Geodesic flows on quotients of Bruhat-Tits buildings - and ... · Geodesic flows on quotients of...

Preview:

Citation preview

Geodesic flows on quotients of Bruhat-Titsbuildings

and Number Theory

Anish Ghosh

University of East Anglia

joint with J. Athreya (Urbana) and A. Prasad (Chennai)

1 / 127

Diagonal Actions

Recurrence

Buildings

Shrinking Targets

2 / 127

Diagonal Actions

Recurrence

Buildings

Shrinking Targets

3 / 127

Diagonal Actions

Recurrence

Buildings

Shrinking Targets

4 / 127

Diagonal Actions

Recurrence

Buildings

Shrinking Targets

5 / 127

Shrinking

Target

Problems

0− 1 laws

Return time asymptotics

Heirarchy

6 / 127

Shrinking

Target

Problems

0− 1 laws

Return time asymptotics

Heirarchy

7 / 127

Shrinking

Target

Problems

0− 1 laws

Return time asymptotics

Heirarchy

8 / 127

Shrinking

Target

Problems

0− 1 laws

Return time asymptotics

Heirarchy

9 / 127

Shrinking

Target

Problems

0− 1 laws

Return time asymptotics

Heirarchy

10 / 127

Shrinking

Target

Problems

0− 1 laws

Return time asymptotics

Heirarchy

11 / 127

Excursions in hyperbolic 3 manifolds

12 / 127

Sullivan (1982)

Y = Hk+1/Γ, y0 ∈ Y , {rt} a sequence of real numbers

For any y ∈ Y and almost every ξ ∈ Ty (Y ) there are infinitely manyt ∈ N such that

dist(y0, γt(y , ξ)) ≥ rt

if and only if

∞∑t=1

e−krt =∞

13 / 127

Sullivan (1982)

Y = Hk+1/Γ, y0 ∈ Y , {rt} a sequence of real numbers

For any y ∈ Y and almost every ξ ∈ Ty (Y ) there are infinitely manyt ∈ N such that

dist(y0, γt(y , ξ)) ≥ rt

if and only if

∞∑t=1

e−krt =∞

14 / 127

Sullivan (1982)

Y = Hk+1/Γ, y0 ∈ Y , {rt} a sequence of real numbers

For any y ∈ Y and almost every ξ ∈ Ty (Y ) there are infinitely manyt ∈ N such that

dist(y0, γt(y , ξ)) ≥ rt

if and only if

∞∑t=1

e−krt =∞

15 / 127

Logarithm Laws

Corollary

For almost every y ∈ Y and almost all ξ ∈ Ty (Y )

lim supt→∞

dist(y , γt(y , ξ))

log t=

1

k

16 / 127

Some Number theory

For almost every z , there exist infinitely many pairs (p, q) ∈ O(√−d)

such that

|z − p

q| < ψ(|q|)

|q|2and (p, q) = O(

√−d)

if and only if∞∑t=1

ψ(t)

t2=∞

17 / 127

Some Number theory

For almost every z , there exist infinitely many pairs (p, q) ∈ O(√−d)

such that

|z − p

q| < ψ(|q|)

|q|2and (p, q) = O(

√−d)

if and only if∞∑t=1

ψ(t)

t2=∞

18 / 127

Sullivan’s strategy

Use the mixing property of the geodesic flow (in the tradition ofMargulis)

Along with geometric arguments

To force quasi-independence

And then apply the Borel-Cantelli Lemma

19 / 127

Sullivan’s strategy

Use the mixing property of the geodesic flow (in the tradition ofMargulis)

Along with geometric arguments

To force quasi-independence

And then apply the Borel-Cantelli Lemma

20 / 127

Sullivan’s strategy

Use the mixing property of the geodesic flow (in the tradition ofMargulis)

Along with geometric arguments

To force quasi-independence

And then apply the Borel-Cantelli Lemma

21 / 127

Sullivan’s strategy

Use the mixing property of the geodesic flow (in the tradition ofMargulis)

Along with geometric arguments

To force quasi-independence

And then apply the Borel-Cantelli Lemma

22 / 127

Kleinbock-Margulis (1999)

Generalized Sullivan’s results

G semisimple Lie group, K maximal compact subgroup, Γnon-uniform lattice

Y = K\G/Γ a locally symmetric space

Logarithm laws for locally symmetric spaces

23 / 127

Kleinbock-Margulis (1999)

Generalized Sullivan’s results

G semisimple Lie group, K maximal compact subgroup, Γnon-uniform lattice

Y = K\G/Γ a locally symmetric space

Logarithm laws for locally symmetric spaces

24 / 127

Kleinbock-Margulis (1999)

Generalized Sullivan’s results

G semisimple Lie group, K maximal compact subgroup, Γnon-uniform lattice

Y = K\G/Γ a locally symmetric space

Logarithm laws for locally symmetric spaces

25 / 127

Kleinbock-Margulis (1999)

Generalized Sullivan’s results

G semisimple Lie group, K maximal compact subgroup, Γnon-uniform lattice

Y = K\G/Γ a locally symmetric space

Logarithm laws for locally symmetric spaces

26 / 127

Khintchine-Groshev Theorem

For almost all A ∈ Matm×n(R), there exist infinitely manyq ∈ Zn,p ∈ Zm such that

‖Aq + p‖m < ψ(‖q‖n)

if and only if

∞∑t=1

ψ(t) =∞

If time permits

More general multiplicative results

27 / 127

Khintchine-Groshev Theorem

For almost all A ∈ Matm×n(R), there exist infinitely manyq ∈ Zn,p ∈ Zm such that

‖Aq + p‖m < ψ(‖q‖n)

if and only if

∞∑t=1

ψ(t) =∞

If time permits

More general multiplicative results

28 / 127

Khintchine-Groshev Theorem

For almost all A ∈ Matm×n(R), there exist infinitely manyq ∈ Zn,p ∈ Zm such that

‖Aq + p‖m < ψ(‖q‖n)

if and only if

∞∑t=1

ψ(t) =∞

If time permits

More general multiplicative results

29 / 127

SLn(R)/ SLn(Z) can be identified with the space Xn of unimodularlattices in Rn

Mahler’s compactness criterion describes compact subsets of Xn

The systole of a lattice

s(Λ) := minv∈Λ‖v‖

30 / 127

SLn(R)/ SLn(Z) can be identified with the space Xn of unimodularlattices in Rn

Mahler’s compactness criterion describes compact subsets of Xn

The systole of a lattice

s(Λ) := minv∈Λ‖v‖

31 / 127

SLn(R)/ SLn(Z) can be identified with the space Xn of unimodularlattices in Rn

Mahler’s compactness criterion describes compact subsets of Xn

The systole of a lattice

s(Λ) := minv∈Λ‖v‖

32 / 127

Dani Correspondence

x ! ux :=

(1 x0 1

)

gt :=

(et 00 e−t

)

Read Diophantine properties of x from the gt (semi) orbits of uxZ2

For example, x is badly approximable if and only if the orbit of uxZ2

is bounded

33 / 127

Dani Correspondence

x ! ux :=

(1 x0 1

)

gt :=

(et 00 e−t

)

Read Diophantine properties of x from the gt (semi) orbits of uxZ2

For example, x is badly approximable if and only if the orbit of uxZ2

is bounded

34 / 127

Dani Correspondence

x ! ux :=

(1 x0 1

)

gt :=

(et 00 e−t

)

Read Diophantine properties of x from the gt (semi) orbits of uxZ2

For example, x is badly approximable if and only if the orbit of uxZ2

is bounded

35 / 127

Dani Correspondence

x ! ux :=

(1 x0 1

)

gt :=

(et 00 e−t

)

Read Diophantine properties of x from the gt (semi) orbits of uxZ2

For example, x is badly approximable if and only if the orbit of uxZ2

is bounded

36 / 127

More generally

There are infinitely many solutions to

|qx + p| < ψ(q)

if and only if there are infinitely many t > 0 such that

s(gtuxZ2) ≤ r(t)

37 / 127

More generally

There are infinitely many solutions to

|qx + p| < ψ(q)

if and only if there are infinitely many t > 0 such that

s(gtuxZ2) ≤ r(t)

38 / 127

r(t) defines the complement Xn(t) of a compact set

Shrinking systolic neighborhoods

If r(t)→ 0 very fast we should expect few solutions

The speed is governed by convergence of

∞∑t=0

vol(Xn(t))

39 / 127

r(t) defines the complement Xn(t) of a compact set

Shrinking systolic neighborhoods

If r(t)→ 0 very fast we should expect few solutions

The speed is governed by convergence of

∞∑t=0

vol(Xn(t))

40 / 127

r(t) defines the complement Xn(t) of a compact set

Shrinking systolic neighborhoods

If r(t)→ 0 very fast we should expect few solutions

The speed is governed by convergence of

∞∑t=0

vol(Xn(t))

41 / 127

r(t) defines the complement Xn(t) of a compact set

Shrinking systolic neighborhoods

If r(t)→ 0 very fast we should expect few solutions

The speed is governed by convergence of

∞∑t=0

vol(Xn(t))

42 / 127

Similar story for logarithm laws

Model geodesic flow on T 1(K\G/Γ) by the action of diagonalone-parameter subgroups on G/Γ

Compute vol({x ∈ G/Γ : d(x0, gtx) ≥ r(t)})

Use quantitative mixing, i.e. effective decay of matrix coefficients forautomorphic representation

For φ, ψ ∈ L2(G/Γ), and g ∈ G

|〈gφ, ψ〉| � L2l (φ)L2

l (ψ)H(g)−λ

To force quasi-independence on average

43 / 127

Similar story for logarithm laws

Model geodesic flow on T 1(K\G/Γ) by the action of diagonalone-parameter subgroups on G/Γ

Compute vol({x ∈ G/Γ : d(x0, gtx) ≥ r(t)})

Use quantitative mixing, i.e. effective decay of matrix coefficients forautomorphic representation

For φ, ψ ∈ L2(G/Γ), and g ∈ G

|〈gφ, ψ〉| � L2l (φ)L2

l (ψ)H(g)−λ

To force quasi-independence on average

44 / 127

Similar story for logarithm laws

Model geodesic flow on T 1(K\G/Γ) by the action of diagonalone-parameter subgroups on G/Γ

Compute vol({x ∈ G/Γ : d(x0, gtx) ≥ r(t)})

Use quantitative mixing, i.e. effective decay of matrix coefficients forautomorphic representation

For φ, ψ ∈ L2(G/Γ), and g ∈ G

|〈gφ, ψ〉| � L2l (φ)L2

l (ψ)H(g)−λ

To force quasi-independence on average

45 / 127

Similar story for logarithm laws

Model geodesic flow on T 1(K\G/Γ) by the action of diagonalone-parameter subgroups on G/Γ

Compute vol({x ∈ G/Γ : d(x0, gtx) ≥ r(t)})

Use quantitative mixing, i.e. effective decay of matrix coefficients forautomorphic representation

For φ, ψ ∈ L2(G/Γ), and g ∈ G

|〈gφ, ψ〉| � L2l (φ)L2

l (ψ)H(g)−λ

To force quasi-independence on average

46 / 127

Similar story for logarithm laws

Model geodesic flow on T 1(K\G/Γ) by the action of diagonalone-parameter subgroups on G/Γ

Compute vol({x ∈ G/Γ : d(x0, gtx) ≥ r(t)})

Use quantitative mixing, i.e. effective decay of matrix coefficients forautomorphic representation

For φ, ψ ∈ L2(G/Γ), and g ∈ G

|〈gφ, ψ〉| � L2l (φ)L2

l (ψ)H(g)−λ

To force quasi-independence on average

47 / 127

Similar story for logarithm laws

Model geodesic flow on T 1(K\G/Γ) by the action of diagonalone-parameter subgroups on G/Γ

Compute vol({x ∈ G/Γ : d(x0, gtx) ≥ r(t)})

Use quantitative mixing, i.e. effective decay of matrix coefficients forautomorphic representation

For φ, ψ ∈ L2(G/Γ), and g ∈ G

|〈gφ, ψ〉| � L2l (φ)L2

l (ψ)H(g)−λ

To force quasi-independence on average

48 / 127

Much recent activity

Maucourant, Hersonsky-Paulin, Parkonnen-Paulin, Chaika

Nogueira, Laurent-Nogueira, G-Gorodnik-Nevo

49 / 127

Much recent activity

Maucourant, Hersonsky-Paulin, Parkonnen-Paulin, Chaika

Nogueira, Laurent-Nogueira, G-Gorodnik-Nevo

50 / 127

Much recent activity

Maucourant, Hersonsky-Paulin, Parkonnen-Paulin, Chaika

Nogueira, Laurent-Nogueira, G-Gorodnik-Nevo

51 / 127

Key technical point

In order to apply decay of matrix coefficients we have to smoothencusp neighborhoods

And use suitable Sobolev norms

This destroys sensitive information about exponents

Which is crucial in G-Gorodnik-Nevo

52 / 127

Key technical point

In order to apply decay of matrix coefficients we have to smoothencusp neighborhoods

And use suitable Sobolev norms

This destroys sensitive information about exponents

Which is crucial in G-Gorodnik-Nevo

53 / 127

Key technical point

In order to apply decay of matrix coefficients we have to smoothencusp neighborhoods

And use suitable Sobolev norms

This destroys sensitive information about exponents

Which is crucial in G-Gorodnik-Nevo

54 / 127

Key technical point

In order to apply decay of matrix coefficients we have to smoothencusp neighborhoods

And use suitable Sobolev norms

This destroys sensitive information about exponents

Which is crucial in G-Gorodnik-Nevo

55 / 127

Volume estimates

Γ arithmetic lattice in G , S Siegel set for Γ in G

dist metric on G , ¯dist metric on G/Γ defined by

¯dist(gΓ, hΓ) := infγ∈Γ{dist(gγ, h) : γ ∈ Γ}

Coarse isometry (Leuzinger + Ji)

¯dist(gΓ, hΓ) ≤ dist(g , h) ≤ ¯dist(gΓ, hΓ) + C

For g , h ∈ S

56 / 127

Volume estimates

Γ arithmetic lattice in G , S Siegel set for Γ in G

dist metric on G , ¯dist metric on G/Γ defined by

¯dist(gΓ, hΓ) := infγ∈Γ{dist(gγ, h) : γ ∈ Γ}

Coarse isometry (Leuzinger + Ji)

¯dist(gΓ, hΓ) ≤ dist(g , h) ≤ ¯dist(gΓ, hΓ) + C

For g , h ∈ S

57 / 127

Volume estimates

Γ arithmetic lattice in G , S Siegel set for Γ in G

dist metric on G , ¯dist metric on G/Γ defined by

¯dist(gΓ, hΓ) := infγ∈Γ{dist(gγ, h) : γ ∈ Γ}

Coarse isometry (Leuzinger + Ji)

¯dist(gΓ, hΓ) ≤ dist(g , h) ≤ ¯dist(gΓ, hΓ) + C

For g , h ∈ S

58 / 127

Volume estimates

Γ arithmetic lattice in G , S Siegel set for Γ in G

dist metric on G , ¯dist metric on G/Γ defined by

¯dist(gΓ, hΓ) := infγ∈Γ{dist(gγ, h) : γ ∈ Γ}

Coarse isometry (Leuzinger + Ji)

¯dist(gΓ, hΓ) ≤ dist(g , h) ≤ ¯dist(gΓ, hΓ) + C

For g , h ∈ S

59 / 127

Trees and Buildings

If G is a p-adic Lie group then

The analogue of a symmetric space is a Bruhat-Tits building

Example from Shahar Mozes’ talk

G = PGL2(Qp)× PGL2(Qq)

Γ a co-compact lattice coming from a quaternion algebra

X/Γ is a finite graph

In fact, any lattice in a p-adic Lie group is necessarily cocompact(Tamagawa)

60 / 127

Trees and Buildings

If G is a p-adic Lie group then

The analogue of a symmetric space is a Bruhat-Tits building

Example from Shahar Mozes’ talk

G = PGL2(Qp)× PGL2(Qq)

Γ a co-compact lattice coming from a quaternion algebra

X/Γ is a finite graph

In fact, any lattice in a p-adic Lie group is necessarily cocompact(Tamagawa)

61 / 127

Trees and Buildings

If G is a p-adic Lie group then

The analogue of a symmetric space is a Bruhat-Tits building

Example from Shahar Mozes’ talk

G = PGL2(Qp)× PGL2(Qq)

Γ a co-compact lattice coming from a quaternion algebra

X/Γ is a finite graph

In fact, any lattice in a p-adic Lie group is necessarily cocompact(Tamagawa)

62 / 127

Trees and Buildings

If G is a p-adic Lie group then

The analogue of a symmetric space is a Bruhat-Tits building

Example from Shahar Mozes’ talk

G = PGL2(Qp)× PGL2(Qq)

Γ a co-compact lattice coming from a quaternion algebra

X/Γ is a finite graph

In fact, any lattice in a p-adic Lie group is necessarily cocompact(Tamagawa)

63 / 127

Trees and Buildings

If G is a p-adic Lie group then

The analogue of a symmetric space is a Bruhat-Tits building

Example from Shahar Mozes’ talk

G = PGL2(Qp)× PGL2(Qq)

Γ a co-compact lattice coming from a quaternion algebra

X/Γ is a finite graph

In fact, any lattice in a p-adic Lie group is necessarily cocompact(Tamagawa)

64 / 127

Trees and Buildings

If G is a p-adic Lie group then

The analogue of a symmetric space is a Bruhat-Tits building

Example from Shahar Mozes’ talk

G = PGL2(Qp)× PGL2(Qq)

Γ a co-compact lattice coming from a quaternion algebra

X/Γ is a finite graph

In fact, any lattice in a p-adic Lie group is necessarily cocompact(Tamagawa)

65 / 127

Trees and Buildings

If G is a p-adic Lie group then

The analogue of a symmetric space is a Bruhat-Tits building

Example from Shahar Mozes’ talk

G = PGL2(Qp)× PGL2(Qq)

Γ a co-compact lattice coming from a quaternion algebra

X/Γ is a finite graph

In fact, any lattice in a p-adic Lie group is necessarily cocompact(Tamagawa)

66 / 127

Trees and Buildings

However, we could consider G = PGL2(Fp((t)))× PGL2(Fp((t−1)))

And Γ = PGL2(Fp[t, t−1])

Which turns out to be a non-uniform lattice in G

67 / 127

Trees and Buildings

However, we could consider G = PGL2(Fp((t)))× PGL2(Fp((t−1)))

And Γ = PGL2(Fp[t, t−1])

Which turns out to be a non-uniform lattice in G

68 / 127

Trees and Buildings

However, we could consider G = PGL2(Fp((t)))× PGL2(Fp((t−1)))

And Γ = PGL2(Fp[t, t−1])

Which turns out to be a non-uniform lattice in G

69 / 127

Trees and Buildings

The Tree of SL2(F2((X−1)))

70 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Ultrametric logarithm laws

So it makes sense to investigate analogues of logarithm laws for

The graph K\G/Γ where G is an algebraic group

Defined over a totally disconnected field

K is a compact open subgroup and Γ is a lattice in G

71 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Ultrametric logarithm laws

So it makes sense to investigate analogues of logarithm laws for

The graph K\G/Γ where G is an algebraic group

Defined over a totally disconnected field

K is a compact open subgroup and Γ is a lattice in G

72 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Ultrametric logarithm laws

So it makes sense to investigate analogues of logarithm laws for

The graph K\G/Γ where G is an algebraic group

Defined over a totally disconnected field

K is a compact open subgroup and Γ is a lattice in G

73 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Ultrametric logarithm laws

So it makes sense to investigate analogues of logarithm laws for

The graph K\G/Γ where G is an algebraic group

Defined over a totally disconnected field

K is a compact open subgroup and Γ is a lattice in G

74 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Local fields of positive characteristic

Fp - finite field

Fp[X ] ! Z

Fp(X ) ! Q

Fp((X−1)) ! R

75 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Local fields of positive characteristic

Fp - finite field

Fp[X ] ! Z

Fp(X ) ! Q

Fp((X−1)) ! R

76 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Local fields of positive characteristic

Fp - finite field

Fp[X ] ! Z

Fp(X ) ! Q

Fp((X−1)) ! R

77 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Local fields of positive characteristic

Fp - finite field

Fp[X ] ! Z

Fp(X ) ! Q

Fp((X−1)) ! R

78 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Euclidean buildings

G has a BN pair

Corresponding to which there is a Euclidean building

A Euclidean building is polyhedral complex

With a family of subcomplexes called apartments

There is a nice (CAT(0)) metric on the building

And G acts by isometries

79 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Euclidean buildings

G has a BN pair

Corresponding to which there is a Euclidean building

A Euclidean building is polyhedral complex

With a family of subcomplexes called apartments

There is a nice (CAT(0)) metric on the building

And G acts by isometries

80 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Euclidean buildings

G has a BN pair

Corresponding to which there is a Euclidean building

A Euclidean building is polyhedral complex

With a family of subcomplexes called apartments

There is a nice (CAT(0)) metric on the building

And G acts by isometries

81 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Euclidean buildings

G has a BN pair

Corresponding to which there is a Euclidean building

A Euclidean building is polyhedral complex

With a family of subcomplexes called apartments

There is a nice (CAT(0)) metric on the building

And G acts by isometries

82 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Euclidean buildings

G has a BN pair

Corresponding to which there is a Euclidean building

A Euclidean building is polyhedral complex

With a family of subcomplexes called apartments

There is a nice (CAT(0)) metric on the building

And G acts by isometries

83 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Euclidean buildings

G has a BN pair

Corresponding to which there is a Euclidean building

A Euclidean building is polyhedral complex

With a family of subcomplexes called apartments

There is a nice (CAT(0)) metric on the building

And G acts by isometries

84 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Borel-Harish-Chandra, Behr-Harder

G (Fp[X ]) is a lattice in G (Fp((X−1)))

Lubotzky

G (rank 1) has non-uniform and uniform, arithmetic and non-arithmeticlattices.

85 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Borel-Harish-Chandra, Behr-Harder

G (Fp[X ]) is a lattice in G (Fp((X−1)))

Lubotzky

G (rank 1) has non-uniform and uniform, arithmetic and non-arithmeticlattices.

86 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Logarithm laws for trees

T - a regular tree, then Aut(T ) is a locally compact group

Hersonsky and Paulin obtained logarithm laws for T/Γ

Where Γ is a geometrically finite lattice in Aut(T )

By Serre + Raghunathan + Lubotzky

This includes all algebraic examples

Namely lattices in rank 1 algebraic groups

87 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Logarithm laws for trees

T - a regular tree, then Aut(T ) is a locally compact group

Hersonsky and Paulin obtained logarithm laws for T/Γ

Where Γ is a geometrically finite lattice in Aut(T )

By Serre + Raghunathan + Lubotzky

This includes all algebraic examples

Namely lattices in rank 1 algebraic groups

88 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Logarithm laws for trees

T - a regular tree, then Aut(T ) is a locally compact group

Hersonsky and Paulin obtained logarithm laws for T/Γ

Where Γ is a geometrically finite lattice in Aut(T )

By Serre + Raghunathan + Lubotzky

This includes all algebraic examples

Namely lattices in rank 1 algebraic groups

89 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Logarithm laws for trees

T - a regular tree, then Aut(T ) is a locally compact group

Hersonsky and Paulin obtained logarithm laws for T/Γ

Where Γ is a geometrically finite lattice in Aut(T )

By Serre + Raghunathan + Lubotzky

This includes all algebraic examples

Namely lattices in rank 1 algebraic groups

90 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Logarithm laws for trees

T - a regular tree, then Aut(T ) is a locally compact group

Hersonsky and Paulin obtained logarithm laws for T/Γ

Where Γ is a geometrically finite lattice in Aut(T )

By Serre + Raghunathan + Lubotzky

This includes all algebraic examples

Namely lattices in rank 1 algebraic groups

91 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Logarithm laws for trees

T - a regular tree, then Aut(T ) is a locally compact group

Hersonsky and Paulin obtained logarithm laws for T/Γ

Where Γ is a geometrically finite lattice in Aut(T )

By Serre + Raghunathan + Lubotzky

This includes all algebraic examples

Namely lattices in rank 1 algebraic groups

92 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Logarithm laws for trees

T - a regular tree, then Aut(T ) is a locally compact group

Hersonsky and Paulin obtained logarithm laws for T/Γ

Where Γ is a geometrically finite lattice in Aut(T )

By Serre + Raghunathan + Lubotzky

This includes all algebraic examples

Namely lattices in rank 1 algebraic groups

93 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Trees continued

They also obtained generalizations of Khintchine’s theorem

In positive characteristic

Their method is very geometric

And reminiscent of Sullivan

94 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Trees continued

They also obtained generalizations of Khintchine’s theorem

In positive characteristic

Their method is very geometric

And reminiscent of Sullivan

95 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Trees continued

They also obtained generalizations of Khintchine’s theorem

In positive characteristic

Their method is very geometric

And reminiscent of Sullivan

96 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Trees continued

They also obtained generalizations of Khintchine’s theorem

In positive characteristic

Their method is very geometric

And reminiscent of Sullivan

97 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Let G be a connected, semisimple linear algebraic group defined andsplit over Fp

Let Γ be an S arithmetic lattice in GS

By a result of Margulis + Venkataramana

This includes any irreducible lattice in higher rank

98 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Let G be a connected, semisimple linear algebraic group defined andsplit over Fp

Let Γ be an S arithmetic lattice in GS

By a result of Margulis + Venkataramana

This includes any irreducible lattice in higher rank

99 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Let G be a connected, semisimple linear algebraic group defined andsplit over Fp

Let Γ be an S arithmetic lattice in GS

By a result of Margulis + Venkataramana

This includes any irreducible lattice in higher rank

100 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Let G be a connected, semisimple linear algebraic group defined andsplit over Fp

Let Γ be an S arithmetic lattice in GS

By a result of Margulis + Venkataramana

This includes any irreducible lattice in higher rank

101 / 127

Trees and Buildings

And their quotients

We prove analogues of the results of Kleinbock-Margulis

Namely logarithm laws for arithmetic quotients of

Bruhat-Tits buildings of semisimple groups

And several results in Diophantine Approximation

102 / 127

Trees and Buildings

And their quotients

We prove analogues of the results of Kleinbock-Margulis

Namely logarithm laws for arithmetic quotients of

Bruhat-Tits buildings of semisimple groups

And several results in Diophantine Approximation

103 / 127

Trees and Buildings

And their quotients

We prove analogues of the results of Kleinbock-Margulis

Namely logarithm laws for arithmetic quotients of

Bruhat-Tits buildings of semisimple groups

And several results in Diophantine Approximation

104 / 127

Trees and Buildings

And their quotients

We prove analogues of the results of Kleinbock-Margulis

Namely logarithm laws for arithmetic quotients of

Bruhat-Tits buildings of semisimple groups

And several results in Diophantine Approximation

105 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Main Result

Let B be a family of measurable subsets and F = {fn} denote asequence of µ-preserving transformations of G/Γ

B is Borel-Cantelli for F if for every sequence {An : n ∈ N} of setsfrom B

µ({x ∈ G/Γ | fn(x) ∈ An for infinitely many n ∈ N})

=

0 if

∑∞n=1 µ(An) <∞

1 if∑∞

n=1 µ(An) =∞

106 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Main Result

Let B be a family of measurable subsets and F = {fn} denote asequence of µ-preserving transformations of G/Γ

B is Borel-Cantelli for F if for every sequence {An : n ∈ N} of setsfrom B

µ({x ∈ G/Γ | fn(x) ∈ An for infinitely many n ∈ N})

=

0 if

∑∞n=1 µ(An) <∞

1 if∑∞

n=1 µ(An) =∞

107 / 127

Trees and Buildings

∆ a function on G/Γ define the tail distribution function

Φ∆(n) := µ({x ∈ G/Γ | ∆(x) ≥ sn})

Call ∆ “distance-like” if

Φ∆(n) � s−κn ∀ n ∈ Z

108 / 127

Trees and Buildings

∆ a function on G/Γ define the tail distribution function

Φ∆(n) := µ({x ∈ G/Γ | ∆(x) ≥ sn})

Call ∆ “distance-like” if

Φ∆(n) � s−κn ∀ n ∈ Z

109 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Let F = {fn | n ∈ N} be a sequence of elements of G satisfying

supm∈N

∞∑n=1

‖fnf −1m ‖−β <∞ ∀ β > 0,

and let ∆ be a “distance-like” function on G/Γ. Then

B(∆) := {{x ∈ G/Γ | ∆(x) ≥ sn} | n ∈ Z}

is Borel-Cantelli for F

110 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Let F = {fn | n ∈ N} be a sequence of elements of G satisfying

supm∈N

∞∑n=1

‖fnf −1m ‖−β <∞ ∀ β > 0,

and let ∆ be a “distance-like” function on G/Γ. Then

B(∆) := {{x ∈ G/Γ | ∆(x) ≥ sn} | n ∈ Z}

is Borel-Cantelli for F

111 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Let F = {fn | n ∈ N} be a sequence of elements of G satisfying

supm∈N

∞∑n=1

‖fnf −1m ‖−β <∞ ∀ β > 0,

and let ∆ be a “distance-like” function on G/Γ. Then

B(∆) := {{x ∈ G/Γ | ∆(x) ≥ sn} | n ∈ Z}

is Borel-Cantelli for F

112 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Ergodic ideas

We establish effective decay of matrix coefficients for semisimplegroups in positive characteristic

Well known to experts but unavailable in the literature

Main idea is to establish strong spectral gap for the regularrepresentation of G on G/Γ

For simple groups this is known due to work of Bekka and Lubotzky

They also show that there are tree lattices without spectral gap

113 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Ergodic ideas

We establish effective decay of matrix coefficients for semisimplegroups in positive characteristic

Well known to experts but unavailable in the literature

Main idea is to establish strong spectral gap for the regularrepresentation of G on G/Γ

For simple groups this is known due to work of Bekka and Lubotzky

They also show that there are tree lattices without spectral gap

114 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Ergodic ideas

We establish effective decay of matrix coefficients for semisimplegroups in positive characteristic

Well known to experts but unavailable in the literature

Main idea is to establish strong spectral gap for the regularrepresentation of G on G/Γ

For simple groups this is known due to work of Bekka and Lubotzky

They also show that there are tree lattices without spectral gap

115 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Ergodic ideas

We establish effective decay of matrix coefficients for semisimplegroups in positive characteristic

Well known to experts but unavailable in the literature

Main idea is to establish strong spectral gap for the regularrepresentation of G on G/Γ

For simple groups this is known due to work of Bekka and Lubotzky

They also show that there are tree lattices without spectral gap

116 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Ergodic ideas

We establish effective decay of matrix coefficients for semisimplegroups in positive characteristic

Well known to experts but unavailable in the literature

Main idea is to establish strong spectral gap for the regularrepresentation of G on G/Γ

For simple groups this is known due to work of Bekka and Lubotzky

They also show that there are tree lattices without spectral gap

117 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Effective mixing

Let G be a connected, semisimple, linear algebraic group, defined andquasi-split over k and Γ be an non-uniform irreducible lattice in G . Forany g ∈ G and any smooth functions φ, ψ ∈ L2

0(G/Γ),

|〈ρ0(g)φ, ψ〉| � ‖φ‖2‖ψ‖2H(g)−1/b.

We use the Burger-Sarnak method as extended to p-adic and positivecharacteristic fields by

Clozel and Ullmo

Along with the solution of the Ramanujan conjecture for GL2 due toDrinfield

118 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Effective mixing

Let G be a connected, semisimple, linear algebraic group, defined andquasi-split over k and Γ be an non-uniform irreducible lattice in G . Forany g ∈ G and any smooth functions φ, ψ ∈ L2

0(G/Γ),

|〈ρ0(g)φ, ψ〉| � ‖φ‖2‖ψ‖2H(g)−1/b.

We use the Burger-Sarnak method as extended to p-adic and positivecharacteristic fields by

Clozel and Ullmo

Along with the solution of the Ramanujan conjecture for GL2 due toDrinfield

119 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Effective mixing

Let G be a connected, semisimple, linear algebraic group, defined andquasi-split over k and Γ be an non-uniform irreducible lattice in G . Forany g ∈ G and any smooth functions φ, ψ ∈ L2

0(G/Γ),

|〈ρ0(g)φ, ψ〉| � ‖φ‖2‖ψ‖2H(g)−1/b.

We use the Burger-Sarnak method as extended to p-adic and positivecharacteristic fields by

Clozel and Ullmo

Along with the solution of the Ramanujan conjecture for GL2 due toDrinfield

120 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Effective mixing

Let G be a connected, semisimple, linear algebraic group, defined andquasi-split over k and Γ be an non-uniform irreducible lattice in G . Forany g ∈ G and any smooth functions φ, ψ ∈ L2

0(G/Γ),

|〈ρ0(g)φ, ψ〉| � ‖φ‖2‖ψ‖2H(g)−1/b.

We use the Burger-Sarnak method as extended to p-adic and positivecharacteristic fields by

Clozel and Ullmo

Along with the solution of the Ramanujan conjecture for GL2 due toDrinfield

121 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Volumes

Complements of compacta

µ({x ∈ G/Γ : d(x0, x) ≥ sn}) � s−κn

We compute volumes of cusps directly

Using an explicit description in terms of algebraic data attached to G

Building on work of Harder, Soule and others

122 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Volumes

Complements of compacta

µ({x ∈ G/Γ : d(x0, x) ≥ sn}) � s−κn

We compute volumes of cusps directly

Using an explicit description in terms of algebraic data attached to G

Building on work of Harder, Soule and others

123 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Volumes

Complements of compacta

µ({x ∈ G/Γ : d(x0, x) ≥ sn}) � s−κn

We compute volumes of cusps directly

Using an explicit description in terms of algebraic data attached to G

Building on work of Harder, Soule and others

124 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Volumes

Complements of compacta

µ({x ∈ G/Γ : d(x0, x) ≥ sn}) � s−κn

We compute volumes of cusps directly

Using an explicit description in terms of algebraic data attached to G

Building on work of Harder, Soule and others

125 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Picture credits

D. Sullivan, Acta Math 1982

Ulrich Gortz, Modular forms and special cycles on Shimura curves, S.Kudla, M. Rapoport and T. Yang

126 / 127

Trees and Buildings

Picture credits

D. Sullivan, Acta Math 1982

Ulrich Gortz, Modular forms and special cycles on Shimura curves, S.Kudla, M. Rapoport and T. Yang

127 / 127

Recommended