Fusion Cross Section of 38S+208Pb

Preview:

Citation preview

Fusion Cross Section of 38S+208Pb

1 2 3

BACKGROUND

Atoms, Nuclei, Protons & Neutrons

The strong nuclear force is pronounced between nucleons found within any nuclei.

Nucleons:

• Protons

• Neutrons

http://content-calpoly-edu.s3.amazonaws.com/physics/1/images/other_pics/NuclearParticleBanner.png

Addition of Nucleons

Neutron Proton2

216

38 – SSulfur

UNSTABL

E

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f0/Nucleus_drawing.svg/1024px-Nucleus_drawing.svg.png

Field of Research

Strong Nuclear Force

Nuclear fusion occurs when nuclei come in close proximity(femto-meter range)and form a bigger nucleus.

CALIFORNIUM246

Nuclear Fusion

Take for an example38S+208Pb which form…

Implications for Society andthe Physics Community

https://newscenter.lbl.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2010/10/Heidelberg-patient.jpg

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/10/16/1413458769593_wps_28_Fusion_Reactor_Image_by_M.jpg

http://www.peency.com/images/2014/10/18/21805-sn-1987a-supernova-2880x1800-space-wallpaper.jpg

Research Question

Research Question

How do Time Dependent Hartree- Fock (TDHF) calculations compare with experimental results by Loveland et al. on the fusion cross section of 38S+208Pb ?

36S+208Pb 34S+208

Pb 32S+208Pb

38S+208Pb

STABLE

UNSTABLE

Loveland’s Experimental Data

Loveland et al. Phy. Rev. C 74, 044607 (2006)

Bryant, Avila

Tools and Methods.

KEEP CALMANDUSE

TIME DEPENDENTHARTREE – FOCK

THEORYCODE

Computer Simulations.

HPCC Supercomputer.

TDHF code.

C. Simenel, Eur. Phys. J A 48, 152 (2012)

How TDHF code works

Ψ

Ψ

Ψ

Ψ

Code developed by Paul Bonche in the 70’s.Currently maintained by Simenel Cedric.

C. Simenel, Eur. Phys. J A 48, 152 (2012)

Simulation Visualization

1∗10− 21𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑠

Methods

Diagram flow of procedure.

Results.TDHF simulations and experimental data are similar.

Up to around 50% above the fusion barrier.

Fusion Barrier

50% above

TDHF not accurate at high energies.

Loveland et al. Phy. Rev. C 74, 044607 (2006)

Results.TDHF simulations and experimental data are similar.

Up to around 50% above the fusion barrier.

TDHF not accurate at high energies.

Loveland et al. Phy. Rev. C 74, 044607 (2006)

Hagino et al., Comput. Phys. Commm 123, 143 (1999)

More Results and Conclusions.TDHF is the BEST to simulate the fusion barrier.

More Results and Conclusions.

TDHF does the BEST at determining the interactive radius.

Interaction Radius

Conclusions

Conclusions

Loveland et al. Phy. Rev. C 74, 044607 (2006)

How do Time Dependent Hartree- Fock calculations compare with experimental results by Loveland et al. on the fusion cross section of 38S+208Pb ?

• Experimental data and TDHF Calculations agree.

• TDHF is able to simulate heavy nuclei reactions.

• TDHF accurately simulates reactions with unstable nuclei.

Acknowledgements

Mr. Steven Thomas

Dr. Zach Kohley and group

Dr. Aditya Wakhle

SROP personnel & students

NIH grant 5T34GM007639-34

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Any Questions?

Recommended