View
5.159
Download
3
Category
Tags:
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
Designated substances and hazardous materials survey report by Cole Engineering completed on the structures present at the Greenwich-Mohawk brownfield site in Brantford, Ont.The site was home to Massey-Harris, Verity Plow and Cockshutt Plow factories until the late 20th century.
Citation preview
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF BRANTFORD
Designated Substances & Hazardous Materials Survey
at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteExisting Vacant Buildings
N O V E M B E R 3 0 , 2 0 1 1
D R A F T R E P O R T
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.70 Valleywood Drive, Markham, ON, L3R 4T5
T 905.940.6161 F 905.940.2064 www.coleengineering.ca
November 30, 2011 Our Ref: E11‐543 Mr. Matt Reniers Director, Policy Planning Community Development Commission The Corporation of the City of Brantford Purchasing Division – Finance Department 1 Market Square, Lower Level, Suite 120 Brantford, ON N3T 6C8 Dear Mr. Reniers:
Re: DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site 347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Street, Brantford, Ontario
We are pleased to submit four (4) hard copies (1 original and 3 copies), and one (1) electronic copy of the Draft Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey (DSHMS) Report for the vacant buildings located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site. The report documents relevant background information, the methodology, findings and recommendations of the DSHMS conducted by Cole Engineering Group Ltd. personnel between October 21 and November 17, 2011.
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.
Yours truly, COLE ENGINEERING GROUP LTD. John Chadwick, P.Geo. Tabitha Lee, M.A.Sc., P.Eng. Project Manager Environmental Engineer /rb
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
ES-1
Executive Summary
Cole Engineering Group Ltd. (CEG) was retained by The Corporation of the City of Brantford (The City) to conduct a Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey (DSHMS) of the vacant buildings on the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site located at 347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Street, Brantford, Ontario (subject location).
The field work for the survey was carried out by CEG survey personnel between October 21 and November 17, 2011.
The objectives of this survey were as follows:
To comply with the requirements of Section 30 of the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act;
To identify designated substances and/or hazardous materials within surveyed areas of the subject location;
To document, by preparation of this report, the type, location, condition, and quantity of designated substances and hazardous materials identified during the survey; and
To provide applicable management considerations to The Corporation of the City of Brantford for each designated substance and hazardous material identified.
Designated substances and hazardous materials were identified during the course of CEG’s survey. Survey limitations resulted from the various states of disrepair, and health and safety challenges, present within buildings at the subject location.
The findings of this survey are summarized below.
Designated Substance/ Hazardous Material
Survey Findings
Asbestos
A total of four hundred and twenty‐six (426) bulk material samples were taken of suspected asbestos‐containing materials throughout all buildings at the subject location. One hundred and three (103) of these samples were confirmed to contain varying percentages of asbestos content (ranging from 0.5% to 45% Chrysotile and 4% to 30% Amosite). These materials included:
Mechanical Systems Insulation: Asbestos‐containing mechanical systems insulation, in the forms of air‐cell, mag‐block, parging cement and other white and beige insulation materials were identified on pipe straights and fittings as well as boiler component and tank insulation throughout the subject location.
Drywall Joint Compound and Filler Material: Asbestos‐containing drywall joint compound was identified on walls within Building 1B, Building 5B and Building 6B‐2 (Administration Building) at the subject location.
Asbestos Cement Products: Asbestos‐containing cement boards and cement siding were identified on interior and exterior walls throughout the subject location.
Caulking: Asbestos‐containing caulking, used as a sealant was identified on the windows of Building 3A, Building 4 (Garage), Building 3B‐2, Building 5B, Building 6B‐1 and
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
ES-2
Designated Substance/ Hazardous Material
Survey Findings
between the gaps of the exterior brick finish of Building 9 at the subject location.
Roofing Materials: Asbestos‐containing roofing materials were identified from Building 3C (Covered Corridor) and Building 9 at the subject location.
Vinyl Floor Tiles: Asbestos‐containing Vinyl Floor Tiles (VFTs) were identified on the floor of the 1st floor southwest vestibule and the shower/locker room of Building 6A‐1, the 2nd floor of Building 6A‐2, the floors throughout Building 6B‐2 (Administration Building), and the floor of the west section of the Time Keepers Building at the subject location.
Black Mastic: Asbestos‐containing black mastic, used as an adhesive for VFTs, was identified on the floor of the southwest vestibule and the shower/locker room of Building 6A‐1, the 2nd floor of Building 6A‐2, the floors throughout Building 6B‐2 (Administration Building) and the floor of the west section of the Time Keepers Building at the subject location.
Light Fixture Heat Shield Asbestos‐containing light fixture heat shields (2) were identified on the 2nd floor of Building 6B‐2 (Administration Building).
Rigid Black Liner: An asbestos‐containing rigid black lining material was identified within the 4th floor washroom of Building 1B at the subject location.
The majority of ACMs identified throughout the subject location ranged in condition from fair to poor. There is the potential that unidentified materials exist on‐site. In addition, various observed, but inaccessible materials have been assumed to contain asbestos until such time that their contents can be verified by sampling and analysis.
Lead
Spot test readings, using X‐Ray Fluorescence, were carried out at two‐hundred and twenty‐one (221) locations throughout the subject location. A total of one‐hundred and eighty‐six (186) of the painted surfaces tested where found to contain varying concentrations of lead ranging from 0.01 mg/cm2 to 18.0 mg/cm2.
Lead is also assumed to be present in the solder joints of copper piping observed throughout the surveyed areas.
Mercury Liquid mercury was observed in thermostats throughout the subject location.
Mercury is also assumed to be present as a vapour in fluorescent light bulbs and electrical switches observed throughout the subject location.
Silica Building components, assumed to contain silica, such as concrete foundations, floors, walls, columns and mortar were observed throughout the subject location.
PCBs
Light Ballasts:
Fluorescent light fixture ballasts were observed throughout the subject location. A number of the ballasts inspected were suspected to contain PCBs. Others were labelled as non‐PCB containing.
A number of light ballasts and fluorescent light fixtures could not be accessed as part of this survey due to excessive water damage and rusting.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
ES-3
Designated Substance/ Hazardous Material
Survey Findings
Other PCB‐containing equipment:
Beyond the scope of this assignment, a PCB Inventory completed by others, in September 2011, documented PCB‐containing equipment identified on‐site, which included transformers, capacitors, liquids and other electrical equipment. The inventory identified 54 transformers with a PCB concentration of less than 50 ppm, 13 transformers with a PCB concentration of between 50 and 500 ppm, and three transformers with a PCB concentration of greater than 500 ppm. Additionally, other empty transformers, capacitors, stockpiled PCB‐containing light ballasts, and buckets and drums of unidentified oils were identified.
Mould
Abundant evidence of mould growth was observed on gypsum, wood, paper‐based products and other organic surfaces throughout all buildings at the subject location. An excessive amount of water infiltration into the interior of the structures has created ideal growing conditions for mould and its presence is prolific, where said substrates exist.
Without the removal of water infiltration into the buildings, mould growth will continue to occur throughout the subject location.
Other Hazardous Materials
Several areas were identified throughout the subject location where containers with unknown contents, as well as compressed gas cylinders, were observed. None of the contents present within the containers or cylinders could be conclusively identified during the survey.
ODSs
A total of two (2) refrigerator units and one (1) window mounted air‐conditioning unit were observed during the investigation. The refrigerants present in the refrigerator within the Time Keepers Building and the air‐conditioner within Building 6B‐1 contain ODSs (R12 and R22, respectively). The refrigerator present in the west apartment on the 2nd floor of Building 2 no longer had a label indicating the type of refrigerant present. The refrigerant present within this unit shall be assumed to contain ODSs until proven otherwise.
Designated substances (and hazardous materials) require removal, to the extent practicable, prior to their disturbance during any selective demolition and/or shoring/stabilization techniques employed for the purpose of working toward an adaptive reuse of buildings with heritage value (discussed within the accompanying Heritage Impact Statement by Taylor Hazell Architects and the Structural Conditions Analysis by Picco Engineering) or complete demolition (or other reworking) of other on‐site buildings (i.e. not included in the Structural Condition/Heritage Impact Assessment).
Reading the executive summary should not be used as a substitute for reading the complete assessment report. This executive summary offers a brief overview of the survey observations and findings.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
i
Table of Contents
Transmittal Letter Executive Summary Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Scope of Work.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Site Description ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Regulatory Context .................................................................................................................. 2
1.4.1 Asbestos ...................................................................................................................................2 1.4.2 Lead ..........................................................................................................................................3 1.4.3 Management of Waste.............................................................................................................3
1.5 Survey Limitations.................................................................................................................... 3 1.5.1 347 Greenwich Street...............................................................................................................4 1.5.2 66 Mohawk Street ....................................................................................................................5 1.5.3 General .....................................................................................................................................5
2.0 Methodology ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Information Review.................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 General Survey Methodology .................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Asbestos‐Containing Materials Survey Methodology.............................................................. 6 2.4 Lead in Paint Survey Methodology .......................................................................................... 7 2.5 Other Designated Substances Survey Methodology ............................................................... 7 2.6 PCB‐Containing Equipment Survey Methodology ................................................................... 7 2.7 Mould Survey Methodology .................................................................................................... 7 2.8 Ozone Depleting Substances Survey Methodology ................................................................. 7 2.9 Other Hazardous Materials Survey Methodology ................................................................... 8
3.0 Observations and Results ........................................................................................................... 8 3.1 General..................................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Information Review.................................................................................................................. 9 3.3 Asbestos‐Containing Materials Survey Results........................................................................ 9
3.3.1 Mechanical Systems Insulation ................................................................................................9 3.3.2 Sprayed Fireproofing ..............................................................................................................11 3.3.3 Applied Texturized Material ...................................................................................................11 3.3.4 Asbestos‐Cement Products ....................................................................................................11 3.3.5 Ceiling Tiles.............................................................................................................................12 3.3.6 Drywall Joint Compound ........................................................................................................12 3.3.7 Plaster.....................................................................................................................................13 3.3.8 Vinyl Floor Tiles ......................................................................................................................13 3.3.9 Vinyl Sheet Flooring................................................................................................................14 3.3.10 Mastics ...................................................................................................................................14 3.3.11 Sealants ..................................................................................................................................15 3.3.12 Roofing Materials ...................................................................................................................18 3.3.13 Other Asbestos‐Containing Materials ....................................................................................19
3.4 Lead Survey Results................................................................................................................ 22
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
ii
3.4.1 347 Greenwich Street.............................................................................................................22 3.4.2 66 Mohawk Street ..................................................................................................................25 3.4.3 Other Lead Containing Materials ...........................................................................................25
3.5 Mercury Survey Results ......................................................................................................... 25 3.6 Silica Survey Results ............................................................................................................... 26 3.7 Other Designated Substances Survey Results........................................................................ 26
3.7.1 Acrylonitrile ............................................................................................................................26 3.7.2 Arsenic ....................................................................................................................................26 3.7.3 Benzene ..................................................................................................................................26 3.7.4 Coke Oven Emissions..............................................................................................................26 3.7.5 Ethylene Oxide .......................................................................................................................26 3.7.6 Isocyanates.............................................................................................................................26 3.7.7 Vinyl Chloride .........................................................................................................................26
3.8 Hazardous Materials Survey Results ...................................................................................... 26 3.8.1 PCBs........................................................................................................................................26 3.8.2 Stored Materials .....................................................................................................................27 3.8.3 Mould .....................................................................................................................................27 3.8.4 Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS)........................................................................................27 3.8.5 Radon Gas...............................................................................................................................28 3.8.6 Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation (UFFI)...........................................................................28
4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ......................................................................................... 28 4.1 General................................................................................................................................... 28 4.2 Asbestos‐Containing Materials .............................................................................................. 28 4.3 Lead........................................................................................................................................ 30 4.4 Mercury.................................................................................................................................. 30 4.5 Silica ....................................................................................................................................... 31 4.6 Other Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials....................................................... 31
5.0 Closure..................................................................................................................................... 31
List of Tables Table A Bulk Material Sampling Requirements……..…………………………………………………………………….6
Appendices Appendix A Drawings Appendix B Sampling and Testing Results Table 1 – Bulk Samples for Asbestos Table 2 – XRF Spot Test Locations Table 3 – Light Ballast Inspections for PCBs Table 4 – Stored Hazardous Materials Table 5 – ODSs Appendix C Room by Room ACM Inventory ‐ Table 6 Appendix D Background and Past Uses of Designated Substances Appendix E Laboratory Analysis Reports Appendix F Site Photographs
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
1
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background Cole Engineering Group Ltd. (CEG) was retained by The Corporation of the City of Brantford to conduct a Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey (DSHMS) of the vacant buildings located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site located at 347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Street in the City of Brantford, Ontario (subject location).
Figure 1‐1 in Appendix A provides an aerial view of the subject location with buildings identified on‐site.
The objectives of this DSHMS were:
To comply with the requirements of Section 30 of the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act;
To identify designated substances and/or hazardous materials within surveyed areas of the subject location;
To document, by preparation of this report, the type, location, condition, and quantity of designated substances and hazardous materials identified during the survey; and
To provide applicable management considerations to The Corporation of the City of Brantford for each designated substance and hazardous material identified.
This report summarizes the scope of work, methodology, findings and recommendations of the DSHMS conducted by CEG personnel between October 21 and November 17, 2011.
1.2 Scope of Work The scope of this survey included all of the building structures located at the subject location with the exception of the Canadian Military Heritage Museum. These buildings included:
347 Greenwich Street
Building 1A Building 1B Building 2 Building 3B‐1 (Forge A) Building 3B‐2 (Receiving) Building 3B‐3 Building 3B‐4
Building 3B‐5 Building 3B‐6 Building 4 (Garage) Building 5A Building 5B Building 5A‐1 Building 6A
Building 6A‐1 Building 6B Building 6B‐1 (Administration) Building 8 Building 9 Building 10 Building 11
66 Mohawk Street
Time Keepers Building (Building 1) Cockshutt Building (Building 2)
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
2
The DSHMS consisted of the following:
A review of existing background information, as available;
A room by room survey of the accessible areas within buildings at the subject location;
Sampling and testing of suspect materials (e.g. suspected asbestos‐containing and lead‐containing materials);
Submission of samples to an accredited laboratory for analysis;
Interpretation of analytical data and identification of designated substances and hazardous materials; and
A review of site‐specific management considerations and recommendations.
1.3 Site Description The subject location is a former Massey Ferguson production facility on the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site and covers approximately 50 acres in southeast Brantford, Ontario. Industrial and manufacturing activities have taken place at the subject location since the end of the 19th Century. Specific historical and heritage details regarding the site are provided in the accompanying Heritage Impact Assessment completed by Taylor Hazell Architects (November 2011).
The subject location is a complex site containing a number of industrial heritage buildings, which exist in varying states of disrepair. The site has stood vacant for many years and the buildings have been subjected to significant deterioration by way of exposure to the elements. The subject location comprises buildings existing at two distinct municipal addresses; namely, 347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Street.
The structures at the subject location range in construction style from turn of the century brick and wood buildings to mid‐20th Century steel and concrete construction. The majority of the smaller outbuildings at the subject location are cinder block construction. The exact age of the majority of the buildings on‐site is unknown.
1.4 Regulatory Context The Occupational Health and Safety Act (the Act), Section 30 (1), stipulates that before beginning a project, the owner shall determine whether any designated substances are present at the project site and shall prepare a list of all designated substances that are present at the site (i.e. a designated substances survey). In accordance with the Act, the locations of designated substances must be identified to all prospective constructors, contractors and sub‐contractors (subsections (3) and (4)) and must be included as part of the tendering information (subsection (2)).
Designated Substances refer to the eleven chemical or physical agents specified in the Act that are regulated by Ontario Regulation 490/09 (Designated Substances). This regulation sets out employer duties, applicable assessment and control programs, medical examinations and clinical tests and exposure limits.
1.4.1 Asbestos Asbestos is the one designated substance specifically governed by two regulations under the Act – O. Reg. 490/09 (per above) and Ontario Regulation 278/05, entitled “Designated Substance – Asbestos on Construction Projects and in Buildings and Repair Operations”. This comprehensive regulation
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
3
includes, but is not limited to governance of ongoing asbestos management in buildings, information for workers, owner and employer responsibilities, Types of abatement operations and their measures and procedures, applicable respirator usages, instruction and training requirements, asbestos work reports and workers register, provision of equivalent measures, Notice to inspector requirements, and bulk and air sampling requirements.
1.4.2 Lead In 1976, the Federal Government implemented the Federal Hazardous Products Act and Regulations, which limited the concentration of lead in interior paint to 0.5% (5,000 ppm). The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) also set a lead concentration limit of 0.5% by weight for paint used in the interior of residential dwellings.
In October 21, 2010, the federal Hazardous Products Act Surface Coating Materials Regulation (SOR/2010‐224) limited the allowable concentration of total lead present in a surface coating material to 90 mg/kg (90 ppm). Using this criterion, those new surface coating materials with lead concentrations that exceed 90 ppm are considered to be lead‐based. This regulation however does not apply to existing painted surfaces within buildings. Paints with any verifiable concentration of lead, can be considered to be “lead‐containing”, with relative concentrations indicating the amount of lead content.
1.4.3 Management of Waste The disposal of designated substances is regulated under the Ontario Environmental Protection Act (EPA), specifically O. Reg. 347, General – Waste Management (most recently amended by O. Reg. 234/11). The regulation details the minimum requirements for the appropriate transport and disposal of wastes, including acceptable Leachate Quality Criteria.
In addition to the EPA waste management requirements, the Canada Wide Standards on Fluorescent Lamps Containing Mercury requires that quantities of fluorescent light tubes destined for waste in excess of 25 tubes are to be considered hazardous waste and must be disposed of in a manner compliant with O. Reg. 347.
1.5 Survey Limitations A number of limitations were encountered during the completion of the DSHMS by CEG. Due to the advanced state of deterioration of building finishes throughout the subject location several areas throughout the facility could not be accessed due to serious health and safety concerns.
In advance of survey activities undertaken at the subject location a “Pre‐Inspection Safety Assessment” was completed for all buildings by Picco Engineering. This safety assessment identified a number of areas throughout the subject location that were deemed no longer safe to enter due to the potential for imminent roof or structural collapse resulting form weathering building finishes.
Picco’s Pre‐Inspection Safety Assessment can be found in the Appendix of their Structural Condition Assessment enclosed with this report.
Below is a description of the areas within the subject location that could not be accessed as part of the survey. Figure 1.2 in Appendix A illustrates these inaccessible areas.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
4
1.5.1 347 Greenwich Street The following areas could not be accessed as part of the survey due to health and safety concerns associated with the deterioration of structural components;
Building 2 • The entire 3rd floor could not be assessed due lack of safe method for entry and deteriorated
structural components;
• Large portions of the north and northeast sections of the 2nd floor could not be accessed due to the deterioration of the floors and the risk their structural failure;
• The entire western section of the building could not be accessed as a result of a roof collapse.
• The entire eastern section of the building could not be accessed as a result of fire damage and a complete collapse of entire sections of the structure.
Building 3A • Both the 2nd and 3rd floor were not accessed due to the risk of floor collapse. Several areas were
observed where beams had collapsed or where the floor had failed; and
• The entire eastern section of the building could not be accessed due to severe roof collapse and the risk of further deterioration.
Building 3B-3 • The entire 2nd floor was not accessed due to severely deteriorated floors and structural
members; and
• The entire west end of the building could not be accessed to due a complete structural failure and collapse.
Building 3B-6 Building 3B‐6 could not be accessed due to the imminent collapse of the roof. During the survey the roof was observed to be bowing with collapse already occurring in some places. Building 3B‐5, directly to the west of this building, had already collapsed.
Buildings 6A-1 and 6A-2 A number of areas present in the main manufacturing areas of these buildings could not be safely accessed as part of the survey. Within these buildings a number of water filled pools of unknown depths were observed as well as large water filled cavities below concrete floors. The areas where the large cavities below the floors were observed could not be accessed due to the risk of water related deterioration to structural members below the concrete and the risk of floor collapse upon entering these areas.
With the exception of the 2nd floor locker/shower area and the 2nd and 3rd floor storage corridors, all areas above the ground floor could not be accessed. This includes all catwalks within the buildings. The support structure and welds for the catwalks appeared to be in an advanced state of deterioration and as such, were not entered.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
5
1.5.2 66 Mohawk Street The following areas present within the Cockshutt Building could not be accessed as part of the survey due to health and safety concerns associated with the deterioration of structural components:
The Cockshutt Building • The entire northern section could not be accessed due to the collapse of the entire central
section of the interior of the building;
• The 2nd and 3rd floor of the southern office section could not be accessed due to the severe deterioration of the floors and the potential for structural failure; and
• The basement could not be accessed due to the risk of structural failure.
1.5.3 General In addition to the above, no roofs were able to be accessed of any building due to a formal warning from the structural team and the obvious state of disrepair that has occurred on‐site.
As a result of the inaccessibility of the above‐mentioned areas, the type, condition and quantities of any associated designated substances and hazardous materials are unknown, but are assumed to exist in the same relative proportion to the accessible areas surveyed.
Furthermore, due to the absence of electrical power in any of the buildings at the subject location, interior lighting was not available during the survey. Although portable lighting was used, the ability to obtain detailed views of certain building components was affected.
2.0 Methodology
2.1 Information Review The following record relating to designated substances and hazardous was reviewed prior to completing the DSHMS:
• PCB Inventory, Greenwich Brownfield Site, 347 Greenwich Street, Brantford, ON completed by GENIVAR, September 2011 (Project Number 111‐19798‐00)
In addition, a telephone conference was held on November 14, 2011 between the project team and Mr. Ed Long, former Facility Planning Engineer at Massy Ferguson.
2.2 General Survey Methodology The methodology of the survey was aimed at identifying designated substances as defined under the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act, which include: asbestos, lead, mercury, silica, benzene, acrylonitrile, arsenic, coke oven emissions, ethylene oxide, isocyanates, and vinyl chloride. In addition, other hazardous materials, such as PCBs, microbiological contamination (mould), ozone‐depleting substances (ODSs), and other stored chemicals and wastes were included in the survey scope, as applicable. Background information on designated substances and hazardous materials is presented in Appendix D.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
6
The surveyors performed a room by room survey of the subject location to identify observable designated substances and hazardous materials and document their type, location, conditions and estimated quantities.
Bulk sampling of materials suspected of containing asbestos and spot test readings, using X‐Ray Fluorescence, for the concentration of lead in painted surfaces were performed.
The following sections outline additional survey methodologies employed for specific substances.
2.3 Asbestos-Containing Materials Survey Methodology The methodology employed for asbestos‐containing materials (ACMs) was focused on identifying the presence of friable and non‐friable ACMs by collection and analysis of suspect bulk materials samples. The collection of bulk material samples was performed according to the procedures documented in the Ontario Ministry of Labour’s (MOL) publication Designated Substances in the Workplace: A Guide to the Asbestos Regulation for Construction Projects, Buildings and Repair Operations.
O. Reg. 278/05 stipulates the minimum number of samples that must have asbestos concentrations less than 0.5% in order for an area of homogenous material to be considered non asbestos‐containing. Table 1 below summarizes the bulk material sampling requirements.
Table A: Bulk Material Sampling Requirements
Type of Material Size of Homogenous
Material Minimum Number of
Bulk Samples
Less than 90 m2 3
90 m2 or more, but less than 450m2
5
Surfacing material, including without limitation material that is applied to surfaces by spraying, by trowelling or otherwise, such as acoustical plaster on ceilings, fireproofing materials on structural members and plaster 450m2 or larger 7
Thermal insulation, except as described below Any size 3
Thermal insulation patch Less than 2m or 0.5m2 1
Other material Any size 3
The following sample collection procedures were followed:
A small volume of suspect material was collected from either a damaged piece of material or cut with the aid of a clean sampling knife from the parent material using amended water to prevent fibre release;
Each sample was placed in a clear, polyethylene bag and was sealed and labelled accordingly. Individual sample bags were then placed within a larger polyethylene bag containing other set samples and sealed and labelled.
A chain of custody form was completed for all samples collected and was submitted with samples to EMSL Analytical Inc, New Jersey, U.S.A. All samples were initially analyzed using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) following U.S. EPA Test Method EPA/600/R‐93/116 protocols with a 400 point count method employed for materials with initial results of <1%.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
7
A total of four‐hundred and twenty‐six (426) samples were collected as part of this survey. The number of homogenous samples collected from each suspect building material was done so in accordance with Table 1 of O. Reg. 278/05.
2.4 Lead in Paint Survey Methodology Testing for lead in paint was conducted using an X‐ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrum Analyser. The analyzer uses low‐level radioactivity to detect the concentration of lead in painted surfaces. The analyzer provides real time readings of the concentrations of lead in painted surfaces and is able to detect lead on surfaces that have been painted numerous times. The unit performs a self calibration each time it is activated in addition to the calibrations performed by the inspector prior to taking readings of painted surfaces (from equipment paint standards).
To perform the spot tests on painted surfaces the CEG surveyor positioned the XRF analyzer against a painted surface, where the device is activated and the low‐level radiation is absorbed by the painted surface, which then emits energy back to the device as fluorescence. The emissions from the lead within the paint are then converted by the analyzer into an electrical signal and the concentration of lead in the surface is presented on the analyzer’s display screen.
2.5 Other Designated Substances Survey Methodology The methodology for the identification of other Designated Substances followed the same room by room visual inspection methodology as the investigations for asbestos and lead in painted surfaces. During the survey other identified Designated Substances were recorded and their quantities and locations noted, as applicable.
2.6 PCB-Containing Equipment Survey Methodology As a separate, in‐depth PCB Inventory was completed in September 2011 by others, CEG’s methodology focused on the visual inspection of accessible ballasts contained within the fluorescent lighting fixtures located throughout the subject location. Where possible, the manufacture name and catalogue number were recorded. Where not clearly labelled as “Non PCB”, the information presented on the ballast labels was compared with the Environment Canada document entitled “Identification of Lamp Ballasts Containing PCBs (Revised August 1991)” and assumed to contain PCBs, as applicable.
It should be noted that a majority of the ballasts present at the subject location could not be inspected as most labels were extremely water damaged or worn off or the ballasts were inaccessible due to rusting and otherwise deteriorated light fixtures.
2.7 Mould Survey Methodology The inspection for mould at the subject location was performed through visual observations of materials known to facility the growth of moulds. The suspected presence of mould growth on materials was recorded as part of the room by room survey process.
Bulk or tape lift samples for mould were not collected as part of the survey and the presence of the material was assessed strictly on visual observation.
2.8 Ozone Depleting Substances Survey Methodology The investigation of Ozone Depleting Substances (ODSs) at the subject location was performed first
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
8
through the identification of equipment requiring refrigerants as part of the room by room survey process followed by an inspection for labels on the equipment (indicating the type of refrigerant present). The refrigerant‐type was then referenced against refrigerants known to be ODSs.
2.9 Other Hazardous Materials Survey Methodology The identification of other potentially hazardous materials at the subject location was undertaken as part of the room by room survey process. The presence of stored chemicals, drums, compressed gas cylinders, batteries and other observed materials were recorded and their locations and approximate quantities documented. Samples of these materials were not collected for analysis, but instead were assumed to be potentially hazardous.
3.0 Observations and Results
3.1 General Designated substances and hazardous materials were identified at the subject location. The sections below provide substance‐specific discussions summarizing the survey findings. Figures 2‐1 to 2‐29 in Appendix A illustrate the sample and test locations taken throughout the subject location during the survey. Figures 3‐1 to 3‐31 in Appendix A illustrate the locations of asbestos‐containing materials throughout the subject location.
Appendix B contains all samples, testing and inventory results from the survey, while Appendix C specifically details the type, location, conditions and estimated quantities of each confirmed asbestos‐containing material throughout the subject location.
Laboratory Analysis Reports are included in Appendix E and Site Photographs are included in Appendix F. Site photographs are presented in a comprehensive log in the following general order:
• Overview of buildings;
• Mechanical Systems Insulation;
• Other Asbestos‐Containing Materials; namely asbestos cement boarding, caulking materials, Vinyl floor tiles and sheeting, fallen roofing materials and felts;
• Painted surfaces;
• Mercury‐containing equipment;
• Light Ballasts;
• Potential ODS‐containing equipment;
• Stored chemicals and products;
• Mould impacted materials; and
• Health and Safety concerns on‐site
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
9
3.2 Information Review The information gathered as part of the review yielded the following findings as it relates to potential designated substances and hazardous materials on‐site:
• The PCB Inventory report completed by GENIVAR in September 2011 documented PCB‐containing equipment identified on site, which included transformers, capacitors, liquids and other electrical equipment. The inventory identified 54 transformers with a PCB concentration of less than 50 ppm, 13 transformers with a PCB concentration of between 50 and 500 ppm, and three transformers with a PCB concentration of greater than 500 ppm. Additionally, other empty transformers, capacitors, stockpiled PCB‐containing light ballasts, and buckets and drums of unidentified oils were identified.
• The telephone conference call held with Mr. Ed Long, former Facility Planning Engineer at Massy Ferguson (from 1964 until the property went into receivership), yielded a perspective of the subject location from its days of operation. Mr. Long identified that asbestos‐containing materials were known or expected to exist on the site (e.g. vinyl floor tile and pipe insulation) as well as the expectation that most of the painted surfaces comprised lead‐based paints throughout the buildings. In addition, he noted that the extensive use of chemicals in the forging process (mainly in the building named 5A‐2 in CEG’s report), which included heavy salts and industrial trichloroethylene, had likely embedded or “impregnated” the building ceiling materials/beams.
3.3 Asbestos-Containing Materials Survey Results A total of four‐hundred and twenty‐six (426) samples were collected as part of this survey. Of these, one‐hundred and three (103) were found to contain asbestos. Figures 2‐1 to 2‐29 in Appendix A illustrate the bulk material sample locations taken throughout the subject location during the survey. Figures 3‐1 to 3‐31 in Appendix A illustrate the locations of asbestos‐containing materials throughout the subject location.
The sample results from the survey are shown in Table 1 presented in Appendix B. Appendix C (Table 6) shows the type, location, conditions and estimated quantities of each confirmed asbestos‐containing material throughout the subject location. It is noted that the asbestos‐containing materials observed on‐site were in varying states of disrepair, collectively evaluated as fair to poor.
The asbestos‐containing materials have been itemized as follows:
3.3.1 Mechanical Systems Insulation
Pipe Systems Mechanical Systems Insulation (MSI) in the form of air‐cell, mag‐block and other white insulation materials were observed on pipe straights throughout the subject location. MSI in the form of parging cement on pipe fittings was observed throughout the subject location.
A total of seven (7) sample sets, consisting of twenty‐one (21) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐4A‐C, E11‐534‐5A‐C, E11‐534‐16A‐C, E11‐534‐17A‐C, E11‐534‐20A‐C, E11‐524‐22A‐C and E11‐534‐75A‐C) of MSI observed at the subject location were collected as part of the survey.
CEG sample E11‐534‐4A, of air‐cell MSI collected from a pipe straight on the 2nd floor of Building 1B, was found to contain 12% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐4B, of air‐cell MSI collected from a pipe
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
10
straight on the 2nd floor of Building 1B, was found to contain 12% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐4C, of air‐cell MSI collected from a pipe straight on the 2nd floor of Building 1B, was found to contain 18% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐5A, of parging cement MSI collected from a pipe fitting in Building 6B‐1, was found to contain 30% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐5B, of parging cement MSI collected from a pipe fitting in Building 6B‐1 was found to contain 30% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐5C, of parging cement MSI collected from a pipe fitting in Building 6B‐1 was found to contain 25% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐16A, of white pipe wrap MSI collected from a pipe straight on the 1st floor of Building 3A, was found to contain 30% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐16B, of white pipe wrap MSI collected from a pipe straight on the 1st floor of Building 3A, was found to contain 30% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐16C, of white pipe wrap MSI collected from a pipe straight on the 1st floor of Building 3A, was found to contain 40% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐17A, of mag‐block MSI collected from a pipe straight in the washroom at the far east end of Building 3C (Covered Corridor), was found to contain 30% Amosite asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐17B, of mag‐block MSI collected from a pipe straight in the washroom at the far east end of Building 3C (Covered Corridor), was found to contain 30% Amosite asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐17C, of mag‐block MSI collected from a pipe straight in the washroom at the far east end of Building 3C (Covered Corridor), was found to contain 20% Amosite asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐22A, of air‐cell MSI collected from a pipe straight in Building 3B‐1, was found to contain 30% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐22B, of air‐cell MSI collected from a pipe straight in Building 3B‐1, was found to contain 30% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐22C, of air‐cell MSI collected from a pipe straight in Building 3B‐1, was found to contain 35% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐75A, of white MSI collected from an outbuilding adjacent to the south wall of Building 6A‐2, was found to contain 15% Chrysotile asbestos. The remaining two (2) samples in the set were not analyzed per a stop positive approach.
Asbestos was not detected in the remaining three (3) samples collected, CEG sample E11‐534‐20A‐C, of anti‐sweat MSI.
Other Mechanical Systems Mechanical systems insulation, in the form of parging cement and white and beige MSI’s were observed on tanks and the boiler housing in the Boiler Room of Building 3B‐3 at the subject location.
A total of three (3) sample sets, consisting of nine (9) samples (CEG Samples E11‐534‐80A‐C, E11‐534‐82A‐C and E11‐534‐83A‐C), of MSI on tanks and the boiler housing were collected as part of the survey.
CEG sample E11‐534‐80A, of parging cement MSI collected from a tank on the boiler housing, was found to contain 40% Chrysotile asbestos. The remaining two (2) samples in the set were not analyzed per a stop positive approach.
CEG sample E11‐534‐82A, of beige insulation collected from within a boiler housing hatch door, was found to contain 4% Amosite asbestos. The remaining two (2) samples in the set were not analyzed per a stop positive approach.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
11
CEG sample E11‐534‐83A, of white MSI collected from a tank adjacent to the Boiler Room, was found to contain 45% Chrysotile asbestos. The remaining two (2) samples in the set were not analyzed per a stop positive approach.
3.3.2 Sprayed Fireproofing Sprayed fireproofing was not observed at the subject location.
3.3.3 Applied Texturized Material Applied texturized material was observed on the walls of the southeast bay of Building 6B‐1 and the walls and ceilings of the Time Keepers Building.
A total of two (2) sample sets, consisting of eight (8) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐53A‐C and E11‐534‐96A‐E) of applied texturized material observed at the subject location, were collected as part of the survey.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the eight (8) samples.
3.3.4 Asbestos-Cement Products Asbestos cement products, in the forms of sheeting and exterior siding, were observed on walls throughout the subject location. Asbestos‐containing cement panels were also observed within a piece of machinery in the central section of Building 3C (Covered Corridor).
A total of four (4) sample sets, consisting of twelve (12) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐10A‐C, E11‐534‐18A‐C, E11‐534‐58A‐C and E11‐534‐74A‐C) of cement boards and siding observed at the subject location, were collected as part of the survey.
CEG sample E11‐534‐10A, collected from the west interior wall of the west vacant area on the 1st floor of Building 2, was found to contain 20% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐10B, collected from the west interior wall of the west vacant area on the 1st floor of Building 2, was found to contain 25% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐10C, collected from the west interior wall of the west vacant area on the 1st floor of Building 2, was found to contain 20% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐18A, collected from the central wall on the 1st floor of Building 3A, was found to contain 20% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐18B, collected from the central wall on the 1st floor of Building 3A, was found to contain 20% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐18C, collected from the central wall on the 1st floor of Building 3A, was found to contain 15% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐58A, collected from the wall of the 3rd floor storage corridor of Building 6B‐1, was found to contain 15% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐58B, collected from the wall of the 3rd floor storage corridor of Building 6B‐1, was found to contain 20% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐58C, collected from the wall of the 3rd floor storage corridor of Building 6B‐1, was found to contain 20% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐74A, collected adjacent to the south wall of Building 6A‐2, was found to contain 20% Chrysotile asbestos. The remaining two (2) samples in the set were not analyzed per a stop positive approach.
Based on the above results all cement sheeting in all areas of the subject location shall be assumed asbestos‐containing until proven otherwise by bulk sampling and analysis.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
12
3.3.5 Ceiling Tiles
Suspended Ceiling Tiles Suspended Ceiling Tiles (SCTs) were observed throughout the subject location.
A total of eight (8) sample sets, consisting of twenty‐four (24) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐24A‐C, E11‐534‐25A‐C, E11‐534‐42A‐C, E11‐534‐50A‐C, E11‐534‐51A‐C, E11‐534‐56A‐C, E11‐534‐87A‐C and E11‐534‐102A‐C) of SCTs observed at the subject location were collected as part of the survey.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the twenty‐four (24) samples.
Laminated Ceiling Tiles Laminated Ceiling Tiles (LCTs) were observed on the 4th floor of Building 1B, the office area of Building 5B and the office area on the 1st floor of the Cockshutt Building at the subject location.
A total of two (2) sample sets, consisting of six (6) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐1A‐C and E11‐534‐34A‐C) of LCTs observed at the subject location were collected as part of the survey.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the six (6) samples.
3.3.6 Drywall Joint Compound Drywall Joint Compound (DJC) was observed on walls and ceilings throughout the subject location.
A total of nine (9) sample sets, consisting of forty (40) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐11A‐G, E11‐534‐27A‐C, E11‐534‐32A‐C, E11‐534‐33A‐C, E11‐534‐41A‐H, E11‐534‐55A‐C, E11‐534‐61A‐C, E11‐534‐84A‐C and E11‐534‐85A‐G) of DJC observed at the subject location, were collected as part of the survey.
CEG sample E11‐534‐33A, collected from the ceiling of the washroom on the 1st floor of Building 5B, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐33B, collected from the ceiling of the washroom on the 1st floor of Building 5B, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐33C, collected from the ceiling of the washroom on the 1st floor of Building 5B, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐41A, collected from the wall of the 2nd floor kitchen in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐41B, collected from the wall of the 2nd floor kitchen in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐41C, collected from the wall of the 2nd floor kitchen in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐41D, collected from the wall of the 2nd floor office area in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 4% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐41E, collected from the wall of the 2nd floor office area in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐41F, collected from the wall of the 2nd floor office area in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐41G, collected from the wall of the 2nd floor office area in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 4% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐41H, collected from the wall of the 1st floor office area in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the remaining twenty‐nine (29) samples.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
13
3.3.7 Plaster Plaster was observed on support columns in the north section of Building 6A‐1, the interior walls of the Time Keepers Building and the interior walls of the Cockshutt Building.
A total of three (3) sample sets, consisting of fifteen (15) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐38A‐C, E11‐534‐97A‐E and E11‐534‐101A‐G) of plaster observed at the subject location, were collected as part of the survey.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the fifteen (15) samples.
3.3.8 Vinyl Floor Tiles Vinyl Floor Tiles (VFTs) were observed on floors in Building 6A‐1, Building 6B‐2, Building 6A‐2, Building 2 and the Time Keepers Building at the subject location.
A total of eleven (11) sample sets, consisting of thirty‐three (33) samples (CEG Samples E11‐534‐39A‐C, E11‐534‐40A‐C, E11‐534‐43A‐C, E11‐534‐46A‐C, E11‐534‐48A‐C, E11‐534‐49A‐C, E11‐534‐52A‐C, E11‐534‐60A‐C, E11‐534‐86A‐C, E11‐534‐98A‐C and E11‐534‐99A‐C) of VFTs observed at the subject location, were collected as part of the survey.
CEG sample E11‐534‐39A, collected from the floor of the southwest vestibule on the 1st floor in Building 6A‐1, was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐39B, collected from the floor of the southwest vestibule on the 1st floor of Building 6A‐1, was found to contain 4% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐39C, collected from the floor of the southwest vestibule on the 1st floor of Building 6A‐1, was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐40A, collected from the floor of the 1st floor shower/locker area in Building 6A‐1, was found to contain 4% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐40B, collected from the floor of the 1st floor shower/locker area in Building 6A‐1, was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐40C, collected from the floor of the 1st floor shower/locker area in Building 6A‐1, was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐43A, collected from the floor of the 2nd floor kitchen in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐43B, collected from the floor of the 2nd floor kitchen in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 4% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐43C, collected from the floor of the 2nd floor kitchen in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 5% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐46A, collected from the floor below the carpet in the 2nd floor office area in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐46B, collected from the floor below the carpet in the 2nd floor office area in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐46C, collected from the floor below the carpet in the 2nd floor office area in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 4% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐48A, collected from the floor of the 2nd floor men’s washroom in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐48B, collected from the floor of the 2nd floor men’s washroom in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐48C, collected from the floor of the 2nd floor men’s washroom in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
14
CEG sample E11‐534‐49A, collected from the floor of the 2nd floor women’s washroom in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐49B, collected from the floor of the 2nd floor women’s washroom in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐49C, collected from the floor of the 2nd floor women’s washroom in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐52A, collected from the floor of the 1st floor Janitor’s Closet in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐52B, collected from the floor of the 1st floor Janitor’s Closet in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐52C, collected from the floor of the 1st floor Janitor’s Closet in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐60A, collected from the floor of the 2nd floor training room of Building 6A‐2, was found to contain 6% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐60B, collected from the floor of the 2nd floor training room of Building 6A‐2, was found to contain 5% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐60C, collected from the floor of the 2nd floor training room of Building 6A‐2, was found to contain 4% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐98A, collected from the floor of the west section of the Time Keepers Building, was found to contain 8% Chrysotile asbestos. The remaining two (2) samples in the set were not analyzed per a stop positive approach.
CEG sample E11‐534‐99A, collected from the floor of the west section of the Time Keepers Building, was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos. The remaining samples in the set were not analyzed per a stop positive approach.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the remaining three (3) samples.
3.3.9 Vinyl Sheet Flooring Vinyl sheet flooring was observed on the floor of a former office area adjacent to the northwest electrical room of Building 5B.
A total of one (1) sample set, consisting of three (3) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐36A‐C), was collected as part of the survey.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the three (3) samples.
3.3.10 Mastics Black mastic, used as an adhesive for VFTs, was observed throughout all areas of the subject location were VFT’s are present.
A total of two (2) sample sets, consisting of six (6) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐44A‐C and E11‐534‐100A‐C) of black mastic observed at the subject location, was collected as part of the survey.
CEG sample E11‐534‐44A, collected from below the VFTs in the 2nd floor kitchen of Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 5% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐44B, collected from below the VFTs in the 2nd floor kitchen of Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 5% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐44C, collected from below the VFTs in the 2nd floor kitchen of Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 5% Chrysotile asbestos.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
15
CEG sample E11‐100A, collected from below the VFTs on the floor in the west section of the Time Keepers Building, was found to contain 15% Chrysotile asbestos. The remaining samples in the set were not analyzed per a stop positive approach.
In addition to samples of black mastic collected as part of this survey, black mastic present on samples of VFTs submitted for analysis was also analyzed for asbestos content.
A total of twenty‐one (21) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐39A‐C, E11‐534‐40A‐C, E11‐534‐46C, E11‐534‐48C, E11‐534‐49C, E11‐534‐52A‐C, E11‐534‐60A‐C, E11‐534‐98A‐C and E11‐534‐99A‐C) of the black mastic present on samples of VFTs submitted for analysis, were analyzed as part of this project.
CEG sample E11‐534‐39A, collected from the floor of the southwest vestibule on the 1st floor of Building 6A‐1, was found to contain 5% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐39B, collected from the floor of the southwest vestibule on the 1st floor of Building 6A‐1, was found to contain 5% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐39C, collected from the floor of the southwest vestibule on the 1st floor of Building 6A‐1, was found to contain 4% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐40A, collected from the floor of the 1st floor shower/locker room in Building 6A‐1, was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐40B, collected from the floor of the 1st floor shower/locker room in Building 6A‐1, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐40C, collected from the floor of the 1st floor shower/locker room in Building 6A‐1, was found to contain 4% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐46C, collected from the floor under the carpet in the 2nd floor office area of Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐48C, collected from the 2nd floor men’s washroom in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐49C, collected from the 2nd floor women’s washroom in Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐60A, collected from the floor of the training room on the 2nd floor of Building 6A‐2, was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐60B, collected from the floor of the training room on the 2nd floor of Building 6A‐2, was found to contain 4% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐60C, collected from the floor of the training room on the 2nd floor of Building 6A‐2, was found to contain 4% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐98A, collected from the floor of the west section of the Time Keepers Building, was found to contain 6% Chrysotile asbestos. The remaining samples in the set were not analyzed per a stop positive approach.
CEG sample E11‐534‐99A, collected from the floor of the west section of the Time Keepers Building, was found to contain 6% Chrysotile asbestos. The remaining samples in the set were not analyzed per a stop positive approach.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the remaining three (3) samples collected and analyzed.
3.3.11 Sealants
White Caulking White caulking, used as a sealant was observed on window frames throughout the subject location.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
16
A total of eight (8) sample sets, consisting of thirty‐two (32) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐2A‐G, E11‐534‐14A‐G, E11‐534‐15A‐C, E11‐534‐23A‐C, E11‐534‐26A‐C, E11‐534‐28A‐C, E11‐534‐57A‐C and E11‐534‐77A‐C) of white caulking observed at the subject location, were collected as part of the survey.
CEG sample E11‐534‐2A, collected from a window from on the 4th floor of Building 1B, was found to contain <0.25% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐2B, collected from a window from on the 4th floor of Building 1B, was found to contain <0.25% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐2C, collected from a window from on the 4th floor of Building 1B, was found to contain <0.25% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐2D, collected from a window from on the 3rd floor of Building 1B, was found to contain <0.25% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐2F, collected from a window from on the 3rd floor of Building 1B, was found to contain <0.25% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐2G, collected from a window from on the 2nd floor of Building 1B, was found to contain <0.25% Chrysotile asbestos. Asbestos was not detected in the remaining sample. It is noted that a result of <0.25% asbestos does not constitute an asbestos‐containing material.
CEG sample E11‐534‐14C, collected from a window frame on the 1st floor of Building 3A, was found to contain <0.25% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐14E, collected from a window frame on the 1st floor of Building 3A, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐14F, collected from a window frame on the 1st floor of Building 3A, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐14G, collected from a window frame on the 1st floor of Building 3A, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. Asbestos was not detected in any of the remaining three (3) samples.
CEG sample E11‐534‐15A, collected from a window frame on the 1st floor of Building 3A, was found to contain <0.25% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐15B, collected from a window frame on the 1st floor of Building 3A, was found to contain <0.25% Chrysotile asbestos. Asbestos was not detected in the remaining sample. It is noted that a result of <0.25% asbestos does not constitute an asbestos‐containing material.
CEG sample E11‐534‐26C, collected from a window frame on Building 4, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. Asbestos was not detected in any of the remaining two (2) samples.
CEG sample E11‐534‐28C, collected from a window frame in Building 3B‐2, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. Asbestos was not detected in any of the remaining two (2) samples.
CEG sample E11‐534‐57A, collected from a window frame on the 1st floor of Building 6B‐1, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐57B, collected from a window frame on the 1st floor of Building 6B‐1, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐57C, collected from a window frame on the 1st floor of Building 6B‐1, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos.
CEG sample E11‐534‐77A, collected from a south window frame of Building 6A‐1, was found to contain <0.25% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐77B, collected from a south window frame of Building 6A‐1, was found to contain 0.25% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐77C, collected from a south window frame of Building 6A‐1, was found to contain 0.50% Chrysotile asbestos. Asbestos was not detected in any of the remaining three (3) samples.
Brown Caulking: Brown caulking, used as a sealant, was observed on window frames in Building 5B at the subject location.
A total of one (1) sample set, consisting of three (3) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐35A‐C) of brown caulking observed at the subject location, was collected as part of the survey.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
17
CEG sample E11‐534‐35A, collected from a window frame on Building 5B, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐35B, collected from a window frame on Building 5B, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐35C, collected from a window frame on Building 5B, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos.
Grey Sealant: A grey sealant was observed on the north wall of the 2nd floor storage area of Building 6A‐2 at the subject location.
A total of one (1) sample set, consisting of three (3) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐59A‐C) of grey sealant observed at the subject location, was collected as part of the survey.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the three (3) samples.
Grey Caulking: Grey caulking, used as a sealant, was observed between the gaps of exterior brick work on Building 9 at the subject location.
A total of one (1) sample set, consisting of three (3) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐67A‐C) of grey caulking observed at the subject location was collected as part of the survey.
CEG sample E11‐534‐67A, collected from a gap in the exterior brick work of Building 9, was found to contain 10% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐67B, collected from a gap in the exterior brick work of Building 9, was found to contain 10% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐67C, collected from a gap in the exterior brick work of Building 9, was found to contain 15% Chrysotile asbestos.
Green Caulking: Green caulking, used as a sealant, was observed on window frames on the south wall of Building 3B‐3, at the subject location.
A total of one (1) sample set, consisting of three (3) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐90A‐C) of green caulking observed at the subject location, was collected as part of the survey.
CEG sample E11‐534‐90A, collected from a window frame on the south wall of Building 3B‐3, was found to contain <0.25% Chrysotile asbestos.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the remaining two (2) samples collected and analyzed. It is noted that a result of <0.25% asbestos does not constitute an asbestos‐containing material.
White Sealant: White sealant was observed between the gaps of the exterior brick work of Building 6B‐2 at the subject location.
A total of one (1) sample set, consisting of three (3) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐93A‐C) of white sealant observed at the subject location, was collected as part of the survey.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the three (3) samples.
Black Caulking: Black caulking, used as a sealant, was observed on the northeast window frame of Building 9 at the subject location.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
18
A total of one (1) sample set, consisting of three (3) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐68A‐C) of black caulking observed at the subject location, was collected as part of the survey.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the three (3) samples.
3.3.12 Roofing Materials Accessible roofing materials, and roofing materials present in buildings as a result of roof collapses, were collected as part of this survey. Due to concerns related to the structural integrity of roofs throughout the subject location, materials were collected from areas that did not involve accessing roof surfaces.
Black Shingles: Black shingles were observed in the debris from the collapse of Building 3B‐4, on the roof of Building 4 and on the roof of the Time Keepers Building at the subject location.
A total of three (3) sample sets, consisting of nine (9) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐29A‐C, E11‐534‐62A‐C and E11‐534‐72A‐C) of black shingles observed at the subject location, were collected as part of the survey.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the nine (9) samples.
Brown Shingles: Brown shingles were observed in the debris from the collapse of Building 3B‐4 and on the northeast exterior finish of Building 6B‐1 at the subject location.
A total of three (3) samples sets, consisting of nine (9) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐30A‐C, E11‐534‐94A‐C and E11‐534‐95A‐C) of brown shingles observed at the subject location, were collected as part of the survey.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the nine (9) samples collected and analyzed.
Green Shingles: Green shingles were observed on the roof of Building 11 at the subject location.
A total of one (1) sample set, consisting of three (3) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐37A‐C) of green shingles observed at the subject location, were collected as part of the survey.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the nine (9) samples collected and analyzed.
Roofing Felt: Roofing felt was observed in the debris from the roof collapse in Building 3B‐4, on the roof of Building 4 and the roof of Building 9 at the subject location.
A total of three (3) sample sets, consisting of nine (9) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐31A‐C, E11‐534‐63A‐C and E11‐534‐69A‐C) of roofing felt observed at the subject location, were collected as part of the survey.
CEG sample E11‐534‐69A, collected from the roof of Building 9, was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐69B, collected from the roof of Building 9, was found to contain 4% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐69C, collected from the roof of Building 9, was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
19
Asbestos was not detected in any of the remaining six (6) samples.
Roofing Tar and Substrate Materials: Roofing tars and substrate materials were observed as debris from roof collapses throughout the subject location.
A total of three (3) samples sets, consisting of twenty‐one (21) samples (E11‐534‐7A‐G, E11‐534‐19A‐G and E11‐534‐54A‐G) of roofing tars and felts observed at the subject location, were collected as part of the survey.
CEG sample E11‐534‐19A, collected from debris from the collapse of sections of the roof in Building 3C (Covered Corridor), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐19B, collected from debris from the collapse of sections of the roof in Building 3C (Covered Corridor), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐19C, collected from debris from the collapse of sections of the roof in Building 3C (Covered Corridor), was found to contain 4% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐19D, collected from debris from the collapse of sections of the roof in Building 3C (Covered Corridor), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐19E, collected from debris from the collapse of sections of the roof in Building 3C (Covered Corridor), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐19F, collected from debris from the collapse of sections of the roof in Building 3C (Covered Corridor), was found to contain 2% Chrysotile asbestos. Asbestos was not detected in the remaining sample.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the remaining fourteen (14) samples.
Historically asbestos has been known to be present within roofing materials. As the roofs of the majority of the buildings on the subject location could not be accessed due to health and safety concerns, all roofing materials other than those sampled shall be assumed asbestos‐containing until proven otherwise throughout bulk sampling and analysis.
3.3.13 Other Asbestos-Containing Materials
Rigid Black Liner A rigid black liner was observed in a damaged toilet bowl in the washroom on the 4th floor of Building 1B at the subject location.
A total of one (1) sample set, consisting of three (3) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐3A‐C) of the rigid black liner observed at the subject location, was collected as part of the survey.
CEG sample E11‐534‐3A, collected from a toilet bowl on the 4th floor of Building 1B, was found to contain 12% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐3B, collected from a toilet bowl on the 4th floor of Building 1B, was found to contain 12% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐3C, collected from a toilet bowl on the 4th floor of Building 1B, was found to contain 18% Chrysotile asbestos.
White Flexible Joint Material White flexible joint material was observed between the doors at the far west end of Building 3C (Covered Corridor) at the subject location.
A total of one (1) sample set, consisting of three (3) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐21A‐C) of white flexible joint material observed at the subject location was collected as part of the survey.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the three (3) samples.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
20
White Heat Shield A white heat shield was observed in a light fixture in the kitchen and electrical room on the 2nd floor of Building 6B‐2 (Administration) at the subject location.
A total of one (1) sample set, consisting of three (3) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐45A‐C) of the white head shield observed at the subject location, was collected as part of the survey.
CEG sample E11‐534‐45A, collected from the light fixture in the 2nd floor kitchen of Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 25% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐45B, collected from the light fixture in the 2nd floor kitchen of Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 30% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐45C, collected from the light fixture in the 2nd floor kitchen of Building 6B‐2 (Administration), was found to contain 25% Chrysotile asbestos.
White Tape White tape, used as a sealant, was observed on the joints in the duct work above the suspended ceiling on the 2nd floor of Building 6B‐2 (Administration) at the subject location.
A total of one (1) sample set, consisting of three (3) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐47A‐C) of white tape observed at the subject location, was collected as part of the survey.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the three (3) samples.
White Joint Filler White joint filling material was observed between a concrete support column and a gypsum wall in the 2nd floor west work area in Building 1B at the subject location.
A total of one (1) sample set, consisting of three (3) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐6A‐C) of white joint filler observed at the subject location, was collected as part of the survey.
CEG sample E11‐534‐6A, collected from between the concrete support column and the gypsum wall of the 2nd floor west work area in Building 1B, was found to contain 5% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐6B, collected from between the concrete support column and the gypsum wall of the 2nd floor west work area in Building 1B, was found to contain 5% Chrysotile asbestos. CEG sample E11‐534‐6C, collected from between the concrete support column and the gypsum wall of the 2nd floor west work area in Building 1B, was found to contain 3% Chrysotile asbestos.
Gaskets A gasket was observed on the doors of the boiler housing in the Boiler Room of Building 3B‐3 at the subject location.
A total of one (1) sample set, consisting of three (3) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐81A‐C) of gaskets observed at the subject location, was collected as part of the survey.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the three (3) samples collected and analyzed.
Flexible Duct Joint Material Flexible joint material was observed the joint of a duct in the central section of Building 3C (Covered Corridor) at the subject.
Samples of this material could not be collected as part of the survey as the structure supporting the duct was severely water damaged and deteriorated to the point where accessing the material could result in collapse causing severe bodily harm to anyone working in proximity to the unit. As a result, this flexible
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
21
duct joint material shall be assumed asbestos‐containing until proven otherwise through bulk sampling and analysis.
Brick Mortar Brick mortar was observed on the majority of exterior finishes throughout the subject location.
A total of seventeen (17) sample sets, consisting of one‐hundred and nine (109) samples (CEG samples E11‐534‐8A‐G, E11‐534‐9A‐G, E11‐534‐12A‐G, E11‐534‐13A‐G, E11‐534‐64A‐G, E11‐534‐65A‐G, E11‐534‐66A‐G, E11‐534‐70A‐C, E11‐534‐71A‐C, E11‐534‐73A‐G, E11‐534‐76A‐G, E11‐534‐78A‐E, E11‐534‐79A‐G, E11‐534‐88A‐G, E11‐534‐89A‐G, E11‐534‐91A‐G and E11‐534‐92A‐G), of brick mortar observed at the subject location were collected as part of the survey.
CEG sample E11‐534‐8A, collected from the west exterior wall of Building 1B, was found to contain <0.25% Chrysotile asbestos. It is noted that a result of <0.25% asbestos does not constitute an asbestos‐containing material.
Asbestos was not detected in any of the remaining one‐hundred and eight (108) samples collected and analyzed.
Refractory Brick Refractory brick was observed in the boilers within the Boiler house of Building 3B‐3. No samples of this material were collected as the interior of the boilers could not be safely accessed.
Historically, refractory brick is known to have contained asbestos. It shall be assumed to be asbestos‐containing until proven otherwise through bulk sampling and analysis.
Loose Fill Insulation (Vermiculite) Historically there is evidence that asbestos‐containing loose fill insulation (vermiculite) was used in the cavities of cinder block walls. As part of this survey, the cavities within various cinder block walls throughout the subject location were inspected for the presence of loose fill insulation. None of the cinder block walls inspected at the subject location were found to contain loose fill insulation. Should loose fill insulation be observed during any construction, renovation or demolition activates undertaken at the subject location, it shall be assumed asbestos‐containing until proven otherwise through bulk sampling and analysis.
Fire Doors Fire doors were observed throughout almost all buildings of the subject location.
The insulation within fire doors at the subject location was not assessed as part of the survey. In order to maintain the door’s fire rating, they were not damaged for the purpose of inspect their interiors. All of the insulation present within all fire doors at the subject location shall be assumed asbestos‐containing until proven otherwise through bulk sampling and analysis.
Asbestos Waste Bags During the survey of the subject location several yellow bags marked as asbestos waste were observed in the north‐western office area of Building 5B. The contents of the bags were not inspected as part of the survey in order to avoid the potential release of asbestos fibres. The contents of the bags shall be assumed asbestos‐containing and should be disposed as per applicable regulations.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
22
3.4 Lead Survey Results Lead‐containing paints were identified throughout all buildings at the subject location. Figures 2‐1 to 2‐29 in Appendix A illustrate the XRF Spot Test locations taken throughout the subject location during the survey. The results of XRF spot testing of painted surfaces for lead are shown in Table 2 of Appendix B.
Summarized below is a building by building breakdown of the lead‐containing paints present at the subject location. It is noted that the majority of painted surfaces within the subject location were found to be cracked, peeling and damaged.
3.4.1 347 Greenwich Street
Building 1A A total of three (3) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 1A at the subject location. All three (3) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
Beige, Yellow and White paints had concentrations ranging from 0.14 mg/cm2 to 1.4 mg/cm2. All painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 1B A total of twenty‐two (22) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 1B at the subject location. Twenty (20) of the painted surfaces tested were to found to be lead‐containing.
Green, white, beige, yellow, red and brown paints had concentrations ranging from 0.05 mg/cm2 to 2.0 mg/cm2. These painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 2 A total of eleven (11) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 2 at the subject location. Nine (9) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
White, green, red, yellow, beige and purple paints had concentrations ranging from 0.01 mg/cm2 to 5.4 mg/cm2. These painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 3A A total of twenty‐one (21) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 3A at the subject location. Twenty (20) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
Yellow, white, green, black, lime and red paints had concentrations ranging from 0.03 mg/cm2 to 12.6 mg/cm2. These painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 3B-1 A total of five (5) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 3B‐1 at the subject location. All five (5) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
Green, white, dark green, yellow and red paints had concentrations ranging from 0.07 mg/cm2 to 13.6 mg/cm2. All painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 3B-2 A total of sixteen (16) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 3B‐2 at the subject location. Fourteen (14) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
23
White, black, aqua, dark green, light green, yellow and grey paints had concentrations ranging from 0.06 mg/cm2 to 6.15 mg/cm2. These painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 3B-3 A total of four (4) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 3B‐3 at the subject location. Two (2) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
White and green paints had concentrations ranging from 0.5 mg/cm2 to 1.5 mg/cm2. These painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 3B-4 A total of two (2) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 3B‐4 at the subject location. Both of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
White and beige paints had concentrations ranging from 0.3 mg/cm2 to 0.6 mg/cm2. All painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 3B-5 A total of three (3) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 3B‐5 at the subject location. All three (3) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
White and grey paints had concentrations ranging from 0.01 mg/cm2 to 0.13 mg/cm2. All painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 3B-6 Painted surfaces present within Building 3B‐6 could not be tested as part of this survey due to the health and safety concerns associated with the imminent collapse of the roof. All painted surfaces within the building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 3C (Covered Corridor) A total of eighteen (18) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 3C (Covered Corridor) at the subject location. Thirteen (13) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
Green, light blue, yellow, red, white, lime, dark green and orange paints had concentrations ranging from 0.01 mg/cm2 to 9.1 mg/cm2. These painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 4 (Garage) A total of nine (9) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 4 (Garage) at the subject location. Eight (8) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
Green, black, lime, dark green, yellow and grey paints had concentrations ranging from 0.02 mg/cm2 to 2.8 mg/cm2. These painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 5A-1 A total of six (6) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 5A‐1 at the subject location. Three (3) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
White and grey paints had concentrations ranging from 0.01 mg/cm2 to 0.08 mg/cm2. These painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
24
Building 5A-2 A total of four (4) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 5A‐2 at the subject location. All four (4) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
White and red paints had concentrations ranging from 0.3 mg/cm2 to 2.3 mg/cm2. All painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 5B A total of eleven (11) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 5B at the subject location. Eight (8) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
White, green, red, beige and grey paints had concentrations ranging from 0.14 mg/cm2 to 3.2 mg/cm2. These painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 6A-1 A total of six (6) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 6A‐1 at the subject location. All six (6) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
Green, white and orange paints had concentrations ranging from 0.01 mg/cm2 to 2.4 mg/cm2. All painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 6A-2 (Administration) A total of twenty‐five (25) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 6A‐2 at the subject location. Twenty‐four (24) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
Green, black, red, white, brown, yellow, grey, lime, beige, light blue and blue paints had concentrations ranging from 0.02 mg/cm2 to 2.9 mg/cm2. These painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 6B-1 A total of fourteen (14) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 6B‐1 at the subject location. Eight (8) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
Green, yellow, sky blue, white and grey paints had concentrations ranging from 0.22 mg/cm2 to 3.2 mg/cm2. These painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 6B-2 A total of ten (10) XRF Spot Tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 6B‐2 at the subject location. Six (6) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
Off‐white, white, brown, aqua and lime paints had concentrations ranging from 0.01 mg/cm2 to 0.18 mg/cm2. These painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 8 A total of four (4) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 8 at the subject location. All four (4) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
Purple, orange and red paints had concentrations ranging from 0.21 mg/cm2 to 1.6 mg/cm2. All painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
25
Building 9 A total of two (2) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 9 at the subject location. One (1) of the painted surfaces tested was found to be lead‐containing.
Yellow paint had a concentration of 7.8 mg/cm2. All yellow paint within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 10 A total of three (3) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within Building 10 at the subject location. Two (2) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
White and purple paints both had a concentration of 0.01 mg/cm2. These painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Building 11 One (1) XRF spot test was performed on painted surfaces within Building 11 at the subject location. The painted surface tested was found to be lead‐containing.
Red paint had a concentration of 0.19 mg/cm2. All red paint within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
3.4.2 66 Mohawk Street
Cockshutt Building (Building 2) A total of six (6) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within the Cockshutt Building at the subject location. Five (5) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
Off‐white, white, brown and red paints had concentrations ranging from 0.02 mg/cm2 to 18.0 mg/cm2. These painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
Time Keepers Office (Building1) A total of five (5) XRF spot tests were performed on painted surfaces within the Time Keepers Building at the subject location. All five (5) of the painted surfaces tested were found to be lead‐containing.
Light brown and white paints had concentrations ranging from 0.02 mg/cm2 to 8.4 mg/cm2. All painted surfaces within this building should be assumed to contain lead.
3.4.3 Other Lead Containing Materials Lead is assumed to be present in the solder joints of copper piping present throughout the subject location.
3.5 Mercury Survey Results Mercury was identified in various thermostats throughout at the subject location. In addition, fluorescent tubes, known to contain varying levels of mercury vapour, were observed throughout the subject location.
Mercury may also be present as a component within certain electrical equipment such as position dependent switches and pressure gauges as well as potentially being present in paints and adhesives.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
26
3.6 Silica Survey Results Silica is presumed to be present throughout the subject location in materials such as bricks, concrete, mortar, and fillers for paints and adhesives. These types of materials were prevalent throughout the building structures and require consideration in advance of their disturbance.
3.7 Other Designated Substances Survey Results
3.7.1 Acrylonitrile Acrylonitrile was not identified at the subject location and is not expected to be found.
3.7.2 Arsenic Arsenic was not identified at the subject location. Arsenic may be present within paints and adhesives.
3.7.3 Benzene Benzene was not identified at the subject location. Benzene may be present within roofing materials, paints and adhesives as a constituent of hydrocarbon based mixtures.
3.7.4 Coke Oven Emissions Coke oven emissions were not identified at the subject location and are not expected to be present.
3.7.5 Ethylene Oxide Ethylene Oxide were not identified at the subject facility and is not expected to be present.
3.7.6 Isocyanates Isocyanates were not identified at the subject location. Isocyanates may be present within paint finishes.
3.7.7 Vinyl Chloride Vinyl chloride was not identified at the subject location. Vinyl chloride may be present within PVC piping and conduits.
3.8 Hazardous Materials Survey Results
3.8.1 PCBs The description and locations of confirmed or suspected PCB‐containing light ballasts that were observed during the survey are shown in Table 4 of Appendix B.
The use of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in building materials and equipment ceased in the late 1970’s with a few residual products being available during the early 1980’s. Fluorescent light fixtures were observed throughout all areas of the subject location. As part of the survey, the labels on ballasts present within these fluorescent light fixtures were inspected in order to determine their PCB content. A number of the ballasts inspected were suspected of being PCB‐containing, including those observed on a pallet in Building 3B‐1. Other ballasts inspected were marked as “Non PCB”.
During the survey, a former PCB storage site was observed within Building 8. Materials are no longer stored within the enclosure and there was no evidence of staining or other contamination.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
27
It should be noted that during the survey the labels on a large number of ballast could not be inspected as a result of either, the inaccessibility of fluorescent light fixtures due to significant deterioration to their housings (e.g. rusting) or, the illegibility of labels, compromised due to water infiltration and wearing.
A number of transformers were observed around the exterior of the subject location, however these units were not included in the scope of work as a PCB Inventory has recently been completed by others. The inventory identified 54 transformers with a PCB concentration of less than 50 ppm, 13 transformers with a PCB concentration of between 50 and 500 ppm, and three transformers with a PCB concentration of greater than 500 ppm. Additionally, other empty transformers, capacitors, stockpiled PCB‐containing light ballasts, and buckets and drums of unidentified oils were identified.
3.8.2 Stored Materials The description and locations of potentially hazardous stored materials that were observed during the survey are shown in Table 4 of Appendix B.
A number of potentially hazardous materials were observed to be stored in a variety storage media (various sized containers and drums) throughout the subject location. Due to high levels of deterioration on a majority of the labels, considering the length of time that has likely passed since they were originally stored, identification of the materials was often not possible. In addition to these stored products, a number of small and large compressed gas cylinders were identified throughout the subject location. Their contents (or lack there of) could not be verified due to health and safety concerns. A number of stored batteries were also noted within Building 3B‐1 at the subject location.
All potentially hazardous materials stored throughout the subject location should be disposed following applicable regulations.
3.8.3 Mould As part of the room by room survey completed by CEG at the subject location, observations were made regarding the visual presence of mould on building materials.
Abundant evidence of mould growth was observed on gypsum, wood, paper‐based products and other organic surfaces throughout all buildings at the subject location. An excessive amount of water infiltration into the interior of the structures has created ideal growing conditions for mould and its presence is prolific, where provided said substrates.
Without the removal of water infiltration into the buildings, mould growth will continue to occur throughout the subject location.
3.8.4 Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) The description and locations of observed or suspected ODS‐containing materials is shown in Table 5 of Appendix B.
ODSs are used mainly as coolants in refrigerant and air‐conditioning equipment. The release of ODSs from cooling equipment can be caused by leaks as well as during installation and servicing.
Two refrigeration units and a window mounted air‐conditioner were observed at the subject location during the survey. The labels present on all of these units were inspected for their refrigerant‐type and information recorded as part of the survey. The refrigerator located within the west section of the Time
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
28
Keepers Office and the window mounted air‐conditioning unit in the western office section of Building 6B‐1 were found to contain ODSs. The refrigerator located within the west apartment on the 2nd floor of Building 2 did not have a label indicating the type of refrigerant used. As such, it is assumed to contain ODSs. A limited number of fire extinguishers were identified throughout the subject location, which have the potential of containing ODSs.
3.8.5 Radon Gas In 2007, Health Canada announced a revised guideline for radon levels in indoor air. Federal, provincial and territorial governments have worked together to develop a new guideline to help protect Canadians from the health risks associated with radon. The new guideline is established at 200 Bq/m3, above which, Health Canada recommends action be taken to reduce the level of radon in one’s home (e.g. by ventilation).
As all buildings within the scope of work at the subject location are vacant, the risk associated with the potential presence of radon gas currently represents a non‐issue. The ongoing monitoring for radon gas may be a decision for future occupants of a developed site to consider regarding the air quality of their indoor environments.
3.8.6 Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation (UFFI) No UFFI was observed at the subject facility and is not expected to be present.
4.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
4.1 General Designated substances and hazardous materials were identified during the course of CEG’s survey. A summary of the findings and related recommendations are provided below with complete details presented in the relevant report sections.
Survey limitations resulted from the various states of disrepair, and health and safety challenges, present within buildings at the subject location.
Due to the deterioration of structural components, the presence of damaged asbestos‐containing materials, and the abundance of mould impacted materials, access to all buildings at the subject location should be limited to individuals equipped with appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE).
Designated substances (and hazardous materials) require removal, to the extent practicable, prior to their disturbance during any selective demolition and/or shoring/stabilization techniques employed for the purpose of working toward an adaptive reuse of buildings with heritage value (discussed within the Heritage Impact Statement by Taylor Hazell Architects and the Structural Conditions Analysis by Picco Engineering) or complete demolition (or other reworking) of other on‐site buildings (not included in the Structural Condition/Heritage Impact Assessment).
4.2 Asbestos-Containing Materials A total of four hundred and twenty‐six (426) bulk material samples were taken of suspected asbestos‐containing materials throughout all buildings at the subject location. One hundred and three (103) of these samples were confirmed to contain varying percentages of asbestos content (ranging from 0.5% to
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
29
45% Chrysotile and 4% to 30% Amosite), and included materials categorized under: Mechanical Systems Insulation, Drywall Joint Compound and Filler Materials, Asbestos Cement Products, Caulking, Roofing Materials, Vinyl Floor Tiles, Black Mastic, Light Fixture Heat Shield, and Rigid Black Liner. These materials were observed in one or more of the following buildings:
347 Greenwich Street
Buildings: 1A, 1B, 2, 3A, 3B‐1, 3B‐2, 3B‐3, 3C (Covered Corridor), 4, 5A‐2, 5B, 6A‐1, 6A‐2, 6B‐1, 6B‐2 (Administration), and 9; and
66 Mohawk Street
Time Keepers Building (1).
It is noted that the majority of ACMs identified throughout the subject location ranged in condition from fair to poor. Furthermore, there is the potential that unidentified materials exist on‐site. In addition, various observed, but inaccessible materials have been assumed to contain asbestos until such time that their contents are able to be verified by sampling and analysis.
CEG recommendations, based on the findings of the survey, are summarized below:
1. A copy of this report shall be provided to all contractors and other workers bidding on or performing work within the subject location.
2. All asbestos‐containing materials that are in fair to poor condition or those materials that are likely to be disturbed during work performed at the subject location should be removed following the appropriate Operation Type as outlined in O. Reg. 278/05.
3. Removal of asbestos‐containing mechanical systems insulation will require Type 2 Operations if removal of <1m2 of material is required, or Type 2 (Glove Bag) or Type 3 Operations if removal of >1m2 of material is required, as outlined within O. Reg. 278/05.
4. Removal of the asbestos‐containing black liner will require Type 1 Operations as outlined in O. Reg. 278/05.
5. Removal of asbestos‐containing drywall joint compound will require Type 1 (<1m2) or Type 2 (>1m2) Operations as outlined in O. Reg. 278/05.
6. Removal of asbestos‐containing cement products will require Type 1 Operations as outlined in O. Reg. 278/05.
7. Removal of asbestos‐containing caulking will require Type 1 Operations as outlined in O. Reg. 278/05.
8. Removal of asbestos‐containing roofing materials will require Type 1 Operations as outlined in O. Reg. 278/05.
9. Removal of asbestos‐containing VFTs will require Type 1 Operations as outlined within O. Reg. 278/05.
10. Removal of asbestos‐containing black mastic will require Type 1 Operations as outlined within O. Reg. 278/05.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
30
4.3 Lead Testing for lead in paint was conducted using an X‐ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrum Analyser. A total of Two hundred and twenty‐one (221) spot tests were conducted throughout all buildings at the subject location. One hundred and eighty‐six (186) of these tests were found to contain varying concentrations of lead content ranging from 0.01 mg/cm2 to 18.0 mg/cm2. The colours deemed to contain lead included green (light and dark), black, red, white, off‐white, beige, brown, yellow, grey, orange, lime, purple, aqua, light blue, sky blue and blue paints. One or more of these paints were observed in each building at the subject location. Furthermore, paints were observed to be peeling and flaking at various locations throughout the subject location.
All lead‐containing paint and other lead‐containing materials that are in peeling and flaking or that may be disturbed during work performed at the subject location should be removed following these guidelines:
• Guideline: Lead on Construction Projects (Ontario Ministry of Labour);
• Ontario Regulation 490/09; and
• Regulation for Construction Projects, O. Reg. 213/91.
Prior to demolition is it recommended that representative samples of painted surfaces be submitted for the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) analysis.
Lead is also assumed to be present in the solder joints of copper piping observed throughout the surveyed areas. It is unlikely that any special action will be required during piping removal/replacement work unless the cutting of the pipes at joints is required.
4.4 Mercury Mercury was identified in various thermostats throughout at the subject location. In addition, fluorescent tubes, known to contain varying levels of mercury vapour, were observed throughout the subject location. Mercury may also be present as a component within certain electrical equipment such as position dependent switches and pressure gauges as well as potentially being present in paints and adhesives.
The possibility exists that the fluorescent light bulbs in the building will, when removed, warrant classification as leachate toxic waste. Therefore, it is recommended that all bulbs be removed from the light fixtures prior to demolition activities, consolidated safely, and shipped off‐site for disposal as hazardous waste or to be recycled (as applicable). The Canada Wide Standards have established that bulbs disposed of in amounts greater than 25 are to be classified as hazardous waste and appropriate handling and disposal measures must be adopted as stipulated by O. Reg. 347 for these amounts.
Removal of mercury‐containing materials and equipment shall be completed following all applicable regulations and guidelines, including:
• Ontario Regulation 490/09; and
• Regulation for Construction Projects, O. Reg. 213/91.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
31
4.5 Silica Silica is presumed to be present throughout the subject location in materials such as bricks, concrete, mortar, and fillers for paints and adhesives.
Prior to any demolition activities that may abrade silica‐based products, it is recommended that workers be made aware of the potential for exposure to airborne silica and be instructed in the appropriate use of PPE required, including the use of respirators in accordance with O. Reg. 490/09.
All work undertaken at the subject location that is likely to produce silica dust shall be completed using the following guidelines:
• Guideline: Silica on Construction Projects (Ontario Ministry of Labour);
• Ontario Regulation 490/09; and
• Regulation for Construction Projects, O. Reg. 213/91.
4.6 Other Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials No other designated substances were identified on site.
The ballasts present with fluorescent light fixtures and those ballasts being stored at the subject location shall be examined prior to disposal in order to determine their PCB content. Ballasts found to be PCB‐containing shall be disposed of following applicable regulatory requirements.
All mould impacted materials should be removed from the subject location prior to work being performed, in accordance with the following guidelines:
• Mould Guidelines for the Canadian Construction Industry: Canadian Construction Association;
• Mould Abatement Guidelines: Environmental Abatement Council of Canada;
• Guidelines on Assessment and Remediation of Fungi in Indoor Environments: New York City Department of Health; and
• Standard and Reference Guide for Professional Mold Remediation (IICRC S520): Institute of Inspection, Cleaning and Restoration Certification (IICRC).
Prior to building demolition activities, it is recommended that ODS‐containing equipment be removed for re‐use or disposal. Should disposal be required, the ODS contents of these units should be recovered legally by a licensed professional in advance of their disposal.
Potentially hazardous materials were observed throughout the facility. Prior to building demolition activities, it is recommended that material be removed in advance for re‐use or disposal. Should disposal be required, the contents should be removed and disposed of properly in accordance with O. Reg. 347.
5.0 Closure This report was prepared solely for use of The Corporation of the City of Brantford, its council and applicable committees. The report may not be used by any other person or entity without the express written consent of Cole Engineering Group Ltd. and The Corporation of the City of Brantford.
The Corporation of the City of Brantford DRAFT Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report for the Vacant Buildings Located at the Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site
347 Greenwich Street and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
E11-534 (November, 2011)
32
Cole Engineering Group Ltd. warrants that the findings and conclusions contained herein have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted environmental survey methods. There is a possibility that materials may exist which could not be reasonably identified within the scope of the assessment or which were not apparent during the site visit. Cole Engineering Group Ltd. believes that the information collected during the survey is reliable, however cannot warrant or guarantee that the information provided is absolutely complete or accurate beyond current environmental consulting standards. Cole Engineering Group Ltd. reserves the right to amend and/or supplement this report in the event that additional information or documentation becomes available.
Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Street, Brantford, Ontario E11-534
Appendix A
Drawings
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:1-1
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
N.T.S.
Site Plan and Building Identification Numbers
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteDesignated Substances Survey
±1A 1B 2
3A
3B-13B-23B-33B-4
3B-5
3B-63C
45A-15A-25B
6A-16A-2 6B-1 6B-2
7891011
1
2
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:1-2
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
N.T.S.
Inaccessible Areas
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteDesignated Substances Survey
±
3B-6
LegendTop Floor Inaccessible
Top Two Floors Inaccessible
Entire Section of Building Inaccessible
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-1
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #1A (Annex)
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
9G
9F
9E 9C9D 9B
9A
7D
7B
7G
7A
7E
7F
7C
#*
L25
#*
L24
#*L23
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-2
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #1B - 4th Floor
Designated Substances Survey
±
LegendACM Sample Location/Number
#*L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
1A 1B
1C
2A 2B 2C
3ABC
L9#*
L7#*
L4#*
L2#*
L1#*
L3#*
L5#*
L6#*
L8#*
L10#*
L11#*
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-3
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #1B - 3rd Floor
Designated Substances Survey
LegendACM Sample Location/Number
#*L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
2D
2E 2F
L12#*
L13
#*
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-4
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #1B - 2nd Floor
Designated Substances Survey
LegendACM Sample Location/Number
#*L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
4A 4B 4C
6ABC
#*L14
#*L15
#*L16
#*L17
#*L18
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-5
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #1B - 1st Floor
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
8F2G
8G
8A
8G
8B
8D 8C
#*L20
#*
L21
#*
L22
8E
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-6
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #2 - 2nd Floor
Designated Substances Survey
LegendACM Sample Location/Number##A
±
85A
85B 85C85D
85E
85G
85F
86A86B
86C
87ABC
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-7
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #2 - 1st Floor
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
11A 11B
12D
11G
11D
12C12B12A 12E
11C11E 11F#*L31
#*L32
#*L33
#*
L34
#*
L35#*
L36
10A10B10C
12G12F
#*L30
#*
L28
#*L29
#*L27#*
L26
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-8
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #3A - 1st Floor
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
14B 14A14C13E
13B 13A
L65
13D
L7113G13F
#*L62#*
L64#*
L63
#*
L68
#*L69
18ABC
14F 14D
13C14E#*
L67#*
#*
#*
L7014G 15ABC16C
16B
16A
#*
L49#*
L52#*
L53#*
L54
#*L55
#*
L51#*
L50#*
L40L41 #*
#*L39
#*L37
#*
L38
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-9
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #3B-1 - Forge A
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
88B
22A
22C
88A
L84
88G88F
#*L85
88D88C#*
22B
88E
#*
L83
#*L87
L86#*
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-10
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #3B-2
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
25ABC
23B 23C
L88
#*L90
24ABC
#*
27ABC
23A
L89#*
#*L92
#*L93
L94#*
#*L95
#*L96
L97#*
#*L98
L99#*
L100#*
L101#*
L102#*
#*L103
#*L91
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-11
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #3B-3 - 1st Floor
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
84A
89F90ABC
L107
84C
#*
83ABC
84B#*
L105
L104#*
L106#*
89G 89E
80ABC 81ABC
82ABC
89D 89C 89B 89A
L123#*
#*
#*L121
L124 L120#*
L122#*
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-12
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #3B-4 - Collapsed Building
Designated Substances Survey##A
±
92A-G
30ABC
31ABC
29ABC
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-13
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #3B-5 - 1st Floor
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
91A
L119
91E
#*
91B
L118#*
#*L11732C
91F
32A
91G
91D 32B 91C
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-14
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #3C - Covered Corridor
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
L57
#*17ABC
#*
L44L56
19FL58 #*
L43
19A19G
19B
19D
19E19C
L42
#*
L46#*
L48
L47
#*#*
#*
L59
#*L61 #*
#*
L60
20ABC
#*
#*
L66
L72
#*
L77
#*
L73#*
L74#*
#*
L75L76
#*21ABC
#*
L78
#*
L80
#*
L81#*
L79#*
L82L45
#*
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-15
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
±
64A
64B
64C 64D
63C
62C 62B 62A
63B 63A
64E
64G
27C 27B 27A
61A
61B
61C
64F
LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #4 - Garage
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
L108#*
L109
#*
L110#*
L111#*
L112#*L113
#*
L114#*
L115#*
L116#*
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-16
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendN.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #5A-1
Designated Substances Survey
#*L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number
±L126#*
#*L130
L127#*
#*L128
#*L129
#*L125
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-17
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendN.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #5A-2
Designated Substances Survey
#*L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number
±
#*L131
#*L133
#*L132
#*L134
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-18
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #5B
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
33C
L136#*
33B
#*L137
#*L138
33A
79G
#*L14034A
#*L139
79F79E
34B
34C
35ABC
#*L141
79C
36ABC#*
L144
L143
#*
L142#*
#*L145
#*L135
79B
79A
79D
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-19
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6A-1
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±38C 38A38BL205#*
40B
40A
40C
#*L210
L209#*
L208#*
L206#*
39C
39A
39B
#*
L207
77C 77B78C
78E
78D
78A77A
78B
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-20
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6A-2 - 3rd Floor
Designated Substances Survey
LegendACM Sample Location/Number
#*L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
58C 58B 58A
#*
L177#*
L178
#*L179
#*
L180
#*
L181
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-21
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6A-2 - 2nd Floor
Designated Substances Survey
LegendACM Sample Location/Number
#*L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
#*L187
#*L188
#*
L189
#*
L191
#*L190
#*L192
#*
L193L194
#*
60A
60C
60B
59C59B59A
L182#*
#*
L185
#*
L184
#*
L183#*
L186
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-22
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6A-2 - 1st Floor
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±#*
L170
#*L171
#*L174
#*L176
#*
L172
#*
L173
#*
L175
76G76F
76E
76D76C 76B
74ABC
75ABC
76A
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-23
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6B-1
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
#*L160
#*L164
#*
L163
56C
56A
56B
57C57B
57A
L162
#*L161
#*
94ABC
95ABC
5ABC
#*L156
53A
53B
53C
#*
L157#*
L159
L158
#*
54D54E
54B
54A54F
54G
54C
#*
L168
55A
55B55C
#*
L165
#*L167
#*
L166
#*
L169
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-24
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6B-2 (Administration) - 2nd Floor
Designated Substances Survey
LegendACM Sample Location/Number
#*L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±#*
L151 49B
49C
49A
L150
#*
48A48B48C
#*L149
41G
47ABC
41F
41E
41D
45ABC
46C
46A
46B
#*L148
L147
#*
41C
41B41A
44B44C
44A
43A
43C
43B
#*L146
42A
42C
42B
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-25
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6B-2 (Administration) - 1st Floor
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
L155
#*
L154
#*
L152
#*
L153
#*
52B
51C 51B51A
50A
50B50C
41H
52A
52C
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-26
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendN.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #8
Designated Substances Survey
#*L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number
±#*
L196#*
L195
#*
L197
L198
#*
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-27
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #9
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
65D
65E
65C65B65A67ABC
68ABC
65G 65F66E
69C69B
66F66G
66A
66B
66C 66D
#*
L200
L199
#*
69A
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-28
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuildingS #10 and #11
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±
L204
#*
L201
#*
L202
#*
#*
L203
37C
37B
37A
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:2-29
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534LegendACM Sample Location/Number
N.T.S.
Sample and Test Locations
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #1 & 2 - Cockshutt Offices & Timekeepers Office
Designated Substances Survey#*
L## Lead Paint Sample Location/Number##A
±#*
L219
#*
L218
#*
L220
#*
L217
L216
#*L221
#*
102C 102B102A101D
101A
101B101C
101G
101F
101E
96E 96C 96A
96B96D98ABC100ABC
97DE
97ABC
99ABC
L215
#*
L214
#*
L213
#*
L212
#*
L211
#*
L212 L212 L212 L212 L212 L212
L218
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-1
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #1A (Annex)
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
? Lining
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application,in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Location of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-2
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #1B - 4th Floor
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductN.T.S.Non-Friable Friable
Designated Substances Survey
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
?
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
? Black Liner
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application, inthe areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-3
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #1B - 3rd Floor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
? Lining
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application, inthe areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
$+
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-4
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #1B - 2nd Floor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
Joint Filler$+
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application, inthe areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-5
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #1B - 1st Floor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
Joint Filler$+
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application, inthe areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-6
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #2 - 2nd Floor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
Joint Filler$+
N o A s b e s t o s - C o n t a i n i n g M a t e r i a l s F o u n dN o A s b e s t o s - C o n t a i n i n g M a t e r i a l s F o u n d( B a s e d o n A c c e s s i b l e A r e a s )( B a s e d o n A c c e s s i b l e A r e a s )
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application, inthe areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-7
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #2 - 1st Floor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
? Lining
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglassapplication, in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-8
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #3A - 1st Floor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
? Lining
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application, inthe areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-9
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #3B-1 - Forge A
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
? Lining
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglassapplication, in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-10
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #3B-2
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
? Lining
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application, inthe areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-11
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #3B-3 - 1st Floor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
Boiler InsulationMastic
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application, inthe areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-12
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #3B-4 - Collapsed Building
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
Joint Filler$+
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application, inthe areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-13
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #3B-5 - 1st Floor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
Joint Filler$+
N o A s b e s t o s - C o n t a i n i n g M a t e r i a l s F o u n dN o A s b e s t o s - C o n t a i n i n g M a t e r i a l s F o u n d( B a s e d o n A c c e s s i b l e A r e a s )( B a s e d o n A c c e s s i b l e A r e a s )
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application, inthe areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-14
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #3C - Covered Corridor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
Joint Filler$+
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application, inthe areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-15
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #4 - Garage
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
? Lining
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application, inthe areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-16
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #5A-1
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
? Lining
N o A s b e s t o s - C o n t a i n i n g M a t e r i a l s F o u n dN o A s b e s t o s - C o n t a i n i n g M a t e r i a l s F o u n d( B a s e d o n A c c e s s i b l e A r e a s )( B a s e d o n A c c e s s i b l e A r e a s )
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application,in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-17
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #5A-2
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
? Lining
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application, inthe areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-18
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #5B
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
? Lining
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application, inthe areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
Asbestos Cement Ceiling
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-19
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6A-1
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
Mastic
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application,in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-20
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6A-2 - 3rd Floor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
? Lining
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application, inthe areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-21
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6A-2 - 2nd Floor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarMastic
Vinyl Floor Tile
? Lining
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglass application,in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-22
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6A-2 - 1st Floor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
? Lining
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglassapplication, in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
Friable
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-23
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6B-1
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
? Lining
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglassapplication, in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
¢
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-24
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6B-2 (Administration) - 2nd Floor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
MortarPlaster
Vinyl Floor Tile
¢ Light Fixture Heat Shield
¢
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglassapplication, in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-25
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6B-2 (Administration) - 2nd Floor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
Mortar
Vinyl Floor Tile
¢ Light Fixture Heat ShieldMastic
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglassapplication, in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-26
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6B-2 (Administration) - 1st Floor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
Mortar
Vinyl Floor Tile
¢ Light Fixture Heat ShieldMastic
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglassapplication, in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-27
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #6B-2 (Administration) - 1st Floor
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
Mortar
Vinyl Floor Tile
¢ Light Fixture Heat ShieldMastic
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglassapplication, in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-28
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #8
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
Mortar
Vinyl Floor Tile
¢ Light Fixture Heat ShieldMastic
N o A s b e s t o s - C o n t a i n i n g M a t e r i a l s F o u n dN o A s b e s t o s - C o n t a i n i n g M a t e r i a l s F o u n d( B a s e d o n A c c e s s i b l e A r e a s )( B a s e d o n A c c e s s i b l e A r e a s )
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglassapplication, in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-29
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding # 9
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Felt
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
Mortar
Vinyl Floor Tile
¢ Light Fixture Heat ShieldMastic
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglassapplication, in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-30
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #10 and #11
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
Mortar
Vinyl Floor Tile
¢ Light Fixture Heat ShieldMastic
N o A s b e s t o s - C o n t a i n i n g M a t e r i a l s F o u n dN o A s b e s t o s - C o n t a i n i n g M a t e r i a l s F o u n d( B a s e d o n A c c e s s i b l e A r e a s )( B a s e d o n A c c e s s i b l e A r e a s )
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglassapplication, in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
±
Locations of Asbestos-Containing Materials
Figure No.
Drawn By:
Checked by:
Date:3-31
BS
JC
Nov 2011
Project No: E11-534
City of Brantford Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield SiteBuilding #1 & 2 - Cockshutt Offices & Timekeepers Office
N.T.S.
Designated Substances Survey
ACMs Legend
Asbestos Cement ProductNon-Friable Friable
Mechanical Systems Insulation(Including Parging Cementon Fittings, Tees, etc.)
Roofing Material
CaulkingDrywall Joint Compound
Mortar
Vinyl Floor Tile
¢ Light Fixture Heat ShieldMastic
Note: All Mechanical Systems Insulation, other than fibreglassapplication, in the areas shown shall be assumed asbestos-containing.
Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Street, Brantford, Ontario E11-534
Appendix B
Sampling and Testing Results Table 1 – Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Table 2 – XRF Spot Test Locations
Table 3 – Light Ballast Inspections for PCBs
Table 4 – Stored Hazardous Materials
Table 5 – ODSs
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐1A Laminated ceiling tile – 12”x12” with small and
large holes
Vacant office area in northeast corner of the 4th floor – Building
1B None Detected
E11‐534‐1B Laminated ceiling tile – 12”x12” with small and
large holes
Vacant office area in northeast corner of the 4th floor – Building
1B None Detected
E11‐534‐1C Laminated ceiling tile – 12”x12” with small and
large holes
Vacant office area in northeast corner of the 4th floor – Building
1B None Detected
E11‐534‐2A** White caulking Window frame on 4th floor –
Building 1B <0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐2B** White caulking Window frame on 4th floor –
Building 1B <0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐2C** White caulking Window frame on 4th floor –
Building 1B <0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐2D** White caulking Window frame on 3rd floor –
Building 1B <0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐2E White caulking Window frame on 3rd floor –
Building 1B None Detected
E11‐534‐2F** White caulking Window frame on 3rd floor –
Building 1B <0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐2G** White caulking Window frame on 2nd floor –
Building 1B <0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐3A Rigid black liner Lining of toilet bowl on 4th floor –
Building 1B 12% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐3B Rigid black liner Lining of toilet bowl on 4th floor –
Building 1B 12% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐3C Rigid black liner Lining of toilet bowl on 4th floor –
Building 1B 18% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐4A Air‐cell mechanical systems insulation
Pipe straight in the large open area on the 2nd floor – Building 1B
25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐4B Air‐cell mechanical systems insulation
Pipe straight in the large open area on the 2nd floor – Building 1B
25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐4C Air‐cell mechanical systems insulation
Pipe straight in the large open area on the 2nd floor – Building 1B
35% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐5A Parging cement
mechanical systems insulation
Pipe fitting on the main floor – Building 6B‐1
30% Chrysotile
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐5B Parging cement
mechanical systems insulation
Pipe fitting on the main floor – Building 6B‐1
30% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐5C Parging cement
mechanical systems insulation
Pipe fitting on the main floor – Building 6B‐1
25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐6A White joint filler Between wall and gypsum
paneling in the east vacant work area on the 2nd floor – Building 1B
5% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐6B White joint filler Between wall and gypsum
paneling in the east vacant work area on the 2nd floor – Building 1B
5% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐6C White joint filler Between wall and gypsum
paneling in the east vacant work area on the 2nd floor – Building 1B
3% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐7A Black roofing material Debris from roof collapse on the
floor of Building 1A None Detected
E11‐534‐7B Black roofing material Debris from roof collapse on the
floor of Building 1A None Detected
E11‐534‐7C Black roofing material Debris from roof collapse on the
floor of Building 1A None Detected
E11‐534‐7D Black roofing material Debris from roof collapse on the
floor of Building 1A None Detected
E11‐534‐7E Black roofing material Debris from roof collapse on the
floor of Building 1A None Detected
E11‐534‐7F Black roofing material Debris from roof collapse on the
floor of Building 1A None Detected
E11‐534‐7G Black roofing material Debris from roof collapse on the
floor of Building 1A None Detected
E11‐534‐8A** Grey brick mortar West exterior wall of Building 1B <0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐8B Grey brick mortar West exterior wall of Building 1B None Detected
E11‐534‐8C Grey Brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 1B None Detected
E11‐534‐8D Grey Brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 1B None Detected
E11‐534‐8E Grey Brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 1B None Detected
E11‐534‐8F Grey brick mortar West exterior wall of Building 1B None Detected
E11‐534‐8G Grey brick mortar West exterior wall of Building 1B None Detected
E11‐534‐9A Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 1A None Detected
E11‐534‐9B Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 1A None Detected
E11‐534‐9C Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 1A None Detected
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐9D Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 1A None Detected
E11‐534‐9E Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 1A None Detected
E11‐534‐9F Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 1A None Detected
E11‐534‐9G Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 1A None Detected
E11‐534‐10A Grey cement board West interior wall of the west vacant area on the 1st floor –
Building 2 20% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐10B Grey cement board West interior wall of the west vacant area on the 1st floor –
Building 2 25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐10C Grey cement board West interior wall of the west vacant area on the 1st floor –
Building 2 20% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐11A Drywall joint compound Wall of vacant office / storage
area in the central section of the 1st floor – Building 2
None Detected
E11‐534‐11B Drywall joint compound Wall of vacant office / storage
area in the central section of the 1st floor – Building 2
None Detected
E11‐534‐11C Drywall joint compound Wall of vacant office / storage
area in the central section of the 1st floor – Building 2
None Detected
E11‐534‐11D Drywall joint compound Wall of vacant office / storage
area in the central section of the 1st floor – Building 2
None Detected
E11‐534‐11E Drywall joint compound Wall of vacant office / storage
area in the central section of the 1st floor – Building 2
None Detected
E11‐534‐11F Drywall joint compound Wall of vacant office / storage
area in the central section of the 1st floor – Building 2
None Detected
E11‐534‐11G Drywall joint compound Wall of vacant office / storage
area in the central section of the 1st floor – Building 2
None Detected
E11‐534‐12A Grey brick mortar East exterior wall of Building 2 None Detected
E11‐534‐12B Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 2 None Detected
E11‐534‐12C Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 2 None Detected
E11‐534‐12D Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 2 None Detected
E11‐534‐12E Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 2 None Detected
E11‐534‐12F Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 2 None Detected
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐12G Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 2 None Detected
E11‐534‐13A Grey brick mortar North exterior wall of Building 3A None Detected
E11‐534‐13B Grey brick mortar North exterior wall of Building 3A None Detected
E11‐534‐13C Grey brick mortar North exterior wall of Building 3A None Detected
E11‐534‐13D Grey brick mortar North exterior wall of Building 3A None Detected
E11‐534‐13E Grey brick mortar North exterior wall of Building 3A None Detected
E11‐534‐13F Grey brick mortar East exterior wall of Building 3A None Detected
E11‐534‐13G Grey brick mortar East exterior wall of Building 3A None Detected
E11‐534‐14A White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 3A None Detected
E11‐534‐14B White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 3A None Detected
E11‐534‐14C** White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 3A <0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐14D White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 3A None Detected
E11‐534‐14E White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 3A 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐14F White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 3A 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐14G White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 3A 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐15A White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 3A <0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐15B White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 3A <0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐15C White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 3A None Detected
E11‐534‐16A White pipe wrap
mechanical systems insulation
Pipe straight on 1st floor – Building 3A
30% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐16B White pipe wrap
mechanical systems insulation
Pipe straight on 1st floor – Building 3A
30% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐16C White pipe wrap
mechanical systems insulation
Pipe straight on 1st floor – Building 3A
40% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐17A Mag‐Block mechanical systems insulation
Pipe straight in washroom at far east end – Building 3C
30% Amosite
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐17B Mag‐Block mechanical systems insulation
Pipe straight in washroom at far east end – Building 3C
30% Amosite
E11‐534‐17C Mag‐Block mechanical systems insulation
Pipe straight in washroom at far east end – Building 3C
20% Amosite
E11‐534‐18A Cement wall board Central wall on the 1st floor –
Building 3A 20% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐18B Cement wall board Central wall on the 1st floor –
Building 3A 20% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐18C Cement wall board Central wall on the 1st floor –
Building 3A 15% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐19A Black roofing materials Debris from roof collapse in the
far east end – Building 3C 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐19B Black roofing materials Debris from roof collapse in the
far east end– Building 3C 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐19C Black roofing materials Debris from roof collapse in the
far east end – Building 3C 4% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐19D Black roofing materials Debris from roof collapse in the
far east end – Building 3C 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐19E Black roofing materials Debris from roof collapse in the
far east end – Building 3C 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐19F Black roofing materials Debris from roof collapse in the
far east end – Building 3C 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐19G Black roofing materials Debris from roof collapse in the far
east end – Building 3C None Detected
E11‐534‐20A Anti‐Sweat mechanical systems insulation
Pipe straight in central stores office – Building 3C
None Detected
E11‐534‐20B Anti‐Sweat mechanical systems insulation
Pipe straight in central stores office – Building 3C
None Detected
E11‐534‐20C Anti‐Sweat mechanical systems insulation
Pipe straight in central stores office – Building 3C
None Detected
E11‐534‐21A White flexible joint
material On door at the far west end –
Building 3C None Detected
E11‐534‐21B White flexible joint
material On door at the far west end –
Building 3C None Detected
E11‐534‐21C White flexible joint
material On door at the far west end –
Building 3C None Detected
E11‐534‐22A Air‐Cell mechanical systems insulation
Pipe straight in Building 3B‐1 30% Chrysotile
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐22B Air‐Cell mechanical systems insulation
Pipe straight in Building 3B‐1 30% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐22C Air‐Cell mechanical systems insulation
Pipe straight in Building 3B‐1 35% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐23A** White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 3B‐2 0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐23B** White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 3B‐2 <0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐23C White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 3B‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐24A Suspended ceiling tile – 2’x2’ with pinholes and
holes
Former office area in the central section of the 1st floor – Building
3B‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐24B Suspended ceiling tile – 2’x2’ with pinholes and
holes
Former office area in the central section of the 1st floor – Building
3B‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐24C Suspended ceiling tile – 2’x2’ with pinholes and
holes
Former office area in the central section of the 1st floor – Building
3B‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐25A Suspended ceiling tile –
2’x4’ with a textured finish
Former office area in the central section of the 1st floor – Building
3B‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐25B Suspended ceiling tile –
2’x4’ with a textured finish
Former office area in the central section of the 1st floor – Building
3B‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐25C Suspended ceiling tile –
2’x4’ with a textured finish
Former office area in the central section of the 1st floor – Building
3B‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐26A White caulking Window of Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐26B White caulking Window of Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐26C White caulking Window of Building 4 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐27A Drywall joint compound Wall in the west vacant area of the
1st floor – Building 3B‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐27B Drywall joint compound Wall in the west vacant area of the
1st floor – Building 3B‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐27C Drywall joint compound Wall in the west vacant area of the
1st floor – Building 3B‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐28A** White Caulking Building 3B‐2 <0.25% Chrysotile
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐28B** White Caulking Building 3B‐2 <0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐28C White Caulking Building 3B‐2 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐29A Black Shingles Debris from roof collapse –
Building 3B‐4 None Detected
E11‐534‐29B Black Shingles Debris from roof collapse –
Building 3B‐4 None Detected
E11‐534‐29C Black Shingles Debris from roof collapse –
Building 3B‐4 None Detected
E11‐534‐30A Brown Shingles Debris from roof collapse –
Building 3B‐4 None Detected
E11‐534‐30B Brown Shingles Debris from roof collapse –
Building 3B‐4 None Detected
E11‐534‐30C Brown Shingles Debris from roof collapse –
Building 3B‐4 None Detected
E11‐534‐31A Black roofing felt Debris from roof collapse –
Building 3B‐4 None Detected
E11‐534‐31B Black roofing felt Debris from roof collapse –
Building 3B‐4 None Detected
E11‐534‐31C Black roofing felt Debris from roof collapse –
Building 3B‐4 None Detected
E11‐534‐32A Drywall joint compound Wall of vacant office on 1st floor –
Building 3B‐5 None Detected
E11‐534‐32B Drywall joint compound Wall of vacant office on 1st floor –
Building 3B‐5 None Detected
E11‐534‐32C Drywall joint compound Wall of vacant office on 1st floor –
Building 3B‐5 None Detected
E11‐534‐33A Drywall joint compound Ceiling of washroom on 1st floor –
Building 5B 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐33B Drywall joint compound Ceiling of washroom on 1st floor –
Building 5B 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐33C Drywall joint compound Ceiling of washroom on 1st floor –
Building 5B 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐34A Laminated ceiling tile –
16”x16” green Ceiling of vacant work area on 1st
floor – Building 5B None Detected
E11‐534‐34B Laminated ceiling tile –
16”x16” green Ceiling of vacant work area on 1st
floor – Building 5B None Detected
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐34C Laminated ceiling tile –
16”x16” green Ceiling of vacant work area on 1st
floor – Building 5B None Detected
E11‐534‐35A Brown caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 5B 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐35B Brown caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 5B 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐35C Brown caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 5B 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐36A Vinyl sheet flooring – false 12”x12” grey and brown
ceramic
Vacant office area in the northwest section of the 1st floor –
Building 5B None Detected
E11‐534‐36B Vinyl sheet flooring – false 12”x12” grey and brown
ceramic
Vacant office area in the northwest section of the 1st floor –
Building 5B None Detected
E11‐534‐36C Vinyl sheet flooring – false 12”x12” grey and brown
ceramic
Vacant office area in the northwest section of the 1st floor –
Building 5B None Detected
E11‐534‐37A Green shingles Roof of Building 11 None Detected
E11‐534‐37B Green shingles Roof of Building 11 None Detected
E11‐534‐37C Green shingles Roof of Building 11 None Detected
E11‐534‐38A Plaster Support columns on northeast wall of 1st floor – Building 12A
None Detected
E11‐534‐38B Plaster Support columns on northeast wall of 1st floor – Building 12A
None Detected
E11‐534‐38C Plaster Support columns on northeast wall of 1st floor – Building 12A
None Detected
Vinyl floor tiles – 12”x12” grey
Floor of southwest vestibule on 1st floor – Building 6A‐1
3% Chrysotile E11‐534‐39A
Black Mastic Floor of southwest vestibule on
1st floor – Building 6A‐1 5% Chrysotile
Vinyl floor tiles – 12”x12” grey
Floor of southwest vestibule on 1st floor – Building 6A‐1
4% Chrysotile E11‐534‐39B
Black Mastic Floor of southwest vestibule on
1st floor – Building 6A‐1 5% Chrysotile
Vinyl floor tiles – 12”x12” grey
Floor of southwest vestibule on 1st floor – Building 6A‐1
3% Chrysotile E11‐534‐39C
Black Mastic Floor of southwest vestibule on
1st floor – Building 6A‐1 4% Chrysotile
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
Vinyl floor tile – 12”x12” brown, light brown, rust
and white
Floor of 1st floor shower / locker area – Building 6A‐1
4% Chrysotile E11‐534‐40A
Black Mastic Floor of 1st floor shower / locker
area – Building 6A‐1 3% Chrysotile
Vinyl floor tile – 12”x12” brown, light brown, rust
and white
Floor of 1st floor shower / locker area – Building 6A‐1
3% Chrysotile E11‐534‐40B
Black Mastic Floor of 1st floor shower / locker
area – Building 6A‐1 2% Chrysotile
Vinyl floor tile – 12”x12” brown, light brown, rust
and white
Floor of 1st floor shower / locker area – Building 6A‐1
3% Chrysotile E11‐534‐40C
Black Mastic Floor of 1st floor shower / locker
area – Building 6A‐1 4% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐41A Drywall joint compound Ceiling of southeast stairwell on
2nd floor – Building 6B‐2 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐41B Drywall joint compound Wall of 2nd floor kitchen –
Building 6B‐2 3% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐41C Drywall joint compound Wall of 2nd floor kitchen –
Building 6B‐2 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐41D Drywall joint compound Wall of 2nd floor office area –
Building 6B‐2 4% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐41E Drywall joint compound Wall of 2nd floor office area –
Building 6B‐2 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐41F Drywall joint compound Wall of 2nd floor office area –
Building 6B‐2 3% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐41G Drywall joint compound Wall of 2nd floor office area –
Building 6B‐2 4% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐41H Drywall joint compound 1st floor stairwell ceiling –
Building 6B‐2 3% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐42A Suspended ceiling tile –
2’x4’ holes and long sharp fissures
Ceiling of 2nd floor kitchen – Building 6B‐2
None Detected
E11‐534‐42B Suspended ceiling tile –
2’x4’ holes and long sharp fissures
Ceiling of 2nd floor kitchen – Building 6B‐2
None Detected
E11‐534‐42C Suspended ceiling tile –
2’x4’ holes and long sharp fissures
Ceiling of 2nd floor kitchen – Building 6B‐2
None Detected
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐43A Vinyl floor tile – 12”x12” beige with thin brown
streaks
Floor of 2nd floor kitchen – Building 6B‐2
3% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐43B Vinyl floor tile – 12”x12” beige with thin brown
streaks
Floor of 2nd floor kitchen – Building 6B‐2
4% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐43C Vinyl floor tile – 12”x12” beige with thin brown
streaks
Floor of 2nd floor kitchen – Building 6B‐2
5% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐44A Black mastic Below the vinyl floor tiles in the 2nd floor kitchen – Building 6B‐2
5% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐44B Black mastic Below the vinyl floor tiles in the 2nd floor kitchen – Building 6B‐2
5% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐44C Black mastic Below the vinyl floor tiles in the 2nd floor kitchen – Building 6B‐2
5% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐45A White heat shield Light fixture in the 2nd floor kitchen – Building 6B‐2
25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐45B White heat shield Light fixture in the 2nd floor kitchen – Building 6B‐2
30% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐45C White heat shield Light fixture in the 2nd floor kitchen – Building 6B‐2
25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐46A Vinyl floor tile – 12”x12” white with black streaks
Under carpet in 2nd floor office area – Building 6B‐2
3% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐46B Vinyl floor tile – 12”x12” white with black streaks
Under carpet in 2nd floor office area – Building 6B‐2
3% Chrysotile
Vinyl floor tile – 12”x12” white with black streaks
Under carpet in 2nd floor office area – Building 6B‐2
4% Chrysotile E11‐534‐46C
Black mastic Under carpet in 2nd floor office
area – Building 6B‐2 3% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐47A White tape On duct joint above the 2nd floor office space ceiling – Building 6B‐2
None Detected
E11‐534‐47B White tape On duct joint above the 2nd floor office space ceiling – Building 6B‐2
None Detected
E11‐534‐47C White tape On duct joint above the 2nd floor office space ceiling – Building 6B‐2
None Detected
E11‐534‐48A Vinyl floor tile – 12”x12” blue with grey and white
streaks
Floor of 2nd floor men’s washroom – Building 6B‐2
2% Chrysotile
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐48B Vinyl floor tile – 12”x12” blue with grey and white
streaks
Floor of 2nd floor men’s washroom – Building 6B‐2
2% Chrysotile
Vinyl floor tile – 12”x12” blue with grey and white
streaks
Floor of 2nd floor men’s washroom – Building 6B‐2
2% Chrysotile E11‐534‐48C
Black mastic Floor of 2nd floor men’s
washroom – Building 6B‐2 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐49A Vinyl floor tile – 12”x12” beige with fine brown
streaks
Floor of 2nd floor women’s washroom – Building 6B‐2
2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐49B Vinyl floor tile – 12”x12” beige with fine brown
streaks
Floor of 2nd floor women’s washroom – Building 6B‐2
3% Chrysotile
Vinyl floor tile – 12”x12” beige with fine brown
streaks
Floor of 2nd floor women’s washroom – Building 6B‐2
3% Chrysotile E11‐534‐49C
Black mastic Floor of 2nd floor women’s washroom – Building 6B‐2
2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐50A Suspended ceiling tile – 2’x2’ pinholes and long
broad fissures
Ceiling of 1st floor office area – Building 6B‐2
None Detected
E11‐534‐50B Suspended ceiling tile – 2’x2’ pinholes and long
broad fissures
Ceiling of 1st floor office area – Building 6B‐2
None Detected
E11‐534‐50C Suspended ceiling tile – 2’x2’ pinholes and long
broad fissures
Ceiling of 1st floor office area – Building 6B‐2
None Detected
E11‐534‐51A Suspended ceiling tile –
2’x2’ pinholes and fissures Ceiling of 1st floor office area –
Building 6B‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐51B Suspended ceiling tile –
2’x2’ pinholes and fissures Ceiling of 1st floor office area –
Building 6B‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐51C Suspended ceiling tile –
2’x2’ pinholes and fissures Ceiling of 1st floor office area –
Building 6B‐2 None Detected
Vinyl floor tile – 9”x9” grey with brown streaks
Floor of 1st floor janitor’s closet – Building 6B‐2
3% Chrysotile E11‐534‐52A
Black mastic Floor of 1st floor janitor’s closet –
Building 6B‐2 None Detected
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
Vinyl floor tile – 9”x9” grey with brown streaks
Floor of 1st floor janitor’s closet – Building 6B‐2
2% Chrysotile E11‐534‐52B
Black mastic Floor of 1st floor janitor’s closet –
Building 6B‐2 None Detected
Vinyl floor tile – 9”x9” grey with brown streaks
Floor of 1st floor janitor’s closet – Building 6B‐2
2% Chrysotile E11‐534‐52C
Black mastic Floor of 1st floor janitor’s closet –
Building 6B‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐53A Grey textured material Wall of southeast 1st floor bay area
– Building 6B‐1 None Detected
E11‐534‐53B Grey textured material Wall of southeast 1st floor bay area
– Building 6B‐1 None Detected
E11‐534‐53C Grey textured material Wall of southeast 1st floor bay area
– Building 6B‐1 None Detected
E11‐534‐54A Black roofing materials Debris from roof collapse in
central south bay area on 1st floor – Building 6B‐1
None Detected
E11‐534‐54B Black roofing materials Debris from roof collapse in
central south bay area on 1st floor – Building 6B‐1
None Detected
E11‐534‐54C Black roofing materials Debris from roof collapse in
central south bay area on 1st floor – Building 6B‐1
None Detected
E11‐534‐54D Black roofing materials Debris from roof collapse in
central south bay area on 1st floor – Building 6B‐1
None Detected
E11‐534‐54E Black roofing materials Debris from roof collapse in
central south bay area on 1st floor – Building 6B‐1
None Detected
E11‐534‐54F Black roofing materials Debris from roof collapse in
central south bay area on 1st floor – Building 6B‐1
None Detected
E11‐534‐54G Black roofing materials Debris from roof collapse in
central south bay area on 1st floor – Building 6B‐1
None Detected
E11‐534‐55A Drywall joint compound 1st floor wall in central section of
Building 6B‐1 None Detected
E11‐534‐55B Drywall joint compound 1st floor wall in central section of
Building 6B‐1 None Detected
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐55C Drywall joint compound 1st floor wall in central section of
Building 6B‐1 None Detected
E11‐534‐56A Suspended ceiling tile –
2’x2’ pinholes and textured fissures
1st floor office adjacent to shipping / receiving – Building 6B‐1
None Detected
E11‐534‐56B Suspended ceiling tile –
2’x2’ pinholes and textured fissures
1st floor office adjacent to shipping / receiving – Building 6B‐1
None Detected
E11‐534‐56C Suspended ceiling tile –
2’x2’ pinholes and textured fissures
1st floor office adjacent to shipping / receiving – Building 6B‐1
None Detected
E11‐534‐57A White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 6B‐1 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐57B White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 6B‐1 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐57C White caulking Window frame on 1st floor –
Building 6B‐1 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐58A Cement wall board Wall of 3rd floor storage / corridor
– Building 6B‐1 15% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐58B Cement wall board Wall of 3rd floor storage / corridor
– Building 6B‐1 20% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐58C Cement wall board Wall of 3rd floor storage / corridor
– Building 6B‐1 20% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐59A Grey sealant North wall of 2nd floor storage /
corridor – Building 6A‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐59B Grey sealant North wall of 2nd floor storage /
corridor – Building 6A‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐59C Grey sealant North wall of 2nd floor storage /
corridor – Building 6A‐2 None Detected
Vinyl floor tile – 9”x9” orange
Floor of 2nd floor training room – Building 6A‐2
6% Chrysotile E11‐534‐60A
Black mastic Floor of 2nd floor training room –
Building 6A‐2 3% Chrysotile
Vinyl floor tile – 9”x9” orange
Floor of 2nd floor training room – Building 6A‐2
5% Chrysotile E11‐534‐60B
Black mastic Floor of 2nd floor training room –
Building 6A‐2 4% Chrysotile
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
Vinyl floor tile – 9”x9” orange
Floor of 2nd floor training room – Building 6A‐2
4% Chrysotile E11‐534‐60C
Black mastic Floor of 2nd floor training room –
Building 6A‐2 4% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐61A Drywall joint compound Wall in Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐61B Drywall joint compound Wall in Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐61C Drywall joint compound Wall in Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐62A Black shingles Roof of Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐62B Black shingles Roof of Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐62C Black shingles Roof of Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐63A Black felt Roof of Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐63B Black felt Roof of Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐63C Black felt Roof of Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐64A Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐64B Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐64C Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐64D Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐64E Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐64F Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐64G Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 4 None Detected
E11‐534‐65A Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 9 (east) None Detected
E11‐534‐65B Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 9 (east) None Detected
E11‐534‐65C Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 9 (east) None Detected
E11‐534‐65D Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 9 (east) None Detected
E11‐534‐65E Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 9 (east) None Detected
E11‐534‐65F Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 9 (east) None Detected
E11‐534‐65G Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 9 (east) None Detected
E11‐534‐66A Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 9 (west) None Detected
E11‐534‐66B Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 9 (west) None Detected
E11‐534‐66C Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 9 (west) None Detected
E11‐534‐66D Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 9 (west) None Detected
E11‐534‐66E Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 9 (west) None Detected
E11‐534‐66F Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 9 (west) None Detected
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐66G Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 9 (west) None Detected
E11‐534‐67A Grey caulking Gap between the east and west
portions of Building 9 10% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐67B Grey caulking Gap between the east and west
portions of Building 9 10% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐67C Grey caulking Gap between the east and west
portions of Building 9 15% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐68A Black caulking Northeast window of Building 9 None Detected
E11‐534‐68B Black caulking Northeast window of Building 9 None Detected
E11‐534‐68C Black caulking Northeast window of Building 9 None Detected
E11‐534‐69A Black roofing felt Roof of Building 9 3% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐69B Black roofing felt Roof of Building 9 4% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐69C Black roofing felt Roof of Building 9 2% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐70A Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 8 None Detected
E11‐534‐70B Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 8 None Detected
E11‐534‐70C Grey mortar Exterior wall of Building 8 None Detected
E11‐534‐71A Grey mortar Exterior wall of Time Keepers
Building None Detected
E11‐534‐71B Grey mortar Exterior wall of Time Keepers
Building None Detected
E11‐534‐71C Grey mortar Exterior wall of Time Keepers
Building None Detected
E11‐534‐72A Black shingles Roof of Time Keepers Building None Detected
E11‐534‐72B Black shingles Roof of Time Keepers Building None Detected
E11‐534‐72C Black shingles Roof of Time Keepers Building None Detected
E11‐534‐73A Grey mortar Exterior wall of 67 Mohawk None Detected
E11‐534‐73B Grey mortar Exterior wall of 67 Mohawk None Detected
E11‐534‐73C Grey mortar Exterior wall of 67 Mohawk None Detected
E11‐534‐73D Grey mortar Exterior wall of 67 Mohawk None Detected
E11‐534‐73E Grey mortar Exterior wall of 67 Mohawk None Detected
E11‐534‐73F Grey mortar Exterior wall of 67 Mohawk None Detected
E11‐534‐73G Grey mortar Exterior wall of 67 Mohawk None Detected
E11‐534‐74A Cement board Adjacent to the south wall of
Building 6A‐2 20% Chrysotile
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐74B Cement board Adjacent to the south wall of
Building 6A‐2 Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐74C Cement board Adjacent to the south wall of
Building 6A‐2 Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐75A White mechanical systems
insulation
Pipe straight in outbuilding adjacent to the south wall of
Building 6A‐2 15% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐75B White mechanical systems
insulation
Pipe straight in outbuilding adjacent to the south wall of
Building 6A‐2
Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐75C White mechanical systems
insulation
Pipe straight in outbuilding adjacent to the south wall of
Building 6A‐2
Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐76A Grey brick mortar South wall of Building 6A‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐76B Grey brick mortar South wall of Building 6A‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐76C Grey brick mortar South wall of Building 6A‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐76D Grey brick mortar South wall of Building 6A‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐76E Grey brick mortar South wall of Building 6A‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐76F Grey brick mortar South wall of Building 6A‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐76G Grey brick mortar South wall of Building 6A‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐77A** White caulking South windows of Building 6A‐1 <0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐77B** White caulking South windows of Building 6A‐1 0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐77C** White caulking South windows of Building 6A‐1 0.50% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐78A Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 6A‐
1 None Detected
E11‐534‐78B Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 6A‐
1 None Detected
E11‐534‐78C Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 6A‐
1 None Detected
E11‐534‐78D Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 6A‐
1 None Detected
E11‐534‐78E Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 6A‐
1 None Detected
E11‐534‐79A Grey brick mortar West exterior wall of Building 5B None Detected
E11‐534‐79B Grey brick mortar West exterior wall of Building 5B None Detected
E11‐534‐79C Grey brick mortar North exterior wall of Building 5B None Detected
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐79D Grey brick mortar North exterior wall of Building 5B None Detected
E11‐534‐79E Grey brick mortar North exterior wall of Building 5B None Detected
E11‐534‐79F Grey brick mortar North exterior wall of Building 5B None Detected
E11‐534‐79G Grey brick mortar North exterior wall of Building 5B None Detected
E11‐534‐80A Parging cement Tank on boiler in Building 3B‐3 40% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐80B Parging cement Tank on boiler in Building 3B‐3 Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐80C Parging cement Tank on boiler in Building 3B‐3 Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐81A Gasket On boiler door in Building 3B‐3 None Detected
E11‐534‐81B Gasket On boiler door in Building 3B‐3 None Detected
E11‐534‐81C Gasket On boiler door in Building 3B‐3 None Detected
E11‐534‐82A Beige insulation In boiler in Building 3B‐3 4% Amosite
E11‐534‐82B Beige insulation In boiler in Building 3B‐3 Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐82C Beige insulation In boiler in Building 3B‐3 Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐83A White mechanical systems
insulation On tank in Building 3B‐3
mechanical room 45% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐83B White mechanical systems
insulation On tank in Building 3B‐3
mechanical room Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐83C White mechanical systems
insulation On tank in Building 3B‐3
mechanical room Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐84A Drywall joint compound Former office area wall in Building
3B‐4 None Detected
E11‐534‐84B Drywall joint compound Former office area wall in Building
3B‐4 None Detected
E11‐534‐84C Drywall joint compound Former office area wall in Building
3B‐4 None Detected
E11‐534‐85A Drywall joint compound Wall of 2nd floor apartment in
Building 2 None Detected
E11‐534‐85B Drywall joint compound Wall of 2nd floor apartment in
Building 2 None Detected
E11‐534‐85C Drywall joint compound Wall of 2nd floor apartment in
Building 2 None Detected
E11‐534‐85D Drywall joint compound Wall of 2nd floor apartment in
Building 2 None Detected
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐85E Drywall joint compound Wall of 2nd floor apartment in
Building 2 None Detected
E11‐534‐85F Drywall joint compound Wall of 2nd floor apartment in
Building 2 None Detected
E11‐534‐85G Drywall joint compound Wall of 2nd floor apartment in
Building 2 None Detected
E11‐534‐86A Vinyl floor tile – 9”x9”
beige/brown Floor of 2nd floor apartment in
Building 2 None Detected
E11‐534‐86B Vinyl floor tile – 9”x9”
beige/brown Floor of 2nd floor apartment in
Building 2 None Detected
E11‐534‐86C Vinyl floor tile – 9”x9”
beige/brown Floor of 2nd floor apartment in
Building 2 None Detected
E11‐534‐87A Suspended ceiling tile ‐ 2’x4’ holes and fissures
Floor of 2nd floor apartment in Building 2
None Detected
E11‐534‐87B Suspended ceiling tile ‐ 2’x4’ holes and fissures
Floor of 2nd floor apartment in Building 2
None Detected
E11‐534‐87C Suspended ceiling tile ‐ 2’x4’ holes and fissures
Floor of 2nd floor apartment in Building 2
None Detected
E11‐534‐88A Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 5A‐
1 None Detected
E11‐534‐88B Grey brick mortar East exterior wall of Building 5A‐1 None Detected
E11‐534‐88C Grey brick mortar East exterior wall of Building 5A‐1 None Detected
E11‐534‐88D Grey brick mortar East exterior wall of Building 5A‐1 None Detected
E11‐534‐88E Grey brick mortar East exterior wall of Building 5A‐1 None Detected
E11‐534‐88F Grey brick mortar North exterior wall of Building 5A‐
1 None Detected
E11‐534‐88G Grey brick mortar North exterior wall of Building 5A‐
1 None Detected
E11‐534‐89A Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 3B‐
3 None Detected
E11‐534‐89B Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 3B‐
3 None Detected
E11‐534‐89C Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 3B‐
3 None Detected
E11‐534‐89D Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 3B‐
3 None Detected
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐89E Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 3B‐
3 None Detected
E11‐534‐89F Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 3B‐
3 None Detected
E11‐534‐89G Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 3B‐
3 None Detected
E11‐534‐90A Green caulking Window on south wall of Building
3B‐3 None Detected
E11‐534‐90B** Green caulking Window on south wall of Building
3B‐3 <0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐90C Green caulking Window on south wall of Building
3B‐3 None Detected
E11‐534‐91A Grey brick mortar East exterior wall of Building 3B‐5 None Detected
E11‐534‐91B Grey brick mortar East exterior wall of Building 3B‐5 None Detected
E11‐534‐91C Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 3B‐
5 None Detected
E11‐534‐91D Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 3B‐
5 None Detected
E11‐534‐91E Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 3B‐
5 None Detected
E11‐534‐91F Grey brick mortar South exterior wall of Building 3B‐
5 None Detected
E11‐534‐91G Grey brick mortar North exterior wall of Building 3B‐
5 None Detected
E11‐534‐92A Grey brick mortar Exterior debris of Building 3B‐4 None Detected
E11‐534‐92B Grey brick mortar Exterior debris of Building 3B None Detected
E11‐534‐92C Grey brick mortar Exterior debris of Building 3B None Detected
E11‐534‐92D Grey brick mortar Exterior debris of Building 3B None Detected
E11‐534‐92E Grey brick mortar Exterior debris of Building 3B None Detected
E11‐534‐92F Grey brick mortar Exterior debris of Building 3B None Detected
E11‐534‐92G Grey brick mortar Exterior debris of Building 3B None Detected
E11‐534‐93A White sealant Between gaps in exterior brick
work of Building 6B‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐93B White sealant Between gaps in exterior brick
work of Building 6B‐2 None Detected
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
E11‐534‐93C White sealant Between gaps in exterior brick
work of Building 6B‐2 None Detected
E11‐534‐94A Dark brown shingles Northeast exterior wall of Building
6B‐1 None Detected
E11‐534‐94B Dark brown shingles Northeast exterior wall of Building
6B‐1 None Detected
E11‐534‐94C Dark brown shingles Northeast exterior wall of Building
6B‐1 None Detected
E11‐534‐95A Light brown shingles Northeast exterior wall of Building
6B‐1 None Detected
E11‐534‐95B Light brown shingles Northeast exterior wall of Building
6B‐1 None Detected
E11‐534‐95C Light brown shingles Northeast exterior wall of Building
6B‐1 None Detected
E11‐534‐96A Texture coat Ceiling of Time Keepers Building None Detected
E11‐534‐96B Texture coat Ceiling of Time Keepers Building None Detected
E11‐534‐96C Texture coat Ceiling of Time Keepers Building None Detected
E11‐534‐96D** Texture coat Ceiling of Time Keepers Building <0.25% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐96E Texture coat Ceiling of Time Keepers Building None Detected
E11‐534‐97A Plaster Wall of Time Keepers Building None Detected
E11‐534‐97B Plaster Wall of Time Keepers Building None Detected
E11‐534‐97C Plaster Wall of Time Keepers Building None Detected
E11‐534‐97D Plaster Wall of Time Keepers Building None Detected
E11‐534‐97E Plaster Wall of Time Keepers Building None Detected
Vinyl floor tile – 9”x9” green
Floor of Time Keepers Building 8% Chrysotile E11‐534‐98A
Black mastic Floor of Time Keepers Building 6% Chrysotile
Vinyl floor tile – 9”x9” green
Floor of Time Keepers Building Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐98B
Black mastic Floor of Time Keepers Building Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
Vinyl floor tile – 9”x9” green
Floor of Time Keepers Building Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐98C
Black mastic Floor of Time Keepers Building Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 1 (Continued) Summary Analysis of Bulk Samples for Asbestos
Analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) with Dispersion Staining Collected Between October 21 and November 17, 2011
Sample Number
Sample / Material Description
Sample Location Type and Percent of
Asbestos
Vinyl floor tile – 9”x9” white
Floor of Time Keepers Building 3% Chrysotile E11‐534‐99A
Black mastic Floor of Time Keepers Building 6% Chrysotile
Vinyl floor tile – 9”x9” white
Floor of Time Keepers Building Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐99B
Black mastic Floor of Time Keepers Building Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
Vinyl floor tile – 9”x9” white
Floor of Time Keepers Building Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐99C
Black mastic Floor of Time Keepers Building Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐100A Black mastic Floor of Time Keepers Building 15% Chrysotile
E11‐534‐100B Black mastic Floor of Time Keepers Building Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐100C Black mastic Floor of Time Keepers Building Not Analyzed (Stop Positive)
E11‐534‐101A Plaster Wall of Cockshutt Building None Detected
E11‐534‐101B Plaster Wall of Cockshutt Building None Detected
E11‐534‐101C Plaster Wall of Cockshutt Building None Detected
E11‐534‐101D Plaster Wall of Cockshutt Building None Detected
E11‐534‐101E Plaster Wall of Cockshutt Building None Detected
E11‐534‐101F Plaster Wall of Cockshutt Building None Detected
E11‐534‐101G Plaster Wall of Cockshutt Building None Detected
E11‐534‐102A Suspended ceiling tile – 2”x4” holes and large
fissures Ceiling of Cockshutt Building None Detected
E11‐534‐102B Suspended ceiling tile – 2”x4” holes and large
fissures Ceiling of Cockshutt Building None Detected
E11‐534‐102C Suspended ceiling tile – 2”x4” holes and large
fissures Ceiling of Cockshutt Building None Detected
** Indicates samples analyzed using 400 Point Count Procedure
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 2 Summary of XRF Spot Test Analysis for Lead in Paint
Sampling Performed on November 16, 2011
Sample Number
Paint Colour Sample Location Lead
Concentration mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L1 Green West wall of 4th floor office – Building 1B 0.5 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L2 White North wall of 4th floor office – Building 1B 0.05 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L3 Green South Wall of 4th floor office – Building 1B 0.5 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L4 Beige Central pillar on 4th floor – Building 1B 0.08 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L5 Yellow South open area wall on 4th floor – Building 1B 2.0 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L6 Green South open area wall on 4th floor – Building 1B 0.15 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L7 Beige Central pillar on 4th floor – Building 1B 0.10 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L8 Yellow South open area wall on 4th floor – Building 1B 0.8 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L9 White North open area wall on 4th floor ‐ Building 1B 0.07 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L10 White East wood wall on 4th floor – Building 1B 0.07 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L11 Green 4th floor bathroom door – Building 1B 0.5 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L12 White Central pillar on 3rd floor – Building 1B 0.16 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L13 Green Southeast open area wall on 3rd floor – Building 1B 0.30 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L14 Red West wall of west 2nd floor offices – Building 1B 0.30 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L15 Red South wall of west 2nd floor offices – Building 1B 0.25 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L16 White East wall of west 2nd floor offices – Building 1B None
E11‐534‐L17 Brown Central pillar on 2nd floor – Building 1B 0.15 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L18 Brown Central pillar on 2nd floor – Building 1B 0.29 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L19 Green North wall of 2nd floor washroom – Building 1B 0.40 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L20 White North open area wall on 1st floor – Building 1B 0.26 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L21 White South open area wall on 1st floor – Building 1B 0.5 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L22 Green Southwest bay doors on 1st floor – Building 1B 0.07 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L23 Beige South open area wall on 1st floor – Building 1A 0.14 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L24 Yellow Central pillar on 1st floor – Building 1A 1.4 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L25 White North open area wall on 1st floor – Building 1A 0.14 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L26 Red Far east door on 1st floor – Building 2 0.08 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L27 White Support column 21 in east open area on 1st floor –
Building 2 0.30 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L28 White East of east stairwell on 1st floor – Building 2 0.01 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L29 Green Exit door #5 on 1st floor – Building 2 0.18 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L30 White West wall of 1st floor open area – Building 2 None
E11‐534‐L31 Red Central fire door on 1st floor – Building 2 0.15 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L32 Yellow Central support column on 1st floor – Building 2 5.4 mg/cm2
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 2 (Continued) Summary of XRF Spot Test Analysis for Lead in Paint
Sampling Performed on November 16, 2011
Sample Number
Paint Colour Sample Location Lead
Concentration mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L33 White South open area wall on 1st floor – Building 2 None
E11‐534‐L34 Beige North open area wall on 1st floor – Building 2 1.5 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L35 Purple Southwest 1st floor entryway – Building 2 0.12 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L36 Yellow Southwest 1st floor entryway – Building 2 3.6 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L37 White West wall of eastern open area – Building 3A 0.03 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L38 White South wall of eastern open area – Building 3A 0.17 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L39 Green North wall of eastern open area – Building 3A 0.07 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L40 Black Far east exit door – Building 3A 0.25 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L41 Black Far east exit door – Building 3A 0.6 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L42 Beige South washroom wall – Building 3C (Corridor) 3.3 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L43 Beige Washroom door – Building 3C (Corridor) None
E11‐534‐L44 Green East wall – Building 3C (Corridor) 0.19 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L45 Yellow Eastern support column – Building 3C (Corridor) 7.8 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L46 White Southeastern wall – Building 3C (Corridor) 0.06 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L47 Yellow Northeastern wall – Building 3C (Corridor) 0.4 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L48 Green Southeastern wall – Building 3C (Corridor) 0.07 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L49 Lime Southeastern wall – Building 3A 0.08 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L50 Lime Northeastern wall – Building 3A 1.6 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L51 White Northeastern wall – Building 3A 0.18 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L52 Yellow Southeastern wall – Building 3A 8.1 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L53 White Southeastern wall – Building 3A 0.30 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L54 Red Southeastern wall – Building 3A 0.10 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L55 White Central wall – Building 3A 0.5 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L56 Green South office area wall – Building 3C (Corridor) 1.7 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L57 Light blue South wall of Central Stores – Building 3C
(Corridor) 0.21 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L58 Yellow South wall of Central Stores – Building 3C
(Corridor) 6.9 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L59 Red South wall of Central Stores – Building 3C
(Corridor) 0.30 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L60 White South wall of central section – Building 3C (Corridor) None
E11‐534‐L61 White Central wall of central section – Building 3C
(Corridor) None
E11‐534‐L62 White Central wall – Building 3A 11.8 mg/cm2
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 2 (Continued) Summary of XRF Spot Test Analysis for Lead in Paint
Sampling Performed on November 16, 2011
Sample Number
Paint Colour Sample Location Lead
Concentration mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L63 Yellow Central support column – Building 3A 2.1 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L64 Green Central support column – Building 3A 2.9 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L65 White South wall of central open area – Building 3A 0.03 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L66 White South wall of central section – Building 3C
(Corridor) 0.01 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L67 White Central wall ‐ Building 3A 0.03 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L68 Lime North wall of central section – Building 3A 1.6 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L69 Lime South wall of central section – Building 3A None
E11‐534‐L70 Yellow North entryway of central section – Building 3A 12.6 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L71 Lime Central wall – Building 3A 0.6 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L72 White North wall of central section – Building 3C
(Corridor) 0.01 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L73 Lime West wall of east washroom – Building 3C (Corridor) None
E11‐534‐L74 Dark green North wall of east office – Building 3C (Corridor) 0.12 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L75 Orange Southwest wall of east office – Building 3C
(corridor) 1.7 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L76 Dark green Central wall of east office – Building 3C (corridor) 0.14 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L77 White Southeast wall – Building 3C (Corridor) None
E11‐534‐L78 White South wall eastern section – Building 3C (Corridor) None
E11‐534‐L79 Orange North wall eastern section – Building 3C (Corridor) 3.9 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L80 White West wall western section – Building 3C –
(Corridor) 0.01 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L81 Green Far west door – Building 3C (Corridor) 0.05 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L82 Yellow Southwest wall – Building 3C (Corridor) 9.1 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L83 Green East wall – Building 3B‐1 0.5 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L84 White North wall – Building 3B‐1 0.30 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L85 Dark green West wall – Building 3B‐1 0.30 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L86 Yellow West wall – Building 3B‐1 13.6 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L87 Red South doorway – Building 3B‐1 0.07 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L88 White North wall of east section – Building 3B‐2 None
E11‐534‐L89 Black North wall of east section – Building 3B‐2 0.09 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L90 Black West wall of east section – Building 3B‐2 0.04 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L91 Aqua West wall of east section – Building 3B‐2 0.27 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L92 Aqua West wall of east section – Building 3B‐2 0.16 mg/cm2
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 2 (Continued) Summary of XRF Spot Test Analysis for Lead in Paint
Sampling Performed on November 16, 2011
Sample Number
Paint Colour Sample Location Lead
Concentration mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L93 Aqua East wall of central office – Building 3B‐2 6.15 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L94 White North wall of central section – Building 3B‐2 0.07 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L95 Dark green South wall of central section – Building 3B‐2 0.28 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L96 Light green Central wall – Building 3B‐2 0.09 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L97 Yellow Central doorway – Building 3B‐2 1.8 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L98 White South wall of east section – Building 3B‐2 0.12 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L99 White North wall of east section – Building 3B‐2 None
E11‐534‐L100 Grey North wall of east offices – Building 3B‐2 0.13 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L101 Grey West wall of east offices – Building 3B‐2 0.14 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L102 White West wall of east offices – Building 3B‐2 0.06 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L103 Green East wall of east offices – Building 3B‐2 0.28 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L104 Lime South wall of east section – Building 3B‐3 None
E11‐534‐L105 White North wall of east section – Building 3B‐3 1.5 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L106 Green North wall of east section – Building 3B‐3 0.5 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L107 White West wall of east section – Building 3B‐3 None
E11‐534‐L108 Green North bay door – Building 4 0.5 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L109 Black North bay door – Building 4 0.15 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L110 Lime East wall of central section – Building 4 0.10 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L111 Dark green East wall of central section – Building 4 0.13 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L112 Yellow South office wall – Building 4 2.8 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L113 Grey West office wall – Building 4 None
E11‐534‐L114 Grey North wall of central section – Building 4 1.3 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L115 Lime North wall of western section – Building 4 0.02 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L116 Dark green South wall of western section – Building 4 1.5 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L117 White East office wall – Building 3B‐5 0.01 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L118 Grey North open area wall – Building 3B‐5 0.02 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L119 Grey West open area wall – Building 3B‐5 0.13 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L120 White North office wall – Building 3B‐3 0.02 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L121 White South office wall – Building 3B‐3 0.02 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L122 Yellow Support column – Building 3B‐3 3.1 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L123 White West wall – Building 3B‐4 0.6 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L124 Beige West wall – Building 3B‐4 0.30 mg/cm2
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 2 (Continued) Summary of XRF Spot Test Analysis for Lead in Paint
Sampling Performed on November 16, 2011
Sample Number
Paint Colour Sample Location Lead
Concentration mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L125 White East wall of west open area – Building 5A‐1 0.02 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L126 White North wall of west open area – Building 5A‐1 None
E11‐534‐L127 Grey West wall of west open area – Building 5A‐1 0.08 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L128 White East wall of east open area – Building 5A‐1 0.01 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L129 Black East wall of entryway – Building 5A‐1 None
E11‐534‐L130 Blue East wall of entryway – Building 5A‐1 0.04 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L131 White East open area wall – Building 5A‐2 0.30 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L132 White North open area wall – Building 5A‐2 2.3 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L133 Red West open area wall – Building 5A‐2 0.30 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L134 White West open area wall – Building 5A‐2 1.2 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L135 White South open area wall – Building 5B 2.7 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L136 White North open area wall – Building 5B 1.7 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L137 Green South office area wall – Building 5B 0.7 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L138 Red South washroom wall – Building 5B 0.9 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L139 White North washroom wall – Building 5B None
E11‐534‐L140 White South washroom wall – Building 5B 0.14 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L141 Beige North office area wall – Building 5B 3.2 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L142 Green Partition wall in washroom – Building 5B 0.7 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L143 Grey Northwest entryway ‐ Building 5B None
E11‐534‐L144 Yellow Northeastern office wall – Building 5B None
E11‐534‐L145 White South open area wall – Building 5B 2.3 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L146 Off‐white West 2nd floor lunch room wall – Building 6B‐2 0.01 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L147 Off‐white East 2nd floor office wall – Building 6B‐2 None
E11‐534‐L148 Brown 2nd floor office doorframe – Building 6B‐2 0.02 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L149 Brown 2nd floor office window frame – Building 6B‐2 0.18 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L150 Off‐white North 2nd floor office wall – Building 6B‐2 None
E11‐534‐L151 Off‐white West 2nd floor washroom wall – Building 6B‐2 None
E11‐534‐L152 Aqua Floor of 1st floor entryway – Building 6B‐2 0.01 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L153 Lime West 1st floor office wall – Building 6B‐2 0.03 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L154 Lime East 1st floor office wall – Building 6B‐2 0.05 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L155 White North 1st floor office wall – Building 6B‐2 None
E11‐534‐L156 White West wall of open area – Building 6B‐1 None
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 2 (Continued) Summary of XRF Spot Test Analysis for Lead in Paint
Sampling Performed on November 16, 2011
Sample Number
Paint Colour Sample Location Lead
Concentration mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L157 Green North wall of open area – Building 6B‐1 0.30 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L158 Light blue West electrical area wall – Building 6B‐1 None
E11‐534‐L159 Yellow Entryway to bay area – Building 6B‐1 3.2 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L160 White Central partition wall in open area – Building 6B‐1 None
E11‐534‐L161 Sky blue North office wall – Building 6B‐1 0.4 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L162 Sky blue South office wall – Building 6B‐1 1.2 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L163 Off‐white West wall of north bay area – Building 6B‐1 None
E11‐534‐L164 White North open area wall – Building 6B‐1 0.7 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L165 Orange South wall of west bay area – Building 6B‐1 None
E11‐534‐L166 Grey West wall of west office area – Building 6B‐1 2.5 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L167 Grey East wall of west office area corridor – Building 6B‐
1 0.5 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L168 White South wall of southeast bay area – Building 6B‐1 None
E11‐534‐L169 Yellow Support column in western section – Building 6B‐1 0.22 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L170 Green North wall of northeast bay area – Building 6A‐2 0.4 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L171 Black East wall of northeast office area – Building 6A‐2 1.2 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L172 Red West wall of northeast office area – Building 6A‐2 0.16 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L173 White West wall of northeast office area – Building 6A‐2 0.01 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L174 Brown North wall of northeast open area – Building 6A‐2 0.9 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L175 Green South wall of northeast open area – Building 6A‐2 2.0 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L176 Yellow Northeast wall of northeast open area – Building
6A‐2 2.9 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L177 White South 3rd floor storage area wall – Building 6A‐2 0.02 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L178 Green West 3rd floor storage area wall – Building 6A‐2 0.09 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L179 Grey East 3rd floor open area wall – Building 6A‐2 0.10 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L180 Lime East 3rd floor office wall – Building 6A‐2 0.4 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L181 Green West 3rd floor open area wall – Building 6A‐2 0.08 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L182 Green West 2nd floor open area wall – Building 6A‐2 0.5 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L183 White South 2nd floor open area wall – Building 6A‐2 0.02 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L184 Green 2nd floor freight elevator door – Building 6A‐2 1.2 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L185 White North open area wall – Building 6A‐2 0.05 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L186 Green Southeast open area wall – Building 6A‐2 0.08 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L187 Beige East 2nd floor lunchroom wall – Building 6A‐2 0.02 mg/cm2
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 2 (Continued) Summary of XRF Spot Test Analysis for Lead in Paint
Sampling Performed on November 16, 2011
Sample Number
Paint Colour Sample Location Lead
Concentration mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L188 Black Ceiling of 2nd floor lunchroom – Building 6A‐2 0.03 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L189 Light blue South 2nd floor lunchroom wall – Building 6A‐2 None
E11‐534‐L190 Blue East 2nd floor locker room wall – Building 6A‐2 0.02 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L191 Light blue West 2nd floor corridor wall – Building 6A‐2 0.02 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L192 Beige South 2nd floor kitchen wall – Building 6A‐2 None
E11‐534‐L193 Lime South 2nd floor training room wall – Building 6A‐2 0.17 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L194 Black 2nd floor training room west door frame – Building
6A‐2 0.15 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L195 Purple Northeast exterior window frame – Building 8 0.29 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L196 Purple Northwest exterior window frame – Building 8 0.5 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L197 Orange Southwest wall – Building 8 1.6 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L198 Red West wall of standpipe housing – Building 8 0.21 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L199 White South wall ‐ Building 9 None
E11‐534‐L200 Yellow Partition wall entryway – Building 9 7.8 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L201 Red Central door – Building 10 None
E11‐534‐L202 White East door – Building 10 0.01 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L203 Purple East door frame – Building 10 0.01 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L204 Red Door – Building 11 0.19 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L205 Green North open area wall – Building 6A‐1 0.02 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L206 White West open area wall – Building 6A‐1 0.01 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L207 Green South open area wall – Building 6A‐1 0.14 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L208 Orange West office area door – Building 6A‐1 2.4 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L209 White East shower area wall – Building 6A‐1 0.01 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L210 White North entryway wall – Building 6A‐1 0.02 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L211 Light brown East exterior wall – Time Keepers Building 1.6 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L212 Light brown North exterior wall – Time Keepers Building 0.04 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L213 White North window frame – Time Keepers Building 8.4 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L214 White West central wall – Time Keepers Building 0.02 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L215 White West wall of central section – Time Keepers
Building 0.6 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L216 Red South door frame – Cockshutt Building 0.30 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L217 Brown South door frame – Cockshutt Building 0.02 mg/cm2
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 2 (Continued) Summary of XRF Spot Test Analysis for Lead in Paint
Sampling Performed on November 16, 2011
Sample Number
Paint Colour Sample Location Lead
Concentration mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L218 White East wall of southwest office area – Cockshutt
Building 0.22 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L219 White Central door frame – Cockshutt Building 0.6 mg/cm2
E11‐534‐L220 Light blue East corridor wall – Cockshutt Building None
E11‐534‐L221 Off‐white North wall of central stairwell – Cockshutt Building 18.0 mg/cm2
Note: The lead results reported above are the actual readings from the XRF. Paints considered lead‐containing are highlighted and the actual lead concentrations detected are presented. Results were lead was not detected or was below the limit of detection for the XRF are expressed as “None.”
Table 3 Summary of the Visual Inspection of Fluorescent Light Ballast for PCB Content
Manufacturer Catalogue Number
Location Quantity Observed
PCB Containing
Philips RQM‐2S40‐TPC Building 3B‐1 2 No – Labeled Advance
Transformer Co. 72C53C1‐NP Building 3B‐1 1 No – Labeled
Canadian General Electric
17A240T Building 3B‐1 2 Suspected
Canadian General Electric
17A296T 2nd Floor – Building 6A‐2 1 Suspected
Canadian General Electric
17A50A Boiler Room – Building 3B‐3 2 Suspected
Canadian General Electric
17A297TW Boiler Room – Building 3B‐3 1 Suspected
Canadian General Electric
17A295A Boiler Room – Building 3B‐3 1 Suspected
Universal 446‐LR‐TC‐P Cockshutt Building 1 Suspected Canadian General
Electric 9510 Building 3C 2 Suspected
Canadian General Electric
15A286 Building 5A‐2 1 Suspected
Ballastronix Inc. 570322 1st floor office area – Building
5A‐1 1 No – Labeled
Universal 805‐BR‐TC‐P 4th floor open area – Building
1B 2 Suspected
Canadian General Electric
17A240A 4th floor open area – Building
1B 2 Suspected
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 3 (Continued) Summary of the Visual Inspection of Fluorescent Light Ballast for PCB Content
Manufacturer Catalogue Number
Location Quantity Observed
PCB Containing
Sola Basic Limited 570‐302T 1st floor office area – Building
3B‐3 1 Suspected
Table 4
Summary of Hazardous Materials
Building Material Description Location
3B‐3 2 unlabeled compressed gas cylinders –
unknown volume South section of central open
area on 1st floor
3B‐3 5 gallon storage container – unknown
contents South section of central open
area on 1st floor
3B‐1 5 large unlabeled drums – unknown liquid Southeast section of main open
area
3B‐1 4 large unlabeled drums – unknown electrical
equipment South section of main open
area
3B‐1 17 small unlabeled compressed gas cylinders
– unknown material South section of main open
area
3B‐1 3 large unlabeled compressed gas cylinders –
unknown material South section of main open
area
3B‐1 12 large batteries South section of main open
area
5B 5 small storage containers – unknown liquid Main open area adjacent to
locker area
8 Former PCB storage compound Fenced in section in the
southeast corner
6A‐1 4 paint cans – unknown contents Northwest entryway adjacent
to shower area
6A‐1 2 gasoline containers – unknown contents Northwest entryway adjacent
to shower area
6A‐1 1 “Quick Start” spray can – unknown contents Northwest entryway adjacent
to shower area
6A‐1 1 Transmission fluid storage container –
unknown contents Northwest entryway adjacent
to shower area
6A‐1 1 6 gallon storage container – unknown
contents Northwest entryway adjacent
to shower area
6B‐1 16.9 Litre “504004 Industrial Enamel”
container – unknown contents Western office area on 1st floor
6B‐1 18.9 Litre “ALKYD Fast Dry Yellow” container
– unknown contents Western office area on 1st floor
6A‐2 14 storage continuers – unknown contents Northeast section of the 1st floor adjacent to the freight
elevator
Sampling and Testing Results ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix B E11‐534
Table 4 (Continued) Stored Hazardous Materials
Building Material Description and Quantity Location
6A‐2 5 Gallon “Mobil Velocite Oil C” container –
unknown contents On a rack in the 3rd floor
storage area
Time Keepers Building 1 small compressed gas cylinder – unknown
contents West room
Time Keepers Building 1 medium sized compressed gas cylinder –
unknown contents West room
Table 5
Ozone Depleting Substances
Building Equipment Type and
Quantity Refrigerant Location ODS
6B‐1 1 Air‐conditioning unit –
Refrigerant 22 R22
Western office area on 1st floor
Yes
2 1 Refrigerator Unknown – Unlabeled
2nd floor west apartment Suspected
Time Keepers Building
1 Refrigerator R12 West room Yes
Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Street, Brantford, Ontario E11-534
Appendix C
Room by Room ACM Inventory Table 6
The Corporation of the City of Brantford Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials SurveyGreenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site - Vacant Buildings
347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
Amount Unit
1 1 - Annex Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 3 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 1 - Annex Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 30 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 1 - Open Work Area
Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 20 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 1 - Open Work Area
Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 500 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
2 1 - Vacant Office Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 3 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
2 1 - Vacant Office Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 70 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
2 2 - Vacant Office Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 16 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
2 3 - Vacant Office Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 16 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
2 4 - Vacant Work Area
White joint filler between wall and gypsum paneling in east vacant area 20 LF N Fair E11-534-6ABC 3-5% Chrysotile Type 2
2 4 - Vacant Work Area
Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 90 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
2 5 - Stairwell Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 10 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
2 6 - Large Open Area
Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 25 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
2 6 - Large Open Area
Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 1200 LF Y Fair/Poor E11-534-4ABC 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
2 7 - Washroom Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 45 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
2 8 - Stairwell Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 10 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
3 1 - Open Area Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 1 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
3 1 - Open Area Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 5 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure4 4 - Washroom Rigid black liner - toilet bowl liner 6 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-3ABC 12-18% Chrysotile Type 1
1 1 - Open Area Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 15 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 1 - Open Area Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 400 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 1 - Open Area Cement wall board - west interior wall 100 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-10ABC 20-25% Chrysotile Type 1
1 5 - Open Area Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 2 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
Table 6 - Room By Room ACM Inventory
Room/AreaLevelBuilding Friable(Y/N)
Estimated Building Material/Location Type of Removal Procedure
Percent/Type of AsbestosSample ID
1A
1B
Condition
2
Units Legend: LF - Linear Feet; EA - Each; SF - Square Feet
E11-534 (November, 2011) 1
The Corporation of the City of Brantford Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials SurveyGreenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site - Vacant Buildings
347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
Amount Unit
Table 6 - Room By Room ACM Inventory
Room/AreaLevelBuilding Friable(Y/N)
Estimated Building Material/Location Type of Removal Procedure
Percent/Type of AsbestosSample IDCondition
1 5 - Open Area Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 10 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 6 - Vacant (West) Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 3 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 7 - Washroom Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 10 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 7 - Washroom Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 45 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 1 - Open Area Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 8 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 1 - Open Area White pipe wrap mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 570 LF Y Fair/Poor E11-534-16ABC 30-40% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 2 - Far East Room White pipe wrap mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 3 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-16 30-40% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 3 - Vestibule Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 20 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 4 - Central Room Cement wall board on central wall of 1st floor 750 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-18ABC 15-20% Chrysotile Type 1
1 4 - Central Room Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 250 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 5 - Far East Room White pipe wrap mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 200 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-16 30-40% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure1 7 - First Floor White caulking - window frame 5000 LF N Fair/Poor E11-534-14A-G 2% Chrysotile Type 1
1 1 - Forge A Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 4 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 1 - Forge A Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 210 LF Y Fair/Poor E11-534-22ABC 30-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 1 - Office Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 1 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 1 - Office Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 25 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 2 - Open Area (East)
Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 12 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 2 - Open Area (East)
Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 100 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 2 - Open Area (East) White caulking - window frame 200 LF N Fair/Poor E11-534-28ABC 2% Chrysotile Type 1
1 4 - Central Open Area
Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 5 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 4 - Central Open Area
Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 80 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 5 - Central Vacant Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 5 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
2
3A
3B-1
3B-2
Units Legend: LF - Linear Feet; EA - Each; SF - Square Feet
E11-534 (November, 2011) 2
The Corporation of the City of Brantford Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials SurveyGreenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site - Vacant Buildings
347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
Amount Unit
Table 6 - Room By Room ACM Inventory
Room/AreaLevelBuilding Friable(Y/N)
Estimated Building Material/Location Type of Removal Procedure
Percent/Type of AsbestosSample IDCondition
1 5 - Central Vacant Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 80 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 6 - Vacant (West) Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 6 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 6 - Vacant (West) Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 85 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 7 - Vacant Offices Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 2 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 7 - Vacant Offices Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 25 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 10 - East Open Area
Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 200 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 10 - East Open Area
Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 8 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 10 - Vacant Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 55 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure1 2 - Boiler (East) Beige insulation - on boiler hatch 70 SF Y Fair/Poor E11-534-82ABC 4% Amosite Type 3 Enclosure
1 2 - Boiler (East) Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 75 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 2 - Boiler (East) Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 200 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 2 - Boiler (East) Mag-Block mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 300 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-17 30% Amosite Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 2 - Boiler (East) Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on boiler tank 400 SF Y Fair/Poor E11-534-80ABC 40% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 3 - Boiler Room (Small Room)
Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 35 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 3 - Boiler Room (Small Room)
Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 70 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 4 - Boiler (West) Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 25 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 4 - Boiler (West) Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 60 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 4 - Boiler (West) Mag-Block mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 100 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-17 30% Amosite Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 4 - Boiler (West) Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on boiler tank 400 SF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-80 40% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 7 - Mechanical White mechanical systems insulation - on tank 150 SF Y Fair/Poor E11-534-83ABC 45% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 7 - Mechanical Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 20 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 8 - Room West of Boiler Room
Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 200 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
3B-2
3B-3
Units Legend: LF - Linear Feet; EA - Each; SF - Square Feet
E11-534 (November, 2011) 3
The Corporation of the City of Brantford Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials SurveyGreenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site - Vacant Buildings
347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
Amount Unit
Table 6 - Room By Room ACM Inventory
Room/AreaLevelBuilding Friable(Y/N)
Estimated Building Material/Location Type of Removal Procedure
Percent/Type of AsbestosSample IDCondition
1 9 - Vacant Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 30 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1-2 5 - Boiler (West) - Upper Level
Mag-Block mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 45 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-17 30% Amosite Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1-2 6 - Mechanical Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 25 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
3B-4 1 1 - Rubble Air-cell mechanical systems insulation 50 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or Type 3 Enclosure
1 1 - Washroom Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 2 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 1 - Washroom Mag-Block mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 45 LF Y Fair/Poor E11-534-17ABC 30% Amosite Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure1 3 - Open Area Black roofing materials 11000 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-19 2-4% Chrysotile Type 1
1 3 - Open Area Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 200 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 4 - Far East Room Black roofing materials 16500 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-19A-G 2-4% Chrysotile Type 1
1 4 - Far East Room Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 10 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 6 - Central Area Cement wall board - within abandoned machinery 300 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-18 15-20% Chrysotile Type 1
1 6 - Central Area Black roofing materials 18000 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-19 2-4% Chrysotile Type 1
1 6 - Central Area Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 400 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 9 - West Open Area Black roofing materials 21000 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-19 2-4% Chrysotile Type 1
1 9 - West Open Area Flexible duct joint material 1 EA N Fair/Poor Inaccessible Assumed Type 1
1 9 - West Open Area
Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 200 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 1 - East Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 65 LF Y Fair Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure1 1 - East Cement wall board 500 SF N Fair Similar to E11-534-58 15-20% Chrysotile Type 11 2 - Central-East White caulking - window frame 450 LF N Fair/Poor E11-534-26ABC 2% Chrysotile Type 1
1 2 - Central-East Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 5 EA Y Fair Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 2 - Central-East Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 55 LF Y Fair Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 3 - Central Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 35 LF Y Fair Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure1 5 - Far-West Cement wall board 1500 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-58 15-20% Chrysotile Type 11 6 - Exterior Cement wall board on exterior wall 1500 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-58 15-20% Chrysotile Type 1
5A-2 1 1 - Open Area Cement wall board on east wall 500 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-18 15-20% Chrysotile Type 1
3B-3
3C (Corridor)
4
Units Legend: LF - Linear Feet; EA - Each; SF - Square Feet
E11-534 (November, 2011) 4
The Corporation of the City of Brantford Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials SurveyGreenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site - Vacant Buildings
347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
Amount Unit
Table 6 - Room By Room ACM Inventory
Room/AreaLevelBuilding Friable(Y/N)
Estimated Building Material/Location Type of Removal Procedure
Percent/Type of AsbestosSample IDCondition
5A-2 1 1 - Open Area Flexible duct joint material 200 LF N Fair Inaccessible Assumed Type 11 3 - Washroom Drywall joint compound on ceiling 250 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-33ABC 2% Chrysotile Type 2
1 3 - Washroom Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 6 EA Y Fair Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 3 - Washroom Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 10 LF Y Fair Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure1 3 - Washroom Cement wall board - west wall 300 SF N Fair Similar to E11-534-18 15-20% Chrysotile Type 1
1 4 - Change Room Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 60 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 4 - Change Room Cement wall board - southwest corner 250 SF N Fair Similar to E11-534-18 15-20% Chrysotile Type 1
1 5 - Shower Cement ceiling tile 33 EA N Fair Similar to E11-534-18 15-20% Chrysotile Type 1
1 5 - Shower Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 35 LF Y Fair Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 6 - Vacant Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 50 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 6 - Vacant Mag-Block mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 20 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-17 30% Amosite Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure1 6 - Vacant Brown caulking - window frame 100 LF N Fair/Poor E11-534-35ABC 2% Chrysotile Type 1
1 7 - Washroom Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 15 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 7 - Washroom Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 60 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 7 - Washroom Mag-Block mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 15 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-17 30% Amosite Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 8 - Vacant Air-cell mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 12 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure1 9 - Exterior Walls Cement wall board - all exterior walls 35000 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-18 15-20% Chrysotile Type 1
1 2 - Vestibule Vinyl floor tile - 12"x12" grey - 1st floor vestibule 200 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-39ABC 3-4% Chrysotile Type 1
1 3 - Showers/Lockers Black mastic below vinyl floor 850 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-40ABC 2-4% Chrysotile Type 1
1 3 - Showers/Lockers
Vinyl floor tile - 12"x12" brown, light brown, rust and white - shower / locker
area850 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-40ABC 3-4% Chrysotile Type 1
1 4 - Exterior White caulking - south windows 500 LF N Fair/Poor E11-534-77ABC 0.5% Chrysotile Type 1
1 2 - Outbuilding Cement wall board adjacent to the south wall 5000 SF N Fair E11-534-74ABC 20% Chrysotile Type 1
1 2 - Outbuilding White mechanical systems insulation on pipe straight 70 SF Y Fair/Poor E11-534-75ABC 15% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure1 3 - Exterior Cement wall board - north wall 50000 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-75 20% Chrysotile Type 11 3 - Exterior Cement wall board - south wall 25000 SF N Fair Similar to E11-534-74 20% Chrysotile Type 1
5B
6A-1
6A-2
Units Legend: LF - Linear Feet; EA - Each; SF - Square Feet
E11-534 (November, 2011) 5
The Corporation of the City of Brantford Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials SurveyGreenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site - Vacant Buildings
347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
Amount Unit
Table 6 - Room By Room ACM Inventory
Room/AreaLevelBuilding Friable(Y/N)
Estimated Building Material/Location Type of Removal Procedure
Percent/Type of AsbestosSample IDCondition
1 9 - Open Area Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 15 EA Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-5 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure2 2 - 2nd Floor Black mastic below vinyl floor 800 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-60ABC 3-4% Chrysotile Type 1
2 2 - 2nd Floor Air-cell mechanical systems insulation in corner of room 7 LF Y Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-4 25-35% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
2 2 - 2nd Floor Vinyl floor tile - 9"x9" orange - training room 800 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-60ABC 4-6% Chrysotile Type 1
3 1 - Storage Cement wall board 3000 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-58ABC 15-20% Chrysotile Type 1
1 7 - Large Open Area
Parging cement mechanical systems insulation on fitting 35 EA Y Fair E11-534-5ABC 25-30% Chrysotile Type 2 Glove Bag or
Type 3 Enclosure
1 7 - Large Open Area White caulking - window frame 400 LF N Fair/Poor E11-534-57ABC 2% Chrysotile Type 1
1 8 - Exterior Walls Cement wall board - east wall 10000 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-74 20% Chrysotile Type 11 1 - Office Drywall joint compound 50 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-41 2-4% Chrysotile Type 21 2 - Entryway Drywall joint compound on ceiling 150 SF N Fair E11-534-41H 3% Chrysotile Type 21 3 - Office Black mastic below vinyl floor 750 SF N Fair Similar to E11-534-46 3% Chrysotile Type 1
1 3 - Office Vinyl floor tile - 12"x12" white with blackstreaks - office area 750 SF N Fair Similar to E11-534-46 3-4% Chrysotile Type 1
1 4 - Office/Washroom Black mastic below vinyl floor 500 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-46 3% Chrysotile Type 1
1 4 - Office/Washroom Drywall joint compound on ceiling 100 SF N Fair Similar to E11-534-41 2-4% Chrysotile Type 2
1 4 - Office/Washroom
Vinyl floor tile - 9"x9" grey with brown streaks - Janitors Closet 20 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-52ABC 2-3% Chrysotile Type 1
1 4 - Office/Washroom
Vinyl floor tile - 12"x12" white with blackstreaks - office / washroom area 500 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-46 3-4% Chrysotile Type 1
2 1 - Stairwell Drywall joint compound on ceiling 200 SF N Fair E11-534-41A 2% Chrysotile Type 22 2 - Kitchen Black mastic below vinyl floor 500 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-44ABC 5% Chrysotile Type 1
2 2 - Kitchen Vinyl floor tile - 12"x12" beige with thin brown streaks 200 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-43ABC 3-5% Chrysotile Type 1
2 2 - Kitchen White heat shield <1 SF N Fair E11-534-45ABC 25-30% Chrysotile Type 12 2 - Kitchen Drywall joint compound 350 SF N Fair E11-534-41BC 2-3% Chrysotile Type 22 3 - Office Black mastic below vinyl floor 1800 SF N Fair E11-534-46C 3% Chrysotile Type 1
2 3 - Office Vinyl floor tile - 12"x12" white with blackstreaks - under carpet 1800 SF N Fair E11-534-46ABC 3-4% Chrysotile Type 1
2 3 - Office White heat shield - mechanical area <1 SF N Fair Similar to E11-534-45 25-30% Chrysotile Type 12 3 - Office Drywall joint compound 1000 SF N Fair E11-534-41D-G 2-4% Chrysotile Type 2
2 4 - Office/Washroom Black mastic below vinyl floor 200 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-48C 2% Chrysotile Type 1
2 4 - Office/Washroom Black mastic below vinyl floor 200 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-49C 2% Chrysotile Type 1
6B-2 (Administration)
6B-1
6A-2
Units Legend: LF - Linear Feet; EA - Each; SF - Square Feet
E11-534 (November, 2011) 6
The Corporation of the City of Brantford Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials SurveyGreenwich Mohawk Brownfield Site - Vacant Buildings
347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
Amount Unit
Table 6 - Room By Room ACM Inventory
Room/AreaLevelBuilding Friable(Y/N)
Estimated Building Material/Location Type of Removal Procedure
Percent/Type of AsbestosSample IDCondition
2 4 - Office/Washroom Black mastic below vinyl floor 1300 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-46 3% Chrysotile Type 1
2 4 - Office/Washroom Drywall joint compound on ceiling 800 SF N Fair Similar to E11-534-41 2-4% Chrysotile Type 2
2 4 - Office/Washroom
Vinyl floor tile - 12"x12" blue with grey and white streaks - men's washroom 200 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-48ABC 2% Chrysotile Type 1
2 4 - Office/Washroom
Vinyl floor tile - 12"x12" white with blackstreaks - office / washroom area 1300 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-46 3-4% Chrysotile Type 1
2 4 - Office/Washroom
Vinyl floor tile - 12"x12" beige with fine brown streaks - women's washroom 200 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-49ABC 2-3% Chrysotile Type 1
2 4 - Office/Washroom Drywall joint compound 1000 SF N Fair Similar to E11-534-41 2-4% Chrysotile Type 2
1 1 - Vacant (East) Cement wall board - east bay area 250 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-58 15-20% Chrysotile Type 1
1 3 - Exterior Grey caulking - between east and west portions of building 60 LF N Fair/Poor E11-534-67ABC 10-15% Chrysotile Type 1
1 3 - Exterior Black roofing felt 3000 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-69ABC 2-4% Chrysotile Type 11 3 - Exterior Cement wall board - exterior walls 1500 SF N Fair/Poor Similar to E11-534-58 15-20% Chrysotile Type 1
1 1 - Entire Building Black mastic below vinyl floor 100 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-98ABC 6% Chrysotile Type 1
1 1 - Entire Building Black mastic below vinyl floor 100 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-99ABC 6% Chrysotile Type 1
1 1 - Entire Building Black mastic - western room 200 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-100ABC 15% Chrysotile Type 1
1 1 - Entire Building Vinyl floor tile - 9"x9" white - western room 100 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-99ABC 3% Chrysotile Type 1
1 1 - Entire Building Vinyl floor tile - 9"x9" green - western room 100 SF N Fair/Poor E11-534-98ABC 8% Chrysotile Type 1
Note: Although not expressly identified, estimated quantities and building material descriptions are to include ACMs in poor condition, which have fallen and resideNote: beneath its original location.
6B-2 (Administration)
9
1 (Time Keepers)
Note: The room by room materials summary does not include inaccessible roofing materials or fire doors. These materials shall be assumed asbestos-containing. Note: There is the possibility that materials may exist that could not be reasonably identified within the scope of the assessment or which were not apparent during the site visit.
Units Legend: LF - Linear Feet; EA - Each; SF - Square Feet
E11-534 (November, 2011) 7
Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Street, Brantford, Ontario E11-534
Appendix D
Background and Past Uses of Designated Substances
Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report Greenwich Mohawk Brownfields Site – Vacant Buildings 347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
Appendix D - Background and Past Uses of Designated Substances
E11-534 (November 2011)
1
Appendix D - Background and Past Uses of Designated Substances
Prior to the establishment and mainstream acknowledgement of the negative health consequences associated with human exposure to designated substances defined in the Act, these substances found use in an assortment of applications. The adverse health effects and common applications of substances regulated under the Act are summarized in this section.
1. Asbestos Unlike other designated substances regulated under the act that are unimolecular (one chemical), asbestos is a term used to describe a group of minerals, all with long, thin fibrous crystals. In the late 19th century, asbestos maintained large popularity among the manufacturing and construction industries due to its resistance to heat, chemical and electrical damage, its sound absorption properties, tensile strength and affordability. These desirable characteristics resulted in the appearance of asbestos containing materials (ACM) in construction products such as flat and corrugated sheets, pipes and shingles, vinyl flooring, linoleum, roofing felts, reinforced cement products, coatings and mastics and asbestos paper products. Asbestos’ thermal insulating properties resulted in its appearance in sprayed insulation and fireproofing for steel structures, often in high relative ratios. Its capacity to absorb both heat and acoustic energy prompted its use as thermal/acoustic insulation for pipes and boilers. The three most prevalent and widely used types of asbestos were; 1) chrysotile; 2) amosite, and; 3) crocidolite.
In the early 1970s, the use of asbestos products declined sharply due to increasing concerns raised over the material’s health effects. By mid 1979, the specific prohibition and the availability of safer alternatives largely put an end to the use of many asbestos products.
Due to the extensive use of ACM in the construction industry over a period of approximately 50 years, the concern over the possibility of individuals being exposed to ACM is a legitimate one. It has been shown that inhalation of asbestos fibres at high concentrations or over extended periods of time can cause asbestosis, lung cancer or mesothelioma. However, it has been well established that, unless damaged or disturbed, satisfactorily encapsulated ACM does not pose a hazard to worker or employee health and safety.
2. Lead Lead is a heavy metal that has been used by humans in industrial applications for several millennia. Lead may be used in its pure metallic form or combined chemically with other elements to form lead compounds. Inorganic lead compounds (lead salts) result when lead forms an ionic bond with atomic or polyatomic anions, examples of which include lead oxide, lead chromate, lead carbonate and lead nitrate. Inorganic lead compounds may exist in either the solid or liquid state and have found use in applications such as insecticides, pigments, paints, glasses, plastics and rubber compounds. Lead was used as a primary ingredient in many interior and exterior oil‐based paints from the early 1900s to the late 1970s. Interior or exterior paints produced after 1970 may however; still contain small amounts of lead. Lead can enter the human body through all known mechanisms of toxicological exposure; inhalation, ingestion and dermal absorption. The toxicological dynamics and kinetics of lead are such that no amount of lead exposure is safe. Worker exposure to lead in the form of a high dose sustained over a short time period or after chronic exposure to low doses can both result in severe adverse health effects.
Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report Greenwich Mohawk Brownfields Site – Vacant Buildings 347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
Appendix D - Background and Past Uses of Designated Substances
E11-534 (November 2011)
2
Lead dust is a particular hazard in buildings. Lead conjugated particulate has been documented to be aerosolized in facilities that house applications such as rifle/gun ranges or industrial processes such as sanding, cutting or grinding of lead‐containing materials.
3. Silica Silica has found use in a variety of applications, including: sandblasting; abrasive grinding and scouring, resin, moulds casting and glass manufacturing and in processes related to the production of electronic components and fibreglass.
The prolonged inhalation of dust containing free crystalline silica results in a disease known assilicosis. Silicosis is a pneumoconiosis (a lung disease caused by the inhalation of dust) and is characterized by progressive fibrosis of the lungs and marked by shortness of breath, impaired lung function and subsequent complications that sometimes result in death. In the construction sector, silica (as common sand) is a major ingredient of concrete and cement products such as masonry and mortar. Concern over silica’s adverse health effects are raised when silica becomes respirable for two reasons; 1) smaller silica particles can more deeply permeate into the lungs, resulting in a higher capacity for the material to cause adverse damage on a per mass basis and; 2) these smaller sized particles are more easily aerosolized than their larger, non‐respirable counterparts. Processes such as cutting, abrading, and drilling of concrete and other sand‐containing materials creates respirable silica‐containing dust that has the potential to be inhaled by workers who do not use appropriate protective measures and personal protective equipment.
4. Mercury Mercury is a silver‐coloured metal that exists in the liquid state at room temperature. Mercury has been and is currently used in commercial applications as both a pure metal and in metallic, chelated compounds. The greatest use of elemental mercury in Ontario is in electrical equipment such as silent position dependent switches. Small amounts of mercury compounds are present in fluorescent tubes and mercury vapour lamps, older thermostats and paints.
The health effects associated with mercury exposure include respiratory irritation resulting in coughing and chest pain, kidney damage, skin irritation and possible harm to the nervous system. Exposure to mercury can occur through in ingestion or absorption through the skin.
5. Other Designated Substances
5.1 Ethylene oxide Ethylene oxide is a colourless gas or liquid with and ether like odour. It is used in the pharmaceutical industry and by hospitals as a disinfectant of plastic items that cannot be autoclaved.
The health effects associated with ethylene oxide include eye, skin and respiratory irritation as well as blisters on the skin for short term exposures and asthma and nervous system damages for long term exposure. Exposure to ethylene oxide can occur through inhalation of the vapours or absorption through the skin when mixed in a water solution.
Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report Greenwich Mohawk Brownfields Site – Vacant Buildings 347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
Appendix D - Background and Past Uses of Designated Substances
E11-534 (November 2011)
3
5.2 Isocyanates Isocyanates are compounds that contain the isocyanates group of atoms that consist of Nitrogen, Carbon and Oxygen which react with compounds containing alcohol to produce polyurethane polymers in the manufacture of certain types of plastics, foams, coatings and other products.
The health effects associated with exposure to isocyanates include reduced lung function, shortness of breath and fever. Exposure to isocyanates can occur through exposure to their vapours or direct contact.
5.3 Acrylonitrile Acrylonitrile is a clear, (colourless or yellow) liquid that is explosive, flammable and toxic. It is used mainly as a monomer or co monomer in the production of synthetic fibres, plastics and elastomers in the production of rubbers, coatings, gaskets, seals, hoses and adhesives.
The health effects associated with acute exposure to acrylonitrile can include eye and skin irritation, blisters, headaches and vomiting. Chronic exposure to acrylonitrile can result in cancers of the stomach, lymph system and brain. Exposure to acrylonitrile can occur through inhalation, skin absorption, ingestion, skin and/or eye contact.
5.4 Coke Oven Emissions Coke Oven Emissions are the benzene‐soluble fraction of total particulate matter released during the carbonization of bituminous coal for the production of coke. Coke oven emissions are a mixture of coal tar, coal tar pitch and creosote.
The health effects associated with exposure to coke oven emissions include eye irritation, lesions of the respiratory and digestive systems, cough, difficulty breathing and wheezing. Coke oven emissions have been shown to be a potential carcinogen resulting in cancers of the skin, lung, kidney and bladder. Exposure to coke oven emissions can occur through inhalation of vapours or through skin and eye contact.
5.5 Benzene Benzene is a clear, colourless and highly volatile organic solvent with and aromatic odour. Benzene is a highly flammable material and is primarily found as a by‐product in petroleum refining. Benzene is used in a number of processes in chemical laboratories and within the chemical industry in order produce materials such as styrene, synthetic rubbers, plastics and solvents.
The health effects of benzene include eye, sin and respiratory system irritation, dizziness, headache, nausea, staggered gait, anorexia, weakness, exhaustion, dermatitis and blood and bone marrow toxicity. Exposure to benzene can occur through inhalation of vapours, skin absorption, ingestion or eye contact.
5.6 Arsenic Arsenic in its most common form is a grey in colour with a metallic appearance. Arsenic is a metalloid used to harden copper, lead and other alloys, in the manufacture of electronics and glass and in numerous other applications. Its mechanism of toxicity is via the arrest of cellular respiration and can be absorbed via ingestion, inhalation or dermal absorption.
Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report Greenwich Mohawk Brownfields Site – Vacant Buildings 347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
Appendix D - Background and Past Uses of Designated Substances
E11-534 (November 2011)
4
The health effects of arsenic include ulceration of the nasal septum, dermatitis, gastrointestinal disturbances, peripheral neuropathy, respiratory system irritation and hyperpigmentation of the skin. Arsenic has also been shown to be potentially carcinogenic resulting in cancers of the liver, kidney’s skin, lungs and lymphatic system. Exposure to arsenic can occur through inhalation, skin absorption, skin and/or eye contact and ingestion.
5.7 Vinyl Chloride Vinyl chloride is a colourless gas with a sweet odour that is used in the manufacture of various products in the building and construction sectors, including the automotive industry, electrical wire insulation, cables, piping, industrial and household equipment, and medical supplies. Vinyl chloride is also known as chloroethene, chloroethylene and ethylene monochloride and can occur as a result of the breakdown of other substances such as trichloroethane, trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene.
The health effects of airborne vinyl chloride include lassitude (weakness, exhaustion), abdominal pain, gastrointestinal bleeding, enlarged liver, pallor or cyanosis of extremities. As a liquid the health effects from vinyl chloride include frostbite. Chronic exposure to vinyl chloride can cause liver cancer. Exposure to vinyl chloride can occur from industrial leaks, hazardous waste sites and landfills.
6. Other Hazardous Materials
6.1 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) PCBs have been synthetically manufactured on a commercial basis since 1929. They have never been manufactured in Canada, with the entire supply coming form the USA. By the late 1960s, the toxic effects of PCBs started to gain recognition, as did its bioaccumulative properties, as significant levels of PCBs were being detected within species throughout the world’s most remote environments. Throughout the 1970s, the manufacture of PCBs was phased out; however considerable amounts remain in use.
PCBs were commonly used in electrical equipment because of their excellent electrical and fire resistant properties. For a considerable period of time, askarels (a mixture of chlorobenzenes and PCBs) were the coolants of choice for indoor transformers. Many outdoor transformers with mineral oil coolant became contaminated with PCBs during manufacture or servicing.
PCBs were also used in a variety of other products including heat transfer fluids, lubricants, plasticizers, inks, dyes, pesticides and adhesives.
6.2 Ozone Depleting Substances (ODSs) ODSs such as halocarbons are synthetic, organic compounds that containing halogen species, namely fluorine, chlorine, and bromine. These substances have either been classified into groups based on chemical structure (such as the fluorocarbons, the halons, the chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), and the hydro chlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs)) or are molecules that cannot be grouped into such classifications on the basis of their physical/chemical properties (such as carbon tetrachloride, methyl chloroform, and methyl bromide). Canadian environmental legislation aimed at prohibiting the release of these substances is in effect, as they are known contributors to ozone depletion.
ODS‐based solvents (particularly CFCs and HCFCs) have found general use in numerous domestic, commercial and industrial applications. Halocarbons are used primarily as a refrigerant and as a blowing
Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report Greenwich Mohawk Brownfields Site – Vacant Buildings 347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
Appendix D - Background and Past Uses of Designated Substances
E11-534 (November 2011)
5
agent in foam product manufacturing. In buildings, ODSs are commonly found in refrigeration systems, halon fire extinguishers and air conditioning systems.
6.3 Moulds Moulds belong to the fungi kingdom along with mushrooms and yeast and are found year round outdoors. Moulds are primitive plants that lack chlorophyll and must live as parasites or feed on organic matter that they digest externally and adsorb. Mould colonies grow best in dark, moist habitats and wherever organic matter is present. In outdoor environments, moulds live in soil, on plants and on dead or decaying matter. In indoor environments services and building finishes affected by mould include gypsum boards, carpet, ceiling tiles, wood products, ducts and HVAC units. Water damage and infiltration is the primary cause of mould proliferation in buildings.
Most fungi, including moulds, produce microscopic cells called “spores” that spread easily through the air and can remain in suspension for long periods of time. Moulds can also remain dormant, hidden within wall cavities, constituting an enduring cause of adverse health effects. Under the right conditions mould spores act like seeds, forming new mould growths (colonies). Mould requires moisture to grow and therefore incidents of water damage, high humidity, or dampness can promote mould to grow indoors. Common sources of indoor moisture that cause mould growth include flooding, roof and plumbing leaks, damp basements or crawl spaces, or any moisture condensation on cold surfaces.
There are thousands of species of mould and they can be any colour. To be certain that a visible growth is in fact mould and to identify different species, a trained mycologist has to examine a sample under a microscope. Many times, mould can be detected by a musty odour, although odour alone is not sufficient to identify mould growth.
Most people have no reaction when exposed to moulds. Some individuals can have allergic reactions, similar to common pollen or animal allergies. Common symptoms associated with exposure to moulds include allergic, infectious and toxic responses, including headache, eye, nose and throat irritation, nose bleeds, fatigue, cough and suppression of immune functions. The aged population and individuals with compromised immune systems are most susceptible to illnesses related to mould exposure.
6.4 Urea Formaldehyde Foam Insulation (UFFI) UFFI is a solid product that was used in buildings (particularly residential dwellings) as injectable insulation, often in cases where it was otherwise impractical to provide conventional insulation. UFFI was used extensively throughout the 1970s, with particular usage between 1975 and 1978, the time period during which the Canadian Home Insulation Program, a financial incentive program to encourage home insulation upgrades administered by the federal government, was in effect. The insulation was approved for use in Canada in exterior wood‐frame walls only and was banned for use in 1980.
UFFI contains formaldehyde, which in a non‐vapour state, is not believed to cause adverse health effects in humans. Concerns regarding the safety of UFFI were raised when it became known that the material has the capacity to release formaldehyde gas, a well‐known probable human carcinogen.
As a solid product, UFFI is considered to be safe for human contact. However, upon initial application of the foam, small amounts of formaldehyde may be released to the air. Given that there is a finite amount of formaldehyde available for off‐gassing, the rate of formaldehyde release from the foam declines
Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report Greenwich Mohawk Brownfields Site – Vacant Buildings 347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Streets, Brantford, Ontario
Appendix D - Background and Past Uses of Designated Substances
E11-534 (November 2011)
6
steadily as time progresses. Studies have shown that within two years of application, half of the available formaldehyde has been released.
6.5 Other Chemicals and Wastes These materials include potentially toxic substances that may exist at the subject building. These may include water treatment chemicals associated with heating and cooling systems, heating fuels, building maintenance supplies such as paint and paint stripper, building cleaning supplies containing chemicals such as sodium hypochlorite and ammonium hydroxide and pesticides.
In line with the objectives of this assessment, efforts were made to identify whether substances were in use, are present for intended future use or have become obsolete. It is recommended that; 1) the health and safety information of those substances identified as having use at the subject facility be reviewed in order to ensure that they appropriately stored and handled and; 2) wastes be gathered at a central location, classified and disposed of in accordance with the applicable regulatory requirements.
Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Street, Brantford, Ontario E11-534
Appendix E
Laboratory Analysis Report
Asbestos • Lead • Environmental • Materials & Indoor Air Analysis
EMSL Analytical, Inc.200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Attn:
Proj: E11-534
EMSL Order: 041130050
Customer ID: CLEG25
Collected: 11/10/2011 12:00:00AM
Received: 11/14/2011
(905) 940-6161 Fax: Phone:
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via
EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0001
LAMINATED CEILING TILE-12X12 WITH SMALL AND LARGE HOLES
E11-534-1A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 95% 5%PLM Brown/White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0002
LAMINATED CEILING TILE-12X12 WITH SMALL AND LARGE HOLES
E11-534-1B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 95% 5%PLM Brown/White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0003
LAMINATED CEILING TILE-12X12 WITH SMALL AND LARGE HOLES
E11-534-1C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 90% 10%PLM Brown/White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0004
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-2A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 5% 95% <0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0005
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-2B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100% <0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0006
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-2C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100% <0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct Green
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0007
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-2D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100% <0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct Gray
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 1 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0008
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-2E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 10% 90%PLM Tan None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0009
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-2F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100% <0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct Tan
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0010
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-2G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 10% 90% <0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0011
RIGID BLACK LINER
E11-534-3A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 88% 12% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0012
RIGID BLACK LINER
E11-534-3B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 88% 12% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0013
RIGID BLACK LINER
E11-534-3C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 82% 18% ChrysotilePLM Brown
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0014
AIR-CELL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-4A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 75% 25% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0015
AIR-CELL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-4B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 75% 25% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0016
AIR-CELL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-4C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 65% 35% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 2 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0017
PARGING CEMENT MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-5A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 70% 30% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0018
PARGING CEMENT MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-5B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 70% 30% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0019
PARGING CEMENT MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-5C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 75% 25% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0020
WHITE JOINT FILLER
E11-534-6A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 95% 5% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0021
WHITE JOINT FILLER
E11-534-6B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 95% 5% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0022
WHITE JOINT FILLER
E11-534-6C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM Beige
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0023
BLACK ROOFING MATERIAL
E11-534-7A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 15% 85%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0024
BLACK ROOFING MATERIAL
E11-534-7B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 15% 85%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0025
BLACK ROOFING MATERIAL
E11-534-7C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 30% 70%PLM Black None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 3 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0026
BLACK ROOFING MATERIAL
E11-534-7D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 60% 40%PLM Brown/Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0027
BLACK ROOFING MATERIAL
E11-534-7E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 50% 50%PLM Brown None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0028
BLACK ROOFING MATERIAL
E11-534-7F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 10% 90%PLM Brown None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0029
BLACK ROOFING MATERIAL
E11-534-7G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 15% 85%PLM Brown None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0030
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-8A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100% <0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0031
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-8B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0032
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-8C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0033
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-8D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0034
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-8E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Tan None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 4 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0035
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-8F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 5% 95%PLM Tan None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0036
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-8G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray/Tan None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0037
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-9A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0038
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-9B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0039
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-9C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0040
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-9D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0041
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-9E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0042
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-9F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 5% 95%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0043
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-9G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 5% 95%PLM Gray None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 5 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0044
GREY CEMENT BOARD
E11-534-10A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 80% 20% ChrysotilePLM Gray/Green
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0045
GREY CEMENT BOARD
E11-534-10B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 75% 25% ChrysotilePLM Gray/Green
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0046
GREY CEMENT BOARD
E11-534-10C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 80% 20% ChrysotilePLM Gray/Green
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0047
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-11A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0048
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-11B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0049
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-11C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0050
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-11D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0051
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-11E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0052
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-11F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Tan None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 6 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0053
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-11G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0054
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-12A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0055
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-12B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0056
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-12C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0057
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-12D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0058
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-12E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0059
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-12F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0060
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-12G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0061
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-13A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 7 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0062
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-13B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0063
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-13C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0064
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-13D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0065
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-13E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0066
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-13F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0067
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-13G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0068
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-14A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Various None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0069
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-14B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Various None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0070
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-14C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 5% 95% <0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct Gray
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 8 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0071
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-14D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Various None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0072
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-14E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 10% 88% 2% ChrysotilePLM Gray material is different from the rest in HA
group
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0073
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-14F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Gray/Cream material is different from the rest in HA
group
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0074
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-14G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 10% 88% 2% ChrysotilePLM Gray material is different from the rest in HA
group
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0075
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-15A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100% <0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct Gray/White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0076
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-15B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100% <0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct Gray/White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0077
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-15C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray/White Recommend TEMNone Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0078
WHITE PIPE WRAP MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-16A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 70% 30% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0079
WHITE PIPE WRAP MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-16B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 70% 30% ChrysotilePLM White
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 9 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0080
WHITE PIPE WRAP MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-16C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 60% 40% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0081
MAG-BLOCK MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-17A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 70% 30% AmositePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0082
MAG-BLOCK MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-17B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 70% 30% AmositePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0083
MAG-BLOCK MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-17C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 80% 20% AmositePLM Tan
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0084
CEMENT WALL BOARD
E11-534-18A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 80% 20% ChrysotilePLM Gray/Green
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0085
CEMENT WALL BOARD
E11-534-18B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 80% 20% ChrysotilePLM Gray/Green
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0086
CEMENT WALL BOARD
E11-534-18C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 85% 15% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0087
BLACK ROOFING MATERIALS
E11-534-19A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0088
BLACK ROOFING MATERIALS
E11-534-19B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Black
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 10 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0089
BLACK ROOFING MATERIALS
E11-534-19C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 96% 4% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0090
BLACK ROOFING MATERIALS
E11-534-19D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0091
BLACK ROOFING MATERIALS
E11-534-19E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0092
BLACK ROOFING MATERIALS
E11-534-19F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0093
BLACK ROOFING MATERIALS
E11-534-19G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 30% 70%PLM Black Sample appears different from others in
group.None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0094
ANTI-SWEAT MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-20A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 95% 5%PLM Brown None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0095
ANTI-SWEAT MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-20B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 95% 5%PLM Brown None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0096
ANTI-SWEAT MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-20C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 85% 15%PLM Brown/Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0097
WHITE FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-21A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 75% 25%PLM Tan None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 11 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0098
WHITE FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-21B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 75% 25%PLM Tan None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0099
WHITE FLEXIBLE SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-21C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 60% 40%PLM Tan None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0100
AIR-CELL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-22A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 70% 30% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0101
AIR-CELL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-22B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 70% 30% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0102
AIR-CELL MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-22C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 65% 35% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0103
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-23A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 99.75% 0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0104
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-23B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100% <0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0105
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-23C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0106
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X2 WITH PINHOLES AND HOLES
E11-534-24A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 80% 20%PLM Gray/White None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 12 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0107
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X2 WITH PINHOLES AND HOLES
E11-534-24B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 80% 20%PLM Gray/White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0108
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X2 WITH PINHOLES AND HOLES
E11-534-24C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 90% 10%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0109
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X4 WITH A TEXTURED FINISH
E11-534-25A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 95% 5%PLM Brown None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0110
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X4 WITH A TEXTURED FINISH
E11-534-25B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 95% 5%PLM Brown None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0111
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X4 WITH A TEXTURED FINISH
E11-534-25C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 90% 10%PLM Tan/White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0112
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-26A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Various suggest temNone Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0113
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-26B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM Various None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0114
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-26C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM White/Cream sample is different from rest in HA group
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0115
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-27A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 13 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0116
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-27B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0117
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-27C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0118
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-28A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 100% <0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct White/Green
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0119
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-28B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 0% 99.75% 0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct White sample differs from previous
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0120
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-28C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Gray/Green
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0121
BLACK SHINGLES
E11-534-29A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 20% 80%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0122
BLACK SHINGLES
E11-534-29B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 20% 80%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0123
BLACK SHINGLES
E11-534-29C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 25% 75%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0124
BROWN SHINGLES
E11-534-30A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 15% 85%PLM Red/Black None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 14 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0125
BROWN SHINGLES
E11-534-30B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 15% 85%PLM Red/Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0126
BROWN SHINGLES
E11-534-30C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 80%PLM Red/Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0127
BLACK ROOFING FELT
E11-534-31A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 30% 70%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0128
BLACK ROOFING FELT
E11-534-31B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/14/2011 30% 70%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0129
BLACK ROOFING FELT
E11-534-31C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 80%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0130
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-32A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0131
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-32B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Tan None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0132
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-32C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/16/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0133
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-33A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Tan
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 15 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0134
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-33B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Tan
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0135
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-33C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/16/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Tan
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0136
LAMINATED CEILING TILE-16X16 GREEN
E11-534-34A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 95% 5%PLM Brown/Green None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0137
LAMINATED CEILING TILE-16X16 GREEN
E11-534-34B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 95% 5%PLM Brown/Green None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0138
LAMINATED CEILING TILE-16X16 GREEN
E11-534-34C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/16/2011 90% 10%PLM Brown None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0139
BROWN CAULKING
E11-534-35A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0140
BROWN CAULKING
E11-534-35B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0141
BROWN CAULKING
E11-534-35C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 8% 90% 2% ChrysotilePLM Brown
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0142
VINYL SHEET FLOORING-FALSE 12X12 GREY AND BROWN CERAMIC
E11-534-36A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 80%PLM Tan None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 16 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0143
VINYL SHEET FLOORING-FALSE 12X12 GREY AND BROWN CERAMIC
E11-534-36B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 80%PLM Tan None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0144
VINYL SHEET FLOORING-FALSE 12X12 GREY AND BROWN CERAMIC
E11-534-36C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 25% 75%PLM Brown/Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0145
GREEN SHINGLES
E11-534-37A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 80%PLM Black/Green None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0146
GREEN SHINGLES
E11-534-37B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 80%PLM Black/Green None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0147
GREEN SHINGLES
E11-534-37C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 25% 75%PLM Black/Green None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0148
PLASTER
E11-534-38A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray/Tan None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0149
PLASTER
E11-534-38B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray/Tan None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0150
PLASTER
E11-534-38C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Tan None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0151
VINYL FLOOR TILES-12X12 GREY
E11-534-39A-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM Tan
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 17 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0151A
VINYL FLOOR TILES-12X12 GREY
E11-534-39A-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 95% 5% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0152
VINYL FLOOR TILES-12X12 GREY
E11-534-39B-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 96% 4% ChrysotilePLM Tan
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0152A
VINYL FLOOR TILES-12X12 GREY
E11-534-39B-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 95% 5% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0153
VINYL FLOOR TILES-12X12 GREY
E11-534-39C-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM Tan
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0153A
VINYL FLOOR TILES-12X12 GREY
E11-534-39C-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 96% 4% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0154
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BROWN, LIGHT BROWN, RUST AND WHITE
E11-534-40A-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 96% 4% ChrysotilePLM Brown/Tan
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0154A
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BROWN, LIGHT BROWN, RUST AND WHITE
E11-534-40A-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0155
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BROWN, LIGHT BROWN, RUST AND WHITE
E11-534-40B-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM Brown/Tan
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0155A
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BROWN, LIGHT BROWN, RUST AND WHITE
E11-534-40B-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Black Mastic appeared different than sample 40A
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 18 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0156
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BROWN, LIGHT BROWN, RUST AND WHITE
E11-534-40C-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM Brown/Red
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0156A
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BROWN, LIGHT BROWN, RUST AND WHITE
E11-534-40C-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 96% 4% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0157
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-41A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0158
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-41B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0159
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-41C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0160
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-41D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 96% 4% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0161
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-41E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0162
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-41F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0163
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-41G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 96% 4% ChrysotilePLM White
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 19 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0164
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-41H
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0165
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X4 HOLES AND LONG SHARP FISSURES
E11-534-42A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 90% 10%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0166
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X4 HOLES AND LONG SHARP FISSURES
E11-534-42B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 95% 5%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0167
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X4 HOLES AND LONG SHARP FISSURES
E11-534-42C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 90% 10%PLM Gray/White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0168
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BEIGE WITH THIN BROWN STREAKS
E11-534-43A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM Tan
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0169
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BEIGE WITH THIN BROWN STREAKS
E11-534-43B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 96% 4% ChrysotilePLM Tan
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0170
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BEIGE WITH THIN BROWN STREAKS
E11-534-43C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 95% 5% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0171
BLACK MASTIC
E11-534-44A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 95% 5% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0172
BLACK MASTIC
E11-534-44B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 95% 5% ChrysotilePLM Black
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 20 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0173
BLACK MASTIC
E11-534-44C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 95% 5% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0174
WHITE HEAT SHIELD
E11-534-45A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 60% 15% 25% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0175
WHITE HEAT SHIELD
E11-534-45B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 65% 5% 30% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0176
WHITE HEAT SHIELD
E11-534-45C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 50% 25% 25% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0177
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 WHITE WITH BLACK STREAKS
E11-534-46A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM Tan
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0178
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 WHITE WITH BLACK STREAKS
E11-534-46B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM Tan
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0179
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 WHITE WITH BLACK STREAKS
E11-534-46C-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 96% 4% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0179A
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 WHITE WITH BLACK STREAKS
E11-534-46C-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0180
WHITE TAPE
E11-534-47A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray/Tan None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 21 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0181
WHITE TAPE
E11-534-47B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray/Tan None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0182
WHITE TAPE
E11-534-47C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 15% 85%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0183
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BLUE WITH GREY AND WHITE STREAKS
E11-534-48A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Blue
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0184
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BLUE WITH GREY AND WHITE STREAKS
E11-534-48B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Blue
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0185
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BLUE WITH GREY AND WHITE STREAKS
E11-534-48C-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Blue
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0185A
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BLUE WITH GREY AND WHITE STREAKS
E11-534-48C-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0186
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BEIGE WITH FINE BROWN STREAKS
E11-534-49A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Beige
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0187
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BEIGE WITH FINE BROWN STREAKS
E11-534-49B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM Beige
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0188
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BEIGE WITH FINE BROWN STREAKS
E11-534-49C-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM Beige
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 22 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0188A
VINYL FLOOR TILE-12X12 BEIGE WITH FINE BROWN STREAKS
E11-534-49C-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0189
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X2 PINHOLES AND LONG BROAD FISSURES
E11-534-50A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 85% 15%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0190
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X2 PINHOLES AND LONG BROAD FISSURES
E11-534-50B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 88% 12%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0191
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X2 PINHOLES AND LONG BROAD FISSURES
E11-534-50C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 85% 15%PLM Gray/White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0192
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X2 PINHOLES AND FISSURES
E11-534-51A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 90% 10%PLM Tan/White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0193
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X2 PINHOLES AND FISSURES
E11-534-51B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 90% 10%PLM Tan/White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0194
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X2 PINHOLES AND FISSURES
E11-534-51C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 95% 5%PLM Brown None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0195
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9X9 GREY WITH BROWN STREAKS
E11-534-52A-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0195A
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9X9 GREY WITH BROWN STREAKS
E11-534-52A-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Black None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 23 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0196
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9X9 GREY WITH BROWN STREAKS
E11-534-52B-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0196A
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9X9 GREY WITH BROWN STREAKS
E11-534-52B-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0197
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9X9 GREY WITH BROWN STREAKS
E11-534-52C-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0197A
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9X9 GREY WITH BROWN STREAKS
E11-534-52C-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0198
GREY TEXTURED MATERIAL
E11-534-53A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0199
GREY TEXTURED MATERIAL
E11-534-53B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0200
GREY TEXTURED MATERIAL
E11-534-53C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0201
BLACK ROOFING MATERIALS
E11-534-54A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 80%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0202
BLACK ROOFING MATERIALS
E11-534-54B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 80%PLM Black None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 24 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0203
BLACK ROOFING MATERIALS
E11-534-54C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 15% 85%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0204
BLACK ROOFING MATERIALS
E11-534-54D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 15% 85%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0205
BLACK ROOFING MATERIALS
E11-534-54E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 80%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0206
BLACK ROOFING MATERIALS
E11-534-54F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 80%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0207
BLACK ROOFING MATERIALS
E11-534-54G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/16/2011 10% 90%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0208
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-55A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0209
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-55B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0210
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-55C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0211
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X2 PINHOLES AND TEXTURED FISSURES
E11-534-56A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 90% 10%PLM Gray None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 25 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0212
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X2 PINHOLES AND TEXTURED FISSURES
E11-534-56B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 90% 10%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0213
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2X2 PINHOLES AND TEXTURED FISSURES
E11-534-56C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 80% 20%PLM Gray/White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0214
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-57A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0215
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-57B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0216
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-57C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 98% 2% ChrysotilePLM White
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0217
CEMENT WALL BOARD
E11-534-58A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 85% 15% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0218
CEMENT WALL BOARD
E11-534-58B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 80% 20% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0219
CEMENT WALL BOARD
E11-534-58C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 80% 20% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0220
GREY SEALANT
E11-534-59A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Black Recommend TEMNone Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 26 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0221
GREY SEALANT
E11-534-59B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Black Recommend TEMNone Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0222
GREY SEALANT
E11-534-59C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray/Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0223
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9X9 ORANGE
E11-534-60A-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 94% 6% ChrysotilePLM Brown
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0223A
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9X9 ORANGE
E11-534-60A-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0224
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9X9 ORANGE
E11-534-60B-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 95% 5% ChrysotilePLM Orange
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0224A
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9X9 ORANGE
E11-534-60B-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 96% 4% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0225
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9X9 ORANGE
E11-534-60C-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 96% 4% ChrysotilePLM Orange
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0225A
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9X9 ORANGE
E11-534-60C-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 96% 4% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0226
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-61A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 27 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0227
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-61B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0228
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-61C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0229
BLACK SHINGLES
E11-534-62A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 25% 75%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0230
BLACK SHINGLES
E11-534-62B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 80%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0231
BLACK SHINGLES
E11-534-62C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 80%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0232
BLACK FELT
E11-534-63A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 40% 60%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0233
BLACK FELT
E11-534-63B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 60% 40%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0234
BLACK FELT
E11-534-63C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 50% 50%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0235
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-64A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 28 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0236
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-64B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0237
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-64C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0238
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-64D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0239
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-64E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0240
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-64F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0241
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-64G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0242
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-65A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0243
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-65B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0244
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-65C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 29 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0245
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-65D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0246
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-65E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0247
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-65F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0248
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-65G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0249
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-66A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0250
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-66B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0251
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-66C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0252
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-66D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0253
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-66E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 30 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0254
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-66F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0255
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-66G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0256
GREY CAULKING
E11-534-67A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 90% 10% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0257
GREY CAULKING
E11-534-67B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 90% 10% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0258
GREY CAULKING
E11-534-67C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 85% 15% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0259
BLACK CAULKING
E11-534-68A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0260
BLACK CAULKING
E11-534-68B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0261
BLACK CAULKING
E11-534-68C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Brown/Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0262
BLACK ROOFING FELT
E11-534-69A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 77% 3% ChrysotilePLM Black
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 31 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0263
BLACK ROOFING FELT
E11-534-69B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 76% 4% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0264
BLACK ROOFING FELT
E11-534-69C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 35% 63% 2% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0265
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-70A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0266
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-70B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0267
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-70C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0268
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-71A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0269
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-71B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0270
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-71C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0271
BLACK SHINGLES
E11-534-72A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 80%PLM Black None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 32 of 34
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0272
BLACK SHINGLES
E11-534-72B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 80%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0273
BLACK SHINGLES
E11-534-72C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 20% 80%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0274
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-73A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Brown/Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0275
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-73B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0276
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-73C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0277
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-73D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0278
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-73E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0279
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-73F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130050-0280
GREY MORTAR
E11-534-73G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/15/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/16/2011 10:26AM Page 33 of 34
Asbestos • Lead • Environmental • Materials & Indoor Air Analysis
EMSL Analytical, Inc.200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Attn:
Proj: E11-534
EMSL Order: 041130801
Customer ID: CLEG25
Collected: 11/18/2011 12:00:00AM
Received: 11/22/2011
(905) 940-6161 Fax: Phone:
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via
EPA600/R-93/116 MethodClient Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0001
CEMENT BOARD
E11-534-74A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 80% 20% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0002
CEMENT BOARD
E11-534-74B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011PLM Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0003
CEMENT BOARD
E11-534-74C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011PLM Brown/White Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0004
WHITE MECHANICAL SYSTEM INSULATION
E11-534-75A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 85% 15% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0005
WHITE MECHANICAL SYSTEM INSULATION
E11-534-75B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011PLM Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0006
WHITE MECHANICAL SYSTEM INSULATION
E11-534-75C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011PLM Brown/Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0007
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-76A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 1 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0008
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-76B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0009
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-76C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0010
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-76D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0011
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-76E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0012
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-76F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 5% 95%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0013
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-76G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 10% 90%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0014
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-77A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100% <0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0015
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-77B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 99.75% 0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0016
WHITE CAULKING
E11-534-77C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 99.50% 0.50% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct Various
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 2 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0017
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-78A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0018
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-78B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0019
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-78C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0020
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-78D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0021
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-78E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 5% 95%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0022
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-79A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0023
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-79B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0024
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-79C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0025
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-79D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 3 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0026
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-79E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0027
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-79F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 10% 90%PLM Various None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0028
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-79G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 10% 90%PLM Various None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0029
PARGING CEMENT
E11-534-80A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 60% 40% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0030
PARGING CEMENT
E11-534-80B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011PLM Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0031
PARGING CEMENT
E11-534-80C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011PLM Gray/Black Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0032
GASKET
E11-534-81A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 60% 40%PLM Various Suggest TEMNone Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0033
GASKET
E11-534-81B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Various Suggest TEMNone Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0034
GASKET
E11-534-81C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 65% 35%PLM Brown/Red/Silver Suggest TEMNone Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 4 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0035
BEIGE INSULATION
E11-534-82A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 96% 4% AmositePLM Tan
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0036
BEIGE INSULATION
E11-534-82B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011PLM Tan Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0037
BEIGE INSULATION
E11-534-82C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011PLM Tan Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0038
WHITE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-83A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 55% 45% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0039
WHITE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-83B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011PLM Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0040
WHITE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS INSULATION
E11-534-83C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011PLM Gray Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0041
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-84A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0042
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-84B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0043
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-84C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM Tan/White None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 5 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0044
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-85A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0045
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-85B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0046
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-85C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0047
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-85D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0048
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-85E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0049
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-85F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0050
DRYWALL JOINT COMPOUND
E11-534-85G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0051
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9"X9" BEIGE/BROWN
E11-534-86A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 15% 85%PLM Gray suggest temNone Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0052
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9"X9" BEIGE/BROWN
E11-534-86B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 10% 90%PLM Gray/Green suggest temNone Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 6 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0053
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9"X9" BEIGE/BROWN
E11-534-86C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 20% 80%PLM Brown/Green None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0054
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2'X4' PINHOLES, HOLES, AND LONG FISSURES
E11-534-87A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 80% 20%PLM Gray/White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0055
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2'X4' PINHOLES, HOLES, AND LONG FISSURES
E11-534-87B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 80% 20%PLM Gray/White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0056
SUSPENDED CEILING TILE-2'X4' PINHOLES, HOLES, AND LONG FISSURES
E11-534-87C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 85% 15%PLM Gray/White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0057
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-88A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0058
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-88B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0059
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-88C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0060
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-88D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0061
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-88E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 7 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0062
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-88F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray/White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0063
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-88G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0064
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-89A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0065
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-89B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0066
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-89C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0067
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-89D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0068
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-89E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0069
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-89F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0070
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-89G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 8 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0071
GREEN CAULKING
E11-534-90A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Green sample differs from nextNone Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0072
GREEN CAULKING
E11-534-90B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100% <0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct Green
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0073
GREEN CAULKING
E11-534-90C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM Green None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0074
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-91A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0075
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-91B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0076
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-91C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0077
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-91D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0078
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-91E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0079
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-91F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 9 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0080
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-91G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0081
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-92A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0082
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-92B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0083
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-92C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0084
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-92D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0085
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-92E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0086
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-92F
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray/White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0087
GREY BRICK MORTAR
E11-534-92G
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0088
WHITE SEALANT
E11-534-93A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 10% 90%PLM Gray/Black None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 10 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0089
WHITE SEALANT
E11-534-93B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 10% 90%PLM Gray/Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0090
WHITE SEALANT
E11-534-93C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0091
DARK BROWN SHINGLES
E11-534-94A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 30% 70%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0092
DARK BROWN SHINGLES
E11-534-94B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 30% 70%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0093
DARK BROWN SHINGLES
E11-534-94C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 30% 70%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0094
LIGHT BROWN SHINGLES
E11-534-95A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 30% 70%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0095
LIGHT BROWN SHINGLES
E11-534-95B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 30% 70%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0096
LIGHT BROWN SHINGLES
E11-534-95C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 25% 75%PLM Black None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0097
TEXTURE COAT
E11-534-96A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Yellow None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 11 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0098
TEXTURE COAT
E11-534-96B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Yellow None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0099
TEXTURE COAT
E11-534-96C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Yellow None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0100
TEXTURE COAT
E11-534-96D
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100% <0.25% Chrysotile400 PLM Pt Ct Various
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0101
TEXTURE COAT
E11-534-96E
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 10% 90%PLM Various None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0102
PLASTER
E11-534-97A-Skim Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0102A
PLASTER
E11-534-97A-Rough Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 3% 97%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0103
PLASTER
E11-534-97B-Skim Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0103A
PLASTER
E11-534-97B-Rough Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 3% 97%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0104
PLASTER
E11-534-97C-Skim Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 12 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0104A
PLASTER
E11-534-97C-Rough Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0105
PLASTER
E11-534-97D-Rough Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0105A
PLASTER
E11-534-97D-Skim Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0106
PLASTER
E11-534-97E-Rough Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0106A
PLASTER
E11-534-97E-Skim Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0107
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9"X9" GREEN
E11-534-98A-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 92% 8% ChrysotilePLM Green
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0107A
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9"X9" GREEN
E11-534-98A-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011 0% 94% 6% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0108
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9"X9" GREEN
E11-534-98B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/22/2011PLM Green Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0109
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9"X9" GREEN
E11-534-98C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011PLM Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 13 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0110
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9"X9" WHITE
E11-534-99A-Floor Tile
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 97% 3% ChrysotilePLM Gray
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0110A
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9"X9" WHITE
E11-534-99A-Mastic
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 94% 6% ChrysotilePLM Gray/Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0111
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9"X9" WHITE
E11-534-99B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011PLM Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0112
VINYL FLOOR TILE-9"X9" WHITE
E11-534-99C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011PLM Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0113
BLACK MASTIC
E11-534-100A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 85% 15% ChrysotilePLM Black
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0114
BLACK MASTIC
E11-534-100B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011PLM Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0115
BLACK MASTIC
E11-534-100C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011PLM Stop Positive (Not Analyzed)
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0116
PLASTER
E11-534-101A-Plaster
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 2% 98%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0116A
PLASTER
E11-534-101A-Backing
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 85% 15%PLM Brown None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 14 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0117
PLASTER
E11-534-101B-Skim Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0117A
PLASTER
E11-534-101B-Base Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 2% 98%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0117B
PLASTER
E11-534-101B-Backing
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 90% 10%PLM Brown None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0118
PLASTER
E11-534-101C-Skim Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0118A
PLASTER
E11-534-101C-Base Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 2% 98%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0118B
PLASTER
E11-534-101C-Backing
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 80% 20%PLM Brown None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0119
PLASTER
E11-534-101D-Skim Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0119A
PLASTER
E11-534-101D-Base Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 2% 98%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0119B
PLASTER
E11-534-101D-Backing
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 85% 15%PLM Brown None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 15 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0120
PLASTER
E11-534-101E-Skim Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM Tan None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0120A
PLASTER
E11-534-101E-Base Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 2% 98%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0120B
PLASTER
E11-534-101E-Backing
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 85% 15%PLM Brown None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0121
PLASTER
E11-534-101F-Skim Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0121A
PLASTER
E11-534-101F-Base Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 2% 98%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0121B
PLASTER
E11-534-101F-Backing
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 80% 20%PLM Brown None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0122
PLASTER
E11-534-101G-Skim Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 0% 100%PLM White None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0122A
PLASTER
E11-534-101G-Base Coat
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 2% 98%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0122B
PLASTER
E11-534-101G-Backing
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 80% 20%PLM Brown None Detected
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 16 of 17
EMSL Analytical, Inc.
200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077
Phone: (800) 220-3675 Fax: (856) 786-5974 Web: http://www.emsl.com Email:cinnasblab@EMSL.com
Proj:
Attn:
E11-534
Ryan Bayard
Cole Engineering Group Ltd.
70 Valleywood drive
Markham, ON L3R 4T5
Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials for Ontario Regulation 278/05 via EPA600/R-93/116 Method
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0123
SUSPENDEND CEILING TILE-2"X4" HOLES AND LARGE FISSURES
E11-534-102A
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 80% 20%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0124
SUSPENDEND CEILING TILE-2"X4" HOLES AND LARGE FISSURES
E11-534-102B
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 80% 20%PLM Gray None Detected
Client Sample ID:
Sample Description:
Lab Sample ID: 041130801-0125
SUSPENDEND CEILING TILE-2"X4" HOLES AND LARGE FISSURES
E11-534-102C
DateTEST Non-Fibrous Asbestos CommentColor Fibrous
Non-AsbestosAnalyzed
11/23/2011 80% 20%PLM Gray None Detected
Analyst(s)
Stephen Siegel, CIH, Laboratory Manager
or other Approved Signatory
Adam Gart PLM (4)
Christine Hatter PLM (11)
400 PLM Pt Ct (1)
Johnny Yu PLM (39)
400 PLM Pt Ct (1)
Naadira Carter PLM (70)
400 PLM Pt Ct (3)
Any questions please contact Steve Siegel.
None Detected = <0.5%. EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL.
EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. Samples received in good condition unless
otherwise noted. This report must not be used to claim product endorsement by NVLAP of any agency of the U.S. Government.
Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code 101048-0, AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab 100194, NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036
Initial report from: 11/23/201113:40:37
Test Report:EPAMultiTests-7.24.4A Printed: 11/23/2011 01:40PM Page 17 of 17
Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
347 Greenwich and 66 Mohawk Street, Brantford, Ontario E11-534
Appendix F
Site Photographs
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Designated Substances and Hazardous Materials Survey Report
Photo 1: View of Building 1A, looking northwest, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 2: View of Building 1B, looking northwest, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 3: View of Building 2, looking east, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 4: View of Building 3A, looking west, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 5: View of the Cockshutt Building and Time Keepers Building, looking north, located at 66 Mohawk Street.
Photo 6: View of Building 3B‐1, looking north, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 7: View of Building 3B‐2, looking west, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 8: View of Building 3B‐3, looking northwest, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 9: View of building 3B‐4, looking northwest, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 10: View of Building 3B‐5, looking east, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 11: View of Building 3B‐6, looking south, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 12: View of Building 4 (Garage), looking southwest, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 13: View of Building 5A‐2, looking north, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 14: View of Building 5B, looking southeast, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 15: View of Building 5A‐1, looking southwest, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 16: View of Building 6A‐1, looking east, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 17: View of Building 6A‐2, looking northeast, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 18: View of Building 6B‐1, looking west, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 19: View of Building 6B‐2 (Administration Building), looking south, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 20: View of Building 8, looking east, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 21: View of Building 9, looking east, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 22: View of Building 10, looking northeast, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 23: View of Building 11, looking north, located at 347 Greenwich Street.
Photo 24: View of pipe straights with damaged asbestos‐containing air‐cell MSI on the 3rd floor of Building 1B (Cole Sample E11‐534‐4A).
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 25: View of asbestos‐containing air‐cell MSI debris on the floor of the 3rd floor open area in Building 1B.
Photo 26: View of asbestos‐containing air‐cell MSI debris on the floor of the 1st floor open area in Building 1B.
Photo 27: View of pipe straight on the 1st floor of Building 2 with damaged asbestos‐containing air‐cell MSI.
Photo 28: View of exterior pipe straight between Buildings 1B and 2 with damaged asbestos‐containing air‐cell MSI.
Photo 29: View of a pipe straight with damaged asbestos‐containing air‐cell MSI on the 1st floor of Building 3A (CEG Sample E11‐534‐16A).
Photo 30: View of a pipe straight with asbestos‐containing mag‐block MSI in the washroom of Building 3C (CEG Sample E11‐534‐17A).
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 31: View of a pipe straight with damaged asbestos‐containing air‐cell MSI in Building 3C.
Photo 32: View of a pipe straight with damaged asbestos‐containing air‐cell MSI in Building 3C.
Photo 33: View of asbestos‐containing air‐cell MSI on the floor of Building 3C.
Photo 34: View of a pipe straight with damaged asbestos‐containing air‐cell MSI in Building 3B‐1 (CEG Sample E11‐534‐22A).
Photo 35: View of asbestos‐containing air‐cell MSI debris on the floor of Building 3B‐1.
Photo 36: View of a pipe straight with damaged asbestos‐containing air‐cell MSI in Building 3B‐2.
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 37: View of a pipe straight with damaged asbestos‐containing air‐cell MSI in Building 4.
Photo 38: View of a pipe straight with damaged asbestos‐containing mag‐block MSI above a ceiling in Building 5B.
Photo 39: View of asbestos‐containing mag‐block MSI debris on the floor of the change room in Building 5B.
Photo 40: View of a pipe straight with damaged air‐cell MSI in the 2nd floor locker room of Building 6A‐1.
Photo 41: View of pipe fittings with asbestos‐containing parging cement MSI in Building 6B (CEG Sample E11‐534‐5A).
Photo 42: View of pipe fittings with asbestos‐containing parging cement MSI in Building 4.
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 43: View of asbestos‐containing mag‐block MSI debris on the floor of the Boiler Room in Building 3B‐3.
Photo 44: View of damaged asbestos‐containing white pipe wrap MSI on a pipe straight in Building 3A (CEG sample E11‐534‐16A).
Photo 45: View of damaged asbestos‐containing white MSI on a pipe straight in an outbuilding of Building 6A‐2 (CEG sample E11‐534‐75A).
Photo 46: View of damaged asbestos‐containing parging cement MSI on a tank in the Boiler Room of Building 3B‐3 (CEG sample E11‐534‐80A).
Photo 47: View of asbestos‐containing beige insulation in a hatch on the boiler in the Boiler Room of Building 3B‐3 (CEG sample E11‐534‐82A).
Photo 48: View of damaged asbestos‐containing white MSI on a tank in the boiler room of Building 3B‐3 (CEG sample E11‐534‐83A).
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 49: View of the damaged asbestos‐containing rigid black liner in a toilet bowl on the 4th floor of Building 1B (CEG sample E11‐534‐3A).
Photo 50: View of the wall of the 2nd floor east office area in Building 1B with asbestos‐containing white joint filler (CEG sample E11‐524‐6A).
Photo 51: View of damaged asbestos‐containing cement panels in the west vacant area of Building 2 (CEG sample E11‐534‐10A).
Photo 52: View of damaged asbestos‐containing cement panels in the central section of Building 3A (CEG sample E11‐534‐18A).
Photo 53: View of asbestos‐containing cement panels on the wall of the 3rd floor storage area in Building 6B‐1 (CEG sample E11‐534‐58A).
Photo 54: View of damaged asbestos‐containing cement panels on the exterior wall of Building 6A‐2 (CEG sample E11‐534‐74A).
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 55: View of asbestos‐containing cement panels on the exterior wall of Building 5B.
Photo 56: View of the west exterior wall of Building 4 (Garage) with damaged asbestos‐containing cement panels.
Photo 57: View of the east wall of Building 5A‐2 with damaged asbestos‐containing cement panels.
Photo 58: View of the west exterior wall of Building 9 with asbestos‐containing cement panels.
Photo 59: View of the interior of a piece of machinery within Building 3C (Covered Corridor) with asbestos‐containing cement panels.
Photo 60: View of damaged asbestos‐containing white caulking on a window frame in Building 3A (CEG sample E11‐534‐14E).
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 61: View of damaged asbestos‐containing white caulking on a window frame in Building 4 (Garage) (CEG sample E11‐534‐26C).
Photo 62: View of damaged asbestos‐containing white caulking on a window frame in Building 3B‐2 (CEG sample E11‐534‐28C).
Photo 63: View of damaged asbestos‐containing white caulking on a window frame in Building 6B‐1 (CEG sample E11‐534‐57A).
Photo 64: View of damaged asbestos‐containing white caulking on an exterior window frame of Building 6A‐1 (CEG sample E11‐534‐77C).
Photo 65: View of asbestos‐containing roofing materials on the floor of Building 3C (Covered Corridor) (CEG sample E11‐534‐19A).
Photo 66: View of the roofing debris from Building 9 with damaged asbestos‐containing roofing felt (CEG sample E11‐534‐67A).
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 67: View of damaged drywall with asbestos‐containing joint compound in the washroom of Building 5B (CEG sample E11‐534‐33A).
Photo 68: View of the 2nd floor office area of Building 6B‐2 with asbestos‐containing drywall joint compound (CEG sample E11‐534‐41A).
Photo 69: View of damaged asbestos‐containing brown caulking on a window frame in Building 5B (CEG sample E11‐534‐35A).
Photo 70: View of an asbestos‐containing heat shield in a light fixture in Building 6B‐2 (CEG sample E11‐534‐45A).
Photo 71: View of damaged asbestos‐containing grey caulking between the east and west portions of Building 9 (CEG sample E11‐534‐67A).
Photo 72: View of damaged asbestos‐containing VFTs in the southwest vestibule of Building 6A‐1 (CEG sample E11‐534‐39A).
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 73: View of asbestos‐containing VFTs in the shower / locker area of Building 6A‐1 (CEG sample E11‐534‐40A).
Photo 74: View of damaged asbestos‐containing VFTs in the 2nd floor kitchen of Building 6B‐2 (CEG sample E11‐534‐43A).
Photo 75: View of asbestos‐containing black mastic in the 2nd floor kitchen of Building 6B‐2 (CEG sample E11‐534‐44A).
Photo 76: View of asbestos‐containing VFTs below the carpet in the 2nd floor office area of Building 6B‐2 (CEG sample E11‐534‐46A).
Photo 77: View of damaged asbestos‐containing VFTs on the floor of the 2nd floor men’s washroom in Building 6B‐2 (CEG sample E11‐534‐48A).
Photo 78: View of asbestos‐containing VFTs on the floor of the 2nd floor women’s washroom in Building 6B‐2 (CEG sample E11‐534‐49A).
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 79: View of damaged asbestos‐containing VFTs in the 1st floor janitor’s closet of Building 6B‐2 (CEG sample E11‐534‐52A).
Photo 80: View of damaged asbestos‐containing VFTs on the floor of the Time keepers Building (CEG samples E11‐534‐98A and E11‐534‐99A).
Photo 81: View of asbestos‐containing black mastic on the floor of the Time Keepers Building (CEG sample E11‐534‐100A).
Photo 82: View of the north entryway of the central section of Building 3A with lead‐containing yellow paint (CEG XRF spot test E11‐534‐L70).
Photo 83: View of the north wall of the eastern section of Building 3C with lead‐containing orange paint (CEG XRF spot test E11‐534‐L79).
Photo 84: View of the window frame of the Time Keepers Building with lead‐containing white paint (CEG XRF spot test E11‐534‐L213).
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 85: View of the central stairwell wall in the Cockshutt Building with lead‐containing off‐white paint (CEG XRF spot test E11‐534‐L221).
Photo 86: Example of lead‐containing paint debris on the floor of the far east section of Building 3A.
Photo 87: Example of flaking and peeling lead‐containing orange paint in the western section of Building 3C.
Photo 88: Example of flaking and peeling lead‐containing beige paint in the central section of Building 3A.
Photo 89: Example of peeling and flaking lead‐containing green paint in the central stairwell of Building 6A‐2.
Photo 90: Example of flaking and peeling lead‐containing black paint on the ceiling of the 2nd floor locker room in Building 6A‐2.
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 91: View of a mercury‐containing thermostat on the 2nd floor of Building 6B‐2.
Photo 92: View of a mercury‐containing thermostat on the 1st floor in Building 6B‐1.
Photo 93: View of the Philips light ballast Cat. No. RQM‐2S40‐TPC with a label indicating that PCBs are not present.
Photo 94: View of the Advance Transformer Co. light ballast Cat. No. 7253C1‐NP with a label indicating that PCBs are not present.
Photo 95: View of the Canadian General Electric light ballast Cat. No. 17A240T suspected of containing PCBs.
Photo 96: View of Canadian General Electric light ballast Cat. No. 17A296T suspected of containing PCBs.
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 97: View of the Canadian General Electric light ballast Cat. No. 17A50A suspected of containing PCBs.
Photo 98: View of the Canadian General Electric light ballast Cat. No. 17A297TW suspected of containing PCBs.
Photo 99: View of the Canadian General Electric light ballast Cat. No. 17A295A suspected of containing PCBs.
Photo 100: View of the Universal light ballast Cat. No. 446‐LR‐TC‐P suspected of containing PCBs.
Photo 101: View of the Canadian General Electric light ballast Cat. No. 9510 suspected of containing PCBs.
Photo 102: View of the Canadian General Electric light ballast Cat. No. 15A286 suspected of containing PCBs.
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 103: View of the Ballastronix light ballast Cat. No. 570322 with a label indicating that PCBs are not present.
Photo 104: View of the Universal light ballast Cat. No. 805‐BR‐TC‐P suspected of containing PCBs.
Photo 105: View of the Canadian General Electric light ballast Cat. No. 17A240A suspected of containing PCBs.
Photo 106: View of the Sola Basic Limited light ballast Cat. No. 570‐302T suspected of containing PCBs.
Photo 107: Example of a light ballast label that is no longer legible. This ballast is assumed PCB‐containing.
Photo 108: Example of a light fixture were that ballast could not be accessed due to deterioration of the lighting fixture.
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 109: View of potentially hazardous materials being stored in Building 3B‐1.
Photo 110: View of stored compressed gas cylinders in Building 3B‐1.
Photo 111: View of potentially hazardous materials being stored in Building 5B.
Photo 112: View of potentially hazardous materials being stored in Building 6A‐1.
Photo 113: View of compressed gas cylinders on the floor of Building 2. Photo 114: View of potentially hazardous materials being stored in Building 6A‐2.
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 115: View of compressed gas cylinders on the floor of the Time Keepers Building.
Photo 116: View of the former PCB storage compound in Building 8.
Photo 117: View of asbestos waste bags being stored in the west office are of Building 5B.
Photo 118: View of the window mounted air‐conditioner that contains ODSs in Building 6B‐1.
Photo 119: View of the refrigerator in the west section of the Time Keepers Building that contains ODSs.
Photo 120: View of suspected mould growth on the walls and ceiling of the east office area in Building 5B.
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 121: View of suspected mould growth on the walls and ceilings of in the lean‐to of Building 3B‐1.
Photo 122: View of suspected mould growth on the walls and ceilings on the 1st floor of Building 2.
Photo 123: Example of the structural deterioration in Building 2 that prevented access to the upper floors.
Photo 124: Example of the structural deterioration in Building 3A that prevented access to the upper floors.
Photo 125: Example of the structural deterioration in Building 3A that prevented access to the upper floors.
Photo 126: Example of structural deterioration in Building 3B‐3 that prevented access to the upper floors.
Site Photographs ‐ DSHMS Greenwich Mohawk Brownfield’s Site – Vacant Buildings
Appendix F E11‐534
Photo 127: View of a cavity below the floor of Building 6A‐2 that prevented the full inspection of the building.
Photo 128: View of the structural deterioration of the floors on the 2nd floor of the Cockshutt Building that prevented its full inspection.
Photo 129: View of the structural deterioration of the central section of the Cockshutt Building that prevented its full inspection.
Photo 130: A view of the eastern section of Building 3B‐3 that has entirely collapsed.
Recommended