View
0
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
National Library I*! of Canada Bibliothèque nationale du Canada
Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques
395 Wellington Street 395, ~e Wellington Ottawa ON K1A ON4 OttawaON K1AON4 Canada Canada
The author has granted a non- exclusive licence ailowing the National Library of Canada to reproduce, loan, distniute or sel1 copies of this thesis in microform, paper or electronic formats.
The author retains owaership of the copyright in this thesis. Neither the thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it may be printed or othexwise reproduced without the author's permission.
L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive permettant à la Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduire, prêter, distriiuer ou vendre des copies de cette thèse sous la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique.
L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. Ni la thése ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement reproduits sans son autorisation.
The impact of harvesting on the nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and carbon (C)
contents ofAscophyZZum nodosum was studied for 13 rnonths after an experimental
harvest at Letite, in the Bay of Fundy, New Brunswick, Canada. Nutrient contents (N, P,
C) were measured in apical tips, mid-sections and basal shoots of intact plants in control
plots and were compared to nutrient contents of the segment of the thallus irnmediately
below truncation due to harvesting and basal shoots in harvested plots. From these
measurements, nutrient ratios (NP, C:N, C:P) were calculated for each part sampled. For
al1 parameters considered, the tissue below the point of harvesting showed nutrient
physiology more similar to that of mid-sections in intact plants than to apical tips. This
was consistent with the observation that d l regrowth on stumps was due to growth of
lateral shoots below the point of truncation and never fkom a new apical meristem. There
was no signincuit difference in the nutrient contents and ratios between basal shoots
below intact and harvested canopies.
I would like to th& Dr. Thierry Chopin for his guidance and encouragement
throughout this project. 1 thank Dr. Kate Frego for much help with experimental design,
statistical analyses and the writing of this thesis. Dr. John Johnson provided many useful
suggestions during the planning of this project and thesis preparation.
1 sincerely thank EUen Belyea for teaching me the laboratory techniques used in
this study and much help with all aspects of the research. Thanks to Tania Morais and
Teri McLean for help with field work. I thank Dr. Matthew Litvak for help with statistical
analyses, and WiIfied Moms and Rabindra Singh for help with cornputer programs.
Finally, I would like to thank my f d y for their confidence and encouragement.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
............................................. TABLE OF CONTENTS iv
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LISTOFTABLES vi
.................................................. LIST OF FIGURES vii
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . m O D U C I l O N 1
................................. Ascoplynum nodosum (L.) Le Jolis 1
Distribution ................................................... 1
............................. Morphology. growth and reproduction 4
Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Nutrients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 i.Nitrogen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
ii.Phospho nu . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
.................................... Uses of Ascophynum nodbsurn 11
Harvestingofrockweed ......................................... 14
Purposeofthestudy ........................................... 16
........................................... Pre-hawest sampling 17
................................................... Harvesting 20
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Post-harvest tagging 20
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Post-harvest sampling 20
Nutrientanalyses .............................................. 21
.................................... i.Nitrogenandcarbon 21
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . LPhosphorus 22
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i i i Seawater autrients 22
S tathtical analyses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Tissue total aitrogen content . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Tissue total phosphoms content . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Tissue total carbon content . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Nitrogen:Phosphorus ratio (N:P) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Carbon:Nitrogen ratio (C:N) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
Carbon:Phosphorus ratio (C:P) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Seawater nutrîents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Nitrogen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Phosphoms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
Carbon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Nutrientlimitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
........................................... hnpactofha~esting 56
................................................... Condusion 59
Futurestudies ................................................ 59
LIST OF TABLES
ms . . . . . . . . . W e s t related tenninology for AscophyIIum nodomm morphology.. 5
One way analysis of variance of nutrient contents and ratios in AscophyfIum nodoszim according to plot. (a) Nitrogen; @) Phosphonis; (c) Carbon; (d) NP ratio; (e) C:N ratio; (f) C P ratio. * Significant at p<0.05,
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ns not signiticant at p>O.O5. 24
Analysis of variance of nitrogen content in Ascop&IIum nodcsum according to month, part, and plot (nested within treatments) (n = 30). . . . . . . 26
Range of tissue total phosphorus, nitrogen and carbon contents in apical and cut tipq mid-sections, and basal shoots fiom control and harvested plots of AscophyZZum nodosum. Values represent means (n = 30) * SE. . . . . . . 28
Analysis of variance of phosphorus content in AscophyIZum n o d o m accordiig to month, part, and plot (nested within treatments) (n = 30). . . . . . . 3 1
Analysis of variance of carbon content in Ascophyllm nodomm accordig to month, part, and plot (nested withh treatments) (n = 30). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Analysis of variance of the N:P ratio in Ascophylum nodosurn according to month, part, and plot (nested within treatments) (n = 30). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Range ofNP, C:N, and C 9 ratios in apical and cut tips, mid-sections, and basal shoots fkom control and hwested plots of AscophyZZum nodosum. Values represent means (n=30) SE. ............................... 39
Analysis of variance of the C:N ratio in Ascophyllum nOd;Osum according to month, part, and plot (nested within treatments) (n = 30). .............. 4 1
Anaiysis of variance of the CrP ratio in AscophyZm nodoszim accordig to month, part, and plot (nested within treatments) (n = 30). ................ 45
Critical nitrogen contents for several seaweeds. ........................ 54
LIST OF FIGURES
Ascophyllm nodosum. A- Apical tip; V-Vesicle; R-Receptacle; P-Primary Eaoe
shoot; S-Stump; C-Cut tip; B-Basal shoots ............................ 2
Distribution ofAscophyI2um nodosum (bold line) dong the Atlantic coasts ..... 3
Two components of algirîic acid: (a) polyrnannuronic acid, @) polyguluronnic acid (after Lobban and Harrison 1994). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Area map of Letite, NB, and study site (arrow). ........................ 18
Layout of the 10 x 10 m plots at the study site. C = Control plots, H = Harvested plots. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Seasonal variations of the tissue total nitrogen content (mg N g DW') of AscophyZZum nodosum collected at Letite, NB. Values represent means
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (n= 30) * SE. 27
Seasonai variations of tissue total phosphorus content (mg P g DW') of Ascophyhm nodosum coliected at Letite, NB. Values represent means (n=3O)*SE.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Seasonal variations of tissue total carbon content (mg C g DWL) of AscophyfIum nodosum coiiected at Letite, NB. Values represent means (n= 30) * SE. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Seasonal variations of the N:P atomic ratio of Ascophyh nodosurn collected at Letite, NB. Values represent means (n = 30) * SE.. . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 Seasonal variations of the C:N atomic ratio of Ascophyllum nodomm coilected at Letite, NB. Values represent means (n = 30) * SE.. ............ 42
Seasonal variations of the C:P atomic ratio of Ascophyllum nodosunt colieaed at Letite, NB. Values represent means (n = 30) * SE.. ............ 44
Seasonal variations of dissolved inorganic N ( Dm; as the sum of NEZ' + NO< + NO;) and dissolved inorganic P (DIP; as PO,$) concentrations in seawater collected at Letite, NB. .................................. 47
(A) Stump showing eut tips (Cl, C2, C3) and lateral shoots (LI, L2, L3) one month aAer harvesting (September 1996). @) The same stump 11 months after hamesting (July 1997), showing no change in cut tips (Cl, C2, C3) and growth of laterai shoots (Ll, L2, L3) below cut tips. .......... 57
-vii-
INTRODUCTION
Ascophy&m nodosum (L.) Le Jolis
AscophyZZum nodowm is a common interiidai brown seaweed of the Order
Fucaleq Family Fucaceae (Fig. 1). It was originally descnied as Funrs nodoszinz L. in
1753 and was transfened to the genus AscophyIJum by Stackhouse as A. laevig-
(Papenfiiss 1950). In 1863, Le Jolis described it as A. nodosum (Baardseth 1970).
Common names used for A. nodosum in Canada are rockweed, bottle kelp and goPrnon &
roche.
Distribution
AscophyZIum nOC(Osum is cornmon throughout the North Atlantic and the adjoining
parts of the Arctic Ocean (Fig. 2). In the notthwest Atlantic, it is found on rocky
substrates from Baf'iin Island to New Jersey, and fiom the Russian Arctic (White Sea) to
northem Portugal in the northeast Atlantic. Within the intertidal zone, it is found Born the
upper intertidal to the mean low tide level (Baardseth 1970). AscophyZZum nodosum
seems to thrive on intermittent exposure to air and is especially abundant in areas of high
tidal amplitude, such as the Bay of Fundy. In areas with no tide, it is nibtidal in shdow
water (Baardseui 1970).
Wave exposure is an important factor determinhg the dimiution ofA. nodom.
Vadas and Wright (1986) observed the oldest plants, highest coverage, growth, and
relative abundance at sheltered sites, although biomass was highest at intermediate
Figure 1 : AscophyIZm nodosum. A-Apical tip; V-Vesicle; R-Receptacle; P-PMnary shoot; S-Stump; C-Cut tip; BBasal shoots (modified fiom Sharp 1987). For description of temis, see Table 1, p. 5.
Figure 2 : Distn ion of AscophyZZltm, nOdDsum @old iine) dong the Atlantic CO-.
exposure. Moderate exposure is believed to provide a refbge fiom ice-scouring
experienced in sheltered sites, and rnay increase the level of numents available to the
plants through water motion (Vadas and Wright 1986). In the Bay of Fundy, however, A.
nodomm is dominant throughout its range, regardless of wave exposure (Thomas et al.
1983).
AscophyZIum nodoswt is considered an euryhaline species. It thrives in salinities
around 32 %O but is tolerant of periodic salinity changes, to as low as 0.0 %O (Baardseth
1970). AscophyZIum nodosum is found at the mouth of the Saint John and Kennebecasis
nvers where salinity may drop to 10 %O (S. Brillant, pers. comm.).
Morpbology, growth and reproduction
Plants ofA. norjosum consist of an irregular discoid holdfast f?om which arises a
compressed linear shoot with no midni. The shoot elongates by apical growth and
branches dichotomously once each year in most individuals (David 1943, Moss 1970). In
spring of each year, new air bladders are produced below the apical tip by swelling of the
shoot. This results in regularly spaced vesicles dong the shoot, each corresponding to one
year of growth (Cousens 1984). Since it is not possible to detennine the number of years
before a basal shoot produces its fim vesicle, the segment fkom the holdfiist to the oldest
vesicle is conservatively assumed to represent at lest one year's growth (Cousens 1984).
Therefore the minimum age of an intact fiond can be determined by counting vesides
dong the primary, unbroken shoot and adding 1 year. Lateral branches mise from pits on
the p r i m q shoot and may be vegetative or reproductive, the latter bearing receptacles.
The teminology used to describe A. nodomm morphology varies among authors.
This study will use the terminology of Cousens (1 98 l), modified by Sharp (1987), to
descn%e harvest related morphology (Table 1, Fig. 1).
Table 1 : Harvest related terminology for AscophyJJum nodomm morphology.
Part Description
Shoot
Primary shoot
Basal shoot
Lateral shoot
Intact shoot
Apical tip
Cut tip
Stump
Frond
Plant
Stand
Vesicle
axis which results âom growth of an apical meristem
shoot originating fiom a single meristematic protnision fiom the hof dfast
unbranched juvenile shoot with no vesicles
shoot uising fiom a lateral pit on another shoot
shoot with at least one apical meristem, no evidence of harvesting
portion of shoot distai to the youngest vesicle, including apical meris t em
the 1.5 cm of tissue below the tnuicated end of a harvested tip
shoot lacking an apical meristem (no apical tip)
the system of shoots derived fkom a single meristematic protmsion from the h o l d h
assemblage of âonds arising âom a common holdfiist
a group of plants within a defined geographical area
vegetative dation at intervals dong the shoot, related to rate of annuai shoot elongation
re~roductive structure found on fertile lateral shoots
AscophyIZuum nodo- is a dioecious species with a garnetic life history. Fertile
receptacles arise one year before maturation, as lateral branches âom nodes of previous
6
seasons' growth (hdoss 1970). In sunken chambers Li the receptacles, calied conceptacles,
antheridia and oogonia produce haploid gametes (Moss 1970). These are released into the
water column where syngamy occun. Full maturation and dehiscence of receptacles
usuaily takes place within one month, after which receptacles decay. The timing of
dehiscence varies yearly (Mathieson et al. 1 W6), with tidal height (David 1943), among
sites (Keser and Larson 1984) and with latitude (David 1943). For example, maximal
dehiscence takes place in March-April in New Hampshire (Mathieson et al. 1976) but not
until May-June in Nova Scotia (MaFarlane 1932) and New BmflSWick (pers. observ.).
Despite a large reproductive effort (Aberg 1 W6), A. nodosum is very slow to
recolonize disturbed patches within its range (Keser et al. 198 1) and is rare in wave-
exposed sites. Although the timing of gamete release is cued by favourable conditions
(Bacon and Vadas 1991), few zygotes establish as successful recmits. Vadas et al. (1990)
found that often one low energy wave rernoved 85.99% of recently settled ygotes fkom
artincial substrates. In addition, growth of established germhgs is very slow compared to
germlings of other fùcoid algae (Sundene 1973). Vegetative propagation by growth of
established basal shoots is considered to contribute more to the alga's dominance than
sexual reproduction (Baardseth 1970).
Production
Seasonal changes in A. nodom biomass Vary among sites and notably with
latitude (David 1943). Generaily, there is a growth spurt in spring, attributed primarüy
to rishg water temperatures and increasing irradîance (Mathieson et al. 1976). Growth
decreases through m e r and fail, with little or no growth through winter (Baardseth
1970, Chock and Mathieson 1983).
Two measures of growth are cornmonly used : elongation and biomass increase.
Elongation for A. nodanm in New England ranges fi0111 1.9 to 2.5 cm mon&'
(Mathieson et al. 1976), to 6 to 10 cm year-' (Vadas and Wright 1986), and 25 and 2 cm
year*' for intertidal and subtidal plants, respectively (Peckol et al. 1988). Sharp (198 1)
estimated an average growth rate of 9 cm yeaf' at a site near Halifax, Nova Scotia
Estimates of total annuai production vary dependiig on the site and method used.
In harvesting experiments, Keser et al. (198 1) estimated total annual production in Maine
to be 1.86 kg DW m-* yeaf'. Westlake (in Cousens 1984) obtained an estimate of 2.0-
2.82 kg DW m-' yeaf' in southwest Nova Scotia, assuming a standing crop of 8 kg DW
ma'. Chock and Mathieson (1983) used the net biomass differences between periods of
minimal and maximal standing crop to calculate a daily production estimate of 8 g DW
m-2 day? Using two methods, with varying assumptions, Cousens' (1984) estimates
ranged Born 0.6 1 to 2.82 kg DW ma* year*!
Confounding factors are the loss of biomass to storms and by ice scouring in
winter (Mathieson et al. 1982, McCook and Chapman 1993). the maturation and release
of receptacles in spring and early summer (Baardseth 1970, Josselyn and Mathieson
1978), and nahird mortality (David 1943).
Nutrients
Although seaweeds take up nutrients over their entire surface area, nutrient
contents are not uniform in al1 parts of morphologically complex species, such as
A. nodosum. There could be differential rates of uptake, incorporation and storage, and
translocation of nutrients fiom parts with low demand to parts with high demand. These
differences among parts genedy lead to high nutrient content miabiliry in growllig
tissues (meristems) and relatively stable contents in older, less active tissues, such as
holdfâsts and stipes (Lobban and Harrison 1994).
i. Nitrogen
Nitrogen (N) is an essentiai elernent for plant growth and development because it
is a structural constituent of amino acids and nucleotides. In temperate coastal systems, N
is the most commonly limiting nutrient, as has been demonstrated by Nt siru seaweed
growth experiments with F m s qiralis L. (Topinka and Robbins 1976). Lamima
l o n g i c ~ s De la Pylaie (Chapman and Craigie 1977) and Lamilullla riigtatu (Huds.)
Lamour. (Davison et al. 1984). Since seaweeds cannot fix inorganic gaseous nitrogen
(Nd, N is taken up primarily as nitrate (NO;) and ammonium (MI;), with some uptake
of nitrite (NO;) and organic forms such as urea and amino acids (Lobban and Harrison
1994).
Tot al N content of seaweeds varies t emporaiiy, geographically, between age
classes (Wheeler and North 1980, Thomas et al. 1985) and within an individual plant
(Ciillanders and Brown 1994). Temporal variations generally parailel changes in extemal
seawater N concentnitb, being highest in winter and lowest in summer in temperate
waters ofthe northem hernisphere (Chapman and Craigie 1977, Hanisak 1983, Wheeler
9
and Srivastava 1984). Asare and Hariin (1983) observed depletion of tissue N before the
end of the spring growth spurt for A. nudosum. This suggested that inorganic N was
taken up fiom extremely low levels in the ambient seawater and incorporated into new
tissue, rather than accumulating as reserves. Intemal NO,' reserves in Inminaria
Iongicruns in Nova Scotia were depleted after seawater NO,' levels dropped in eady
summer (Chapman and Craigie 1977). Growth peaked while NOi reserves were being
depleted and decreased when reserves were exhausted. However, a high growth rate was
maintained at one site by fertiliring the kelp bed with NaNO,. MacPherson and Young
(1952) found no signiticant seasonal variation in the organic N content ofA. ~ O C ~ O S U ~ ,
suggesting that most variation in total N is due to the accumulation and depletion of
inorganic reserves.
When interpreting seasonal variations, attention must be given to which tissue
segment is analysed in rnorphologicdy complex seaweeds. In the fucoid alga Xiphophora
gladuta Rice, N content was highest in spring in the middle part of the plant (Gillanders
and Brown 1994), and dïerences among parts of plant were significant only in
individuals greater than 3 0 cm in total length. It was suggested that the relatively low
physiological activity in the middle section accounted for its high level of N. In A.
nodosan, however, N content was higher in apical tips than in mid-sections (Chopin et al.
1996). These studies dernonstrate that the commonly observed seasonal variations in N
(Asare and Harlin 1983, Hanisak 1983) are not uniform throughaut tissues of
morphologically complex seaweeds.
iL P h o s p h o ~ s
Phosphoms (P) is a constituent of nucleic acids, proteins, phospholipids and many
high energy compounds such as adenosine tri-phosphate (ATP). Algae take up P
primarily as orthophosphates (PO,%) . Other potential sources are inorganic
polyphosphates and organic phosphorus compounds which some seaweeds can use by
producing extracellular aikaline phosphatase (Lobban and Hamison 1994). Phosphoms
may be stored in the vacuole, in polyphosphate vesicles, as phosphorylated metabolites
(Chopin et al. 1990) or polyphosphate granules in the cytoplasm (Chopin et al, 1997).
In some tropical marine environrnents, P cornmonly limits dgal growth (Lobban
and Hamson 1994). In the Florida Keys, Lapointe (1 987) observed higher growth of
Gracilma tikvahiae McLachlan through enrichment with P than with N. The results of
the growth experiment, and elevated C:P and N:P ratios in surnrner, suggested P
limitation.
In temperate waters, P is not usually a limiting nutrient for algd growth.
However, under certain conditions and at certain tirnes of the year, it has been interpreted
as limiting seaweed growth. Wheeler and BjBnisater (1992) considered a N:P ratio
greater than 17 * 6 as evidence of P limitation in Pelvetiopsis limitata Setcheli,
Enteromorpha infestinaZis (Linnaeus) Link., and Ulvo fenestratu Postels et Ruprecht,
whereas a NI ratio less than 12 * 4 was considered indicative of N limitation. Based on
these parameters, they concluded that growth of 5 species of rnacroalgae in the northeast
PaQnc was more often limited by P than by N. Application of these NP thresholds to A.
ncuhstmt and its associated species in the Bay of Fundy would suggest strong P limitation
duMg most of the year (Chopin et al. 1996). However, N limitation has been
demonstrated for C h o h s crispus Stackhouse and phytoplankton in the Bay of Fundy
(Wddish et al. 1993, Chopin et al. 1999, and P limitation was deemed UnlikeIy. The NP
ratio, like certain critical N and P Ievels, may only be refleaive of N and P requirements
and may Vary among species (Chopin et al. 1996).
Uses of AscophyIJum nodosum
Ascophyllum nodomm is harvested for 3 principal uses : animal feeds, fertilizers
and a range of industrial chemicals. It has been used as fodder for livestock in Europe for
centuries (Baudseth 1970). Although low in caloric value and high in mineral content,
rockweed is nch in trace elements and vitamins which makes it a good dietary supplement.
Its use in commercial seaweed meal is estimated to be worth 5 million US$ year*'
(Lobban and Hanison 1994).
AscophyIIum nodosum has a long history of use as a fertiljzer in the British Isles,
Iceland and France (Baardseth 1970). Rockweed may be simply used as âesh or
decomposed material, or as extracted products and fo lk sprays (Waaiand 1981). As a
nutrient additive, it is rich in N, potassium and trace elements but weak in P (South and
Wttick 1987). A benefit of seaweed fertiliren is the absence of weeds and terrestrial
fiingi which may be present in terrestriai manures. It is believed that growth factors such
as auxins, giiberih, cytokinins or abscissic acid may promote seed germination, plant
productivity, and disease and fkost hardimess (Waaland 198 1). Certain fractions of a
commercial A. nociosum preparation were found to stimulate the activity of endogenous
12
vascular plant glycanases, which are involved in the synthesis of pathogenesis-related
proteins (Patier et al. 1993).
By far the most common industrial extract ofA. noalosum is alginic acid. This cell-
wali polysaccharide is cornposed of either pure mannuronic or guluronic acids, or of
blocks of altemating residues (Fig. 3). Alginates are extracted by acid leaching, alkaline
digestion, washing, bleaching, drying and chopping to produce cnide extract of alginate
salts. The salts differ in their properties and uses. Sodium and potassium salts are viscous
alginate liquids, and are used as polishes and coatings for textile and paper production,
and as emulsifiers in paint, food, cosmetics and pharmaceutical sectors to mspend water
immiscible substances. Calcium-alginate salts are used as stabilizers in gels, gums and
molds (South and Whittick 1987).
Beyond its present primary use as an alginate mat* for other drugs (Waaland
198 l), several potential pharmacological uses of extraas from A. nodosum bear fùrther
study. Sterols extracted from A. nodom have shown anti-cholesterol activity in
mammals (Blunden et al. 1975). Alginates fiom A. nodosurm bind cholesterol and lead to
elevated fecal excretion of cholesterol, although there was no consistent change in s e m
total cholesterol levels in rats wshide et a2. 1993). Fucans extracted fiom A. nudbstnn
have demonstrated antiturnor and antiproliferative activity against a human
bronchopuhonary carcinoma (Riou et al. 1996). Although these studies are only
preliminary, they clearly establish biological activity, and potentiai chical use, of
polysaccharides fiom A. ndsrrm.
i @ COOH <' ...-Bq q (HO o.-,. : HO 1 I
COOH I I !
Figure 3 : Two components of a l e c acid: (a) polymaf]nuronic a d , @) polyguiuronnic acid (der Lobban and Harrison 1994).
Harvesting of rockweed
There has been a long history of rockweed harvesting in Europe and Eastern
Canada. Since 1959 there has been commercial-scde harvest ofA. nodomm in Nova
Scotia (NS) for extraction of alginates. ûfthe esthated standing crop of 180 000 to 240
000 wet tonnes (WT) within the harvesting area in southwest NS, 6 000 WT were
harvested a ~ u a l i y in the early 1980s (Sharp 198 1) and between 20 000 and 30 000 WT
in the late 198091 early 1990s (Chopin 1998). A pilot harvest of A. n&mm began in NB
in 1995 based on a harvestable resource exceeding 140 000 WT, with an annual pilot
harvest of 10 000 WT. Evidence fiom Europe and North America has show that
excessive, unregulated seaweed harvesting can be detrimental to the harvested population
and to its community Wght and Parke 1950, Boney 1965, Baardseth 1970, Keser et al.
198 1). Seaweed beds are important habitats because they moderate local
environmental conditions by serving as a breakwater at high tide and a moist protective
blanket at low tide (Lobban and Harrison 1994). Seaweeds are also important for nutrient
cycling and primary productivity in coastal marine systems. AscophylZum n&- is the
dominant organism within much of its range, providing food for grazers (Lubchenco
1978) and substratum for epibiota (Sharp et al. 1997, Cardinal and Lesage 1992, Lining
and Garbary 1992). For these reasons there has been public conceni over the potentially
detrimental impact ofrockweed hamesting in New Brunswick
For the deveiopment of a sustainable management of the rockweed resource, and
consistency of the products exîracted fiom it, it is essentid to assess the impact of
harvesting. Recovery of A. nodosrmi beds after hamesting is dependent upon site
15
productivity, size distriiution of the standing crop, presence or absence of grazers, and
degree and method of harvesting (Keser et al. 198 1, Sharp 1987). In southwest NS, when
sites were left with ca. 40 % residual biomasq harvestable biomass recovered after 1 year
(Sharp 1987). Most regrowth was attniuted to elongation of basal shoots and the
initiation of new lateral branches on stumps. Lazo and Chapman (1996) found that
growth rates were higher in harvested plots than in controls, regardless of intensity or
season of harvest, and that the srnailest shoots contniuted the most to population
regrowth. Successive annual harvesting in Maine Ied to declining yields over a 3 year
experiment (Keser et al. 198 1). However, Keser et ai. (198 1) concluded that with
d c i e n t residual biornass and less muen t harvesting, complete recovery was possible.
Sharp (198 1) suggested that cutting may enhance production, because "primary growing
points will not be reduced in proportion to shoot truncation since the majority of primary
shoots are below 15 cmy7. The capacity of the srnailest shoots to restore biomass
foilowhg harvest supports a harvesting strategy (a) aimed at the largest plants in a stand,
@) which does Mnimal damage to holdfasts.
Under the Federal Fisheries Act of 1977, it was stipulated that "no person shall
harvest rockweed unless he uses an instrument that severs with a cutting action and leaves
a length of at least 5 inches (12.5 cm) above the holdfâst." Of the two harvesting methods
being used in NS, hand-&g and mechanical harvester, the former was found to remove
more holdfksts fiom the substratum (1 6.1 8.4 % by weight) than the latter (1 -9 * 1.1
%) (Sharp 1981). For sociosconomic reasons, however, hawesting in NB is done with
hand-des, modined to prevent cutting below 25 cm. A harvesting agreement developed
16
by the Canadian and New Brunswick governments stipulates that physicd disruption of
the substrate and holdfàst removal must be minimal. Mean cutting height must be at least
25 cm, and the maximum allowable h e s t in any one area is 50 % by weight.
Purpose of the study
The purpose of the present shidy was to assess the impact of harvesting of A.
nodosam by measuring the physiological response of shoots truncated by harvesting. To
help explain how truncated shoots regrow, and how basal shoots respond to the thinring
of the adult canopy, nutnent (N, P, C) contents were measured as a relatively stable, rnid
to long-term (1 year) indicator of physiological activity. Nîtrogen, P and C contents of
intact apical tipq cut tips, Md-sections, and basal shoots were meamred for 14 months
following harvesting. Differences in the total nutrient contents, nutrient ratios (C:N, N:P,
C:P), and their pattern of seasonal variations were used to investigate the impact of
hawesting.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study Site
The study site was a stretch of rocky shoreline dong Letite Nanows in southwest
New Brunswick, Canada pig.4). The area is moderately exposed and the substratum is
mostly soiid rock with some boulder fields. AscophyIZm nodosunt is the dominant
seaweed in this site, ranghg âom the high intertidal zone to low water mark. with an
average biomass of 9.4 kg mo2 (R. Ugarte, pers. cornrn.). By agreement between the
Province of New Brunswick, Acadian Seaplants Ltd. and hamsters, no commercial
hawesting takes place within this designated study site.
Experimental plots
Six permanent 10 x 10 m quadrats were established in July 1996 : 3 treatment (to
be harvested), and 3 controls (Fig. 5). Quadrats were simiiar in elevation, lying in the rnid
intertidal zone. The substratum of two of the treatment and one control plots was typified
by boulders, whereas the other three plots lay mostly on solid rock.
Pre-hiwest srmphg
On July 5, 1996, 10 randomly selected entire plants h m each plot were
destmaively sampled dong with several (4-5) basal shoots from the holdf'ast of each
plant. Basai shoots were Iess than 10 cm in length and lacked vesicles. Although they
were associated with the addt holdfast, it was not determined ifbasal shoots were
geneticdy related to the ad& plant sampled.
Figure 4 : Area map of Letite, NB, and study site (arrow).
Figure 5 : Layout of the 10 x 10 m plots at the study site. C = Control plots, H = Harvested plots.
Ha mes ting
On July 20, 1996, commercial harvesters were instmcted to harvest within the
treatment plots of the study site. This was done with rakes at Md-tide and approxhately
17 % of the biomass was rernoved âom each plot accordmg to usual harvesting practices
(G. Sharp, pers. corn.).
Post-harvcst tagging
In order to ensure that harvested plants (stumps) would be identifiable and
distinguishable Born natudy truncated plants for the duration of the study (1 year), rake
truncated (hawested) plants were tagged within one week of harvesting. Harvested plants
were easily identifiable by a clean, &sh cut across the main axis and laterds. Stumps
were tagged with Trilene" fishing line and neoprene tags, which have been shown to
cause minimal damage (Sharp and Tremblay 1985).
In each harvested plot, 10 uclumps" of stumps were tagged. The stump showing
evidence of harvesting, closest to a random CO-ordinate, was first tagged. The 15 next
closest harvested sturnps were tagged with the same identification, up to a 1 m radius of
the first tagged stump. This constituted a "clump" fiom which tagged stumps could be
destnictively sampled monthly for a year, dong with the associated basai shoots.
Post-harvest sampling
Each month, beginning in August 1996, 10 ta@ stumps, and associated basal
shoots, were destmcîively sampled fiom each harvested plot. In each control plot,
random coordinates were used to sample 10 plants and associated basal shoots.
Seaweeds were fiozen (-20°C) within 5 hours of sampiing. Tissue fiom the apical
and Md-sections of each control plant were analyzed for nutrient content. The apical
portion was initiaily defined as the entirety of the growing tips, distal to the newest vesicle
formed. This was, however, an impractical definition since during the formation of new
vesicles in the spring there was not enough tissue above the newest tip to analyze reliably.
Therefore, it was decided to use the top 1.5 cm of each tip, regardless of vesicles, as the
apical tip. The Md-section was defined as the portion of the primary shoot 25-30 cm
from the holdfast. This corresponds to the minimal height at which plants should be
twcated by harvesting rakes, due to the 25 cm protective cages on the rakes. Ifthe
control plant was less than 25-30 cm in height, a section of tissue was taken at the mid-
height of the shoot. For stumps, the top 1.5 cm below the tnincation were analyzed. This
was referred to as a cut tip. For basal shoots from control and harvested plots* 4-5 entire
shoots were dried and analysed for each plant sampled.
Nutrien t anaiyses
i. Carbon and nitrogen
The tissue portions to be analysed were dried for 48 hours at 60' C before
approximately haif of the sample was ground to a fine, homogeneous powder using a
Retsch mixer miii. The powder was again dried for a minimum of 48 hours before being
d y s e d using a Perkin Elmer 2400 Series II CHNS/O elemental analyzer.
22
ii. Phosphoms
Tissue total P content was measured by the method of Murphy and Riley (1962)
after acid mineralization K S O , and HNO3 in Büchi 430 and 435 digester units.
iii. Seawater nutrients
At each sampling date, 3 d a c e water samples were collectecl in s m d (125 ml)
high density polyethylene boales and immediately k e n upon returning to the laborato~y
(within 1 hour). Dissolved inorganic P @Il?; as PO,*) and N @IN; as the sum of N'Hl +
NO; + NO,? concentrations in seawater were measured by the rnethods of Murphy and
Riley (1962) and Grasshoff et al. (1983), respectively, using a Technicon Autoanalyser II
segmented flow analyser.
S tatistical analyses
Prior to ANOVq aU data were tested for depamires corn norrnality using the
Shapiro-Wilk statistic generated by the SAS procedure UNIVARlATE (SAS 1990, Cody
and Smith 1991), and no transformation was necessary. Data were also tested for
homogeneity of variance using an F,, test (Sokal and Rohlf 1995), and no transformation
was necessary.
Initial analyses of nutrient (N. P, C) contents and ratios (C:N, C2, N:P) for pre-
harvest samples (July 1996) were performed using a one-way ANOVA to determine if
there were significant daerences among plots prior to harvesting. There were indeed
signiIicst~lt clifferences among plots for P content and NT ratio @ c0.05, Table 2).
23
Therefore, to account for the potential confounding of plot and hamesting effects, data
fiom each plot were nested within the treatments in a nested ANOVA design. For the
sake of consistency, this was done for the analyses of al dependent variables (N content, P
content, C content, and C:N, C:P, NP ratios).
Table 2 : One way analysis of variance of pre-harvest nutrient contents and ratios in Ascophyllum nodanrm according to plot. (a) Nitrogen; (b) Phosphorus; (c) Carbon; (d) NP ratio; (e) C:N ratio; (f) C:P ratio. *SiZpiificant at p<0.05, ns not siBnificmt at pW.05.
Source DF Sums of Squares Mean Square F Vaiues
(a) Nitrogea Content
Plot
Corrected Totd 174 1629.81
@) Phosphorus Content
Plot 5 4.2 1 O. 84
Error 171 58.28 0.34
Corrected Totd 176 62.49
(c) Carbon Content
Plot 5 1 374.44 274.89
Error 169 24 948.50 147.62 -- -
Corrected Total 174 26322.94
(d) N:P Ratio
Plot 5 271.3 1 54.26
Error 167 3 212.76 19.24 - --
Corrected Total 172 3 484.07
(e) C:N Ratio
Plot 5 325.45 65.09
Error 169 6474.03 38.3 1
Corrected Total 174 6 799.48
( f ) C:P Ratio
Plot 5 165 496.52 33 099.30
Error 167 3776345.81 22 612.85
Corrected Total 172 3941842.33
RESULTS
Tisue total nitrogen content
Ali main &ects and interactions were signincant sources of variation in the N
content of A. nodoam (Table 3). There was a significant variation in N content by month
('p0.0001) and by part @<0.0001), with a sipifkant interaction between these 2 &-S.
Tukey post hoc tests were mn for each month to interpret the month by part interaction,
and to aid in the discussion of the plotted data (Fig. 6). There were significant Merences
arnong plots, nested within treatments, @<0.00 1) and significant interactions between
month and part effects. The differences among plots, nested within treatments, were
determineci using a Tukey test for grand means and for the interaction e e c t with month.
Although significant, no consistent patterns emerged in the merences among plots and no
attempt was made to explain this variation.
Nitrogen was not distributed unifody throughout the plant, and apical parts had
seasonal variations (Fig. 6, Table 3). For five months foliowing harvesting, N content in
apical tips was not signincantly different fiom that of basal shoots. Starting in December
1996, there was a strong winter-early spring peak, reaching a maximum of 26.67 0.48
mg N g DWL in Apd 1997 (Table 4). Throughout the sumer, tissue N content in
apical tips rehimed to levels similar to those of basal shoots, reacbg a minimum of 16.96
0.44 mg N g DW' in August 1997.
Table 3: Andysis of variance of nitrogen content in Ascophyllm nodosum according to month, part, and plot (nested within treatments) (n = 30).
Source DF Sum of Mean F Vdues Pr >F Squares Square
Month 12 5 033.92 419.49 92.61 0.000 1
Pm 3 13743.96 4581.32 1011.43 0.0001
Part *Plot(Treat) 6 154.10 25.68 5.67 0.000 1
Month*Part*Plot(Treat) 70 436.47 6.24 1.38 0.0228
Corrected Total 1 917 32 717.51
APICAL TlPS
MID-SECTIONS
BASAL SHOOTS (CONTROL
CUT TlPS
BASAL SHOOTS (HARVESTE
PLOTS)
D PLOTS)
I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 I
J A S O N D J F M A M J J A
Month
Figure 6 : Seasonal variations of the tissue total nitrogen content (mg N g DW3 of Ascop@IIum nOLtD~~lltt collected at Letite, NB. Values represent means (n = 30) * SE.
Table 4: Ranges of tissue total phosphoms, Ntrogen and carbon contents in apical and ait tips, Md-sections, and basal shoots ftom control and harvested plots of Ascophyhm nodosum. Values represent means (n = 30) * SE.
segment Tissue total P content Total tissue N content Total tissue C content (mg P g DW1) (mg N g DW-' ) (mg C * g DW')
Apical tips
highest content 2.68 * 0.07 (March 1997)
1.72 * 0.06 (August 1997)
26.67 * 0.48 (Aprii 1997)
16.96 * 0.44 (August 1997)
379.0 2.2 (August 1997)
lowest content 353.2 * 1.4 (July 1996)
Cut tips
highest content 2.01 * 0.08 (July 1996)
18.12 * 0.68 (July 1997)
382.2 * 5.1 (August 1997)
353.7 2.3 (July 1996)
lowest content 11 S6 * 0.26 (October 1996)
Mid-sections
highest content 1.83 * 0.09 (July 1997)
15.97 0.26 (September 1996)
377.5 k 1.8 (August 1997)
lowest content 1.42 0.05 (October 1996)
Basal shoots (control)
highest content 2.93 i 0.07 (February 1997)
2 1.34 * 0.4 1 (April 1997)
17.05 * 0.39 (July 1996)
367.2 i 1.7 (August 1997)
345.0 =i 1.6 (July 1996)
lowest content 2.32 * O. 1 1 (October 1996)
highest content 3.09 * 0.09 (March 1997)
2.24 * 0.08 (August 1997)
22.26 0.53 (July 1997)
16.66 * 0.35 (July 1996)
366.9 * 1.2 (August 1997)
345.4 * 1.7 (July 1996)
lowest content
29
Cut tips were clearly more similas to mid-sections than to apical tips with respect
to N content and seasonai variations. While cut tips and Md-sections differed significantly
in tissue N contents for the two months following harvesting in July 1996 (Eg. 6), tiiey
had similar N content with the same pattern of variations fiom October 1996 to June
1997. In July and August 1997, they again dEered signincantly in N content. The
minimai tissue N content in rnid-sections was 12.50 * 0.3 1 mg N g DW' in July 1996
and the maximal level was 15.97 * 0.26 mg N g DW' in July 1997. In cut t ips the
minimal content was 1 1.56 * 0.26 mg N g DW1 in October 1996 and the maximai
content was 18.12 * 0.68 mg N g DW' in July 1997.
The N contents of basal shoots from control and harvested plots were not
significantly dEerent for any month except August 1997. In al1 basal shoots there was a
steady increase in N content fiom December 1996 to April 1997; N content then dropped
to the Iate-surnmer levels of 1996, after a peak in Jdy 1997. The lowest N content
measured was 16.66 * 0.3 5 mg N g DWœi for a harvested plot basal shoot in July 1996
and the highest N content measured was 22.26 0.53 mg N g DW' for July 1997 for
basal shoots fiom a harvested plot (Table 4).
Tissue total phosphonis content
Phosphorus was not distributed unifody throughout the plant and varied
signiticantly with season and among plots (Fig. 7, Table 5). In addition, the interactions
among all main effects were significant sources of variations in the P content of
+ APICAL TlPS
+ MID-SECTIONS
.,..o~... BASAL SHOOTS (CONTROL PLOTS)
+ CUT TlPS
- - -0- - - BASAL SHOOTS (HARVESTED PLOTS)
J A S O N D J F M A M J J A
Month
Figure 7 : Seasonal variations of tissue total phosphorus content (mg P g DW1) of AscophyZZum n&strm coUected at Letite, NB. Vdues represent means (n = 30) SE.
Table 5: Analysis of variance of phosphorus content in Ascop~ZIum noabmm according to month, part, and plot (nested within treatrnents) (n = 30).
Source DF Sum of Mean F Vdues Pr > F Squares Square
Month 12 47.04 3 -92 17.92 0.000 1
Part 3 365.09 121.70 556.22 0.0001
Part *Plot(Treat) 6 3 .O5 0.5 1 2.32 0.0309
Corrected Total 1 907 871.42
32
A. nodomm (Table 5). Phosphorus content had significant variation by month @<0.0001)
and especiaiiy by part @<0.0001, F value = 556.22), with a signifiant interaction between
these 2 effects. Tukeypost hoc tests were mn for each month to interpret the month-by-
part interaction., and aid in the discussion of the plotted data
Fig* n* Tissue total P content was dways highest in basal shoots (control or harvested
plots) and lowest in the rnid-sections and cut tips. Mean P content ranged fiom 1.42 * 0.05 mg P g DWL for mid-sections in October 1996 to 3 .O9 * 0.09 mg P g DW1 for
harvested plot basal shoots in March 1997 (Table 4). Marked seasonal variations were
observed ody in the apical tips where P accumulated in winter to a maximum of 2.68 * 0.07 mg P g DW1 in March 1997 and dropped in late spring and summer to a minimum
of 1.72 * 0.06 mg P g DWL in August 1997.
DifEerences in the P content of mid-sections and cut tips were not significant for
any month. These two parts followed similar patterns of relatively low P content, with no
seasonal variation. As with N contents, P contents of cut tips were clearly more shiiar to
nid-sections of intact plants than to apical tips. Minllnal P content of mid-sections was
recorded in October 1996 (1.42 * 0.05 mg P g DW4) and the rnaxllnal P content in Jdy
1997 (1.83 * 0.09 mg P g Dw-'). Minimal P content in cut tips was observed in January
1997 (1.50 * 0.05 mg P g DW-') and the maximal P content before harvesting in July
1996 (2.01 * 0.08 mg P g DWL).
AU basal shoots had the same pattern ofrelatively hi& P levels and seasonal
variations, ody Mering significantly in July 1996 (Fig. 7). In control basal shoots, P
33
content was lowest in October 1996 (2.32 * 0.11 mg P g DW') and bighest in February
1997 (2.93 * 0.07 mg P g DW1). In basal shoots fiom harvested plots, P content was
lowest in August 1997 (2.24 h 0.08 mg P g DW1) and highest in March 1997 (3 .O9
0.09 mg P g DWL).
Tissue total carbon content
Carbon was not dimiuted uniformiy throughout the plant (Fig. 8, Table 6).
Although the month of sampling was a highly sipüicant source of variation (Table 6), no
consistent pattern of seasonal variations was evident in any of the tissues sampled (Fig. 8).
The other main effect (plot) was a significant source of variation, as were the two-way
interactions among di main effects (Table 6). Tissue C content ranged fiom 345.0 * 1.6
mg C g DWwL for control basal shoots before harvesting (July 1 W6), to 3 82.2 h 5.1 mg C
g DW1 for cut tips in August 1997 (Table 4).
In apical tips, C content varied little with season other than an increase from a
minimum in July 1996 (353.2 1.4 mg C g DW3 to a maximum in August 1997 (379.0
* 2.2 mg C g DW1; Table 4).
Cut tips had the highest mean tissue C content in each month, except Jdy 1996
and March 1997. Carbon content of cut tips was significantly higher than that of nid-
sections except in September 1996, January, March, April, July and August 1997 when it
was not significantly diierent fiom mid-sections (Fig. 8). In mid-sections, C content was
not signincantiy dEerent âom that of apical tips ia al months except July, September,
--tl- APICAL TIPS
+ MID-SECTIONS
----o.... BASAL SHOOTS (CONTROL PLOTS)
--i-- CUT TlPS
BASAL SHOOTS (HARVESTED PLOTS)
I 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
J A S O N D J F M A M J J A
Figure 8 : Seasonal variations of tissue total carbon content (mg C g DW3 of Ascophylum nodostmt coIIected at Letite, NB. Values represent means (n = 30) * SE.
Table 6: Analysis of variance of carbon content in AscophyIIum norilostan according to month, part, and plot (nested within treatments) (n = 30).
Source DF Sumof Mean F P r > F Squares Square Values
Month
Par&
Month*Part
Plo t(Treat)
Month*Plot(Treat)
PartZPlot(Treat)
Month*Part*Plot(Treat)
Error
Conected Total 1 917 340 390.99
36
October 1996, and May 1997. It reached a minimum in December 1996 (364.0 * 1.7 mg
C g DW1 ) and a maximum in August 1997 (377.5 * 1.8 mg C g DW'; Table 4).
Basal shoots fiom control and harvested plots dEered significantly from each
other in C content only in December 1996 (Fig. 8). They had significantiy lower C
contents than all other tissues, except in September and December 1996 when basal shoots
from harvested plots were not significantfy dXerent h m apical tips, and Li April 1997
when control plot basal shoots were not significantly different fiom apical tips. There was
no obvious trend to the merences between the basal shoots of each plot type. Tissue C
content in basal shoots of control and harvested plots had no seasonal variation other than
a steady increase. In both control and hawested plot basal shoots, C content was lowest
in July 1996 (345.0 * 1.6 and 345.4 1.7 mg C g DWi, respectively) and highest in
August 1997 (367.2 * 1.7 and 366.9 * 1.2 mg C g DW1, respectively; Table 4).
Nitrogen:Phosphorus ratio (Nd?)
The N:P ratio had some marked spatial and rnonth-to-month variation, but the
overali seasonal variation was relatively low (Fig. 9). AU main effects were sources of
highly significant variation (Table 7). There were significant interactions between month
and plot, and between plot and part (Table 7). The N9 ratio ranged fiom 14.0 * 0.8 for
harvested basai shoots in M y 1996 to 24.9 * 1.2 for cut tips in July 1997 (Tabfe 8).
Apical tips had significantly higher N P ratios than any other tissues for most
months of the study penod. It ranged fiom 18.2 * 0.7 in Decernber 1996 to 23.0 * 0.8 in
May 1997 (Table 8). Seasonal variations were difncdt to interpret, but the NP ratio was
+ APICAL TIPS
,,+,,. MID-SECTIONS
-...O*.- BASAL SHOOTS (CONTROL PLOTS)
-+- CUT TIPS
--+,, BASAL SHOOTS (HARVESTED PLOTS)
J A S O N D J F M A M J J A
Month
Figure 9 : Seasonal variatiom of the N2 atomic ratio of AscophyZIum n&szim collected at Letite, NB. Values represent means (n = 30) SE.
Table 7: Analysis of variance of the N:P ratio in AscophyIIum nnodchMn according to rnonth, part, and plot (nested within treatments) (n = 3 0).
Source DF Sum of Mean F Values Pr >F Squares Square
Month 12 2 270.33 189.19 1 1.77 0.0001
Part 3 6 675.78 2 225.26 138.40 0.0001
Corrected Total 1904 44 113.11
Table 8: Ranges ofNP, C:N and C3? ratios in apical and cut tips, Md-sections, and basal shoots fkom control and harvested plots of AscophyIZum nodosum. Values represent means (n = 30) * SE.
Apicai tips
highestcontent 26.6 i 0.7 (August 1997)
16.3 0.3 (April 1997)
lowest content 362.6 * 10.0 (March 1997)
Cut tips
highest CO-t 38.6 * 0.9 (October 1996)
681.1 * 50.4 (September 1996)
lowest content 15.8 * 0.5 (October 1996)
Mid-sections
highest content 21.3 0.8 (April 1997)
682.0 39.4 (October 1996)
iowest content 27.5 0.5 (September 1996)
555.2 k 25.9 (July 1997)
Basai shoots (control)
higllest content 16.9 * 0.6 (August 1997)
420.1 1 15.8 (August 1997)
10- content
Basal shoots -1
highest content 19.0 * 0.7 WY 1997)
14.0 * 0.8 (July 1996)
24.9 ~t 0.7 (August 1997)
18.9 * 0.5 ( M y 1997)
436.7 14.7 (August 1997)
lowest content 304.6 9.5 (March 1997)
lower in winter and higher in swnmer (Fig. 9).
Afthough there were significant dEerences in many months in N:P ratio between
mid-sections and cut tips, neither was consistently higher than the other (Fig. 9).
Both types of basal shoot had little variation âom July 1996 to February 1997, but
then increased in the N:P ratio for the rest of the study penod. There were signifiant
differences in the N:P ratio observed in many months, but without any particular trend.
CarbomNitrogen ratio (C:N)
The C:N ratio varied si@cantly by month, part, and plot, with sigdcant two-
way interactions among ali main effects (Table 9, Fig. 10). It ranged fiom 16.3 * 0.3 for
apical tips in April 1997, to 38.6 0.9 for cut tips in October 1996 (Table 8). For ail
tissue types except apical tips, C:N ratio decreased steadily throughout the study penod,
with a marked increase in August 1997.
The C:N ratio of the apical tips was not signincantly dEerent fiom that of basal
shoots, except from December 1996 to June 1997. Apical tip C:N ratio was lowest in
Apd 1997 (16.3 * 0.3) and reached a high of 26.6 * 0.7 in August 1997 (Table 8).
The C:N ratio was similar in rnid-sections and cut tips for most of the year, despite
some si@cant Merences directly before and after harvesting and for Tanuary and
August 1997 10). The C:N ratio in these two tissue types was always higher than
Table 9: Analysis of variance of the C:N ratio in AscophyIZum nodostrm according to month, part, and plot (nested within treatments) (n = 30).
Source DF Sum of Mean FValues Pr>F Squares Square
Month 12 925 5 -26 77 1.27 66.51 0.000 1
Part 3 39 936.8 1 13 3 12.27 1 147.93 0,0001
-
Corrected Total 1917 83 192.35
+ APICAL TlPS
..-+... MID-SECTIONS
----O---- BASAL SHOOTS (CONTROL PLOTS)
-*- CUT TlPS
- - -e- - - BASAL SHOOTS (HARVESTED PLOTS) r
Figure 10 : Seasonal Vanations of the C:N atomic ratio of A s c o p ~ h m nOdDsum coiiected at Letite, NB. Values represent means (n = 30) * SE.
43
in either basal shoots or apical tips. Mid-sections and cut tips showed their Iowest C:N
ratios in September 1996 (27.5 0.5) and July 1996 (24.9 * 0.9), and their highest C:N
ratio in December 1996 (34.5 * 0.8) and October 1996 (38.6 * 0.9), respectively
(Table 8).
Basal shoots fiom both control and harvested plots difred ody slightly fiom each
other in the levels and pattern of seasonai changes in C:N ratio (Fig. 10). It ranged from
20.1 * 0.4 (April 1997) to 24.2 * 0.6 (November 1996) for basal shoots fiom control
plots and flom 18.9 * 0.5 (May 1997) to 24.9 * 0.7 (August 1997) for basal shoots fkom
harvested plots (Table 8). The C:N ratio varied seasonaiiy, decreasing slightly f?om
December 1996 to May 1997, and then increasing in surnmer, except in July 1997.
Carbon:Phosphorus ratio (C:P)
The C:P ratio varied spatiaily within the plant and seasonally throughout the study
period (Fig. 1 1) fiom a minimum of 304.6 9.5 for basal shoots fiom harvested plots in
March 1997 to a maximum of 682.0 39.4 for mid-sections in October 1996 (Table 8).
AU the main efFkcts, and two-way interactions among them. were highiy signincant (Table
10). The C 9 ratio was always the highest in either mid-sections or cut tips; basal shoots
consistently showed the lowest CP ratio. In apical tips, the C:P ratio was intemediate
with marked seasonal variations, being lowest in winter (362.6 10.0 in March 1997) and
highest in late mer-fall(504.4 * 34.0 in October 1996, 594.9 * 19.1 in August 1997;
Table 8).
-+ APICAL TlPS
-+- MID-SECTIONS
O-.. o..-- BASAL SHOOTS (CONTROL PLOTS)
---+- CUT TlPS
-,-+,, BASAL SHOOTS (HARVESTED PLOTS)
Month
Figure 11 : Seasonal variations of the CT atomic ratio of AscophyZIum nodoszim coiieaed at Laite, NB. Values represent means (n = 30) * SE.
Table 10: Anaiysis of variance of the C:P ratio in AscophyZm n o & m according to month, part, and plot (nested within treatments) (n = 30).
Source DF Sum of Mean F Values Pr > F Squares Square
Month
Part
Month*Part
PIot(Treat)
Month4Plot(Treat)
PutWot(Treat)
Monthspart *Plot(Treat)
Error
Corrected Total
46
In mid-sections and cut tips, the C:P ratio was generally the sarne, as was the
pattern of seasonal variation, although there were significant dEerences between them for
certain months (Fig. 1 1). The lowest C:P ratios were observed in July 1997 for mid-
sections (555.2 k 25.9) and in March 1997 for cut tips (533.3 * 22.6). The highest C P
ratio for mid-sections was recorded in October 1996 (682.0 * 39.4) and for cut tips in
September 1996 (681.1 * 50.4). In both tissue types, the C:P ratio had a slight increase
in surnmer and decrease in winter, although these variations were not as pronounced as in
apical tips.
Aithough there were significant dserences in C:P ratio of control and harvest
basal shoots at certain times (Table 10). the seasonal pattern and range observed were
similu. The C:P ratio of harvested plot basal shoots varied slightly throughout the study
penod, fiom a low of 304.6 9.5 in March 1997, to a high of 436.7 * 14.7 in August
1997.
Seawater nutrients
Dissolved inorganic N concentrations ranged âom 2.5 &l (Jdy 1996) to 10
(September 1996). They v&ed seasondy, being high in winter and dropping in spring,
with late surnmer peaks in both years (Fig. 12). Dissolved inorganic P concentrations
were much lower, and ranged fiom 0.54 to 1.73 @M. There were late surnmer peaks, as
observed for Dm.
J A S O N D J F M A M J J A
Figure 12 : Seasonal variations of dissolved inorganic N ( Dm, as the sum of NE,+ + NO; + NO,') and dissolved inorganic P (DIP; as PO,*) concentrations in seawater coiIected at Letite, NB.
DISCUSSION
Nitmgen
The pronounced seasonal variations of tissue total N contents in apical tips are
typical for seaweeds in temperate marine systems (Baarâseth 1970, Moss 1970, Mathieson
et al. 1976, Komfeldt 1982, Hanisak 1983, Asare and Harlin 1983, Vadas and Wright
1986, Sharp 1987). Although tissue N content generally parallels seawater N
concentration, the peaks in seawater in late summer are not reflected in the algal tissue.
This may be because this is a period of active growth when di N taken up would be used
in growth and not accumulate (Chopin et al. 1990).
The range of N contents observed in this study for al1 parts (1 1.6 to 26.7 mg N g
DWi) is similar to other reported ranges for A. nodanm: 10 to 18 mg N g DW' in
Nova Scotia, 16 to 28 mg N g DWi in New Brunswick (Macfherson and Young 1952),
and 10 to 28 mg N g DW' in Rhode Island (Asare and Harlin 1983). Lower values (6.5
to 12 mg N g DWi) were reported by Jensen for A. nodomm in Norway (1960, in Moen
et al. 1997).
MiwimaI values for apical tips (26.7 mg 1q - g DWi) and rnid-section (16.0 mg N
g DW1) N contents in the present study are similar to the mairimai values reported by
Chopin et al. (1 996) for A. nodanm fkom a nearby site at Maces Bay (26.7 mg N g
DW1 for apical tips, 12.4 mg N g DW' for mid-sections), while minimai values (17 mg
N g DW' for apical tips, 12.5 mg N g DW' for mid-sections) are higher (7.4 mg N g
DW' for apical parts, 7.6 mg N g DW-' for mid-sections). This cannot be explained by
49
seawater DIN experienced by the plants, the maximal levels of which were the same (10
&l) and the minimal level was oniy slightly higher at Letite (2.5 than at Maces Bay
(2
Mid-sections and cut tips had the lowest N contents and no seasonai variation.
Similady, Chopin et a& (1996) found the greatest seasonal variation in tissue total N
content in the youngest parts of A. nodosim, and consistentiy less variation in successively
older parts. Both of these studies suggest less physiological activity in older tissues, as
has been observeci in the rates of several physiological processes. In Fucus qiralis, N
uptake was lower in stipes than in growing tips (Topinka 1978), and nitrate reductase
acîivity in Fucus gardhen' was lowest in the stipe (Hurd et al. 1995). Young tissues of F.
gmherr' (as &chus) take up both MI,' and N O , but older fionds and stipes can only
take up Nb+ (Thomas er al. 1985). Kailov (1976) demonstrated higher photosynthetic
fixation of CO, in the younger tissues of A. nodosum relative to mature tissues.
The high N content of basal shoots rnay be due to theû high surface a r a : volume
(SAY) ratio relative to adult plants. In general, fhely branched and monostromatic
species tend to have higher nutrient uptake rates than coarse, thicker plants (Lobban and
Hamson 1994). This should also hold tme for morphologicdy dinerent Me stages of one
species. Alternatively, the low irradiance experienced by basal shoots under the addt
canopy may enhance nitrate uptake. In U1La ficiara, nitrate uptake was, in part,
invedy proportional to irradiance, leading to higher chlorophyll a and N content in low
light, outdoor cultures (Lapointe and Tenore 198 1). Similady, low light induced higher N
content in PuImariapZmata than in samples under high Iight with the sarne nitrate supply
(Morgan and Simpson 198 1 ).
Phosphorus
Phosphorus content of apical tips were high in winter and decreased in spring, as
has been observed in A. nodosum (Chopin et al. 1996) and other seaweeds (Kornfieldt
1982, Chopin et al. 1990, Delgado et al. 1994). As was seen for N, the late summer
peaks in seawater DIP were not reflected in tissue total P content. This may be because at
this t h e of year, dl P uptake is used for growth and does not accumulate.
The ranges of P content of apical tips (1.72 to 2.68 mg P g DW1) and mid-
sections (1.42 to 1.83 mg P g DW3 were comparable to those found for A. nodostlm in
a previous study (1.4 to 3.2 and 0.90 to 1.36 mg P g DWL , respectively; Chopin et ai.
1996) and for whole plants (1 to 1.5 mg P g DWL; Jensen (1960) in Moen et al. 1997).
Other authors have determined similar P contents for Fucus Mrsoides (1.8 to 2.7 mg P g
DW1; Zavodnik 1973), Macrocystispynfera ((1.5 to 3.3 mg P g DW'; Manley and
North 1984), and Cladphura sp. (0.8 to 3.0 mg P g DW1 ; Gordon et al. 198 1).
Phosphorus content ofA. nodosum was always higher in apical portions than in
mid-sections and more seasonally variable, as has been demonstrated for Fucus sematus L.
(Komfeldt 1982) and Chondns cripus (Chopin et QI. 1990). By contrast, in Cystoseira
meditmanea, tissue P contents in stipes (0.07 to 0.28 % ash-fiee DW) and holdfasts
(0.08 to 0.34 % ash-fiee DW) were the same as in growing parts (0.04 to 0.29 % ash-fiee
DW ; Delgado et al. 1994). This is likely due to the redistniution of P âom the perennial
lower shoots of C. mecli'femanea to the annual blades.
Phosphorus content of mid-sections and eut tips showed negligible seasonal
variations, as did the P content of base sections of F. serratus (Komfieldt 1982),
C h o h s m * p s (Chopin et al. 1990), and stipes of Cystoseira meditewanea, for which
seasonal variations were two-fold greater for P than for N (Delgado et al. 1994). As was
concluded for N, it seems that limited seasonal variations refied low physiological activity
and growth. Uptake of P (as phosphate) in Macrocy~nspyn~era was highest in youngest
blades and inversely proportional to tissue P content (Manley unpubl.). In addition,
translocation of P f?om mature, non-growing parts to Young, growing parts has been
observed dong the thallus in Laminariales and via the midrib in Fucales (Floc'h 1982),
although the mechanism, and form of P (inorganic or organic) translocated remain to be
fûUy elucidated (Lobban and Harrison 1994). These two phenornena (higher uptake in
tips and translocation fiom older parts) may contribute to the relatively high P contents
found in growing tips in this study.
As was suggested for N, the high tissue P contents in basal shoots (2.24 to 3.09
mg P g DUT? may be simply due to their high S A Y ratio which would enhance P uptake
relative to the rest of the plant (Hurd and Dring 1990, Lobban and Harrison 1994). For
seaweeds with higher SA:V ratios, reported tissue P contents are higher than for adult
shoots of A. nodosurm in this study: 2.1 to 5.1 mg P g DW-' for Uhafenestrafa and 3 .O
to 5.6 mg P g D w L for Enteromorph intestrna2is (Bjomsiiter and Wheeler 1990).
Carbon
Carbon content for aii parts of A. ndosum showed typicdy low seasonal variation
(Hardwick-W~tman and Mathieson 1986, Delgado et al. 1994, Giilanders and Brown
1994). Aîthough C content accounts for much of the structural tissue which would not be
expected to Vary much seasondy, there are several other organic compounds in A.
n d m m (alginate, mannitol, taminaran and fbcoidan) which vaq seasondy (Baardseth
1970). In Xphophorr ggladata, a large fùcoid, seasonal variation of mannitol is
signincant and most pronounced in the youngest tissues, with mannitol content being
highest in surnmer (Gillanders and Brown 1994). Mannitol and laminaran accumulate in
N-limited h i n a r u longicruriis in summer when photosynthetic rate is high, and are
consumed for growth in winter (Gagné et al. 1982). One would expect to observe sunilas
trends and correspondhg variations in C content in A. nodanm. Despite some small scale
variations, no broad seasonai trend was apparent for any part ofA. n4dusum in this study.
The steady increase in C content in apical tips throughout the study period may reflect a
longer term trend or inter-annual variation.
Nutrien t h i tation
From the results of this experiment, it is not possible to determine ifany of the
tissue parts sarnpled expenenced either N or P limitation during the sampling period.
Authon have used several methods for attempting to determine the occurrence, timing
and severity of nument limitation Increased growth rates due to N enrichment in field
populations (Chapman and Craigie 1 977, Lapointe 1 987) and in l aboratory studies
53
(Topinka and Robbim 1976, Lapointe and Ryther 1979, Hanisak 1979, Gordon et aL
1981, Fujita et al. 1989) have been cited as evidence of nutrient limitation. A deaease in
tissue total N content and growth afker seawater N concentrations drop in spring has aiso
been interpreted as evidence of N limitation (Chapman and Craigie 1977, Wheeler and
BjBmsater 1992). In the present study, there was a drop in seawater P and N levels in
spring, and a subsequent drop in tissue N and P in apical tips. Although this is consistent
with the estabfished pattern of the onset of nutrient limitation in summer, growth was not
measured, hence no conclusion can be made about the impact of the decrease in tissue N
and P contents.
A more direct method used to study nutrient limitation is the detennination of a
species' critical nutrient content, dehed by Hanisak (1983) as the internai n u k t content
that just limits its maximal growth. The cnticai N content has been determined for several
species (Table 11). There is, however, no reported critical nutrient content for A.
nodomm. In apical tips of A. nodumnz, N content ranged from 16.96 to 26.67 mg N g
W . The cntical N content of Pelvetiopns limitata, another fucoid aiga fiom the Pacific
Ocean, was 12 to 15 mg N g DW1, inferred fiom NP ratios (Fujita et al. 1989, Wheeler
and Bjomsater 1992). If these two algae are simüar, this suggests that apical tips of A.
nodosum were never N lunited during the sampling period of the present study. However,
critical N content varies among species and depends on the form of N used for growth
@#ta et al. 1989). RFcophyllum nodosum and P. limitata m e r greatiy in size, ecology,
and distribution, within the intertidd zone and geographically. In addition, critical
nutrient contents are reported for entire plants, but these could be expected to vary
Table 11: Critical nitrogen contents for several seaweeds.
Nutrient Critical content Authors (mg N. g DW1)
-
Chordcuiu jrogell~ormis NH,* ISmgN*gDW1 Probyn and Chapman 1983 (O. F. MûiIer) C. Agardh
NO; 9mgN*gDW1
Cfadophora aibida (Nets) Kntvng
Codium m i l e spp. tornentosoides (van Goor) P.C. Silva
Laminaria saccharina L. Lamour.
Pelvetiopsis limitata (Setcheu) Gardner
Uha rigida C. Agardh
N
NO;
NOi
NOi
NH,'
NO,'
w
Gordon et al. 1981
Hanisak 1983
Chpman et al. 1978
Fujita et al. 1989
Fujita et al. 1989
spatidy in morphologicaiiy complex seaweeds, as do tissue nutrients (Gillanders and
Brown 1994, Chopin et al. 1996, present study) and physiological aaivity (Topinka and
Robbins 1976, Hurd et ai. 1995). Although the nutient status of the whole plants is
relevant ecologidy, it is worth considering that criticai nutrient contents are probabiy
most reflective of the demand of growing tissues.
55
From batch culture experiments with two Pacific green algae, Enteromorph
intesfisfimZis and ndva fenestruta, BjBrnsater and Wheeier (1990) determined that the NP
ratio was a useful indicator of the nutritionai status of macroaigae. In a firrther study of
tissue N and P of five intertidal seaweeds, measured in silu, Wheeler and Bj6rnsater
(1992) proposed N P thresholds to delineate N and P limitations. A N P ratio greater than
17 * 6 was considered indicative of P limitation, whereas a N:P ratio less than 12 * 4 was
considered indicative of N limitation. Based on these thresholds, N:P ratios indicate that
none of the tissue parts of A. naiosum analysed experienced N limitation at any t h e
during this study, al1 tissues expenenced P limitation at some tirne, and apical tips were
always P limited. This is contrary to the studies of Chopin et al. (1995) and Wddish et al.
(1993) which demonstrated that N limitation occurred in C. crispus and phytoplankton in
the Bay of Fundy, but P limitation was unlikely.
This apparent discrepancy may be attributable to geographic diEerences. Nitrogen
limitation may be more likely in the Bay of Fundy than in the northeast Pacific due to
relatively lower N concentrations in the former compared to the latter where the study of
Wheeler and BjBmsater (1992) was conducted. At the site of the present study, DIN and
DIP concentrations ranged fiom 2.5 to 10.0 &l and fhrn 0.54 to 1-73 respectively.
Seaweeds used by WheeIer and Bjomsiiter (1992) were collected in November fiom
seawater with DTN and DIP concentrations of 10 to 15 pM and 0.8 PM, respectively.
Alt ematively, the apparent contradiction may be due to interspecific Werences,
regardless of arnbient nutrients. Without knowing the criticd nutrient contents ofA.
nodch~n and studying the relationship between nutrient supply and NT ratio in culture,
specuiation about nutrient limitation based solely on N:P ratios is risky.
For the purpose of this study, C:N ratios are no more informative than the N data
considered alone. The C:N ratios of A. nodomm mainly refiected the variability of N
contents in relation to the relatively constant C contents. For whole plants of A. nOLtOsum
fiom a New England estuary, C:N ratios showed a similar range (1 3.8 to 26.1) and also
refiected seasonal variation in N contents, against relatively constant C contents
(Hardwick-Witman and Mathieson 1 986). The C:N ratio for Cystoseira medtemanea
(Delgado et al. 1994) showed limited seasonal variations, in a range sirnilar to that ofA.
nodomm in the above study. The C:N ratios fiom ai i of these studies are within the range
determined by Atkinson and Smith (1983) for a wide range of macrophytes (6.6 to 60)
which is signincantly higher than the typical RecEeld C:N ratio of phytoplankton (7). This
reflects the high content of structural C in seaweeds and suggests that seaweeds have
lower nutrient requirements to support growth relative to phytoplankton (Atkinson and
Smith 1983).
Impact of harvesting
The nutrient physiology of cut tips is very different ffom that of apical tips because
afler tnincation of a shoot, growth is by Iateral branches (Moss 1970, Lazo and Chapman
1996). Among the tagged shunps in this study, some had new laterals arigng near the cut,
but there was never any regrowth diedy fiom the primary shoot. One year after
harveszing, stumps were still easily identifiable as having been cut by a rake (Fig. 13).
Regrowth, ifany, was observed always &om fateral branches near the cut tip.
Figure 13 : (A) Stump showing cut tips (Cl, CZ, C3) and lateral shoots (LI, L2, L3) one month d e r tnincation due to harvesting (September 1996). (B) The same shunp 11 months after harvesting (Juiy 1997), showing no change in cut tips (Cl, C2, C3) and powth of lateral shoots (LI, L2, L3) below cut tips.
Vigorous regrowth of basal shoots after harvesting has been observed by several authors
(Keser and Larson 1984, Cousens 1985, Sharp 1987, Lazo and Chapman 1 996), and is
believed to be due to increased irradiance after canopy removal (Cousens 1985). In the
present study, it would be expected that basal shoots of harvested plots, once relieved of
light Iimitation, would grow rapidly and show significant dEerences in nutrient contents
fiom those of basal shoots under intact canopies (control plots). However, there was
essentiaily no dserence in nutrient contents between basal shoots ftom control and
hawested plots, except for a few months.
There are three possible explanations for this similarity. First, the hawesting at
the study site may not have been intense enough to significantly alter the canopy, and
therefore the irradiance experienced by basal shoots. Harvesting intensity in this study
(17 %) was lower than in those of Sharp (1987; 60 %), Ang et al. (1993; 80 %) and Lazo
and Chapman (1996; c a 18 %, 60 %, and 70 %). In the harvesting study of Keser et al.
(198 l), all plants within 25 x 25 cm quadrats were cut at the holdfast or heights of 15 cm
or 25 cm, therefore removing a greater percentage of the biomass than was removed in the
present study. Secondly, measurements of nutrient content may not be sufncientiy
sensitive to detect Merences in the physiology of basal shoots. The high nutrient content
of basal shoots, relative to other parts, suggests that they were not nutrient timited. Other
variables, such as light, could be the lllniting primary factor. Peckol et a% (1988)
concluded that the rarity of subtidal populations of A. nodosum was due primarily to light
limitation. niirdly, some of the basal shoots rnay have been growing so rapidiy that they
59
were excluded âom sampling because they were too long. Ody basal shoots which were
less than 10 cm and had no vesicle throughout the study period were sampled, and growth
was not measured. Fast growing shoots, which account for the regrowth observed in
Lazo and Chaprnan (1996), would not have been sampled once they no longer fit our
definition of a basal shoot,
Conclusion
From d of the parameters considered, it is clear that &er truncation, remaining
parts of the stumps show nutnent physiology more simiiar to that of mid-sections of intact
shoots than to apical tips. This is consistent with the observation that regrowth on stumps
was dways fiom laterd shoots below nit tips, and never from a new apical meristem at
the point of truncation. There is no apparent difference in the nutrient contents and ratios
between basal shoots sampled fkom under intact and harvested canopies.
Future studies
This study has focussed oniy on nutrient contents, and the ratios derived nom
them, but has not attempted to determine why the distribution of nutrients is not unifom
across the plant. It would be interesting to study the rates of nutrient uptake and
incorporation, storage and translocation in the parts ofA. nOLii3sunt studied in this project.
In addition, the regrowth of lateral shoots should be measured after hawesting, as this has
important implications for the morphology of harvested plants, and perhaps for character
of entire stands of harvested A. nodosum.
60
LITERATURE CITED
&erg, P. 1996. Pattern of reproductive S o r t in the brown aiga Ascop~IZum nodosum.
Mar. EcoL Prog. Ser. 138: 199-207.
Ang, P.O., Sharp, G.J. and Semple, RE. 1993. Changes in the population structure of
AscophyIIum noddnm (L.) Le Jolis due to mechanicd harvesting. Hyciobiol.
260/261: 32 1-326.
Asare, S.O. and Harlin, M. M. 1983. Seasonal fluctuations in tissue nitrogen for five
species of perennial macroalgae in Rhode Island Sound. J. Phycol. 19: 254-257.
Atkinson, M. J. and Smith, S. V. 1983. C:N:P ratios o f benthic marine plants. LimnoZ'
Oceanogr. 28: 568-74.
Baardseth, E. 1970. Synopsis of biological data on knobbed wrack AscophyIIum nodom
(Linnaeus) Le Jolis. FA0 Fish Synop. 38 Rev. 1 : 41 pp.
Bacon, L. C. and Vadas, R L. 1991. A mode1 for gamete release in Ascophyllum
nodosurn (Phaeophyîa). J. Phycol. 27: 166- 173.
Bjomsiiter, B. R and Wheeler, P. A 1990. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus supply on
growth and tissue composition of lllva fenestrafa and Enteromopha intestinaZis
(Uvales, Chlorophyta). J. PhycoL 26: 603-6 1 1.
Blunden, G., Rogers, D.J. and Famham, WP. 1975. Survey of British seaweeds for
hemaggiutinins. LIoydia 38: 16% 168.
Boney, AD. 1965. Aspects of the biology of the seaweeds of economic importance. A h .
MW. &OZ. 3: 105-253,
Cardinal, A and Lesage, V. 1992. Répartition des épiphytes Pil&lla littorallis (L.)
61
Kjeh. et Pofysiphonia lmosa (L.) Tandy sur Ascophyllum nodohnmr (L.) Le Jolis
en baie de Fundy (NB Canada). Cah. Biol. Mm. 33: 125-135.
Chapman, ARO. and Craigie, J.S. 1977. Seasonal growth in Laminana longicniris:
relations with dissolved inorganic nutrients and interna1 reserves of nitrogen. Mm.
B i d 40: 197- 205.
Chapman, A R O., Maricham, J. W. and Lüning, K. 1978. Effects of nitrate
concentration on the growth and physiology of hinmia sacchmm
(Phaeophyta) in culture. J. Phycol. 14: 195-98.
Chock, J.S. and Mathieson, A.C. 1983. Variations of New England seaweed biomass.
Bot. MW. 26: 87-97.
Chopin, T. 1998. The Seaweed Resources of Eastern Canada. In: Critchley, A T. and
Ohno, M. (eds.), Seaweed Resources of the World. Japanese International Co-
operation Agency, Yokosuka: 273-3 02.
Chopin, T., Gdant, T. and Davison, 1. 1995. Phosphonis and nitrogen nutrition in
Chonhs crispus (Rhodophyta): effects on total phosphorus and nitrogen content,
carrageenan production, and photosynthetic pigments and metabolism. J. Phycol.
31: 283-93.
Chopin, T., Le- H. and Haicrow, K. 1997. Polyphosphates in the red rnacroalga
Chonabus mispus (Rhodophyceae). New Phytol. 135: 587-594.
Chopin, T., Marcpis, P.A. and Belyea, E9. 1996. Seasonal dynamics of phosphorus and
nitrogen content in the brown alga AscophylZm nodomm (L.) Le Jolis, and its
associated species PoZysiphonia lanosa @.) Tandy and PiZuyeZIa Zittoralis (L.)
62
Kjehan, âom the Bay of Fundy, Canada. Bot. Mar. 39 : 543-552.
Chopin, T., Houmant, A, Flocph, J.-Y. and Penot, M. 1990. Seasonal variation of growth
in the red alga Chondrus crispus on the Atlantic French coasts. 11. Relations with
phosphorus concentrations in seawater and intemal phosphorylated hctions. Cm
J. Bot. 68: 5 12-5 17,
Cody, R. P. and Smith, J. K. 1991. Applied Statistics und the SAP Programming
k g p a g e . Third Edilon. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 403 pp.
Cousens, R. 198 1. Population ecology of Ascophyllm n o d o m (L.) Le JOBS. PhD.
thesis, Daihousie University, Halifax, NS. 273 pp.
Cousens, R 1984. Estimation of annual production by the intertidd brown alga
AscophyIZum nodosum (L.) Le Jolis. Bot Mar. 27: 217-227.
Cousens, R 1985. Frond size distributions and the effects of the algal canopy on the
behaviour of AscophyZIum noùosum (L.) Le Jolis. J; Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecof. 92:
23 1-49.
David, H. M. 1943. Studies in the autecology of Ascophyhm n0Ci;osirm Le Jol. J EcoL
31 : 178-198.
Davison, 1. R, Andrews, M. and Stewart, WD.P. 1984. Regdations o f growth in
Lumima digiata : use of in-vivo nitrate reductase activities as an indicator of
nitrogen limitation in field populations of h i m a spp. Mm. BioL 84: 207-217.
Delgado, O. E., Bdestros, E. and Vidal, M. 1994. Seasonal variation in tissue nitrogen
and phosphoms of Cystoseim medterranea Sauvageau (Fucales, Phaeophyceae)
in the northwest Mediterranean Sea. Bot. Mm. 37: 1-9.
63
Floc'h, J.-Y. 1982. Uptake of Uiorganic ions and their long distance transport in Fucales
and Laminanales. In: L. M. Srivastava (ed.), Synhetic andDegradrrtr've Processes
in Mmhe Mucroplzytes. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin: 13 9-65.
Fujita, R M., Wheeler, P. A and Edwards, R. L. 1989. Assessrnent of macroalgal
nitrogen limitation in a seasonal upwehg region. Mm. EcoL Prog. Ser. 53: 293-
303.
Gagnd, J. A., Mann, K. H. and Chapman, A. R 0. 1982. Seasonal patterns of growth
and st orage in Laminma longicruris in relation to differing patterns of availability
ofnitrogen in the water. Mm Biol. 69: 91-101.
Giilanders, B.M. and Brown, M.T. 1994. The chernical composition of Xiphophora
gldiata (Phaeophyceae: Fucales): seasonal and within plant variation. Bot. Mm.
37: 483490.
Gordon, D. M., Birch, P. B. and McComb, A. J. 1 98 1. Effects o f inorganic phosphorus
and nitrogen on the growth of an estuarine CIOCii3phora in culture. Bot. Mar. 24:
93-106.
Grasshoff, K., Ehrhardt, M. and Kremlin& K. 1983. Methodr of Semater Ana&sis.
Verlag Chernie, Weinheim. 419 pp.
Hanisaiq M. D. 1979. Growth pattems of Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoicies in response
to temperature, irradiance, salinity, and nitrogen source. M m Biol. JO: 3 19-332.
Hanisak, M. D. 1983. The nitrogen relationships of marine macroalgae. In: E. J.
Carpenter and D. G. Capone (eds.), Nitrogen in the Marine Environment.
Academic Press, New York: 699-730.
64
Hardwick-Wttman, M. N. and Mathieson, A C. 1986. Tissue nitrogen and carbon
variations in New England estuarine Ascophylhm nodosum (L.) Le Jolis
populations (Fucales, Phaeophyta). &tudes 9: 43 -48.
Hurd, C. L. and Dring, M. J. 1990. Phosphate uptake by intertidal algae in relation to
zonation and season. Mm. Biol. 107: 28 1-289.
Hurd, C. L., Berges, J. A, Osborne, J. and Hanison, P. J. 1995. An in vitro nitrate
reductase assay for marine macroalgae: opthkation and characterization of the
enzyme for Fucus g d e r i (Phaeophyta). J. Phycol. 31: 83 5-843.
Josselyn, M. N. and Mathieson, A C. 1978. Contribution of the receptacles fiom the
fùcoid Ascophylum nodosum to the detrital pool of a north temperate estuary.
EstumCIIIes 1: 258-261.
Kailov, K. M. 1976. Physiological heterogeneity of thallus elements in Ascophyllm
nodomm, Fucus vesimZosus and Fucus infatus ftom the Barents Sea. Soviet Plant
P hysiol. (English transl. Fin01 Rast .) 23: 703 -707.
Keser, M. and Larson, B. R 1984. Colonization and growth of Ascop~IZum nodosum
(Phaeophyta) in Maine. J. Phycol. 200: 83-87.
Keser, M., Vadas, R L. and Larson, B. R 1981. Regrowth ofAscophyIIum no&= and
Fucus vesimZusus under various harvesting regimes in Maine, U.S.A. Bot. Mm.
24: 29-38.
KNght, M and Parke, M. 1950. A biological study of Fucus vesiçuIosus L. and F.
serrdus L. J, Mm- Biol. Assoc. UK. 29: 43 9-5 14.
Konifed?, R-A 1982. Relations between nitrogen and phosphorus content of macroalgae
and the waters of Northem Oresund. Bot Mar. 255: 197-20 1.
Lapointe, B. E. 1 987. Phosphorus- and nitrogen-limited phot osynthesis and growth of
Gracilmù tikvahiae (Rhodophyceae) in the Flonda Keys: sn experimental field
study. Mar. Biol. 93: 561-568.
Lapointe, B. E. and Ryther, J. H. 1979. The effects of nitrogen and seawater flow rate on
the growth and biochemicai composition of GracilanP foliifeta v. anwm*ma in
mass outdoor cultures. Bot. Mm. 22: 529-537.
Lapointe, B. E, and Tenore, K. R 1981. Experhental outdoor studies with Uva faciata
Delile. 1. Interaction of iight and nitrogen on nutrient uptake, growth and
biochemicai composition. J Eip. Mm. B a . Ecol. 53: 135-1 52.
Lazo, L. and Chapman, A.R.O. 1996. Effects of harvesting on AscophyZlum nodosum
(L.) Le Jolis (Fucales, Phaeophyta) : a demographic approach. A Appl. PhycoL 8:
87-103.
Lining, T. and Garbary, D. J. 1992. The Ascophyllum/Po&siphonia/lMyco~herella
symbiosis. III. Experimental studies on the interaction between P. Zànosa and
A. nodom. Bot. MW. 35: 341-349.
Lobban, C. S. and Hamison, P. J. 1994. Seaweed Ecoiogy a d Physiology. Cambridge
University Press Cambridge. 366 pp.
Lubchenco, J. 1978. Plant species diversity in a marine intertidal community: importance
of herbivore food preference and algd cornpetitive abilities. Amer. Nd. 112: 23-
39.
MacFarlane, C. 1932. Observations on the annuai growth of AscophylIm ndsrrm.
Proc. ïhm. Nova scotim Itrst. Sci. : 27-32.
MacPherson, MG. and Y o u a E.G. 1952. Sessonal variation in the chernical
composition of the Fzicaceae in the Maritime Provinces. C m J. Bot. 30: 67-77.
Manley, S. L. and North, W. J. 1984. Phosphoms and the growth of juvenile Mawocystrs
pyrijiera (Phaeophyta) sporophytes. J. Phycol. 20: 3 89-393.
Mathieson, A C., Pennirnan, C.A., Pauia, K.B. and Tveter-Gallagher, E. 1982. Effixts of
ice on AscophyJZum nodomm within the Great Bay estuary system of New
Hampshire-Maine. L Phycol. 18: 33 1-336.
Mathieson, k C., Shipman, J. W., O' Shea, J. R. and Hasevlat, R. C. 1976. Seasonal
growth and reproduction of estuarine fucoid dgae in New England. J. Exp. Mm.
Biol. Ecol. 25: 273-284.
McCook, L. J. and Chapman, ARO. 1993. Community succession folowing massive ice-
scour on a rocky intertidal shore: recmitment, cornpetition and predation during
early, primary succession. Mar. B i d 115: 565-575.
Moen, E., Hom, S. and astgaard, K. 1997. Biological degradation of Ascophyhm
nodosum. J. Appl. Phycol. 9: 347-3 57.
Morgan, K. C. and Simpson, F. J. 198 1. Cultivation of Pairnuria (Rhodpennia) pimuta :
effea of high concentration of nitrate and ammonium on growth and nitrogen
uptake. A p a Bot 11: 167-171.
Moss, B. 1970. Meristems and growth control in Ascophyllm n&mm (L.) Le Jol. New
Phytol. 69: 253-260.
67
Murphy, J. and Riley, J. P. 1962. A modified single solution approach for the
determination of phosphate in naturd water. A d Chim. Acta 27: 3 1-36.
Nishide, E., Anzai, H. and Uchida, N. 1993. Effects of alginates on the ingestion and
excretion of cholesterol in the rat. J. Appl. Ph&'. 5: 207-2 1 1.
Papenfiiss, G. F. 1950. Review of the genera of algae descnbed by Stackhouse.
Hyriiobiol. 2: 18 1-207.
Patier, P., Yvin, J.C. , Kloareg, B., Lienart, Y. and Rochas, C.1993. Seaweed liquid
fertilizer fiom Ascophyllm nodosum contains elicitors of plant D-giycanases. J.
Appl. PPhyc* 5: 343-349.
Peckol, P., Harlin, M. M. and Knimscheid, P. 1988. Physiological and population ecology
of intertidal and subtidai AscophyiZuum nodomm (Phaeophyta). J. Phycol. 24: 192-
198.
Probyn, T. A. and Chapman, A R 0. 1983. Surnmer growth rate of Chordmia
flagelllifmis (O. F. Muen.) C. Ag. : physiological strategies in a nutrient stressed
environment. J. Exp. Mm. Biol. Ecol. 73: 243-271.
Riou, D., Coliiec-Jouault, S., Pinczon Du Sel, D., Bôsch, S., Siavoshian, S., Le Bert, V.,
Tomasonî, C., Sinquin, C., Dutanci, P. and Roussakis, C. 1996. Antitumor and
antiproliEerative effects of a fiican extracteci fiom Ascop~lZum nodanm against a
non-smd-ce1 bronchopuimonary carcinoma line. Anticamer Resecach 16: 12 13-
1218.
SAS Institute hc. 1990. SAS Uistitute, Inc. Cary, NC.
Sharp, G. J. 198 1. An assessrnent of AscophyIIum nodosurn harvesting methods in
southwestern Nova Scotia. Cm* Tech. Rep. Fish. Apat Sci. 1012: 28 pp.
Sharp, G.I. 1987. AscophyJJuum n d s u m and its harvesting in eastem Canada. In: Doty,
M.S., Caddy, J. F. and Santelices, B. (eds.), Case study of seven commercial
seaweed resources. FA0 Tech. Pq. 281: 3-48.
Sharp, G. J. and Trernblay, D. M. 1985. A tagging technique for s m d macrophytes. Bot.
MW. 28: 549-55 1,
Sharp, G. J., Semple, R and Barkhouse, 1. 1997. Macro invertebrates associated with
AscophyIZm nodosum &.) Le Jolis canopy in the Guifof Maine and the impact of
harvesting on the canopy. In: G. T. Wallace and E. F. Braasch (eds.). P . . of
the Gulfof Maine Ecosystem Dynumics Scientific S'posium and Wurkshop.
RARGOM Report, 97- 1. Hanover, NH, Regional Association for Research on the
Gulf of Maine, 352 pp.
Sokal, R R and Rom, F. J. 1 905. Biornefry : the Principes and Pructice of Slaristis in
Biologicd Resemch. 3rd ed. W . H. Freeman and Company, New York, 887 pp.
South, G. R and Whittick, A 1987. Introduction to PhycoIogy. BlackweIi SQentific
Publications, Odord, 341 pp.
Sundene, 0. 1973. Growth and reproduction in AscophyIZum nodosun (Phaeophyceae).
NOM. J Bot. 20: 249-255.
Thomas, M. L. H., Arnold, D. C. and Taylor, A R A 1983. Rocky intertidal
cornrnunities. In: Thomas, M. L. K (ed.), M m e and coastd systems of the
@d& Region, N~ou Brunswick Cm. Spec. PPubl. Fish. Aput. Sci. 64: 35-73.
Thomas, TE., Harrison, P. J. and Taylor, E. B. 1985. Nitrogen uptake and growth of the
gennlings and mature thalli of Fu= disfichus. Mar. Bid. 84: 267-274.
Topinka, J. A 1978. Effects of nitrate and ammonium enhancement on growth and
nitrogen physiology in Fucus virafis (Phaeophyceae). J. Phycol. 12: 241-247.
Topinka, J. A and Robbins, J. V. 1976. Effects of nitrate and ammonium enhancernent on
growth and nitrogen physiology in Fucus spiraIis. Lhnol. Oceanogr. 21: 659-
664.
Vadas, R L. and Wright, W. A. 1986. Recruitment, growth and management of
Ascophyllum nodomm. In: R.H. Westermeier (ed.). Actm ll. Congr. A@ Mm.
Chilenar. Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia: 10 1 - 1 13.
Vadas, RL., Wright, W.A. and Miller S.L. 1990. Recmitment ofAscophylh nodosunt:
wave action as a source of mortaiity. Mm. Ecol. Pro8 Ser. 61: 263-272.
Waaland, J. R 198 1. Commercial utilîzation. In: C. S. Lobban and M. J. Wynne (eds.),
Ihe BioIogy of Seaweerls. Blackweil Scientific, Oxford, 786 pp.
Wheeler, P A and Bjomsater, B.R 1992. Seasonal fluctutations in tissue nitrogen,
phosphoms, and NP for five macroaigal species comrnon to the Pacific northwest
coast. J PhycoI. 28: 1-6.
Wheeler, P. A and North, W. J. 1980. Effect of nitrogen supply on the nitrogen content
and growth rate of juveniles ofMucroysfispyRfera (Phaeophyta) sporophytes. J.
PhycoI. 16: 577-582.
Wheeler, W. N. and Snvastava, L. M. 1984. Seasonal nitrate physiology ofMucrocysfts
integrifol Boy. J. Erp- MW. Biol. Ecol. 76: 35-50.
70
Wddish, D. J., Keizer, P. D., Wilson, A J. and Martin, J. L. 1993. Seasonal changes of
dissolved oxygen and plant nutrients in seawater near sahonid net pens in the
macrotidai Bay of Fundy. Cm* J . Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50: 303-3 1 1.
Zavodnik, N. 1973. Seasonal variations in rate of photosynthetic activity and chernical
composition of the littoral seaweeds common to North Adriatic. 1. Fucus
virsoides (Don.) J. Ag. Bot. Mm. 26: 1 55- 165.
Recommended