Graph Colouring The Team : Aymen Dammak Sébastien Jagueneau Florian Lajus Xavier Loubatier Cyril...

1

Graph ColouringThe Team :

Aymen DammakSébastien Jagueneau

Florian LajusXavier Loubatier

Cyril RayotMathieu Rey

Mentor :Paul-Yves Gloess

2

First DefinitionsA graph is a set of vertices linked by edges

A graph

3

NeighboursA vertex is a neighbour of another vertex if

they are linked by an edge

4

Colouring NotionsA colour is associated to each vertexA graph is well-coloured if no neighbouring

vertices share the same colour

A well-coloured graph

5

Degree NotionsThe vertex degree is the number of

neighbours of this vertexThe graph degree is the maximum degree of

its vertices

The Theorem• Choose randomly a vertex H which has all its neighbours well-coloured• Choose randomly a color C unused by theneighbours of H• Color H with C and graph is still well-coloured

What is PVS ?PVS : Prototype Verification SystemProof assistant SRI international

Divide and ConquerType Checking -> TCC : Type Correctness

ConditionCorrections

Definition of degreeGraph non oriented

After correction, 3 TCCs required to be provedColoring_vertex_TCC1Coloring_vertex_TCC2Coloring_TCC5

9

Proof of coloring_vertex_tcc1Main idea :

nonempty (difference (below (1+degree (R)), image (f, neighbours (R) (t)))

below (1+degree (R)): N+1 colours of the graphimage (f, neighbours (R) (t)): colours of t neighbours

The set of colours used to colour the neighbours of vertex T, can not

include all the graph colours.

10

Proof of coloring_vertex_tcc1

Graph colours:

11

Proof of coloring_vertex_tcc1

Colours of vertex V neighbours:

There is always a colour left for vertex V, different from the colours of its neighbours.

12

Proof of coloring_vertex_tcc1Proof idea:

If a set has more elements than another one, the difference between these two sets is not empty.

The notion of cardinalityThree new lemmas to prove the tcc1

13

Proof of coloring_vertex_tcc1

Encountered problems:Not acquainted with the PVS syntaxToo strong hypothesis in one of the three

lemmasnot easy to prove

14

Proof of coloring_vertex_tcc2Main idea :

a well coloured  graph can be created by adding a coloured vertex to a well coloured graph.

15

Proof of coloring_vertex_tcc2A well-coloured graph

16

Proof of coloring_vertex_tcc2A vertex is selected

17

Proof of coloring_vertex_tcc2An unused colour is selected

18

Proof of coloring_vertex_tcc2The coloured vertex is added to the well-

coloured graph

19

Proof of coloring_vertex_tcc2Two steps :

Modification of the colouring function.

Modification of the well-coloured graph.

20

Proof of coloring_tcc5Main idea :

Set “S” representing the vertices (coloured or not) of a graph

Strict subset “s” of the set (coloured vertices)An element “x” not part of the subset (vertex

about to be coloured)The number of vertices to be coloured is

always decreasing

21

Proof of coloring_tcc5A subset, a strict subset and an elementYellow area : vertices remaining uncoloured

X

22

Proof of coloring_tcc5Adding the element to the subsetYellow area becomes the green one

X

23

Proof of coloring_tcc5Green area strict subset of the yellow area

XX

24

Proof Result

In order to compare: last year, at the end of their project, they had 36 proved and 6 unproved lemmas with 11 TCCs for a total of nearly 21 seconds.

25

ConclusionProofs are completeUsing PVS

Think whether what we are writing is correct and why

Step by step correctionMathematical logic

Finishing the project

26

Thanks for your attention