View
0
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
J. A. Sobrino, G. Sòria, M. Atitar, A. B. Ruescas, J. C. Jiménez-Muñoz, V. Hidalgo, Y. Julien, B. Franch
Global Change Unit, IPL ‐ University of Valencia, Spain
sobrino@uv.es
963543115
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop
22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
PRESENTATION SCHEMEPRESENTATION SCHEME
1.1.-- CEFLES2 field campaignCEFLES2 field campaign
Instrumental DescriptionInstrumental Description
Field dataField data
2.2.-- LSTLST
AATSR AATSR
SEVIRISEVIRI
MODISMODIS
3.3.-- COMPARISONCOMPARISON
4.4.-- CONCLUSIONSCONCLUSIONS
The CEFLES2 (CarboEurope, FLEX and Sentinel-2) experimental field campaign wasconceived as a collective multi-objective campaign exploiting synergies between three experiments collocated in the Les Landes region of France during the period April to September 2007, thus encompassing a large fraction of the vegetation cycle of the different land covers and crops.
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
1. CEFLES2 campaign1. CEFLES2 campaign
The objective within theCEFLES2 campaign was tocollect biophysical paramethersdata related with thephotosinthesis, energy fluxes, etc, in different agriculturaland forest areas.
Measurement activities were constrained within a rectangle from Bordeaux to Toulouse in Southwest France. The majority of sites lie in the Les Landes forested area and the adjacent intermediate zone, in the transition between forested and cultivated areas.
The Global Change Unit measurements were carried out mainly in the agricultural areanear Marmande and the forest area of Le Bray
• Marmande site:
The site comprises large fields of winter wheat, corn and rapeseed at three separate locations on flat land in the Garonne valley bottom.
Continuos measurements werecarried out using radiometersinstalled on masts, simultaneoslywith the sensors overpasses.
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
1. CEFLES2 campaign1. CEFLES2 campaign
MaizeMaize (P222)(P222)
WheatWheat (P250)(P250)
GrassGrass (P823)(P823)2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
1. CEFLES2 campaign1. CEFLES2 campaign
• Le Bray Forest site:
In the forest site of Le Bray, thermal measurements were carried out using 3 different broad band radiometers located on top of a tower and pointing at nadir and 55º, every 5 minutes.
• Thermal radiometers:
• Calibration sources:EVEREST 1000EVEREST 1000
EVEREST 4000EVEREST 4000RaytekRaytek STST RaytekRaytek MIDMID OPTRIS OPTRIS MiniSightMiniSight PlusPlus
CIMEL CIMEL CE 312CE 312--1& 21& 2
• Thermal camera:NEC TH9100 proNEC TH9100 pro
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
1. Instrumental1. Instrumental
Le Bray forest were Pine trees andground in between are visible. Continuous radiometric temperaturemeasurements in two viewing angles(nadir and 50º), with Raytek MID and Everest 4000 radiometers.
Data gap betweendays 133 to 144
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
1. Field data1. Field data
• Some examples of measured values in Le Bray Forest:
2. LST ALGORITHMS2. LST ALGORITHMSRADIATIVE TRANSFER EQUATION
, , , , ,( ) (1 )sen atm atmi i i s i i i iL B T L Lθ θ θ θ θε ε τ↓ ↑⎡ ⎤= + − +⎣ ⎦
TTii TTgg AT-SENSOR RADIANCE=
SURFACE EMISSION ATENUATTED BY THE
ATMOSPHERE+
GROUND REFLECTED RADIANCE ATENUATTED BY THE
ATMOSPHERE+
ATMOSPHERIC EMISSION
RTE applied to 1 band ⇒ SINGLE-CHANNEL METHODSRTE applied to 2 bands ⇒ TWO-CHANNEL (SW) METHODSRTE applied to 2 observation angles ⇒ DUAL-ANGLE METHODS
Advanced Along-Track Scanning Radiometer
• two view angles: nadir (0º) and forward (55º)
• pixel size: 1 km2 nadir, 1.5 km x 2 km forward
• swath of about 500 km (555 pixels nadir, 371 forward)
• 7 spectral bands: visible, near infrared thermal infrareden
2. 2. LST ALGORITHMSLST ALGORITHMS. AATSR. AATSR
ESA Level2 product of LST is processed from:
“Land Surface Temperature Measurement from Space; AATSR Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document” by A. Prata.
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
SplitSplit--windowwindow methodmethod::
DualDual--angleangle methodmethod::
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
2. 2. LST ALGORITHMSLST ALGORITHMS. AATSR. AATSR
The SW method uses observations at two differentwavelengths with the same observation angle
The DA method uses observations at two different observation angles within the same wavelength interval
A set of algorithms were proposed to retrieve LST from AATSR data using Split-window andDual-angle methods. A deep analysis of this algorithms and its validation over homogeneousand heterogeneous sites can be found in the paper:
Soria G. and Sobrino, J.A., (2007) ENVISAT/AATSR derived Land Surface Temperature over a heterogeneous region. Remote Sensing of Environment 111
A split window algorithm has been cosen in order to make the comparison withthe Level2 product
SplitSplit--windowwindow methodmethod::
The SW method uses observations at two different wavelengths with the
same observation angle.
210 )1()( BBBTTATT jiis εε Δ−−+−−+=2
ji εεε
+=
ji εεε −=Δ
DualDual--angleangle methodmethod::
210 )1()( BBBTTATT nfnns θεε Δ−−+−−+= fn εεεθ −=Δ
The DA method uses observations at two different observation angles
within the same wavelength interval
iθτ iθτ iθτ 2. LST 2. LST AlgorithmsAlgorithms. AATSR. AATSR
A set of algorithms were proposed to retrieve LST from AATSR data usingSplit-window and Dual-angle methods. A deep analysis of this algorithms andits validation over homogeneous and heterogeneous sites can be found in Soria and Sobrino, Remote Sensing of Environment 111, 2007.
The algorithms coefficients were obtained from simulated data to applythem to a large amount of surfaces.
iθτ iθτ iθτ
From MODTRAN simulation code:
transmissivitytransmissivity θτ i
↑atmiR θ
↓atmiR θupwellingupwelling and downwelling and downwelling
atmospheric atmospheric radianceradiance
waterwater vapor vapor contentcontent W
From laboratory spectral library, a set of emissivity values of:
VegetationVegetation: : GrassGrass, , ConifersConifers, , DecidiousDecidious
BareBare soilssoils, , rocksrocks
WaterWater11µm and 12 µm channels,nadir and forward views.
-- CoefficientsCoefficients calculationcalculation
2. LST 2. LST AlgorithmsAlgorithms. AATSR. AATSR
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
Algorithm Expression
SW n, Quad: Ts = T2n + 0.61(T2n-T1n) + 0.31(T2n-T1n)2 + 1.92
SW n, Quad, ε: Ts = T2n + 0.76(T2n-T1n) + 0.30(T2n-T1n)2 + 0.10 + 51.2(1-ε)
SW n, Quad, ε, Δε: Ts = T2n + 1.03(T2n-T1n) + 0.26(T2n-T1n)2 – 0.11 + 45.23(1-ε) – 79.95Δε
SW n (W), ε, Δε, W: Ts = T2n + (1.01+ 0.53W)(T2n-T1n) + (0.4-0.85W) + (63.4-7.01W)(1-ε) - (111-17.6W)Δε
SW n, Quad, ε, Δε, W: Ts = T2n + 1.35(T2n-T1n) + 0.22(T2n-T1n)2 – (0.82-0.15W) + (62.6-7.2W)(1-ε) - (144-26.3W) Δε
SW n, Quad(W), ε, Δε, W: Ts = T2n + (1.97+0.2W)(T2n-T1n) - (0.26-0.08W)(T2n-T1n)2 + (0.02-0.67W) + (64.5-7.35W)(1-ε) - (119-20.4W) Δε
DA 11 Quad: Ts = T2n + 1.36(T2n-T2f) + 0.18(T2n-T2f)2 + 1.78
DA 11 Quad, ε: Ts = T2n + 1.56(T2n-T2f) + 0.15(T2n-T2f)2 - 0.34 + 51.9(1-ε2n)
DA 11 Quad, ε, Δε: Ts = T2n + 1.57(T2n-T2f) + 0.15(T2n-T2f)2 –0.11 + 51.7(1-ε2n) – 25.8Δεθ
DA 11 W, ε, Δε, W: Ts = T2n + (1.62+0.3W)(T2n-T2f) + (0.18-0.52W) + (70.1-7.18W)(1-ε2n) - (35.4-3.67W)Δεθ
DA 11 Quad, ε, Δε, W: Ts = T2n + 1.92(T2n-T2f) + 0.12(T2n-T2f)2 – (0.39+0.09W) + (71-7.55W)(1-ε2n) - (35.8-3.88W)Δεθ
DA 11 Quad(W), ε, Δε, W: Ts = T2n + (2.67-0.07W)(T2n-T2f) - (0.29-0.09W)(T2n-T2f)2 - (0.31+0.28W) + (72.5-7.9W)(1-ε2n) - (35.8-4.1W)Δεθ
Algorithms with different number of inputs: Brightness Temperature, emissivity and water vapor.
A split window algorithm was chosen in order to make the comparison with the Level2 product
2. LST 2. LST AlgorithmsAlgorithms. AATSR. AATSR
Algorithm σmod (K)
σnoise (K)
σε (K)
σWV (K)
σtotal (K)
SW n, Quad: 1.73 0.07 1.73
SW n, Quad, ε: 1.39 0.07 0.18 1.40
SW n, Quad, ε, Δε: 1.05 0.09 0.59 1.20
SW n (W), ε, Δε, W: 0.59 0.10 0.83 0.45 1.12
SW n, Quad, ε, Δε, W: 0.93 0.11 1.06 0.20 1.43
SW n, Quad(W), ε, Δε, W: 0.52 0.15 0.89 0.37 1.10
DA 11 Quad: 1.31 0.11 1.32
DA 11 Quad, ε: 0.72 0.12 0.18 0.75
DA 11 Quad, ε, Δε: 0.69 0.13 0.26 0.74
DA 11 W, ε, Δε, W: 0.47 0.13 0.35 0.36 0.70
DA 11 Quad, ε, Δε, W: 0.57 0.15 0.36 0.17 0.71
DA 11 Quad(W), ε, Δε, W: 0.38 0.20 0.37 0.24 0.62
σmod: residual atmospheric error.
σnoise: noise error: NEΔT=0.05 K.
σε: emissivity error: ε(ε)= 0.005.
σWV: water vapor column error:
ε(WV)= 0.5 gcm-2.
{ }2222mod WVnoisetotal σσσσσ ε +++=
* * SensitivitySensitivity analysisanalysis fromfrom error error theorytheory ofof thethe algorithmsalgorithms
2. LST 2. LST AlgorithmsAlgorithms. AATSR. AATSR
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager
• Geostationary sensor onboard the MSG-2 platform
• 11 Visible, NIR and TIR spectral bands of 3km pixel
• 1 High resolution pancromatic band of 1km pixel
• 1 global image every 15 min
2. LST Algorithms. SEVIRI2. LST Algorithms. SEVIRI
LST product isdistributed from the
Land SatelliteApplication Facilities
from EUMETSAT
A Split Window algorithm was developed by the GCU to retrieve LST from SEVIRI data.
M. Atitar, J.A. Sobrino, G. Soria, J.P. Wigneron, M. Romaguera, J.C. Jiménez-Muñoz, Y. Julien, A.B. Ruescas. Land surface temperature retrieved from SEVIRI / MSG2 data: algorithm and validation. Eumetsat Meteorological Satellite Conference 2008
Sobrino, J.A. and Romaguera, M. (2004). Land surface temperature retrieval from MSG1-SEVIRI data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 92
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
This algorithm has been used in thecomparison with theLand SAF product
2. LST 2. LST AlgorithmsAlgorithms. SEVIRI. SEVIRI
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer
• Polar sensor onboard the TERRA / AQUA platforms
• 36 Visible, NIR and TIR spectral bands
• 2 bands of 250m pixel, 5 of 500m pixel and 29 bands
of 1km pixel
MODIS products has been obtained from the
EOS DATA Gateway.
LST product can be retrieved from the
MOD11 product
2. LST 2. LST AlgorithmsAlgorithms. MODIS. MODIS
a SW algorithm was developed to retrieve LST from MODIS data. This algorithm has been used in the comparison with the MODIS EOS Data Gateway product.
More information can be found in:
Sobrino, J.A., El-Kharraz, J. and Li, Z.L. (2003). Surface temperature and water vapour retrieval from MODIS data. International Journal of Remote Sensing. 24
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
2. LST 2. LST AlgorithmsAlgorithms. MODIS. MODIS
LAND SURFACE EMISSIVITY FROM SATELLITE DATALAND SURFACE EMISSIVITY FROM SATELLITE DATA
2. LST 2. LST AlgorithmsAlgorithms
20
AATSR-SEVIRI: Split window covariance-variance ratio (SWCVR)
W = 0.26 - 14.253 cosθ lnR54 - 11.649 (cosθ lnR54)2
R54
5 5
=
− −
−
=1
=1
∑
∑
( )( )
( )
T T T T
T T
4k 4o k ok
4k 4o2
k
Ν
Ν
θ : Ángulo de observación satélite.
error: 0.5 (g cm-2)
ESTIMATION OF WATER VAPOUR CONTENT FROM SATELLITE DATAESTIMATION OF WATER VAPOUR CONTENT FROM SATELLITE DATA
21
Ratio (C=L17/L2)band 17, absorbent (0.902-0.908) μmband 2, transparent 0.8610.861--0.869 0.869 μm
W= 26,3+-54,4 C+ 28,5 C2
MODIS/TERRA-
Antennas
NOAA-AHVRRTERRA/AQUA-MODIS MSG-SEVIRI
IPL-VALENCIA UNIVERSITY (Spain)
3. Comparison Results. Satellite data3. Comparison Results. Satellite data
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
• Simultaneous images were acquired of AATSR, SEVIRI and MODIS sensors over thestudy site of the CEFLES2 campaign.
•2 AATSR images analized correspond to a day scene of the 26th of July 2007 (10:38 UTC) and a night scene of the 27 of July 2007 (21:25 UTC). The more simultaneousSEVIRI and MODIS images has been acquired and procesed to obtain LST from thealgorithms proposed and also to get the LST products, respectively.
AATSR scene over Le Bray site AATSR RGB image 26th July 2007
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
3. Comparison Results. Satellite data3. Comparison Results. Satellite data
AATSR LST image retrieved 26 july 2007 (10:38 UTC) with SW6 algorithm proposed
AATSR LST Level 2 product26 july 2007 (10:38 UTC)
286 290 294 298 302 306 310 314 318 286 290 294 298 302 306 310 314 318
Study area of Le Bray has not been processed in Level2 product, only Brightness temperature in 11μm band is available.
Another area, more homogeneous, has been used for intercomparison
Study Area: 44º 43’ 7” N, 0º 45’ 23” W
Study Area #2: 44º 20’ 26” N, 0º 41’ 16” W
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
3. Comparison Results. Satellite data3. Comparison Results. Satellite data
AATSR LST image retrieved 27 july 2007 (21:25 UTC) with SW6 algorithm proposed
AATSR LST Level 2 product27 july 2007 (21:25 UTC)
286 290 294 298 302 306 310 314 318 286 290 294 298 302 306 310 314 318
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
3. Comparison Results. Satellite data3. Comparison Results. Satellite data
MODIS LST image retrieved 26 july 2007 (10:38 UTC) with SW algorithm from GCU
MODIS LST product 26 july 2007 (10:38 UTC) from EOS Data Gateway
286 290 294 298 302 306 310 314 318 286 290 294 298 302 306 310 314 318
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
3. Comparison Results. Satellite data3. Comparison Results. Satellite data
285 290 295 300 310 320 325 330 335
SEVIRI LST image retrieved withSW algorithm from GCU
SEVIRI LST products from LandSAF
26 july 2007 (10:38 UTC)
27 july 2007 (21:25 UTC)
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
Field mesurements of LST at nadir and 55ºon Le Bray Tower for 26th and 27th July 2007
3. Comparison Results. Field data3. Comparison Results. Field data
In Situ LST measured at nadir and 55 º
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
26/07/2007 0:00 26/07/2007 12:00 27/07/2007 0:00 27/07/2007 12:00 28/07/2007 0:00
Date
Tem
pera
ture
(ºC
)
nadir
55º
Mean LST measured atsatellite overpass time (±15 min)
289.7 K290.2 K27 / 07 / 2007
21:25 UTC
303.9 K296.8 K26 / 07 / 2007
10:38 UTC
In Situ LST 55º
In Situ LST nadir
Day /Time
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
3. Comparison Results. 3. Comparison Results.
286 290 294 298 302 306 310 314 318
309.2302.9303.3
308.5300.1300.6
300.1299.2300.0
300.0298.9300.7
300.0300.9302.2
300.1300.1301.9
301.6302.0301.4
301.2301.3301.5
300.4300.5300.6
299.5299.6299.9
299.7299.9300.1
300.1300.2300.4
Area of 3x3 pixel size (1km pixel)
Mean value of the 3x3 pixel area
Area of 1 pixel size (3km pixel)
AATSR MODIS SEVIRI
302.7 300.5 301.2 299.9 302.5 301.7
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
3. Comparison Results. 3. Comparison Results.
-
-
289.5
289.6
289.4
290.8
289.8
LST (K) 27th (2nd area)
289.7-303.5In Situ
288.8298.3299.6EOS
product
289.2299.9301.2SW GCUMODIS
287.9300.7302.7LandSAFproduct
288.4301.7302.5SW GCUSEVIRI
Notprocessed302.9Not
processedLevel2
product
289.7300.5302.7SW GCUAATSR
LST (K) 27th (1st area)
LST (K) 26th (2nd area)
LST (K) 26th (1st area)
ProductSensor
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
3. Comparison Results. 3. Comparison Results.
-0.0
--0.8
AATSR SW – IN SITU
NotProcessed**0.92.33.0AATSR SW – MODIS EOS data
0.30.50.61.5AATSR SW – MODIS SW
0.21.8-0.20.0AATSR SW – SEVIRI LandSAF
0.41.3-1.20.2AATSR SW – SEVIRI SW
-1.0Not Processed
(2.5)*-2.4
Not Processed(4.9)*
AATSR SW – AATSR Level2
289.8289.7300.5302.7LST AATSR SW (K)
27 2nd area
271st area
26th 2nd area
26th1st area
*Difference with channel 11 brightness temperature
** MODIS (22:05h)
DAY NIGHT
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
4. Summary and Conclusions4. Summary and Conclusions
A set of Split window algorithms has been developed to retrieve LST from AATSR data
Satellite images from AATSR, SEVIRI and MODIS has been acquired during the CEFLES2 campaign, carried out in the Les Landes region of France. Split window algorithms developed for SEVIRI and MODIS by the Global Change Unit has been applied to the images acquired to retrieve LST
A comparison has been carried out between the SW algorithms proposed and the LST products for AATSR, SEVIRI and MODIS data distributed by ESA, LandSaf and EOS data Gateway, respectively.
The comparison shows:
-LST from AATSR SW algorithm proposed is generally higher-AATSR SW algorithm proposed has a good agreement with in situ data
-AATSR SW algorithm proposed has a good agreement with the SEVIRI SW and LandSAF and MODIS SW images.
-Less agreement has been observed for AATSR ESA product and MODIS EOS.
2nd MERIS/(A)AATSR User Workshop · 22 to 26 September 2008 · ESA/ESRIN Frascati
PROBLEMSSome problems remain in data quality
– Cloud flagging – well known problem for many sensors
– Continuity at biome boundaries– Resolution (0.5x0.5) not adequate for
heterogeneous surfaces (i, land cover, and f fractional vegetation cover) .
What about the dynamic of Land cover?Why not the same that the AATSR spatial
resolution (1 km x 1km) ?
– Limitations of scale of auxiliary data– LST product only nadir view.
TOWARDS SOME IMPROVEMENTS...but less
operational?• To optimise (i and f) the AATSR LST PRODUCT
for each test site (Methodologies for heterogeneous areas)• To estimate W from AATSR data (SWCVR? Others?)• To evaluate emissivity from AATSR data (from NDVI, from dynamic land cover maps?)• THE AATSR NOVELTY IS THE BIANGULAR. WHY
NOT TO EXPLOIT THIS AND To develop dual angle algorithms (better LST retrievals) for homogeneous areas.
(field measurements of emissivity angular variation)
Is time to know the interest of this?
( ) ( ) ( )[ ] ↑↓ +−+= iisisensori LLTBTB τεε 1
Atmospheric effectsBT measured by the sensor
Surface emissivity
LST Product Algorithm (1)
• The atmosphere and surface emissivity are temporally and spatially heterogeneous over land
• The LST product uses global ancillary data (some of which are seasonally dependent) to derive the atmospheric correction
• Brightness Temperatures from multiple channels are used to improve the atmospheric correction (split-window)
( ) ( ) 12,,1211,,, TcbTTbaLST ififn
ifpwif ++−+=• Regression-based split-window algorithm (nadir-only):
• Where:• T11 and T12 are nadir 11 and 12 μm channel brightness
temperatures (BT)• a, b, c – retrieval coefficients from Prata (2002) that
depend on:– Surface/vegetation type (i)– Vegetation fraction (f) – seasonally dependent– Precipitable water (pw) – seasonally dependent– Satellite zenith view angle (n(θ))– (Time of day)
• Coefficients are on 0.5° grids
LST Product Algorithm (2)
Surface/Vegetation Type
• 13 biomes and 1 lake class
• 0.5° resolution grid
• Based on the Dorman & Sellers (1989) classification
Fractional Vegetation
• Values between 0 and 1
• 0.5° resolution grid (monthly intervals)
• Based on monthly vegetation fraction from Dorman and Sellers (1989) and ISLSCP NDVI global composite
Precipitable Water
• Corrects for increased atmospheric absorption with viewing angle (i.e. for true nadir this has no effect)
• 0.5° resolution grid (monthly intervals)
• Based on NASA Water Vapour Climatology (NVAP)
Recommended