JANUARY 2020 – REIMBURSEMENT · billing agent software system deficiencies. ... q Marked increase...

Preview:

Citation preview

JANUARY 2020 – REIMBURSEMENT Monitoring Your Billing Company Performance: Metrics You Need to Measure DESCRIPTION How do you know if your billing company is doing a good job for you? The speaker will review relevant industry benchmarks related to revenue cycle management and how to use them to evaluate your vendor’s performance. OBJECTIVES

• Identify key industry benchmarks for revenue cycle management performance • Understand the terminology used in the billing company industry • Apply these standards to evaluate your receivables over annual cycles and identify

problem areas 1/28/2020, 10:45 AM - 11:45 AM, Monitoring Your Billing Company Performance: Metrics You Need to Measure FACULTY Jeffery Bettinger, MD, FACEP DISCLOSURE (+) No significant financial relationships to disclose

MONITORING YOUR BILLING

COMPANY PERFORMANCE:

METRICS YOU NEED TO

MEASURE

PRESENTED BY: JEFFREY BETTINGER, MD, FACEP

2

Goal:To understand revenue

reduction causes and to use metrics for early recognition

of billing problems.

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT TO ME? q Revenue collected plays a critical role in

shaping services provided and the satisfaction of those providing the service:§ Salaries§ Staffing levels§ Financial security, including retirement§ Interaction, or independence, from hospital

administration§ Recruiting§ Etc.

4

RESPONSIBILITY FOR MONITORING BILLING PERFORMANCE

q Unrealistic to have all physicians maintain adequate knowledge

q Usually the responsibility of one physician, not necessarily the group leader

q Time spent should be compensatedq Non-physician expertise depending on

group size

5

TOP 5 REASONS FOR LOST REVENUE IN 2011 – STILL LARGELY TRUE IN 2020q Missing and incomplete chartsq Deficient documentationq Conservative or inaccurate codingq Credentialing problemsq Managed Care – various problems

§ Downcoding, partial payment, incorrect payment, billing agent software system deficiencies

EMERGING REVENUE THREAT – HIGH DEDUCTIBLE HEALTH INSURANCEq Self-pay collection processes mainly

designed for patients without insurance

q Historically very low collections

q Marked increase in self-pay amounts due to high deductible plans

q Benefits and costs of enhancing collection processes for deductible amounts

7

THE “BUCK” STOPS (OR STARTS) HERE . . .

8

What do these billing

reports mean?

IMPORTANT BILLING REPORTSq Aging reportsq Reports that tie collections back to the

month of chargesq Cash receipts and charges reportsq Encounter tracking reportsq Time-to-collect reportsq Coding acuity reports

9

AGING REPORTS:AKA: AGED TRIAL BALANCE REPORT

10

0-30Days

30-60 Days

60-90 Days

90-120 Days

>120 Days

MedicaidSelf PayBlue CrossX-HMOY-InsuranceMedicare

AGING REPORTq Dollars in each column represent unpaid

invoices at various agesq Some reports re-age invoice to zero days

when financial class in changed (avoid)q Some reports keep invoice amount in

original financial class if financial class is changed

11

AGING REPORTS:AKA: AGED TRIAL BALANCE REPORT

12

0-30Days

30-60 Days

60-90 Days

90-120 Days

>120 Days

MedicaidSelf PayBlue CrossX-HMOY-InsuranceMedicare

PREFERENCES

q Invoice remains in original age column, even if financial class changes

q Invoice changes to new financial class upon change of financial class

q Include aging for individual payer (insurance company product) level

13

AGING BENCHMARKS (1)

q AR > 120 days less than 20% of total ARq Individual financial class AR > 120 days at

variable ratio to current, depending on:§ Dunning philosophy§ Conversion to self-pay process§ Outstanding provider numbers§ Payer payment policies§ Billing company AR management

14

AGING REPORTS:AKA: AGED TRIAL BALANCE REPORT

15

0-30Days

30-60 Days

60-90 Days

90-120 Days

>120 Days

MedicaidSelf PayBlue CrossX-HMOY-InsuranceMedicare

AGING BENCHMARKS (2*)

q Watch for trend of steadily decreasing ARq Look for “bubbles”

16

17

REPORTS THAT LINK COLLECTIONS BACK TO THE MONTH OF CHARGES:AKA: COLLECTION RATIO, COLLECTION ANALYSIS

18

Month Visits Charges CollectionsAverage

Collection Per Visit

%Collection Disallowances Bad

Debt% AR

Balance

January

February

March

AprilMay

June

COLLECTION RATIO/NOTESq Columns for charges, receipts, disallowances,

bad debt, and AR balanceq Amounts in each row represent the receipts,

disallowances, etc. for invoices that are included in charges for the individual historic month

q Critical information: Historic collections per visit

19

COLLECTION RATIO PREFERENCES

q 24-month historyq Include collection agency receipt column

(rare)

20

COLLECTION RATIO BENCHMARKS

q 12 months: < 1% outstanding ARq 18 months: < 0.5% outstanding AR

21

DEMAND THE TRUTH, THE WHOLE TRUTH, AND NOTHING BUT THE TRUTH!

CASH RECEIPTS AND CHARGES REPORT AKA: TRANSACTION SUMMARY, COLLECTION AND CHARGES TRENDING REPORT

q Really two reports:§ One-month review of payments and disallowances

by financial class§ Multi-month tracking of summary charges and

collections

23

CHARGES/RECEIPTS REPORT PREFERENCESq Strict calendar month accounting – no

“27” day monthsq Single report contains receipts and

disallowances for all major financial classes and large payers

q Trending reports go back 2-3 yearsq Trending reports contain encounter

number information

24

PAYMENTS/DISALLOWANCE BENCHMARKS – NO SET VALUEq Ratio of payments to disallowances by

payer depends on:§ Fee schedule - provider and payer§ Payer policies§ Acceptance of payer determined disallowances

and down-coding

25

PAYMENT/DISALLOWANCE RATIO BY FINANCIAL CLASS

Closely tracking these ratios may

give first indication of change in payer

policies or inaccurate payment

posting.

ENCOUNTER TRACKING REPORTS

q Emergency Departmentq Billing agent

27

ENCOUNTER TRACKING REPORTS -NOTESq Electronic ED log is the primary source

documentq Ensure that log contains all patients that

present to the ED (including admits)q Double check notations such as LWBS,

AMA, PMD, etc. on ED log

28

ENCOUNTER TRACKING REPORTS -PREFERENCESq Daily interaction between personnel to

reconcile missing and incomplete recordsq Hold transmissions for 2 to 5 days before

sending them to billing agent

29

ENCOUNTER TRACKING REPORTS -BENCHMARKSq Eventual loss (after 1 year) of 0% of

encountersq Six-month benchmark of < 0.5% missing

encountersq Revenue loss 2° to non-billed record: 3 -

5%/month delayed, value near 0 after 12 months

30

31

WHICH DESCRIBES YOUR

ENCOUNTER TRACKING SYSTEM?

TIME-TO-COLLECT REPORT

Most common calculation is days in Accounts

Receivable (Days in AR).

32

CALCULATING DAYS IN AR

Days in AR = Gross ARAvg. daily chargefor last 90 days

Note: Some analysts prefer net days in AR, but net AR is a difficult calculation for emergency

medicine.

33

DAYS IN AR BENCHMARK FOR EMERGENCY MEDICINE

q 30 - 50 days dependent upon:§ Dunning philosophy§ Efficiency of billing op§ Credentialing§ Problem payers§ Accuracy of initial insurance info§ State-specific indigent care programs

34

35

Days in AR? Thirty-five is great, right?

DON’T BE FOOLED BY THE NUMBERS . . . q Writes self-pay off after 30 daysq Accepts all reduced payments from

insurersq Routine write-offs for missing provider

numbersq Accepts all bundling and downcoding

decisions of insurers

36

CODING ACUITY REPORTS

q Common coding reports:§ Overall monthly code choice, total, and by provider§ Evaluation and Management codes, total, and by

provider§ RVU reports§ Code reports by payer

37

CODE CHOICE BENCHMARKSq Only available database is from Medicareq Correlation with admits and transfersq Compliance concernsq External auditsq Intra-group comparisons - watch the pitfallsq Active documentation feedback program

from billing agent

38

Understanding billing reports is not quantum mechanics. Using

benchmarks and methodical evaluation of routine billing

reports, problems can be easily identified, and collections can be

enhanced.

39

40

TOP 5 REASONS FOR LOST REVENUE IN 2011 STILL HOLD IN 2020

q Missing and incomplete chartsq Deficient documentationq Conservative or inaccurate codingq Credentialing problemsq Managed Care – various problems

§ Downcoding, partial payment, incorrect payment, billing agent software system deficiencies

MISSING AND INCOMPLETE CHARTSq Electronic ED log is the primary source

documentq Daily interaction between billing and

hospital personnel to reconcile missing and incomplete records

q Eventual loss (after 1 year) of 0% of encounters

DEFICIENT DOCUMENTATIONq Monthly code choice report, total, and by

provider

q Only available database is from Medicare

q Intra-group comparisons - watch the pitfalls

q Active documentation feedback program from billing agent

CREDENTIALING PROBLEMS

q Watch for trend of steadily decreasing AR in the aging reports

q Look for “bubbles” in the aging reportsq AR > 120 days less than 20% of total AR

(late indicator)

MANAGED CARE PAYMENT PROBLEMSq Watch for trend of steadily decreasing AR

for each payerq Receipts and disallowances for large

payers – look for trendsq Ratio of payments to disallowances by

payer – look for trends

HIGH DEDUCTIBLE HEALTH INSURANCEq Need to measure collection rates for this

subset of patient responsible amounts

q May require redesign of billing reports

q Collection rate for self-pay at registration usually less than 5%

q Collection rate for self-pay after deductible often only 25% to 35%

47

Knowledge is power

(and increased collections).

THANK YOU

48

Recommended