View
215
Download
3
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Handbook
‘Inclusive spaces of learning’
This publication has been funded with support from the European
Commission.
It reflects the views only of the author,
and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may
be made of the information contained therein.
Page 2
Table of content 1. Introduction ...................................................................................... 5
2. Interviews with experts .................................................................. 17
3. Guidelines for inclusive spaces of learning ................................. 27
3.1. Before the training ...................................................................... 28
3.1.1. Target groups .................................................................... 28
3.1.2. Venue ................................................................................ 29
3.1.3. Arrival instructions ............................................................. 29
3.1.4. Accommodation ................................................................. 30
3.1.5. Application and announcements ........................................ 30
3.1.6. Support of participants ....................................................... 32
3.1.7. Trainers ............................................................................. 33
3.1.8. Schedule ........................................................................... 34
3.2. During the training ...................................................................... 34
3.2.1. Trainer couples .................................................................. 34
3.2.2. Training rules..................................................................... 34
3.2.3. Clear and understandable language .................................. 35
3.2.4. Additional time ................................................................... 36
3.2.5. Common characteristics .................................................... 36
3.2.6. Roles in the group ............................................................. 36
3.2.7. Overview ........................................................................... 37
3.2.8. Methods and instructions ................................................... 37
3.2.9. Interpreters and assistive tools .......................................... 45
3.2.10. Handouts ........................................................................... 46
3.3. After the training ......................................................................... 46
Page 3
4. Checklist for an accessible space of learning .............................. 48
4.1. Venue ......................................................................................... 48
4.1.1. General ............................................................................. 48
4.1.2. For people with learning difficulties .................................... 48
4.1.3. For people with limited mobility and wheelchair users ....... 49
4.1.4. For people with hearing impairment................................... 49
4.1.5. For people with visual impairment and blind people ......... 50
4.2. Communication with people with disabilities ............................... 50
4.2.1. General ............................................................................. 50
4.2.2. For people with hearing impairment................................... 51
4.2.3. For people with visual impairment or blind people ............. 51
4.3. Training ...................................................................................... 52
4.3.1. General ............................................................................. 52
4.3.2. For people with learning difficulties .................................... 52
4.3.3. For people with limited mobility and wheelchair users ....... 52
4.4. Training-material ........................................................................ 53
4.4.1. General ............................................................................. 53
4.4.2. For people with learning difficulties .................................... 53
4.4.3. For people with visual impairment or blind people ............. 53
5. Guidelines for creating accessible written materials for people
with learning difficulties ................................................................ 54
6. Evaluation Sheet ............................................................................ 57
7. Guidelines for an evaluation of inclusive spaces of learning.......... 63
8. Guidelines for setting up inclusive teams in work & training ......... 66
Page 4
9. Examples of good practice ............................................................ 74
9.1. Example: Multiplication Course .................................................. 75
9.2. Example: 4 types of listening ...................................................... 76
9.3. Example: Theory U ..................................................................... 78
10. Training material for Person Centred Planning ........................... 79
10.1. Example: Gaining confidence in my own skills as graphic
facilitator ..................................................................................... 80
10.1.1. Background ....................................................................... 80
10.1.2. Exercise ............................................................................ 80
10.2. Example: Reflect on the current situation and find out what
makes a good person centred review ......................................... 82
10.2.1. Background ....................................................................... 82
10.2.2. Group Exercise .................................................................. 84
10.3. Example: Module 1 of the Person Centred Planning course ....... 87
10.3.1. Exercise 1 ......................................................................... 88
10.3.2. Exercise 2 ......................................................................... 89
10.3.3. Exercise 3 ......................................................................... 90
10.3.4. Exercise 4 ......................................................................... 90
10.3.5. Exercise 5 ......................................................................... 92
10.3.6. Exercise 6 ......................................................................... 93
10.3.7. Exercise 7 ......................................................................... 94
10.3.8. Exercise 8 ......................................................................... 95
10.3.9. Exercise 9 ......................................................................... 96
10.3.10. Exercise 10 ....................................................................... 98
10.3.11. Exercise 11 ....................................................................... 99
10.3.12. Exercise 12 ..................................................................... 101
10.4. Example: PATH ........................................................................ 103
11. Dictionary ..................................................................................... 104
Page 5
1. Introduction
This handbook is 1 result of the ‘New Paths to InclUsion’ project.
If you want to know more about the project you can visit the website:
www.personcentredplanning.eu The content for this handbook has been put together
by the members of the New Paths to InclUsion project and other people.
You can see the members of the project on the website of the project.
This handbook was written by our project partner innovia.
innovia is an Austrian non-governmental organisation.
innovia has been working in the field of vocational trainings,
especially with and for people with disabilities and learning difficulties for
almost 10 years.
We also have received content and ideas from people who were not part
of our project.
These people also have experience working with Person Centred
Planning in inclusive spaces of learning.
1 of the persons who was not part of the project who supported us was
Lisa Wimmler.
She works as a trainer and facilitator of Person Centred Planning
courses in Austria.
Her input has influenced the guidelines for inclusive spaces of learning.
We want to thank her for this.
Many more people have contributed to our handbook.
As we cannot thank all the persons,
Lisa Wimmler serves as an example.
Thanks to everybody who has helped us to complete this handbook!
Page 6
We have tried to include self-advocates in the development
of the entire handbook.
For example self-advocates from the European Platform of Self-
Advocates (EPSA).
Some parts of the handbook have been developed
together with self-advocates.
Some parts were revised several times, with input from self-advocates.
Other parts were not revised by self-advocates.
Our project has not been the 1st project to think about how best to
include people with disabilities.
We and many other people around the world
have already made some progress.
But we are still on the way.
There needs to be much more development and practical examples.
In our project we have not been fully inclusive in all aspects and
stages in the project.
This was also made clear by self-advocates from EPSA.
They have given us very important feedback and ideas to think about.
We learnt:
To really work inclusive you have to plan extra time and
extra money from the beginning of a project.
The perfect situation would be to work with self-advocates
already in the preparation of the project.
Because self-advocates know best what works good for them and
what they need to be fully included.
Some of this learning will also be presented in this handbook and
some of this learning we will take on to future projects.
The New Paths to InclUsion project was realised from January 2013 to
December 2015.
In this time we had many discussions with and without self-advocates.
We learnt that talking about inclusive trainings is not enough for us.
Page 7
Learning does not only take place in formal training courses.
Every setting where people come together to work on a shared topic or
idea can be an inclusive space of learning for everyone.
When we talk about inclusive spaces of learning we believe
that it is necessary to think about a broad range of settings.
Apart from trainings we think for example about:
team situations and meetings;
a group of people who wants to set up a project;
a team who wants to organise an event. This can be a conference
or something like a local village festival.
This is why we decided to increase the focus for our handbook
from just inclusive trainings to a broader picture of inclusive spaces of
learning.
During the 3 years of the project we kept on asking ourselves and
others the same question:
How can we organise and perform spaces of learning more
inclusively?
Looking back on what we have tried, we can still improve.
1 way to become better is to make as much experiences as possible.
The only way you can find out what works and what does not work in
which situation is by trying things out.
The reason for this is because every situation is different and
every participant in a situation is unique in his or her own way.
Page 8
That is why there will always be:
different preferences,
needs
and details that have to be taken into account.
Making new learning experiences is also important
because our societies are for the most part still not inclusive.
So we are all only at the beginning of a road
that we want to walk together.
We want to practice, experience and live diversity.
We hope that you will find our handbook helpful and inspiring.
We also want to apologize if you are missing something in this
handbook.
But the topic of inclusion is so big that we had to make choices
what to cover and what not.
We are not the 1st persons who have developed guidelines or collected
and worked out clues and best practices.
There are many more useful sources out there.
Whenever possible we want to support you with links to other papers or
information about the topic of inclusion and inclusive learning.
You can find these links in every chapter.
We have tried to write this handbook in clear and
understandable language.
We explain all difficult words we have used in the dictionary.
All words you can find in the dictionary are underlined.
The dictionary stands at the end of the document in chapter 11.
This handbook does not fully meet easy to read standards.
It has not been proofread by people with learning difficulties.
It has also been written by non-native English-speakers.
Page 9
What is the aim of this handbook?
To serve as an orientation when organising
an inclusive space of learning.
To make people feel more secure
when they organise an inclusive space of learning.
To make people feel more secure
when they are part of a space of learning and
demand what is necessary to them and others
to make the event more inclusive.
To put an end to the fear of doing something wrong when organising
an inclusive space of learning.
To give examples of what has worked well for others so far.
To show that in many cases there is no right or wrong.
For whom is this handbook?
Everybody who wants to organise an inclusive space of learning.
Everybody who takes part in an event which could or should be
inclusive and wants to support the organisers with ideas.
Trainers or educators who want to work inclusively.
Page 10
How is this handbook structured?
At the very beginning you find the introduction in chapter 1.
The introduction explains who we are and why we made this handbook.
It also gives you an insight on the questions that guided us during the
project period.
After the introduction we show you 5 opinions of experts
for inclusive spaces of learning.
You find their views in chapter 2.
Then you find the guidelines for inclusive spaces of learning
in chapter 3.
This is a collection of clues and recommendations
based on our experiences.
They help you when you want to organise an inclusive event.
The guidelines are followed by a checklist in chapter 4.
This checklist is like a short version of the guidelines
for inclusive spaces of learning and
serves you to check
whether you have thought of the most important things
when you organise an inclusive event.
The next chapter deals with 1 detail of learning spaces.
It supports you when you create written material for your learning event.
It gives you recommendations
how to make your written material accessible
for people with learning difficulties.
Chapter 5 is called ‘guidelines for creating accessible written materials
for people with learning difficulties’.
Page 11
We think that evaluation is an important part of an event.
It helps you to learn and improve.
Thus the next 2 chapters are about to evaluation.
We made an evaluation sheet for Person Centred Planning courses.
We made this sheet during the project period.
We made it in easy to read.
You can find the evaluation sheet in chapter 6.
But there are more ways to make an evaluation.
You can find these in the recommendations we give you in chapter 7.
Chapter 7 is called
‘guidelines for an evaluation of inclusive spaces of learning’.
In chapter 8 you find guidelines for setting up
inclusive teams in work & training.
These guidelines help you to set up an inclusive team.
Of course these are also only recommendations and not complete.
The next 2 chapters are about examples
that have worked well for experienced people.
In chapter 9 you find
good examples of training materials or exercises.
In chapter 10 you find
training material of Person Centred Planning courses.
And finally chapter 11 of the handbook is the dictionary.
Here you find the explanations of the complicated words we had to use.
Page 12
We know that a handbook with so many pages and chapters
is not easy to read at all.
But we do not want to miss any of the chapters.
We think all of them are important.
The handbook is a collection of many things.
Therefore you don’t have to read it from the beginning to the end.
If you only look at the chapter which is important for you
at the moment,
it hopefully fulfils your needs and makes it easier for you.
What are the questions that guided us in making this handbook?
And what are the answers we found to these questions?
What is an inclusive space of learning?
An inclusive space of learning is a setting where
people with different backgrounds meet to learn something together.
This can be for example a training course, a conference or
a team meeting.
With different backgrounds we mean
for example different educational levels or different individual needs.
Every learning setting is somehow an inclusive space of learning,
because in every group there are people with different needs.
Page 13
Usually we take this for granted and do not pay particular attention.
This is the way we have usually experienced it
at schools or in adult education.
For some learners the pace and methods are fine,
for others it might be too slow and for others too fast.
The more diverse a group of people is and
the more their needs for learnings differ from each other
the more of a challenge it gets.
Then the chances are high
that not everybody’s expectations can be met and
trainers, organisers and participants can get unsatisfied.
When people refer to inclusive spaces of learning
they usually mean a setting with
very different backgrounds of participants.
In this case trainers or organisers have to make changes in
organisation,
activities and
behaviour.
For example:
A diverse group takes part in a learning setting
which includes people with learning disabilities,
hearing impairments, visual impairments and
people without any disabilities.
Within our project the term ‘inclusive’ originally referred to people with
disabilities and learning difficulties.
But after 3 years of learning, we want to widen the concept and use it as
an explained above:
An inclusive space of learning is a setting where
people with different backgrounds meet to learn something together.
No matter with or without disabilities.
This could be a training, a staff meeting or
a meeting of a project team.
Page 14
Is there a definite right or wrong
to make a learning setting inclusive?
Writing this handbook we were having some discussions about what
supports an inclusive space of learning.
These are our conclusions:
Every situation is different.
Something can work well for the participants in 1 situation but does
not work in another situation or for other participants.
We want to give you an example of a discussion we had:
We wanted to put the following recommendation in the guidelines:
Personal support should be provided by professional supporters
and not by other participants.
We made this recommendation because
the evaluation of another project had shown that
participants who supported others could not follow the training anymore.
They were unsatisfied with their own learning because they had to
concentrate too much on the support of their colleague.
After putting this recommendation in the guidelines
we had the following discussion.
Some said that it would be good to create conditions for natural support,
because natural support can encourage real inclusion.
Natural support is the opposite of professional support.
Especially when everybody in a group takes turns and everybody gives
and receives support.
So they wanted us to withdraw this recommendation.
Page 15
Other participants said that professional support is necessary
that every participant can concentrate on their learning.
And if you have to support somebody else you are not able to fully
participate yourself.
So there were 2 contrary opinions.
In the end we decided to put following recommendation:
The role of people supporting participants with disabilities or
learning difficulties must be clear before the training begins.
This makes both types of support possible.
It tries to avoid dissatisfaction of participants with certain roles,
as the role of each participant should be clear before or
at the beginning of an inclusive space of learning.
Should every learning setting be an inclusive space?
The participants of the project also had different opinions here.
Some said no and argued that the participants should always match
the aim of a learning setting.
To make this question easier to understand
we like to share with you this example of a Spanish-course:
People who take Spanish courses obviously have the same aim.
They want to learn Spanish.
Some have never spoken in Spanish before.
Some already feel secure in having easy conversations.
So there are usually different levels of Spanish courses,
for example the beginners level or the advanced level.
Page 16
Would it make sense to have the same course for everybody?
For us the answer is no,
because participants of both levels would be disappointed.
For some the course would be too fast and
they would hardly understand anything.
For others the course would be boring.
The result would be that nobody learnt as much as they could.
All participants would not really benefit from the course.
Others said yes,
of course every learning setting should be inclusive.
Even in our example of the Spanish course.
We just have to think in a different way:
The common aim of all participants in the Spanish course is
communicating with others in Spanish.
The best way to learn how to communicate with others is
by doing this in a group with people with totally different levels.
So both sides have their arguments.
We understand both of them.
Thinking about inclusion the only right answer is
that there is no definite right or wrong way of doing things.
As a general conclusion we suggest to think about
different groups of participants that are possible in a learning setting
when you are planning it.
The ‘right’ group of participants should help to support
the aim of the learning setting that you wish to organise.
Page 17
2. Interviews with experts
Making this handbook we often came across different opinions.
We also noticed that thinking about doing things differently
often makes people afraid.
These fears keep them from just trying out something new.
Thus we want to show you 5 different opinions from experts,
so that you can see that:
different things are important for different people.
even people with experience often face challenges and
they do not know the answers before trying things out.
We made interviews with 5 experts from our project.
All of them are experienced in organising and
working in inclusive spaces of learning.
1 of the experts is a trainer with learning difficulties.
We asked each of the 5 experts the same 3 questions.
For every question you will see
what the different experts have answered.
This way you can compare the answers of the experts.
Page 18
1st we want to give you a short introduction to the experts
we have interviewed:
The 1st expert is Stefan Ager.
He is from Austria.
He works as a trainer for people with and without disabilities and
learning difficulties.
He is also in charge for the safety in his company.
He is a self-advocate with a physical disability and learning difficulties.
Here is the link to the company he works with:
http://www.innovia.at/neu/
The 2nd expert is Ester Ortega.
She is from Spain.
In her work she supports individuals, families and organisations
to enable meaningful lives
for people who are vulnerable, disadvantaged or have disabilities.
She is now a director at Fundación Tuya.
Here is the link to this foundation:
http://fundaciontuya.net/
Page 19
The 3rd expert is Elisabete Mendes.
She is from Portugal.
She works as a trainer for people with and without disabilities and
learning difficulties.
She works as a university teacher
at the Polytechnics Institute of Portalegre.
She worked as psychologist at FENACERCI.
Here is the link to the company:
http://www.fenacerci.pt/web/
The 4th expert is Slavenka Martinovic.
She is from Croatia.
She organizes and provides inclusive trainings.
She works together with people with learning difficulties as co-trainers.
She works as the director of the Centre for adult education
named Validus.
Here is the link to this education centre in English:
http://coovalidus.hr/en/
Page 20
The 5th expert is Dorothee Meyer.
She is from Germany.
She works at the University of Hannover.
She makes inclusive courses for students and
people with learning difficulties
about democracy and political participation.
The word democracy means
government based on participation of the people,
either directly or through elected representatives.
Here is the link to her work:
http://www.gemeinsamlernen.uni-hannover.de/
Here is the 1st question we asked them:
What makes a space of learning inclusive for you?
We asked them to name the 5 most important things for them.
Stefan Ager answered:
The trainers main task is to support a loose, informal atmosphere
between the participants.
This reduces tensions between the different people.
The trainers should understand the feelings of the participants.
The trainers should know many different training methods,
so he or she can include every participant.
The trainers should have the right attitude and values,
for example appreciation and respect for people with their differences.
Page 21
The trainers should be well prepared and
the participants shall know before the training or event
what they have to expect.
Ester Ortega answered:
Clear vision of the work as a trainer
Different people and methods
Trainer includes and motivates all participants and
gives them an active and creative role
Trainers focus on and work with positive aspects and skills
Good feeling and confidence
Elisabete Mendes answered:
Inclusive attitude:
The trainers have in mind that there are different people in the group
Respect difference:
Different learning styles and different work pace.
Support participation:
Everyone should have the opportunity to participate.
Clear and eays language:
Use different information and explain things with words, pictures
and other material.
Provide accessibility:
Adapt contents, materials and learning situations.
Page 22
Slavenka Martinovic answered:
Feeling that we are doing a ‘good job’.
Accessible space and equipment,
for example tables and chairs, light and so on.
Comfortable and safe space.
Enough coffee brakes.
To ensure enough time for everybody.
Dorothee Meyer answered:
An inclusive learning space must be accessible and
provides enough space for everyone:
This means for example that there are no stairs,
an elevator, a ramp or many helping hands.
Tables and chairs can be cleared up or put aside.
All group members should be open minded for inclusive learning.
The following points apply to all learning groups:
o In an inclusive group learners and teachers take care of each other
and are responsible for each other.
They let the others know about their questions or needs.
o If they think that anyone needs help, they ask whether that is true.
o They say what they like or dislike and
make suggestions of how learning can be improved
Page 23
Here is the 2nd question we asked them:
What is the biggest challenge for you
in inclusive spaces of learning?
We asked them to name the biggest challenge for them.
May this challenge be organisational or personal or whatever.
We also asked them to explain a little why it is such a challenge for them.
Stefan Ager answered:
It is a challenge for me that people with learning difficulties have
different levels of knowledge.
For me as a trainer that makes it sometimes difficult to communicate
the content in a way that everyone understands everything.
Having a mixed group with participants with and
without learning difficulties makes this usually even more challenging.
Ester Ortega answered:
Not everyone in the group must learn the same and
participate in the same way.
That is not a goal.
The most challenging thing is that the goal for the group
can be reached with all the different contributions of
every group member.
Page 24
Elisabete Mendes answered:
Organisational matters are not a problem.
The main challenge is to address the needs of all participants.
But, I think that the biggest challenge is:
to support active participation and respect among the group.
to consider the abilities, skills and knowledge
that the different participants have,
in particular when we have persons with learning difficulties in the
group.
Slavenka Martinovic answered:
To get organisers and policy makers like ministries or local governments
to make easy to read material.
Often they do not even see the use of it
because they are so unfamiliar with it.
It is sometimes hard to convince them of the sense of it.
Dorothee Meyer answered:
The beginning of a course is really important.
It needs a good plan and enough time.
A good beginning is very important for inclusive learning.
To convince staff members and not disabled learners of the fact
that people with learning difficulties are interested in learning and
that they can be good learners.
Some people think that people with learning disabilities
do not need any further education or new ideas when they are adults.
It is a challenge to deal with people
who are able and motivated to learn in groups
but who are not used to it because of their bad experiences.
In this case you have to find a balance between their personal needs and
the group needs.
Page 25
Trainers can manage this when they speak openly with the group and
the individuals and name the difficulties.
Here is the 3rd question we asked them:
Have you ever been in a situation where you thought:
‘here it would be better to work or learn separately’,
meaning that the group shall be divided into groups,
for example with or without disabilities,
young people or elderly people,
people with or without migration background?
We asked them to describe the situation and
explain why they thought so.
Stefan Ager answered:
This thought comes to my mind sometimes in a training,
when I do not know how to go on.
I know that separating the groups would make it easier sometimes.
But that does not correspond to my idea of inclusion and
would therefore be wrong.
Ester Ortega answered:
This does only make sense to me in very particular situations and
for a certain time.
We should always keep in mind our goal.
Our goal is to find new ways of inclusion.
If we want to do this, this does only make sense if we do it together,
not separated.
Page 26
Elisabete Mendes answered:
I think that there is no need for that,
if we manage to support a real inclusive learning situation
and that different backgrounds can be an added value
for all the participants;
Maybe, only in a situation of a specific request of the group.
Slavenka Martinovic answered:
No, but I’ve heard and read about it.
Unfortunately, in my country there is strong resistance
to include Roma children in national ‘main stream schools’.
Non-Roma parents are fighting that idea and
try to find ‘good’ reasons for that.
Dorothee Meyer answered:
I think it depends on the learning topic.
There are situations when you need small divided groups
to talk about specific questions.
This should be ok and usual.
Important for me is that the separation of the group is done
on a voluntary base and each member can chose
his or her group self-determined.
Page 27
3. Guidelines
for inclusive spaces of learning
A guideline is a suggestion that tells you how to do something
or how you should behave.
A guideline is not a rule.
These guidelines give you clues
for organising inclusive spaces of learning.
Inclusive means that spaces of learning are particularly welcoming
to all kinds of people.
For example:
People with different needs.
People with or without disabilities or learning difficulties
Elderly or young people
People with migrant background or refugees
People with different education levels
And many more
Every setting where people come together to work on a shared topic or
idea can be an inclusive space of learning for everyone.
When we talk about inclusive spaces of learning we believe
that it is necessary to think about a broad range of settings.
Apart from trainings we think for example about:
team situations and meetings;
a group of people who wants to set up a project;
a team who wants to organise an event. This can be a conference
or something like a local village festival.
Page 28
These guidelines are divided into 3 parts:
1. Before the training
What you should consider before the actual training.
2. During the training
What you should be aware of during the training.
3. After the training
What you should do after the training
3.1. Before the training
When you plan an inclusive training you should consider the following:
3.1.1. Target groups
Design and plan the inclusive training together with
representatives of the target groups.
This way you can make sure that your target groups are really interested
in the content of the training.
The target groups know best what they want and
what their individual needs and expectations are.
The target groups mean the people that you want to participate in the
training.
Page 29
3.1.2. Venue
Choose a venue fulfilling the following requirements:
Accessibility:
You must consider different types of disability and
their needs for accessibility.
You must also consider that the venue hast to stay accessible
with bad weather conditions.
You find a checklist for an accessible space of learning in chapter 4.
Access to public transport
Parking places for people with disabilities close to the entrance
3.1.3. Arrival instructions
Give clear arrival instructions.
The instructions must be accessible for all participants.
For example:
Written documents must be accessible by screen reader software.
Screen reader software reads out loud written documents or
a website to blind people and people with visual impairments.
Some standard formats are not very accessible.
Provide different possibilities of contact:
o By e-mail
o By post
o By telephone
Prepare the venue as follows
Fix signs which support the participants to find their way around.
For example: Use different signs for the different rooms.
Always work with symbols and colours on the signs.
You can start with the signs at the bus station
with the logo of the training and arrows which show the way.
Page 30
3.1.4. Accommodation
Look for accessible accommodation close to the venue and
inform the participants.
Many European cities offer links to accessible accommodations
on their website.
3.1.5. Application and announcements
Application and announcements
should be accessible for people with different needs:
o The announcements of the event should be spread
via different media.
For example: by e-mail, by internet, by post, by radio, by TV, face-
to-face and so on.
o Give the following information about the event
plenty of time ahead:
- Venue
- Date
- Time and schedule of training and breaks
- Any costs such as meals at and around the venue or
if meals are provided or not.
So that people can organise themselves.
o Collect personal data about individual needs
of the participants and
whether they come with an assistant or not.
You can ask these things on the application form.
Texts must be written in easy to read and
must be accessible for persons with visual impairments.
You find more information about
how to create easy to read material
in the guidelines for creating accessible materials in this handbook in
chapter 5.
Page 31
To apply for participation should be possible in different ways:
o Verbal: by telephone or face-to-face
o Written: by post, e-mail or internet
Provide a meeting for interested people,
where they can get all required information about the training.
The date of the meeting should provide enough time
for interested people to think about whether they participate or not.
For example:
o Interested people can get all the information they want
about the training.
For example: how often the training takes place,
when it begins, when it ends,
how much work they will have to outside of the courses.
o Explain what the training is about and
what might happen during the training.
For example, that participants have a look on their own lives and
personalities;
o Talk about what participants can do with the knowledge and
experience from the training.
Talk about where in their life participants can use
what they will learn.
o Inform the participants that it will be an inclusive training and
what this means.
For example, that there will be participants with learning difficulties
and different teaching and
training methods will be used.
Different methods are important
to meet different needs of participants.
o Interested people should be able to ask questions.
Plan enough time for this.
Clue: Choose the same venue for this meeting as for the training.
This will enable participants to become familiar with the venue.
Page 32
3.1.6. Support of participants
The role of people supporting participants with disabilities or
learning difficulties must be clear before the training begins.
Participants, who need support,
should get this support during the whole training.
Therefore you must clarify for example different possibilities of support
and costs of the support
Consider how to promote natural support.
Natural support means that the participants help each other.
For example during group works you can create situations
where the participants help and
learn from each other.
In an inclusive space of learning every participant should be able
to give and receive support.
Trainers and organisers of the training should talk about power and
power relations in the group.
For example:
Participants are all here because they want to learn something
together.
They are here in the same role as participants.
They are not in their roles for example as care givers and beneficiary
or employer and employee.
Trainers should talk about the role of every participant.
Provide preparation time for people with learning difficulties.
Give them documents of the training in advance and
personal support before the training if this is possible.
Page 33
Collect personal data about individual needs of participants and
about the environment of the event.
Trainers and organisers of the event need this information because:
o Individual needs like specific support must be known
to be able to meet the needs
o The type of disability shall be clear
to be able to plan and adapt the training methods.
For example, to make texts readable by screen reader software or
to arrange necessary adaptations before the training
o Personal characteristics of the participants are helpful
to plan the training and the exercises of the training
For example: if many participants like animals you can use
examples from animal wildlife
o if many participants have the same disability
you can find a peer-trainer with same disability and
experience as the participants and
design the training more practically
3.1.7. Trainers
Trainers, organisers and translators who work together
should have some preparation time to get to know each other.
If you want to know more about inclusive training teams
you can look at chapter 8, guidelines for setting up inclusive teams in
work & training.
Organisers should find trainers who really know about
the topic of the training.
They should have the ability to share their knowledge in different ways
and with different methods,
so that they meet the different needs of participants.
Page 34
3.1.8. Schedule
Training units must be short and there must be enough breaks.
People with learning difficulties or other mother tongues may find it
difficult
to follow the training.
They need and profit from short units and less units per day.
3.2. During the training
During an inclusive training you should be aware of the following:
3.2.1. Trainer couples
Work with trainer-couples.
1 person must be a self-advocate and an expert for his own disability.
The disability of the trainer should match the training topic.
Make sure the 2 trainers know how to work together well
Make sure the 2 trainers are acting as 2 equal trainers and
not as trainer and client or trainer and trainee.
Make sure the trainers with disabilities know enough to act as trainers.
They should attend and complete a ‘train the trainer’ course.
3.2.2. Training rules
Agree on common course rules together.
They should meet every participant needs
in order to have a good learning environment.
Make sure that every participant understands and
accepts these rules.
Page 35
Keep in mind:
The majority rules!
This means that if most participants want to work and talk fast,
it is likely that the whole group works fast.
This should not happen because
this may be too fast for some persons of the group!
Try to be aware of this and reflect on the different learning styles and
demands of all the participants.
Make common decisions on the rules for working in the group.
3.2.3. Clear and understandable language
Always use clear and understandable language
You can also use technical terms,
as long as you explain them.
This allows the participants to learn new words
Encourage the participants to use clear and
understandable language.
Do this for example by repeating
difficult to understand comments in easier language.
Be careful that you treat every participant equal and
with respect.
Don’t talk to people with disabilities as if you talk to children,
they are adults and you should treat them like this.
Try find to find out, how fast you can talk to every participant,
so that she or he understands.
Give them time to think about what you have said and to
answer.
Page 36
3.2.4. Additional time
Always give additional time:
To assistants to translate and communicate
with the participants they support
Be aware that they are the actual participants of the training.
To people who need more time to understand
To prepare additional exercises
for people who are quicker in understanding,
so they can use this time for practice.
3.2.5. Common characteristics
Concentrate on what the participants have in common,
not on the differences between them.
Doing so you can improve the cooperation of the participants and
create an inclusive working atmosphere.
3.2.6. Roles in the group
Try to give each participant a special role within the group.
Ask the participants if they really want to have a certain role.
Roles can also change.
For example, if someone is a good speller then she or he can
control the spelling.
Or if someone if funny, she or he can tell jokes from time to time
to brighten up the participants.
Or someone with a mobile phone or a watch can be the time keeper.
Page 37
3.2.7. Overview
Place the time table and schedule
where the participants can see it throughout the training.
The schedule should also show when the breaks are planned.
Tick off the items on the schedule when they are completed.
So the participants know where they are and what is still to come.
3.2.8. Methods and instructions
Work with the 2-senses-principle.
This means that you should always address at least 2 senses
with your training methods.
Senses are sight, hearing, taste, smell and touch.
For example:
When you write something down on the flip chart
you have to read it out loud as well.
This addresses the 2 senses sight and hearing.
Be aware which senses the participants are able to use.
Work with different methods,
so you address different personalities and learning styles.
Try to remember the individual needs of each person.
For example, some people might have a hard time
working in groups and
need to work on their own from time to time.
Other people might have difficulties to talk in front of many people and
need small groups to work well.
You should use methods you have experience with and
you also like
Do not copy somebody else’s methods.
Use different types of media,
for example movies, pictures and audio recordings.
Page 38
When you change the training method
be careful that each participant understands the sense of the method.
For example that you make a change of location
because of group work.
People who have difficulties with changes
should be affected by these as less as possible.
Adapt the learning material to the different needs and
abilities of the participants.
For example:
Provide easy to read texts and
pictures for people with learning difficulties.
Don’t use pictures for people with visual disabilities.
Give clear advices for people with autism.
If possible create an atmosphere of trust.
You may try to create this atmosphere by telling stories or
identifying strengths of the participants.
Also try to be humorous and take things easy.
Try to get participants to take part with an open mind,
open heart and open will
as it is described in theory U.
Do this for example using the recommended methods.
Page 39
Relate the topic of the training to everyday life
of the participants:
o Relate the topics to the different personalities of the participants.
Try to be as personal as possible.
o Explain what for and how a method can be used
o Give practical examples
o When you explain things,
it is helpful to summarise and repeat key points
both visually and in easy to read,
for example to support participants with learning difficulties.
This can be done by an organiser, by an assistant or
by a participant.
It must be clear from the beginning of a training who does this.
The ‘less is more’ training method:
This means participants should really get to know and understand
some methods and important messages.
Instead of having heard about many things but not understanding and
knowing even 1 of them.
Therefore it is better to give less information and
provide more time to discuss,
so that the participants can actually participate in the training. Less
information and tasks given by you also mean
more freedom for you to react on spontaneous and
individual needs of the participants.
Page 40
Give the participants the opportunity to talk about things
they have learnt,
also in small groups or pairs.
This is also called reflection.
Find new ways that participants can share
their comments and opinions with other groups.
For example that every group makes a flip-chart poster
with the opinions of the group members.
So everyone can see the opinions of the others but
nobody must speak out loud in front of all participants.
Give the participants the opportunity to share their opinions and
experiences.
Respect and value their comments.
Use the knowledge of the group.
The group knows more than each participant.
Together they may produce unexpected learnings and results.
Ask the participants and check if they understand
the content of the training.
Don’t just ask: ‚Is everything clear?‘
A lot of people do not dare saying
that they have problems with understanding.
This method can be used at the beginning of the training
to get an idea what the participants already know
about the topics of the training:
Prepare cards with questions about the topic of the training.
Each participant chooses a card and thinks about the answers,
alone or with the support of the group.
This method is called ‘pack of questions’
Page 41
The following methods can be used for repeating, refreshing and
visualizing a topic in a group or alone.
Using these methods you can also see
what the participants have learnt so far:
o mind map:
You write 1 topic in the middle of a flip chart and
make a circle around it.
Then you collect subtopics that come up to participants’ minds
regarding the topic.
You can go on like this and
make a circle around the collected subtopics and
collect more issues relating to the subtopics.
This method helps to collect and structure ideas and topics.
It shows the relationship between topics and subjects.
It also serves to focus on 1 topic when there are many ideas
around.
o brainstorming:
The trainer writes down all ideas of participants
regarding 1 topic or
participants write them down themselves.
After collecting all ideas you can start to structure them.
You can do this with a flip chart or
on slips of paper that you pin on a wall later on.
This method helps to collect ideas and suggestions
of the participants without any further comment necessary
Page 42
o wall-newspaper:
You need a poster in the room where the training takes place.
The poster must be there all the time so that
participants are able to write down or paint
their ideas or feedback on the poster.
This can happen during the training or breaks.
The trainer can talk with the participants
about the content of the poster at the end of the training.
This method helps to collect ideas and feedback.
o Quiz:
The trainer asks questions regarding the topic of the training.
You can split up in 2 or more groups.
The groups compete with each other.
The winner is group with the most correct answers.
The winner gets a prize.
This method only makes sense
if the participants and the trainer like to compete.
The method can be used to repeat a topic or
to find out what participants already know about a topic.
o Isle-exercise:
All participants write down their experiences
on 3 parts of 1 paper.
Each participant does this on his or her own.
The 1st part of the paper is called ‘Isle’
The participants write down what they have learnt and
the topics which they will use in the future.
The 2nd part of the paper is called ‘Bay’
The participants write down what they want to learn in the future.
Page 43
The 3rd part of the paper is called ‘Ocean’
The participants write down all their feelings and
other impressions they had during the training.
This is another method to check
what participants have learnt from the training.
More methods:
o go for a knowledge walk:
Tell the participants to think about the following questions
when they go for a walk:
- Which part of the training can I use for my daily work?
- What do I need to use the knowledge of the training
in my everyday life?
- Do I need help to use the things that I have learnt?
Finally during walking the participants exchange
their thoughts in pairs:
Each person has the opportunity to talk about her or his
experiences and thoughts.
The role of the other person is to listen carefully.
Then the roles are changed.
The other person talks and the 2nd person listens.
Before changing roles it is helpful to tell participants
to have a moment of silence.
This helps them to think more deeply about
what they have heard.
Page 44
o Story telling
This is another method you can use.
Stories can be shared by both the trainer and the participants.
Often it is helpful if the trainer starts by telling 1 story.
The stories should be related to the topic of the training
and about things that have really happened.
Good stories always show that
the person who tells the story has learnt something important.
This makes it easy for participants to connect to the topic and
to focus on the things that really matter.
Use surprise moments.
Surprises often open up people’s minds.
You can arrange an action or experience that makes people come
together on another level than discussion.
For example in the Person Centred Planning course in Spain
the trainer brought a rabbit and let it free in a certain moment.
After this surprise most participants were in a good mood
to share some personal experience with the group.
Make sure that people who learn and work quicker
than other participants get enough opportunities to be challenged.
o Work in groups and let them explain things.
o Give them additional questions and tasks.
o Give them the opportunity to learn something else.
For example social competences and patience.
Page 45
Keep in mind:
Learning is always a process.
Learning means to give the participants the opportunity
to make experiences and to change.
Sometimes also to change their views and opinions.
Learning is not about receiving a certain amount of input.
Try to make this also clear to the participants.
Explain work or preparation for the next training,
that should be done outside the course,
during the training.
Provide enough time so that questions may be clarified.
Make photo minutes.
Give participants enough time to give feedback and
to fill in an evaluation sheet.
Provide time for this in the schedule.
3.2.9. Interpreters and assistive tools
Provide sign language interpreters,
hearing loops or other hearing tools if necessary.
Hand out cards that participants can use to get your attention.
For example:
Use traffic-light-cards right from the beginning
to ensure that the speed and type of teaching
can be influenced by the participants at any time.
Green may stand for ‘I understand’, ‘ok’ or ‘yes’.
Orange may stand for ‘slow down’ or ‘repeat’.
Red may stand for ‘no’, ‘stop’ or ‘I have a question now’.
Page 46
You can use a talking stick when you are working in big groups.
The person who has the stick may talk.
The stick is handed from 1 person to the other.
3.2.10. Handouts
Make accessible handouts:
o Sort the pages and file them in folders.
o Make clear and readable copies.
o Make enough copies so every participant can keep his copy
for further use.
o Provide handouts for people with visual impairment and
blind people in an accessible digital form.
3.3. After the training
After an inclusive training or in between 2 parts of a training
you should consider:
Make the photo minutes accessible for each participant.
Send them by e-mail or if necessary by post,
typewrite the minutes down for people with visual impairments.
Use the feedback and the evaluation sheets
to make changes and to improve the training.
Support the participants in between 2 parts of the training.
For example:
Provide everybody with the contacts of the other participants
so that they can compare their notes or
work and learn together.
Provide support time for them.
Give the participants a location where they can meet and
work together.
Page 47
Make sure each participant gets a certificate.
These are very important for the participants and their employers.
If some participants have only made certain parts of the training
it is written down on the certificate.
Page 48
4. Checklist for an accessible space of
learning
Here you find the most important things to consider
when you want to make an accessible training or event.
Have you thought about everything?
Print this checklist and tick the boxes to check your accessibility.
4.1. Venue
4.1.1. General
Organisers inform trainers about special needs of participants and
measures in case of emergency
Offer support if required
Flag and secure danger spots
Provide stable handrail at stairs,
at least on 1 side.
Prepare the rooms and the furniture in a clear structure,
so that people find their way.
Provide a colour guiding system on floor and walls if possible.
They guiding system must be easy to understand and
with many pictures.
4.1.2. For people with learning difficulties
Give all information in clear and understandable language
together with many pictures.
For example: the menu, the map of the surrounding area
Page 49
4.1.3. For people with limited mobility
and wheelchair users
Provide parking space for people with disabilities
close to the entrance
Provide flooring on which people don’t slip easily
Provide disabled toilets.
If possible with Euro key
Don’t block the ways, for example with flip charts, pin boards or
decoration
Provide chairs with stable arm-rests
All rooms shall be reachable with wheelchairs.
Make sure every room is accessible with ramps, lifts, or stair lift
Wheelchair users must be able to use the tables.
This means that they can get under the table with their wheelchair so
that they can use the tabletop.
Do not use tall bar tables and chairs.
Tables must be easily moveable or
there must be enough room in between
4.1.4. For people with hearing impairment
Choose rooms with hearing loops or rent hearing tools
Use visual media: good labelling, visual alarm signal,
visual emergency call in lift
‘Check the lights and acoustics of the rooms,
so that people can see and hear everything clearly.
Arrange tables so that participants can see each other and
the trainers
Page 50
4.1.5. For people with visual impairment
and blind people
Provide all information in an accessible digital form.
For example the menu, the map of the surrounding area and so on
Make sure that nobody is dazzled by the lights,
especially at entrance, on the staircase and in the training rooms.
Use enough and good illumination
Make sure there are blinds on the windows
to keep out the sun light if necessary
Avoid reflecting floors or surfaces
Indicate stairs, glass panes and likewise
Make signs as big as possible and rich in contrast
Make sure the lift has acoustic announcement and tactile handling
Allow guide dogs and prepare water for the dog
Provide tables and power supply for assistive devices and technology.
Provide assistive devices and technology if possible and required,
for example a blackboard camera system.
This camera can focus on a blackboard,
a presentation or a person and
enlarge certain images on a display.
4.2. Communication with people with disabilities
4.2.1. General
Talk directly to the participant and
not to the supporting person
Behave respectfully, address people formally and
use adult language
Respond to all questions with patience
Page 51
Communicate on the same height,
for example sit down on a chair to talk to wheelchair users.
Do not get on your knees or bend over.
Talk clearly and slowly
4.2.2. For people with hearing impairment
Keep eye contact,
they might be reading your lips
Speak clearly and slow to produce a clear lip movement
Support lip-reading,
for example keep your mouth visible and not behind a hand, a
cigarette or a coffee-cup
Use short, clear sentences
Don’t shout
Tap on the shoulder or knock on the table to call attention
Write things down if necessary
Check whether the content has been understood
Work with a sign language interpreter if necessary
4.2.3. For people with visual impairment
or blind people
Announce important information using a gong or a microphone
Trainers and staff know techniques of a sighted guide,
for example you don’t grab the hand of someone to help him,
you offer your arm to hold on to.
Page 52
4.3. Training
4.3.1. General
Pay attention to an adequate working speed
Ask if everything has been understood (acoustically and with regards
to content)
Avoid pointing at concrete things and overhanging gesticulation
Mind using the 2 senses principle,
which means:
communicate visual information also verbally for example
4.3.2. For people with learning difficulties
Use clear and understandable language,
avoid foreign words or explain them
All flip-charts and prompt cards in block letters and easy to read
For better communication: prepare traffic-light-cards for all
participants
4.3.3. For people with limited mobility
and wheelchair users
No units with a long time of standing or walking
In case of activities keep in mind sufficient chairs or room for wheel-
chairs
Give enough time for breaks,
for example somebody needs more time for using the restroom
Page 53
4.4. Training-material
4.4.1. General
Keep in mind special needs (e.g. Computer-training: handling with
shortcuts or alternative input units: trackball, touch screen or digitiser
tablet)
4.4.2. For people with learning difficulties
Clear and understandable language
4.4.3. For people with visual impairment
or blind people
Use big letters which are rich in contrast
Send printed material also by mail.
If you use word documents or pdfs make sure they are accessible
for screen reader software
Page 54
5. Guidelines for creating accessible
written materials for people with
learning difficulties
Accessible written materials are important not only for people with
learning difficulties.
They are useful for everybody.
These materials make it easier to understand and to learn things.
If some persons want to have more information and
are willing to read more complicated texts,
you can always provide them with additional material or
tell them where more material about a topic can be found.
Participants can work with this additional material at home.
Some years ago another EU project, Pathways I,
has developed a good folder called ‘Information for all’.
It shows European standards for making information in easy to read and
thus understandable for people with intellectual disabilities.
This folder is written in easy to read.
Here is the link to the folder.
In German speaking countries people often work
with the capito standards for clear and understandable language,
called ‘Leicht Lesen’.
The following recommendations are based on these
capito standards.
Page 55
If you follow these recommendations your written texts will be
more accessible for people with learning difficulties:
Type size: at least 14 point
Typeface: Arial
No italics
No block capitals
Left-aligned
Clear content
Use headings and paragraphs to give a structure
Avoid technical language and foreign words
No abbreviations
No cross references or foot notes
Do not use difficult words.
If you have to use them you must explain them clearly.
Keep your sentences short.
Start a new sentence in a new line.
We want to give you this clue:
Work together with an organisation with expertise and experience
in easy to read.
They really know what to do.
They should also work together with self-advocates
who proofread your material.
So you can make sure that your material is really in easy to read.
You can also attend courses to learn how to create materials
in easy to read.
So you can become an expert yourself.
Page 56
If you want to know about courses or supportive organisations
in your country you can contact Inclusion Europe:
www.inclusion-europe.org
secretariat@inclusion-europe.org
Inclusion Europe is a non-profit organisation.
They advocate for the rights of people with intellectual disabilities and
their families.
Their members are national organisations in 39 countries.
They can advise you which organisation you can contact in your country.
Or you can look yourself on their website.
If you use the following link you can choose your country:
http://inclusion-europe.eu/?page_id=132
When you choose your country,
you will find organisations that work together with Inclusion Europe.
There you can ask your questions concerning easy to read
in your country.
There is a European network of people
who work in the sector of easy to read.
They also have a homepage.
This homepage is not easy to read.
This is the link to the homepage:
http://wordpress.easytoread-network.org/
Another model of making education accessible for all
is called ‘Universal Design’.
Details about it can be found on the internet.
We recommend this link to a video on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z94KPmPufT8
It explains Universal Design in a very good and easy way.
Page 57
6. Evaluation Sheet
This is an example of an evaluation sheet for an inclusive training.
It is the final version of the evaluation sheet we used for our project.
It has been revised by self-advocates of EPSA.
It is written in easy to read.
We used it after each module of a course on Person Centred Planning.
The evaluation after each module made it possible to react on the wishes
and needs of the participants and to adapt the next module.
On the following 5 pages you find the evaluation sheet.
Page 58
Feedback
Date of the training:___________________________________
Name of the training:__________________________________
Please mark your answer with a cross:
1. How much have you learnt in this training?
a lot quite a lot not enough nothing
Here is space to explain your answer if you want:
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
2. Have your needs been met?
For example: easy to read materials, accessibility, time, breaks, support
very much much not enough not at all
Here is space to explain your answer if you want:
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Page 59
3. Was the training hard for you?
not at all sometimes most of the time always
Here is space to explain your answer if you want:
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
4. Were you able to share your experiences?
a lot quite a lot not enough not at all
Here is space to explain your answer if you want:
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Page 60
5. How happy were you with the trainer or trainers?
very happy quite happy not really happy not happy at all
Here is space to explain your answer if you want:
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
6. How much did you like the way the training was
done?
very much ok not really not at all
What did you like in the training? Please explain:
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
What did you not like in the training? Please explain:
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Page 61
7. How did you feel with the group?
Examples: Did you find quickly someone to sit next to.
Did you talk to people during the breaks?
Did you feel included?
very happy quite happy not really happy not happy at all
Here is space to explain your answer if you want:
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
8. How happy are you with the organisation
of the training?
very happy quite happy not really happy not happy at all
Here is space to explain your answer if you want:
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Page 62
9. Did the trainer or trainers use your experiences
and your feedback during the training?
a lot quite a lot not enough not at all
Here is space to explain your answer if you want:
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
10. Is there anything else you would like to say?
Do you have ideas?
Here is space for it:
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
Thank you very much for your time and effort!
Page 63
7. Guidelines for an evaluation of
inclusive spaces of learning
You only become an expert in creating inclusive spaces of learning
by gathering experience.
You have to focus on what was working and
what was not working out and what you can do better next time.
Who would know better what was good or what could be better
than the participants of your inclusive space of learning?
This is what evaluation and feedback is all about.
Thus evaluation is very important.
There are many different ways how you can do an evaluation.
There are different types of evaluation.
The type of evaluation you should choose depends on many things.
Most importantly they should fit your target groups.
You have to ask yourself or even better the target groups:
What kind of evaluation makes sense?
These types of evaluation are very common:
Written:
With an evaluation sheet.
See the example developed in our project in easy to read in chapter 6.
o Advantages:
- You can look at the results later because you can archive them.
- They can be anonymous.
People tend to be more open if they need not to give their name.
o Disadvantages:
- For some people it might be too difficult,
it might take a lot of time or
it might be boring.
Page 64
Oral:
By asking the participants questions
you want to know the answer to.
o Advantages:
- For some people talking might be easier than writing.
- You get the feedback right away.
- You can ask questions if you do not understand the feedback.
o Disadvantages:
- Some people might be too shy to tell their opinion,
especially critical statements.
- It might be always the same people talking.
Interactive:
With symbols of smileys.
You ask some questions and participants can put a happy or a sad or
a neutral smiley to the question.
Or you can use red, green and yellow dots.
You ask the questions, pin them on a flipchart and
people can stick their opinion with points to the questions.
o Advantages:
- This may be the easiest way for people who are not able
to articulate why they feel in a certain way.
- People do not think too long,
their decision depends more on their feelings.
o Disadvantage:
You do not know why the participants answered this way.
Page 65
We made the best experiences
when we used a combination of the different types of evaluation.
We always included an interactive type of evaluation,
but also tried to find out why the participants answered this way.
Therefore we needed the explanations of the participants
either in spoken or in written form.
Which type of evaluation you select is up to you.
Sometimes 1 powerful and easy question
might be enough.
For example the question:
‘What should we do differently next time?
What else is important?
It is very important that you take the results of the evaluation seriously.
You must be prepared to react to the results and
the critical points that come up.
Even if you cannot or do not want to change certain things
for a good reason.
Talk about it and let the participants know why.
Participants will take evaluations seriously
when they see that it really serves to get their opinion and
to develop things further.
Please read the guidelines for inclusive spaces of learning
when planning an evaluation.
If you plan a written evaluation
you may use the guidelines for creating accessible materials
for your support.
Page 66
8. Guidelines for setting up inclusive
teams in work & training
Inclusive teams can be a very powerful way of creating
inclusive spaces of learning.
When we talk about inclusive teams
we mean that people with disabilities or learning difficulties and
people without disabilities work together professionally in 1 team.
When we talk about teams, these teams can be for example:
a team of colleagues, working in the same organisation
a project team
Here we mean a group of people who works together
for a certain period of time
to organise and carry out something together.
a team of volunteers organising a conference or a festival
a team of trainers
What the team members should have in common is
that they work for the same purpose.
Their common aim should be to reach good results together.
The guidelines for setting up inclusive teams in work & training
are not complete.
Some of the guidelines might not apply for every situation
in every team.
The guidelines are based on the experiences we have made.
Page 67
1 important area of experience is the company of innovia.
innovia was responsible for writing this handbook.
innovia is an inclusive company and works with inclusive teams.
innovia has about 25 employees.
About 7 employees have a disability or learning difficulties.
innovia often works with inclusive trainer teams to organise and
deliver training courses with and for people with disabilities and
learning disabilities.
innovia also works with inclusive teams doing its daily business
which is not always about performing trainings.
Thus we make experiences day by day.
Here we want to share our experiences and what we have learnt so far
with you.
But keep in mind: we are also still learning how to improve.
We are also far away from being perfect.
So do not hesitate but give it a try!
Please remember that our recommendations focus on people
who are working together as colleagues in a company.
In the end we give some more advice for people
who are only able to work on a temporary level with each other or
who want to do this.
In our project we have made experiences due to situations
that were working out and
due to situations that were not working out.
These experiences have shown us how we can make things better.
We want to share both kinds of experiences with you.
Page 68
We want to start with situations that were not working out.
Sometimes it is hard to find out what you want to do or
what you can do.
Then it helps to think about the things that you do not want to do
or should not do.
That is why we start with the things that we do not recommend:
Do not employ or work with somebody
just because of his or her disability.
If you do so, this person is being reduced to his or her disability and
you do not see the person with all of his or her competences.
If a person you want to work with
does not have the competences you need,
and if they cannot be achieved within a reasonable time
do not employ that person just because of social responsibility.
All people want to be seen with their abilities and strengths.
If your company does not seem to be the place
where the abilities of a certain person are needed at the moment and
if the employee cannot work in a meaningful way
no one will be satisfied in the end.
Do not focus on a disability or a disease.
Just because a person has a certain disability or disease
it does not tell you anything about his or her abilities or strengths.
Do not expect that working together will be easy from the start.
Every team needs its time to get to know each other.
Do not expect too much from yourself or from other team members.
Do not focus on the differences.
Page 69
Here is what we do recommend:
Employ people with the needed qualifications or
make sure he or she will be able to learn what is needed
in a reasonable time.
Work with the abilities and strengths of people
instead of thinking about their disabilities or diseases.
Ask the person what he or she needs, wants and
what he or she is able to do.
Everybody is different,
no matter what disability or disease he or she has.
Do not expect too much from your employees or
the people you plan to work with.
Every person has his or her knowledge and competences.
And each person can learn what he or she is able to learn.
Not less but also not more than that.
So if you keep on demanding impossible things from somebody
you and the other person will be continuously disappointed.
This does not mean that you should give people only tasks
that they can do easily.
People want and need to be challenged.
They like to be challenged in a way they can grow and learn.
This may sound quite difficult but it is important
to be continuously aware of the personal limits of
commitment of a person.
Work with clear job descriptions.
Make a detailed profile and a description of the tasks of a job.
Then your employee will be able
to see what he or she can fulfil and what not.
This is a good start to work with.
Page 70
Do job analysis regularly.
Job analysis can show where problems are and
what you can improve.
Some important things you have to do in a job analysis are:
o Ask the involved persons about their situation
o Look at all the tasks that have to be done
o Look at the issues where the job is connected to other jobs or
persons
o Compare the needs of the
position to the persons qualifications and interests
Give the members of a team a role as an expert
in their field of qualifications.
Try to give all of the team members who are willing
some other important role in the team.
For example: safety officer or health officer.
Consider working with ‘buddies’.
A buddy is somebody from the team
who supports a new colleague
so that he or she can ask easily questions and
find his or her role.
The buddy should not be the boss of the supported person.
Try to promote learning on peer level.
Team members shall learn from each another.
They should see each other as models and
and grow and learn from their common experiences.
Focus on things team members have in common and
not on the differences.
This can make work easier and more joyful.
Focus on the strengths of each team member.
Try to emphasise and support these strengths.
Page 71
Each team should have a clear purpose and
concrete tasks and targets.
Be adventurous.
Try out new things.
A lot of things we could not imagine at 1st
have become the best solutions for everyone.
Learn from every situation.
Mistakes always happen.
They are the best source for learning.
The recommendations we have just given from our experience
apply mostly to people who work together
as colleagues in inclusive teams.
From our experience this is not always the case.
Even in companies that work on the topic of inclusion
people with disabilities are rarely employed.
When we think of adult training, trainers are very often free lancers,
which means that they only work for a specific training and time.
Sometimes they do this job next to a regular working contract.
If people work in trainer teams it is usually temporary.
Here are some recommendations
that are useful for people
who work together as inclusive teams in training sessions:
Both the trainer with and without disabilities should be experienced.
Do not work with someone just because he or she has a disability.
Page 72
Preparation in training teams needs time.
Especially when you start to work with someone
you have not worked with before.
Once people have done more trainings together
the time for preparation becomes less.
Before you start to work together for the 1st time,
take some time to get to know each other.
Talk about the things that are important to you and
that you know well.
Good training teams always share important values and
have things in common.
But in good training teams every person also brings in
something personal.
Things do not work out perfect from the start.
In the beginning it is very important to have a clear plan
about who teaches what, why and when.
If there is or has to be a hierarchy in roles
this has to be made clear from the start.
Hierarchy in roles means that 1 person is trainer and
the other person is co-trainer.
This has to be communicated also to the participants of the training.
Be clear with each other about the meaning and
tasks of each role.
From our experience it is a very strong sign
when people with learning difficulties are in the role of a trainer.
Of course this needs a lot of prior experience.
During the training the trainers have to work as a team
in every moment of the training.
If they work against each other or
if there is a conflict the participants can feel this.
This conflict should be solved as soon as possible in private and
without the participants.
Page 73
The most important way for a trainer
to learn and grow is self-reflection.
After a training session has ended
share your experiences about what was working out and
what you could be done better next time.
Also give each other a constructive feedback.
Constructive means that something is about improvement and growth.
Always start with what you have appreciated about working together,
but also share what was hard for you.
Page 74
9. Examples of good practice
As you know, this handbook has been developed by
the ‘New Paths to InclUsion’ project.
The guiding question of the project has been:
‘How can we change services for people with disabilities
so that they respond to the needs and wishes of a person and
support him or her to live an inclusive life
as a contributing citizen in his or her community?’
In other words:
How is it possible to change services for people with disabilities.
Services are for example the support they get from an organisation or
the accommodation they are living in.
Service should be like the supported persons want them to be and
respect their needs and wishes.
Every person should be able to take part in everyday life and
to be a part of their neighbourhood or village.
The project was based on the principles of Person Centred Planning and
used theory U by Otto Scharmer as a way to guide our work.
1 thing we have done was to organise and
deliver inclusive training courses on Person Centred Planning
in different European countries.
Person Centred Planning is about assisting someone
to plan his of her life and make positive changes and
to help him or her to organise the assistance he or she needs.
Person Centred Planning is a process of listening and learning.
It focuses on what is important to someone now and in the future.
People plan and try to live a life together with family, friends, allies and
useful paid supporters.
Page 75
People try to live a life with their strengths being respected and
as a part of the community.
Theory U shows us how we can change things in a different way and
how we can create new ways for people with disabilities
to live a good life.
The examples of good practice are about
training people in Person Centred Planning and
using ideas and methods of theory U.
9.1. Example: Multiplication Course
1 of the results of the project has been a multiplication course.
We have produced material you can use to do a similar course.
Therefore it is called multiplication course.
1 module of this course was about ‘Inclusive Spaces of Learning.’
This module was held in Prague in April 2015.
The summary of this course and the instructions are
not in easy to read.
The material you use during the course is as easy as possible.
The whole course is designed to be an inclusive course.
You can just go and try to do it yourself!
You can find this material and all the information you need here.
Page 76
9.2. Example: 4 types of listening
According to Otto Scharmer there are 4 types of listening.
The 1st type is called ‘downloading’.
When you download, everything you hear
only confirms what you already know.
You only hear what confirms your opinion.
The 2nd type is called ‘factual listening’.
When you listen factually you listen to facts.
You ask questions and you look for new facts or data.
It does not matter if those facts confirm your opinion or not.
You are open to new perspectives.
You have to open your mind to listen this way.
The 3rd type is called ‘empathic listening’.
When you listen empathically
you are really open to what the other person feels.
You may change from your position to the position of the other person
and understand and fell what he or she feels.
You may see it with the eyes of the person you are listening to.
You have to open your mind and your heart to listen this way.
The 4th type is called ‘generative listening’.
When you listen generatively
you are not the same person after the conversation
than you have been before the conversation.
Something has changed within yourself during the conversation.
You and the other participants of the conversation have been open
to generate something new.
You have to open your mind, your heart and your will to listen this way.
Page 77
Here is a picture that shows the 4 types of listening drawn by Ester
Ortega:
More Information about the ways of listening can be found
in Otto Scharmer’s material about theory U or on various websites.
Here is 1 link you can find information about it.
Page 78
9.3. Example: Theory U
In the course of the project John O’Brian and Ester Ortega developed
a document to explain theory U in understandable words and
with expressive pictures.
It has not been proofread by self-advocates and
the format does not comply with some easy to read standards
but we think you find it as helpful as we do.
Here is the link to the document.
Here you find another easy to read introduction to theory U by John O’Brian.
Page 79
10. Training material
for Person Centred Planning
On the website of our project you can find:
the descriptions of the modules of the training course
on Person Centred Planning in different languages
the descriptions of the modules and many methods in Person
Centred Planning.
Unfortunately most of these materials are not in easy to read.
To become a trainer for Person Centred Planning you need:
practical experience
to be part of a Community of Practice.
These are people who also have made experiences and
meet on regular bases to talk about what they are learning.
The examples we have picked can be used
in inclusive training courses on Person Centred Planning,
but they might also be used for different things.
Many of the following examples provide skills
that are important for trainers in inclusive training groups.
Page 80
10.1. Example:
Gaining confidence in my own skills
as graphic facilitator
10.1.1. Background
Graphic facilitation and drawing are very important in
Person Centred Planning.
It is a way to communicate and to learn complex things more easily
no matter if someone has a disability or not.
For people who cannot read or have a hard time reading,
graphic facilitation is even more important.
Training people in Person Centred Planning we must give them
confidence that everyone can draw.
Graphic facilitation is a good thing in any inclusive space of learning.
For most of us drawing does not come naturally anymore.
As a child all of us have spent time drawing and enjoying it.
To rediscover these hidden talents you can use the following exercise:
10.1.2. Exercise
Instruct the participants to paint a picture in the same way they did
when they were 5 years old.
Therefore each participant gets a big poster to draw.
They can stuck the poster on the wall or lay it down on the floor.
Put on different kinds of music,
for example classic, pop, metal or samba music.
Tell the participants to paint their emotions as if they were 5 years old.
Note: You can also support people by showing them
different styles of drawing symbols.
This can support them to find a way
which fits most their personal style of drawing.
Page 81
This way you can convince even the biggest self-critical person and
make him or her draw something.
Here is a photo of some results of a training:
This example is from Sonia Holubka from Slovakia and
Milena Johnova from the Czech Republic.
Both are experienced trainers in their home countries.
Page 82
10.2. Example:
Reflect on the current situation and
find out what makes a good person centred
review
10.2.1. Background
To begin this exercise it helps to know what we mean by a review and
to explain what it is to the group.
The information below explains what a review is.
You can choose how much of it you want to talk about with the group.
A review is when people supporting a person with disabilities
meet together to talk about
how they should support the person with disabilities.
It is a meeting to find out what the person needs and
what the staff needs to do.
It is important to clarify the participants understanding of a review,
because it helps to find out from the participants on the training what kind
of meetings they have in their services.
The type of meetings where decisions about people with disabilities are
made varies across Europe.
In different European Countries decisions about people with disabilities
are made in different ways.
In many European countries people who have support
have a review meeting every year to talk about what has changed.
Page 83
The important staff, family and friends meet
together with the person to think about
what has happened in the person’s life.
They talk about any changes and
how the person needs to be supported in their life and
to keep the person in good health.
They may decide on goals to reach.
They will talk about problems and try to solve them
In some European Countries like in the United Kingdom there are laws
which say that the person has to have a review meeting every year.
In the meeting they talk about what is happening in their life and
decide what support they need.
If the person has a personal budget
the social services workers in the meeting will listen
to what everyone says who is supporting the person and
decide how much money the person receives for their support
in the future.
Children with disabilities will have a review meeting
to decide on the support they need in school as well as in their lives.
At the age of 14 a young person with a disability will have
a review meeting to decide what support they might need
as they become adults.
This meeting is called a transitional review.
Other persons may have a review meeting if they go to a day centre or
sheltered workshop or
if they live in a supported house or institution.
The staff attending the meeting may be social workers, doctors,
psychologists, occupational therapists, managers and support staff.
The person may be invited and also their family.
Page 84
If the person is involved
the style of the meeting can also be supportive to the person to
participate and attention is given to the person’s views and wishes.
If the person with disabilities is at the meeting
everyone should do their best to help
so that the person understands what is happening and
to listen to the person.
This does not always happen.
In some countries there are no laws to have a review meeting
about the person.
Note:
Good person centred practice means we should:
invite people to meetings about them
listen to what they say
learn what is important to them
involve them in making decisions
make a plan so the decisions happen
10.2.2. Group Exercise
Ask the participants work in groups and
to think about what meetings about people with disabilities are like now.
It helps if they make groups with people from the same place as them or
who they work with.
The group will have experience of the same kinds of review meetings.
Explain you want them to think about
‘what review meetings are like now’.
It helps to have the questions below written up on a flip chart.
Explain that you want them to think really deeply about the meeting and
that the questions on the flip chart will help them
to talk about their meetings in the group exercise.
Page 85
Write these questions on a flip chart:
What is the meeting about?
Who is asked to come to the meeting?
Who does come to the meeting?
Who is in charge?
Which people talk the most?
How is it recorded what people say?
For example: written protocol and drawings
Who records it?
Where is the meeting held?
When is it held?
How long is it?
Are there refreshments?
Are people given drinks or snacks?
What happens after the meeting?
What are the typical actions or outcomes?
What is usually decided?
Who gets the record of the meeting?
What does the recorded information tell us about the review meeting?
What have you learnt about the meetings that you have now?
You may ask each group to give some feedback
before going onto the next question.
What would a really great review look like?
Explain that you want the groups to think about
‘how a better review meeting would look like ‘.
Ask them to make a picture of
‘what would happen in a really good person centred review meeting’.
Making a picture helps the groups to see what they are thinking.
It is a good way of really understanding things in a deep way.
Page 86
Seeing the picture and talking about it can build a stronger idea of
what could be done to make meetings better.
It helps to say to the group
‘make a picture of the very best review meeting’.
This helps them to stretch their ideas and
really think about what this could be like.
It might be very different from the meetings that they already know and
that are happening now.
When each group has finished their picture,
ask the groups to think about
‘what changes could be made now
to make the review meeting better’.
It may not be possible to make it the very best straight away but some
things could change to make it better.
Some additional questions to discuss in the groups are:
Do the groups feel that they have the power to change the meeting?
What do they need to do to make it happen?
What support do they need to make it happen?
When the groups have had time to discuss and write down their thoughts
ask for 1 person from each group to share:
What are reviews like now
The posters
What they could change
It may help to give each group a set time to talk of 3 to 5 minutes.
This example is from Julie Lunt from Great-Britain.
Julie is an experienced trainer in Person Centred Planning and
has made trainings all over Europe.
Page 87
10.3. Example:
Module 1 of the Person Centred Planning
course
The following exercises are all taken from the 1st module
of the Person Centred Planning course in Spain.
This module has been held by Ester Ortega in 2014.
The 1st module is an introduction to Person Centred Planning.
The objectives of the module are amongst other things:
Start thinking about how we are and who we are.
Before helping others think, we should think about ourselves.
Make ourselves aware of what we think about ourselves.
Find out where we are in life.
Get to know what we like and what we do not like.
Being able to support the decisions of others better.
Being able to listen to others in a certain way.
If we can listen in a certain way, we can support them in another way.
Bring people into the mood so that they want to change something!
Miss Ortega worked in Spanish.
We translated her work from Spanish into English.
Page 88
10.3.1. Exercise 1
Instructions:
All participants are sitting in a semi –circle.
Introduce the person in front of you to the group
as if he or she was a visitor from another planet.
Each participant does this with the person in front of him or her.
The trainer does not give more instructions and
does not give any example;
The participants should react spontaneously and with creativity.
Purpose of the exercise:
With this exercise the participants get to know
how others describe them.
Relationship to Person Centred Planning:
It is important to know who we are and
from which position we operate from.
To be aware of why we do what we do.
To be aware of our own beliefs.
It is important to observe the other person
from your personal point of view.
This reflects how you feel, how you think and how you do.
Page 89
10.3.2. Exercise 2
Instructions:
The trainer places small envelopes of different colors and
labeled with the 1st name of each of the participants on the tables.
Participants search for the table with an envelope with their name and
take a seat at that table.
Tell everybody to take a post-it and
to write down the answers to these questions:
What would I like to happen in the training?
What do I want to achieve in the training?
Participants who want may tell the whole group what they have written
down on the post-it.
Then the participants put the post-it in their envelope.
They may have a look at it later at the end of the training or
after the training.
Purpose of the exercise:
The trainer sees the expectations of the participants and
can meet these expectations more easily.
Participants can see if the things they wished for have happened or
if they have achieved what they wanted to achieve
when they look at their post-it later.
Page 90
10.3.3. Exercise 3
Instructions:
The trainer tells the participants to write their obituary in the newspaper
or to publish an article.
An obituary is a notice about the death of someone.
An obituary describes the life of a person.
Each person does this for herself or himself.
After writing the obituary,
those participants who want,
can stand up and share with the whole group what they have written.
Purpose of the exercise:
With this exercise participants can start to think about:
how they want to be seen by other people and
what they have to do to be seen this way.
10.3.4. Exercise 4
Instructions:
The trainer asks the participants to draw a house on a post-it.
The participants do not get further instructions.
Each participant draws for himself or herself.
When done with the 1st drawing,
the trainer asks them again to draw a house.
Again participants do not get further instructions.
The trainer asks participants to do this 4 times,
so that every participant finally has drawn 4 houses.
Page 91
Results of the exercise:
The 1st time most houses look pretty the same:
a house with a pitched roof.
The 2nd time the houses are more different from each other.
The 3rd and 4th time the houses are very different form each other,
with more varieties of different houses than before.
Purpose of the exercise and
the relation to Person Centred Planning:
There are times that we respond as professionals with the same answer
for everybody who needs support.
This is the same like drawing the same house with a pitched roof
at the beginning of the exercise.
It needs more time and more thinking
to find alternative ways of living and supporting a person.
With this exercise we want to show that we must look for alternatives and
individual solutions we have not thought about in the 1st place.
This often needs a 2nd or a 3rd try or more.
We have to find out if we give the same obvious support to everyone or
if we try to find an individual way of supporting someone?
Our response to this question is linked to this exercise.
1st we will give the same solution to everybody,
but if we keep asking ourselves the same question over and over again,
we will come with more individual and adequate solutions of support.
Page 92
10.3.5. Exercise 5
Instructions: The trainer hands out a paper with 9 points on it.
Each participant gets such a paper.
The points have following formation:
Then the trainer asks the participants to
join the 9 points with 4 consecutive lines.
The solution you find here. The purpose of the exercise and
the relation to Person Centred Planning:
The process of finding a solution can make you feel uncertain and
anxious.
It can cause stress to find the right solution.
These feelings accompany the whole process
of Person Centred Planning.
But these feelings should not stop us.
If we insist we can get a good solution.
We have to get used to the feeling of being uncomfortable,
so we can continue looking for the best solution.
We must live in uncertainty,
because if we want everything perfect we will make mistakes and
often it is difficult for us to think outside the box.
Life is not always perfect in reality.
Only the boxes are perfectly predictable.
Page 93
The boxes stand for what I already know,
what I am used to,
what I feel comfortable with because I know it so well.
But to find a new way we have to start thinking outside the box.
No conflict can be solved from within.
We must go out to find solutions.
‘Think outside the box’ can be the solution.
Think differently.
We cannot keep on doing the same, if we want a change.
10.3.6. Exercise 6
Instructions:
The trainer asks the participants to think about this question:
If you were an object of this room, which one would you be and why?
Each participant thinks about this on his or her own.
Participants may take notes to remember.
After thinking about it,
those who want,
may explain the whole group which object they would be and why.
Purpose of the exercise:
It is another way to get to know what people like.
We get to know each other in a different way,
not from our professional role or
from our role as a person with learning difficulties.
This is also an unusual way to think about ourselves.
Page 94
10.3.7. Exercise 7
Instructions:
The trainer tells the participants to get together in pairs,
Each pair consists of a person A and a person B.
Each pair has 1 colored stick.
Each pair does the following:
1 person holds the stick with 1 finger on 1 end of the stick,
the other person holds the stick with 1 finger
on the other end of the stick.
The 1st time person A rules what happens with the stick and
person B follows.
Ruling can mean anything.
It can mean that the person does not move the stick at all;
That the persons only hold the stick.
It can also mean that the person moves the stick and tries to walk with it;
Just as the ruling person wants.
Then person B rules and person A follows.
The last time A and B co-ordinate without talking to each other.
They try to communicate what they want to do with the stick
without talking.
After the exercise the trainer reflects the impressions
with the participants.
Those participants who want talk about their experiences in front of the
whole group.
Purpose of the exercise and
relation to Person Centred Planning:
Who has the stick and rules in Person Centred Planning?
People with intellectual disabilities should rule
in Person Centred Planning, but this does not always happen.
Person Centred Planning is meant to accompany projects.
Page 95
It does not mean to direct them.
It should provide support and NOT show them the direction
where they should go to.
This is what 1 of the attendants in Spain said after the exercise:
‘In order to avoid the stick from falling I was pressing,
I ended up ruling, even though the other person should have ruled.’
This shows us that sometimes we take over
because we think must do it to prevent that something bad happens.
But actually this may not be what is needed.
10.3.8. Exercise 8
Instructions:
The trainer brings different tiles
and puts them in the middle of the group
on the floor.
Then the trainer asks the participants to choose a tile on the floor.
Each participant chooses his or her preferred tile.
Then each person thinks about 7 qualities of the chosen tile.
When they have thought about it
they may tell those 7 qualities to the whole group.
They should name 7 qualities of the chosen tile.
Purpose of the exercise:
If we focus our attention on something,
we begin to discover the qualities of something,
as the participants did with the tile on the floor.
If we do not focus our attention on something,
then many qualities will stay hidden.
Page 96
How do we focus our attention:
By concentrating on what we want to see.
By asking ourselves what it is what we are looking for.
If we put our attention to something,
for example the qualities of something,
we will end up finding it.
We can even find qualities in a floor tile.
How much easier must it then be to find qualities of a person?
If we find qualities of a floor tile by taking time,
maybe we can find new solutions if we take the time and focus on it?
10.3.9. Exercise 9
Instructions:
The trainer splits the whole group into 2 groups.
Most people are in the 1st group.
Only a few people are in the 2nd group.
People do not know which group they are in.
Only the trainer knows.
Then the trainer distributes 5 cards with disordered letters to each
participant.
The participants reveal 1 card after the other.
The trainer tells them when to reveal the next card.
The trainer has to prepare the cards before:
Every card has only 4 or 5 letters.
The letters of a card make a word if you put them into the right order.
The 2 groups have different letters and words except in the last round.
The 1st group gets letters where words can be built from.
The 2nd group gets letters where no words can be built from.
Except the last round, there both groups get the same letters.
Page 97
You may use these examples:
GROUP 1 GROUP 2:
Preo (rope) xyhi
Vole (love) pkoj
Kcrti (trick) lmaiq
Psotr (sport) ouxgz
Pehes (sheep) pehes (sheep)
The trainer tells the participants when the 1st round starts.
The participants reveal the 1st card and
try to build a word with the letters.
When 1 person has been able to build a word with his or her letters he or
she raises the hand without saying anything.
When the trainer sees that all participants of the 1st group have formed
the word,
he or she tells them to reveal the 2nd card and again try to build a word.
The trainer and the participants do the same for 5 rounds.
Purpose of the exercise:
Participants of group 2 cannot form any words because all the letters
make no sense,
except the last which is the same for the 2 groups.
But because participants of the 2nd group have made the experience
before,
where they could not form any word for 4 rounds,
they are incapable of forming the word sheep.
This exercise causes learnt helplessness,
makes participants unable to create,
to compose the final word.
After just a few minutes of not being able to create words,
the environmental situation has created this inability.
Page 98
Relation to Person Centred Planning:
If we transfer this to the lives of people with learning difficulties
this means:
What people expect from people with disabilities or learning difficulties
will determine much of the outcome.
Just think of all the things that can generate identity.
Created expectations should be adapted.
10.3.10. Exercise 10
Instructions:
The trainer has prepared cards with following example on it:
5 + 5+ 5 = 550
The trainer hands out a card to each participant.
Then the trainer asks the participants to try to make this result true by
just adding 1 line to the card.
Participants do this on their own.
When they have the result they may raise their hands.
The trainer may stop the exercise after a certain time
because it is probable that not all the participants will be able
to solve the exercise.
You can find the solution here.
Purpose of the exercise:
Creativity and to think out of the box should be promoted.
This exercise shows us that we have to think differently
to find new solutions.
We need to look at reality with other eyes to find opportunities.
Page 99
10.3.11. Exercise 11
Instructions:
The trainer asks the participants to introduce themselves now.
They must say their name and add a skill, taste or preference,
that makes them different to other people.
Each participant has to do this in front of the whole group.
After this the trainer explains:
When service providers and the people working there want to support
people with disabilities to live a ‘normal’ life
they have to concentrate on the relationship between community and
person with disability.
John ‘Brian says that there are 5 IMPORTANT ACCOMPLISHMENTS
that should be valid for everybody.
Service providers and people working there should support people
in claiming and realizing these rights for themselves
These are the 5 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Participate: this means the right to take part in community life and
spend leisure time with other members of the community;
Relationship: this means the right to experience valued relationships
with non-disabled people;
Choice: this means the right to make decisions themselves, about
how and where to live;
Competence: this means the right to learn new skills and
participate in different activities with the adequate assistance;
Respect: this means the right to be treated equal as all the others;
Page 100
After this explanation the trainer asks the participants to discuss in
the whole group:
What is it that people with learning difficulties contribute to?
What ‘added’ value do they contribute to community?
Here you can read some of the comments from the discussion in Spain:
Each person has his or her own qualities and that also applies to
people with learning difficulties.
People with physical disabilities never say ‘I will walk’ with the right
support.
But when we talk about people with learning difficulties,
even if we do not make it explicit,
the message that we give is that ‘with support the intellectual disability
will disappear’.
They can be ‘normal’ or
sometimes it is said that they might be ‘even better
than normal people’.
But why do they have to be normal?
Why do they have to become like others?
The others are not all the same either.
Also often this support is needed lifelong.
The message of all this seems wrong,
because it does not value that people are different.
Many times we think that support is only needed by
people with learning difficulties,
but we all need support.
The important thing here is that we have and need relationships.
After the discussion the trainer can talk about
the purpose of the exercise.
He or she can also summarize the conclusions of the discussion.
Page 101
Purpose of the exercise:
This exercise shows that ‘growth only comes from experience and
opportunities’.
If somebody does not get any opportunity
he or she cannot learn and grow.
He or she can also not show his or her qualities.
1 principle that may help that people like their life is
‘Making the desirable possible and the possible desirable’.
It can be a good way to support yourself and
others in living this principle.
10.3.12. Exercise 12
Instructions:
The trainer asks the participants to answer
the following questions in groups:
1. What are the most important things
that people with learning difficulties and their families need to learn
within the next 5 years?
2. What are the most important things for our community to learn
within the next 5 years?
3. Who is not involved in this process?
What do we think contributes to exclusion?
4. What is the risk we take in learning these things?
What do we lose?
What do we not need anymore?
Note: people might learn more if you build groups consisting of people
with a different background.
But how you build the groups is up to the trainer or the participants.
Page 102
Here are possible answers to some of the questions:
2nd question: What does our community need to learn over the next
5 years?
To value and to respect;
To listen;
Adapt environments;
Making information accessible;
Respect that some people need more,
some people need less time to do certain things;
To see people ‘as they are’;
To facilitate opportunities;
To train in rights;
To support people in the community;
To be modest;
To be and fight against what is wrong;
3rd question: Who is not involved in this process? What do we
think contributes to exclusion?
Debate about if administration and politicians are or should be
involved in the process.
It is believed that people with learning difficulties are not seen or not
known by many people of the community.
This also can contribute to exclusion;
Page 103
4th question: What is the risk we take to learn these things?
What do we lose?
What do we not need?
If we identify the risks, we will be able to act.
Fear of the unknown;
Fear of not being ready for the challenge.
A possible solution: Training.
We also fear that people do not want organizations as they are now,
that they fight for their rights.
A possible solution: Change.
What do we not need:
false respect, or people who say something
but do something else;
A possible solution: reflection.
10.4. Example: PATH
We found also a really good link to the method of ‘PATH’ on the internet.
We want to share this link with you.
Page 104
11. Dictionary
EPSA
Abbreviation of European Platform of Self-Advocates.
The European Platform of Self-Advocates is made up of organisations of
self-advocates from different countries in Europe.
We call it EPSA.
It is part of Inclusion Europe
evaluation
An evaluation is an examination of something.
It serves to get opinions from the participants
to find out what can be done better.
governmental
Anything governmental relates to a government,
which runs a city, state, or country.
graphic facilitation
Words are explained with drawings.
This means to explain something that is said or written with pictures or
graphics.
graphic facilitator
This is the person who does the drawings to explain words with pictures.
Page 105
guideline
A guideline is a rule-of-thumb or
suggestion that shows or tells you how to behave.
A guideline is not a rule.
If you want to stay healthy,
you might want to follow the government's dietary guidelines.
Sample guideline: go easy on the salt.
hearing loop
This is an assistive listening technology
for people with reduced ranges of hearing.
The hearing loop only can be used with a hearing aid in a certain area.
The benefit is that it allows the sound source of interest to be heard
clearly and free of other distracting noise in the environment.
inclusive
When something is inclusive it means
that it is particularly welcoming to all kinds of people.
InclUsion
Inclusion means that all kinds of people are welcome
and can be a part of society.
For example including someone in a training, a school,
a club or a team.
In this text inclusion is written with a capital U
because the U stands for theory U.
Theory U is very important for this project.
Page 106
inspire
When you inspire something, it is as if you are blowing air over a low
flame to make it grow.
A film can be inspired by a true story.
Studying for your test will inspire confidence in you.
Successful people often have a role model
who inspired them to greatness.
interpreter
An interpreter is someone who translates something
to make it understandable,
usually a foreign spoken language.
There are also interpreters that translate from spoken language in
sign language and the other way around.
They are called sign language interpreters.
Page 107
learning style
Everyone learns in a different style and
combines different learning styles.
There is no right or wrong style.
You can mix or switch learning styles.
Here you see the most common learning styles:
1. Visual:
You prefer using pictures and images.
2. Aural:
You prefer using sound and music.
3. Verbal:
You prefer using words, both in speech and writing.
4. Physical:
You prefer using your body, hands and sense of touch.
5. Logical:
You prefer using logic, reasoning and systems.
6. Social:
You prefer to learn in groups or with other people.
7. Solitary:
You prefer to work alone and use self-study.
method
A certain way of doing things,
especially a systematic way with a logical arrangement.
Person Centred Planning
This approach has been developed mainly in the English speaking
countries over the past 30 years to support people with disabilities
to life a self-determined life in the community.
Page 108
personal budget
How much money a person has to make a living.
Personal budget also means the money that
people with disabilities get to pay for the support that they need
or for anything else they want to spend it for.
This can for example be their living or leisure activities.
project
A project is a piece of work that is planned or intended.
A project always has a beginning and an end.
For example: If you plan to build a tree house
you can call it your tree house project.
promote
To contribute to the progress or growth of something.
For example:
If you promote a new product than
you tell people about the advantages of this product.
psychologist
A psychologist is a person who studies the mind.
A psychologist can for example do researches about mental disorders
and their treatments.
Or, a psychologist can be licensed to see and treat patients,
offering therapy for mental conditions or behavioral issues.
Page 109
reflect, reflection
Something that reflects comes back to you.
If you look in a mirror, you will see your reflected image or
your reflection.
If you reflect on your past experiences,
you look at them once again thoughtfully.
This is also called reflection.
If you reflect on yourself it is called self-reflection.
This means that you think about your own behaviour,
why you do something or why you feel about something in a certain way.
Self-advocate
Self-advocates are people with developmental disabilities,
also called cognitive or intellectual disabilities, and other disabilities.
These people with disabilities take control of their own lives,
including being in charge of their own care in the medical system.
This means that although persons with disabilities
that may call upon the support of others
are entitled to be in control of their own resources and
how these are directed.
It is about having the right to make life decisions without undue influence
or control by others.
setting
A setting is where something is placed.
tactile
Anything to do with the sense of touch
can be described as tactile.
Page 110
Theory U
Theory U shows us how we can change things in a different way
It is a method to create new ways.
You find more information about it here or here.
Recommended