View
216
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
International Civil Aviation Organization
Purpose and classification of RSOOs
Grégory LièvreEASA Agreements and External Representation Section
Manager26 October 2011
ICAO RSOO Symposium
2
Outlook
Why should RSOOs be classified?
What could classification criteria be?
Examples
Project title (Insert, Header & Footer)
3
Why should RSOOs be classified?
Observation
: no “one size fits all”
• Existing RSOOs are diverse• Dependent on political, institutional, economical, industrial
and social circumstances• Future RSOOs to benefit from existing solutions
Academic interest
• Inventory to better know RSOOs
Project title (Insert, Header & Footer)
4
Why should RSOOs be classified?Practical interests
Technical assistance: better
knowledge Adapted
solutions (“tool-box” concept)
Defining RSOO « perimeter » =
an essential, early step in
establishing an RSOO
RSOO / RSOO dialogue more
fruitful if mutual knowledge is
more accurate
ICAO / RSOO relations
dependent on nature of RSOO
Project title (Insert, Header & Footer)
5
What could classification criteria be?Potential classification criteria (examples)
Transfer of regulatory powers (yes/no)
Transfer of enforcement powers (yes/no; if yes, type of judicial control)
Technical remit
Regulatory convergence / Standardisation / Mutual recognition
Type of funding
Project title (Insert, Header & Footer)
6
Examples (from AFCAC/EASA Symposium – Livingstone 2009)
Project title (Insert, Header & Footer)
ACSA BAGASOO CASSOA CASSOS EASA
Initialairworthiness
Yes Yes No No Yes
Continuingairworthiness
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Licensing Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
OPS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
ATM/Airport Yes No/Yes Yes Yes Probablyin thefuture
Other fields All ICAOAnnexes
AGA AVSEC All ICAOAnnexes
SAFA,ESSIetc.
Remit (based on 2009 data)
7
Examples (from AFCAC/EASA Symposium – Livingstone 2009)
Project title (Insert, Header & Footer)
ACSA BAGASOO CASSOA CASSOS EASA
Developmentof regulations
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Regulatorypowers (hardlaw)
No No (actthrough the
States)
No No No
Regulatorypowers (softlaw)
YesRAC
System
Yes Yes No,harmonizingactivity only
Yes
Internalisationprocess
None Approvedregulationsgo through
Statesinternal
processes forpromulgation
Proposedthrough
amendment ofCARICOM
HeadsAgreement
None(EU
Treaty)
Regulatory aspects (based on 2009 data)
8
Examples (from AFCAC/EASA Symposium – Livingstone 2009)
Project title (Insert, Header & Footer)
ACSA BAGASOO CASSOA CASSOS EASA
Automaticmutualrecognitionbetweenmembers
Yes Yes Partial/Personnellicenses
Partial Yes
Standardisationmechanism
Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes,under
authorityof EC
Mutualrecognitionwith otherpartners
No Yes No No ThroughBASA(EC)
Mutual recognition (based on 2009 data)
9
Examples (from AFCAC/EASA Symposium – Livingstone 2009)
Project title (Insert, Header & Footer)
ACSA BAGASOO CASSOA CASSOS EASA
Power todelivercertificatesor approvals
No No No Through transnational
mechanism
Yes (e.g. TC,STC, Part-
145approvals
etc.)
Appeals In process Refer toBAGASOOAgreement
No Agreement hasappeal process
for disputesbetweenMembers
Board ofappeal
(Article 44of BR)
Judicialcontrol
AmericanCourt ofJustice
Refer to BAGAgreement
East AfricanCourt ofJustice(EACJ)
CaribbeanCourt ofJustice
EuropeanCourt ofJustice
Executive powers (based on 2009 data)
10
Examples (from AFCAC/EASA Symposium – Livingstone 2009)
Project title (Insert, Header & Footer)
ACSA COCESNA Navigation feeds Annual Budget ~ $ 900 000
BAGASOO State contribution and/or passengersafety charge and service charge
CASSOA Equal Contribution from the Partner Statesthrough the CAAs + Resources mobilised by the Community:~ $1,650,000
CASSOS Equal annual contributions from each Member.Annual Budget approx $480,000 USD including ICAO Observer
EASA Subsidy from the EC + fees and chargesAnnual budget: ~ 100 000 000 €
Funding (based on 2009 data)
Recommended