View
224
Download
3
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Introduction to the Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ)
Revised version of the presentation given at the Summer 2012 Minnesota PBIS Institute
School-wide Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ)
Lists 53 benchmarks of PBIS programs that address 10 critical elements of PBIS implementation
Completed by school teams on an annual basis
Assess how schools score on a 107 point scale with regard to developing and implementing school-wide PBIS
School-wide Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ)
Useful in developing action plans for following school year
Encourage team discussion of strengths and weaknesses and provides ideas for action planning
One of the measures used by MDE to identify model schools
Criteria for qualifying to complete the BoQ
wilderresearch.org
LocalDemonstration with Fidelity
Score of 80 for overall Implementation on most recent SET (within 3 years)
Out of training (next school year – cohorts 1-6)
Why learn about the BoQ now?
wilderresearch.org
Timeline for 2012-2013 school year
January 2013: Notification sent to schools qualifying for the BoQ
February 2013: BoQ training, sent by Wilder Research
February-May 2013: Complete BoQ and submit scores on pbisassessment.org
wilderresearch.org
Three components of the BoQ
Team Member Rating Form─ Completed by team members independently─ Returned to coach
Scoring Form─ Completed by coach using Scoring Guide─ Used for reporting back to team
Scoring Guide─ Describes procedure for completing BoQ─ Includes a rubric for scoring each item
STEP 0
Complete BoQ training
─ This year, two short training videos
─ Training format may be different next year
wilderresearch.org
STEP 1
PBIS Coach uses Scoring Guide to complete the School-Wide Benchmarks of Quality: Scoring Form
Critical elements STEP 1
STEP 2++, +,
or -
STEP 3
PBS Team
1. Team has administrative support
3 2 1 0
2. Team has regular meetings (at least monthly)
2 1 0
3. Team has established a clear mission/purpose
1 0
Benchmarks example:Scoring Form
Benchmark 3 points 2 points 1 point 0 points
1. Team has administrative support
Administrator(s) attended training, play an active role in the PBIS process, actively communicate their commitment, support the decisions of the PBIS team, and attend all team meetings.
Administrator(s) support the process, take as active role as the rest of the team, and/or attend most meetings
Administrator(s) support the process but don’t take as active role as the rest of the team, and/or attends only a few meetings
Administrator(s) do not actively support the PBIS process.
Benchmarks example:Scoring Guide
STEP 2
PBIS Coach asks every PBIS Team Member to complete the School-Wide Benchmarks of Quality Team Member Rating Form independently
─ Do not give a Scoring Guide to team members
Giving a deadline is helpful (e.g. submit at next month’s meeting, within 1-2 weeks, etc.)
STEP 2
Coach collects Team Member Rating Forms
Coach tallies all responses provided by team members using the Team Member Rating Form: Tally Sheet
STEP 2: Scoring team member forms
For items with a range of 0 to 1:─ 1 = In Place─ 0 = Needs Improvement or Not in Place
For items with a range of 0 to 2:─ 2 = In Place─ 1 = Needs Improvement─ 0 = Not in Place
For items with a range of 0 to 3:─ 3 = In Place─ 2 or 1 = Needs Improvement─ 0 = Not in Place
Tally sheet
l l
I I l
I
I I l
Benchmarks example:Scoring Form
Critical elements STEP 1
STEP 2++, +,
or -
STEP 3
PBS Team
1. Team has administrative support
3 2 1 0++
2. Team has regular meetings (at least monthly)
2 1 0++
3. Team has established a clear mission/purpose
1 0-
STEP 3
PBIS Coach places a “√” next to any item where there is a discrepancy between the coach’s rating and the item’s most frequently responded by the team.
Benchmarks practice:Scoring Form, Scoring Guide
Critical elements STEP 1
STEP 2++, +,
or -
STEP 3
PBS Team
1. Team has administrative support
3 2 1 0++ √
2. Team has regular meetings (at least monthly)
2 1 0++
3. Team has established a clear mission/purpose
1 0-
STEP 3
The coach will then complete the Team Summary on page 3 of the Benchmarks of Quality Scoring Form recording areas of discrepancy, strength, and weakness.
Item #
Team Response
Coach’sScore Scoring Guide Description
Areas of Strength
Critical Element
Description of areas of strength
Areas in Need of Development
1 ++, ++, ++
0 Administrator does not actively support the process
Areas of Discrepancy
Critical Element
Description of areas in need of development
Adjusting scores in areas of discrepancy
If upon sharing areas of discrepancy, the item and the adjusted final score should be recorded on the Scoring Form
It is recommended that changes be noted with a different color ink
Adjusting scores after discussion
Critical elements STEP 1
STEP 2++, +,
or -
STEP 3
PBS Team
1. Team has administrative support
3 2 1 0++ √
2. Team has regular meetings (at least monthly)
2 1 0++
3. Team has established a clear mission/purpose
1 0-
STEP 4
Coach will report back to the team using the Team Report page of the Benchmarks of Quality: Scoring Form
Coach leads team through a discussion of the identified areas of strength and weakness
This information should be conveyed as “constructive feedback” to assist with action planning
STEP 5
Coach adds up all the points on the Benchmarks of Quality: Scoring Form
Coach submits scores on pbisassessment.org
70% score or higher equals implementing PBIS with fidelity (75 points or higher)
Entering scores into pbisassessment.org
Visit https://www.pbisassessment.org/login
Enter your School ID
─ Please contact Wilder Research at pbisevalmn@wilder.org if you do not know your School ID for logging in to pbisassessment.org
wilderresearch.org
Entering scores into pbisassessment.org
Viewing scores on pbisassessment.org
Contact
Wilder Research
pbisevalmn@wilder.org
651-280-2960
wilderresearch.org
Recommended