DISTRICT NAME HERE Using Student Growth Percentiles (Option A)

DISTRICT NAME HERE

Using Student Growth Percentiles (Option A)

Warm Up

The median is the middle number in a sequence of numbers

On your table is a ½ sheet of paper that lists the heights of students in a teacher’s class

Write the students’ heights in order from shortest to tallest

Identify the median height and circle it

Norms

Share your expertiseEquity of voiceActive listeningRespect for all perspectivesSelf-monitor use of technologySafety and confidentiality

Connector

On an index card please complete the following sentence stem

“One of the most important learnings that I hope to take away today is…”

Give One, Get One!

Turn to a neighborIntroduce yourself to a colleague

(name & position)Share the information on your cardTurn the other direction and start

the process over againShare out

Outcomes for Today

Understand Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) and their relationship to Median Student Growth Percentiles (MSGPs)

Role of Student Growth Percentiles on goal setting and summative evaluation

ESEA Waiver Requirement

Teachers in tested grades and subjects (Grades 4-8 ELA/Math) and principals must use state assessments as one measure of student learning and growth (SLG) in their evaluation

Oregon educators set two SLG goals annually; Category 1 goals are measured by state assessment; Category 2 goals are measured by other assessments

Teachers in tested grades

and subjects & Principals

Category 1 SLG goal

Category 2 SLG goal

Teachers in non-tested grades and

subjects

Category 2 SLG goal

Category 2 SLG goal

ELA/MathGrades 4-8

ESEA Waiver Update

Oregon’s waiver approved for 3 years with conditions removed

All districts must use Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) to meet the state assessment requirement for SLG goals

For evaluation purposes statewide assessments will only be used as a measure of SLG goal attainment for those grades that have baseline data Tested grades and subjects are now ELA and

Math 4-8

Request to USED for 2015-16

ODE has requested a modification to the waiver Districts required to provide SGP

training to staff SGPs will not be incorporated into

educator summative evaluations for SY 2015-2016

For 2015-16 ODE recommends that all educators set two goals that use Category 2 measures

2016-17 AND BEYOND

Student Growth Percentiles

What is a Student Growth Percentile?

Student Growth Percentiles (SGPs) measure growth for individual students by comparing the improvement in an individual student’s achievement on Smarter Balanced to that of his or her “academic peers” (i.e. those who have similar historical assessment results).

What is a Median Student Growth Percentile?

Median Student Growth Percentile (MSGP) represents the exact middle of the Student Growth Percentile scores for an educator’s students. In other words, half of the educator’s students performed above the median score and half of the students performed below.

Impact of Attendance

Districts must use the state’s definition of “full academic year” when including students on rosters“…consecutive enrollment in a school or district for more than one-half of the instructional days prior to the first school day in May”

Impact of Class Size on SGPs

Districts are required to use Median Student Growth Percentiles for educators who have at least 20 students

Teachers and principals in grades 4-8 (ELA and math only) who fall below 20 students must use other measures that are valid, reliable, and comparable across the school or district (Category 2 measures)

Eventually student SGPs will be pooled across years to create rosters and MSGPs for all educators

Student Growth Percentiles

(SGPs)

Normative growth measure

One year of growth

Growth is relative to students with a similar score history

What do we mean by normative growth?

35%

65%

Percentiles

35th

3rd Grade

2262

Level 1

4th Grade

2398

Level 2

Anthony

2398- 2262

136 points

Anthony’s Comparison Group

21

All 3rd grade test takers in Oregon

Anthony

…with Anthony’s Prior Score ~2262

Level 1

Level 2 Level 3

Level 4

Level 1

Level 2 Level 3

Level 4

Anthony’s Comparison Group

High score

Middle score

4th Grade Score Distribution

Anthony’s prior score ~2262

Level 1

Level 2 Level 3

Level 4

Anthony’s Comparison Group

4th Grade Score Distribution

80% of students in Anthony’s comparison group scored below him 2398

Level 1

Level 2 Level 3

Level 4SGP = 80

Anthony’s Comparison Group

4th Grade Score Distribution

Median Student Growth Percentiles

Students in Mr. Waters’ class

Student SGPSheryl 3Hector 22Robert 36Miranda 38Tre 51Anna 54Eric 71Anthony 80Amina 93

Making a Determination of Student Growth

Category 1 SLG Rating

1 2 3 4

Median SGP Criteria

1 to 34percentil

e

35 to 49percentile

50 to 64percentile

65 to 99percentile

Interpretation

Low growth

Below average growth

Above average growth

High growth

The Median Student Growth Percentile (SGP) determines the educator’s Category 1 SLG Rating

X-Axis = SLG Rating

• SLG performance level based on two goals

• Two-year cycle select two of four goals

• Score SLG goals• Get a rating between 1 and 4;• Use X-Axis thresholds to

determine SLG level: 4 = both goals 4s 3 = both goals 3s; one goal 3 &

one goal 4; one goal 2 & one 4

2 = both goals 2s; one goal 2 & one 3; one goal 1 & one 3; one goal 4 & one 1

1= both goals 1s; one goal 1 & one 2

Mr. WatersMSGP was rated 3Second SLG was

rated 3

X-Axis Rating = Level 3 SLG Rating

Y-Axis = PP/PR Rating Add up all component scores

for total points possible; Divide by number of

components in your rubric; Get a rating between 1 and 4; Use Y-Axis threshold to

determine PP/PR level: 3.6 - 4.0 = 4 2.81-3.59 =3 1.99 – 2.8 = 2 * < 1.99 = 1

*PP/PR Scoring Rule: If the educator scores two 1’s in any PP/PR component and his/her average score falls between 1.99-2.499, the educator’s performance level cannot be rated above a 1.

Mr. Waters District rubric with 20

components Component ratings:

17 components were rated 3; and 3 were rated 2 = 57 points possible

57/20=2.85

2.85 = Level 3 PP/PR Rating

*Inquiry Process

Mr. Waters: Y-axis = 3 & X-axis = 3

Y-A

xis:

PP

/ P

R

LEVEL 4

Collegial

*SLG Inquiry

3

Facilitative or

Collegial

* SLG Inquiry

3 or 4

Facilitative

4

Facilitative

4

LEVEL 3

Collegial or Consulting

*SLG Inquiry

2 or 3

Collegial

3

Collegial

3

Collegial

3

LEVEL 2

Consulting

2

Consulting

2

Consulting

2

Collegial or Consulting

* PP/PR Inquiry

2 or 3

LEVEL 1

Directed

1

Directed

1

Consulting or

Directed

* PP/PR Inquiry

1 or 2

Consulting

* PP/PR Inquiry

2

LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

X-Axis: SLG

Your Turn!

Use the data packet provided to answer these questions: What is Mr. Hendricks’ Y-axis rating? What is Mr. Hendricks’ MSGP?

Use the “State Median Student Growth Percentile Criteria” (p.5 of SGP Guidance, Table 3)

What is Mr. Hendricks’ X-axis rating?

Share Out

Connecting SGPs and SLGs

SLG Requirements for 2015-16

REQUIRED8 components including

Rationale

Minimum of 2 SLG goals each year

Statewide assessments (Category 1) required for teachers and principals in tested grades and subjects

Oregon Matrix used for summative evaluation

RECOMMENDEDContent is focused, not

everything you teach

Context can help ascertain instructional needs

Tier goals/targets where appropriate

Include the support YOU need

How do SGPs change the goal setting and scoring processes?

Teachers and principals in grades 4- 8 in ELA and math

All other educators

Teachers and Principals in Grades 4 – 8 ELA and Math

FALL Set one SLG goal

Quality Review Checklist used for goal setting Goal can use either Category 1 or Category 2

measures Using fall roster data, select either ELA or Math

for MSGP At goal setting conference discuss supports and

strategies needed to help students achieve on Smarter Balanced as well as written goal

WINTERMid-year conference to discuss progress,

revise strategies and supports

Teachers and Principals in Grades 4 – 8 ELA and Math

SPRINGVerify class rosterScore SLG goal

Goal scored using the statewide SLG Scoring Rubric

FALLReceive MSGP rating Use Oregon Matrix used to identify

summative score

All Other Educators

FALL Set two SLG goals

Quality Review Checklist used for goal setting Goals can use either Category 1 (statewide

assessments) or Category 2 (school or district-wide assessments) measures

WINTERMid-year conference to discuss progress,

revise strategies and supports for goals

All Other Educators

SPRINGScore SLG goals

Category 2 goals scored using the statewide SLG Scoring Rubric

Use Oregon Matrix used to identify summative score

Special Education/ Interventionists

SGPs only apply to teachers who are the primary providers of instruction

Only the SGPs of students who take the statewide assessment (Smarter) in ELA or math are used in identifying an educator’s MSGP

Teachers for whom the majority of students take the Extended Assessment (EA) write a goal using the EA as the measure and score it using the statewide rubric

Things to Keep in Mind…

Teachers on a two year cycle MAY select two of the four goals from the cycle

Educators in tested grades and subjects must use one Category 1 goal rating in summative evaluation (Matrix)

Remaining questions?