Exploiting Constructive Interference for Scalable Flooding in Wireless Networks

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

Exploiting Constructive Interference for Scalable Flooding in Wireless Networks. InfoCom 2012 Yin Wang, Yuan He, Xufei Mao, Yunhao Liu, Zhiyu Huang, Xiangyang Li NSLab study group 2013/1/21 Presented by: Yu-Ting. Outline. Theoretical Analysis Scalability Problem Lower Bound of PRR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

1

Exploiting Constructive Interference for Scalable Flooding in Wireless Networks

InfoCom 2012Yin Wang, Yuan He, Xufei Mao, Yunhao Liu, Zhiyu Huang, Xiangyang Li

NSLab study group 2013/1/21Presented by: Yu-Ting

2

Outline

• Theoretical Analysis• Scalability Problem• Lower Bound of PRR• SCIF

Modulation & Demodulation• Symbol (4bits) period: 16us (4bit/250kbps)• Chip period Ts: 16(us/symbol) ÷ 32(chip/symbol) = 0.5us

bits(MSB)…0101…(LSB)

bit → symbol

symbol…5…

symbol→PN series

O-QPSK Mod.

PN series (LSB)…00110101001000101110110110011100…(MSB)

modulating wave

noise

O-QPSK Demod.

PN series→symbol(find the highest correlation)

PN series (with 1 bit error) (LSB)…10110101001000101110110110011100…(MSB)

symbol…5…

(correctly Demod.)

symbol → bit

bits(MSB)…0101…(LSB)

3

4

Modulation of QPSK & O-QPSK(from Wiki)

• QPSK

• O-QPSK

5

Threshold ofMaximum Temporal Displacement ∆

• Tc = 0.5us

6

Theoretical Analysis

Interference Gain Factor (IGF)

7

Simulation of Theoretical Analysis

• Amplitudes: [1 , 1 , 0.5 , 1.5 ]• Phase offsets: [0 , 0.25 , 0.5 , 0.75]

8

Outline

• Theoretical Analysis• Scalability Problem• Lower Bound of PRR• SCIF

9

Scalability Problem

• To be simple, there's time uncertainty τe during transmission in each hop

• For a path of h hops, the PMF of accumulated τe is:

• For m independent paths, each of which consists h hops originated at the sink node:∆ = max( τh

e) − min(τhe)

• ∆ increases as m & h increase• PRR decreases as ∆ increases

10

• m = 5

11

Outline

• Theoretical Analysis• Scalability Problem• Lower Bound of PRR• SCIF

12

Lower Bound of PRR

• Assume in grid networks• Γh

m(∆ ≤ t): CDF of ∆ of a common ancestor node propagates a packet

• CDF of ∆ ≤ 0.5µs between nodeN8 and N9:

N5 → {N8,N9}N2 → {N4,N5} → {N8,N9}N0 → {N1,N2} → {N4,N5} → {N8,N9}

• (Skip proof)For 32 bytes packet length,Γh

m(∆ ≤ 0.5) between parent and childs >= 95.4%

13

Outline

• Theoretical Analysis• Scalability Problem• Lower Bound of PRR• SCIF

14

SCIF

• Spine Constructive Interference based Flooding

• Key:– Decrease the # of m– Length of a grid cell=0.5

of communication range=> guarantee connection

15

Simulation Result

16

Comments

• Decent mathematical analysis• Good introduction to related work• No implementation• With capture effect (strong capture), Glossy is

actually not so vulnerable• With noise, SCIF is probably not so good

17

Q&A

18

BACKUP SLIDES

19

Scalability Problem

• Time uncertainty τe during transmission in each hop

• In Glossy: τe = τsw + τd + τtx + τp

τsw: software delayτd: radio processingτtx: clock uncertainty due to clock frequency driftsτp: propagation delay

Recommended