View
214
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
1/30
A Voyage of eDiscoveryTom Knapp
General Counsel, Asia Pacific
18 April 2007
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
2/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 2
Setting the eDiscovery Scene
Why are large, well respected US corporations paying so muchin Court damages?
Failure to disclose or provide electronic documents in a timely fashion/or at all
Inadvertent destruction of documents after litigation hold should have applied
Spoliation of evidence due to failure to preserve emails and back up tapes
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
3/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 3
Setting the eDiscovery Scene
Management of electronically stored and transferredinformation is the hot topic for litigators
A complex, costly and administrative challenge for
corporations
Courts and lawmakers see the need to address theinterface between technology and litigation
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
4/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 4
Agenda
The Central Role of the IT Department !
What is Discovery?
What is eDiscovery and why it is different
Why it matters to you
Global trends in eDiscovery
Identifying some key issues and key take-aways
What you might like to do
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
5/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 5
Focus on Internal Systems of IT Depts
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
6/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 6
What is Discovery?
Parties to an impending civil court action seek toinvestigate and determine facts
Subject to application of privilege claims (eg. attorney-client privilege) during pre-trial phase, each party canrequest documents and other evidence from parties andnon-parties relevant to the lawsuit. Yes, even incriminating
evidence. Alternatively, a party can compel production of evidence bysubpoena (define the universe)
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
7/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 7
What is eDiscovery?
The discovery of information stored in electronic form.
Court-ordered or government investigations for thepurpose of obtaining critical evidence
Sometimes used to refer to electronic tools that expedite
the production of electronic documents
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
8/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 8
In a Nutshell
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
9/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 9
What is different about electronicallystored information?
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
10/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 10
What is different about electronicallystored information?
eDiscovery Modern corporations encourage decentralisation of information
ownership
Stored in multiple locations and on many formats .Weapons of
Mass Discovery
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
11/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 11
What is different about electronicallystored information?
Facts and Figures about electronic documents
Volume of electronic documents continues to increase:due to falling costs of storage data
archiving rather than document destruction
easy and cheap to copy, creating exact duplicates
easy to distribute lengthy documents globally
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
12/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 12
What is different about electronicallystored information?
Building Paper Towers
Paperwork (email and file server documentsonly) so far, from Australias biggest corporateinsolvency
2007 McGrath Nicol (www.mcgrathnicol.com)
.
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
13/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 13
Why Me?
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
14/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 14
Its About Information Management
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
15/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 15
Global Trends
Common law jurisdictions amending civil procedure rulesto specifically address electronic documents
England & Wales (October, 2005)
USA (December, 2006)
Victoria, Australia (February, 2007)
If not managed correctly, cost of locating electronicdocuments:
can exceed the damages sought by plaintiff or likely settlement costs
can act as a disincentive to defend claim
Impact on your corporation depends on state ofreadiness to react and comply
Courts will have no sympathy if your corporation strugglesto promptly find all relevant reasonably accessibleinformation.
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
16/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 16
Global Trends Common law vs. Civillaw jurisdictions
Civil law jurisdictions (most EU countries): No pre-trial disclosure
Common law jurisdictions (UK, USA, Canada, Australia): Pre-trialdisclosure / discovery is mandatory
Contrasting examples:
But discovery will apply to European companies or foreign operations where US or UKbased litigation!
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
17/30
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
18/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 18
Global Trends State of Victoria(Australia)
E-litigation Practice Note issued 7 February, 2007 provides guidanceon managing civil litigations where electronic documents involved.
Court expects lawyers to have:ascertained number/categories of discoverable documents;conferred with other parties about retention and production of electronic documents;
given notice of problems in providing discovery of any of these documents;
Court may order:a party to provide hardware and software to enable access to electronic documents
the parties to retain an IT consultant to assist compliance
Costs of managing e-litigation recoverable from the unsuccessfulparty
Message: Corporations need to proactively manage all of theirdocuments or risk:inability to properly defend proceedings
being subject to civil or criminal sanctions
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
19/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 19
Global Trends United States
The FRCP govern court procedures for civil suits infederal trial courts.
Significant amendments to FRCP effective December 1,2006 specifically to address electronic discovery
Concept of electronically stored information (ESI)introduced
Changes introduced in part to encourage parties to meet
early to understand scope and complexity of identifyingESI to:
Avoid discovery disputes
Minimise costs associated with eDiscovery (estimated 35-40% cost
savings over paper-based discovery)
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP)
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
20/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 20
Global Trends United States
Amended FRCP will require careful attention to detail
Parties now must prepare and identify ESI in their possession, custody orcontrol upon becoming aware of potential litigation, so early engagement with
your lawyers is essential Parties must meet promptly after a claim is filed and identify to the other party
such matters including:preservation arrangements and formats for production
all operating systems
office productivity software
disaster recovery procedures
major system-wide databases
document retention policies
how employees store ESI
Litigation hold policy
types of equipment that may hold ESI
potentially privileged information
Categories of ESI that may no longer be accessible
Likely costs and burdens of making ESI available
Parties must provide to each other a discovery plan that addressesall of the above
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
21/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 21
Global Trends United States
Exclusions / Exemptions to discovery:Data that is privileged
ESI that is not reasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost
Emphasis on the data source, not the data.
Egs:
Magnetic backup tapes
Unintelligible legacy data
Fragmented data after deletion
But ESI must still be preserved as the requesting party can still access such data byshowing good cause.
NB: Not knowing the contents of media does not make it not reasonably accessible.
Safe Harbor No court sanction for loss of ESI due to routine, good-faith retention programs
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
22/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 22
Global Trends United States
Impact of amended FRCP:
It is likely to affect the way corporations currently organize,maintain, alter, delete and archive ESI.
A corporations IT personnel will need to understand what changesmay be needed to IT systems that store information electronically.
IT personnel and the lawyers will need to work together!
Know where your ESI is before the lawsuit begins
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
23/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 23
ESI Traps for the unwary
And then the traps while seeking to comply: ESI:
Contains more information than paper documents
Data content more difficult to totally discard
Metadata, system records and deleted files are new sources ofdiscoverable information when compared to paper records
Metadata:ESI contain hidden information which is discoverable
Shows a documents format, how, when and by whom it was created, saved,
reviewed or modified (egs. Microsofts basic menu interface/track changesfunctions or emails which capture dates, times).
Documents may need to be accessed in native format to preserve discoverableinformation
Real example:
Client is billed for 4 hours work at partners hourly rate
Document metadata shows only 1 hours work at associates hourly rateOh dear !
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
24/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 24
ESI Traps for the unwary
Ghost data routine deletion of a computer file does not delete thatfile
File is renamed and removed from internal directory, enabling overwriting if needed
As memory and storage capacity increase, less likely that the file locations are ever entirelyoverwritten
Network records:Automatically generated records of their own activities
Identifies who had access to data, structure of files, when backups performed, etc
Have you met my computer forensic expert?!
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
25/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 25
Duty to preserve documents
Companies must stop deletion of relevant records when litigation isreasonably foreseeable
(egs. Demand letters/Subpoenas)
Must preserve potential evidence
Understand your IT systems now
In-house counsel must be able to: issue a litigation hold notice
ensure the suspension of data destruction
instruct employees to preserve and produce ESI when required
communicate with key employees identified as having relevant information
make sure all backups cans be identified
Foreign related companies (international operations) of a US multi-national must initiate corresponding processes so they can respond toinvestigations or litigation with minimum business interruption.
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
26/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 26
FRCP Are you ready?
So how ready are Corporations to respond to theamended FRCP?
More Statistics:
September 2006:35% of organisations (with at least 1000 employees) do not have an email management strategy
Over 50% of surveyed organisations confused email back-up with email archiving (ie. massive.pst back-up files without knowledge of the data retained)
(Association for Information and Image Management - www.aiim.org)
October 2006:Only 7% of responding Corporate Counsel felt their corporation could comply with all FRCP rules
(Association of Corporate Counsel, Annual Meeting, October 2006)
February 2007:Only 6% of corporation employees responsible for email policies felt fully prepared to comply withFRCP rules.
only 38% of respondents were familiar with the new amendments
45.9% of respondents had no retention policy for emails which is a critical requirement tocomply with amended FRCP
56% of respondents were still planning changes and unsure of whether they would comply(Fortiva survey, 2007)
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
27/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 27
The Risks of Non-Compliance
What constitutes failure to comply with eDiscovery rules? Spoliation of evidence
Wilful withholding, hiding or destruction of evidence relevant to a legal
proceedingUnreasonable or inconsistently enforced document retention policy
Failure to preserve information on backup tapes
Discovery violationsnegligence in production
delays in production
Incomplete or inaccurate disclosure
What are the penalties for failure to comply with eDiscoveryrules?
Ask the large, well respected US Corporations! Monetary penalties
Adverse influence jury instruction
Preclusion of own evidence (defendants employees not allowed totestify)
Entry of judgment against failing party
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
28/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 28
Strategies to consider to ensurecompliance with FRCP
A corporation can demonstrate its intentions to complywith eDiscovery rules by:
1. Making sure the entire corporation is committed
2. Having a robust records management program
3. Having mapped and described its IT systems at the enterprise andoperational levels
4. Assigning a senior attorney exclusively to eDiscovery and records
management processes and compliance and perhaps aneDiscovery Manager
5. Demonstrating processes that enable the prompt ability to locate,preserve and retrieve relevant data
6. Demonstrating it can conduct efficient and detailed searches
across the entire corporations IT systems7. Implementing a comprehensive data retention/deletion policy and
email archiving system that is tied to the records managementpolicy
8. Enabling the automatic deletion function for email to be disabled, if
necessary
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
29/30
2007 Computer Sciences Corporation 29
Strategies to consider to ensurecompliance with FRCP (cont)
9. The creation of a questionnaire (and completed by IT personnel) tomap and describe enterprise and operational business unit ITsystems that process and store electronic information that covers:
personal computer and server structure disaster recovery / business continuity
employee departure or transfer
Legal Hold Process
ESI Collection procedures
is expressed in a form suitable for presentation to (and can beunderstood by) outside counsel, opposing counsel and the Court)
10. and be kind to your lawyers!
This presentation does not constitute legal advice or any recommendation by CSC. Participants are encouraged to consult their own legal
advisers on the subject matter presented.
8/14/2019 Ediscovery to IT
30/30
Experience. Results.
Thank you.
Recommended