Introdução à Medicina II Class 16 Advisers : Mário Dinis-Ribeiro Ricardo Santos

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Birth weight references throughout Western Europe: Characterization of its usage by neonatologists. Introdução à Medicina II Class 16 Advisers : Mário Dinis-Ribeiro Ricardo Santos Francisco Mourão. SUMMARY. Introduction Aim Methods Results Discussion / Conclusion. INTRODUCTION. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Birth weight references throughout Western Europe:

Characterization of its usage by neonatologists

Introdução à Medicina IIClass 16Advisers:

• Mário Dinis-Ribeiro• Ricardo Santos• Francisco Mourão

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

SUMMARY

I. Introduction

II. Aim

III. Methods

IV. Results

V. Discussion/Conclusion

2 fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

INTRODUCTION

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

1987 Present

Over the past years, there has been several studies about birth weight curves.

They contributed to define normal and abnormal reference values [1], that are useful for clinical, public health and investigational purposes. [2]

1- McIntire DD, Bloom SL, et al. Birth weight in Relation to Morbidity and Mortality among Newborn Infants. N Engl J Med 19992- Brenner WE, Edelman DA, Hendricks CH. A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America. AM J Obstet Gynecol 19763- Fok, T F, So, H K, et al. Updated gestational age specific birth weight, crown-hell length, and head circumference of Chinese newborns. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 2003

3

[3]

INTRODUCTION

4 - Gardosi J, Mongelli M, Wilcox M, Chang A. An adjustable fetal weight standard Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 19955 - Merialdi M, Caulfield LE, Zavaleta N, et al. Fetal growth in Peru: comparisons with international fetal size charts and implications for fetal growth assessment Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005

4 fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

INTRODUCTION

6 - Kramer Michael, et al. A new and Improved Population-Based Canadian Reference for Birth Weight for Gestational Age Pediatics 20017 - Zhang J, Bowes WA Jr. Birth-weight-for-gestational-age patterns by race, sex, and parity in the United States population. Obstet Gynecology 1995

5 fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

INTRODUCTION

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

8 - Zhang Jun, et al. Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynacology 20109 - Teresa To, Jun Guan, Chengning Wang, et al. Is large birth weight associated with asthma risk in early childhood? ADC 201010 - Tanis R Fenton, A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format, 1Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary 2003

[10]

Dissimilarities in birth weight curves

Wrong Diagnoses

Diseases related with growth restriction [8] or with large birth weight.

[9]

6

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com7

11 - Alexander, G., et al., A United States national reference for fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol, 1996. 87: p. 163 - 168.

INTRODUCTION

[11]

Alexander, G. (1996)Alexander, G. (1996)

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com8

“The postnatal growth data of 4 of the infant

cohorts from the National Institute of

Child Health and Human Development Neonatal

Research Network superimposed on the

new chart.”

12 - Fenton, T., A new growth chart for preterm babies: Babson and Benda's chart updated with recent data and a new format. BMC Pediatrics, 2003. 3(1): p. 13.

INTRODUCTION

[12]

Fenton, T. (2003)Fenton, T. (2003)

9 13 - Olsen, I.E., New Intrauterine Growth Curves Based on United States Data. Pediatrics, 2010. 125(2): p. e214-e224.

INTRODUCTIONOlsen, I.E (2010)Olsen, I.E (2010)

SUMMARY

I. Introduction

II. Aim

III. Methods

IV. Results

V. Discussion/Conclusion

10 fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

AIM

11 fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

SUMMARY

I. Introduction

II. Aim

III. Methods

IV. Results

V. Discussion/Conclusion

12 fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

METHODSSelected population:

Neonatologists working on Western European Hospitals with >1500 births-per-year

13 fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

14

METHODS

Western European countries

selected by

UNESCO definition

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

METHODS

15

1. Analyze the number of births per hospital

If this information was not included on their online data bases

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

METHODS

16

2. Select the Western European Hospitals that meet our requirements.

Less than 1500

births per year

Over than 1500

births per year

EliminatedSelected randomly 20 hospitals per country (when the country has more than 20 hospitals) fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

17

METHODS

METHODS

18

3. Contact the neonatology department of each selected Hospital, sending a online survey.

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

METHODS

19

4. If the neonatology department of each hospital did not answer…

After one week

After another week without answer

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

METHODS - Survey

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com20

METHODS

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com21

METHODS

22

5. Analyze the results and discuss.

Analysis of the data collected via

statistical methods

PASW Statistics

18

GraphingMicrosoft

Office Excel 2007

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

SUMMARY

I. Introduction

II. Aim

III. Methods

IV. Results

V. Discussion/Conclusion

23 fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

CountryNumber of randomized

hospitals selected

Number of answers of each country

Percentage of answers (%)

Belgium 11 1 9

Finland 14 1 7

France 20 1 5

England 20 4 20

North Ireland 5 1 20

Wales 9 4 44

Portugal 20 10 50

Czech Republic 17 4 24

Switzerland 5 2 40

Austria 14 1 7

Scotland 13 1 8

Spain 20 1 5

Ireland 19 2 11

Luxemburg 2 0 0

Norway 14 1 7

Sweden 20 1 5

Denmark 18 2 11

Total 241 37 15

RESULTS

25 fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

RESULTS

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Clinical Administratives Students Both Clinical andAdmnistrarive

Who answered?

26

n = 3 n = 2

n = 28

n = 1

n =2 not responded

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

RESULTS

27

Mean 2949,85

Std Deviation 1118,481

Minimum 1500

Maximum 5500

Births per Hospital:

n=36

n=4

n=8

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

RESULTS

28

n=30

n=2

n=4

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

RESULTS

29 fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

RESULTS

30

Which birth weight standards/reference tables do you use?

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

RESULTS

31

Which birth weight standards/reference tables do you use?

““OTHER”OTHER”

- “UK – World Health Organization growth chart”

- “CDC growth chart, 2000, USA”

- “Niklasson A. and Karlberg P 1999, Sveeden”

- “BMUS approved Chitty charts based on the Hadlock formula”

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

RESULTS

32

The main reason behind its use:

It has been used

for many years

It is the hospital/

department policy

It was produced

for our population

We have done some

research and it is considered themost suitable

Other reason No opinion

n=10n=10

n=8

n=3n=3 n=1

SUMMARY

I. Introduction

II. Aim

III. Methods

IV. Results

V. Discussion/Conclusion

33 fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION

34 fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

DISCUSSION/ CONCLUSION

35 fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

36

Reasons behind the large percentage of acritical use of the Birth weight references…

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

37

Possible Bias

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

38

The great majority of the people who answered had clinical functions

in the hospital;

The great majority of the people who answered had clinical functions

in the hospital;

In Portugal the Lubchenko curve is the most used, while in the others

countries they prefer national and other curves;

In Portugal the Lubchenko curve is the most used, while in the others

countries they prefer national and other curves;

The great majority answered that they do not use appropriatly the

curves to the newborn/maternal variables, in spite considering this

an important matter.

The great majority answered that they do not use appropriatly the

curves to the newborn/maternal variables, in spite considering this

an important matter.

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

Professor Doutor Altamiro Pereira

Professor Doutor Mário Dinis-Ribeiro

Doutor Ricardo Santos

Francisco Mourão

Eng.º Jorge Jácome

CIDES

39

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

fmupturma16@googlegroups.com

Recommended