View
42
Download
1
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Healthy Life Years (HLY) at age 65 in the European Union using the SILC 2005 The EHEMU Team www.ehemu.eu. Data and Methods. Life tables 2005 (provisional) Age specific prevalence of activity limitation from Eurostat (weighted) Estimation of HLY and 95% CI, using Sullivan method - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Healthy Life Years (HLY) at age 65 in the European Union
using the SILC 2005
The EHEMU Teamwww.ehemu.eu
Data and Methods
• Life tables 2005 (provisional)
• Age specific prevalence of activity limitation from Eurostat (weighted)
• Estimation of HLY and 95% CI, using Sullivan method
• Difference between EHEMU and Eurostat values• At age 65 max absolute difference 0.59 yrs men and
0.35 yrs women
Raw prevalence data
Prevalence of activity limitation for men by age
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
16 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
age
prevalence
Austria
Belgium
Cyprus
CzechRepublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
UnitedKingdom
sex 1
With activity limitations
age
country
Denmark
Prevalence of activity limitation for women by age
Denmark
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
16 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
age
prevalence
Austria
Belgium
Cyprus
CzechRepublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
UnitedKingdom
sex 2
With activity limitations
age
country
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
16 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
age
prevalence
Austria
Belgium
Cyprus
CzechRepublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
UnitedKingdom
sex 1
Strongly limited
age
country
Prevalence of severe activity limitation for men by age
Denmark missing
Prevalence of severe activity limitation for women by age
Denmark missing
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
16 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
age
prevalence
Austria
Belgium
Cyprus
CzechRepublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
UnitedKingdom
sex 2
Strongly limited
age
country
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
16 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Austria
Belgium
Cyprus
CzechRepublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
UnitedKingdom
sex 1
chronic_yes
age
country
Prevalence of chronic morbidity for men by age
Prevalence of chronic morbidity for women by age
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
16 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Austria
Belgium
Cyprus
CzechRepublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
UnitedKingdom
sex 2
chronic_yes
age
country
Prevalence of good perceived health for men by age
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
16 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Austria
Belgium
Cyprus
CzechRepublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
UnitedKingdom
sex 1
With good perceived health
age
country
Prevalence of good perceived health for women by age
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
16 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Austria
Belgium
Cyprus
CzechRepublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
UnitedKingdom
sex 2
With good perceived health
age
country
Prevalence of poor perceived health for men by age
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
16 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Austria
Belgium
Cyprus
CzechRepublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
UnitedKingdom
sex 1
Poor perceived health
age
country
Prevalence of poor perceived health for women by age
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
16 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85
Austria
Belgium
Cyprus
CzechRepublic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
UnitedKingdom
sex 2
Poor perceived health
age
country
Healthy Life Year Results
Distribution of LE and HLY EU25, 2005
LE at age 65 men and women
Correlation = 0.85 Men range 4.9 years
Women range = 4.3 years
LE and HLY at age 65 men
Correlation = 0.67 LE range 4.9 years HLY range = 9.7 years
LE and HLY at age 65 women
Correlation = 0.47 LE range 4.3 years HLY range = 10.6 years
HLY at age 65 2005
HLY at age 65 2005
HLY% at age 65 2005
HLY% at age 65 2005
HLY % at age 65 men and women
Correlation = 0.97 Men range 81% - 26% Women range = 74% - 19%
Moderate and severe AL years at age 65 men
Correlation = -0.11Moderate range 2.6-8.6
Severe range = 0-5.3
Moderate and severe AL years at age 65 women
Correlation = -0.38Moderate range 3.2-12.9
Severe range = 0-7.9
2) Life expectancy:2) Variations in LE at age 65 of 4.9 years for men and 4.3 for
women
Conclusions
3) HLY and HLY% at age 65• Greater variation than in LE – 9.7 years for men and 10.6 for
women• HLY% varies by 55% in men and women• Countries with high years in moderate AL are not necessarily
high in severe AL
4) Gender differences at age 65• High correlation between LE, HLY and HLY% at age 65
between men and women
1) Prevalence data from SILC 2005:• In general coherent apart from activity limitation in Denmark
Next steps
• Sensitivity checks– Life expectancy assumptions– Institutionalised population
Healthy Life Years (HLY) at age 65 in the European Union
using the SILC 2005
Recommended