Korea’s Success Model of Industrialization and Roles of Deans Council in Economic Development

Korea’s Success Model of Industrializationand Roles of Deans Council in Economic Development

20th October, 2010Singapore 20th October, 2010Singapore

Prof. Wonjong JooInnovation Center for Engineering Education

Seoul National Univ. of Science and Technology

2

Contents

I. Korea’s Compressed Development Model

II. Innovation Center for Engineering Education

III. Seoul Tech ICEE Operation

3

I.Korea’s Compressed Development Model

<One generation efforts can change the shape of a nation>

4

Korea in Asia

Geopolitically sensitive region

Only one divided country

Korea can be a hub country in Asia !

Within 3 hrs distance from Seoul,

1) 61 metropolitans having more than 1 million population2) 1/3 world population3) 20% of World GDP4) Purchasing power same as USA

5

1951, Korean warSeoul

6

Early 1960s: 2 bridges

Han River (Seoul)

7

At the end of Korean War

NO money

NO Technology

NO Natural resources

YES we have People

Isolation -> Colony -> World War II -> Korean War -> Division-> Instability (for 100 years)

8

Now

Seoul

9

Now: 26 bridges

Han River at Seoul

10

1963 $ 100

1970 $ 250

1996 $10,000

2009 < ~20,000

100 times(4.5 times growth, every 10 years)

Less than 2 times during last 13 years

GNI

11

Strong Leadership

12

Woolsan City

Construction Site of Hyundai Shipbuilding Co., year 1972

13

Shipbuilding Ship Engine Offshore Electrical Construction Platform Systems Vehicles

Woolsan City

Hyundai Heavy Industry Co.

14

- Shipbuilding #1 - Display #1 - Mobile Phone #2 - Automobile #5

-GDP #12 ($928.7b, ’08) Export # 8 ($383.5 b, ‘09)

- - R&D Budget # 7 ($33.6 Billion, ‘07)

-Int. License Reg. # 4 (‘07)

- 2008 Beijing Olympic # 7

- 2010 Winter Olympic # 5

- 2002 Worldcup #4

-Population # 26 (48 Million, ‘06)

-Higher Edu. Rate #1 (56%, OECD Ave. 34%, ‘07)

Industry Competitiveness

Science/ Technology

Economic Power Human Resource

Sports

Korean Drama

~ Rank 10

Korea’s Accomplishments

15

Reasons 1: Fast Economic Growth

0) International Help

1) Adversities in last 100 years2) Respect to scholar (Education)3) Free Market, Enterprise, and Trade4) Strong Leadership5) Qualified/ diligent Engineer

Only one country to be a donor from a receiver !!

16

Reason 2: Fast Economic Growth

Co-work: Check and Balance

17

Korea’s View: World Economy Trend

- Conversance Electric Car (Me + EE) Smart Phone (IT + conts)

- IT, BT, NT Fusion

- U-Health

- New Energy Source Business

- Climate change CO2 Market(‘06) 36B (‘07) 64B (‘10) $150B

- China’s Energy C

- New Emerging Countries / BRICs

- China: World Factory to Market

- City construction Fusion

Green

G20

18

17 Driving items

Recovery Energy

CO2 reduced Energy

Water Treatment

LED Applications

Green Transportation

Green City

Broadcast+Telecom

IT Fusion

Robot Applications

New Material (Nano)

Bio-Pham, Med. Eq’t

High Add. Food

Global Healthcare

Global Education

Green Finance

Contents/SW

MICE/ Tour

Green Fusion Service

Korea’s next Driving Forces

19

II. Innovation Center for Engineering Education

< Change everything except wife!>

20

GNIEconomic crisis 2

Economy 5 year Plan

Economic crisis1

NI Trend Analysis

Specialized Universities

Expansion of Universities

Quality ?Mismatch !

21

Korea Korea

33.2%33.2%

1990

83.8%83.8%

2008

USA USA Japan Japan

1990 2006 1990 2-06

59.9%59.9%61.9%61.9%

36.3%36.3%46%46%

Reflection: University Entrance Rate

22

14,90414,904

2001

35,56935,569

2009

71,24171,24171,24171,24179,54179,54179,54179,541

2001 2009 2001 2009

259,215259,215259,215259,215340,638340,638340,638340,638

239%239%

Korea Korea USA USA Japan Japan

Reflection: SCI Paper Publication

Research competence (?): SCI Papers: rank 12, Quotation: rank 14

* Total papers: 1,158,247papers, Korea 35,569 papers (2.4%)

The Times-QS Evaluation : Only 4 universities in top best 200s (’09)

23

World top of entrance rate: 33.2% (’90) → 68.0% (’00) → 83.8%(’08)

Completion rate of higher education for ages 25-34 : OECD Rank 1 or 2 (56%)

Satisfaction level of Univ. education : 3.1/5.0

IMD World competition Report : Lack of response to society needs

* Adaptedness of university education to the society (rank 51/57

countries)

* Supply level of qualified engineers (rank 50)

Reflection: Quantity VS Quality

Innovation = SpecializationInnovation = Specialization

2424

Start of Innovation for EE

- Industry complaints

- Government asked Deans Council of College of Engineering

- One year (2006) workshop of DCCE+ Government+ SERI

-SERI benchmarked world role model universities and made a guideline of ICEE

-10 universities was selected for preparing sample proposals that were distributed to all colleges of engineering

26

“Need-based Innovation for Engineering Education”

Industry’s contribution

Innovation of Policy

• Specialization based on a strategic plan of Univ.

• Industry Need-based Eng. Education Setting

• Reinforcement of Industry supporting functions

• Exact needs signal to Universities• Reinforcement of collaboration with

university• Participation on ABEEK

• Expanding invest on Education• Efficient Funding methods• Systematic Support for Industry

collaboration

Innovation of C. of Eng.

Government: Basic Direction for Innovation

27

- Lack of hard skills: Math, science, major, and practical knowledge for solving real problems

- Lack of soft skills: communication, teamwork, inter-personal skills

■ High unemployment rate / shortage of manpower (quantity mismatch)

■ Gap between industry’s expect and University’s education (quality mismatch)

■ The mismatch problem is rooted from a unified, supply-centered education

No guarantee of competitiveness with supply-centered educationKey Issues

Ⅰ. Why demander’s viewsⅠ. Why demander’s views

28

- Lack of adaptive ability of graduates to practical fields

- Increase of re-education cost for the new employees

· training cost per an employee: $100,000, ~30 months

(FKI , 2005)

■ Lack of strategic differences between universities

■ Research & education estranged from industry’s needs

2. Main University Issues in Demander’s views 2. Main University Issues in Demander’s views

2929

Innovation = Our Own

30

■ Lack of Government policies to enforcement each university’s specialties

■ Weak incentive system based on assessment

■ Lack of Government policies for industry collaboration

3. Main Policy Issues in Demander’s views 3. Main Policy Issues in Demander’s views

■ Lack of practical communication between industry and universities

Basic Direction of E-E InnovationBasic Direction of E-E Innovation

31

■ Strategic positioning of each university and engineering education to meet industry needs

■ Quality assurance for the suggested new model

- SERI suggest various models for a university and a department to

distinguish from others.- Suggest various Prototypes (contents, methods) for the innovation of

engineering education

■ Model suggestion for a university to select its strategies

Situation analysisSituation analysis

Needs analysisNeeds analysis

Strategic directionStrategic direction

SurveySurvey Benchmarking

Benchmarking

Finding IEE directionFinding IEE direction

Ideas extractionIdeas extraction

Indust./Univ. needs analysisIndust./Univ.

needs analysis BenchmarkingBenchmarking

Univ. Innov.

Univ. Innov. Policy Inno,Policy Inno, Indust. rolesIndust. roles I/U interactionI/U interaction

PlanningPlanning

EEI ActionEEI Action

Stage1. Visioning

Stage2. Innov. items

Stage3. Action Planning

Visioning, Idea search, action

Forum/ consultin

g

SERI

Process of InnovationProcess of Innovation

33

Innovation = Competition

34

1) As-Is analysis

2) SWOT Analysis

3) Regional industry’s situation analysis

4) To-Be configuration

5) Gap (between As-Is and To-Be) analysis

6) Find alternative solutions to be To-Be

University’s Innovation Process

output demand

R&D Engineer Technician

Firm Specific

• Tailored research to a specific company

• Co-research with a specific company

•Tailored engineers education to a specific company

•Test, certification, process improvement, education, etc for a specific company’s product development

•Tailored technicians education to a specific company

Industry Specific

•R&D manpower education for a specific region/ industry

•Contracted research with a company for a specific region/ industry

•Engineers education to a specific region/ industry

•Difficult field technique education a specific regional industry

•Technician education to a specific region/ industry

Industry Wide

•R&D manpower education for a wide range of industry

•Government driving research

•Engineers education for a wide range of industry

•Fundamental technique education

•Technician education for a wide range of industry

Role Models of E-E InnovationRole Models of E-E Innovation

output

demand

R&D Engineer Technician

Firm Specific

Industry Specific

Industry Wide

A-1 Department

A-2 Department

A-3 Department

B Configuration

University A Configuration

output

demand

R&D Engineer Technician

Firm Specific

Industry Specific

Industry Wide

A Configuration

B-1 Department

B-1 Department

University B Configuration

38

output

demand

R&D Engineer Technician

Firm Specific

Industry Specific

Industry Wide

AS-IS

TO-BE

As-Is vs To-Be

39

output

demand

R&D Engineer Technician

Firm Specific

Industry Specific

Industry Wide

MIT, 4,581 (2005) 4,498 (1998)

(14.7%) (6.1%)

(49.9%)(29.3%)

1998년

14.9% 11.1%

37.5%36.5%

2005년

MIT Configuration

40

Innovation Process

41

2 Eng. FusionHub Center

ICEE Hub Center 1

Hub Center Council

ICEE Hub Center 2

Seoul TechICEE Hub Center

(20 Univ)

ICEE Hub Center 4

ICEE Hub Center 5

ICEE Center

60 ICEEs5 Hub Center2 Fusion Hub C.5 years project

III. Seoul Tech ICEE Operation<Present technologies won’t exist after 10 years>

Seoul Tech. (SNUT -> SNUST)Seoul Tech. (SNUT -> SNUST)

• Undergraduate: 12,500/ Graduate; 1,300 / Faculty ~400

• University strategy: NT+IT+Design Fusion technology• Seoul Techno-Park ( Seoul TP)

• ICEE Hub university/ Capstone Design Hub University

Seoul TP

Seoul Techno PolisSeoul TP K. Electric Co.

Atomic Medical Center

Seoul Tech. Seoul Tech.

Business Incubator Center

45

SWOT Analysis

Strength -> Maximize strength

Weakness -> Overcome weakness

Opportunities -> Utilize opportunities

Threats -> Prepare threats

46

10%10%

7%7%

38%38% 15%15%

35%35% 78%78%

5%5%19%19%

21%21%

60%60%

27%27%

85%85%

By:Specialized Dep.Contract Dep.Fusion Grad. Sch.NITU (senior yr)

Seoul Tech. Configuration

47

Produce top 30% students to be 1st and 2nd levels

Flexible program basis

Utilize retired professors and industry people

Establish assessment system on professor /department / college

Demand (student, industry) oriented education

1 professor-1 teaching assistant

Establish specialized graduate school and ROU

Establish win-win industry collaboration

Clearly purposed dual system (day and evening)

Job placement rate 90% by demand oriented education

Establish a standard feed-back system

TO-BE

AS-IS

Student average level: 3rd/9 levels

Rigid department basis

High student-professor ratio

Lack of assessment system

Supply (univ.) oriented education

Big load of education and admin. Work on Professor

Lack of research manpower

Formal industry collaboration

Evening class Miss-match of curriculum

Job placement rate 80%

Weak feed-back student system

Gap analysis

48

Innovation Items 1

49

Innovation Items 2

50

Innovation Items 3

51

Innovation Items 4

52

건국대 , 국민대 , 동국대 , 서울산업대 , 숭실대 , 중앙대

한국산업기술대 , 한국항공대

건양대 , 단국대 ( 천안 ), 선문대 , 순천향대 , 한국기술교육대

한밭대

제주대

목포대 , 순천대

전주대

영동대 , 충주대

Seoul Tech ICEE Hub Center (20 universities)

53

Seoul Tech Hub Center: Work together :•From competition & isolation to cooperation & openness•Real time sharing•Minimize mistakes

54

3+1 system16 Univ’s. Join

Basic educational courses at their own universities

Freshman

Sophomore

Junior

Senior

NITU Program(MSP as well as Nano-devices)

Selection Process

ICEE Outcomes: NITU program

55

Umbrella-Type Nano+IT University Umbrella-Type Nano+IT University

Jointly develop courses & a credit transfer system

Collaboration with foreign universities

Hands-on experiments & facilities provided by Seoul TP and participating industries

Project Based Learning System, Team Teaching, NIT Capstone Design

16 Universities join Senior year (1 year ) program: “Microsystems packaging” Teaching staff: Industry people (60%) + professor (40%)

ICEE Outcomes: NITU program

ICEE Outcomes: Workshops +Seminars

57

ICEE Outcomes: Global Workshop

58

ICEE Outcomes: 2010 SMART Design Camp

59

ICEE Outcomes: Friendship

60

ICEE Outcomes: Global network

On 17th November, 2010“International Capstone Design Fair”

RHIT 와 MOU 체결

61

School Seoul Tech Rose-Hulman Inst. Tech.

Depart.Mechanical Design &

Auto.

Electrical and Computer

Eng.

Prof. D. Kim Daniel J. Moore

Studen

tsS. Suh, S. Park, Y. Na

Adam, Jon, Sam, Mark,

Jiangfeng

Produc

t4 족로봇 하드웨어 구현에 중점

Embedded system 구현에

중점

ICEE: Outcomes: Global network

International Joint Capstone Design

62

ICEE Outcomes: Global network

63

ICEE Outcomes: Kanazawa U (Japan) visit

Structure of Design I, II, and III courses

64

Vision to ActionVision to Action