Frequency Scaling and Topology Comparison of Millimeter-wave VCOs

University of Toronto 2006 1

Frequency Scaling and Topology Comparison of Millimeter-wave VCOs

Keith TangSteven Leung

Nelson TieuPeter Schvan*

Sorin Voinigescu

University of Toronto, *NORTEL

University of Toronto 2006 2

Outline

Motivation

VCO Design Methodology

Frequency Scaling

Measurement

Summary

University of Toronto 2006 3

Motivation

MOSFET DC, HF and noise characteristics are scalable across technology nodesVCO topologies are very simple with one or two transistor half-circuits

Algorithmic design and frequency scaling methodologies can be developed even at 77GHz

→ Design productivity increases!

University of Toronto 2006 4

Colpitts VCO – Design1. Choose LTANK (smallest for

low phase noise)

2. Calculate Ceq from operating frequency

3. Bias transistors at optimum noise current density (0.15

mA/m)

4. Size transistors to provide enough negative resistance

5. Choose LS large (AC open)

6. Add RSS, CSS and LSS for bias and noise de-coupling

University of Toronto 2006 5

Cross-coupled VCO – Design

1. Choose LTANK

2. Bias transistors at optimum noise current density (0.15 mA/m)

3. Size transistors to provide enough negative resistance

4. Calculate CVAR from operating frequency

University of Toronto 2006 6

LTANK

C1

CVAR

Frequency Scaling

LTANK/k

C1/k

CVAR/k

LCfOSC

1

fOSCk

Same applies to cross-coupled VCO

University of Toronto 2006 7

8 2 1.6

Nf does not scale with L and C at very high frequency because of parasitic gate and source resistances

fOSC drops by 20% in 180-nm VCO due to lack of parasitic extraction tools

VCO Test Structures

Colpitts VCO

90-nm

10 GHz

90-nm

77 GHz

180-nm

20 GHz

180-nm

40 GHz

90-nm

50 GHz

90-nm

80 GHz

LTANK [pH] 435 50 200 100 100 60

C1 [fF] 800 100 100 50 50 35

CVAR [fF] 800 100 100 50 50 35

Wf [um] 1 1 2 2 2 2

Nf 100 60 40 20 20 16

University of Toronto 2006 8

VCO Test Structures (2)

Cross-coupled VCO

90-nm

10 GHz

90-nm

12 GHz

180-nm

17 GHz

LTANK [pH] 435 273 70

CVAR [fF] 260 260 70

Wf [um] 1 1 2

Nf 24 24 40

University of Toronto 2006 9

Tuning range:

9.2 – 10.4 GHz (11.8%)

10-GHz Colpitts VCO

Record phase noise:

-117.5 dBc/Hz @ 1 MHz (100 avg.)

University of Toronto 2006 10

Record tuning range:

73.8 – 80.0 GHz (8.3%)

77-GHz Colpitts VCO

Record phase noise:

-100.3 dBc/Hz @ 1 MHz (100 avg.)20log(8) ≈ 17dB higher than

10-GHz VCO’s phase noise!

University of Toronto 2006 11

10-GHz Cross-coupled VCO

Phase noise:

-109.2 dBc/Hz @ 1 MHz (100 avg.)

Tuning range:

9.3 – 10.9 GHz (15.8%)

University of Toronto 2006 12

77-GHz CMOSCross-coupled VCOs

First VCO with p-MOSFET at 77 GHz

University of Toronto 2006 13

Die Photos77 GHz Colpitts VCO:

0.42mm

0.40mm0.16mm

0.22mm

77 GHz Cross-coupledVCO:

0.37mm

0.27mm0.08mm

0.22mm

University of Toronto 2006 14

√ ․√ X

At very high frequency…

Topology Comparison

Topology Colpitts Cross-coupled

Power consumption

Tuning range

Output power

Phase noise

At low frequency:

√ √

√ ․

․ √

√ X

√ X

․ √

University of Toronto 2006 15

Figure of Merit for VCO defined in ITRS 2003:

But, output power is important for mixer, PA…

VCO Figure of Merit

DISS

OSC

PfLf

fFoM

][

12

1

DISS

OUTOSC

PfL

P

f

fFoM

][

2

2

University of Toronto 2006 16

FoMs Comparison

With FoM2, SiGe HBT VCOs show better performance than CMOS VCOs at mm-wave frequencies

University of Toronto 2006 17

Summary

VCOs with record-breaking performances achieved by algorithmic design at 10 and 77 GHz

Frequency scaling of Colpitts VCOs from 10 to 77

GHz in 90-nm CMOS, 20 to 40 GHz in 180-nm CMOS demonstrated

First cross-coupled VCO with p-MOSFET at77 GHzColpitts topology exhibits better performances

than cross-coupled topology at mm-wave frequencies

University of Toronto 2006 18

Acknowledgement

NORTEL and CMC for fabricationCMC for CAD toolsCFI and OIT for test equipmentDr. M. T. Yang for support

University of Toronto 2006 19

Loss at Very High FrequencyConsidering the transistor’s resistance:

RG, RS increase with frequency and both lumped to RTANK

- Larger transistor size required at very high frequencies

It is critical to keep the VCO layout identical:- Transistor layout- Component orientation- Interconnect routing

such that layout parasitics also scale

fRRN

RR

fNC

SGf

SG

f

,1

,

1,1

University of Toronto 2006 20

Ref Process fosc

[GHz]

Tuning[%]

Phase Noise[dBc/Hz]

Pout

[dBm]

Pdiss

[mW]

FoM1

[dB]FoM2

[dB]

* 90-nm CMOS:Colpitts

10 12.2 -117.5@1MHz 4.0 36 181.9 185.9

77 8.1 -100.3@1MHz -13.8 37.5 182.3 168.5

* NMOS cross-coupled 10 15.8 -109.2@1MHz -2.2 7.5 180.4 178.2

* CMOS cross-coupled 77 2.6 -84.3@10MHz -13.2 13.5 150.7 137.5

[1] 90-nm CMOS 60 0.17 -100@1MHz -23.2 1.9 192.8 169.6

*[6] SiGe HBT, fT = 170GHz 96 4.6 -101.6@1MHz 0.7 133 180.0 180.7

SiGe HBT, fT = 230GHz 105 4.4 -101.3@1MHz 2.7 133 180.3 183.0

[7] SiGe HBT, fT = 175GHz 77 8.7 -97@1MHz 18.5 1200 163.9 183.0

100 6.2 -90@1MHz 14.3 1200 159.2 173.5

[8] SiGe HBT, fT = 200GHz 75 6.1 -105@1MHz 3.5 72 183.9 187.4

[9] SiGe HBT, fT = 200GHz 98 3.3 -85@1MHz -6 60 167.0 161.0

[10] SiGe HBT, fT = 200GHz 85 2.7 -94@1MHz -8 25 178.6 170.6

[11] InP HBT, fT = 75GHz 108 2.6 -88@1MHz 0.92 204 165.6 166.5

[12] 130nm CMOS 90 2.4 -105@10MHz -16 15.5 172.2 156.2

[13] 130nm CMOS 114 2.1 -107.6@10MHz -22.5 8.4 179.5 157.0

* our work