Institutional structures for productive use of agricultural water

Preview:

Citation preview

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Sanjiv de SIlva

19th March, 2013, Cambodiana Hotel, Phnom Penh

Session 2: Directions for agricultural water management in

Cambodia: a discussion

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Objectives & Key Questions

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Objectives of the Session

• Recognize issues constraining the PIMT approach to irrigation management

• Generate discussion and debate on options• Less about seeking consensus; more about

a dialogue with in-country experts • Acknowledge the significant in-country

research that underpins these dialogues.

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Key Questions• Try to fix the present system?

– What would it take to do this?

– Is it really worth fixing?

• Consider other models?

– What models are working now? Where are they working best?

– What models should we invest in or explore further?

– What do we do with the existing systems?

• What do we need to do to add value to water?

– What’s done best by the public sector / by the private sector? / by public-private partnerships?

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

PIMT & the Current Sittuation

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

PIMT not working: Do we have a consensus?

• Apparent consensus in many evaluations

• ISF collection nowhere near O&M costs

• Poor leadership in water governance (allocation planning, conflict resolution, etc.)

• Failed to deliver the needed flexibility in water delivery to make irrigation efficient.

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Many Reasons for Status Quo

• Biophysical and geographic restrictions on water availability and delivery

• Inappropriate system design and poor construction impeding equitable water delivery and intensifying O&M burden

• Absence of hydrological data and coordination structures exacerbates conflict over water in dry season

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Many Reasons for Status Quo (2)

• Mandate limited to water: not empowered to address other factors that constrain irrigated agriculture

• Vague linkages in legal framework with more powerful local institutions (e.g. Commune Councils)

• Low farmer technical and organizational capacities and insufficient extension services

• Constraints often mutually re-enforcing

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

So What are the Options?

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Should we…

• Try to fix the present system?

– What would it take to do this?

– Is it really worth fixing?

• Consider other models?

– What models are working now? Where are they working best?

– What models should we invest in or explore further?

– What do we do with the existing irrigation systems?

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Context is important here

• Session 1: need to investigate irrigation options (groundwater, more surface pumping) for conjunctive use– Substitutes to gravity in some areas and

supplementary in others

• Implies spatial variability and institutional forms will need to respond to different irrigation strategies

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Some implications of conjunctive use

• Not a one-size-fits-all approach

• GW will be especially challenging:– Many individual users/groups– Attributing pollution/over-extraction to particular polluters

or pumpers is difficult

• Regulatory options– Command-and-control approaches (e.g. licensing and

metering) is impractical– Indirect approaches like financial disincentives (e.g.

energy pricing) or incentives (e.g. subsidies)– Voluntary compliance involving a wide network of actors,

ranging from the private to the public sector

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Intermediate institutions: A missing link?

• Need for co-ordination at an appropriate hydrological scale is frequently acknowledged

– Especially if irrigation strategies become more diverse

• What should be the appropriate scale?

• Functions and structure?

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Successful Irrigation Management is Not Only About Water

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Value Addition Beyond Water• Success of AWM: access to water + enabling

farmers to make productive use of that water

• Farmers unable to do this individually. Institutions to support collective smallholder action can

• A range of modes for doing this are being tested: private sector entrepreneurs; public-private partnerships; farmer cooperatives

• Can these support AWM by leveraging private entrepreneurship and brokering public-private partnerships?

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Renewed Interest in Farmer Cooperatives (FCs)?

• Promoted as an integrated approach to agricultural development: production and post-harvest processes

• Gaining support with government and donors? • An alternative to FWUCs or another layer?• A private sector model (shareholding) for public

objectives? • Can FCs address some FWUC constraints to

benefit smallholders?

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Small-scale private sector service providers

• Provide a range of rural services: well drillers, pump installers, rainwater jars and water filter suppliers, individuals who collect and deliver water, small companies supplying pipe water to households.

• Creating rapidly expanding water markets with little public sector assistance. Able to leverage funds, offer good quality services and products, and maintain accountability for any problems that arise.

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Small-scale private sector service providers

• IDE’s Farm Business Advisors (FBAs)– Trains independent private micro-

entrepreneurs to provide high-quality agricultural products; in-kind credit; technical advice and market information to small-scale farmers

– Helps low-income households improve, intensify, or expand market-oriented agriculture production.

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Small-scale private sector service providers

• The Cambodia Agricultural Value Chain Program (CAVAC)– Linking suppliers to farmers and farmers to

consumers – Identifies innovations to overcome constraints (e.g.

distance and disconnectedness; poor infrastructure, and scarce resources and information

– Low-cost irrigation; progressive farmers as change agents; using input supplier networks to provide advice to farmers; networks between model farmers, government agencies and private sector.

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Building synergies?

• So several independent initiatives, some structured and managed; others more spontaneous and random, driven by opportunity and initiative

• Each offers potential to ease one or more farmer constraints

• Are there opportunities to enhance their impacts, or will intervention stifle them?

www.iwmi.org

Water for a food-secure world

Thank you

Recommended