Exercise Device

Preview:

DESCRIPTION

This is my team\'s final presentation to our Introduction of Mechanical Engineering Design, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship course at Purdue University. The task was to develop a unique workout device.

Citation preview

Peak Performance Engineering

Problem Statement

Create Compact Total Body Workout Equipment That Provides Both:

• Cardiovascular Workout» Weight Loss / Fat Burning

• Strength Training» Muscle Toning / Muscle Building

Peak Performance Engineering

Problem Statement (Redefined)

Create Compact Total Body Workout Equipment That Provides Both:

• Upper Body Strength Training Capabilities» Muscle Toning / Muscle Building

• Lower Body Strength Training Capabilities» Muscle Toning / Muscle Building

Peak Performance Engineering

Market ResearchProduct Type Retail Sales Percentage of Sales

Aerobic Riders $25,000,000 0.66%

Aerobic Steps $5,000,000 0.13%

Cross-Country Ski Machines $50,000,000 1.34%

Elliptical Trainers $600,000,000 16.04%

Free Weights $130,000,000 3.48%

Home Gyms $540,000,000 14.44%

Rowing Machines $5,000,000 0.13%

Stair-Climbing Machines $180,000,000 4.81%

Stationary Exercise Bicycles $360,000,000 9.63%

Treadmills $1,650,000,000 44.12%

Weight Benches $195,000,000 5.21%

Total $3,740,000,000 100%

Peak Performance Engineering

Market Research

Peak Performance Engineering

Sales Quantity of Home Gyms

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Year

Qu

an

ity (

in t

ho

usan

ds)

Market Research

Peak Performance Engineering

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

Av

era

ge

A

rea

(s

qu

are

fe

et)

Aerobic riders

Cross-country ski machines

Elliptical cross-tra

iners

Free weights

Home gyms

Rowing machines

Single-station gym

Stair-clim

bing machine

Stationary cycles

Treadmills

Type of Equipmnt

Average Area Required for Fitness Equipment

Customer Requirements

Peak Performance Engineering

HOQ

Engineering Requirements

Peak Performance Engineering

HOQ

Operational Description

Peak Performance Engineering

Operational Description

Peak Performance Engineering

Operational Description

Peak Performance Engineering

Operational Description

Peak Performance Engineering

Operational Description

Peak Performance Engineering

Operational Description

Peak Performance Engineering

Operational Description

Peak Performance Engineering

Individual Parts

• ½” plywood cut to size• Padding & cover• Polypropylene straps

• Aluminum sheet metal bent to desired shape• Locating guides for pulleys welded to inside of box, with pulleys on• Cable tie-off welded to outside of box• Positioning hanger with locating hole welded to top of box

Peak Performance Engineering

Individual Parts

• Nylon 6/6 reinforced with glass fibers• Material injection molded to create part

• Nylon 6/6 reinforced with glass fibers• Material injection molded to create part• Rubber attached at end for sealing purposes

Peak Performance Engineering

Individual Parts

• Square aluminum tubing• Holes drilled and ends bent for attachment to Resistance Box

• Aluminum sheet metal• Bent to desired shape• Slots machined on sides for cable• Holes machined on end for buttons• Holes drilled for attachments

Peak Performance Engineering

Bill of Materials

Performance Analysis

• Engineering Models–Piston-Cylinder Model–Pulley-Weight System–Spring System–Exercise Wheel Design

Piston-Cylinder Model

• Resistance generated by vacuum.• Force is constant at absolute vacuum.• Vacuum maintained by vacuum seal.• Maximum force corresponds to diameter

of piston. F=P*π*r2

• Several cylinders used for resistance skill level.

Peak Performance Engineering

Assembly

Parameter Variation

Peak Performance Engineering

hi ≈ 0

di = 1.32”

F = 20lb

Vi ≈ 0 F = P * A A = π * r2 r = di / 2

Assumptions: Pressure inside piston starts at 1 atm, and density is 1.18 kg/m

3. Dynamic Vacuum seal on piston Constant room temperature

Piston/Cylinder Model

Peak Performance Engineering

Comparison Benchmarks

Benchmark - Cap Barbell Home Gym System

- Model outperformed or met customer requirements the same as the Cap Home Gym. (150 lbs vs. 180lbs)

- Reparability, the only issue for customer requirements.

Peak Performance Engineering

Pulley System Model

F F

F

mg

• Elaborate Pulley System

● Basic Configuration: Force-driven cable connected at one end to external surface, with the cable being wrapped around a pulley linked to a mass.

● Assumptions: Frictionless pulley, constant gravitational acceleration (9.81m/s^2), massless cables, massless pulley.

Peak Performance Engineering

Basic Calculations: (2 pulley configuration)

Fx = 0 Ax = 0Fy = 2F – mg = 0 F = (mg) / 2 (m)Ay = 2F – mg

Ay = ((2F) / m ) – g

For

ce

mg

Pulley System Model

Peak Performance Engineering

Peak Performance Engineering

Assembly

Comparison Benchmarks

Benchmark - Cap Barbell Home Gym System● Net weight of concept exercise device lower than Cap Barbell Home Gym. (170 lbs vs. 300lbs)● The ability of foldable bench legs helps in storage under beds or other furniture.

Peak Performance Engineering

Assembly Efficiency

• Goal: Maximize production efficiency, Minimize cost.

• Solution: Design for Assembly worksheet– Pinpoint faults, areas for improvement.– Obtain a DFA score

Peak Performance Engineering

First DFA Worksheet

46

01610128

Peak Performance Engineering

DFA Evaluation

• Improvements in overall assembly, part retrieval and part mating.

• Steps to implementation– Single pulley sizes– Lighter materials– Chamfers, round edges– Hinged legs

Peak Performance Engineering

3612

66

20

16

Second DFA Worksheet

Peak Performance Engineering

Assembly Efficiency

• Simple assembly for consumer.– Leg Hinges– Leg Extension Bar– Exterior Pulleys– Rail and Box Assembly

Peak Performance Engineering

Economic Analysis

• Purpose: Evaluate financial effectiveness of our product.

• Established Financial Analysis Diagram.

Peak Performance Engineering

Peak Performance Engineering

Peak Performance Engineering

Peak Performance Engineering

Other Calculations

• Net Return on Investment: 55.6%• Net Rate of Return: 76.9%• Break-even Thresholds:

– Quarter 7– 4,488 units (assuming interest)

Peak Performance Engineering

Conclusions

• Unparallel total body workout in a compact design.– Strong niche in current market.

• Met or surpassed customer needs• Very profitable, low risk, investment• Conservative sales assumptions, great

entry opportunity

Peak Performance Engineering

Recommended