View
224
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
1/24
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
2/24
Does not Vatican $$ here affirm precisel! that which /ius $>& citing 9regor! >V$& calls a
deliramentum "his ostensile contradiction madeDignitatis !uman" the most contro*ersial
document at the Council. So man! douts were raised aout the first three schemata that =l. /ope
/aul V$ decided to dela! *oting on it& mo*ing the *ote from the third to the fourth and final session
of the Council.[5]0t this a large group of council fathers protested& egging the /ope with the *er!
greatest urgenc! )instanter& instantius& instantissimus'7 to re*erse his decision& lest pulic opinion
turn against the Council.[2](e*ertheless& the *ote did not ta'e place till the *er! end of the lastsession.[3]
0fter the Council the Euestion of the relation ofDignitatis !uman" to pre*ious teachings remained
contro*ersial.[4]0n! interpretation ofDignitatis !uman" has to deal with this Euestion& and
interpreters ha*e proposed *arious approaches that all gi*e different answers to the EuestionFfrom
the assertion of a radical rea' with tradition to that of complete continuit! with tradition. $ shall
now consider se*eral answers that $ consider inadeEuate /art $7 efore turning to an e:planation
and defense of the answer proposed ! the %nglish philosopher "homas /in' /art $$7. 0ccording to
/in' there is continuit! at the le*el of principles& ut discontinuit! at the le*el of Church polic!
toward the state. #e shows this first ! gi*ing a new interpretation of the condemnation of religious
freedom on the part of the popes of the /ian 0ge& showing its roots in counter-Reformation politicaltheolog!. 0nd then he applies 'e! distinctions ta'en from that anal!sis toDignitatis !uman"
0fter e:plaining /in'$$$
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
3/24
reformale. "he! argue that onl! the most solemn definitions of the agisterium are infallile& and
that man! )authentic+ teachings of the Church are not finall! inding. "hus Reinhold Seott& S.I.&
argues as follows?
$f we do not consider #uanta $ura infallile& then of course we will not consider a great
man! other magisterial decisions infallile. Onl! *er! few teachings can e descried as
dogmas in the strict sense.[1]
Such positions ha*e een used not onl! to Hustif! a hermeneutic of rupture in the reading of Vatican
$$& ut also to put into Euestion much of the Church
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
4/24
worship 9od& has to do with immunit! from coercion in ci*il societ!. "herefore it lea*es
untouched traditional Catholic doctrine on the moral dut! of men and societies toward
the true religion and toward the one Church of Christ.[65]
0mong the duties of societies toward true religion& Storc' includes the limiting of the spread of
false religions ! wa! of censorship and such measures& as called for ! the 14 thcentur! popes.[62]
"hus Storc' mo*es the apparent contradiction intoDignitatis !uman" itself. =ut he finds a 'e! tounderstanding wh! the contradiction is onl! apparent ! his interpretation of the )due limits+ on
religious freedom mentioned in the central statement ofDignitatis !uman"6? )no one is to e
forced to act in a manner contrar! to his own eliefs& whether pri*atel! or pulicl!& whether alone
or in association with others& within due limits.+Dignitatis !uman"2 further e:plicates these
limits. "he e:ercise of religious liert! must )respect oth for the rights of others and for their own
duties toward others and for the common welfare [bonum commune] of all.+ "he state is reEuired to
preser*e )genuine pulic peace& which comes aout when men li*e together in good order and in
true Hustice+ and )pulic moralit!.+ Storc' argues that preser*ation of the bonum commune of a
Christian societ! would in practice allow for *er! hea*! restrictions on religious freedom?
the )Hust reEuirements of pulic order&+ the )due limits&+ and considerations of the rightsof others and of the common good *ar! consideral! from societ! to societ!& and that in
a societ! o*erwhelmingl! and traditionall! Catholic the! could easil! include
restrictions& and e*en an outright prohiition& on the pulic acti*ities of non-Catholic
sects& particularl! on their prosel!ti8ing acti*ities.[63]
0ccording to Storc'& the condemnation of religious freedom in earlier ages of the Church was not
the complete denial of any such right&ut rather the denial of an unlimited right. [64]On his
interpretation pre*ious teachings were not concerned with the pri*ate right of persons to elie*e
what the! thought to e true& ut rather precisel! with the necessit! for pulic order of limiting the
spread of false religion?
0 non-Catholic has the real right& e*en in a Catholic state& to pri*atel! profess his own
religion and pri*atel! meet with his co-religionistsB in a lieral regime he has a right to
consideral! more freedom. $n oth cases the freedom is real& simpl! that the
)reEuirements of pulic order+ and of the common good differ.[;G]
$ do not thin' that Storc'
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
5/24
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
6/24
ma'e use of the state as bracchium s"cularefor such coercion. #e thin's thatDignitatis !uman"
corrects pre*ious teaching on )the mission and function of the state.+[;4],hile certain pre*ious
popes taught that the state must suordinate itself to the Church&Dignitatis !uman" denies this and
demands a legitimate secularit! for the state. "his is not a rea' with principles deri*ed from Sacred
Scripture or the 0postolic tradition& which according to Rhonheimer )suggest a separation etween
the political and religious spheres.+[@G]=ut it is a rea' with earlier and less perfect applications of
those principles. Rhonheimer argues thatDignitatis !uman"stands at the end of a long processthrough which the Church re-disco*ers the original meaning of the IesusV$& )-.pergiscere !omo? 0ddress to the College of Cardinals and the
Roman Curia&+ Decemer 66& 6GG& in?Acta Apostolic" )edis 4&1 6GG57 @G-;B translation?
http?www.*atican.*ahol!fatherenedict:*ispeeches6GGdecemerdocumentshfen:*ispe6GG1666roman-curiaen.htmlaccessed (o*emer 14& 6G1@7.
[;]See? artin Rhonheimer& $hristentum und s/+ularer )taatreiurg ;6G167 1;@-1;4& 1@;B
%erhard Schoc'enhoff& PDas Recht& ungehindert die ,ahrheit 8u suchen? Die %r'lQrung er die
ReligionsfreiheitDignitatis humanae&) in? Ian-#einer "c' ed.7&-rinnerung an die 0u+unft% Das
1weite vati+anische 2on1il& 3ndedreiurg 6G1;7 2G6.
[@]Dignitatis !umanae& 6& in?Acta Apostolic" )edis 3 14557 464-4@5& at 4;GB translation?
http?www.*atican.*aarchi*ehistcouncilsii*aticancouncildocuments*at-
iidecl14516G2dignitatis-humanaeen.htmlaccessed (o*emer 14& 6G1@7.
[]/ope /ius $>& #uanta $ura& in? #erert Vaughan ed.7& The 4ear of 5reparation for the Vatican$ouncil% Including the (riginal and -nglish of the -ncyclical and )yllabus& and of the 5apal
Documents $onnected with its $onvocation London 13547 i*-::& at *iii.
[5]See? /ietro /a*an& %inleitung 8ur %r'lQrung er die Religionsfreiheit& in? Le:i'onf6r
Theologie und 2irche& 6nded.& %rgQn8ungsand $$ reiurg 14527 2G5-2G2.
[2]See? /a*an& %inleitung 2G5.
[3]See? /a*an& %inleitung 2G4-211.
[4]See? Schoc'enhoff& )Das Recht+ 2G;.
[1G]=enedict >V$&-.pergiscere !omo@5.[11]=enedict >V$&-.pergiscere !omo@5.
[16]See? Chad C. /ec'nold& )/ope =enedict
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
7/24
Reflections on "heological ethod&+ presentation atReform and Renewal% Vatican II After 78
4ears& S!mposium at "he Catholic Mni*ersit! of 0merica& ,ashington DC& Septemer 65-64& 6G16?
http?!outu.eTi$5INeV0accessed (o*emer 13& 6G1@7.
[1;]=enedict >V$&-.pergiscere !omo@2.
[1@]See? Schoc'enhoff& )Das Recht+ 56;-56. Schoc'enhoff mentions %rnst-,olfgang
=Uc'enfUrde& Jlaus Schat8& ran8 >a*er =ischof& and Iosef $nsensee as e:amples.[1]),enn man C uanta cura7 nicht als unfehlar Eualifi8iert& dann wird man natrlich auch
eine enge anderer Lehrentscheidungen nicht als unfehlar Eualifi8ieren drfen. Der Jreis des
Dogmas muss also sehr eng ge8ogen werden.+ Reinhold Seott& )Dignitatis humanW und uanta
cura? Die Verurteilung der Religionsfreiheit *or dem Nweiten Vati'anischen Jon8il&+ in? /.
=oe'holt and $. Riedel-Spangenerger ed.7&Iustitia et 9odestiaunich 14437 13;-146B at 146.
[15]See? Ianet %. Smith& #umanW VitW& a 9eneration Later ,ashington 14437 especiall! 1-154.
[12]Seott& )Dignitatis humanW+ 146.
[13]See? Congregation for the Doctrine of the aith& )Doctrinal Commentar! on the Concluding
ormula of the /rofessio idei&+ online access?http?www.*atican.*aromancuriacongregationscfaithdocumentsrcconcfaithdoc1443profe
ssio-fideien.htmlaccessed 61 (o*emer& 6G1@7.
[14]See? 0*er! Cardinal Dulles& )De*elopment Or Re*ersal+ in?:irst Things Octoer 6GG7 ;-
51.
[6G]arcel Lefe*re& )Duia sur la DXclaration conciliaire sur la liertX religieuse& prXsentXs Y la
S.C.R. pour la Doctrine de la oi&+ %cZne& (o*emeer 5& 143?
http?lacriseintegriste.t!pepad.frduia.pdfaccessed Octoer 13& 6G1@7B %nglish translation?
Religious Liberty #uestioned Jansas Cit! 6GG17.
[61]Congregation for the Doctrine of the aith& )LiertX religieuse? RXponse au: Duia prXsentXs
par S.%. gr Lefe*re&+ Rome& arch 4& 1432? http?lacriseintegriste.t!pepad.frwelog1432G;rC;04ponses-de-la-congrC;04gation-pour-la-doctrine-de-la-foi-au:-duia-prC;04sent
C;04s-par-mgr-lefe*re.htmlaccessed (o*emer 61& 6G1@7.
[66]See the documentation collected at the wesiteLa crise int;griste?
http?lacriseintegriste.t!pepad.frwelogle-dialogue-a*ec-Heanpaul-ii-14231432.htmland
http?lacriseintegriste.t!pepad.frwelogle-schisme-14336GGG.htmloth accessed (o*emer 61&
6G1@7.
[6;])%n fournissant une interprXtation personnelle des te:tes du agist\re& *ous ferie8
parado:alement preu*e de ce liXralisme Eue *ous comatte8 si fortement& et agirie8 contre le ut
Eue *ous poursui*e8.+ Letter of Ioseph Cardinal Rat8inger to 0rchishop arcel Lefe*re& Iul! 63&
1432? http?lacriseintegriste.t!pepad.frwelog1432G2lettre-du-car.htmlaccessed (o*emer 61&
6G1@7.
[6@])%s stellt sich een die rage& wie D# [Dignitatis humanW] an'ommen soll gegen die er
Iahrhunderte *erindlich *orgetragene Lehre& und 8war *or dem #intergrund 'irchenamtlich
gestt8ter /ra:is& wonach es gerade 'ein natrliches Recht git& 8umal Uffentlich7 unehelligt *on
der staatlichen 9ewalt das Dissidententum 8u pra'ti8ieren. $ch sage? Pes stellt sich die rage& wie).
Mnd eantwortet ist die is 8ur Stunde nicht.+ Jlaus Oenauer& )/iusruderschaft? Der angehaltene
Nug oder? ,ie e'ommt man das Signal wieder auf 9rn+
http?www.'atholisches.info6G161161piusruderschaft-der-angehaltene-8ug-oder-wie-e'ommt-
man-das-signal-wieder-auf-grunaccessed Octoer 13& 6G1@7.
[6]Some other e:amples are mentioned ! Schoc'enhoff )Das Recht+ 262-2637& including
0rthur Mt8& Roert Spaemann& =asil Valuet& and =etrand de argerie.
http://youtu.be/YiI_6JZebVAhttp://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref13http://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref14http://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref15http://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref16http://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref17http://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref18http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_1998_professio-fidei_en.htmlhttp://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_1998_professio-fidei_en.htmlhttp://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref19http://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref20http://lacriseintegriste.typepad.fr/dubia.pdfhttp://lacriseintegriste.typepad.fr/dubia.pdfhttp://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref21http://lacriseintegriste.typepad.fr/weblog/1987/03/r%C3%A9ponses-de-la-congr%C3%A9gation-pour-la-doctrine-de-la-foi-aux-dubia-pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9s-par-mgr-lefebvre.htmlhttp://lacriseintegriste.typepad.fr/weblog/1987/03/r%C3%A9ponses-de-la-congr%C3%A9gation-pour-la-doctrine-de-la-foi-aux-dubia-pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9s-par-mgr-lefebvre.htmlhttp://lacriseintegriste.typepad.fr/weblog/1987/03/r%C3%A9ponses-de-la-congr%C3%A9gation-pour-la-doctrine-de-la-foi-aux-dubia-pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9s-par-mgr-lefebvre.htmlhttp://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref22http://lacriseintegriste.typepad.fr/weblog/le-dialogue-avec-jeanpaul-ii-19781987.htmlhttp://lacriseintegriste.typepad.fr/weblog/le-schisme-19882000.htmlhttp://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref23http://lacriseintegriste.typepad.fr/weblog/1987/07/lettre-du-car.htmlhttp://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref24http://www.katholisches.info/2012/11/21/piusbruderschaft-der-angehaltene-zug-oder-wie-bekommt-man-das-signal-wieder-auf-grun/http://www.katholisches.info/2012/11/21/piusbruderschaft-der-angehaltene-zug-oder-wie-bekommt-man-das-signal-wieder-auf-grun/http://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref25http://youtu.be/YiI_6JZebVAhttp://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref13http://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref14http://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref15http://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref16http://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref17http://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref18http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_1998_professio-fidei_en.htmlhttp://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_1998_professio-fidei_en.htmlhttp://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref19http://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref20http://lacriseintegriste.typepad.fr/dubia.pdfhttp://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref21http://lacriseintegriste.typepad.fr/weblog/1987/03/r%C3%A9ponses-de-la-congr%C3%A9gation-pour-la-doctrine-de-la-foi-aux-dubia-pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9s-par-mgr-lefebvre.htmlhttp://lacriseintegriste.typepad.fr/weblog/1987/03/r%C3%A9ponses-de-la-congr%C3%A9gation-pour-la-doctrine-de-la-foi-aux-dubia-pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9s-par-mgr-lefebvre.htmlhttp://lacriseintegriste.typepad.fr/weblog/1987/03/r%C3%A9ponses-de-la-congr%C3%A9gation-pour-la-doctrine-de-la-foi-aux-dubia-pr%C3%A9sent%C3%A9s-par-mgr-lefebvre.htmlhttp://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref22http://lacriseintegriste.typepad.fr/weblog/le-dialogue-avec-jeanpaul-ii-19781987.htmlhttp://lacriseintegriste.typepad.fr/weblog/le-schisme-19882000.htmlhttp://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref23http://lacriseintegriste.typepad.fr/weblog/1987/07/lettre-du-car.htmlhttp://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref24http://www.katholisches.info/2012/11/21/piusbruderschaft-der-angehaltene-zug-oder-wie-bekommt-man-das-signal-wieder-auf-grun/http://www.katholisches.info/2012/11/21/piusbruderschaft-der-angehaltene-zug-oder-wie-bekommt-man-das-signal-wieder-auf-grun/http://thejosias.com/2014/12/31/religious-liberty-and-tradition-i/#_ftnref258/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
8/24
[65]Dignitatis !uman" 1B cf. "homas Storc'&:oundations of a $atholic 5olitical (rder
=elts*ille 14437 62.
[62]Storc'&:oundations61-65.
[63]Storc'&:oundations63-64.
[64]Storc'&:oundations64? )an
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
9/24
Religious Liberty and Tradition IIThis is the second of four parts of an essay on the interpretation of Vatican IIs Declaration on
Religious Liberty& Dignitatis !uman"5art I considered inade*uate interpretations
Part II: Thomas Pin!"s #rea!through"he %nglish philosopher "homas /in' has recentl! de*eloped a new account ofDignitatis
!uman"s continuit! and discontinuit! with pre*ious teaching.[1]/in' is an e:pert on the
philosoph! of "homas #oes 13315247& and it was #oes that led him to a new approach to
the prolem. One of #oes
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
10/24
,e must distinguish etween those who ha*e alwa!s een outside the Church& namel!
infidels and Iews& and those who ha*e suHected themsel*es to her through =aptism.
"he former ought not to e compelled to profess the Catholic aith& the later howe*er
are to e coerced sunt cogendi7. St. "homas pro*es this with his usual solidit!.[4]
During the Counter Reformation such teachings were used to Hustif! coercing /rotestants to accept
the Catholic faith. Since there is onl! one =aptism& apti8ed /rotestants are suHect to theHurisdiction of the Catholic Church.[1G]0s /in' points out& one can of course Euestion the prudence
and moralit! of the inEuisitorial methods of appl!ing this teaching& ut such Euestioning need not
necessaril! entail a reHection of the teaching itself.[11]
"he idea that persons should e coerced not onl! in their e:ternal actions& ut e*en in the *er! act of
faith itself is unusual toda!. /in' shows that the influence of the philosophies of #oes and Loc'e
ha*e had an important role in ma'ing such an idea seem strange. #oes and Loc'e argue that such
coercion ought to e foridden de ?ureecause it is impossile de facto[16]=ut according to
scholastic philosoph! legal coercion has a pedagogical function&[1;]and therefore it can help
persons to accept the truth. Since =aptism infuses the *irtue of faith& coercion need not necessaril!
lead to h!pocris!. Coercion can force the apti8ed to e:amine the e*idence of the faith.$n e:ercising coercion the Church has historicall! made use of the right to use the temporal power
as an instrument or organ secular arm7. "his does not howe*er impl! that the temporal power was
seen as ha*ing a nati*e Hurisdiction in religious matters. $nsofar as the temporal power acts as an
instrument of the Church it is precisel! not acting on its nati*e authorit!. $n the 14thcentur! this
distinction was *er! emphaticall! taught ! /ope Leo >$$$?
"he 0lmight!& therefore& has gi*en the charge of the human race to two powers& the
ecclesiastical and the ci*il& the one eing set o*er di*ine& and the other o*er human&
things. [K] ,hate*er& therefore in things human is of a sacred character& whate*er
elongs either of its own nature or ! reason of the end to which it is referred& to the
sal*ation of souls& or to the worship of 9od& is suHect to the power and Hudgment of theChurch. ,hate*er is to e ranged under the ci*il and political order is rightl! suHect to
the ci*il authorit!.[1@]
"hus the temporal power has no authority whatsoever in religious matters. (e*ertheless& this does
not e:clude the temporal power acting as an agent of the Church in such matters.
$n the light of this distinction /in' can show the continuit! ofDignitatis !uman" with pre*ious
teaching or precious teaching would agree that in religion e*er!one should e )immune from
coercion on the part of indi*iduals or of social groups and of an! human power&+ Dignitatis
!uman" 67 if )human power+ is ta'en to mean worldl! or temporal power. "husDignitatis
!uman" ; is entirel! traditional when it teaches that )religious acts+ )transcend ! their *er!
nature the order of terrestrialand temporalaffairs&+ and that the state would )transgress the limits
set to its power&+ were it to command or forid such acts.[1]
=ut such a statement aout the limits of the authorit! of the temporal power in no wa! restricts the
authorit! of the Church. orDignitatis !uman" e:plicitl! states that it is treating of )immunit!
from coercion in ci*il societ!+ and lea*ing untouched traditional teaching on duties toward the
Church& and therefore ! implication the rights of the Church.[15]So on /in'
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
11/24
here& nor is the Euestion of freedom within the Church herself.+[13]
=ut& /in' argues& ! not mentioning the right of the Church to ma'e use of the state as secular arm
Dignitatis !uman" changes Church polic!. "hat is& the Church no longer ma'es use of that rightB
she no longer authori8es the temporal power to act as her agent?
the Church
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
12/24
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
13/24
Religious Liberty and Tradition IIIThis is the third of four parts of an essay on the interpretation of Vatican IIs Declaration on
Religious Liberty& Dignitatis !uman"5art Iconsidered inade*uate interpretationsC5art II
considered Thomas 5in+s interpretive brea+through
Part III: $piritual and temporal po%er: a
glance at history"he ancient world did not distinguish etween spiritual and worldl! power. $n the 9ree' cit!-states
and later in Rome the worship of the gods was an important element of political or imperial life& and
was therefore considered to fall under political or imperial authorit!. 0ristotle considers worship to
e an essential function of thepolis? )ifthl!& or rather first& there must e a care of religion& which
is commonl! called worship.+[1]0lthough the Romans distinguished etween res divina and res
publica these two were not distinct powers with distinct endsB[6]the function of di*ine worship waslargel! to secure politicalimperial success.[;]0ncient $srael re*ersed this orderB the worship of
9od is the primar! thing to which all of life is suordinated. =ut here too there was no distinction
etween spiritual and temporal power.[@]
"he distinction etween spiritual and temporal or worldl! power was an inno*ation of Christianit!.
0nd& as Rhonheimer argues& it was ale to ma'e this distinction ecause Christianit! is a religion of
redemption.[]Christianit! did not den! the legitimac! of the e:isting political order& it recogni8ed
therein an authorit! founded in 9od
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
14/24
allow for a role of the temporal power in helping to preser*e the true faith. "hus the imperial power
was used to suppress the 0rian heres!.[1G]Rhonheimer considers the )enthusiasm+ with which the
athers saw worldl! power as an instrument of orthodo:! prolematic and )astonishing&+ ut his
astonishment rests on apetitio principii.[11]$t is onl! ecause Rhonheimer first interprets the
direct (ew "estament deri*ation of worldl! power from 9od as )so*ereignt!+ and )independence
of religious claims to ordering authorit!+[16]that the patristic willingness to ma'e use of the state
as an instrument for the suppression of heres! seems wrong to him. =ut one should rather ta'e thepatristic application of (ew "estament principles as an authoritati*e guide to meaning of those
principles.
"he sac' of Rome ! the Visigoths in @1G seemed to man! Romans to e a refutation of
Christianit!. Clearl! Christianit! was not ale fulfill the classic function of religion? preser*ing the
cit! from catastrophe. St 0ugustine answered this argument in his great wor' The $ity of God "he
true religion does not e:ist for the sa'e of securing the transitor! order of this world& ut rather for
the sa'e of uilding up the Cit! of 9od& which will onl! e full! reali8ed after the passing of this
world. "he Cit! of 9od is founded on a lo*e of 9od that leads its citi8ens to contempt for
themsel*es& counting all earthl! things as worthless.[1;]"hus 9od allows )temporal+ catastrophes
to distur the reign of Christian rulers& thus teaching all not to ser*e 9od for the sa'e of worldl!ad*antages $iv Dei V&67. 0ugustine argues that temporal ought to e ordered to eternal ones $iv
Dei >$>&127& ut that this ordering will ne*er e achie*ed entirel! harmoniousl! till the second
coming of the Lord. or& there is a second cit! here on earth in addition to the cit! of 9odF the
civitas terrena& the earthl! cit!. "his cit! is founded on a lo*e of self to the contempt of 9od $iv
Dei >$V&637. 0nd these two cities are in conflict. 0lthough oth cities are for different reasons7
interested in conser*ing temporal peace& so that a limited cooperation etween them in temporal
matters is possile $iv Dei >$>&127& ne*ertheless& this cannot e ta'en as allowing for a neutral
temporal realm& as Rhonheimer would ha*e itB[1@]"he earthl! cit! is alwaysopposed to true
religion. [1]"hus 0ugustine argues that it is fitting for temporal things to e ordered ! Christian
rulers.[15]0nd these rulers ought not to e neutral in religious matters. Rather the! should promote
the true religion and e*en punish heretics. [12]Iustice consists in gi*ing each his own& thus nosociet! is Hust that does not gi*e 9od the worship due to #im $iv Dei >$>&61[13]7.
Since Christian rulers must see to it that societ! gi*es 9od #is due& it might seem that the! must of
themsel*es ha*e a certain authorit! in spiritual matters& that is& an episcopal authorit!. =ut this idea
was reHected ! the Church. $n @4@ /ope St 9elasius $ taught that the ro!al power and priestl!
authorit! are two distinct principles& oth instituted ! 9od& and that the suordination of temporal
to spiritual good implies that the temporal rulers must e suHect to the priestl! authorit! in matters
that concern eternal sal*ation.[14]
=ut Christian rulers oth in the =!8antine %mpire& and& after the translatio imperiiof 3GG& in the
#ol! Roman %mpire& did not alwa!s accept the 9elasian teaching. $n the ,est a conflict etween
pope and emperor de*eloped that came to a head in the #igh iddle 0ges in the $n*estitureContro*ers!. "he popes from St 9regor! V$$ to =oniface V$$$ de*eloped pre*ious teaching on the
relation of the two powers& and taught that the suordination of temporal under the spiritual ought to
e preser*ed ! a?uridical suordination of worldl! under priestl! authorit!. /riestl! authorit! is
seen not Hust as auctoritas&ut as a genuinepotestas& a coerci*e power. Rhonheimer argues that
calling the priestl! authorit!potestas is contrar! to the actual meaning of 9elasian diarch!&[6G]ut
one can also see it as a de*elopment of what was implicit in pre*ious teaching. $f one considers the
*er! high degree of magisterial authorit! with which theplenitudo potestas of the pope was taught
from St 9regor! V$$
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
15/24
potestas indirecta7. 9iles of Rome& who ga*e an important theoretical defense of the claims of
nam )anctam& argued that the pope
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
16/24
not destro!ed. Christ comes to heal and re-estalish nature. =ut not onl! to re-estalish it the wa! it
was efore the allB Christ ele*ates nature& granting a etter 'ind of eing a supernatural eing. 0nd
in fact nature was alwa!s intended as a sign and preparation for the supernatural. So& for e:ample&
marriage is a communion of persons that flows from nature and is good. =ut in the second coming
of Christ marriage is shown to ha*e een onl! a temporar! realit! a sign of the wedding of Christ
and #is ride the Church. %*er!thing that was good in marriage will e present in a more eminent
mode in the union of Christ and #is ride& ut natural marriage itself will e no more cf. t66?;G7. (ature is thus a shadow and image of the realit! that is to come through grace. "he natures
of things are not destro!ed ! grace& ut the! are so transformed that much that elonged to them
efore is replaced ! that of which it was the image. $n the present time though oth realities are
present at onceB the new realit! of grace is present as a seed along side the old realit! of nature.
"hus the ,edding of the Lam is present as a seed in the Church
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
17/24
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
18/24
[6]See? $tai 9radel&-mperor =orship and Roman Religion O:ford 6GG67 @-5.
[;]See (uma Denis ustel de Coulange
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
19/24
[6]De ecclesiastica potestate& $&2.
[65]See? Christopher Dawson& The :ormation of $hristendomSan rancisco 6GG3 [145]7 615-
662B The Dividing of $hristendomSan rancisco 6GG3 [145]7 ;G& ;3.
[62]Dawson& The Dividing@1-@;.
[63]Dawson& The Dividing ;-5.
[64]See? Dawson& The Dividing ;G& @6-@;.
[;G]See? Ste*en ,edgeworth and /eter %scalante& )Iohn Cal*in and the "wo Jingdoms&+ /art 6&
in? The $avinist Internationala! 6G167? http?cal*inistinternational.com6G16G64cal*in-6'-
6accessed (o*emer 4& 6G1@7.
[;1],edgeworth and %scalante& )Iohn Cal*in+ 6.
[;6]See? /eter %scalante& )"wo %nds or "wo Jingdoms+ in? The $alvinist International0pril
6G1;7? http?cal*inistinternational.com6G1;G@G3two-ends-or-two-'ingdomsaccessed
(o*emer 1G& 6G1@7.
[;;]See? %scalante& )"wo %nds.+[;@]See? Charles "a!lor& )ources of the )elfCamridge& assachusetts 14347 /art $$$? )"he
0ffirmation of Ordinar! Life.+
[;]See? Rhonheimer& $hristentum und s/+ularer )taat25-23.
[;5]See? %scalante& )"wo %nds.+
[;2]Charles "a!lor&A )ecular AgeCamridgeassachusetts 6GG27 chapter 6? )"he Rise of the
Disciplinar! Societ!.+
[;3]See? =rad 9regor!& The nintended Reformation% !ow a Religious Revolution )eculari1ed
)ocietyCamridgeassachusetts 6G167.
[;4]9regor!& The nintended Reformation15G-126.
[@G]/apst =enedi't >V$& )pe )alviRome 6GG27 12.
[@1]See? ichael =urleigh&-arthly 5owers% Religion and 5olitics in -urope from the
-nlightenment to the Great =arLondon 6GG7B )acred $auses% The $lash of Religion and
5olitics& from the Great =ar to the =ar on TerrorLondon 6GG57.
[@6]See? /in'& )Suare8 and =ellarmineB+ cf. /art $$ ao*e.
[@;]See? /art $$ ao*e.
[@@]See? /in'& )Conscience and Coercian.+
[@]/in'& )Conscience and Coercian.+
http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref25http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref26http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref27http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref28http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref29http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref30http://calvinistinternational.com/2012/05/29/calvin-2k-2/http://calvinistinternational.com/2012/05/29/calvin-2k-2/http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref31http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref32http://calvinistinternational.com/2013/04/08/two-ends-or-two-kingdoms/http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref33http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref34http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref35http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref36http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref37http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref38http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref39http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref40http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref41http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref42http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref43http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref44http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref45http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref25http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref26http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref27http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref28http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref29http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref30http://calvinistinternational.com/2012/05/29/calvin-2k-2/http://calvinistinternational.com/2012/05/29/calvin-2k-2/http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref31http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref32http://calvinistinternational.com/2013/04/08/two-ends-or-two-kingdoms/http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref33http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref34http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref35http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref36http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref37http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref38http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref39http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref40http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref41http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref42http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref43http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref44http://thejosias.com/2015/01/02/religious-liberty-and-tradition-iii/#_ftnref458/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
20/24
Religious Liberty and Tradition I&This is the last of four parts of an essay on the interpretation of Vatican IIs Declaration on
Religious Liberty& Dignitatis #umanW5art I considered inade*uate interpretationsC5art II
considered Thomas 5in+s interpretive brea+throughC5art IIIconsidered the history of the relation
of spiritual and temporal power A printable version of the whole essay can be foundhere
Part I&: The concerns of the conciliar
theologiansDignitatis !uman"egins with an optimistic reading one of the signs of the times? )0 sense of the
dignit! of the human person has een impressing itself more and more deepl! on the consciousness
of contemporar! man.+[1]0 footnote referring to /ope /ius >$$
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
21/24
this separation on a strict distinction of nature and graceF the state as a communit! rooted in
natural law has a different end from the Church& the ChurchV$
re-called the atmosphere at the time of the eginning of the Council with the following words?
"here was an incredile sense of e:pectation. [K] we 'new that the relationship
etween the Church and the modern period& right from the outset& had een slightl!
fraught& eginning with the Church
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
22/24
modern& de Luac complained of a )rising tide of immanentism&+ that was tr!ing to )dissol*e the
Church into the world&+[16]and against which de Luac wanted to preser*e the distinction etween
nature and grace. =efore and during the Council& howe*er& he saw the danger as coming primaril!
from the other directionF from those who made that distinction too sharp& separating nature and
grace too much.[1;]"his is the prolem that we saw in Iohn Courtne! urra!. ,hile de Luac
recogni8ed this prolem clearl!& recent wor' ! theologians such as Ste*en Long suggests that he
misidentified its roots. De Luac argued that the prolem la! in the idea of )pure nature+ ordered toa natural end intelligile in astraction from grace. =ut Long has con*incingl! argued that the real
prolem lies in a conception of nature that is not theonomic enough& a conception that ma'es nature
appear as a closed s!stem indifferent toward the di*ine. De Luac
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
23/24
"his solution enaled the post-conciliar Church to engage in an energetic defense of religious
liert! around the gloe without gi*ing up the continuit! of her teaching. =ut sinceDignitatis
!uman" did not e:plain its solution clearl! enough to a*oid the impression of discontinuit!& it
contriuted to a crisis of authorit! in post-conciliar theolog!.[6;]
otes
[1]Dignitatis !uman" 1.
[6]See? %dmund ,aldstein& )"he /apac! 0gainst the alse 9ospel of /rogress&+ )ancrucensis
log7& eruar! 66& 6G1;? http?sancrucensis.wordpress.com6G1;G666the-papac!-against-the-
false-gospel-of-progressaccessed Decemer 64& 6G1@7.
[;]See? 0lan imister&Robert )chuman% >eo )cholastic !umanism and the Reunification of
-urope=russels 6GG37.
[@]imister&Robert )chuman 1G5-1G3.
[]See? /in'& )IacEues aritainB+ imister&Robert )chuman11;-16.
[5]See? "homas ,. OV$&- per me un dono& 0ddress to /arish /riests and the Clerg! of Rome& 1@.
eruar 6G1;?
http?www.*atican.*ahol!fatherenedict:*ispeeches6G1;feruar!documentshfen-:*ispe6G1;G61@clero-romaen.htmlaccessed Decemer 64& 6G1@7.
[1G]Gaudium et )pes ;2& ;4.
[11]Cf. /ope =enedict >V$& 0ddress to Representati*es from the ,orld of Culture& Coll\ge des
=ernardins& /aris& Septemer 16& 6GG3?
http?www.*atican.*ahol!fatherenedict:*ispeeches6GG3septemerdocumentshfen-
:*ispe6GG3G416parigi-culturaen.htmlaccessed (o*emer 12& 6G1@7B cf. also idem& )pe )alvi
1;-1& note especiall! the references to de Luac& 1;-1@.
[16]#enri de Luac&Die -rbe Augustins& trans. #ans Mrs *on =althasar %insiedeln 14217& Vorwort
des Verfassers 8ur deutschen 0usgae 4-11.
[1;]De Luac& Die %re 0ugustins 2-3.
[1@]See? Ste*en 0. Long&>atura 5ura% (n the Recovery of >ature in the Doctrine of Grace(ew
Tor' 6G1G7. ,hile $ agree with Long
8/10/2019 Edmund Waldstein - Religious Liberty and Tradition
24/24
Recommended