View
218
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
DOCTOR OF EDUCATION
CURRICULUM AND LEADERSHIP
Policies and Procedures
Office of COEHP Graduate Studies
Fall 2017
Revision 6/1/2017 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Overview 5
Admission Categories 5
Requirements for Doctoral Program Admission and Graduation 6
Requirements for Admission to Graduate School 6
Requirements for Admission to Pre-Degree Candidacy for the Doctor of Education
Degree in the College of Education and Health Professions 6
Requirements for Admission to Degree Candidacy for the Doctor of Education Degree 7
Requirements for Graduation 7
Course of Study 7
Table 1: Doctor of Education in Curriculum and Leadership Program of Study 8
Required Test Scores 9
Admission Application Deadlines 9
Admission Decisions 9
Requirements Related to Transfer of Courses from Other Programs 10
Residency Requirement and Time Limits 10
Independent Study 10
Appeals Process 10
Certification Options 11
Re-entry 11
Readmission 11
Orientation 11
Registration 11
Registration Holds/Restrictions 11
Registration Program Restriction 11
Academic Registration Hold 12
Course Enrollment Overload 12
Study Loads and Enrollment 12
Maximum Study Load 12
Revision 6/1/2017 3
Enrollment Status 12
Graduate Assistantships 12
Selected Academic Regulations 13
Transient Courses 13
Academic Standing 13
Academic Probation 13
Removal from Probation 13
Academic Exclusion 13
Reinstatement for the Doctor of Education Program 14
Process for Applying for Readmission Following Exclusion 14
Degree Completion/Graduation 14
Academic Misconduct 15
Grievance 15
Attendance 15
Administrative Withdrawal 15
Repetition of Courses 15
Graduation Procedures (Refer to CSU website and/or current CSU catalog) 15
University Library – Doctoral Library Assistance 16
Institutional Review Board (IRB) 16
Revision 6/1/2017 4
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Doctor of Education Program Checklist 17
Appendix B: Sample Program of Study 19
Appendix C: Doctoral Candidate Packet 25
Appendix D: Advisement Verification Form 31
Appendix E: Doctoral Dissertation Committee Appointment Form 32
Appendix F: Prospectus (Forms and Protocol) 33
Appendix G: Proposal (Forms, Rubric, and Protocol) 41
Appendix H: IRB Application 46
Appendix I: Dissertation Defense (Forms, Rubric, and Protocol) 50
Appendix: J Thesis Form (Submit to Library) 62
Appendix K: Submission of Final Dissertation 63
Appendix L: Petition for Appeal 65
Appendix M: Degree Progress Forms 66
Revision 6/1/2017 5
DOCTOR OF EDUCATION DEGREE IN CURRICULUM AND LEADERSHIP:
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROFESSIONS
OVERVIEW
With the present climate of accountability, there is a significant demand for educators among
administrative ranks and in the classroom who have a high degree of expertise in school improvement,
research, and professional learning. The Columbus State University College of Education and Health
Professions is committed to the development of educators with this level of expertise through the
implementation of a Doctor of Education in Curriculum and Leadership. This program is offered as a
cooperative effort through the Departments of Counseling, Foundations, and Leadership (CFL), Health,
Physical Education and Exercise Science (HPEX), and Teacher Education within the College of
Education and Health Professions (COEHP).
The development of professionals with the research skills necessary to improve student achievement in
schools is critical given the need for leadership frameworks, curriculum models, and instructional
practices that are supported by research. Each community, school system, and school is different in terms
of demographics, population, needs, and goals. Educators in different environments must be able to
identify practices, rigorously test those practices, and ascertain best practices to implement in a specific
setting.
A program of this scope is necessary in order to meet the challenges presented by the Columbus State
University mission regarding research and service to the community. It also includes the College of
Education and Health Profession’s mission in terms of developing the high level of proficiency, expertise,
and leadership consistent with the emerging needs of the communities served by Columbus State
University.
The mission of Columbus State University is “to promote educational, economic, social and cultural
growth in Georgia and beyond. The university is dedicated to excellence in teaching in a student-centered
environment, research and creative activities, service to the region and the state, and community
engagement through university-community partnerships.”
Admission Categories
Admission categories include Regular, Provisional, and Denied and are as follows:
Students admitted on the Provisional status must successfully complete departmental
requirements prior to completion of more than 25% of the degree requirements.
Students successfully fulfilling provisional requirements will be changed to regular
admission status.
If a student does not clear provisional expectations within the allotted time frame, he or she
will be removed from the program.
Students who have been admitted provisionally must achieve a grade point average of 3.25
within the first 9 semester hours of coursework prior to unrestricted continuation in the
area of study.
Pre-Degree Candidates who have not met the provisions of regular admission may not be
admitted to Degree Candidacy Status. A student can remain in the program with approval of the
Director of the Doctoral Program.
Revision 6/1/2017 6
REQUIREMENTS FOR DOCTORAL PROGRAM ADMISSION AND GRADUATION
Requirements listed below and are to be submitted for consideration to admission to Doctoral
Program:
Columbus State University Graduate Admissions
University Hall
4225 University Avenue
Columbus, GA 31907-5645
Admission Requirements
Applicant must hold at least a master’s degree from an accredited United States institution, or the
equivalent from an international institution.
Academic good standing at the institution last attended.
GPA of at least 3.5 on all graduate course work at an accredited United States institution in
fulfillment of the requirement for a graduate degree.
Satisfactory scores on the general portion (Quantitative Reasoning and Verbal Reasoning) of the
Revised Graduate Record Exam (GRE) with a satisfactory score on the Analytical Writing
component.
Four (4) years of experience in a school setting or in a leadership role in the private sector.
No criminal record or discharge from the armed services that would prevent recommendation for
related teacher, counseling or leadership certifications.
The successful applicant must not have been removed from or denied admittance to a teacher
education program or student teaching.
Requirements for Admission to Pre-Degree Candidacy (PDC) for the Doctor of Education Degree
in the College of Education and Health Professions. The following (1-7) should be submitted to the
Office of Admissions – University Hall – Main Campus.
Office of Admissions
University Hall
4225 University Avenue
Columbus, GA 31907-5645
1. Resume - Include previous education, related professional employment/experiences, professional
service/contributions, and special recognitions.
2. Two (2) Letters of Reference –One letter of reference should be from a building level administrator
(principal) or a direct supervisor if you are in a system level position or in the corporate sector.
Additional references may be provided if desired. (Use “Letter of Recommendation Form”
provided). (Appendix C)
3. Background Check Required. (Appendix D)
4. Clearance certificate from the State of Georgia/verification of employment.
5. Program of Entry/Teaching Experience Form signed/verified by superintendent or supervisor
(private sector candidates) (Appendix E).
6. In order to be fully admitted in the Doctoral Program (all tracks except for Higher Education),
candidates must successfully complete interview process to include oral and written interviews.
7. GRE required.
Revision 6/1/2017 7
The Doctoral Admission Committee will review all documents submitted. Successful applicants will be
invited to campus for oral and written interviews. Once interviews are completed, successful applicants
will be recommended for admission to Pre-Degree Candidacy Status (PDC) and may begin coursework in
the Ed.D. program.
Requirements for Admission to Degree Candidacy (DC) for the Doctor of Education Degree in
Curriculum and Leadership
1. Completion of all required coursework (minimum of 51semester hours) with a 3.25 GPA and no
more than one (1) grade of C applying toward the degree.
2. Establishment of a Doctoral Committee – It is the responsibility of the Pre-Degree Candidate
(PDC) to invite faculty to become members of the Pre-Degree Candidate’s Doctoral Committee.
The Pre-Degree Candidate is advised to select and invite committee members from among faculty
who have expertise in the area where the PDC plans to conduct research.
3. Identification of a Committee Chair – It is the responsibility of the PDC to ask a faculty member
to serve as Committee Chair.
4. Successful defense of Prospectus.
5. Approval of dissertation proposal by Doctoral Committee.
Upon Approval of Dissertation on Proposal by Doctoral Committee, the candidate must enroll in a
minimum of nine credit hours of EDUF 8999, Dissertation. Enrollment must be consecutive. Permission
from the Doctoral Admission Committee will be required in case of emergencies necessitating the student
to withdraw for one or more semesters.
Requirements for Graduation
1. Approval of dissertation proposal by candidate’s Doctoral Committee
2. Completion of all required coursework (minimum of 63 semester hours) with a 3.25 GPA
and no more than one grade of C applying toward the degree
3. Completion of 9 credit hours of EDUF 8999, Dissertation.
4. Completion of dissertation
5. Successful defense of dissertation
6. Acceptance of dissertation by the COEHP Office of Graduate Studies
7. Residency of a minimum of 51 semester hours
Course of Study
The Doctor of Education in Curriculum and Leadership is comprised of a course of study that has
four (4) distinct phases:
Research (15 semester hours);
Specialization in either Educational Leadership or Curriculum or Higher Education (24 semester
hours);
Dissertation (a minimum of 12 semester hours: Proposal 3 hours, Dissertation 9 hours);
Approved electives in specific discipline areas (a minimum of 12 semester hours). The Course of
Study is presented in Table 1 on the following page.
Revision 6/1/2017 8
Table 1: Doctor of Education in Curriculum and Leadership Program of Study ** Candidates choose one area of SPECIALIZATION
RESEARCH (15 Hours)
EDUL 8715 Doctoral Seminar 3 hours
EDUF 8126 Introduction to Statistical Methods in Education 3 hours
EDUF 8127 Quantitative Research Methods in Education 3 hours
EDUF 8117 Qualitative Research Methods 3 hours
EDUF 8125 Mixed Methods Research in Education 3 hours
SPECIALIZATION** Educational Leadership (24 Hours)
EDUL 8102 Leading For Change 3 hours
EDUL 8104 Supervision of Teaching and Learning 3 hours
EDUL 8105 Leadership Theory 3 hours
EDUL 8126 Politics of Education 3 hours
EDUL 8127 Creating Resilient Leaders 3 hours
EDUL 8108 Applications of Neurological Research to Student Learning 3 hours
EDUL 8209 Organizational Theory: Implications for Student Performance 3 hours
EDUL 8115 Policy and Ethics 3 hours
SPECIALIZATION** Curriculum (24 Hours)
EDUF 8112 Curriculum Design and Evaluation 3 hours
EDCI 8157 Quality Assessment and Evaluation 3 hours
EDCI 8115 Diversity in Education 3 hours
EDCI 8116 Trends and Issues in Curriculum Studies 3 hours
EDCI 7157 Curriculum Development and Reform 3 hours
EDCI 8117 Professional Development and Learning 3 hours
EDUL 8108 Applications of Neurological Research to Student Learning 3 hours
EDCI 8555 Selected Topics in Education (Advanced Collaboration for the Improvement of Curric) 3 hours
SPECIALIZATION** Higher Education (24 Hours)
EDHE 8101 Introduction to Higher Education 3 hours
EDHE 8102 Academic Affairs 3 hours
EDHE 8112 Higher Education Student Services 3 hours
EDHE 8123 Research in Higher Education 3 hours
EDHE 8125 Educational Evaluation 3 hours
EDHE 8110 Policy and Politics of Higher Education 3 hours
EDHE 8720 Current Issues in Higher Education 3 hours
EDHE 8103 Finance and Administrative Affairs 3 hours
Revision 6/1/2017 9
Required Test Scores
The College of Education requires that applicants for the Doctor of Education Degree in Curriculum and
Leadership submit a satisfactory score on the Revised Graduate Record Exam (GRE) with “writing
assessment” component.
Graduate Record Examination (GRE) – The computer-based exam is given Tuesday through Saturday at
the CSU Testing Center. Applicants should contact the CSU Testing Center for arrangements to take the
GRE (706) 565-3562.
Admission Application Deadlines
Graduate applicants must clear all admission requirements prior to the CSU Admission Application
Deadline for the desired semester/session of initial entry to assure admission decision and enrollment in
courses. Applicants attempting to be admitted and/or cleared for graduate admission after the CSU
Admission Application Deadline cannot be assured of entry.
Admission Decisions
The Columbus State University Graduate Admissions Office will notify prospective candidates when
application, GRE scores, transcripts, and immunization form have been received. At that time, prospective
candidates meeting admission criteria will be admitted to Columbus State University Graduate School.
The Columbus State University Admissions Office will forward an Admission Recommendation form to
the Office of COEHP Graduate Studies.
Once the Director of COEHP Graduate Studies approves documentation, successful prospective
candidates will be invited to the campus for written and oral interviews. The Doctoral Office of Advising
and Records will notify prospective candidates who have submitted required items to the Columbus State
University Admissions Office and the COEHP Office of Graduate Studies and have successfully
DISSERTATION (12 Hours)
EDUF 8000 Prospectus 0 hours
EDUF 8129 Developing the Dissertation Proposal 3 hours
EDUF 8999 Dissertation 3 hours
EDUF 8999 Dissertation 3 hours
EDCI 8999 Dissertation 3 hours
ELECTIVES (12 Approved Semester Hours in Discipline as Approved by Advisor )
8*** Total Approved Elective Semester Hours 12 hours
Total Program Semester Hours 63 hours
Revision 6/1/2017 10
completed the interview process conducted by the Doctoral Admission Committee that they have been
admitted as Pre-Degree Candidates. For more information regarding admission and graduation, please
see Requirements for Admission and Graduation, page 7.
Transfer Credit/Residency Requirement and Time Limits
For the Ed.D. in Curriculum and Leadership, students are required to complete 48 hours in residence, to
include 15 hours of research and 9 hours toward the dissertation. Asynchronous (online) and distance
learning courses administered through Columbus State University constitute courses taken in residence.
The Director of Doctoral Programs must approve transfer credit for courses taken prior to acceptance to
COEHP graduate studies at Columbus State University. Grades of “C” or below (including grades of D,
F, or WF) will not be accepted. All requests for transfer credit, to be used in degree programs, must be
submitted to the CSU Registrar’s Office on the Graduate Transfer Credit Approval form with signature
of the program coordinator. This process should be completed during the initial advising stages prior to
development of a plan of study for the student. Up to 12 semester hours of transferred course, credit may
be applied to the doctorate with the approval of the advisor and program coordinator.
All work required for the Ed.D. in Curriculum and Leadership including transfer credit, must be
completed within 10 years of graduation. Extension of time must be requested through the Director of
the Doctoral Program.
Transient Courses
Students may take transient courses at another university to complete degree requirements with approval
of Director of Doctoral Program for the Degree Candidate’s area of concentration and the Degree
Candidate’s Doctoral Committee. Forms for approval of transient courses are located at
http://registrar.columbusstate.edu/forms.php Printable Request Forms, Transient Permission Form.
Forms must be completed and signed by Director of Doctoral Program and chair responsible for the Pre-
Degree/Degree Candidate’s area of concentration and by the Chair of the Degree Candidate’s Doctoral
Committee.
Independent Study
No more than six (6) semester hours of independent study may be applied toward meeting requirements
for a graduate degree. The candidate’s doctoral degree advisor, Director of Doctoral Program and/or
department chair in the student’s area of study must approve independent study. Additional hours of
independent study require the approval of the candidate’s doctoral advisor and department chair
responsible for the area of concentration of the Pre-Degree/Degree Candidate and the Director of COEHP
Graduate Studies. Some program areas do not provide independent study.
Appeals Process
It is the policy of the COEHP to respond to all students who request review of the admission decisions if
the student believes the admission decision was made unfairly or improperly. Appeals are made to the
COEHP Graduate Council and Dean. Applicants who do not meet admission expectations should attempt
to rectify related deficiencies. After attempting to rectify deficiencies, students with compelling evidence
may appeal their admission or other academic status to the College of Education and Health Professions
Graduate Council. To file an appeal, an applicant must obtain a Petition to Appeal Form from the COEHP
Office of Graduate Studies, Frank D. Brown Hall, 3124, 706-568-2301. The form should be completed,
signed by the department chair from the applicant’s program and submitted with materials supporting the
Revision 6/1/2017 11
appeal to the Director of Graduate Studies, Frank D. Brown Hall, 3124. The COEHP Graduate Council
meets each month and as needed to consider appeals. After reviewing the appeal and all of the materials
presented, the COEHP Graduate Council will make a recommendation to approve or deny the appeal to
the Dean of the COEHP. Once a decision is rendered, the Dean of the College of Education and Health
Professions will notify the applicant by mail of the decision. The program coordinator and applicant will
also be notified of the decision by email.
Certification Options
Upon graduation, Curriculum Track graduates may upgrade Curriculum and Instruction certification with
the successful completion of the GACE in Curriculum and Instruction (S-7). Leadership Track candidates
who have certification in Educational Leadership meeting Georgia Professional Standards Commission
requirements will have certification upgraded to the doctoral level (L-7).
Re-entry
Students who have been accepted into Pre-Degree Candidacy or Degree Candidacy in the Doctor of
Education Degree in Curriculum and Leadership, but have not been enrolled in courses (registered) from
one (1) to three (3) years, must complete a “Re-entry” form with the CSU Admissions Office.
Readmission
Students who have been accepted into Pre-Degree Candidacy or Degree Candidacy in the Doctor of
Education Degree in Curriculum and Leadership, but have not been enrolled in courses for three (3) or
more years must reapply for admission to the degree program. Candidate will need to meet current
requirements/expectations for admission to include review of transcripts, GRE, and completion of the
interview process. Students accepted for graduate study in other colleges, must re-apply and meet COEHP
graduate admission requirements prior to enrolling in COEHP graduate studies.
Orientation
Candidates are required to complete an orientation for the Ed.D. program. After the Pre-Degree Candidate
participates in orientation, the PDC is required to download, print, and sign a degree progress sheet,
Appendix K. The Pre-Degree Candidate completes the progress sheet and meets with a Doctoral Program
Advisor. Once this meeting is completed, the Doctoral Program Advisor will forward the completed form
to the Director of Doctoral Program.
REGISTRATION
Registration Holds/Restrictions
Registration Course Restrictions - In certain situations, courses that apply toward the Doctor of Education
Degree in Curriculum and Leadership require pre-requisites or are otherwise restricted to students in
certain areas of study. In a case where a student needs to register for a course to which that student is
restricted, the Director of Doctoral Program or chair responsible for the student’s area of concentration
may remove the hold if appropriate.
Registration Program Restriction
The “Registration Program Restriction” prevents students from enrolling in program area courses that are
limited to students who have been admitted to the specified degree program/program area. Educational
Leadership and Counseling programs to control enrollment of outside students currently utilize the
“Registration Program Restriction”. As in all of the registration holds/restrictions, students may be
Revision 6/1/2017 12
Placed in courses with written approval from Director of Doctoral Program and department chair
responsible for the Pre-Degree/Degree Candidate’s area of concentration.
Academic Registration Hold Pre-Degree or Degree Candidates who earn one grade of “C” or below in the doctoral program, fall below
a GPA of 3.25, or find themselves on academic probation will have a hold placed on registration until
seeking academic counseling from an advisor, Director of Doctoral Program or department chair
responsible for the Pre-Degree/Degree Candidate’s area of concentration, or from the Degree Candidate’s
Doctoral Committee. Once academic counseling has taken place, the Director of Doctoral Program or
department chair responsible for the Pre-Degree/Degree Candidate’s area of concentration, or the Chair
of the Degree Candidate’s Doctoral Committee may remove the Academic Registration Hold.
Course Enrollment Overload
COEHP graduate courses are scheduled with a maximum enrollment number of students to assure quality
instruction. The integrity and quality of a course may be compromised when students are added to a full
course. Students may be placed in a full course with written approval from the course instructor and/or
Director of Doctoral Program.
Study Loads and Enrollment Status
Maximum Study Load. The maximum course load for any graduate student is 12 semester hours.
Students holding graduate assistantships must register for at least nine, but no more than 10 semester
hours of graduate credit. In all cases, graduate students are urged to register only for the number of hours
they can complete successfully.
Enrollment status for graduate students is based on the number of hours enrolled, excluding withdrawn
courses, as follows:
Number of Semester Hours Enrolled Graduate Enrollment Status
Full-time 9 or more semester hours
Half-time 4 semester hours
Less than half-time 1-3 semester hours
Students on financial aid seeking information about how enrollment status may affect financial aid
eligibility should contact the Financial Aid office.
Graduate Assistantships
A student holding an appointment as a graduate assistant must be fully admitted to a graduate degree
program, be in good academic standing, and earn a minimum of nine and maximum of 10 semester
hours of graduate course work (or required prerequisites) during the period in which the assistantship is
held. Work assignments cannot exceed 19 hours per week. Students granted an assistantship are not
permitted to reduce their course load to less than 9 hours and retain the assistantship.
Revision 6/1/2017 13
Academic Standing
Required Academic Standing
Students enrolled in a degree program must maintain a minimum graduate overall grade point average of
3.25 for the Doctor of Education.. Students must be in Good Academic Standing to be eligible for
graduation and for admission to Doctoral Candidacy. Good Academic Standing is defined for doctoral
students as an overall GPA of 3.25 or higher.
Courses earned with grades of "D" may not be used toward a graduate degree or certificate, but will be
calculated in the overall grade point average. Courses with earned grades of "C" or below may not be
transferred from another institution for credit toward a graduate degree or certificate. A minimum
graduate program grade point average of 3.25 is required in the doctoral program. A maximum of one
course with a grade of C may apply to the Doctor of Education in Curriculum and Leadership. Courses
with earned grades of D or below (including grades of D, F, or WF) may not be used toward degree or
certification completion, but will be calculated in the overall graduate grade point average.
Graduate students are expected to maintain Good Academic Standing as they progress toward
completing their programs. Students will be evaluated each term based on the overall GPA. The
academic standing classifications for doctoral students are as follows:
1. Good Academic Standing
2. Academic Probation
3. Academic Exclusion
Academic Probation
A student whose overall grade point average falls below 3.25 in the Doctoral Program, after the
completion of at least nine (9) hours of graduate work in their program, begins the next term on
academic probation. A student must earn a term GPA of 3.25 or higher each term while on Academic
Probation.
One of three possible actions will be implemented for a student on Academic Probation at the end of
each term of enrollment:
1. A student who earns a term GPA of 3.0 or higher and raises his or her overall GPA to 3.0 or
higher will return to Good Academic Standing.
2. A student whose term GPA is 3.0 or higher, but whose overall GPA remains below 3.0, will
remain on Academic Probation.
3. A student who earns a term GPA below 3.0 while on Academic Probation, regardless of the
overall GPA, will be excluded for one term.
Removal from Probation
Occurs when, at the end of a probationary term a student's graduate overall grade point average equals or
exceeds 3.25.
Academic Exclusion
Occurs when a student on academic probation earns a term GPA below 3.25 regardless of the overall
GPA. The length of exclusion will be a minimum of one term. One term is defined as the Fall, Spring,
Revision 6/1/2017 14
or Summer term. The Summer term includes all sessions; thus, an excluded student is required to sit out
all sessions that comprise the Summer term. The student must apply to be reinstated by the program and
college.
Reinstatement for the Doctor of Education Program
Mandatory period of exclusion is a minimum of one term. Students must apply for reinstatement after
the period of exclusion to the College of Education and Health Professions Doctoral Admissions
Committee.
Process for Applying for Readmission Following Exclusion The student on Academic Exclusion is not guaranteed the opportunity to return to the University.
Steps to be followed for students seeking to be reinstated are:
1. Following the period of exclusion, the student must apply for readmission to the university.
2. The student should submit a letter indicating justification for reinstatement to the Chair of the
Department that houses the student's program of study (or to a new program of study).
3. The Director of the Doctoral Program obtains input from doctoral faculty and makes a
recommendation to the Graduate Admissions Committee.
4. With a positive recommendation the committee, the student will be reinstated on probation and
allowed to continue coursework subject to the prevailing course schedule and all provisions or
conditions established by the Director of the Doctoral Program or committee.
5. The student being reinstated must sign a statement indicating understanding of the conditions
under which reinstatement is occurring such as, the requirements for returning to Good
Academic Standing, the consequences for obtaining a term GPA lower than 3.0 (3.25 for the
doctoral program), and the knowledge that students must be in Good Academic Standing to be
eligible for graduation and for admission to Doctoral Candidacy.
Degree Completion/Graduation
A student cannot complete requirements for the Doctor of Education Degree in Curriculum and
Leadership or graduate from the College of Education & Health Professions doctoral program with an
earned grade of C or below (including grades of D, F, or WF) in more than one course.
Grades of D or below (including grades of F or WF) cannot be used for degree completion and/or
acquisition of certifications; however, a grade of D or below will be calculated in the student’s overall
grade point average (calculating grades of D or below will impact the student’s overall GPA and
potential degree and/or certification completion).
Courses taken at other institutions with earned grades of C or below (including grades of D, F, or WF)
cannot be used as transfer courses by students entering COEHP graduate studies.
A student cannot complete degree requirements for the Doctor of Education Degree in Curriculum and
Leadership with a grade point average below 3.25.
Revision 6/1/2017 15
Academic Misconduct
Students are responsible for adhering to the regulations pertaining to academic misconduct published
under Student Rights and Responsibilities in the Student Handbook available in the Student Life Office
and on the Web at http://students.columbusstate.edu/.
Grievance
Faculty members and/or students may refer to the latest edition of the CSU Student Handbook (Students
Rights and Responsibilities), the CSU Faculty Handbook, Director of Judicial Affairs, and/or Dean of
Students for detailed information regarding policies and procedures for classroom behavior, academic
grievances and related concerns.
Attendance
Regular attendance is a requirement in the Doctor of Education Degree Program in Curriculum and
Leadership. More than nine (9) clock hours of absence from class in a three-semester hour course will
result in withdrawal from the course. Instructors may set other attendance requirements. Tardiness to
class may result in a student being marked absent from the class.
Students participating in classes at a distance in online, video, synchronous or asynchronous courses will
be subject to participation requirements to include real-time participation or submission of student work
by deadlines set by instructors.
Repetition of Courses
Students repeating a course for which credit has already been earned either at Columbus State University
or by transfer of credits from another institution forfeit the previous credit in that course (except in the
case of courses that may be repeated for credit). The student's final grade in the course will be the one
made on repetition (even if the grade in the previous course is higher). No more than two courses may be
repeated and for no more than one time each. Only courses with grades of C or below may be repeated.
After earning a graduate degree at Columbus State University, a student will forfeit credit earned for
courses taken as repeat courses after graduation (except in the case of courses that may be repeated for
credit).
Graduation Procedures (Refer to CSU website and/or current CSU catalog)
Degree Candidates completing all requirements for the Doctor of Education Degree in Curriculum and
Leadership and desiring to apply for graduation should apply on-line to the CSU Registrar’s Office one
(1) semester prior to their anticipated semester/session of completion.
Students must assure that the following documents/requirements are completed and forwarded to
the CSU Registrar’s Office:
Application for Graduation (Apply on-line via MyCSU through the Enrollment Services tab).
Approval of Defense of Dissertation signed by all Doctoral Committee Members
Certification that all requirements for Doctor of Education Degree in Curriculum and Leadership
have been met
“Approval of Transfer Credit for Graduate Students” Forms
Verification of Approved Course/Credit Substitutions
Verification that all financial obligations to CSU have been satisfied (CSU Registrar or related
offices)
Revision 6/1/2017 16
Additional documents as requested (TBA)
UNIVERSITY LIBRARY - Doctoral Library Assistance
CSU Libraries offer general research assistance to doctoral students. Individual meetings can be
scheduled with the education liaison librarian. The following stipulations must be met before an
appointment can be made:
Student must have selected a topic
Student must have done preliminary research/searching on topic
Student advised to give a two week notice of needed appointment
CSU Libraries do not offer the following services:
1. Reading of drafts
2. Citation style checking
3. Deep content assistance
INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD
The CSU Institutional Review Board (IRB) must approve all research involving human subjects.
Instructions for applying for IRB review can found at this website:
http://research.columbusstate.edu/irb/
Revision 6/1/2017 17
APPENDIX A
Columbus State University
College of Education and Health Professions
DOCTOR OF EDUCATION PROGRAM CHECKLIST
Person(s)
Responsible
Date Initials –
Advisor/Chair
Upon Admission to the Doctoral Program:
1st semester in the program
Complete the Online COEHP Graduate Orientation. Student
Meet with pre-candidate and complete Advisory Form (See
Appendix G) Student &
Advisor
Complete and review dispositions with student. (Semester 1) Student &
Advisor
Pre-Degree Candidacy Period Responsibilities:
Complete and review dispositions with student. (Semester 3) Student &
Advisor
Completion of all coursework up to Dissertation with a minimum
of a 3.25 GPA and no more than one grade of C or below Student &
Advisor
Register for EDUF 8000, Prospectus Student
Select Doctoral Committee and Committee Chair (at least 3
members) (See Appendix H: Doctoral Dissertation Committee
Appointment Form. Original to Director of the Doctoral Program
who ensures appropriate signatures with signed forwarded to
student, Doctoral Committee Chair, and Office of Doctoral
Advising and Records)
Student,
Advisor &
Committee
Chair
Prepare Chapters 1 and 2 of Dissertation for Defense of
Prospectus Student &
Committee
Upon successful completion Prospectus Defense Student and
Chair submit Approval of Prospectus form (Original to Director
of the Doctoral Program who ensures appropriate signatures with
signed forwarded to student, Doctoral Committee Chair, and
Office of Doctoral Advising and Records)
Student &
Chair
Upon successful completion of defense of the Dissertation
Proposal, the Dissertation Committee submits a signed copy of
the Doctoral Committee Proposal Approval Form. (Original to
Director of the Doctoral Program who ensures appropriate
signatures with signed forwarded to student, Doctoral Committee
Chair, and Office of Doctoral Advising and Records). Program
Chair will change candidacy status in ISIS.)
Student,
Chair, & All
Committee
Members
Degree Candidacy Period Responsibilities:
Submission of IRB Application for review by CSU Institutional
Review Board (IRB). IRB application information is found at this
website: http://research.columbusstate.edu/irb/
Student &
Chair
Completion of dissertation Student &
Chair
Submit Application for Dissertation Defense to Doctoral
Committee Chair (See Appendix L. Copies to student, student’s
file, and Committee Chair.)
Student &
Chair
Revision 6/1/2017 18
Post notification of Dissertation Defense (Use Application for
Dissertation Defense form, Appendix L.) Student &
Chair
Successful defense of dissertation and approval of dissertation by
Doctoral Committee. (Final Approval of Dissertation form,
Appendix M, completed by Doctoral Committee. Copies to
student, student’s file, and Committee Chair)
Student &
Chair
Graduation Responsibilities:
Submission of final copy of dissertation to the Director of
Doctoral Program who is responsible for printing and filing with
the Schwob Library Archives and publication in e Press
(graduation requirement)
Student
Apply to graduate with Office of Enrollment Services one
semester prior to Final Defense of Dissertation (online) Student
Complete Degree Progress Sheet and submit to the appropriate
persons for signatures and then to the Director of the Doctoral
Program.
Student &
Chair
Revision 6/1/2017 19
APPENDIX B
Sample Program of Study by Semester for
Ed.D. in Curriculum and Leadership (Leadership Track)
1 of 2
Continues on next page
Semester 1 (Fall Semester)
EDUL 8715 (3) Doctoral Seminar
EDUL 8102 (3) Leading For Change
Semester 2 (Spring Semester)
EDUL 8105 (3) Leadership Theory
EDUL 8126 (3) Politics of Education
Semester 3 (Summer Semester)
EDUF 8126 (3) Introduction to Statistical Methods in Education
EDUL 8108 (3) Applications of Neurological Research to Student Learning
Semester 4 (Fall Semester)
EDUF 8127 (3) Quantitative Experimental Research
EDUL 8104 (3) Supervision of Teaching and Learning
Semester 5 (Spring Semester)
EDUF 8117 (3) Qualitative Research Methods
EDUL 8209 (3) Organizational Theory: Implications for Student Performance
Semester 6 (Summer Semester)
EDUL 8127 (3) Creating Resilient Leaders
EDUF 8125 (3) Mixed Methods in Research Education
Revision 6/1/2017 20
Sample Program of Study by Semester for
Ed.D. in Curriculum and Leadership (Leadership Track) 2 of 2
Semester 7 (Fall Semester)
EDUF 8000 (0) Prospectus
EDUF 8129 (3) Developing the Dissertation Proposal
EDUL 8115 (3) Policy and Ethics
E*** 8*** (3) Approved Electives
Semester 8 (Spring Semester)
EDUF 8999 (3) Dissertation
E*** 8*** (3) Approved Electives
Semester 9 (Fall Semester)
EDUF 8999 (3) Dissertation
E*** 8*** (3) Approved Electives
Semester 10 (Spring Semester)
EDUF 8999 (3) Dissertation
E*** 8*** (3) Approved Electives
Revision 6/1/2017 21
Sample Program of Study by Semester for
Ed.D. in Curriculum and Leadership (Curriculum Track)
1 of 2
Continues on next page
Semester 1 (Fall Semester)
EDUL 8715 (3) Doctoral Seminar
EDCI 7157 (3) Curriculum Development and Reform
Semester 2 (Spring Semester)
EDCI 8116 (3) Trends and Issues in Curriculum Studies
EDCI 8157 (3) Quality Assessment and Evaluation
Semester 3 (Summer Semester)
EDUF 8112 (3) Curriculum Design and Evaluation
EDCI 8115 (3) Diversity in Education
Semester 4 (Fall Semester)
EDUF 8126 (3) Introduction to Statistical Methods in Education
EDCI 8555 (3) Selected Topics in Education (Policy Perspectives on Curriculum Teaching)
Semester 5 (Spring Semester)
EDUF 8127 (3) Quantitative Experimental Research
EDCI 8555 (3) Selected Topics in Education (Advanced Collaboration for the Improvement of
Curriculum)
Semester 6 (Summer Semester)
EDUF 8117 (3) Qualitative Research Methods
EDCI 8117 (3) Professional Development and Learning
Revision 6/1/2017 22
Sample Program of Study by Semester for
Ed.D. in Curriculum and Leadership (Curriculum Track)
2 of 2
Semester 7 (Fall Semester)
EDUF 8000 (0) Prospectus
EDUF 8129 (3) Developing the Dissertation Proposal
EDUF 8125 (3) Mixed Methods in Research Education
E*** 8*** (3) Approved Electives
Semester 8 (Spring Semester)
EDUF 8999 (3) Dissertation
E*** 8*** (3) Approved Electives
Semester 9 (Fall Semester)
EDUF 8999 (3) Dissertation
E*** 8*** (3) Approved Electives
Semester 10 (Spring Semester)
EDUF 8999 (3) Dissertation
E*** 8*** (3) Approved Electives
Revision 6/1/2017 23
Sample Program of Study by Semester for Ed.D.
in Curriculum and Leadership (Higher Education Track ONLINE)
1 of 2
Continuation on next page
Semester 1 (Fall Semester)
EDUL 8715 (3) Doctoral Seminar
EDHE 8101 (3) Introduction to Higher Education
Semester 2 (Spring Semester)
EDUF 8126 (3) Introduction to Statistical Methods in Education
EDHE 8102 (3) Academic Affairs
Semester 3 (Summer Semester)
EDUF 8127 (3) Quantitative Experimental Research
EDHE 8112 (3) Higher Education Student Services
Semester 4 (Fall Semester)
EDUF 8117 (3) Qualitative Research Methods
EDHE 8125 (3) Educational Evaluation
Semester 5 (Spring Semester)
EDUF 8125 (3) Mixed Methods Research in Education
EDHE 8720 (3) Current Issues in Higher Education
Semester 6 (Summer Semester)
EDHE 8110 (3) Policy and Politics of Higher Education
EDHE 8123 (3) Research in High Education
Revision 6/1/2017 24
Sample Program of Study by Semester for
Ed.D. in Curriculum and Leadership (Higher Education Track)
2 of 2
Semester 7 (Fall Semester)
EDUF 8000 (0) Prospectus
EDUF 8129 (3) Developing the Dissertation Proposal
EDHE 8103 (3) Finance and Administrative Affairs
E*** 8*** (3) Approved Electives or Internship
Semester 8 (Spring Semester)
EDUF 8999 (3) Dissertation
E*** 8*** (3) Approved Electives
Semester 9 (Fall Semester)
EDUF 8999 (3) Dissertation
E*** 8*** (3) Approved Electives
Semester 10 (Spring Semester)
EDUF 8999 (3) Dissertation
E*** 8*** (3) Approved Electives
Revision 6/1/2017 25
APPENDIX C
Office of Graduate Studies
College of Education and Health Professions
Frank Brown Hall - 3124
4225 University Avenue
Columbus, Georgia 31907-5645 706-565-1450
We are delighted at your interest in our Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) Degree in Curriculum or Leadership. We
also offer an Ed.D. Higher Education online program. The Ed.D. program is organized in a COHORT
STRUCTURE where candidates enrolled take coursework together. New students are accepted to on campus,
online, and satellite programs in varying semesters (not every semester). Please contact Director of Ed.D. (contact
information below), for more information about your program of interest.
**Please ensure that you have submitted ALL the following to the CSU Graduate Admissions Office,
4225 University Avenue, University Hall, Columbus, Georgia, 31907-5645 or (706) 568-2462 (fax).
Apply with the admissions office at the link below ($50.00 fee required) by downloading and printing the
application from the link below:
Submit all official transcripts to the admissions office
Submit GRE scores*
Submit current Certificate of Immunization to CSU Graduate Admissions (at above website)
Complete and send the attached documents in this packet as well as the ones below.
*NOTE: You may take the GRE, online, any day at the CSU Testing Center. The test is the GRE General Test, Verbal, Quantitative, and
Analytical Writing, computer-based version. You may apply for this test at ets.org. For more information, please contact the CSU Testing
Center at 706-507-8020.
Please also ensure that you have submitted ALL the following departmental documents to Columbus State University,
Admissions Office, 4225 University Avenue, University Hall, Columbus, Georgia, 31907-5645 or (706) 568-2462 (fax):
Resume – Include previous education, related professional employment/experiences, professional service/contributions,
and special recognition.
Two (2) Letters of Reference – At least one letter of reference should be from a building level administrator (principal) or
your direct supervisor if you are in a system level position or other work arena. Additional references may be provided if
desired. (Use “Letter of Recommendation Form” provided).
Two (2) additional references we can call
Demographic Information Form (form attached)
Clearance certificate from the State of Georgia and verification of employment or federal background check
Verification of Experience Form signed/verified by superintendent or supervisor (corporate sector applicant).
(form attached)
Acceptable scores on oral and written interview completed on campus (scheduled at a later date)
Thank you for your interest in Columbus State University. Let us know if we can assist you in any way.
Sincerely,
Dr. Tom Hackett, Chair, CFL
hackett_paul@columbusstate.edu
706-507-8968
Revision 6/1/2017 26
Doctor of Education Degree in Curriculum and Leadership or Higher Education
To be Admitted to Columbus State University Graduate School: The requirements for admission to Graduate
School for consideration for pre-candidate status by the College of Education and Health Professions Office of
Graduate Studies Doctor of Education Degree in Curriculum and Leadership or Higher Education degree:
1. The applicant must hold at least a master’s degree from an accredited United States institution, or the
equivalent from an international institution.
2. The applicant must be in academic good standing at the institution last attended.
3. The applicant must file an official application and related documents with the Columbus State University
(CSU) Graduate Admissions Office.
4. GPA of at least 3.5 on all graduate course work at an accredited United States institution in fulfillment of
the requirement for a graduate degree;
5. The applicant must submit a copy documentation of satisfactory scores on the general portion (quantitative
and verbal) of the Revised Graduate Record Exam (GRE) with a satisfactory score on the “writing
assessment” component. 6. Four (4) years of experience in a school setting or in a leadership role in the private sector or commensurate
experience approved by Doctoral Admissions Committee.
7. The successful applicant must not have a criminal record or discharge from the armed services that would
prevent recommendation for related teacher, counseling or leadership positions.
8. The successful applicant must not have been removed from or denied admittance to a teacher education
program or student teaching.
Please ensure that you have submitted ALL the following to the CSU Graduate Admissions Office:
Apply with the admissions office: (http://admissions.columbusstate.edu/grad/index.php);
$50.00 fee required
Submit all official transcripts to the admissions office
Submit GRE scores
Submit current Certificate of Immunization to CSU Graduate Admissions (online at above website)
For consideration by the College of Education and Health Professions Doctoral Admission Committee,
submit these documents to the Admissions Office:
Resume – Include previous education, related professional employment/experiences, professional
service/contributions, and special recognition.
Two (2) Letters of Reference – At least one letter of reference should be from a building level administrator
(principal) or your direct supervisor if you are in a system level position or in the corporate sector. Additional
references may be provided if desired. (Use “Letter of Recommendation Form” provided).
Demographic Information Form (form attached)
Clearance certificate from the State of Georgia/verification of employment.
Federal background check needed only if not currently in a school environment.
Program of Entry/Teaching Experience Form signed/verified by superintendent or supervisor (private sector
candidates)
Acceptable scores on oral and written interviews scheduled by Doctoral Admissions Committee.
Revision 6/1/2017 27
LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION FORM
For Admission to Graduate Studies
Doctoral Degree Program
College of Education and Health Professions
Columbus State University
TO BE COMPLETED BY THE APPLICANT
Applicant’s Name: _____________________________________________________________________
Address: ______________________________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: _______________________ Email: ______________________________________
Major/Area of Study: (check one) _____Curriculum
_____ Leadership
_____ Higher Education
Semester you are applying: ______________________________ of _______ (year)
Please Mail or Fax Reference to: Columbus State University
Admissions Office
4225 University Avenue
Columbus, GA 31907-5645
Fax # 706-568-2462
Under the provisions of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974, you may decide whether letters of reference
written at your request are to be held confidential or whether they are to be available for your personal inspection. Check one
of the following statements and place your signature in the space provided so that the referee will be advised of your choice.
___ Confidential file. I grant permission for this letter of recommendation to be held confidential by
Columbus State University
___ Open file. I retain the choice of having letters of reference available to me
______________________________________________ _______________________________________
Signature of Applicant Date
……………………………………………………………… TO BE COMPLETED BY INDIVIDUAL RECOMMENDING THE APPLICANT
You may wish to make additional comments by letter. If so, please attach your letter to this form so that the department may
identify the applicant’s choice with respect to the right of access under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act.
Please note that while the applicant may have waived his/her right of access under the Family Educational Rights and Privacy
Act, in some circumstances this letter may be subject to disclosure under the provisions of the Georgia Open Records Act.
Please mail this recommendation directly to the applicant’s department as noted above.
1. Knowledge of Applicant:
Approximately, how long have you known this applicant? _____________________________________
How well do you feel you know the applicant? Casually ________ Well _______ Very Well _______
What was the nature of your contact(s) with the applicant?
___Teacher ___Major Advisor ___Employer ___Other (Specify) ______
Revision 6/1/2017 28
2. Evaluation: In comparison with other students who have the same amount of experience and training, I rate this person
as follows:
Top
5%
Top
10%
Top
20%
Upper
50%
Unable
To Rate
Knowledge in subject of proposed study
Ability to grasp new concepts
Originality, Intellectual creativity
Mathematical and logical thought
Written expression
Oral expression
Human Relation Skills
Perseverance toward goals
Ethical Dispositions
Potential as a counselor (if applicable)
Potential as an educational leader (if applicable)
3. Recommendation: Considering this applicant’s academic records, special abilities, ambition, and
determination, please indicate your recommendation:
___ Recommend strongly ___ Recommend with reservation
___ Recommend ___ Cannot recommend
4. Additional Comments: Please add any comments that you feel will assist in evaluating the applicant’s
potential to pursue graduate study.
Name of Individual Recommending Applicant (please print): ____________________________________
Date ______________
Signature: ______________________________________________________________________________
Title: _________________________________ Organization: ____________________________________
City, state, zip code: ______________________________________________________________________
Phone number (optional): (___) ________________________ Email: ______________________________
PLEASE MAIL OR FAX THIS FORM DIRECTLY TO THE ADMISSIONS OFFICE
THE ADDRESS AND FAX # ARE ON PAGE 1 OF THIS FORM
Revision 6/1/2017 29
COLUMBUS STATE UNIVERSITY
Doctor of Education Degree in Curriculum and Leadership or Higher Education
Demographic Sheet
Student: _____________________________________________________
Address: _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________
School System: _____________________________________________________
(or work place name)
School Name: ____________________________________________________
School (work) Address: _____________________________________________
____________________________________________
Telephone:
(Work)__________________________________________
(Home)__________________________________________
(Cell)____________________________________________
Email ___________________________________________
Previous degrees, date awarded college or university:
Degree Major Date College or University
Undergraduate: ________________________ ____________ ________________________________
Masters: _____________________________ ___________ ________________________________
Specialist: ___________________________ ___________ _______________________________
Area of Interest in the Doctoral Program (Check One)
o Educational Leadership
o Curriculum & Instruction
o Higher Education (fully online program)
Columbus, GA
COEHP Graduate Studies Program
Program Entry/Teaching Experience
Verification Form
Revision 6/1/2017 30
To the Applicant: Complete Part A
PART A: Applicant’s Name:
Last____________________________ First______________________________ MI______________
Student Identification Number (909): _________________Social Security Number: _________________
Degree Program: _______________________
School________________________________
District/System_________________________
Leadership Position Currently Held
___Team Leader ___Assistant Principal ___Department Chair
___ Leadership Team ___Principal ___Grade Level Chair
Other: ______________________________________________________________________________
Number of years: TEACHING experience ________________
Number of years: ADMINISTRATIVE experience _________
_________________________________________________________________________________
Part B: Superintendent – Please verify applicant’s leadership position. Signature denotes leadership
ROLE as defined by local system.
________________________________________________________________
Name of Superintendent or Supervisor (PLEASE PRINT)
__________________________________________________________ _____________________
Signature of Superintendent or Supervisor Date
__________________________ _____________________________ _____________________
City District State
Please e-mail form to: data_entry@columbusstate.edu or send to the following:
Office of Admissions
Columbus State University
4225 University Avenue
Columbus, Georgia 31907-5645
Fax: (706) 568-2462
Revision 6/1/2017 31
APPENDIX D
College of Education and Health Professions (COEHP)
Advisement Verification Form for Doctoral Candidates
To the Student: Complete Part A, including your signature.
To the Advisor: In order to verify that the student has met with you, please sign and date Part B.
Part A
Student‘s Name
Last _______________________ First_________________ Middle_________________ Jr., etc.____
CSU ID Number _______________________________
Graduate Program to which you have been admitted: ______Ed.D. in Curriculum & Leadership
Area of Emphasis: _____Curriculum
_____Leadership
_____Higher Education
Signature of Student: _______________________________ Date: _______________
Part B
The student listed above has met with me regarding the course of study in his/her desired graduate
program.
Signature of Advisor: ________________________________ Date: ________________
Advisor please return completed form to:
Program Assistant, COEHP Doctoral Program, Frank Brown Hall
Room 3107 - Phone: 706-565-1447
Revision 6/1/2017 32
APPENDIX E
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROFESSIONS
COLUMBUS STATE UNIVERSITY
DOCTORAL DISSERTATION COMMITTEE APPOINTMENT FORM
Student Name _____________________________________ Date ________________________
Current Address
______________________________________________________________________________
Street City State Zip
Discipline _____________________________________
Members of the Advisory Committee: Signature
_________________________________ ____________________________________
(Chair)
_________________________________ ____________________________________
_________________________________ ____________________________________
(Methodologist)
_________________________________ ____________________________________
_________________________________ ____________________________________
Procedural information:
____________________________________________ ________________________________________________
Signature of Candidate Date Signature of Department Chair Date
____________________________________________ ________________________________________________
Signature of Director of Graduate Studies: Date Signature of Dean, COEHP Date
cc: Committee
Student
Revision 6/1/2017 33
APPENDIX F
ONE-PAGE PROSPECTUS ABSTRACT
Doctoral Student present this completed form to your Committee
Chair to initiate the discussion concerning Prospectus Defense.
Doctoral Candidate Student ID
Tentative Title:
Statement of Problem:
Definition of the Area for Research:
Overarching Research Question(s):
Proposed Methodology:
Revision 6/1/2017 34
Columbus State University Doctoral Program in Education
DISSERTATION PROSPECTUS APPROVAL FORM The dissertation prospectus submitted by:
Candidate Name: ______________________________ Candidate ID: _________________
Entitled:_________________________________________________________________
The date of the dissertation prospectus defense: ______________________
The dissertation prospectus has been read, defended and approved by the undersigned. It is
recommended for acceptance to the University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of
Doctor of Education. The candidate may proceed with the conduct of the dissertation process to include
subsequent submission of the proposal.
______________________________________________ ________________________ Dissertation
Committee Chair (Date)
______________________________________________ ________________________ Dissertation
Committee Member (Date)
______________________________________________ ________________________ Dissertation
Committee Member (Date)
& Methodologist
______________________________________________ ________________________ Dissertation
Committee Member (Date)
Recommended by:
______________________________________________ ________________________
Director of Doctoral Program (Date)
______________________________________________ ________________________
Dean, College of Education and Health Professions (Date)
Revision 6/1/2017 35
Prospectus Defined
The Prospectus is a substantial review and critical analysis of the literature on a topic and
is comprised of Chapters I (Introduction) and II (Review of Literature) of the Dissertation. The
review is both descriptive and evaluative of an area of inquiry of scholarly work done in the past.
The review generally identifies an emphasis on a topic, theme, or point that evolved as a result of
analysis of literature. Typically, a research question has been proposed to guide the review. The
review is a report of primary or original scholarship of mostly written documents. It is not a
summary of the literature, but a thoughtful and comprehensive analysis and synthesis of the
literature, formulating recommendations and placing the topic in an updated context of established
work in the discipline.
The dissertation prospectus must demonstrate that the doctoral candidate has technical mastery of
subject and knowledge of research techniques sufficient enough to carry out independent,
significant scholarly work that will be a meaningful contribution to knowledge and practice in
education. The candidate must also demonstrate high standards for quality investigation of the
literature and knowledge base. In addition, the dissertation prospectus must reflect a problem,
issue, or study that is compatible with the mission of the Ed.D. in education.
Key Elements
In consultation with the dissertation chair and committee members, the student will write a
dissertation prospectus consisting of the statement of the problem, the research question(s), the
literature review, and references. Throughout the writing process, the student must work closely
with his/her dissertation committee. The prospectus must be submitted to the committee
members at least two weeks prior to the scheduled prospectus defense.
No further work (specifically no data collection) on the dissertation should be undertaken by the
student researcher until the prospectus is successfully defended and approved by all members of
the Doctoral Committee. This procedure protects the interests of the student researcher, the
Doctoral Committee chair and members, and the University.
Primary Purpose
The student researcher should remember that the primary purpose of the prospectus is to convince
the Doctoral Committee that the researcher is familiar with the literature in the area to be researched
and that this research will fill a void in the literature and the knowledge base. An additional
consideration for the prospectus is that the student researcher has outlined a research topic and
agenda that can be completed and that will make a contribution to the knowledge base of education.
This is a critical chapter of the dissertation because this is the conceptual and theoretical foundation
for the research project. Since Chapter I serves as the foundation of the research and because some
components of this chapter will be incorporated in the full proposal (Chapters I, II, and III), the
prospectus (Chapters I & II) typically will be from 50 to 75 pages in length.
Reference Section
The student researcher should include a reference section at the conclusion of the prospectus. This
segment will be placed in another section of the final dissertation, but a list of references used in
Revision 6/1/2017 36
the prospectus should be included for the benefit of the readers. In addition, it is very helpful to
the Doctoral Committee and to the student if a tentative timeline is also included with the
prospectus. The student researcher is also cautioned to make sure that a title page and initial table
of contents page are also included in the prospectus.
Major Research Studies
A chart or table that outlines the major research studies related to the major components
in Chapter II should be included. For example, if there are three primary components in Chapter
II, educational reform, education in Georgia, and curriculum directors, then there must be a chart
or table of major studies about each of the topics. Finally, a Concept Analysis Chart combining all
the elements of the study should be included. An excellent sample is provided in the Appendix.
The primary elements of the Concept Analysis Chart should include: (1) Authors and dates of
studies to be included; (2) study participants; (3) research design; and (4) outcomes of the study.
This section is not a bibliography; only the most important studies should be included. This is not
about how much the candidate knows, but about how the researcher can convince the dissertation
committee of the important studies and how they relate to each other.
The Doctoral Committee has the responsibility of answering two questions at the
conclusion of the prospectus defense: (1) Does the study make a contribution to the literature in
education; and (2) Is the study doable? These questions should help guide the student researcher
and the Doctoral Committee in planning, developing, and presenting the prospectus.
Prospectus Revision After Defense
Immediately following the successful defense of the prospectus, the student researcher
should make the suggested changes and modifications before beginning work on the remaining
chapters of the dissertation.
Revision 6/1/2017 37
PROTOCOLS FOR THE
DOCTORAL DISSERTATION PROSPECTUS DEFENSE
The role of the Chair of the Doctoral Dissertation Prospectus Committee is to convene
members of the Committee and the candidate to discuss the full Prospectus. The Committee
must make an assessment as to whether: (1) the proposed study is logically and rationally
presented; (2) the proposed study has developed an efficient and effective review of literature;
and, (3) the study is of sufficient depth to insure contribution to the field. The Committee may
make recommendations to enhance the quality and conduct of the study that may be addressed
by the candidate during the coming months. It should be noted that the formal Dissertation
Proposal must be presented and approved by the Committee at a later date.
DISSERTATION PROSPECTUS DEFENSE
As set forth in the Handbook for Doctoral Studies in Education
(Columbus State University, 2016)
1. The committee chair will explain the purpose of the meeting and the committee’s primary
tasks.
2. The committee chair will explain how the committee meeting will be conducted.
3. The committee chair will explain the two options (votes) available to each committee
member: “pass” or “fail.” The Chair will introduce the candidate and give the title of the
proposed study.
4. The candidate will take 15-20 minutes acquainting the committee with the proposed
study. In this time period, she/he will also present essential and notable points regarding:
a. the problem studied and why the study was significant.
b. “significant” aspects of the literature review reported in Chapter 2.
c. an overview of the proposed research methodology.
Revision 6/1/2017 38
5. Committee members will ask questions in turn, as set forth in #2 above. The candidate
will respond to the questions posed and further discussion, if appropriate, will ensue.
When committee-candidate interactions are complete, the candidate will leave the room
while the committee deliberates.
6. The committee will vote as to the defensibility of the dissertation prospectus,
according to these criteria:
a. Has the candidate proceeded according to the requirements for the dissertation
prospectus?
b. Were the committee’s concerns addressed to every member’s satisfaction?
c. Did the candidate organize the presentation around the written materials?
d. Was the description of the problem adequate?
e. Did the candidate accurately portray the importance of the study in such a manner
that it makes a contribution to the field?
f. Did the candidate cite appropriate literature in Chapter II to guide the research?
g. Did the candidate correctly articulate the need for the research?
f. Was specific guidance given to the candidate to assist with the completion of the
study?
g. Can the study be done efficiently and effectively?
h. Does the candidate have a grasp of the significance of the study?
i. Does the candidate have sufficient resources to complete the study?
7. The Chair will ask the Committee whether or not the proposed study is appropriate and
defensible as a doctoral prospectus. If the Committee votes “yes”, the Chair will invite
the candidate in and inform her/him of the vote and oversee that all required signatures
are affixed to the prospectus. If the vote is “no”, the Chair will invite the candidate into
the examination room and inform her/him of the vote and the options that are open to the
candidate. If the Committee elects to suspend their vote, the Committee will be required
Revision 6/1/2017 39
to develop a specific set of recommendations for corrective action and a time-line for
their completion before they convene for the formal vote.
8. The Chair will debrief the candidate at the close of the meeting and discuss how to
improve the dissertation prospectus.
9. The Chair will provide the Doctoral Program Director with all signed documentation
required for official acceptance of the dissertation prospectus.
10. The role of the Chair is to conduct the proceedings, ensure fair treatment of the individual
by members of the Committee, and to assess the pertinence of questions and comments,
as well as to take notes on recommendations offered by Committee members (section by
section).
NOTE: Written comments of Committee Members should be left with the Dissertation Committee Chair
Revision 6/1/2017 40
(Sample Prospectus Defense Agenda)
COLUMBUS STATE UNIVERSITY
DOCTORAL PROGRAM IN
CURRICULUM AND LEADERSHIP
DISSERTATION PROSPECTUS DEFENSE
<NAME>
<DATE> , <TIME>
<LOCATION>
PROCESS
I. Introduction and welcome
II. Committee organization (absent the candidate)
III. Candidate presentation (15-20 minutes)
IV. Committee questions
V. Revisit questions
VI. Committee deliberation (absent the candidate)
VII. Applicant notification
Given the topic of the dissertation prospectus and the composition of the Committee, the
following order of questioning is suggested:
1. Methodologist (Dr. )
2. Committee Member (Dr. )
3. Committee Chair (Dr. )
Professional Courtesy: As each member of the Prospectus Committee asks questions of the
candidate, other Committee members may wish to probe the candidate further or to follow up on
a related topic. Please ask the Committee member who is currently questioning for permission to
interrupt their questioning process.
It is recommended that the Prospectus Committee Chair make notes for the candidate so that he
or she may respond without hesitation or interruption to the questions of the Committee
members.
Any edited copies of the candidate's prospectus should be left with the Chair. The candidate
must respond promptly to any recommendations or editorial suggestions.
Revision 6/1/2017 41
APPENDIX G
Columbus State University
Doctoral Program in Education
DISSERTATION PROPOSAL APPROVAL FORM
The dissertation proposal submitted by:
Candidate Name: Candidate ID:
Entitled:
The date of the dissertation proposal defense:
The dissertation proposal has been read and approved by the undersigned. It is recommended for
acceptance to the University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of
Education. The above named student is admitted to candidacy for the Doctor of Education degree
and may proceed with the conduct of the dissertation research process, including but not limited
to, submitting IRB request for approval of the research.
Dissertation Committee Chair (Date)
Dissertation Committee Member (Date)
Dissertation Committee Member (Date) & Methodologist
Dissertation Committee Member (Date)
Recommended by:
Director of Doctoral Program (Date)
Dean, College of Education and Health Professions (Date)
Revision 6/1/2017 42
Dissertation Proposal Evaluation General Learning Outcomes Exceeds Meets Does not meet
Inquiry Skills Doctoral candidates will demonstrate a
sharply focused understanding of inquiry
skills in research methodologies, fitting
within the scope of education.
Excellent
demonstration of
inquiry skills.
Adequate
demonstration of
inquiry skills.
Minimal
demonstration
of inquiry
skills.
Conceptual/ Theoretical Frameworks
Doctoral candidate will demonstrate an
understanding of the major conceptual
frameworks, theoretical underpinnings,
educational issues, and practices needed to
improve teaching, learning, and student
achievement appropriate to the course.
Excellent
demonstration of
the concepts,
theories, issues and
practices to
improve education..
Adequate
demonstration of the
concepts, theories,
issues and practices to
improve teaching,
learning and student
achievement
Minimal
demonstration
of the concepts
and practices
to improve
education.
Applying Research to Practice Doctoral candidate will demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the
knowledge, research, and theories needed to
improve professional practices such as
teaching, learning, and student achievement.
Excellent
demonstration of
knowledge,
research and
theories needed to
improve education.
Adequate
demonstration of
knowledge, research
and theories needed to
improve professional
practices.
Minimal
demonstration
of knowledge,
and research
needed to
improve
education.
Understanding of Research Process
Doctoral candidates will demonstrate the
ability to engage in focused, scholarly
research processes which investigate ways to
improve the practice of teaching, learning,
and student achievement.
Excellent
demonstration of
scholarly research
processes.
Adequate
demonstration of
scholarly research
processes.
Minimal
demonstration
of scholarly
research
processes.
Initial Draft of Dissertation Proposal
Doctoral candidate will present the
dissertation proposal for presentation to a
committee and to gain the knowledge
necessary to complete the dissertation.
Excellent draft of a
dissertation
proposal.
Adequate draft of a
dissertation proposal.
Minimal draft
of a
dissertation
proposal.
Systematic Inquiry Doctoral candidate will produce a proposal
demonstrating the research is worth doing;
s/he is competent to conduct the study; and
the study is carefully planned and can be
executed successfully
Excellent
production of a
proposal. All 3
aspects are
evidenced
exceptionally.
Adequate production of
a proposal. All 3
aspects are evidenced
satisfactorily.
Minimal
production of a
proposal. All 3
aspects are
barely
evidenced.
Review of Literature/References Doctoral candidate will provide
documentation of a minimum of 40
references, at least 25 of which are from peer-
reviewed journal articles. Strict adherence to
APA format throughout the proposal.
Excellent
documentation
from peer-reviewed
journal articles.
Strict adheres to
APA format.
Adequate
documentation from
peer-reviewed journal
articles. Student
strictly adheres to APA
format.
Minimal
documentation
from peer-
reviewed
journals.
Common Conventions of English Usage
Doctoral candidate will employ the common
conventions of academic writing (Sentence
Structure, Word Choice, Grammar, Spelling,
and Writing Mechanics).
Excellent
employment of the
common
conventions of
written English and
formatting.
Adequate employment
of the common
conventions of written
English and formatting.
Minimally
employs the
common
conventions of
written English
and formatting.
Scholarly Treatment of Research
Doctoral candidate will provide a scholarly
treatment of the topic addressing each
element of the assignment.
Excellent scholarly
report addressing
each element of the
assignment in great
detail.
Adequate scholarly
treatment of the topic
in detail.
Inadequate
scholarly
report of
research
concept.
Revision 6/1/2017 43
Columbus State University
Dissertation Proposal Defense
<NAME>
<DATE>, <TIME>
<LOCATION>
Process
I. Introduction and welcome
II. Committee organization (absent the candidate)
III. Candidate presentation (20-30 minutes)
IV. Committee questions
V. Re-direct of any questions
VI. Committee deliberation (absent the candidate)
VII. Applicant notification
Procedures
Given the topic of the dissertation proposal and the composition of the committee, the following
order of questioning is suggested:
1. Dissertation Committee Member; Dr.
2. Dissertation Committee Methodologist; Dr.
3. Committee Chair; Dr.
When the questioning is completed and the committee is ready to deliberate (and vote), the
candidate will be asked to leave the room. If the vote is favorable (a majority of the members
voting), the Chair will ask the members to affix their signatures to the Dissertation Proposal
Transmittal Form. The Chair will invite candidate back to the room, present the results, and
recommend how the candidate should proceed, debriefing the candidate with the suggestions
(recommendations or mandated modifications) which committee members have recommended.
Following the meeting, the Chair will file the signed Dissertation Proposal Transmittal Form
with the Director of the Doctoral Program (with copy placed in the candidate’s file).
Revision 6/1/2017 44
Please note that the Dissertation Committee Chair will make notes and/or a list of
questions regarding the proposal so that the candidate may respond without hesitation or
interruption to the questions of the Dissertation Committee members.
Professional courtesy: As each member of the Dissertation Committee asks
questions of the candidate, other Committee members may wish to probe the candidate
further or to follow up on a related topic. Please ask the Committee member who is
currently questioning for permission to interrupt their questioning process.
Protocols Governing Dissertation Proposal Defense The Dissertation Committee chair will explain the purpose of the meeting and the committee’s
primary tasks.
1. The Dissertation Committee chair will explain how the committee meeting will be
conducted.
2. The Dissertation Committee chair will explain the two options (votes) available to each
committee member: “pass” or “fail.”
3. The candidate will take 20-30 minutes reacquainting the committee with the study. In
this time period, the candidate will also present essential and notable points regarding:
a. the problem studied and why the study was significant.
b. any specific revisions in Chapters I & II that addressed concerns raised by the
Committee at Prospectus Defense
c. “significant” aspects of the literature review reported in Chapter 2.
d. an overview of the research methodology as reported in Chapter 3.
4. Committee members will ask questions. The candidate will respond to the questions
posed. Further discussion, if appropriate, will ensue. When committee-candidate
interactions are complete, the candidate will leave the room while the committee
deliberates.
5. The committee will vote as to the defensibility of the proposal, according to these
recommended criteria:
a. Has the candidate proceeded according to the Doctoral Candidate Handbook
requirements and the recommendations of the Chair and Methodologist?
b. Were the committee’s concerns addressed to every member’s satisfaction?
c. Did the candidate organize the study around the research questions?
d. Was the description of the standard statistical procedures proposed appropriate?
Revision 6/1/2017 45
e. Did the candidate accurately portray the importance of the study in such a manner
that it makes a contribution to the field?
f. Did the candidate cite appropriate literature in Chapter II to guide the research?
g. Did the candidate correctly articulate the research methodology?
h. Was specific guidance given to the candidate to assist with the completion of the
study?
i. Can the study be done efficiently and effectively within the prescribed time
parameters?
j. Does the candidate have a grasp of the significance of the study within the constraints
prescribed by the committee?
k. Does the candidate have sufficient resources to complete the study?
6. Outcomes of the Dissertation Proposal Defense
a. Committee Approval and No Further Revisions
b. Minor revisions to the proposal
Revisions are reviewed and approved only by the Dissertation Chair. The
Dissertation Proposal Transmittal form is not signed by the Chair and the Committee
members until the written proposal is acceptable.
c. Major revisions to the proposal and possible repeat of the dissertation proposal
defense
(1) Revisions must be reviewed and approved by the full Committee. The
Dissertation Proposal Transmittal form is not signed by any Committee member
until the proposal is acceptable. The Dissertation Proposal Transmittal form is
not signed by the Committee until the written proposal is acceptable.
(2) Possible repeat of the dissertation proposal defense.
7. The candidate will be invited back into the room and be informed of the vote and,
depending on the vote, how to proceed.
Note to Committee: Please leave the Chair with your edited copy of the
candidate’s proposal. The candidate must respond very
quickly to any of your recommendations or editorial
suggestions.
Revision 6/1/2017 46
APPENDIX H
Columbus State University
Institutional Review Board
Application for Institutional Review Board Review See Website http://research.columbusstate.edu/irb/
Part I – To be completed by researcher:
General Instructions for Completion of Protocol: Unless otherwise instructed, type all
information in the area below each question, using as much space as necessary.
I. Principal Investigator(s):
Name: CSU ID: E-Mail:
Mailing Address: Phone:
Name: CSU ID: E-Mail:
Mailing Address: Phone:
Name: CSU ID: E-Mail:
Mailing Address: Phone:
Faculty Supervisor (if applicable): Department:
Faculty Supervisor E-Mail: Phone:
II. Title of Project:
III. Dates of Proposed Research: Start: End:
IV. Source of Funding for the Protocol:
Revision 6/1/2017 47
V. Purpose of the Study: In a brief statement, clearly describe your research reason for
performing this study, including: 1) all of the objectives of the study (including hypothesis when
applicable), and 2) the anticipated outcomes.
VI. Description of Participants and Recruitment:
Number of Participants: Age of Participants: 18 and older under 18 (specify age(s)):
How are participants to be selected and recruited?
What is your relationship to the participants?
Compensation: If compensation is to be awarded for participation in the study describe below,
be specific. If no compensation will be given, state “none”.
VII. Methodology: Explain exactly what the participants will be asked to do. Include the
amount of time that each participant will need to devote to the study. Insert copies of any
questions or surveys that will be given to the participants. Researchers should take care not to
collect any data, especially demographics, unless doing so is necessary and they have specific
plans to analyze or otherwise make use of the data. Explain how each variable measured
supports the purpose of your study. If this is part of a thesis or dissertation, insert the
Methodology section of the thesis or dissertation proposal below. Use as much space as
necessary.
Revision 6/1/2017 48
VIII. Risks of Participation: List all physical, economic, social, and/or psychological risks. If
the risks of harm to a participant are not greater than those ordinarily encountered in daily life
or during the performance of routine physical or psychological examinations, then state: “No
more than minimal risk.” If, however, the protocol involves more than minimal risk, specify
procedures for protecting participants.
IX. Benefits: Describe the potential benefits to the participants and/or others as a direct result
of this research project.
X. Informed Consent Process: Explain the process through which you will provide the
potential participant all the information they need to decide whether or not to participate.
Append a copy of any written forms, cover letters, verbal scripts, and/or assent scripts that you
will use. Waiver of the informed consent process is limited to research involving the collection
or study of existing data, publicly available information, and observation of unmanipulated
public behavior where data is recorded in such a manner that identifiers cannot be linked to
individuals.
a. What types of information will be collected? Attach a copy of all survey instruments, interview
questions, word or activity tests, etc.
b. Will demographic information be collected? Yes No List all demographic
information that will be collected, if applicable:
c. Will participants be identifiable to anyone? If so, explain how their identity will be
safeguarded:
d. For what purpose is the information being collected (e.g., publication, thesis)?
Revision 6/1/2017 49
XI. Electronic Signatures: This page may be submitted in hard copy if necessary. It may be
faxed.
Principal Investigator(s):
I understand and will abide by federal policy concerning human subjects’ research. In addition, I
agree to:
•Obtain approval from the IRB prior to instituting any change in project protocol.
•Inform the IRB immediately of any unforeseen risks or adverse effects.
•Keep signed consent forms, if required, from each participant for the duration of the project,
including publications.
•Submit a Continuation/Conclusion report at 12- month or shorter time intervals (as indicated on
the approval letter).
I accept the responsibilities indicated above. I have attached a copy of my training certificate.
Signed: Date:
Principal Investigator 1
Signed:
Principal Investigator 2
Faculty Advisor (if student-only project)
Date:
I have collaborated in the development of the research proposal described in the attached and
have reviewed all of the information enclosed and will oversee the work described. I will
endeavor to ensure that all of the PI responsibilities are fulfilled. I have read the protocol
submitted for this project for content, clarity, and methodology.
Faculty Advisor (Please Print) Faculty Advisor’s Signature Date
Part II - To be completed by the IRB:
The proposed research has been reviewed by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). According to
the Federal common rule regulation, it is designated:
Exempt
Expedited
Full Board Review
Conditional approval with required modifications/recommendations.
Signature of IRB Chairperson or Member:
Date: _
Approved
Not Approved
Revision 6/1/2017 50
APPENDIX I
Dissertation Process
Dissertation Chapter Description of Major Contents Courses* Document
STEP 1 – Prospectus Development and Approval
Chapter I
Introduction Introduction
Statement of the Problem
Research Questions
Chapter II
Literature Review Literature Review
Defend Prospectus
STEP 2 – Proposal Development and Approval
Chapters I and II (revised from
prospectus) See above
Chapter III
Methodology Research Design
Population and Sampling
Instrumentation
Procedures (Ethics and Data
Collection)
Data Analysis
How Results will be
Reported
Evaluation of Research
Methods
Defend Proposal
Submit IRB Application and Obtain IRB Approval
Submit Proposal for Approval by School District (if applicable)
STEP 3 – Study Completion, Dissertation Development and Approval
Chapters I, II, and III (revised after
study) See above
Chapter IV
Results Results in narrative and
tabular form
Reported by research
question, etc.
Chapter V
Summary Summary
Interpretations
Conclusions
Practical Implications
Limitations
Recommendations for Future
Study
Defend Dissertation
STEP 4 – Final Dissertation Formatting and Submission
All Chapters Formatted (include any revisions recommended from
Defense)
Submit copies of final dissertation
as instructed.
*You will work on the specified chapters in designated courses, but in addition, you will work with your chair for all five chapters
and your methodologist chapters III and IV outside of your coursework
Revision 6/1/2017 51
Columbus State University
College of Education and Health Professions
APPLICATION FOR DISSERTATION DEFENSE
____________________________________ ______________________ Student CSU ID Number
__________________________ ___________________________ _____________________________
Date Time Location
______________________________________________________________________________________
Title of Dissertation:
Abstract: (Copy and paste Abstract here or attach as separate page.)
_________________________________ ______________________________ ________________ Student Signature Date
____________________________________ __________________________________ __________________
Dissertation Committee Chair Signature Date
Revision 6/1/2017 52
Columbus State University
Doctoral Program in Education
FINAL DISSERTATION APPROVAL FORM
The dissertation submitted by:
Candidate Name: Candidate ID:
Entitled:
The date of the final dissertation defense:
The dissertation proposal has been read and approved by the undersigned. It is recommended for
acceptance to the University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of
Education. The candidate must make corrections and submit for edit review within fifteen (15)
working days following successful defense.
Dissertation Committee Chair (Date)
Dissertation Committee Member (Date)
Dissertation Committee Member (Date) & Methodologist
Dissertation Committee Member (Date)
Recommended by:
Director of Doctoral Program (Date) ________________________________________________ _________________________
Director, COEHP Graduate Studies (Date)
Dean, College of Education and Health Professions (Date)
ELECTRONIC COPY: All dissertations will be submitted in electronic format
for posting on the CSU ePress repository when final approval is obtained.
cc: Associate Provost for Graduate School
Revision 6/1/2017 53
Dissertation Evaluation Rubric
Ideas and Content Does Not Meet
Expectations
Approaching
Expectations Meets Expectations Exemplary
The topic is not defined.
To extract meaning from
the text, the reader must
make inferences based on
sketchy or missing
details. The writing
reflects more than one of
the following problems.
One or more of the
following may be
reflected in the writing:
a. The writer is still in
search of a topic or
has not begun to
define the topic in a
meaningful way.
b. Ideas are very limited
or unclear;
inaccuracies are
apparent.
c. The reviewed
literature is minimal
and does not cover the
topic.
d. The writing does not
draw on knowledge of
the important issues in
the area of study. The
text may be
repetitious or may
read like a collection
of disconnected
random thoughts.
e. A line of reasoning
has not been clearly
developed. The writer
often strays off topic.
It is difficult to see
where the writer is
headed.
The topic is defined, even
though the development is
still basic.
One or more of the
following may be
reflected in the writing:
a. Topic(s) is loosely
based on current or
future leadership
problems.
b. Ideas are reasonably
clear, though they may
not be detailed,
accurate, or expanded
enough to show in-
depth understanding or
development.
c. The reviewed
literature generally
covers the topic; gaps
may be evident.
d. The writing draws on
knowledge of the
important issues in the
area of study;
however, the ideas are
discussed in ways that
make it difficult to
assess their
contribution to the
development of the
topic.
e. A line of reasoning has
not been clearly
developed. The writer
generally stays on
topic but does not
develop a clear
theme(s).It is easy to
see where the writer is
headed, though more
information is needed
to “fill in the blanks.”
The topic is clearly
defined; the topic
development reflects
knowledge of the issues
in the area of study.
All of the following are
reflected in the writing:
a. Topic(s) is based on
current or future
leadership problems.
b. Ideas are presented
clearly and contribute
to the development of
the topic.
c. The reviewed
literature sufficiently
covers the existing
research base for the
topic.
d. The writing reflects
knowledge of the
important issues in the
area of study; the
discussion of these
reflects some insight
into them.
e. A clearly developed
line of reasoning is
demonstrated through
specific details that
support the central
idea and develop a
clear theme(s).
The topic is very well
defined; topic
development
demonstrates critical and
creative constructions /of
the issues of the area of
study.
All of the following are
reflected in the writing:
a. Topic(s) is based on
current or future
leadership problems.
b. Ideas are presented
clearly; critical
analysis of the ideas
contributes to the
argument presented or
viewpoint supported
with regard to the
topic.
c. The reviewed
literature fully covers
the existing research
base for the topic.
d. The writing clearly
and accurately reflects
knowledge of the
important issues in the
area of study; the
discussion of these
issues reflects insight
into them.
e. A well-developed line
of reasoning is
demonstrated through
the logical
construction of
arguments.
Revision 6/1/2017 54
Organization Does Not Meet
Expectations
Approaching
Expectations Meets Expectations Exemplary
The organization does not
conform to the
requirements put forth in
the Doctoral Student
Handbook. The writing
lacks a clear sense of
direction. Ideas and
details seem strung
together in a loose or
random fashion; there is
no identifiable internal
structure.
One or more of the
following may be
reflected in the writing:
a.There is no introduction
to set up what follows,
and/or there is no
conclusion to tie-up
loose ends and give
the reader a sense of
closure.
b. The order, structure,
or presentation of
information is
disjointed.
c. The connections
between ideas are
confusing or not even
present.
d. Sequencing needs
work.
e. Details are misplaced.
f. Pacing is not controlled.
The writer includes
extraneous discussion or
does not include enough
discussion.
g. The organization does
not support the main
idea(s) or theme(s).
The organization
conforms to the
requirements put forth in
the Doctoral Student
Handbook. The
organizational structure
within the major sections
is not strong enough to
move the reader through
the paper without
confusion.
One or more of the
following may be
reflected in the writing:
a.The introduction does
not sufficiently
capture the reader’s
interest or set up what
follows, and/or the
conclusion does not
tie-up loose ends
leaving the reader
without a full sense of
closure.
b. The order, structure,
or presentation of
information is at times
disjointed.
c. Transitions often link
ideas in a logical
order; at other times
connections between
ideas seem fuzzy.
d. Sequencing shows
some logic
e. Some details seem
misplaced.
f. Pacing is fairly well
controlled, though the
writer sometimes
moves ahead too
quickly or spends too
much time on details
that do not matter.
g. The organization
sometimes supports
the main idea(s) or
theme(s). At other
times the reader
perceives need for
transition.
The organization
conforms to the
requirements put forth in
the Doctoral Student
Handbook. The
organizational structure
within the major sections
is strong enough to move
the reader through the
paper without confusion.
All of the following are
reflected in the writing:
a. The introduction
captures the reader’s
interest and sets up
what follows, and the
conclusion leaves the
reader with some
sense of closure.
b. The order, structure,
or presentation of
information is logical
and progresses
deliberately
throughout the paper.
c. Transitions link ideas
in a logical order.
d. Sequencing is logical
and effective.
e. Details fit where they
are placed.
f. Pacing is controlled
and contributes to the
arguments presented
in the paper.
g. The organization
flows smoothly and
supports the main
idea(s) or theme(s).
The organization
conforms to the
requirements put forth in
the Doctoral Student
Handbook. The
organizational structure
within the major sections
enhances the central
idea(s) or theme(s).
All of the following are
reflected in the writing:
a.The introduction
captures the reader’s
interest and sets up
what follows, and the
conclusion leaves the
reader with a full
sense of closure.
b. The order, structure,
or presentation of
information is
cohesive, enabling the
reader to move easily
through the text.
c. Thoughtful transitions
clearly link ideas in a
logical order.
d. Sequencing is logical
and effective.
e. Details fit where they
are placed and are
applied to multiple
ideas.
f. Pacing is very well
controlled; the writer
knows when to
elaborate and when
such elaboration
becomes cumbersome.
g. The organization
flows smoothly,
supports the main
idea(s) or theme(s),
and reflects the body
of literature about a
given area of inquiry.
Revision 6/1/2017 55
Writing Style and Conventions Does Not Meet
Expectations
Approaching
Expectations Meets Expectations Exemplary
The writer demonstrates
limited control over
standard writing
conventions. Errors in
spelling, punctuation,
capitalization, usage and
grammar, paragraphing,
and/or APA formatting
repeatedly distract the
reader and make the text
difficult to read.
One or more of the
following may be reflected
in the writing:
a. APA formatting and
styling are frequently
incorrect.
b. References are
frequently cited
incorrectly in the text
or reference list.
c. Errors in grammar or
usage are very
noticeable and affect
meaning and detract
from the writer’s style.
d. Internal punctuation
(e.g., commas,
apostrophes, semi-
colons; dashes, colons,
parentheses, quotation
marks) is frequently
missing or wrong. This
contributes to
misunderstanding and
stylistic concerns.
e. Paragraphing is
missing, irregular, or so
frequent that it has no
relationship to the
organizational structure
of the text.
f. No clear style is
evident. The reader
must read once to
decode, then again for
meaning.
The writer demonstrates
reasonable control over a
limited range of standard
writing conventions.
Conventions are sometimes
handled well and enhance
readability; at other times
errors are distracting and
impair readability.
One or more of the
following may be reflected
in the writing:
a. APA formatting and
styling are generally
correct. Errors exist and
are repeated throughout
the paper.
b. References are
generally cited
correctly, but some
errors exist in the text
or reference list.
c. Grammar and usage are
usually correct; some
decoding is needed to
comprehend the paper.
d. Internal punctuation
(e.g., commas,
apostrophes, semi-
colons; dashes, colons,
parentheses, quotation
marks) is sometimes
missing or wrong. This
contributes to possible
misunderstanding and
stylistic concerns.
e. Paragraphing is
attempted but may run
together or begin in the
wrong places.
f. A writing style is
emerging, but writing
errors detract from the
style.
The writer demonstrates
a good grasp of standard
writing conventions.
These conventions are
used effectively to
enhance readability.
All of the following are
reflected in the writing:
a. APA format and
styling are correct;
minimal errors exist.
b. References are cited
correctly in the text
and reference list.
c. Grammar and usage
are correct and
contribute to clarity
and style.
d. Internal punctuation
(e.g., commas,
apostrophes, semi-
colons; dashes,
colons, parentheses,
quotation marks) is
correct. Minimal
errors exist.
e. Paragraphing tends to
be sound and
reinforces the
organizational
structure.
f. A clear writing style
is evident.
g. Synthesizing of
literature is evident.
The writer demonstrates
an excellent grasp of
standard writing
conventions. These
conventions are used
effectively to enhance
readability.
All of the following are
reflected in the writing:
a. APA format and
styling are correct;
no errors exist.
b. References are cited
correctly in the text
and reference list.
Grammar and usage
are correct and
contribute to clarity
and style.
c. Internal punctuation
(e.g., commas,
apostrophes, semi-
colons; dashes,
colons, parentheses,
quotation marks) is
correct. No errors
exist.
d. Paragraphing is
sound and reinforces
the organizational
structure.
e. Synthesizing of
literature is clearly
evident.
f. A clear writing style
is evident, and the
writer manipulates
conventions –
especially grammar –
for stylistic effect.
Revision 6/1/2017 56
Critical Thinking Does Not Meet
Expectations
Approaching
Expectations Meets Expectations Exemplary
Higher order thinking is
not present or is present at
a minimal level.
One or more of the
following may be
reflected in the writing:
a. Little or no
consideration is given
to others’ research.
This research is
consistently reported
rather than
synthesized.
b. Arguments connecting
existing research and
theories to the
research topic have
not been developed
c. Supporting theory is
not presented or not
connected to the
writer’s ideas.
Higher order thinking is
present but not
consistently demonstrated
throughout the paper.
One or more of the
following may be
reflected in the writing:
a. Consideration is given
to others’ research;
this research is
frequently reported
rather than
synthesized.
b. Arguments connecting
existing research and
theories to the research
topic have begun to be
developed and are not
clearly tied to the
writer’s ideas or the
research topic.
c. Supporting theory(ies)
is(are) presented but is
(are) not explicitly tied
to the writer’s ideas.
Major omission of
existing supporting
theory exists.
Higher order thinking is
consistently demonstrated
throughout the paper.
All of the following are
reflected in the writing:
a. Reasonable
consideration is given
to others’ research;
this research has been
analyzed and
synthesized.
b. Arguments connecting
existing research and
theories to the
research topic have
been developed and
are tied to the writer’s
ideas and the research
topic.
c. Supporting theory(ies)
is(are) analyzed,
discussed, and tied to
the writer’s ideas.
Minimal gaps in
existing supporting
theory exist.
Higher order thinking is
consistently demonstrated
throughout the paper and
results in an original,
creative treatment of the
topic.
All of the following are
reflected in the writing:
a. Thoughtful
consideration is given
to others’ research;
this research has been
thoroughly analyzed
and synthesized.
b. Arguments connecting
existing research and
theories to the
research topic have
been developed and
are clearly tied to the
writer’s ideas and the
research topic.
c. Supporting theory(ies)
is(are) thoroughly
analyzed and
discussed and tied to
the writer’s ideas. If
appropriate, existing
gaps in theory are
identified.
Revision 6/1/2017 57
FINAL DISSERTATION DEFENSE
< candidate name >
<date>
<time>
<location>
PROTOCOL
I. Call Meeting to Order
II. Introductions
III. Purpose of Meeting
IV. Committee Organization
V. Defense
VI. Disposition and Notification
Given the topic of the dissertation and the composition of the committee, the following order of
questioning will be used:
1. Educational Leadership Committee Member (Dr. ????)
2. Methodologist (Dr. ????)
3. Committee Member (Dr. ????? )
4. Committee Chair (Dr. ?????)
Revision 6/1/2017 58
Requirements for Dissertation Defense
<NAME>
<Date>
<Time>
Oral Defense of the Dissertation: Forms, Committee Discussion and Outcomes
At the oral defense of the dissertation, the following conditions must be met:
1. Forms: At the oral dissertation defense, the candidate must bring the
“Dissertation Approval” form. These are given to the Dissertation Chair.
2. Committee Discussion, Vote, and Outcomes of the Oral Dissertation Defense:
a. A formal discussion in private is held by the dissertation committee.
b. A vote of the committee is required to obtain approval as to whether the
candidate has passed the Oral Defense. A majority of the committee
members must be present, and agree that the candidate has passed the oral
defense of the dissertation.
c. Outcomes of the Oral Dissertation Defense
i. Candidate passes the oral defense. The candidate then proceeds to
finalizing the written preparation of the dissertation. The "oral"
defense leads to the final written dissertation. The final written
dissertation including completion of all other doctoral requirements
will constitute completion of the dissertation. This is supervised by
the Dissertation Chair.
ii. Candidate does not pass the Oral Dissertation defense. The
candidate must meet with the Dissertation Chair to address the
elements of the defense and/or written dissertation that need
corrections. After the corrections have been made, the Committee
Chair will then determine the candidate’s readiness to orally defend
the dissertation and the oral defense process will begin again.
Revision 6/1/2017 59
Protocol for Dissertation Defense
<NAME>
<Date>
The following items will serve as the guiding protocols for
conducting the Oral Defense of the Dissertation:
The dissertation chair will call the meeting to order, introduce guests as appropriate, explain the
purpose of the meeting and the committee’s primary tasks and inquire as to whether or not the
meeting should proceed.
1. The dissertation chair will provide a protocol for the conduct of the meeting to all
members and candidate.
2. The dissertation chair will explain how the committee meeting will be conducted.
3. The dissertation committee will deliberate absent the candidate and visitors concerning
the appropriateness of the defense and the written dissertation.
4. The dissertation chair will invite the candidate and visitors back into the deliberation
room and explain the voting options available to each committee member.
5. The candidate will take 25-30 minutes reacquainting the committee with the study. In this
time period, s/he will also present essential and notable points regarding:
a. the problem studied and why the study was significant.
b. any specific revisions in Chapters 1-3 that addressed concerns raised at the
proposal defense.
c. “significant” aspects of the data reported in Chapter 4.
d. “implications” of the results as reported in Chapter 5.
e. the important findings emerging from the study will be explained.
f. any major “conclusions” will be described and related directly to the original
research questions.
6. Committee members will ask questions in turn, as set forth in #2 above. The candidate
will respond to the questions posed. A second round of questions will be permitted the
Committee. Further discussion, if appropriate, will ensue.
Revision 6/1/2017 60
7. The role of the Chair is to conduct the proceedings, ensure fair treatment of the candidate
by members of the Committee, and to assess the pertinence of questions and comments
concerning the dissertation. Questions from the audience may be taken, but the questions
are directed through the Dissertation Chair who will determine whether or not the
candidate will answer.
8. When the questioning is complete and the committee is ready to deliberate (and vote), the
candidate and all visitors will be asked to leave the room.
9. The committee will vote as to the defensibility of the dissertation according to these
criteria:
a. Has the candidate following the recommendations according to what was agreed
to in his/her approved proposal, as modified by any subsequently approved
amendments, agreements, and discussions?
b. Was the study conducted in an appropriate manner? Were the committee’s
concerns addressed to every member’s satisfaction?
c. Did the candidate organize her/his analysis and results around his/her research
questions? Was the analysis acceptable, appropriate and complete?
d. Was the description of the statistical procedures used appropriate? Were any
important findings or conclusions overlooked?
e. Did he/she accurately state the implications that can be drawn from the results?
Were the important strengths and limitations of the study identified and discussed
in light of future research?
f. Did he/she point out consistencies and inconsistencies in the results with those in
the literature cited in Chapter 2?
g. Did he/she correctly speculate on the meaning(s) of the results?
h. Was specific guidance given to future researchers with an interest in examining
this problem?
10. If the vote is favorable (majority vote of those so voting), the dissertation chair will ask
the members to affix their signatures to the Approval of Dissertation form.
11. The dissertation chair will invite the candidate and the audience back to the room, inform
her/him of the results, and recommend how he/she should proceed, debriefing him/her
with the suggestions (recommendations or mandated modifications) which committee
members have recommended.
TO THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS: Please leave the chair with your edited copy of the
candidate’s dissertation. The candidate must respond very quickly to any of your
recommendations or editorial suggestions.
Revision 6/1/2017 61
Please note that the Dissertation Chair will make notes for the candidate so that she/he may
respond without hesitation or interruption to the questions of the Committee members.
Professional courtesy: As each member of the Dissertation Committee asks questions of the
candidate, other Committee members may wish to probe the candidate further, or to follow up
on a related topic. Please ask the Committee member who is currently questioning for
permission to interrupt their questioning process.
Note: Written comments of committee members should be left with the
dissertation chair.
Committee: Thank you for your valuable contribution to this process. Without your
assistance <candidate name> would not be here today.
Evaluation of Final Defense
Component Does not
Meet
Meets Exceeds
Good understanding of the general theoretical foundation of the research area
Good understanding of the general research methodology
Good report of findings, conclusions and implications
Answered research questions in complete and scholarly fashion
Competent and effective presentation
Revision 6/1/2017 62
APPENDIX J
Thesis and Dissertation Submission Approval Form (For form go to: https://library.columbusstate.edu/docs/csu_etd_approval.pdf)
Student Name:
909 Number:
Major:
Degree Name:
Document Title:
The CSU Graduate Council has adopted a Thesis and Dissertation Guide. See p.3 of the guide for specific requirements for submitting the thesis. Doctoral students should see the Dissertation Guide. The CSU Libraries requires two copies of each thesis or dissertation printed on 100% cotton bond paper. These will be delivered to the library by the CSU Print Shop. The two library copies will be made public – one in the circulating collection and the other in Archives. All theses and dissertations submitted to the library will be converted to an electronic (digital) format and posted on CSU ePress, the library’s institutional repository.
Release Options
Check one of the following to indicate your consent to have the library host your electronic thesis or dissertation:
1. Provide open and immediate public access to the Thesis or Dissertation using the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/)
2. Embargo: restrict public access for 2 years. Requires written documentation of patentability, confidentiality agreements, or restrictive prepublication/post publication policies. Requires PRIOR approval by the Associate Provost and Director of Graduate Studies. Written requests including documentation should be submitted separately to the Director of Graduate Studies at least 4 weeks before final submission date.
Student Agreement
I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee.
Student Signature: Date:
Thesis/Dissertation Chair: Date:
Print Thesis/Dissertation Chair Name:
To be submitted to Library.
Revision 6/1/2017 63
APPENDIX K
SUBMISSION OF FINAL DISSERTATION
As set forth in the Handbook for Doctoral Studies in Education (Columbus State University, 2016),
following a successful defense, the candidate is required to make revisions as outlined by the dissertation
committee and submit the revised copy to the Director of the Doctoral Program for review within thirty (30)
working days following the defense. The Director of the Doctoral Program will submit a digital final copy of
the dissertation along with the completed Final Dissertation Approval Form to the Director of COEHP Graduate
Programs, the Associate Provost for Graduate Studies, the Dean of Libraries, and the Columbus State University
Print Shop for printing and binding.
Responsibility of the Director of the Doctoral Program
The Director of the Doctoral Program is responsible for ensuring that the dissertation is submitted with
corrections as outlined by the dissertation committee within thirty (30) working days of the successful defense.
Candidates who have successfully defended dissertations, but have not completed revisions as outlined may
participate in a graduation ceremony but will not receive a degree until final revisions are submitted and
approved. In extenuating circumstances, the Director of the Doctoral Program may approve additional time for
the candidate to make corrections for an additional fifteen (15) working days. As part of this process, the
Director of the Doctoral program may require that the dissertation be reviewed by editors approved by COEHP
Graduate Studies for formatting. Additional time for corrections may only be approved by the Dean of the
COEHP. Within ten (10) working days from receipt of the final copy of the dissertation, it is the responsibility
of the Director of the Doctoral Program to submit a digital copy of the dissertation along with the completed
Final Dissertation Approval Form to the Director of COEHP Graduate Programs, the Associate Provost for
Graduate Studies, and the Dean of Libraries. At the same time, the Director of the Doctoral Program will
forward the final approved copy of the dissertation to the Columbus State University for printing and binding.
Revision 6/1/2017 64
Eight copies will be printed and distributed as follows: Library (2 copies), Chair of the Dissertation Committee
(1 copy), Committee Members (1 copy each), COEHP Archives (1 copy), student (2 copies).
The Director of the Doctoral Program is responsible for ensuring that the printed bound copies of the
dissertation are disseminated upon printing. The printed, bound copies should be disseminated within two
months of forwarding to the Columbus State University Print Shop.
Responsibility of the Dean of Libraries
The Dean of Libraries is responsible for maintaining a digital copy of the dissertation approved by the
Director of the Doctoral Program, the Director of COEHP Graduate Studies, and the Dean of the College of
Education. Additionally, the Dean of Libraries will maintain a bound copy of the approved dissertation for
scholarly review and research.
Responsibility of the Dean of COEHP
The Dean of COEHP is responsible for approving the final copy of the dissertation and ensuring that the
Director of the Doctoral Program submits a digital copy of the dissertation along with the completed Final
Dissertation Approval Form to the Director of COEHP Graduate Programs, the Associate Provost for Graduate
Studies, the Dean of Libraries and that the Director of the Doctoral Program forward the final approved copy of
the dissertation to the Columbus State University for printing and binding The Director of the Doctoral Program
will make a report regarding dissertation submittal to the Dean of COEHP at a regularly monthly meeting.
During the annual evaluation process, the Director of the Doctoral Program will submit a written report
regarding disposition of dissertations to include a list of candidates making successful defenses, number of
dissertations printed, and location of printed and digital copies of final copies of dissertations.
Responsibility of the Director of COEHP Graduate Studies
The Director of COEHP Graduate Studies is responsible for maintaining a final copy of the dissertation
in n COEHP Archives.
Revision 6/1/2017 65
APPENDIX L
PETITION FOR APPEAL
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROFESSIONS
GRADUATE COUNCIL
COLUMBUS STATE UNIVERSITY
DIRECTIONS:
Refer to the on-line CSU Catalog (www.columbusstate.edu) to secure the most current information regarding university
(CSU) and program (COEHP) specific admission requirements (Academic rules/regulations). If you have an admission
deficiency, you should first make efforts to correct the deficiency. Admissions appeals will then be considered if a student
retains a minimal deficiency in one requirement that may be compensated by strengths in the remaining admission
requirements if the deficiency is not a requirement mandated by a related accrediting, licensing, certifying or governing
entity.
PETITION DOCUMENTS: Letter of statement concerning appeal from Coordinator of the desired program of study (Under separate cover);
Letter of support or affirmation from a former college/university faculty member or advisor;
Letter from petitioner clearly stating the reason for the appeal and/or exception to existing
academic rules and regulations;
_______Undergraduate/graduate transcripts; and
Signature of the Department Chair of the desired program of study (Department of Teacher Education or
Counseling, Educational Leadership and Professional Studies).
COVER INFORMATION/SIGNATURES:
Petitioner’s Name: ____________________________________________________________________
Mailing Address: ____________________________________________________________________
Email: ______________________________________________________________________________
Telephone Numbers: (W) (H) __________________________________
Student Identification Number (CSU ID #): ________________________________________________
GRE Scores Q: V: ____________ Writing Assessment: ______
Undergraduate GPA: Graduate GPA: _________
Desired Program of Study/Degree: _____________________
Required information is complete and correct:
_________________________________________________ _________________
Petitioner’s Signature Date
Appeal documents are complete:
_________________________________________________ _________________
Department Chair’s Signature Date
RETURNED
COMPLETED
APPLICATION TO:
Office of Graduate Studies
Frank Brown Hall - 3124
Columbus State University
4225 University Avenue
Columbus, GA 31907
FAX (706) 568-5088
Revision 6/1/2017 66
APPENDIX M (1 of 3) College of Education and Health Professions
Ed.D. Curriculum and Leadership Degree (Leadership Track) Progress Sheet
Name: _____________________________________CSU I.D. No: _______________________ Home Phone ( )________________________ Highest Degree Earned ______
RESEARCH (15 hours) Hrs. Course Taken Term/Yr. Grade
EDUL 8715 Doctoral Seminar 3
EDUF 8126 Introduction to Statistical Methods in Education 3
EDUF 8127 Quantitative Research Methods in Education 3
EDUF 8117 Qualitative Research Methods 3
EDUF 8125 Mixed Methods Research in Education 3
SPECIALIZATION** EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP (24 hours) Hrs. Course Taken Term/Yr. Grade
EDUL 8102 Leading for Change 3
EDUL 8104 Supervision of Teaching and Learning 3
EDUL 8105 Leadership Theory 3
EDUL 8126 Politics of Education 3
EDUL 8127 Creating Resilient Leaders 3
EDUL 8108 Applications of Neurological Research to Student Learning 3
EDUL 8209 Organizational Theory: Implications for Student Performance 3
EDUL 8115 Policy and Ethics 3
DISSERTATION (12 hours) Hrs. Course Taken Term/Yr. Grade
EDUF 8000 Prospectus 0
EDUF 8129 Developing the Dissertation Proposal 3
EDUF 7999/8999 Dissertation 3
EDUF 7999/8999 Dissertation 3
EDUF 7999/8999 Dissertation 3
ELECTIVES (12 Approved Semester Hours in Discipline)
Student must provide course descriptions /syllabi for approval of transfer credit.
Hrs. Course Taken Term/Yr. Grade
3
3
3
3
TOTAL Program Semesters Hours 63
Comments: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Advisor: _________________________________________ Date: ___________________________
Verified by: ______________________________________ Director of Doctoral Program: _________________________________
Revision 6/1/2017 67
APPENDIX L (2 of 3) College of Education and Health Professions
Ed.D. Curriculum and Leadership Degree (Curriculum Track) Progress Sheet
Name: _____________________________________CSU I.D. No: _______________________ Home Phone ( )________________________ Highest Degree Earned ______
RESEARCH (15 hours) Hrs. Course Taken Term/Yr. Grade
EDUL 8715 Doctoral Seminar 3
EDUF 8126 Introduction to Statistical Methods in Education 3
EDUF 8127 Quantitative Research Methods in Education 3
EDUF 8117 Qualitative Research Methods 3
EDUF 8125 Mixed Methods Research in Education 3
SPECIALIZATION** CURRICULUM (24 hours) Hrs. Course Taken Term/Yr. Grade
EDUF 8112 Curriculum Design and Evaluation 3
EDCI 8157 Quality Assessment and Evaluation 3
EDCI 8115 Diversity in Education 3
EDCI 8116 Trends and Issues in Curriculum 3
EDCI 7157 Curriculum Development and Reform 3
EDCI 8117 Professional Development and Learning 3
EDUL 8108 Applications of Neurological Research to Student Learning 3
EDCI 8555 Selected Topics: Policy Perspectives on Curric, Teaching 3
DISSERTATION (12 hours) Hrs. Course Taken Term/Yr. Grade
EDUF 8000 Prospectus 0
EDUF 8129 Developing the Dissertation Proposal 3
EDUF 7999/8999 Dissertation 3
EDUF 7999/8999 Dissertation 3
EDUF 7999/8999 Dissertation 3
ELECTIVES (12 Approved Semester Hours in Discipline)
Student must provide course descriptions /syllabi for approval of transfer credit.
Hrs. Course Taken Term/Yr. Grade
3
3
3
3
TOTAL Program Semesters Hours 63
Comments: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Advisor: _________________________________________ Date: ___________________________
Verified by: ______________________________________ Director of Doctoral Program: _________________________________
Revision 6/1/2017 68
APPENDIX L (3 of 3) College of Education and Health Professions
Ed.D. Curriculum and Leadership Degree (Higher Education Track) Progress Sheet
Name: _____________________________________CSU I.D. No: _______________________ Home Phone ( )________________________ Highest Degree Earned ______
RESEARCH (15 hours) Hrs. Course Taken Term/Yr. Grade
EDHE 8722 Doctoral Seminar 3
EDUF 8126 Introduction to Statistical Methods in Education 3
EDUF 8127 Quantitative Research Methods in Education 3
EDUF 8117 Qualitative Research Methods 3
EDUF 8125 Mixed Methods Research in Education 3
SPECIALIZATION** HIGHER EDUCATION (24 hours) Hrs. Course Taken Term/Yr. Grade
EDHE 8101 Introduction to Higher Education 3
EDHE 8102 Academic Affairs 3
EDHE 8112 Higher Education Student Services 3
EDHE 8123 Research in Higher Education 3
EDHE 8125 Educational Evaluation 3
EDHE 8110 Policy and Politics of Higher Education 3
EDHE 8720 Current Issues in Higher Education 3
EDHE 8103 Finance and Administrative Affairs 3
DISSERTATION (12 hours) Hrs. Course Taken Term/Yr. Grade
EDUF 8000 Prospectus 0
EDUF 8129 Developing the Dissertation Proposal 3
EDUF 7999/8999 Dissertation 3
EDUF 7999/8999 Dissertation 3
EDUF 7999/8999 Dissertation 3
ELECTIVES (12 Approved Semester Hours in Discipline)
Student must provide course descriptions /syllabi for approval of transfer credit.
Hrs. Course Taken Term/Yr. Grade
3
3
3
3
TOTAL Program Semesters Hours 63
Comments: _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Advisor: _________________________________________ Date: ___________________________
Verified by: ______________________________________ Director of Doctoral Program: _________________________________
Recommended