View
219
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/20/2019 Judge Bass gag order requests in Ajibade case
1/13
vs.
CRIS-139S-JS
CRIS-1396-JS
JASON KENNY,
CRIS-1397-JS
MAXINE EVANS,
GREGORY BROWN,
Defendants.
ORDER
ON MOTION FOR GAG
ORDER
AND
MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO INTERVENE
Before the Court is a Motion for a Gag Order filed by the District Attorney
of
the Eastern
Judicial Circuit and a Motion to Intervene filed by WSAV . Having read and considered said
motions, Special Appearance Response in Opposition to State s Motion for Imposition
of
Gag
Order, all argument and evidence
of
record 2and the applicable law, including that presented at
the hearings on July 8, 20 IS the Court finds as follows:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Defendants in the above styled case were indicted on June 24, 20 IS
The
indictments
The Court considered the arguments in the Motion to Intervene filed by
WSA
V, as well
as the State s response to the motion.
The
Court has considered the newspaper articles submitted in exhibits
one
and two and
additionally considered the flash drive provided by WSA V as those documents were properly
authenticated. The Court did not consider the disks
of
the Claiborne interview which were
attached to Exhibit 2 nor did it consider the disk attached to the
WTOC
affidavit as those disks
were not properly authenticated.
8/20/2019 Judge Bass gag order requests in Ajibade case
2/13
arose out
of
the death
of Matthew
Ajibade, an inmate at the
Chatham County
Jail.
Also
pending
is CV15-0441 styled
l St
Lawrence
Sheriff
a/Chatham County Georgia
and
Meg Heap
District Attorney
vs WSA V Inc and
A den ike Hannah Ajibade
and
Solomon Oludamisi Ajibade
which concerns the disclosure
of
certain documents and records related to the investigation.
Formerly pending
was
CV15-0532 styled Adenike Hannah Ajidabe Solomon Oludamisi Ajidabe
and Christopher Oladapo
vs
Meg Heap
in
Her Capacity as Eastern Judicial Circuit District
Attorney which was filed by attorney Will Claiborne on June 9, 2015 in an
attempt
to have the
district attorney disqualified from investigating or presenting criminal charges related to the
death
of
Matthew Ajibade.
This
action was subsequently dismissed by
order
of
the Court on
July 2, 2015.
The State filed the instant Motion for Gag Order in which it seeks a gag order against the
parties and counsel for and all agents
of
all parties, including attorneys for the
victim s
family
and the Defendants.
They
argue that counsel for the victim s family have made extrajudicial
comments addressing potential trial issues to various media outlets and they attach a number
of
articles in support
of
their contentions.
Counsel for Defendant Maxine Evans argued that there is no evidence before the Court to
support any motion for gag order against any
of
the Defendants.
Counsel for Adenike Hannah Ajibade, Solomon Oludamisi Ajibade and Christopher
Oladapo filed a Special Appearance Response in Opposition to the State s Motion for Imposition
of
a Gag Order in which he argues that the
State s
Motion should be denied for the following
three reasons: (1) the Court may restrain only those parties and lawyers involved in the above
captioned proceedings; (2) the State failed to allege any facts to
support
its assertion that counsel
2
8/20/2019 Judge Bass gag order requests in Ajibade case
3/13
for the victim's family are subject to the Court's exercise of its equitable power in these
proceedings; and (3) counsel for the
victim's
family has a constitutionally protected right to
speak critically of the government's handling of a case.
WSAV filed a Motion to Intervene in the action for the limi ted purpose of opposing the
State's Motion for Imposition of a Gag Order.
At the hearing on the motion for gag order, the State submi tted a
number
of newspaper
articles. William
Claiborne
and
Mark
O'Mara, both attorneys for the family of Matthew
Ajibade, are quoted in the various articles.
Some
of
the statements
attributable to Claiborne, although not
exhaustive,
are as follows:
(1) [t]he fact that nine people were fired tells us how terrible this incident was. But the family
still has no answers about
what
happened to Matthew.
We
again call on the sheriff and DA to be
transparent while
we
seek
justice
for Matthew. ; (2) You have to be beyond incompetent to have
tried to get that charge and have failed." We need a fair and impartial prosecutor. (3)
The
family was very distressed to learn the cause and manner of death from their
son's
death
certificate.; (4) Right now because the family has been given no info as to what happened they
can't do anything but grieve. They can't have an opinion about
what
this means that these people
were let go. Except that what happened to their son was truly horrific." ; (5) He said that the
sheriff
s office has been too
slow
to release infonnation in the case.
I expect
that all
of
the
people who have committed any criminal act should be charged, that if anyone took steps to
enact a policy tha (sic) this to occur, that that individual be charged. ; (6) The family is very
distressed to learn that their son was murdered at the jail, with the release, the leak of the death
certificate." We have been asking since January for openness, we have been asking for
3
8/20/2019 Judge Bass gag order requests in Ajibade case
4/13
transparency. You saw here yet again the sheriff refusing to provide information." "They should
simply be humane and tell this family what happened
to
their son."; (7) "Every piece
of
information this family has received about their son has been on the news media, or today, Face
book." If he was in a holding cell with blunt force trauma for two hours, why wasn't h
checked in?" ; (8) For at least two hours, Matthew was in a holding cell after apparently having
sustained significant blunt force trauma, after apparently having been tased while in full
restraints."; (9) "You don't just punish the infantry men who fired the fatal shot, you punish the
general who made the call." If the sheriff had a cu( sic) of violence in his j ail, then he needs to
be the subject
of
an investigation and
it
appe(sic) me that due
to
personal relationship and
political relationships, the DA
is
choosing
to
engage in that type of investigation." ; (l0) [i]fthe
district attorney is not willing to then we have no choice but to go to court and bring those
conflicts
to
light."
We're
specifically concerned that the investigation needs
to
go from the top
down of the sheriff solely on the individuals who may have made bad decisions and engaged
in
criminal conduct.
...
"
Some
of
the statements attributable
to
Mark Q'Mara, although not exhaustive, are as
follows: (I) There's no blame yet. There are
just
a lot of questions."; (2)
Matthew
was going
places, and they were good places. And we need to know why he's never going to get there."; (3)
If this guy is in boxing stance, getting some good jabs in, maybe that's not mental illness. If
he's swinging around crazy and his mental illness affected what was going on, that's what they're
supposed
to
be trained to deal with." If you break a cop's nose, yes, it's a felony, you're going
to get charged, fine.
What's
not supposed
to
happen are injuries caused to a guy because he hit a
cop- and it ends up killing him. If that's what happened, that's first degree murder." "You don't
4
8/20/2019 Judge Bass gag order requests in Ajibade case
5/13
die from bipolar disorder in a restraining chair." "
If
he had bee white, would the cops have
listened
to
his girlfriend and taken him
to
the hospital? I
don't
know." What I do know
is
his
family deserves to know what in God's name happened to their son."; (4) A guy who was
bipolar dies in a restraining chair." You don't die from bipolar disorder. They need to get a
cohesive explanation out as soon as possible. Not only does the family deserve it, the public
does. There area lot of Black males being killed
in
circumstances that
don't
make much sense."
"The fiance was calling for help, then you lose him." We
don't
know the cause of Matthew's
death." "The Georgia Bureau ofInvestigation conducted an autopsy on January 6
lh
and we
expect to get an answer as soon as possible. But even
if
we discover the cause
of
Matthew's
death, the autopsy
won't
necessarily tell us why Matthew died. Why wasn't he taken to the
hospital? Did officers take into account Matthew's mental illness? How was he allowed to die
while in officer 's care? You are not supposed to die from bipolar disorder." "In the wake of
Michael Brown and Eric Garner, there is a crisis of confidence in our criminal justice system."
"There is an opportunity now for leaders in Savannah, Georgia
to
show the nation how to
properly deal with this type of tragedy. We and the rest of the nation is watching." ; (6) "The
Chatham County Sheriffs office has made
n
important first step
in
suspending two officers who
interacted with Matthew Ajibade the night of his death, but it is only a first step. A young man
is
dead, and he shouldn 't be. The family deserves to know why as soon as possible, and we expect
the Chatham County Sheriffs office will be forthcoming, transparent, and expedient in releasing
information about this case."; (7) "Let' s say that they had the autopsy results for three weeks,
four weeks, five weeks, which I think they have. Why are they not telling us? One reason why is
because they don't want us to know. That's not acceptable. We deserve to know. Even ifits
5
8/20/2019 Judge Bass gag order requests in Ajibade case
6/13
bad and it may be
bad, I think
we may
find out that Matthew did not just die
o
natural causes
coincidentally
to
be
in
the jail." "They're telling
us
they are working
on it.
They first said
it
would take a few weeks for an autopsy. That's long done
by
now and we don' t know what
it
said." "Police everywhere need to
be
trained
on
how
to
handle mentally ill individuals. They
have
to.
When you take someone who's
in the
throes
o
a mental event and then incarcerate
them, you're doing the exact opposite
o
what they need. They need help. They need immediate
care."; (8) The disciplinary action against
the two
deputies are "a good small step
in
holding
people responsible for their actions." "We still need questions answered how Matthew's life
was
taken from him." " Ajibade
was
diagnosed with bipolar disorder three years ago and
was
having a medical emergency
at
the time o
his
arrest
and
confinement.".; (9) "Metro Police had
an opportunity
to
use a certain amount
o
discretion and I don't know how they decided
to
use
it.
I know that that discretion could have been-
and it is in
many cases-
to
take a person
0 the
hospital. They may have very good reasons for using their discretion- we just don't know yet." ;
(l0) O'Mara said
he
suspects Ajibade
was
having a manic episode at the jail when deputies "beat
the (expletive) out o him to get control o him." The indictment is "too little to late." "The fact
that
the
grand jury found that there
was
aggravated assault coupled with the fact that there was a
death should have
led to
a felony murder charge unless Heap wasn't really trying
to
secure that
charge." "That's been our concern
all
along that she
was
going
to
whitewash this case
as
a
benefit
to the
sheriff and in derogation to Matthew's death." "It would be nice
to
say every one
o them should have been charged with murder, but that might be unrealistic. But here's my
frustration: We have been kept so in the dark about the facts in the case that we really don't
know." ; (11) "(The district attorney) failed
to
get a felony murder indictment, and that is her
6
8/20/2019 Judge Bass gag order requests in Ajibade case
7/13
responsibility."
They
are disappointed that nine out of 12 people involved in their son or cousin
or brother's death have gotten
away without
any criminal liability."
(12) Op
Ed piece written by
Mark O'Mara entitled Response to Sheriff Al St. Lawrence's Press Release ; (13) It
demands
further, absolute
transparency.
First of all, they knew (the cause
of
death) back in January,
I'm
sure. This (death certificate) was signed May 8, and a month later we find out about it. I
just
don't see how
they can
be so insensitive to the
man,
and insensitive to
the family's
grief.
They
have hid this from us for five months. It makes no sense.
Also
submitted
into
evidence
was an affidavit and a flash drive
from WSA
V -TV which
contained interviews
with
family
attorney
William
Claiborne
after
the
press conference
by
Sheriff Al St.
Lawrence.
In the interview given by Mr.
Claiborne,
he makes a
number
of
statements including that Matthew Ajibade was murdered, that
apparently
for at least
two
hours
he was in a holding cell after having apparently sustained blunt force
trauma,
and apparently had
been tased while in full restraint.
Called to testify at the
hearing
were the following four
witnesses: Kristen
Fulfort, J.J.
Haire,
Dana Campbell and
Ricky Becker. Kristen Fulfort, the public information
officer
for the
District Attorney's office, testified regarding email requests from various
media
outlets for a
comment from the district attorney regarding the instant
case
. J.J. Haire, who is employed with
the victim
witness office
of the District Attorney's office, testified that
she
had been instructed by
an
employee of Mark O'Mara's office, that all
communication
to the
victim's
family, should be
directed through his office. Dana Campbell, with Sidney A. Jones and Campbell Funeral
Services, and Ricky Becker, an investigator with
the Chatham County
District Attorney's office,
testified regarding the release of the death certificate of Matthew j ibade.
7
8/20/2019 Judge Bass gag order requests in Ajibade case
8/13
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
"Few, if any, interests under the Constitution are more fundamental than the right to a fair
trial by 'impartial' jurors, and an outcome affected by extrajudicial statements would violate that
fundamental right." [cit omitted]. To guarantee a defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a fair
trial, the Supreme Court has placed
"an
affirmative duty on trial
court's
to guard against
prejudicial pretrial publicity." [cit omitted]. Atlanta
Journal-Constitution
et.a!. V. State, 266
Ga. App. 168, 169, 596 S.E.2d694 (2004). "There can be no question that a criminal
defendant's right to a fair trial may not be compromised by commentary, from any lawyer or
party, offered up for media consumption on the courthouse steps." [cit omitted]. United States
v
Brown, 218
F
3d 415, 424, (2000).
The U.S. Supreme Court said in Sheppard v Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 350-351,86 S.Ct.
1507,
16
L.E.2d 600 (1966):
'(l)egal trials are not like elections, to be won through the use of the meeting-hall, the
radio and the newspaper' . [cit omitted]. 'freedom of discussion should be given the
widest range compatible with the essential requirement of the fair and orderly
administration of justice. , [cit omitted]. But it must not be allowed to divert the trial from
the 'very purpose of a court system to adjudicate controversies, both criminal and
civil, in the calmness and solemnity of the courtroom according to legal procedures.'
Mr. Justice Holmes stated in Patterson v Colorado, ex reI., Attorney General, 205 U.S.
454,462,27
S.D. 556, 558,
51
L.Ed 879 (1907): "[t]he theory of our system is that the
conclusions to be reached in a case will be induced by evidence and argument in open
court, and
not
by
any outside influences, whether private talk or public print."
Georgia Bar Rule 3.6 provides
[a] lawyer who is participating or has participated in the investigation or litigation
of
a
matter shall not make an extrajudicial statement that a person would reasonably believe to
8
8/20/2019 Judge Bass gag order requests in Ajibade case
9/13
be disseminated by means
of
public communication if the lawyer knows or reasonably
should know that it will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing an
adjudicative proceeding in the matter.
( c) Notwithstanding paragraph (a), a lawyer may make a statement that a reasonable
lawyer would believe is required to protect a client from the substantial undue prejudicial
effect of recent publicity not initiated by the lawyer or the
lawyer's
client. A statement
made pursuant to this paragraph shall be limited to such information as is necessary to
mitigate the recent adverse pUblicity.
American Bar Association Disciplinary Rule DR 7-107 (A) provides:
[a] lawyer participating in or associated with the investigation of a criminal matter shall
not make or participate in making an extrajudicial statement that a reasonable person
would expect to be disseminated by means of public communication and that does more
than state without elaboration:
(1)
Information contained in a public record.
(2) That the investigation is in progress
(3) The general scope of the investigation including a description of the offense and, if
permitted by law, the identity of the victim.
(4) A request for assistance in apprehending a suspect or assistance in other matters and
the information necessary thereto.
(5) A warning to the public
of
any dangers.
In the case
of
Atlanta Journal -Constitution et.a . V. State, 266 Ga. App.
168,596
S.E.2d694 (2004) the Court found that Rule 3.6 requires a finding that extrajudicial statements to
the media will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing a trial. Id. at 170.
Additionally, the trial court must make specific findings
of
fact based
on
evidence
of
record
regarding the possible impact of extrajudicial statements upon the forthcoming trial.
The District Attorney moves the Court for an order directed at
the
parties and counsel
for all agents of all parties, including the attorneys for the victims family and the Defendants to
refrain from making any statements regarding or releasing information concerning, the above-
referenced case that they know or reasonably should know will have a substantial likelihood of
materially prejudicing an adjudicat ive proceeding "
9
8/20/2019 Judge Bass gag order requests in Ajibade case
10/13
The Court finds that the State has failed to present any evidence regarding any
extrajudicial statements made by the Defendants or their attorneys and therefore, the request for a
gag order as to these parties is DENIED.
On the other hand, the State has presented a plethora of evidence, including but not
limited to newspaper articles and interviews, evidencing extra judicial statements made by
William Claiborne and Mark O Mara, both of whom have identified themselves as attorneys for
the Ajibade family.
With regard to attorney William Claiborne, he has made a number of
extrajudicial
statements, including but not limited to, statements regarding lack
of
information provided to the
family of Matthew Ajibade, statements regarding facts surrounding the death
of
Matthew
Ajibade, and the investigation by the District Attorney. He has given interviews to the television
stations and made comments which have been posted n various newspaper articles regarding the
instant action. Because of his filing
of
an action for mandamus against the District Attorney's
office requesting her removal with regard to her prosecution of the instant matter, the Court finds
that he has participated in the litigation of a matter. as contemplated by Georgia Rule of
Professional Conduct 3.6 (a) by inserting himself into the litigation.
Therefore, the only question which remains is whether the extrajudicial
comments
made
by Mr. Claiborne will have a substantial likelihood of materially prejudicing the trial. The
Court finds that they will. This Cour t has presided over a number of high profile cases, one
of
which required that ajury be selected from citizens outside Chatham County and is well versed
n pretrial publicity affecting the selection of a fair and impartial jury. The Court finds that the
statements made by William Claiborne, which began after the death of Matthew Ajibade on
10
8/20/2019 Judge Bass gag order requests in Ajibade case
11/13
January 1,2015, and has continued into June 2015, are an attempt by counsel to create sympathy
for the family
of
Matthew Ajibade. Mr. Claiborne indicated
in
his petition for mandamus that
the Ajibade family will be filing a civil suit against any and all patties responsible for the death
of
Matthew Ajibade and has indicated that there is a significant probability that Defendant Heap
will be named as a defendant in that action. The Court finds that the numerous statements made
by William Claiborne
over
the past six months will have a substantial likelihood
of
materially
prejudicing the trial because they will affect the ability to secure an unbiased jury panel and could
result
in
a change
of
venue.
The Court
is
not persuaded by the arguments
of
counsel that this Court does not have
jurisdiction to restrain him because he is not an attorney representing a party in the above
captioned proceedings. The Court has found that Mr. Claiborne has participated in the
litigation
of
this matter by insetting himself through the filing
of
a mandamus action to remove
the district attorney. He
is
clearly bound by Georgia Rule
of
Professional Conduct 3.6.
Additionally, while counsel for the victim's family has a constitutionally protected right to speak
critically of the State s handling of a case, this must be balanced with the trial court s affirmative
duty to ensure that the Defendants' receive a fair trial.
Therefore, based upon the foregoing, the
COUlt
GRANTS the
State s
request with regard
to a gag order as to attorney William Claiborne.
As to attorney Mark O Mara, who also has indicated that he is an attorney representing
the Ajibade family, the Court finds that a number of extra judicial statements have been made,
including an op ed piece that was written in response to the press release issued by Chatham
County Sheriff Al St. Lawrence. Mr.
O Mara
has not filed a motion to be admitted pro hac vice
11
8/20/2019 Judge Bass gag order requests in Ajibade case
12/13
pursuant to Unifonn Superior Court Rule 4.4.
3
The COUlt finds that since Mr. O'Mara has not
filed a motion
to
be admitted pro hac vice, he is not subject
to
Georgia Rule o Professional
Conduct 3.6.
He is
subject to American Bar Association Disciplinary rule DR 7 1 07(A),
however, that rule only provides for a lawyer participating in or associated with the
investigation
o
a criminal matter. The
COUlt
finds that
no
evidence has been presented
to
indicate that Mr. O'Mara has participated in the investigation o the criminal matter, only that he
has participated in the litigation, for example, by advising the victim witness advocate that his
office
is
the contact for the Ajibade family. Although
it is
concerning
to
the
COUlt
that
Mr.
O'Mara
has
made numerous extrajudicial statements regarding this matter and
has
participated
in
the litigation o this matter, the
COUlt
finds that it has
no
jurisdiction over him
in
which
to
issue
a gag order.
The Court further finds that nothing in this order is directed at the media, and therefore,
it cannot
be
classified
as
a prior restraint. See Atlanta Journal-Constitution et.al. supra at
168.
WHEREFORE, pursuant
to
Georgia Bar Rule 3.6, T
IS
HEREBY ORDERED,
ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the State's Motion for Gag Order is GRANTED as to
William Claiborne, a Georgia licensed lawyer, who is governed
by
the Georgia bar rules. Mr.
Claiborne
is
prohibited from making any statement that he should know will have a substantial
likelihood of materially prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding
in
this matter. He
is
entitled
to
comment on those subjects
as
outlined
in
Comment 5(B) under Rule 3.6 o the Georgia Rules o
Professional Conduct. This order shall be in effect until such time as there is a resolution
is
the
JThe Court notes however that Mr. Q'Mara appeared at a hearing on June 29, 2015 before
the Honorable Michael L. Karpf in CV 15-0532 and was allowed
to
sit at counsel table with
William Claiborne
to
assist.
12
8/20/2019 Judge Bass gag order requests in Ajibade case
13/13
above styled cases
SO ORDERED this
cc: ll parties
fl day
o t L r -
13
Recommended