2009
Titan Construction Corporation v. david, 15 March 2010.
Ching v. CA, 23 February 2004
Castro v. Miat, 397 S 271
Francisco v. CA, 25 November 1998
Diaz v. CA, 10 November 1986
Ayala Investments v. CA, 12 February 1998
Salvador v. CA, 243 S 239 Charges Against / Obligations of Conjugal Partnership Property Arts. 121-123 in rel. to Arts. 194-195
Domingo v. Reed, 477 S 227
Pana vs. Heirs of Jose Juanite Sr., et al, GR No. 164201, 10 December 2012
Enbrodo v. CA, 233 S 755
Carlos v. Abelardo, 9 April 2002
BA Finance v. CA, 28 May 1988
Johnson and Johnson v. CA, 23 September 1996 Ownership, Possession, Employment and Administration of Conjugal Partnership Property Remedies in case of Disagreements Arts. 124-125
Bautista v. Silva, 502 S 334
Alfredo v. Borras, 404 S 145
Jardeleza v. Jardeleza, 347 S 10
Guiang v. CA, 26 June 1998
Nicolas v. CA, 12 October 1987 Sole Administration, When Permissible Art. 124
Uy v. CA, 346 S 246
Sabalones v. CA, 230 S 79
Relucio v. Lopez, 16 January 2002
Dissolution and Liquidation of Conjugal Partnership Grounds Art. 126 in rel. to Arts. 103, 63-64, 50-52, 134-138
Nable- Jose v. Nable-Jose, 41 P 713
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 17
Effect of Separation De Facto Art. 127-128
Abalos v. Macatangay, 439 S 649
Heirs of Reyes v. Mijares, 410 S 97
Castro v. Miat, 397 S 271
Perez v. CA, 255 S 238 Liquidation Procedure Arts. 129-133
Quiao v. Quiao, GR No. 176556, 4 July 2012 5. Separation of Property Voluntary Separation of Properety Arts. 134, 143-146
Maquilan v. Maquilan, 8 June 2007
In re Bernas, 14 S 327
Lacson v. Lacson, 24 S 837 Judicial Separation of Property Art. 135-141 Grounds Procedure Revival 6. Property Regime of Unions without Marriage a) Void Marriages or Live-In Relationships Art. 147 Co-Ownership, Concept
Maxey v. CA, 129 S 187
Dino v. Dino, 19 January 2011
Abing v. CA, GR No. 146294, 31 July 2006
Buenaventura v. CA, 31 March 2005
MAquilan v. Maquilan, 8 June 2007
Gonzales v. Gonzales, 478 S 327
Flora v. Pardo, 420 S 396
Mercado v. Fehr, 414 S 288
Carino v. Carino, 2 February 2001
Valdes v. RTC, 31 July 1996
Mallilin Jr. v. Castillo, 333 S 628
Tumlos v. Fernandez, 330 718
Malang v. Moson, 338 S 393 b) Bigamous, Adulterous, Etc. Relationships Art. 148 Actual Joint Contribution, Concept
Francisco v. Reyes, 434 S 260
Joaquin v. Reyes, 434 S 260
Saguid v. CA, 10 June 2003
Carino v. Carino, 2 February 2001
Uy v. CA, 232 S 579
Balcodero v. CA, 227 S 303
Juaniza v. Jose, 89 S 306
Adriano v. CA, 27 March 2000 VII. THE FAMILY Art. 149 in rel. to Art. 1 and Art. XV and Art. XV and Art. II, Sec. 12, 1987 Constitution Family Relations, Coverage Art. 150
Guerrero v. RTC, 229 S 274
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 18
Scavias v. CA, 273 803 Suit Among Members of the Same Family / Necessity of Earnest Efforts toward Compromise Art. 151 in rel. to Art. 2035, Civil Code of the Philippines
Hiyas Savings v. Acuna, 500 S 514
Martinez v. Martinez, 461 S 562
Hontiveros v. RTC of Iloilo City, 309 S 340
Vda. De MAnalo v. CA, 16 January 2001 Prohibited Compromise Arts. 2034-2035 of the Civil Code of the Philippines
Santos v. CA, 475 S 1
Mendoza v. CA, 19 S 756
Versoza v. Versoza, 27 November 1968 Family Home Arts. 152-162 Definition How Constituted / Requisites
Trinidad-Ramos v. Pangilinan, 20 July 2010
Modequillo v. Breva, 31 May 1990 Beneficiaries of Family Home Benefits / Exemptions
Spouses Fortaleza v. Spouses Lapitan, GR No. 178288, 15 August 2012
Trinidad-Ramos v. Pangilinan, 20 July 2010
Josef v. Santos, 27 November 2008
Kelly v. Planters’ Products, 9 July 2008
Gomez v. Inez, 473 S 25
Manacop v. CA, 11 August 1997
Taneo v. CA, 304 S 308
VIII. PATERNITY AND FILIATION Paternity, Maternity, Filiation, Defined Kinds of Filiation Kinds / Status of Children
De Asis v. CA, 303 S 176
Fernandez v. Fernandez, 363 S 811 A. LEGITIMATE CHILDREN Art. 164 in rel. to Arts. 54 and 43 (1) Presumption of Legitimacy Children by Artificial Insemination, Requirements Action to Impugn Legitimacy Art. 166-169, Grounds
Conception v. CA, 468 S 438
Angeles v. Maglaya, 469 S 363
Abalos v. Macatangay, 439 S 649
Jao v. CA, 152 S 359
Andal v. Macaraig, 89 P 165
Babiera v. Catotal, 333 S 487
Benitez-Badua v. CA, 229 S 468 Who may File, Within What Period Arts. 170-171
Liyao v. Tanhoti-Liyao, 7 March 2002
Estate of Juan Dizon v. CA, 366 S 499 Action to Claim Legitimacy Proof of Legitimacy
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 19
Art. 172 Who May File, When to File Art. 173
Perla v. Baring, GR No. 172471, 12 November 2012
Tijing v CA, 8 March 2001
Go Kim Huy v. Go Kim Huy, 365 S 490 Rights of Legitimate Children Art. 174 in rel. to Arts. 194-196 Arts. 364, 369, 888 and 979, Civil Code of the Philippines
Tecson v. COMELEC, 3 March 2004
In Re: Julian Lin Wang, 30 March 2005
B. ILLEGITIMATE CHILDREN Art. 165 in rel. to Art. 54 Voluntary Recognition of Illegitimate Children, How Made
Cabatania v. Regodos, 441 S 96
Eceta v. Eceta, 428 S 782
Alberto v. CA, 232 S 745
De Jesus v. Estate of Dizon, 2 October 2001 as compared to
Aparicho v. Parugaya, 29 May 1987 Compulsory Recognition
Gotardo v. Buling, 15 August 2012
Rivero v. CA, 458 S 715
People v. Bayani, 8 October 1996 as compared to
People v. Manahan, 29 September 1999 Proof of Illegitimacy Art. 172
Nepomuceno v. Lopez, 08 March 2010
Rivera v. Heirs, 496 S 135
Cruz v. Cristobal, 498 S 37
CAbatania v. CA, 441 S 96
Lagabala v. Santiago, 4 December 2001
Ilano v. CA, 230 S 242
Fernandez v. CA, 260 S 130
Rodriguez v. CA, 245 S 150
Jison v. Jison, 24 February 1998
Pe Lim v. CA, 270 S 1 DNA Tests: Probative Value in Paternity Cases
Tijing v. CA, 8 March 2001
Agustin v. CA, 460 S 315 (DNA Testing)
Herrera v. Alba, 460 S 197
Pp v. Vallejo, 9 May 2002
Pp. v. Yatar, 428 S 504
Rules on DNA Evidence, Admin. Matter 06-11-05-SC, effective 15 Oct 2007, www.sc.judiciary.gov.ph
Who May File and Whn to File Action for Compulsory Recognition Art. 175, par. 2
Estate of Ong v. Diaz, 540 S 480
Guy v. CA, 502 S 151
Rivero v. CA, 458 S 714
Briones v. Miguel, 440 S 455
Herrera v. Alba, 460 S 197
Marquino v. IAC, 27 June 1994
Tayag v. CA, 209 S 665
People v. Bayani, 8 October 1996
Republic v. Abadilla, 29 January 1999
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 20
Rights of Illegitimate Children Art. 176 in rel. to R.A. 9255
Verceles v. Posadas, 27 April 2007
In the Re: Adoption of Stephanie Garcia, 454 S 541
Briones v. Miguel, 440 S 455
Pp. v. Glabo, 371 S 567
Tonog v. CA, 376 S 358
Mossesgeld v. CA, 300 S 464
Silvia v. CA, 275 S 604
David v. CA, 250 S 82 C. LEGITIMATED CHILDREN Arts. 178-182 in relation to RA 9858 Rationale Art. 178, How Made Art. 177, Requisites
De Santos v. Angeles, 12 December 1995
Abadilla v. Tabiliran, 249 S 448 *Parents who were minors (either or both) at the time of conception of child who subsequently marry Effects of Legitimation Rights of Legitimated Children Action to Impugn D. ADOPTED CHILDREN R.A. 8552 or the Domestic Adoption Act of 1998 Who May Adopt Who May be Adopted
Republic v. Hughes, 26 October 1997
Republic v. Toledano, 8 June 1994
Republic v. Hernandez, 9 February 1996
Republic v. CA, 15 March 1996
Republic v. Dye, 20 March 1997 Substantive and Procedural Requirements
In Re: Adoption of Stephanie Garcia, 454 S 541
Cang v. CA, 25 September 1998
DSWD v. Belen, 275 S 645
Teotico v. Del Val, 13 S 406 Rescission of Adoption; Grounds, who May File
Lahom v. Sibulo, 14 July 2003 R.A. 8043 or the Inter-Country Adoption Act of 1995 P.D. 603 or the Child and Youth Welfare Code IX. SUPPORT Arts. 194-208 Rule 61, 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure Concept and Extent Actual Need v. Capacity to Pay Arts. 201-202 Who Is Entitled to Support Arts. 195-197
Lacson v. Lacson, 499 S 677
Biones v. Miguel, 440 S 455
Quisumbing v. Icao, 34 S 132
Francisco v. Zandueta, 61 P 752
Ruiz v. CA, 29 January 1996
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 21
Art. 203, When Demandable Art. 205, Exemption from Levy and Attachment Who Must Pay Support Arts. 195-197, 199-200
Sps. Lim v. Lim, 30 October 2009
Verceles v. Posada, 27 April 2007
Mangonon v. CA, 494 S 1
De Guzman v. Perez, 496 S 474
Lam v. Chua, 426 S 29
Reyes v. Ines-Luciano, 28 February 1979
Santero v. CFI, 14 September 1987 How Given Art. 203, par. 3 and Art. 204 Arts. 206-207, Right of Third Persons Who Pay
Lacson v. Lacson, 499 S 677 Art. 208, Contractual Support or Support in A Will X. PARENTAL AUTHORITY AND CUSTODY Patria Potestas, Concept and Evolution Art. 209 Art. XV, Sec. 3 (1) and (2) of 1987 Constitution Child Defined, in rel. to R.A. 7610 and R.A. 9344 Art. 210, Characteristics of Parental Authority Art. 211, Who Exercises Parental Authority and Custody
De Guzman v. Perez, 496 S 474
Tonog v. CA, 7 February 2002
Vancil v. Belmes, 19 June 2001
Bondagjiy v. Bondagjiy, 7 December 2001
Sayala v. Islao, 266 S 317
Effect of Disagreement, Absence / Death, Separation or Termination of Marriage of Parents Arts. 212-213 in rel. to Arts. 49, 50, 62, 63 “Tender –Age Presumption” Rule
Gamboa-Hirsch v. CA, 11 July 2007
Gualberto v. Gualberto, 28 June 2005
Santos v. CA, 242 S 407
Galangco v. CA, 22 December 1997
Silva v. CA, 275 S 604
David v. CA, 250 S 82
Espiritu and LAyug v. CA and Masauding, 15 mArch 1995
Perez v. CA, 255 S 661
Sagala-Eslao v. CA and Cordero-Ouye, 16 January 1997
Oreta v. CA and Dandan, 22 December 1998 Art. 211, par. 2, Duties of Children Art. 215, Filial Privilege Rule Substitute Parental Authority When Applicable Arts. 214, 216, 222 Who May Exercise Arts. 216 and 217 Extent of Authority, Art. 233 Effects of Parental Authority Upon the Persons of the Children Arts. 220-221 in rel. to Art. 219
Libi v. IAC, 18 September 1992
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 22
Tamargo v. CA, 209 S 5180
Disciplinary Measures Arts. 22-224 Effects of Parental Authority Upon Property of Children – Ats. 225-227 Adventitious Ordinarious, Adventitious Extra-Ordinarious and Profectitious Property Termination / Suspension of Parental Authority Grounds for Termination Arts. 229, 232 in rel. to R.A 7610 Grounds for Suspension
Landingin v. RP, 493 S 415
Sombong v. CA, 31 January 1996 Special Parental Authority Arts. 218-219 When Applicable Who Exercises Special Parental Authority: Extent of Responsibility / Liability
Aquinas School v. Sps. Inton, 26 January 2011
St. Joseph’s College v. Miranda, 29 June 2010
St. Mary’s Academy v. Carpitanos, 6 February 2002
Amadora v. CA, 160 S 315
Salvosa v. IAC, 5 October 1988
PSBA v. CA, 4 February 1992 Extent of Special Parental Authority Art. 233, par. 2 XI. EMANCIPATION AND AGE OF MAJORITY Concept R.A. 6809 Effects Art. 236 XII. NAMES AND SURNAMES Arts. 364-380, Civil Code of the Philippines in rel. to Art. 178, Revised Penal Code Use of Surname by Women
Remo v. The Honorable Secretary of Foreign Affairs, 5 March 2010
Yasin v. Shai’a District Court, 23 February 1995 Use of Surname by Children
In the Re: Adoption of Stephanie Garcia, 454 S 541
In Re: Julian Lin Wang, 30 March 2005
Similarity / Idenity of Names and Surnames Usurpation of Name / Surname in relation to CA 142
Pp v. Joseph Estrada, 2 April 2009
Cesario Ursua v. CA, 10 April 1996 XIII. ABSENCE Meaning Ordinary Absence and Qualified Absence, Distinguished Stages of Absence Provisional Absence Arts. 381-383, Civil Code of the Philippines Remedies Who May Be Appointed Provisional Representative Declared Absence
Saint Louis University School of Law SY 2012-2013
LAW 111 – PERSONS AND FAMILY RELATIONS – COURSE OUTLINE
▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒ Prepared By: Atty. Lulu Reyes and Atty. Debbie G. Dulay – Del Val Page | 23
Arts. 384-386 Period
Bienvenido v. CA, 24 October 1994 Who May File Effectivity Date Appointment and Powers of Administrator Termination of Administration Contingent Rights of the Absentee Arts. 393-396 Presumptive Death Arts. 390-392 Purpose Periods XIV. CIVIL REGISTER Arts. 407-413 in rel. to R.A. 3753 and R.A 9048 or Clerical Error Law Purpose Entries Probative Value of Civil Register Amendments / Correction of Entries Arts. 376 and 412 in rel. to R.A. 9048
Republic v. Coseteng-Magpayo, 2 February 2011
Silverio v. Republic, 22 October 2007
RP v. Cagandahan, 12 September 2008
In the Re: Change of Name of Julian Wang, 30 March 2005
Lee v. CA, 11 October 2001
Recommended