View
229
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Evaluating Media Characteristics
Using multimedia to achieve learning outcomes
Definition
A means of effecting or conveying something
A channel of communication A condition/environment permitting
something to flourish
Overview
Text Audio Visuals Video Software Live/F2F Collaborative Integration
Role of Text
Positives: Surveyable Easy to produce Low bandwidth Familiar Many readers Not much
specialization
Negatives: Overused Passive 100% learner
motivation Time lag
Text
Our experience Paper and digital Manuals Chat, discussion Learning materials Knowledge sharing – i.e. “blogging”
Text
Learning outcomes Simple to complex Suited to synthesis/evaluation Reflection – due to time lag
Role of Audio
Positives: Two-way interaction Enrich a text only course Useful for explanations,
accessibility, pronunciations
Great for auditory learners
Speed – faster than typing (and less inhibitive)
Negatives: Easy to tune out Text read – limits
pace – user needs to be able to disable
Need professional “voice”
Extended audio needs to be indexed – time/expense
Audio
Our experience VoIP – PalTalk, Groove Polycom Audio pronunciations
Audio
Learning outcomes Across spectrum Presentation Explanations Dialogue Analysis Synthesis
Role of Visuals
Positives: Abundance Low cost (if using
clipart/digital camera) Versatile – use for any
learning task Low bandwidth (if done
right) Enrich learning
material
Negatives: Can be poor quality Motion/animation can
be expensive Time consuming Involved if using
graphic artist
Visuals
Our experience Digital pictures Graphics – Internet Graphic artist – designing Enriches text – “picture is worth a
thousand words” Animations
Visuals
Learning outcomes Knowledge Comprehension Explanations Demonstrations Conceptualizing abstract concepts Contrasting
Role of Video
Positives: Visual Personal medium Many viewers/large
audience Detail complex tasks Ability to review Increased variety –
CD, Streaming
Negatives: Specialized team –
i.e. producer, editor, camera
Expensive Not easy to modify Sequential, difficult to
survey Passive
Video
Our experience Culinary Arts – 7 Courses Build sets, editing, reviewing Interruptions in “live taping” Instructor time commitment CD ROM Streaming – 3 month course
Video
Learning outcomes Demonstrations Explanations Lecture Complex – i.e. whiteboard – physics
problem solving Two way (expensive) – instructor
observes student
Software
Positives: Simulation Self-paced Re-usable Team based Memorable Game-like –
“edutainment”
Negatives: Expensive Time consuming Complex to design Team based Added complexity
for learners
Software
Our experience HTML, Java, Flash, Authorware, Hot
Potatoes, LMS (TLM & WebCT) Simulations Guided lessons Always multi-discipline project Student response - excellent
Software
Learning outcomes Demonstrations Knowledge Broad knowledge Practice complex skill in safe
environment Synthesis
Live/F2F
Positives: Highly interactive Familiar – students
and instructors Effective Proven history Can incorporate
other media
Negatives: Only synchronous Expensive No “knowledge”
trail Limited audience
size Not surveyable
Live/F2F
Our experience Classrooms Lecture theatres Hey…we’re college instructors…
what more can we say!
Live/F2F
Learning outcomes Everything Main determinant of success is the
skill of the instructor
Collaboration:(As a media format)
Positives: Knowledge building Communities Student to student Time on task Ideal for online
environment Supplements other
media
Negatives: Takes time – not ideal
for short-course training
Difficult to do Change required of
student and instructor
Collaborative
Our experience Groove Communityzero Slow social acceptance Too unfamiliar Much rather talk about it than do it…
over-hyped, under done Control is dispersed to everyone
Collaborative
Learning outcomes Explanation/demonstration Higher order Synthesis, evaluation Deep learning, not surface Multiple perspectives
Integration
Positives: Combine best
features, minimize weaknesses
Enriched learning Asynchronous Synchronous
Negatives: Instructors have to
combine tools to achieve outcomes
“Ideal” elearning tool doesn’t exist yet
Media Integration
Contact us
George Siemensgsiemens@elearnspace.org
204 632 2141Steve Yurkiw
Syurkiw@rrc.mb.ca204 632 2598
Recommended