Hazard Management Effectiveness & Measurement - · PDF fileHazard Management Effectiveness...

1

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Hazard Management Effectiveness & Measurement

Drillsafe MeetingPerth 25th March, 2004Paul Young

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Hazard Management

• Variety of Hazard Management Tools• A Means to Measure• Assessment and Continuous improvement• Knowledge Sharing Ability

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Schlumberger Hazard Analysis Tools

Tas

k

I

NC

RE

AS

ING

CO

MP

LE

XIT

Y

P

roce

ss

QRA

PRIAM HAZID/HAZOP

HARC Record Form (Design & Planning)

HARC Record Form (Worksite Operations)

JSA (QHSE) Form

THA Prompt Card

Stand Back 5x5

STOP, Commentary Drive SIPP Observation, Unsafe Act Audit

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Measuring Effectiveness

• Statistics– Trend Analysis– Performance Against Objectives (Score Cards)

• Participation– Reporting Rates– Passport

• Audits and Assessments– Scores– Remedial Action Closure.

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Measuring Effectiveness

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Measuring Effectiveness

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Hazard Management – Risk Profile

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Measuring Effectiveness -Scorecards

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Measuring Effectiveness

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Participation – Passport Review

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Continuous Improvement

• Accountability• Behavioural Observations• Evolution of the HARC• Knowledge Management.

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

JSA – Instilling Accountability

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Behavioural Observations

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

FOCUS AREA

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Evolution of the HARC

• Hazard Analysis & Risk Control– Refining the JSA to ensure ALARP before

proceeding– A Hazard Management Tool for tasks of

significant risk.

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

HARC Workflow

Assess Likelihood of each undesired event

Assess Potential Severity of each undesired event

Place analyses on OFS Risk Assessment Matrix.

Is it acceptable?

Risk reduction with improved Prevention

Risk reduction with improved Mitigation

Document in HARC form, agree review cycle,

proceed

No

Yes

Identify all hazards associated with planned

activities

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

HARC

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Risk Assessment

SE

VE

RIT

Y

-11L

-21S

-41C

-31M

-51 M C

-22L

-41S

-62M

-82C

-102MC

-33L

-63S

-93M

-123C

-153MC

-44L

-55L

-84S

-124M

-164C

-204MC

-105S

-155M

-205C

-255 M C

-1Light

-2

-3

-4

-5

Serious

Major

Catastrophic

Multi-Catastrophic

321

Possible

Unlikely

Improbable

5

Probable

4

Likely

LIKELIHOOD

White arrow indicates decreasing r isk

R E D

BLUE

YELLOW

GREEN

INTOLERABLE: Do not take this r isk

UNDESIRABLE: Demonstrate ALARP before proceeding

ACCEPTABLE: Proceed careful ly, with continuous improvement

NEGLIGIBLE: Safe to proceed

-16 to -10

-9 to -5

-4 to -2

-1

BLACK NON-OPERABLE: Evacuate the zone and or area/country-25 to -20

Negligible Safe to proceed

Acceptable Proceed carefully, with continuous improvement

Undesirable Demonstrate ALARP before proceedingIntolerable Do not take this RiskBlack Zone Non-Operable

Negligible Safe to proceed

Acceptable Proceed carefully, with continuous improvement

Undesirable Demonstrate ALARP before proceedingIntolerable Do not take this RiskBlack Zone Non-Operable

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Knowledge Management

• All HSE documentation controlled centrally• HARCS, Hazards & Alerts stored centrally• Employee Subscriptions to Knowledge

databases• Automatic email notification of alerts &

changes

Sch

lum

berg

er Private

Summary

•Successful Hazard Management depends on• having the right tools for the complexity and risk involved• a method to measure and assess effectiveness• continuous assessment improvement• an effective way to share identified hazards with all employees