View
220
Download
2
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Financing The World’s Toughest Financing The World’s Toughest Energy ChallengesEnergy Challenges
Presentation forPresentation forRoss School of Business Corporate Finance ForumRoss School of Business Corporate Finance Forum
September 21, 2007
Page 2
Every 24 Hours . . .
Page 3
Size Matters
2006 Net Income $39.5 B– ROCE 32%– Assets $219 B– Shareholder’s Equity $114 B– Cash $33 B– Net Debt/Capital (20%)
Long-standing AAA rated company
Page 4
Source: Fortune, as of 3/23/07
Profit Ranking
1. Exxon Mobil ($39.5 B)
2. UAL ($22.8 B)
3. Citigroup ($21.5 B)
4. Bank of America ($21.1 B)
5. General Electric ($20.8 B)
Market Capitalization
1. Exxon Mobil ($426 B)
2. General Electric ($368 B)
3. Microsoft ($274 B)
4. Citigroup ($256 B)
5. AT&T ($243 B)
Source: Fortune, 2006
Proven Performance and Unmatched Scale
Page 5
Project Finance Overview: ConsiderationsProject Finance Overview: ConsiderationsWhat is project finance? Project financing is debt financing secured with future project cash flows plus, in many cases,
project assets or JV interests– Lender recourse directly to the project owners is generally limited to the pre-completion period
Project financing can provide substantial benefits: Enables cash-constrained partners to fund their share of expenditures
– Resolve budget constraints– Conserve available equity for funding of other / additional projects– Avoid project delays / interruptions and carries / guarantees that adversely impact project
economics Imposes discipline on host country governments in high risk locations
– Constrains governments from viewing contracts as “living” documents– Payments assured through offshore accounts and cash waterfall structure
Political risk mitigation afforded by the presence of certain lenders – Actions against certain lenders impact government access to future funding
Can serve as a potential means to reduce stake in project / country exposure Raises the borrower’s profile with lenders through project finance marketing process Can develop the local financial sector through the participation of local lenders
However there are potential drawbacks: Historically expensive source of funding versus centralized corporate borrowing Time consuming placement process that may result in project delay Loan administration / compliance often burdensome
Page 6
USAMaritimes NE
Pipeline $1,010 M
CanadaHibernia$1,350 M
VenezuelaCerro Negro
$900 M
NigeriaOso
$590 M
NGL I$330 M
NGL II$1,275 M
Satellite OilField Project
$600 M
AzerbaijanACG Early
Oil$285 M
Chad/Cameroon$600 M
QatarQatargas D/S
$1,995 M
Qatargas U/S$570 M
RasGas $2,550 M
Qatargas II U/S
$6,500 M
RasGas refin.
$665 M
Ras Gas II/3$10,000 M program($4,600 M
raised)
SingaporeSingaporeAromatics Complex
$600 M
Saudi ArabiaYanpet
Chemical Plant$2,300 M
KemyaChemical Plant
$700 M
UKSouth Hook
LNG Terminal$1,100 M
KazakhstanTCO Expansion
$4,400 M
EM’s Project Financings have Spanned the Globe
Page 7
NGL II
RasGas
Ref
inan
cing
RasGas
II/3
Qatar
gas II
2004/2005 Project Financings: TCO
Expan
sion
• ExxonMobil also has significant experience working with Multilateral Agencies such as the IFC, EBRD, IBRD, and the World Bank
Niger
ia
Satel
lites
Overview of Recent Deals
Page 8
Rank Project CountryDebt
(US$M) Participants
1 Qatargas II Qatar 6,500 Qatar Petroleum, ExxonMobil
2 Ras Gas II/3 Qatar 4,600 Qatar Petroleum, ExxonMobil
3 Tengiz Chevroil (TCO) Kazakhstan 4,400 ChevronTexaco, ExxonMobil, KMG
4 Qatargas 3 Qatar 4,341 CONOCOPHILLIPS, Qatar Petroleum
5 Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) Pipeline
Azerbaijan 3,020 BP, SOCAR, TPAO, Statoil, Unocal, Itochu, Amerada Hess, Eni, TotalFinaElf, INPEX, ConocoPhillips
6 Mitsui O.S.K. Lines LNG Ships (Serve Ras Gas II/3)
Qatar 1,650 MITSUI & CO LIMITED, IINO KAIUN KAISHA LIMITED, NIPPON YUSEN KABUSHIKI KAISHA, KAWASAKI KISEN KAISHA LTD, MITSUI O.S.K LINES LIMITED
7 MPN Natural Gas Liquids Plant (NGL II)
Nigeria 1,275 ExxonMobil, NNPC
8 South Hook LNG Terminal UK 1,100 Qatar Petroleum, ExxonMobil
9 Gazprom Refinancing Russia 1,100 Gazpromneft
10 Dampier-to-Bunbury Natural Gas Pipeline
Australia 1,017 Alcoa World Alumina Australia, Alint, DUET
Total for ExxonMobil: 17,875
Overview of Recent Deals (cont.)
Top 10 Oil and Gas Financings 2004-2005
Source: Thomson Project Finance International- data includes project sponsor loans to the extent known and excludes bridge loans
Page 9
2004: #1 bank Citigroup $10.9 B as Lead Arranger / Manager compared to ExxonMobil $13.9 B
Unrivaled Scale
Source: HBS Project Finance Portal
2004 Amount 2004 Amount Rank Name Underwritten Rank Name Underwritten
1 Citigroup $6,414 1 Lehman Brothers $4,5482 BNP Paribas 4,272 2 Citigroup 4,5303 Credit Suisse First Boston 4,178 3 Goldman Sachs 3,4534 Royal Bank of Scotland 3,785 4 Societe Generale 2,0195 Societe Generale 3,529 5 HSBC 1,6676 Sumitomo Mitsui 3,475 6 Credit Suisse First Boston 1,4517 Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi 3,456 7 Calyon 1,4288 HSBC 3,391 8 Deutsche Bank 1,2039 Korea Development Bank 3,325 9 JP Morgan 1,128
10 ABN AMRO 3,155 10 Royal Bank of Canada 748Other 77,459 Other 6,472
Total Market $116,439 Total Market $28,647
Lead Arrangers - Bank Loans (US$ M) Lead Managers - Project Bonds (US$ M)
Page 10
Financing for 2 large (7.8 MTA each) LNG Trains and UK Receiving Terminal (EM 30%)
Raised $7.6 B in total (including UK South Hook Receiving Terminal)– $3.2 billion from commercial banks– $530 million in Shari’a-compliant Islamic financing – $800 million in ECA facilities (US Exim and Sace)– £420 million bank facility– $2.3 billion in ExxonMobil co-lending
Standard project financing with several step-out structural elements– Limited restrictions on project’s business
– Limited incremental loan compliance requirements
Largest ever energy project financing / 3rd largest project financing ever– First LNG project financed wellhead to terminal in an integrated financing – Largest long term Islamic project financing– Terminal financing is the longest pound sterling denominated bank energy transaction without
government or mono-line credit support
Qatargas IIQatargas II
Page 11
Financing for 5 LNG trains with a total capacity of 30 MTA (EM 30%)
$10 B rated debt facility put into place; $4.6 B raised to date from commercial banks, the international capital markets and ExxonMobil co-loans
– $2.25 billion from capital markets (15 and 22 year maturities)
– $970 million from commercial banks
– $1.38 billion in ExxonMobil co-lending
Excellent ratings achieved (A1/A+/A)
Hybrid structure resulted in extremely favorable loan terms:
– No guarantees, support commitments or completion guarantees required
– No restrictions or limits on project’s business or trade counterparties
– No incremental loan compliance requirements; no rating affirmation required
Bond portion was largest ever energy project financing in the capital markets
Attractive pricing
– Bonds priced below Qatar implied sovereign debt rates
– Lowest bank pricing for any long-term energy financing in recent years
Strong distribution across the US, Europe, the Middle East and Asia with significant number of new investors in Qatar
RasGas II/3 Financing
Page 12
Decrease in Qatar Debt Rate
Qatar borrowing rates fell as the RasGasII/3 financing was marketed
Page 13
Oil extraction and processing facilities expansion for TengizChevroil (EM 25%)
Raised $4.4 B in total– $1.1 B from capital markets (10 year maturity)– $2.2 B from Chevron co-loans– $1.1 B in ExxonMobil co-lending
Extremely favorable loan terms:– No completion guarantees, no recourse to partners, minimal compliance– No restrictions or limits related to permitted business or trade counterparties– TCO management of escrow accounts unless in default– No rating affirmation for new debt incurrence, distributions or expansions
Largest financing and lowest all-in cost of financing ever for Kazakhstan– Largest project financing bond offering in 2004
Co-lending resulted in all of the limited market capacity for TCO project financing being used by National Oil Company (KMG)
Successful financing provides Kazakhstan with enhanced market credibility and improves future financing prospects
– Road Show associated with project financing educated the lending community about Kazakhstan and its oil and gas projects resulting in an expanded pool of lenders
TCO ExpansionTCO Expansion
Page 14
Qatargas IIQatargas II 2004 Project Finance International EMEA Gas Deal of the Year2004 Project Finance EuroMoney
Global Deal of the Year
TCOTCO 2004 Project Finance EuroMoney Corporate Bond Finance of the Year
RasGas II/3RasGas II/3 2005 Project Finance EuroMoney EMEA Project Finance Deal of the YearGlobal Deal of the Year
NigeriaNigeria 2005 Trade Finance & 2005 Global TradeSatellitesSatellites Review
Deal of the Year Honors
Record of Success in our recent Project Financings
Page 15
Treasurer’s RoleTreasurer’s Role
Strategy– Work closely with the business to ensure that commercial agreements are ‘bankable’– Assess risks and develop finance plan to support EM’s business objectives at lowest cost
Financing Process– Represent EM on JV Finance Team and lead negotiation of all finance matters– Select and hire financial advisors, external counsel and all lender consultants / advisors– Develop financing term sheet and coordinate development of Information Memorandum, Offering
Circular, Rating Agency presentations, financial model and ESIA– Negotiate financing documentation and coordinate / manage lender due diligence and consultant
work– Participate in / coordinate bond road show, bank meetings, pricing and deal closing
Post Closing– Develop loan compliance processes / manual and define Treasurer’s, Business Line, Controller's,
Law and SHE roles– Coordinate / manage loan compliance effort and act as interface with lenders / third parties– Conduct lessons learned with advisors / counsel to capture best practices and enhance future
financings
Page 16
As a leader in Project Finance, a career with ExxonMobil Treasurer’s offers unparalleled experience and training in this field
Landscape constantly changing and innovation is always needed
The Finance Function can create an additional source of competitive advantage and bring value to the organization through excellence in Project Finance
SummarySummary
Recommended