Integrating Extreme Precipitation into Infrastructure Design · Amec Foster Wheeler, ... Ontario,...

Preview:

Citation preview

April 13 2016

Peter Nimmrichter, M.Eng., P.Eng.

Associate and Climate Change Specialist, Water Resources

Amec Foster Wheeler, Burlington, Ontario, Canada

Integrating Extreme Precipitation

into Infrastructure Design

Presentation Overview

1. What data do we use

2. How do we use the data

3. What are the challenges?

2 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

3 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

What data do we use …

What data we useToday – Return Period Rainfall / IDF

4 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

What data we useToday – Recorded Rainfall Events

5 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

6 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

What data we useToday – Radar

7 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

What data we useFuture – Projected Daily Data

8 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

What data we useFuture – Projected IDF

μ

x

x’

μ’

Linear

model

9 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

What data we useFuture – Approved for use data

10 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

What data we useCurrent/Future – Probable Maximum Precipitation

1961

1982

2006

11 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

How do we use

the data …

12 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

How we use the dataCoronation Blvd, Cambridge Culvert Study

http://conf.tac-atc.ca/english/resourcecentre/readingroom/conference/conf2009/pdf/scheckenberger.pdf

2005/2006

2006-2008

13 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

How we use the dataWelland Ontario, CCVA (2010-2012)

PIEVC

14 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

How we use the dataFlood Risk Map Preparation for Three Watercourses in Newfoundland

15 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

How we use the dataTottenham Airfield

Tottenham Airfield

16 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

How we use the dataTottenham Airfield

Return

Period

24 Hour Rainfall Totals (mm)

2014 Environment Canada IDF Data

Wilcox Lake Oak Ridges Orangeville MOE Maple Egbert CS

2 year 45.9 49.3 39.7 44.5 40.9

5 year 66.0 67.5 50.9 54.8 51.8

10 year 79.4 79.6 58.2 61.5 58.9

25 year 96.2 94.9 67.6 70.1 68.0

50 year 108.7 106.2 74.5 76.5 74.7

100 year 121.1 117.5 81.4 82.8 81.4

Period of

Record

(years)

10 17 10 12 17

Return

Period

24 Hour Rainfall Totals (mm)

2007 Environment Canada IDF Data

Wilcox Lake Oak Ridges Orangeville MOE Maple Egbert CS

2 year 45.9 49.3 n/a 44.5 42.7

5 year 66.0 67.5 n/a 54.8 52.8

10 year 79.4 79.6 n/a 61.5 59.5

25 year 96.2 94.9 n/a 70.1 68.0

50 year 108.7 106.2 n/a 76.5 74.2

100 year 121.1 117.5 n/a 82.8 80.4

Period of

Record

(years)

10 17 n/a 12 13

Indicates no change between 2007 and 2014 IDF data

17 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

How we use the dataTottenham Airfield

Duration

(min)

Design Rainfall Depth (mm) by Return Period

2 year 5 year 10 year 25 year 50 year 100 year

RCP 2.6

5 9.9 12.7 14.6 16.9 18.6 20.4

10 15.3 20.9 24.7 29.2 32.7 36.2

15 19.4 26.8 31.9 38.0 42.7 47.4

30 24.9 35.2 42.3 50.7 56.9 63.0

60 29.4 41.6 50.0 60.0 67.4 74.7

120 32.8 45.0 53.2 62.8 70.2 77.7

360 43.9 61.2 73.1 87.2 98.0 109.0

720 49.3 67.0 78.9 92.9 103.7 114.7

1440 58.0 79.3 93.6 110.6 123.6 136.8

RCP 4.5

5 10.2 13.0 15.0 17.1 18.9 20.6

10 15.9 21.5 25.4 29.6 33.1 36.6

15 19.9 27.5 32.8 38.5 43.2 47.9

30 25.7 36.2 43.4 51.3 57.9 64.4

60 30.3 42.8 51.3 60.8 68.5 76.3

120 34.1 46.2 54.5 63.6 71.1 78.6

360 45.2 62.9 75.0 88.3 99.4 110.3

720 51.1 68.7 80.8 94.0 105.0 115.9

1440 60.2 81.4 96.0 111.9 125.2 138.3

RCP 8.5

5 10.6 13.4 15.2 17.5 19.2 20.9

10 16.7 22.2 25.8 30.4 33.7 37.1

15 21.1 28.5 33.4 39.6 44.1 48.6

30 27.4 37.6 44.3 52.9 59.1 65.3

60 32.2 44.4 52.4 62.6 70.0 77.4

120 36.0 47.8 55.5 65.4 72.5 79.7

360 48.0 65.2 76.5 91.0 101.4 111.9

720 53.9 71.0 82.3 96.7 107.0 117.5

1440 63.5 84.2 97.8 115.1 127.6 140.2

Duration

(min)

Design Rainfall Depth (mm) by Return Period

2 year 5 year 10 year 25 year 50 year 100 year

10th Percentile

5 4.3 6.9 8.7 10.9 12.6 14.3

10 6.8 11.0 13.8 17.4 20.0 22.6

15 8.6 13.9 17.4 21.9 25.2 28.4

30 12.2 19.6 24.4 30.4 34.9 39.3

60 16.6 26.0 32.1 39.7 45.3 50.8

120 22.0 33.3 40.6 49.8 56.5 63.1

360 33.4 47.5 56.6 68.2 76.7 85.1

720 43.1 58.7 69.0 82.0 91.8 101.4

1440 55.4 72.4 83.7 98.3 109.2 120.2

50th Percentile

5 5.8 9.3 11.7 14.7 16.9 19.0

10 9.2 14.9 18.7 23.5 27.0 30.4

15 11.7 18.9 23.7 29.7 34.1 38.4

30 16.6 26.7 33.3 41.6 47.7 53.8

60 22.3 35.5 44.0 54.7 62.6 70.5

120 29.1 45.4 55.9 69.2 79.0 88.7

360 42.8 63.9 77.7 94.9 107.4 119.7

720 53.4 77.5 93.2 112.9 127.3 141.7

1440 65.3 93.1 111.3 133.7 150.3 166.7

90th Percentile

5 6.9 11.1 13.8 17.3 19.9 22.5

10 11.1 17.6 21.9 27.4 31.5 35.6

15 14.1 22.2 27.6 34.4 39.5 44.5

30 19.7 30.9 38.2 47.5 54.3 61.2

60 26.1 40.3 49.6 61.4 70.1 78.8

120 33.2 50.5 61.8 76.2 86.8 97.4

360 46.5 69.2 84.1 103.1 117.2 131.2

720 57.2 83.6 101.2 123.6 140.3 156.8

1440 70.5 100.9 121.4 147.6 167.2 186.5

IDFCC Tool Ontario CCDP Tool (A1B)

18 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

How we use the dataTottenham Airfield

Duration

(min)

Design Rainfall Depth (mm) by Return Period2

2 year 5 year 10 year 25 year 50 year 100 year

5 7.9 10.4 12.5 14.6 16.3 17.9

10 13.2 16.7 19.2 21.7 24.2 26.7

15 15.5 20.5 23.8 27.5 31.3 33.8

30 20.0 26.5 31.0 36.5 40.5 44.5

60 25.0 34.0 41.0 49.0 55.0 61.0

120 28.0 38.0 46.0 54.0 60.0 66.0

360 36.6 50.4 60.0 72.0 78.0 90.0

720 39.6 55.2 66.0 79.2 88.8 98.4

1440 50.4 64.8 74.4 86.4 96.0 105.6

Notes:

1. The IDF curve information is in accordance with Design Chart 1.01(e): District IDF Curves, District 5 -

Owen Sound: for Basins East of Collingwood; Ontario Ministry of Transportation, “MTO Drainage

Management Manual 1997”

2. From Design Chart 1.01(e): District IDF Curves, District 5 - Owen Sound: for Basins East of Collingwood;

Ontario Ministry of Transportation, “MTO Drainage Management Manual 1997”

Town of New Tecumseth

19 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

How we use the dataConfidential Client

Development of short timestep projected rainfall data to support continuous modelling to investigate future LID performance

20 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

How we use the dataSummary

Past and Current data:

Near term trend analysis

Infrastructure design

Development of extreme event hyetographs

Development of future rainfall statistics

Future data:

Sensitivity analysis or stress testing of infrastructure design

Vulnerability analysis

Supports guideline development

21 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

What are the

challenges…

What are the challenges

Existing Data

1. Data accessibility

2. Common platform / GIS geodatabase of rainfall

measurements

3. Standard measurement protocol

4. More stations and more stations

5. Research into inter-station interpolation methods

6. More frequent updating of IDF data

22 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

What are the challenges

Projected Data

1. Understanding different methods / tools

2. Better interoperability amongst tools

3. Understanding models best suited to circumstance

or location

4. Need research into potential impacts of climate

change on PMP

23 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

24 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

"It is often said there are two types of

forecasts ... lucky or wrong!!!!"

in "Control" magazine published by

the Institute of Operations Management

What are the challenges

This doesn’t mean we shouldn’t use them …

but we need to understand the issues

attributed to Rear Admiral Grace Hopper

25

Thank you!

Peter Nimmrichter

Associate and Climate Change Specialist, Water Resources

Burlington, Ontario, Canada

peter.nimmrichter@amecfw.com

1-905-335-2353

26 © Amec Foster Wheeler 2016.

Recommended