View
220
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
1/30
Click to edit Master subtitle style
Circumstances Affectingthe Risk
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
2/30
Matters Affecting the Risk
o Risk in life Ins is the risk of death at anearly date due to disease asdistinguished from accident.
o Thomson v Weems, (1884)
Lord Blackburn observed: those whosebusiness is to insure lives calculate on the
average rate of mortality, and charge apremium which on that average willprevent their being losers.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
3/30
o In life insurance facts which tend toshorten the span of the life assuredwould amount to the circumstances
affecting the risk and those facts areregarded as material facts forpurposes of the duty of disclosure.
o
It is common practice for the insurersto put specific question in theproposal form about these facts.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
4/30
A life insurer makes enquiries
regarding the following facts, namely,
i) Age of the proponent
ii) His family history
iii) Personal healthiv) Moral history including habits of
life, past and present
v) Geographical position andoccupation
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
5/30
Age of the Proponent
o Age is an important material fact in lifeinsurance as the rate ofpremiumdepends on the age of the assured.
o
The age is generally proved when thepolicy is issued and if the age isadmitted an endorsement declaring ageadmitted is generally made on thepolicy.
o When once the endorsement in writing isthere on the policy no further proof isnecessary.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
6/30
Proof of age
i) Birth register extract from Municipal orother authentic public record
ii) School or college certificate
iii) Certificate of Baptismiv) Passport
v) Domicile certificate
vi) Marriage certificate
vii) Extract from service register in the case ofgovt servants or employees of otherauthorised institutions.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
7/30
o Once the age is admitted by the insurer,the correctness of the age cannot bequestioned unless the insurer can prove
that his admission was procured by thefraud of the assured.
o If age is not proved and admitted on the
policy when issued, it should be provedby the assured during the performanceof his contract.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
8/30
o It becomes more difficult andinconvenient to prove it for theclaimant after the death of assured.
o When once a date is given as date ofbirth, and on subsequent verificationafter the issue of the policy, the date isfound to be wrong it may result ineither overstatement of age orunderstatement of age.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
9/30
o If it is overstatement, it is considered to be aninnocent misrepresentation as it will be against theinterest of the maker and so in such cases thevalidity of the policy is not affected.
o In such cases if the insurer accepts the proof ofage, he can be compelled to refund the excesspayment towards the premium and to adjust therate for future payment according to the provedage.
o
But when it turns out to be an understatement ofage, if it is a gross understatement or is proved tohave been made willfully, it amounts to fraud andthe policy becomes voidable.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
10/30
If it does not amount to fraud the insurer may
follow either of the following two courses:
i) The sum assured may be reduced to such
amount as would have been secured if thecorrect age is known at the time when the
policy is issued; orii) The assured may be required if he wants
to continue the policy for the entire
insured amount to pay difference of
premium with interest for the earlierperiod and raise the rate of premium forfuture payment.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
11/30
Hemmins v Sceptore Life Association,(1905)
o The proposer effected with the insurers anendowment policy payable at the age of 60or at death and negligently misstated herage as 41 years though in fact she was atthat time 44 yrs of age, this fact wasbrought to notice of the insures in 1897and in spite of that the insurers acceptedthe premiums for 2 subsequent yrs.
o
Later they demanded from the assignee ahigher rate of premium and also thedifference of premiums accumulated todate at the revised rate.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
12/30
Cont
o The assignee declined to pay the higherrate and tendered the original ratepremium and the insurers refused to
receive the same.o It was held that the insurers had
forfeited their right to claim adjustment
of premium as they accepted the originalrates of premium without protest evenafter they came to know about the errorin age.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
13/30
Houseman also observes:
o if after becoming acquainted
with a breach of warranty the
life office continues to treatthe policy as valid it will be
held to have waived the
breach.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
14/30
In USA
o The Standard Provisions Law in USAprovides a simpler and better solutionfor this problem by insisting a clause
to be included in every policy to theeffect that if the age of the assuredhas been misstated, the amountpayable and every benefit accruingthereunder shall be said as thepremium paid would have purchasedat the correct age.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
15/30
Family History
o The risk in life policies depends onlongevity of the assured and hereditythrows sufficient light and plays an
important role in the determination orthe probable longevity of a person.o Therefore the medical officers usually
put a number of questions about thebirths and deaths of brothers, sisters,
parents and near relation, the diseasesfrom which they suffer then or sufferedin the past, the causes of their death,and ages at their deaths.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
16/30
o Family history gives a clue to theinsurers as to the constitution andprospects of longevity of theassured.
o Insanity of the near relatives is oneof the things to be revealed.
o The assured must give correctanswers regarding the familyhistory.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
17/30
Asia Assurance Company v Kartiya
Devi, (1936)
o The total number of brothers andsisters had to be filled in one columnand the actual number alive in
another column, the assured filledthe first column but left the otherblank.
o
It was held the answer amounted tosuppression of truth and henceamounted to misrepresentation andthe policy was void.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
18/30
Personal Health and Moral History
o The habits of life, past and present and
which tend to shorten the life must bedisclosed, eg. The use ofopium, tobacco or
alcohol.o Question are often asked as to the
temperate habits of the assured.o What is intemperance has nowhere been
defined but it has been held that it is notlimited to such intemperance as would
impair the general health of the assured.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
19/30
o The present state of health is materialbecause no prudent insurer wouldunderwrite the life of a person afflictedwith a fatal disease or who is one on adeath bed.
o The past illness also becomes materialbecause sometimes, some kinds ofdiseases leave a permanent effect on the
constitution of the person and shorten hislife, the nature and duration of treatmentbecomes useful to make an enquiry fromthe previous medical attendants.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
20/30
Geographical Position
o The place where the applicant lives isimportant as climate and environmenthave an appreciable effect on ones
health.o Unhealthy surrounding have a tendencyto shorten the life.
o Further, the particular place may besubject to earthquake, volcanoes andfloods.
o Therefore the applicant must give hisresidential address.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
21/30
Occupation
o Information regarding the occupation is
essential to understand the nature of therisk.
o
If it is a dangerous occupation like a soldier,sailor, airman or a workman in an
ammunition factory the insurers charge a
higher rate of premium.o If the description is with reference to non-
dangerous occupation, it will not affect the
validity of the policy,
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
22/30
Section 45 of Insurance Act, 1938
o It lays down that no policy can be challenged after twoyears from the date of the policy on the ground thatany statement made in the proposal or in any report ofthe medical officer or any document was inaccurate or
false, unless insurer shows that,(i) it is material to disclose,
(ii) it was fraudulently made and
(iii) the policy holder knows at the time that it was false orhe suppressed the fact material to be disclosed,
providedthat nothing in that section prevents theinsurer from calling for proof of age of the assured or toadjust the rate of premium according to the correct ageproved subsequently.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
23/30
LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA 112th REPORT ONSECTION45 OF THE INSURANCE ACT, 1938 (JUNE 1985)
o Under the Chairmanship of Justice K.K. Methew,referred to many judgments and observed that
o whenever claims are repudiated or disputes come tocourts of law, the LIC should not put up fight on the
pattern of ordinary litigants. But it must be on a higherplane so as to inspire confidence in the public thatclaims are not resisted on frivolous pleas and recklessallegations. All the relevant materials gathered by theLIC in the course of its investigation of a particularclaim shall be placed before the court to enable it tojudge the truth. There shall be a frank and fulldisclosure of all the material evidence and no attemptshould be made to suppress or withhold the same.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
24/30
Cont..
o Finally, after elaborate discussion onthis section and also compared withUK and USA, had givenrecommendation to change threeyears from two years in section 45.
o But this recommendation was not
been implemented.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
25/30
REPORT OF K.P.NARASINHAN COMMITTEE ON
PROVISIONS OF INSURANCE ACT, 1938, (JULY 2005)
observation on section 45:
o The Committee noted theelaborate consideration given in theLaw Commission Report and the
recommendations made withregard to amendments to theprovisions on the policy of lifeinsurance being called in question
on account of any misstatements inthe proposal for other papersleading to the issue of the policy
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
26/30
o .The Law Commission Report hasrefer to several Court rulings, includingthose of the Supreme Court, and the
Committee considered that there was aquite well settled case law on thesubject that insurers did appreciate,making any amendment of the present
Act provisions unnecessary for anequitable and adequate protection of theinterest of policyholders or of otherbeneficiary claimants.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
27/30
Cont..
o This report clearly shows that
there is no necessity of
amendment to the section 45 ofInsurance Act, 1938.
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
28/30
The new proposed amendment to section 45 ofInsurance Act, 1938 is not consumer friendlybecause of following reasons:
1. Insurers can repudiate the contract on any
ground whatsoever is increased to 5years (Presently it is two years).
2. That five years period counted from thedate of issuance of the policy or the date
of commencement of risk or the date of
revival of the policy or the date of the
rider to the policy, whichever is later(Presently the policy period counted fromthe date of issuance of the policy) .
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
29/30
Cont..
3. Burden of Proof is shifted toinsured to prove that insured
has not done fraudo (presently Burdon of Proof is
on Insurer).
8/2/2019 L -Circumstances Affecting Risk
30/30
Cont..
4. In case of repudiation of the policy within fiveyears on the ground of mis-statement orsuppression of a material fact, and not on theground of fraud, the premiums collected on
the policy till the date of repudiation shall bepaid to the insured or the legal representatives ornominees or assignees of the insured within a periodof ninety days from the date of such repudiationo [Presently insurer cant have a right to repudiate
the contract on the ground that insureds
statement or suppression of a material fact,which himself dont know at the time of enteringinto the contract (i.e. which was not fraud) ].
Recommended