View
55
Download
2
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
HAND Planning and Executing a Year 15 Exit Strategy. June 3, 2014. http://bit.ly/preservinghousingcredit. Nearly all the properties remained affordable and are owned by the same general partner or sponsor Majority are in good physical condition and have only limited immediate capital needs. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
HANDPlanning and Executing a Year 15 Exit
Strategy
June 3, 2014
3
• Nearly all the properties remained affordable and are owned by the same general partner or sponsor
• Majority are in good physical condition and have only limited immediate capital needs
4
5
6
KEY CHALLENGES
7
• Very limited financing choices exist throughout the extended use period for properties with modest recapitalization or capital improvement needs.
• Without innovative financial solutions and subsidies, these properties are in competition for limited Housing Credits and subsidy funding or will require owners to cover shortfalls.
8
Typical Partnership Purchase Option Provisions for Nonprofits
Right of First Refusal to Purchase Property: Price = debt + exit taxIssues:
• Price may exceed FMV• Reserves may not be included
Where property has “no value”, possibility to negotiate a simple assignment of LP interest for $1
Buyout of Limited Partner – Formula of FMV of Investor Partner’s Interest• Presumes liquidation of partnership assets: all reserves at risk of distribution• If investor partner interest had little value, property with little value has its challenges• Lender approval must be obtained and may have costs
9
As guardians of public investment, the leadership of public stakeholders
will be critical to the extended preservation of the Housing Credit
10
• Continued affordability and strong physical condition of the Housing Credit portfolio at Year 15 is a testament to the success of the program
• The challenge is how to maintain the quality and preserve these assets as they age
11
Some Successful Strategies
• Aggregating smaller properties to:• Portfolio reserves – Oakland allowed a nonprofit to pool reserves • For recapitalization and/or resyndication – allows for scale; states
promote 4% Housing Credits & Tax Exempt Bonds & may not allocate any 9% for resyndication
• Refinancing with friendly bank with low interest loan & Lender waived Prepayment Penalties to accommodate physical improvements, replenish reserves
• Public debt restructure or forgiveness – Portland gives consideration where affordability is continued & extended & allows for refinancing
• Access weatherization or other utility rebates/programs
• NYC program provides up to $15,000 /unit for extended affordability
12
Building on Preserving Housing Credit Investment: The State of Housing Credit Properties and Lessons learned for the Extended Use Period, Enterprise is working with the National Housing Trust to gather information on if/how state housing finance agencies are addressing Housing Credit properties that are reaching the end of their initial 15 year compliance period.
Some Preliminary Findings Include:
SURVEY OF STATE ALLOCATING AGENCIES
13
Most states have allocated 9% tax credits to properties that have already completed their initial 15 year compliance period
• VA and MD have awarded 9% Housing Credits• VA allocated 9% credits to 34 of 167 of these properties that have applied over the last 5 years • MD has awarded 9% credits to 2 such projects (unclear how many have applied)
14
Neither VA nor MD’s QAPs include incentives
Most state QAPs do not include incentives for resyndication of Housing Credit properties & applying for additional resources
15
• VA does provide incentives: • 15% set aside for qualified nonprofits (above the 10% required by the IRS)• Housing Credit projects selling to a nonprofit after 15 years receive 60 points• Housing Credit projects agreeing to 35 years extended use receive 50 points
• MD does not provide incentives
Most state QAPs do not provide incentives for non-for-profit developers committed to long term affordability.
16
• 4% credits and Private Activity Bonds (PABs)• VA: in the last 3 years, 15 of these projects have received 4% LIHTCs and PABs. • MD: in the last 5 years, 16 of these projects have received 4% LIHTCs and PABs.
• Weatherization or utility rebates • MD has used both
• “Additional resources/regulatory relief” • MD has:
• Extended terms/conditions of existing public debt • Relaxed regulations/covenants like income or special populations targeting or
rent covenants for distressed projects
17
QUALIFIED CONTRACTS
• VA has not had any experience with Qualified Contracts.
• MD has processed 2 requests for Qualified Contracts, but was unable to find an appropriate purchase in either case
• MD’s current QAP requires developers to waive their ability to request a Qualified Contract
18
Enterprise Follow Up
• Outreach: • Issue report of Enterprise & NHT survey of states• Webinars
• Tools – • Beyond Year 15: Preserving Housing Credit Projects & Portfolio: A
Guide for Nonprofits –Nancy Rase, Homes For Americahttp://www.enterprisecommunity.com/resources/ResourceDetails?ID=0091731
• Case Studies of Best Practices & Challenges• Projects/Portfolios by Owners Committed to Long Term Affordability• State & Local Housing Agencies
www.EnterpriseCommunity.org | www.EnterpriseCommunity.com
Lydia Tomltom@enterprisecommunity.org
212-284-7112
Recommended