Guest lecture ict_at_university

Preview:

Citation preview

ICT-integration in education:A multidimentional approach

Jo TondeurGhent University

University of Alcala:12 March 2013

Aim of the workshop (?)

• Focus on the multidimensional interaction of both teacher and school characteristics in developing a richerunderstanding of the complex process of ICT integration in education.

• Differential types of ICT use will be considered and how theyare related to variables such as teacher attitudes, educationalbeliefs, and school policies.

• We provide “good” practices and reflect about the participants own beliefs about education related to their useof technology, the development of an ICT policy plan, etc.

• For researchers the focus can be on the different research methods used.

IT’(s) about

Education!

Meet & greet

Educational technology?

TPACK workshop

Complex

innovationKnowledge

& beliefs

Evidence

Twitter #ICTalcala@jtondeur

Célestin Freinet

In Ghent

- Pédagogie du travail

-Tâtonnement expérimental

-Travail coopératif

- Complexe d'intérêt

- Methode naturelle

- Democracy

Freinet in the 21st century?

IT’(s) about

Education!

Meet & greet

Educational technology?

TPACK workshop

Complex

innovationKnowledge

& beliefs

Evidence

Technology?

Bron: http://www.apple.com/nl/education

EDUCATIONAL? TECHNOLOGY

For environmental learning?

To illustrate: Exploring the potential of tablets in education

#tablets360

Mobile (light)

Quick start

Wireless connection

Multimedia & Apps

Small

Characteristics (Looi et al., 2009; Oakley et

al., 2012)

Mobile and wireless communication technologies could play an important role in transforming the

ways in which we teach and learn

(Liu & Hwang, 2010)

◗ Help teachers in adapting instruction and facilitate richer interactions (Roschelle et al., 2007)

◗ Allow teachers and students to access and create multimedia materials (Oakley, Pegrum, Faulkner & Striepe, 2012)

◗ Learn in a multiplicity of (formal and informal) settings (Kearney et al., 2012)

◗ Contribute to the development of digital literacycompetences (e.g. Oakley, Pegrum, Faulkner & Striepe, 2012)

Create and

present

Search

information

Drill & practice Self-evaluation

Processing

content

What about architecture, engeneering, medicine?

Create & present

Self-evaluation

Use of a blog to provide information, to

communicate, to discuss, to dissiminate, etc.

New trends

Conclusion (1)

1. multidimensional approach to look at

ICT use in class

[More info: Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M.(2007). Towards a

typology of computer use in primary education. Journal of Computer

Assisted Learning, 23, 197-206]

Metaplan > green cardOpportunity

Technology? According to Koehler & Mishra, (2008): YES!

Metaplan: red card > difficulty

IT’(s) about

Education!

Meet & greet

Educational technology?

Institutional level

Knowledge & beliefs

Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (see Koehler & Mishra, 2008)

Voogt, J. Fisser, P. , Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J.& Van Braak, J. (2012). Technological

Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) - a review of the literature. Journal of

Computer Assisted Learning.

It’s not so much the program;

more what you do with it

[Jones, 1986]

Linking ICT use and educational beliefs

• ICT integration cannot be restricted to merely technology-related factors, such as computer attitudes(Albirini, 2006; Hermans et al. , 2008)

• Teachers more easily accept innovations that are in accordance with their educational beliefs (Ertmer, 2005)

• Constructivist beliefs foster computer use in education(e.g., Becker, 2001)

• Which teacher beliefs are connected to which types of computer use?

Teacher Beliefs Scale (Woolley, Benjamin, & Woolley , 2004)

•“I like to make curriculum choices for students because they can’t know what they need to learn.”

•“For assessment purposes, I’m interested in what students can do independently”

"Learning is not a spectator sport.

Students do not learn much just sitting in classes listening to teachers,

memorizing prepackaged assignments, and spitting out answers.

They must talk about what they are learning,

write reflectively about it, relate it to past

experiences, and apply it to their daily lives.

They must make what they learn part of themselves”

(Chickering & Gamson, 1987)

How active is your lecture?

Teacher Beliefs Scale (Woolley, Benjamin, & Woolley, 2004)

•“I believe that expanding on students’ ideas is an effective way to build my curriculum.”

•“I involve students in evaluating their own work and setting their own goals.”

•“I make it a priority in my course to give students time to work together when I am not directing them”

Traditionalism

C

on

stru

ctiv

ism

Cluster 1

Cluster 3Cluster 4

Cluster 2

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

Information Tool Learning Tool Basic Skills

Cluster 1: Constructivist &Traditional Teaching profile

Cluster 2: Constructivist Teaching profile

Cluster 3: Traditional Teaching profile

Cluster 4: Undefined profile

Conclusion (2)

1. multidimensional approach to look at

ICT use in class

2. IT’s about education

[More info:Tondeur, J., Hermans, R., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M.

(2008). Exploring the link between teachers educational beliefs

profiles and different types of computer use in the classroom: The

impact of teacher beliefs Computers in Human Behavior(24), 2541-

2553]

Twitter #ICTalcala@jtondeur

IT’(s) about

Education!

Meet & greet

Educational technology?

TPACK workshop

Complex

innovation

Knowledge & beliefs

Evidence

ICT & Education:

two worlds apart?

http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/key_data_series/129EN.pdf

Funding of ICT actions in education

1st 2nd 3th 4th 5th 6thGrade level

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00 Supportive use

of ICT

Class use

of ICT

To illustrate: 6 teachers in one school

Types of computer

use

Cultural teacher

characteristics

Structural teacher

characteristics

Cultural school

characteristics

Contextual school

characteristics

http://ugent.academia.edu/JoTondeur

Wikispaces

Twitter

1 6 11 16 21 26 31 36 41 46 51 56 62

Schoolnummer

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

Differences between institutions

Institutional characteristics?

Types of computer

use

Cultural teacher

characteristics

Structural teacher

characteristics

Cultural school

characteristics

Contextual school

characteristics

Basic

skills

Learning

tool

Information

tool

School characteristics

Availability of computers +++

Computers with Internet +++

Computers in the classroom ++ +++

Innovativeness ++ ++

ICT-policy ++ +++

ICT-training ++

Teacher characteristics

Gender +++

Computer experience ++

Traditionalism + + -

Constructivism + +++

Innovativeness + ++

+ p < .05 ++ p < .01 +++ p < .001

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Inno -

vativeness

Supportive

leadership

Goal -

orientedness

ICT

Planning

ICT

support

Infra -

structure

Cluster 1 (N=41)

Cluster 2 (N=27)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

1 2 3

Reeks1

Reeks2

1= Skills 2= Information tool 3= Learning tool

57

1. Students have a positive attitude towards ICT, and are willing to use ICT to support their own learning process.

2. Students use ICT in a safe, responsible and effective way.3. Students can work independently in a ICT enriched learning

environment.4. Students can learn independently in a ICT enriched learning

environment.5. Students can use ICT to elaborate their ideas in a creative way. 6. Students can use ICT to search for, process and store digital

information.7. Students can use ICT to present information to others.8. Students can use ICT to communicate in a safe, responsible and

effective way. 9. Students can chose adequately between a number of different ICT

applications, depending on the specific goal to be achieved. 10.Students are willing to redefine their actions after reflection on

their own and others’ use of ICT.

“Vision without action is a daydream.Action without vision is a nightmare.”

(Asian proverb)

Conclusion

1. multidimensional approach to look at

ICT use in class

2. IT’s about education

3. Need for a shared vision at

Institutional level

[More info:Tondeur, J., Van Keer, H., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M.

(2008). ICT integration in the classroom: challenging the potential

of a school policy. Computers and Education.51, 212-223.]

IT’(s) about

Education!

Meet & greet

Educational technology?

TPACK workshop

Complex

innovation

Knowledge & beliefs

Evidence

Are universities doing a better job because of their

embrace of technology?

Can universities improve their teaching effectiveness

by investing more heavily in technology?

How can universities best use technology?

Questions spring up on all sides.

“Although several evaluators found

educationally meaningful effects on

student achievement in reading, most

studies found only small effects in

this area.”

Meta-analysis

• Letterie (2003)

‣ Quality of the research questioned

• Is it possible to comme to a final conclusion about ICT in education?

‣ Dependent variables too diverse (scores, time, satisfaction, confidence, feasibility, …)

‣ Independent variables too diverse

‣ Contexts/conditions/audiences too diverse

Richard E. Mayer

Read this:

“When we pull the lever air can pass via the valve in the room between valce and air-valve. When we push the lever, the valve is shut closed and the air-valcve is pressed open so that air is pushed outside via the air-valveinto the tire.”

Read this text:

“When we pull the lever air can pass via the valve in the

room between valce and air-valve. When we push the lever,,

the valve is shut closed and the air-valcve is pressed open

so that air is pushed outside via the air-valve into the tire.”

When we pull

the lever,

Air passes

along the

valve

And air enters the room between

The valve and air-valve

When we push

the lever

The valve

closes

And air is pressed through the

air-valve to the tire.

Air-valve

Valve

lever

Microlevel: Information

component• General hypothesis:

ICT supports Information Processing

of Learners

Mayer (2001) and Paivio (1986)

Microlevel: Information

component• General hypothesis:

ICT supports Information Processing

of Learners

ICT fosters information presentation

• Practical relevance: imaging, virtual reality, 3D, CAVE-technologies

• Empirical base: convincing impact in variety of content domains (Mayer, 2003)

‣ Higher retention

‣ Better transfer of knowledge

74

Application of CAVE technology; walking in bone structure Kral (2004)

ICT fosters information organisation

• Higher education: processing large amounts of

complex and interrelated information.

• Information organisation implies structuring,

comparing, ordering, relating, and analysing of

new information.

76

Knowledge integration: games

• Howell (2005) - overview of ICT-based interactive games and evaluative research; some relevant for (para)medical education

• Mann, Eidelson, Fukuchi, Nissman, Robertson, & Jardines (2002) - computer assisted board game to manage patients with breast cancer. Students send the patient to physical examination, mammography, ultrasound, or office procedures, … : significantlearning gains about work-up procedures.

79

Screendump from the Breast Cancer Detective Game

(http://www.med.umich.edu/lrc/breastcancerdetective/)

Conclusions

• Relevance of ICT in medical education should consider the expected outcomes, context, conditions and target audience

• Is ICT effective? Wrong question‣ (Jacobsen, 2001) The major question is now: under what circumstances, in what particular learning environment, with what type of students and in view of what kind of learning tasks, does ICT have an impact?

• ICT impact positive IF …‣ Combined with real life experiences

‣ Sufficient prior knowledge available

‣ Novice or advanced student

‣ Staff development

• Most convincing impact: ‣ Microlevel: collaborative learning

‣ Mesolevel: flexibility

NMC Horizon Project

IT’(s) about

Education!

Meet & greet

Educational technology?

TPACK workshop

Complex

innovation

Knowledge & beliefs

Evidence

Interactive @ workshop?

•Do you tweet about the workshop?

•Do you share info @ the educational portal?

•Do you try Facebook?

•Are you on Academia now?

•Did you visit the website of out department?

•Did you sent an e-mail about the workshop?

•Some more interesting videos on you tube?

•Perhaps you can create a blog post?

•Do you want to develop a mindmap?

•Do you want to explore Turning Point?

• Scoop It!

•Do you like to explore a tablet?

•Create a Prezi?

Papers ?

Information ?

Jo.Tondeur@UGent.be

Ruben.Vanderlinde@UGent.behttp://ugent.academia.edu/JoTondeur

http://ugent.academia.edu/JoTondeur