From Read India I to Read India III

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

From Read India I to Read India III. Evolution and Next Strategy. Programs and delivery. Pratham evolution. Read India. Learning to read. Tool is simple. Volunteers can assess. Parents understand. Testing Tool . Simple inexpensive materials. Letters, numbers, and barakhadi chart: . - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

From Read India I to Read India III

Evolution and Next Strategy

JRM 2012 2

Programs and delivery

Pre-school

Bridge class, remedial classes

L2R campaign

ASER

READ INDIAVolunteer classesLearning campsScience, EnglishOpen school Learning CentersVocational

JRM 2012 3

Pratham evolution

Service provisionUrban

InnovationService provisionUrbanRuralNational

PolicyInnovationService provisionUrbanRuralNational International

Research ??TrainingContent PolicyInnovationUrban RuralNationalInternational

JRM 2012 4

Read India

Learning to Read•2002-04

ASER •2005-

Read India I•2007-09•L2R •Campaigns

with states

Read India II•2010-13•L2R+ R2L•CAMAL•Learning

camps

Read India III•2013-16

JRM 2012 5

LEARNING TO READ

JRM 2012 6

JRM 2012 7

Tool is simple. Volunteers can assess. Parents understand.

Testing Tool

JRM 2012 8

Simple inexpensive materials• Letters, numbers, and barakhadi

chart: • Simple paragraphs: set of 50 costs

10 cents.

JRM 2012 9

Basis of Read India- MP 2005-06Change in the percentage of readers in MP betwen Jun05 and Jan 06 compared to readers in Uttaranchal and Kerala (Readers = sum

of para level I and sotry level II readers)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th

MP June

MP-ASER

MP- Jan

Uttaranchal-ASER

Kerala ASER

JRM 2012 10

READ INDIA I

JRM 2012 11

300-370 districts

Government Collaboration• Madhya Pradesh 2007-08• Chhattisgarh 2008-09• Punjab 2008-11

• Himachal Pradesh• Uttarakhand

• UP 2007-09• Bihar (Sankalp) 2007-10• Nagaland

No collaboration• Andhra Pradesh• Maharashtra• Gujarat• Odisha • Jharkhand• Assam • W Bengal

JRM 2012 12

Read India I and after

Punjab

Chhattisgarh

JRM 2012 13

Lessons learned

Government Partnership• When governments

participate with energy and focus in combination with voluntary efforts, effectiveness is high

• Partnerships are inconsistent – Government indecision and delays…

• “Holistic” , “child-centric” ideals worked against “learning outcome” focus.

Volunteers and community• Children who attend

volunteer classes learn but reach is a problem

• Targeting specific children may be needed.

• Teaching children in ability-wise groups is effective

• Training time is limited• Community is not always

aware of efforts.

JRM 2012 14

READ INDIA II 2010-11

JRM 2012 15

Block Excellence Program

• Units of 100 villages • 5 clusters of 20 villages

each in Block

• Changed model of volunteer training

• Education for Education added

• CAMaL approach developed

• Learning to Read in backward states and Reading to Learn in advanced states

• Reading to Learn evolving- including assessment methodology

JRM 2012 16

3 years of Read India II

2010-11 Reduced scale – changed training modelEducation for Education

2011-12 Education of Education all statesExperimenting with learning camps- summer camp

2012-13Learning camps all states- main model EFE changingLess volunteer time neededExperimenting for high impact and depth

JRM 2012 17

Government Partnerships

State level• Punjab continued but

uncertain• Himachal for upper primary

math and English content and training

• Gujarat assistance with Pragya

Region or districts• Uttarakhand remedial

learning in BEP• Non-financial in Odisha and

Rajasthan BEP- • Bihar – district level

evolving• Maharashtra on and off• Chhattisgarh 3 blocks

JRM 2012 18

LEARNING CAMP AND CAMAL APPROACH

JRM 2012 19

• MAH, MP, CHHGRH, ODI, AP, GUJ tried learning camps from Sep 2011.

• Other states started in summer 2012

• Volunteer classes continuing in many states but learning camp is the main method of delivery now.

• Summer camps (Apr-May-Jun, Jul 2012): 7005 villages. 200,000 children. Duration varied from 5 days to 30 days.

• Learning camps Aug-Nov: 8333 villages, 300,000 children Std 3-5

• Duration about 7-10 days per camp with ave 2 volunteers

JRM 2012 20

SMS MONITORING

• http://pratham.tlitech.net/

JRM 2012 21

Harshad’s learning camp

JRM 2012 22

JRM 2012 23

CAMaL Approach- Numbers

JRM 2012 24

Questions

Std 3-5 • How many camps are needed

to achieve math, reading, writing goals?

• How can a learning camp delivery strategy be optimized for impact, time, cost?

• Should Pratham modify its delivery strategy to focus on a whole district to achieve best delivery and advocacy impact?

Std 1-2 • Can learning camps be

useful for Std 1-2? • What strategy can be used

for emergent and early reading- numeracy?

JRM 2012 25

WHAT CAN BE ACHIEVED IN 3 LEARNING CAMPS? HOW CAN WE TRANSFER KNOW-HOW TO GOVERNMENT SCHOOL SYSTEMS?

JRM 2012 26

READ INDIA III

Government seems to be moving towards learning outcomes with goal setting. Need to keep pushing

JRM 2012 27

New Context

JRM 2012 28

JRM 2012 29

Broad Academic Plan

Emergent and early literacy- math• Age Groups:

– age 3-5 +6-7 – Age 8-10 /12

• Stage-wise goals in Reading, Writing, and Math

• Listening -Speaking – expression

• Reading fluency and comprehension

• Writing skills – engaging with texts and self expression

Building on basics • Age groups:

– 11-14 – 14-18 – 18+

• Foundation Course in basic reading, writing, math for all age groups

• Math, English, Science for all age groups

• Foundation and Secondary Certification

JRM 2012 30

Organization Read India Leadership

Research

With ASER

Training and Content Group

Training Blocks

On ground leadership

1. Pre-school + Std 1 and 22. Std 3-5

Advocacy

Communication Documentation

JRM 2012 31

CHOICES AND OPTIONS

JRM 2012 32

Width vs depth?

What scale is sustainable• Should we work in 19

states? • If we do cut down.. On what

basis? • Should we scale down

further? • Without scale no ability to

work with governments on large scale.

What depth is sustainable• Should we go on increasing

depth of intervention? • Depth require more time

and money. But, it is also important to offer solutions for broader education agenda

JRM 2012 33

Std 3-5

Learning camp as demo-advocacy

• Demo district? Or, demo blocks?

• 10,000 schools per year for 3-5 years OR 30,000 schools over three years

Impacting governments• Abandon demo work when

working with government? Or, train additional people to work with government?

• Human resource issue

JRM 2012 34

Pre-school and Std 1-2

Demo villages? • Set up balwadis in cluster

centers • Parents’ self help groups?

• Library for children with take-home worksheets etc?

Working with government• Volunteers to work in

schools or ICDS for 1 hr every day

• Does mere training of teachers work? MP government talks.

JRM 2012

Financial sustainability

Private and Corporate funds• More fundraising efforts in

India. • Will corporate funds lead to

diffusion of geographic focused demonstration?

• Long term foundation funding: how long will it last?

Entrepreneurial? • Volunteers and education

entrepreneurs and tutors? Is this desirable

• Pratham Supported Schools- should we support private schools for a revenue?

Should Pratham start or take over or adopt schools?

JRM 2012 36

MORE ON THE 15TH

Recommended