View
4
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Pitfalls of Rules of Thumb
in
Geothermal Heat Pump Design
Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down?
Andrew Chiasson, Ph.D., P.E.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
University of Dayton
ASHRAE Dayton Chapter MeetingFeb. 8, 2010 ASHRAE
Technology for a Better Environment
Presentation Outline
• What is the most prevalent rule of thumb in the geothermal heat pump industry? ft/ton
ft/ton
W/m (in other countries)
• The challenges in defining such a rule of thumb
• Results of a parametric study demonstrating the difficulties of a meaningful rule of thumb
• Concluding summary
Ground Heat Exchanger DesignImportant Parameters
Heat Gains and Losses (Peak Hour and
Annual)
Average
Thermal
Conductivity
Undisturbed
Earth
Temperature
BoreholeThermal Resistance
or
Borehole
Spacing
Is a ft/ton Rule of Thumb Possible?“ft” means feet of What?
• In vertical systems, is the borehole: 4.5, 5, 6 inch diameter?
Grouted with standard bentonite or thermally-enhanced grout?
• What is the borehole-to-borehole spacing?
• What about the u-tube? U-tube spacers specified?
¾, 1, or 1¼ inch u-tube diameter?
Double u-tube?
Concentric tube?
Is a ft/ton Rule of Thumb Possible?“ft” means feet of What?
• Soil or rock thermal properties: Dry volcanic ash vs. moist sand vs. dense rock?
• What is the ground temperature?! Difference between this and the design heat pump entering
fluid strongly affects the loop length
Is a ft/ton Rule of Thumb Possible?“/ton” means tons of What?
• What is the heat pump COP? High, medium, or low efficiency?
The building load is NOT the same as the ground load
• What is the heat pump run time? Primary residence vs. cottage?
Multiple zones: are some zones mostly unoccupied (basement, guest rooms)?
Additional loads of a swimming pool, spa, etc.?
De-superheater?
Two-stage compressor?
Additional runtimes affect ground thermal storage, which affects loop lengths
Is a ft/ton Rule of Thumb Possible?Where did such a rule of thumb originate?
• In the residential sector in Central OK, where some original work in this field was done (late 1970s -1980s)
• The rule of thumb was meant to relate total ground heat exchanger length to the installed capacity of the heat pump (which was usually closely-matched to the cooling load)
• The rule of thumb was adequate for residential buildings in that area where regional geologic conditions are similar
Ground Heat Exchanger (GHX) Design
• Usual formulation: size ground heat exchanger so that it does not exceed design limits on entering fluid temperature to the heat pumps over the life of the system.
• Alternative formulation: adjust loads on ground heat exchanger to reduce required size.
• Optimization for energy performance beyond these two formulations is rare.
Ground Heat Exchanger (GHX) DesignHeating vs. Cooling Constrained
32
36
39
43
46
50
54
57
61
64
68
72
75
79
82
86
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Min
. H
eat
Pu
mp
En
teri
ng
Flu
id T
em
pera
ture
(o
F)
Peak H
eat
Pu
mp
En
teri
ng
Flu
id T
em
pera
ture
(oC
)
Time (years)
A Heating-Constrained GHX
Ground Heat Exchanger (GHX) DesignHeating vs. Cooling Constrained
59
63
66
70
73
77
81
84
88
91
15
17
19
21
23
25
27
29
31
33
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Max. H
eat
Pu
mp
En
teri
ng
Flu
id T
em
pera
ture
(o
F)
Max. H
eat
Pu
mp
En
teri
ng
Flu
id T
em
pera
ture
(o
C)
Time (years)
A Cooling-Constrained GHX
Ground Heat Exchanger (GHX) DesignHeating vs. Cooling Constrained
Previous bldg. with a hybrid cooling tower. Is GHX still cooling-constrained?
43
46
50
54
57
61
64
68
72
75
79
82
86
90
93
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30
Peak H
eat
Pu
mp
En
teri
ng
Flu
id T
em
pera
ture
(oF
)
Peak H
eat
Pu
mp
En
teri
ng
Flu
id T
em
pera
ture
(oC
)
Time (years)
Hybrid Cooling Tower Case Annual Peak Temperatures
Ground Heat Exchanger DesignSome Challenges
• Long time constant of the ground requires two load calculation/design cycles: Daily peak
Annual (extrapolated to multiple years)
• Former used for sizing equipment.
• Both are used for sizing ground heat exchanger.
• Latter is an extra step for most designers of HVAC systems.
• The desire to eliminate the extra step leads to the search for a rule-of-thumb that correlates ground heat exchanger design to peak load.
Ground Heat Exchanger DesignRules of Thumb
• Usually expressed as : Feet of borehole per ton of heat pump capacity,
W peak heat rejection (or extraction) per meter of borehole length, or
Btu/hr peak heat rejection (or extraction) per foot of borehole length
• Neither take into account long-term heat build-up or depletion
• Proving a specific rule-of-thumb is bad: easy
• Proving that no rules-of-thumb are possible: not-so-easy
In Search of a General Rule of Thumb:Parametric Study (Spitler & Cullin, 2008)
• 14 U.S. Locations (in DOE climate zones)
• 3 buildings: office, school, hotel
• Typical design heat pump entering fluid temperature limits Heating-constrained or cooling-constrained
• Experimentally-validated simulation tools
• All have same ground thermal conductivity, same borehole completion
• Building loads and undisturbed ground temperatures depend on location
• Sizes adjusted to meet limits over ten-year period
• Express results in heat rejection or heat extraction per unit length (W/m)
In Search of a General Rule of Thumb:Parametric Study Results
Subset of Results:
Location Bldg. Peak Ht. Rej. Rate (W/m)
Peak Ht. Extr. Rate (W/m)
Chicago, Office 79 36 Illinois School 16 52 Hotel 79 37 Duluth, Office 78 48 Minnesota School 8 38 Hotel 42 26 Houston, Office 67 9 Texas School 46 99 Hotel 26 7
In Search of a General Rule of Thumb:Parametric Study Results
Which rule of thumb would you choose?
Black line represents freezing point of 20% eth.glycol, -7.82C
In Search of a General Rule of Thumb:Parametric Study Results
Which rule of thumb would you choose?
In Search of a General Rule of Thumb:Parametric Study Results
Effects of choosing different design conditions
Peak Heat Extraction Rate (W/m)Chicago Office Building
0
10
20
30
40
50
-5 0 5 10
Minimum HP EFT ( C)
Pe
ak
Ra
te (
W/m
)
• Notice that the GHX for this building is cooling-constrained if the design minimum EFT were chosen to be 2 C or less
• However, if the EFT were chosen greater than 2 C (or if a shorter amount of GHX {less than 40 W/m} were installed, then the GHX switches to heating constrained
Peak Heat Extraction Rate (W/m)Chicago Office Building
40
50
60
70
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Grout Conductivity (W/m K)
Pe
ak
Ra
te (
W/m
)
In Search of a General Rule of Thumb:Parametric Study Results
Effects of different borehole designs
In Search of a General Rule of Thumb:Parametric Study Results
Required Ground Heat Exchanger Sizes
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35
Ranking
W/m
Concluding Summary
• Commercial GSHP systems require two load calculation/design cycles - design day and annual.
• Rules-of-thumb are inherently problematic.
• Alternative:
Annual load calculation
In situ thermal conductivity testing
Simulation-based design
Acknowledgements
• Thanks to Jeffrey D. Spitler, Ph.D., P.E.,C.M. Leonard Professor, Oklahoma State University
• Spitler, J.D., and J. Cullin. 2008. Misconceptions Regarding Design of Ground-source Heat Pump Systems. Proceedings of the World Renewable Energy Congress, July 20-25, Glasgow, Scotland.
Recommended