Ex on density group 6

I exercise:on densityCUSCO CITY BLOCK

Politecnico di Torino CDL Magistrale architettura,costruzione e cittàUP:Cusco sun cityArchitecture: Pierre Alain CrosetUrban planning:Angelo SampieriScience of materials:Simonella Pagliolico

group 6Mirko MantovanAntonello DeliaMargot Robin

I exercise:on densityCUSCO CITY BLOCK

Block 6-WANCHAQ area

1-urban analysis

2002

2012

Politecnico di Torino CDL Magistrale architettura,costruzione e cittàUP:Cusco sun cityArchitecture: Pierre Alain CrosetUrban planning:Angelo SampieriScience of materials:Simonella Pagliolico

group 6Mirko MantovanAntonello DeliaMargot Robin

I exercise:on densityCUSCO CITY BLOCK

1-urban analysis

1

1

12

3

2

3

I exercise:on densityCUSCO CITY BLOCK

2- survey-CURRENT STATEsite plan-scale 1:500

2- survey-CURRENT STATE

I exercise:on densityCUSCO CITY BLOCK

site plan-scale 1:500

elevation from Quinto Paradero street

elevation from 28 Des Julio

QO

SCO

STR

EET

28 Des Julio street

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

1

3

5

7

9

11

13

15

17

19

21

23

25

27

29

LOT SURFACE [m 2] BUILDINGS HEIGHT [m] LEVELS BUILDING SURFACE [m 2]

1a 6 2 69,9

1b 3 1 39,03

2a 6 2 73,87

2b 3 1 93,6

5a 6 2 68,46

5b 3 1 38,78

6a 6 2 49,43

6b 3 1 32,94

7a 6 2 70,14

7b 3 1 53,31

8a 6 2 83,12

8b 3 1 68,65

9a 18 6 164,93

9b 3 1 44,47

10a 6 2 79,18

10b 3 1 47,73

11a 6 2 67,87

11b 3 1 51,05

12a 9 3 97,75

12b 6 2 51,53

14a 6 2 58,52

14b 3 1 52,25

15a 6 2 67,59

15b 3 1 50,47

17a 9 3 69,02

17b 6 2 77,82

18a 15 5 99,32

1

BLOOK 6 SURVEY

313a 143,46

169,09

50,68

21 716a206,0516

11

12

211,92

199,13

13

205,1118

8

9

219,59

210,9514

212,5515

17 211,94

211,07

210,84

78,7

204,8410

1 212,10

2 208,91

213,295

6

3a208,503 3 1

4 202,54 4a 26

7

202,27

220,27

18b 6 2 22,88

24a 18 6 100,32

24b 6 2 52,13

26a 9 3 39,31

26b 3 1 59,69

29a 12 4 63,9

29b 3 1 156,13

30a 6 2 131,5130b 3 1 63,49

TOT 6508,29

99,6

97,42

89,29

3

20a 2 126,09

219a 6

6

113,41

94,51

173,47

171,127

26

21

21a

22a

27a 9 3

23a 6

30

29

28

27

26

25 215,93

210,31

220,42

212,03

311,43

300,52

2

925a

28a 13

205,3622

23 215,95

205,5124

19

20

21 213,51

208,00

217,45

205,1118

FOOT PRINT SURFACE [m2] VOLUME [m 3] SLP[m 2] COEFFICIENTE DE EDIFICATION

419,4

117,09

443,22

280,8

410,76

116,34

296,58

98,82

420,84

159,93

498,72

205,95

2968,74

133,41

475,08

143,19

407,22

153,15

879,75

309,18

351,12

156,75

405,54

151,41

621,18

466,92

1489,8

BLOOK 6 SURVEY

0,78

3550,89 1183,63 5,74

152,04 50,68 0,24

472,2

178,83

241,34

175,7

131,8

193,59

157,4

234,89

1034,05

206,09

186,79

396,31

143,46

169,29

185,65

362,7

542,36

0,84

1,16

0,82

0,65

0,88

1,11

4,90

1,01

0,88

1,99

0,65

0,80

0,87

1,71

2,64

108,93

167,47

50,68

78,70

107,24

82,37

123,45

151,77

209,40

126,91

118,92

149,28

143,46

110,77

118,06

169,09

146,84

430,38

137,28

1805,76

312,78

353,79

179,07

766,8

468,39

789,06190,47

3916,93 30869,25 10289,75 1,58

567,06 189,02 0,88

1040,82 346,94 1,62

3593,52 1197,84 5,83

298,8

89,29

411,73

896,4

267,87

1,04

1,21

226,82

252,18

706,18

292,26

1,36

0,42

1,32

1,09326,51

680,46

122,20

113,41

126,09

173,47

171,12

94,51

152,45

97,42

99,00

3,44

1,35

0,84

756,54

876,78

177,62

99,60

89,29

220,03

195,00

EDIFICATION PERCENTAGE

82,1%

BLOOK 6 SURVEY

24,3%

38,9%

51,4%

80,2%

50,3%

40,7%

56,0%

71,9%

99,3%

62,0%

56,1%

75,0%

65,3%

52,5%

55,5%

69,3%

59,6%

60,18%

81,2%

60,6%

74,2%

45,1%

47,1%

83,3%

43,8%

45,2%

42,1%

70,7%

64,9%

59,6%

52,2%

I exercise:on densityCUSCO CITY BLOCK

axonometric view-north

site plan-scale 1:500

I exercise:on densityCUSCO CITY BLOCK

axonometric view-south

3-densification hypotesis

UNGERS -ROOSVELT ISLAND

main points:-combination of morphological range of models with the ideas on variety within unity and the city in minia-ture.-Assembling theme,fragmentation,”the house inside the house”.-Open block development Christian Portzanparc

references

IPOTESE 1-50%

TOT SURFACE:6508,29 m²FOOT PRINT SURFACE:3797,73 m²VOLUME:41439,38 m3SLP:13904,66 m²COEFFICIENTE DI EDIFICATION:2,14EDIFICATION PERCENTAGE: 58,35%

The block was arranged following 2 factors:-the street hierarchy- existing building typology and building arrangement

The goal here was to maintain the existing building height considering Ungers as reference for what concerns the assembing block

Definition of the corner through the building heightCreation of a uniform front towards the new boulevard

Work on the courts typology,redefinition of the C shape,creation of new enlarged spaces using the modular type.

site plan-scale 1:500

IPOTESE 1-50%

axonometric view-north west

IPOTESE 1-50%

IPOTESE 1-50%

axonometric view-south east

IPOTESE 2-50%

The block was arranged following 1 factors:- the existing building typology and building arrangementIn this case we lost the tall building defining the angle as in the first hypotesisHere the aim is to mantain theliear configuration of the inear building type-considering their rhytm and the cohexistence with low density building placed in between

Working on a new arrangement,scattered on the new boulevard and creation of a linear front on the other sidpermitting the creation of private internal spaces

TOT SURFACE:6508,29 m²FOOT PRINT SURFACE:3596,03m²VOLUME:40336,80 m3SLP:13445,60 m²COEFFICIENTE DI EDIFICATION:2,07EDIFICATION PERCENTAGE: 55,25%

site plan-scale 1:500

IPOTESE 2-50%

axonometric view-north west

IPOTESE 2-50%

axonometric view-south east

IPOTESE 1-100%

IPOTESE 2-50%

The block was arranged following 2 factors:-the street hierarchy- existing building typology and building arrangement

The importance of the corner formed by via 28 Des Julio and Qosco street has been stressed by the building height

Via 28 Des Julio has the potential of becoming a boulevard that’s why the height is maintained,but the buildings now are conceived as scattered elements in order to continue the following arrangementsThe other side of the block presented an interesting disposition of the open and closed court type,since the street is more private the work focused on this specific building type

To improve visibility the buildings facing the street are lower and are conceived to be single residetial houses while the one located inside the block are heigher.

TOT SURFACE:6508,29 m²FOOT PRINT SURFACE:3703,07m²VOLUME:40001,85 m3SLP:13657,99 m²COEFFICIENTE DI EDIFICATION:2,10EDIFICATION PERCENTAGE: 56,90%

plan view-scale 1:500

IPOTESE 1-100%

IPOTESE 1-100%

plan view-scale 1:500

axonometric view-north west

IPOTESE 1-100%

IPOTESE 1-100%

axonometric view-south east