View
217
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
1/66
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
2/66
ii
Summary
Prompted by the negative environmental impacts of consumption, this study provides an
overview of its antecedents and outcomes. Three primary questions form the basis of this
research. First, temporal changes to the number of coffee and tea beverages being prepared in
the home are investigated. Contextual and individual factors driving reliance on the marketplace
are suggested, along with an overview of the environmental problems caused by high levels of
consumption. Data used to answer these questions are drawn from a phone survey and the
related literature. Methods are identified, in accordance with study findings, for encouraging in-
home beverage preparation because of its social and environmental benefits.
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
3/66
iii
Acknowledgements
Thanks go out to my thesis advisor, Professor Sarah Wolfe, for her constant guidance,
support and editing expertise. My family is also deserving of thanks for their unending support
throughout my years of university. In particular, my mothers help during this thesis project was
invaluable for her suggestions and comments.
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
4/66
iv
Table of Contents
1. Introduction............................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1. Research Questions ............................................................................................................................ 1
1.2. Study Rationale .................................................................................................................................. 2
2. Context ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
2.1. Overview of Market Changes ............................................................................................................ 3
2.2. Overview of Household Changes ...................................................................................................... 4
2.3. Study Boundaries ............................................................................................................................... 6
2.4. Target Audience ................................................................................................................................. 7
2.5. Theoretical Framework ...................................................................................................................... 7
3. Literature Review ...................................................................................................................................... 9
3.1. Sustainable Consumption Definition and Policies............................................................................. 9
3.2. Environmental Impacts of Disposable Beverage Cups.................................................................... 10
3.3. Stakeholder Response to Environmental Impacts............................................................................ 13
3.4. Environmental Impacts of and Motivations for Household Consumption...................................... 14
3.5. Interpretations of Consumer Motivations ........................................................................................ 16
3.6. Summary of Literature Review ........................................................................................................ 18
4. Methodology ........................................................................................................................................... 18
4.1. Overview of Study Methodology..................................................................................................... 18
4.2. Site Population and Sampling Methods ........................................................................................... 19
4.3. Tools of Data Collection and Data Analysis.................................................................................... 20
4.4. Data Validity and Reliability ........................................................................................................... 21
4.5.Study Limitations .............................................................................................................................. 22
5. Results and Discussion ........................................................................................................................... 23
5.1. Profile of Respondents and Survey Results ..................................................................................... 24
5.2. Results on Factors Motivating Consumption................................................................................... 27
5.3. Potential Solutions for Influencing Consumption............................................................................ 30
6. Conclusions and Recommendations........................................................................................................ 34
7. References ............................................................................................................................................... 38
8. Appendices .............................................................................................................................................. 51
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
5/66
1
1. Introduction
1.1. Research Questions
Consumption, a social and economic activity, is having biophysical impacts which are of
increasing concern to North American society (Stern 1997; Jackson 1999). In particular, quick-
service restaurants (QSRs) are generating significant volumes of solid waste from disposable
beverage containers (Reiter 1991). This research asks: 1) compared to 50 years ago, are fewer
people in the Doon Pioneer Park Census Tract (DPPCT) of Kitchener, Ontario, preparing hot
beverages in their households?; 2) what motivates individuals to purchase disposable beverage
cups?; and 3) how can disposable cup usage be reduced to alleviate associated environmental
impacts? Household beverage preparation is regarded as being the environmentally-preferable
option because it provides informed individuals with the opportunity to reduce their personal
environmental impacts.
In-home beverage preparation is regarded as the permanent solution to this problem, but
is challenged by contextual barriers and internal consumer motivations. Once consumers
become aware of the social, physical and mental benefits of cooking at home, they may be less
inclined to purchase problematic convenience products (Allen, et al. 2004). For example,
cooking in the home can provide the opportunity for social bonding amongst family members
(Caraher, et al. 1999). Urban sprawl and technology could be preventing in-home preparation
activities by altering household time allocation decisions (Humbert, et al.2009; Razza, et al.
2009). This study will provide an in-depth discussion on how and why these two contextual
issues may be affecting beverage purchase. Theory indicates that purchase decisions are also
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
6/66
2
influenced by the individuals cognitive, emotive and social motivations. Consequently, each
factor is evaluated here in relation to contextual influences.
Suburban residents who purchase Tim Hortons coffee and tea beverages are the
particular focus of this study. People living in the suburbs often have lengthy commute times
between home and work which reduce time available for other activities (Scheer and Petkov
1998). Tim Hortons, which provides fast and convenient service to commuters, has benefitted
from this situation (Rousell 2006; Canada Newswire 2010); in 2006, the franchise operated
2,613 retail stores in Canada (Wilson 2006: 92). Multiple stakeholder groups have thus far been
unsuccessful at limiting waste generation from Tim Hortons outlets through large-scale
technical, manufacturing and recycling innovations (Ziada 2009). Individual consumers
therefore play an important role in this issue because they can make positive lifestyle choices and
pressure government and industry for change (Schaefer and Crane 2005). This research proposes
various education and training methods based on ideological movements (e.g. Slow Food) to
increase the frequency of in-home beverage preparation.
1.2. Study Rationale
Disposable beverage containers symbolize how convenience products, along with their
associated environmental impacts, have become a central aspect of North American society
(Zylstra 1999; Alsop, et al. 2004; Boccalettie 2008). Despite the growing relevance of this issue,
Garriguet (2008) points out that few academic studies have been published on beverage
consumption and the environment. Multiple studies exist on the environmental impacts of large
household appliances, the globalization of food products and the industrial production of
beverages (Roberts 2002; Hensher, et al. 2005; Chaudhuri and Majumdar 2006; Bell and
Hollows 2007; Bidhendi, et al.2008; Ferrara 2008a; Kristrom 2008; Serret and Ferrara 2008;
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
7/66
3
Vera and Young 2009; Maas 2010). This literature gap is partially addressed by this study on the
factors motivating consumers to purchase QSR beverages. Household and market changes over
time have contributed to the formation and relevance of this issue (Caraher, et al.2004).
2. Context
2.1. Overview of Market Changes
Societal changes have affected Canadian consumption levels and restaurant growth over
the past 50 years. Canadians preference for coffee has remained the same over this time period,
but restaurants have captured a growing portion of this demand. In 2010, it was found that 63
percent of Canadians consumed coffee on a daily basis (Coffee Association of Canada [CAC]
2010:1-2). During the breakfast hour, 16 percent of coffee consumption occurred at eating
places and 12 percent occurred at workplaces (CAC 2010: 15-16). These figures were found to
be similar to consumption statistics from the 1960s (Gilbert, et al. 1976; Duffey and Popkin
2007). A study conducted by Serecon Management Consulting Inc. (2005) for Agri-Food
Canada found that both beverages are expected to remain in high demand, with tea consumption
increasing 40 percent by 2020 (66). However, household spending on QSR beverages has been
increasing concurrently with growing Canadian wealth (Bumstead 1998; Binkley 2006; Minister
of Industry 2008).
Restaurants in Canada have had a long history of strong economic growth. Bulk
production methods developed in the 1960s and 1970s lowered costs and contributed to their
rapid expansion (Emerson 1990). In 1988, 39 percent of each food dollar in Canada was being
spent on food away from home (Reiter 1991: 15). Between 1989 and 1998, spending on QSRs
continued to grow steadily to 42.2 percent of each food dollar (Bennett and Little 1999: 20).
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
8/66
4
This growth stalled in 2004 and analysts at Statistics Canada (2004) have predicted a decline in
the establishment of new restaurants due to rising costs and a saturated market (Kara, et al.
1995). Future QSR expansion will also be affected by changing consumer preferences
(Cynamon and Fazzari 2008). As will be discussed in a subsequent chapter, the uncertain future
of this industry is reflected in the research conclusions of this study.
2.2. Overview of Household Changes
The interactive effects of technology and urban sprawl have altered household time
allocation decisions away from in-home production. This shift is interacting negatively with
womens expected household role as the primary producers of food and beverage items (Lee
2009; Cohen 2010; Morais, et al.2010; York 2010). Women have traditionally been expected to
express their familial love through household food preparation. Accordingly, a growing number
of working women feel frustrated and anxious when unable to organize healthy family meals
(Carrigan, et al. 2006). Advances in labour-saving technologies have allowed women to spend
more time on work and leisure pursuits; however, they are still pressured to fulfill certain
household needs (Lang, et al. 1999; Demory-Luce 2005; Popkin, et al. 2005; Binkley 2006;
Carrigan, et al. 2006; Bell and Hollows 2007; Jabs, et al. 2007; Tashiro 2009; Popkin 2010).
Convenience meals have therefore become an important household staple when time is scarce
(Uusitalo 1982; Caraher, et al. 1999).
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
9/66
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
10/66
6
Urban sprawl could contribute significantly to feelings of time stress in the Canadian
population and increase the desirability of quick, convenient QSR hot beverages (Sarzynski, et
al. 2006; Bloom 2010). Time stress, which is the feeling of not having enough time to complete
all required tasks in a single day, can be influenced by congestion as well as the significant
distance between work, housing and leisure activities in sprawling cities (Jabs, et al. 2007;
Beshara, et al. 2010). Causes and solutions for congestion in cities is a hotly debated topic in the
literature and does not always stimulate demand for alternative forms of public transportation,
such as bus service (Hanssen, et al.2007; Dargay 2008). Many North American cities are
afflicted with this problem because of public resistance towards the perceived difficulties and
costs associated with changing urban forms (Hanssen, et al.2007).
The issue of urban sprawl is of particular salience in the DPPCT of Kitchener, Ontario,
where residents have easy access to the Highway 401 (Swayze 2010). The census of Kitchener
in 2006 found that commuters travelled from Waterloo Region to Guelph (10,130 people),
Mississauga (3,490 people) and Toronto (2,830 people), respectively (Planning, housing and
community services [PHCS] 2006; 2). Additionally, the census indicated most people drive to
work alone, and that their length of commute increased from 5.6 kilometres in 2001 to 5.8
kilometres in 2006 (PHCS 2006; 4). Consequently, this study site was used as a research
boundary.
2.3. Study Boundaries
Three types of boundaries were used to increase the tractability of this research. First, a
spatial boundary delineated the DPPCT in Kitchener as the study site of interest. As lifestyle
preferences, purchases and behaviours tend to vary with age, the socio-economic diversity of this
area was regarded as desirable by the researcher. The Conestoga College Doon Campus and
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
11/66
7
multiple retirement communities were thought to contribute to this diversity. Second, the study
was temporally limited to a 50-year reference period in which North American society
experienced multiple demographic and consumption-related changes (Bumsted 1998). Lastly,
the study focused on hot beverages because they cannot be produced in a separate facility and
shipped directly to the consumer. This shifts the act of consumption from the industrial arena
into the choices of the individual consumer. Consequently, this study empowers consumers to
take action on their personal environmental impacts.
2.4. Target Audience
Researchers and the general public are the two primary audiences of this research. Food
and beverage industry stakeholders are not addressed in this discussion because copious research
already exists on their activities (Hanssen, et al. 2007; Darlington, et al. 2009; Beverage Industry
2010; Calderon, et al. 2010). It is also unlikely that large-scale changes in the industry will
occur without significant pressure from paying customers (Schaefer and Crane 2005).
Consequently, this article hopes to find methods for appealing to the general public. Researchers
are targeted because of their previous success at altering beverage industry practices; for
example, they successfully reduced the packaging volumes required for pre-packaged beverage
products (Saint-Pierre 1998; Rouan 2010). By highlighting the various disadvantages associated
with disposable beverage containers, this study hopes that researchers will invest more effort in
this issue and encourage the public to alter their lifestyles in environmentally positive ways.
2.5. Theoretical Framework
Four theories explaining household and individual consumption levels were evaluated for
their efficacy in this research. This study bases its evaluation of household consumption
behaviours on the characteristics of individuals living in the household and critically evaluates
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
12/66
8
how household purchases could be divided into needs and luxuries. In combination, the four
theories used continued to the survey design and data gathering efforts of this research, although
individually they each possessed various strengths and weaknesses. The two theories used to
understand household consumption levels included the Household Life Cycle (HLC) and
Household Equilibrium Model (HEM).
In the HLC, the number and gender of household heads are considered for their degree of
influence over household purchase decisions (Putler,et al. 2007). Also important to the HLC is
the degree to which the presence or absence of children alters family spending patterns (Putler, et
al. 2007). Although the theory has the potential to indicate very generally the health, activity,
and eating preferences of individuals based on family structure, it is limited by its focus on only
socio-demographic factors (Caraher, et al.1998; Caraher, et al. 1999). Another weakness of this
theory is its inability to distinguish between necessary and luxury spending habits.
Consequently, the HLC needs to be combined with the HEM to fully understand
household consumption patterns. The HEM suggests that households use certain activities and
inputs to fulfill their dynamic and evolving desires (Nelson and Consoli 2010). Needs are met
through the purchase of items to increase or maintain quality of living; however, these needs
change over time based on family member characteristics and preferences (Chen and Kwang-
Wen 1982). For example, older households spend a higher proportion of their money on food,
while clothing and shelter spending is higher in younger households (Chen and Kwang-Wen
1982). Past a basic level of need, however, households cannot discern between required and
luxury items (Nelson and Consoli 2010). This disrupts the equilibrium between necessary and
excessive spending habits and negatively impacts the sustainability of household and individual
consumption levels (Chaudhuri and Majumdar 2006).
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
13/66
9
Individual consumption levels were here evaluated based on two different theories: 1) the
Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB), and 2) the Cue-Based Decision Model (CBDM). TPB
states that purchase behaviours occur in response to an individuals attitudes towards the
behaviour, their perceived degree of control over the behaviour, and subjective interpretations of
the activity (Conner 1993; Abrahamse and Steg 2009: Lee, et al.2009). Product and household
characteristics affecting purchase decisions are not considered in this theory. The CBDM is a
necessary addition to this theory because it states that consumption decisions do not always
occur in a linear, rational progression from discovery to purchase (Hamlin 2010). Instead,
purchase decisions are often based on a single, spontaneous, and largely emotional evaluation of
product cues (Hamlin 2010).
3. Literature Review
To provide a context for this research study, a thorough literature review was conducted.
The following section provides definitions of and problems with sustainable consumption, waste
reduction studies, household consumption motivations, and factors driving individual consumers.
It concludes with a brief summary of the presented information.
3.1. Sustainable Consumption Definition and Policies
Sustainable consumption is of increasing concern for both national and international
agendas; however, policies related to altering society in accordance with this broad term have
thus far proved unsuccessful (OECD 2002). Sustainability can be defined as the maintenance of
biodiversity and human health over time (Rimmington,et al. 2006; Bakker and Kooy 2008;
Theodore 2008; Stahls, et al. 2010). Consumption describes household purchase and use of
material possessions to increase personal satisfaction and social position (Hume 2010).
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
14/66
10
Sustainable consumption therefore occurs when households purchase certain goods in quantities
which do not harm environmental resources for current or future generations (Stern 1997).
Policies aimed at moderating consumption levels have thus far proven to be unsuccessful.
The OECD (2002) Environment Directorate has actively worked on sustainable consumption
since 1994, but has only recently determined the need for multi-stakeholder involvement in
altering the structure of consumption and production levels. Critical stakeholders, including non-
governmental organizations, consumers, private businesses, and public agencies, must determine
feasible methods for reducing waste at the source (OECD 2002). The basis for these new, future
policies must be consumer perspectives and motivations.
3.2. Environmental Impacts of Disposable Beverage Cups
Multiple researchers have noted the ongoing impact of disposable beverage containers
and are trying to evaluate their impacts through Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) studies (Nicholls and
Nystuen 1993; Sonesson, et al.2005; Garrido and Del Castillo 2007; Theodore 2008; Darlington,
et al.2009; Humbert, et al.2009; Razza, et al. 2009; Calderon, et al.2010; Hu, et al. 2010; Xue
and Landis 2010). Disposable cups from QSRs were initially considered to be an important
sanitary innovation in the business world, but are increasingly targeted as a source of
environmental problems (Dineen 2009). LCA studies discussed in this section are problematic
because they present contradictory information which fails to identify long-term solutions for
reducing overall use levels of disposable beverage cups.
The life stages examined in an LCA include extraction, production, transportation, use,
and disposal; the process of calculating impacts in each area highlights where improvements are
needed (Ceridon 2010; Rouan 2010).Table 1, below, summarizes the components evaluated in an
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
15/66
11
LCA for a disposable cup as discussed in several research studies. It should be noted that the
highest resource use intensity occurred during the second and fourth phases (Tukker, et al.2005;
Marcotte,et al. 2006; Hanssen,et al.2007).
Table 1: Product Life Cycle Stages with description of Stage Characteristics, Inputs, and Outputs
Broad Stages ofProduct Life Cycle
Stage Characteristics Inputs Outputs
1: Extraction -Select forest resources-Extract resources usingharvesting technology-Transport resources toproduction facility
-Forestresources-Energy
-Solid waste produced duringextraction activities-Airborne emissions fromtransportation
2: Production and
Transportation
-Process and manufacture
product-Package product fortransport-Transport product todistributor
-Forest
resources-Water-Energy
-Primary and secondary products
-Water effluents frommanufacturing-Solid waste as manufacturing by-products-Chemical emissions for pulping(e.g. sodium hydroxide)-Airborne emissions fromtransportation
3: Use -Customer use phase -Forestresources
-Water
-Energy
-Solid waste from packaging-Airborne emissions from energyusage
4: Disposal -Disposal phase-Waste and recyclingmanagement
-Forestresources
-Water-Energy
-Solid waste from product disposal-Water effluents from disposalfacility-Airborne emissions producedduring product transport to disposalfacility-Airborne emissions producedduring break down of the product
Sources: Ceridon (2010); Hocking (1991, 1994); Vercalsteren, et al. 2010
Garrido and Del Castillo (2007) and Hocking (1994) present contradictory information
on the trip rate of reusable containers. The trip rate is the number of times that the beverage
container must be used to make up for the resources and energy embedded in its production
(Vercalsteren, et al. 2010). Garrido and Del Castillo (2007) determined that a reusable cup must
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
16/66
12
be used 10 times before it gains superiority over the disposable cup as an environmentally-
preferable option (Garrido and Del Castillo 2007: 252). In contrast, Hocking (1994) argues
against the use of reusable containers because of their high trip rate, estimated at anywhere from
15 to 1,000 uses (894). The study by Hocking (1994) is outdated and therefore overestimates
required usages because of low dishwasher efficiency. However, the strongly technical nature of
both LCA studies causes them to ignore the underlying reasons driving demand for both reusable
and disposable cups. The articles fail to note that reusable beverage containers, if poorly
designed, could become an even greater waste problem if planned for obsolescence. Their
conclusions do not indicate long-term solutions because they both fail to address innovations
occurring in the beverage production industry (Sonesson, et al. 2005; Darlington,et al. 2009).
Hocking (1991) and Humbert, et al. (2009) use LCAs to evaluate the impacts of
disposable beverage container waste, but again propose few long-term solutions. Hocking
(1991) notes that the thin polystyrene liner added to paper cups to make them more durable and
heat-resistant also prevents them from being recycled. He fails to note that beverage containers
labelled as biodegradable do not always decompose in the landfill if moisture and temperature
conditions are not ideal (Theodore 2008; Darlington, et al.2009; Vercalsteren, et al. 2010).
Humbert, et al. (2009) suggests that efficiency, or minimized input for maximum output, could
reduce the problems associated with disposable beverage container waste in QSRs (Razza, et al.
2009). However, he fails to note that efficiency is challenged in practice by staff error and
customer dissatisfaction. The nature of this problem is difficult to solve, as staff turnover is high
and it is time-consuming to regulate all new employees for efficiency. This suggests that
disposable beverage container waste will continue to be an issue despite product innovations.
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
17/66
13
3.3. Stakeholder Response to Environmental Impacts
According to the environmental risk theory proposed by Beck (1992), negative
externalities from the marketplace threaten all consumers indiscriminately; however, Canadian
residents, companies, and government stakeholders are currently not taking sufficient action on
the impacts caused by disposable beverage containers. The materialistic and busy lifestyles of
the current generation of youth have been identified as the reason for their immobility on
environmental protection issues (Omann, et al. n.d.; Ouellette n.d.; The Globe and Mail 1990;
Duecy 2006; Statistics Canada 2009; Adams and Raisborough 2010). Public concern regarding
the environmental impacts of disposable beverage containers is higher in the United States, and
residents have pushed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2002) to undertake multiple
programs for environmental protection. This is due to residents awareness that these cups are
not recyclable and use old-growth forests in their production (Dogwood Alliance 2008;
Erickson-Davis 2008). In Canada, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been the primary
control on the impacts of disposable beverage containers.
Under the concept of CSR, QSRs are attempting to reduce disposable beverage container
waste. CSR policies were first defined in the 1970s as being exclusively economic; today, these
policies protect environmental, economic, and socio-cultural protection simultaneously
(Silberhorn and Warren 2007; Laing and Frost 2010). Tim Hortons has been less successful at
this than Starbucks, another QSR known for its coffee beverages. This is because Tim Hortons
has not devoted sufficient time and money towards making its coffee cup more sustainable (Tim
Hortons n.d.; Demirbas 2010). Starbucks created an Alliance Task Force to conduct in-store
studies on disposable container usage (Alliance for Environmental Innovation [AEI] 2000).
They proposed installing reusable mugs with a chip that would act like a debit card and
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
18/66
14
encourage customers to remember their mugs (AEI 2000). Starbucks began this initiative to
reduce company costs for disposable containers, but it would ultimately benefit all stakeholders.
The government of the City of Toronto only recently began to take action on the
problems with disposable beverage containers. Urban areas like Toronto struggle with shrinking
availability of landfill space for these cups (Jackson 1999; Welsh 2008). The City of Toronto
created a Hot Drink Task Force (HDTF) in response to this problem, and they determined that
1 million cups were purchased each day in Toronto in 2009 (Kelleher Environmental [KE] 2009:
4). To determine potential solutions, they evaluated other municipalities which have been
attempting to recycle disposable beverage containers (e.g. Owen Sound) (KE 2009). However,
recycling is only feasible for polyethylene terephthalate (PET) containers because they have a
high concentration of post-consumer waste and are increasing in production volumes
(Georgakellos 2006; Penn 2007; Amcor 2010; Rouan 2010). The Task Force therefore proposed
banning disposable cups, a disposable cup tax, or a deposit-return program (KE 2009). In
response to these potential changes, Tim Hortons instituted recycling systems at its store
locations; however, once off the property, customers are no longer able to access these facilities
(KE 2009). This shows how there is should be a shift towards in-home production, where the
informed consumer can control their personal environmental impacts.
3.4. Environmental Impacts of and Motivations for Household Consumption
Researchers have identified how household behaviour is critical to minimizing the
environmental impacts of beverage consumption, although there should be less of a focus on
technological solutions. Behaviours which can increase impacts from beverage preparation
include inefficient dishwashing techniques, boiling excess water unnecessarily, or leaving the
coffee machine switched on (Hanssen,et al.2007; Humbert, et al.2009). Technology is
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
19/66
15
perceived as the most expedient way to alter these behaviours because it controls cumulative
consumer impacts (Soron 2010). However, technology was identified by Sen (1983) as the
basis for many of [societys] mistakes (76). Accordingly, solutions proposed in this study are
based on the perspectives of consumers and encourage the use of the precautionary principle to
encourage residents to make small, proactive, and beneficial changes to their lifestyles.
Past research studies have identified a wide variety of household characteristics which
affect their motivations for purchase from QSRs. The quantitative characteristics discussed in
Table 2 are supported by extensive data; however, the following section discusses intangible
factors which are also influential in human decisions (Leibenstein 1950; Husic and Cicic 2009).
Table 2: Household factors contributing to or constraining QSR patronage
Controlling Factor Description LiteratureReference(s)
HouseholdComposition - Young, single person households are more
likely to patronize QSR- Single women with children are less likely to
patronize QSR- Women with families working outside the
home are more likely to patronize QSR
Little and Beland1998; Bennettand Little 1999;
Meyers andWallace 2003;Binkley 2006;Fanning, Marshand Stiegert2010
Household Income- Household income affects the type and
amount of QSR spending, although itscorrelation to patronage frequency is lessclear
- Longer hours spent working at a job increased
QSR patronage (due to time constraints)
Bennett and Little1999; Demory-Luce 2005;Binkley 2006
Household Attitudes- Health-conscious individuals are less likely to
patronize QSRs- Socio-demographic variables are unrelated to
QSR patronage when households place ahigher priority on activities outside the home
Bennett and Little1999; Demory-Luce 2005; SMCI2005; Binkley2006; Tashiro2009; Moser
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
20/66
16
2010
Household Location- Households in British Columbia, Quebec, and
Alberta are more likely to patronize QSR- Urban households more likely to patronize
QSR (due to the high density of QSR in urbanareas)
Reiter 1991;Bennett and Little1999; Tashiro
2009; Fanning, etal.2010; Moser2010
3.5. Interpretations of Consumer Motivations
Within an interpretive framework, consumers are understood to have multiple views and
internal motivations affecting purchase decisions. These interpretive views do not have a clearly
stated value for sustainable consumption levels, and the focus is on the multiple and interacting
perspectives of involved stakeholders (Schaefer and Crane 2005). Stakeholder groups have
similar goals and language habits; these diverse sets of people have consequently formed
differing ideas about consumption (Schaefer and Dervin 2009; Irwin and Hramiak 2010).
The multiplicity of consumer views suggests that there is no single method for
encouraging them towards more sustainable behaviours. Consumers can be understood as
rational beings or entities responding to the dictates of cultural pressures (Schaefer and Crane
2005). The former suggests that individual act according to individual utility, while the latter
indicates cultural expectations as a major motivating force (Schaefer and Crane 2005).
Advertising has taken advantage of this situation by targeting people based on these motivating
forces (Humphreys 2010; Irwin and Hramiak 2010; Medley-Rath and Simonds 2010).
Consumers who purchase items for personal pleasure, social advancement, or self-identity may
struggle to understand the utility of altering their consumption behaviours for environmental
benefits (Schaefer and Crane 2005; Cherrier 2009; Irwin and Hramiak 2010).Consequently, there
is no single way to reach an individual and change their personal consumption habits.
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
21/66
17
Emotional ties and social groups are two internal motivating factors which generate
feelings of customer satisfaction and therefore influence purchase decisions (Espejel, et al. 2008;
Nelson and Consoli 2010; Ute, et al. 2010). Emotional ties to a product can be created by
sensory perceptions, such as taste and smell, which activate consumer memories of past
experiences (Honkanen and Frewer 2009; Shukla 2010). Products also possess symbolic
properties which can appeal to an individuals emotions; however, product values vary
worldwide due to cultural differences (Lee and Ulgado 1997; Chaudhuri and Majumdar 2006;
Kniazeva and Venkatesh 2007). These differences, which alter global consumption patterns, can
be evaluated through the communicative model (Lee 2009; Soron 2010). Although this model
ignores the broader societal context, it aids in an identification of cultural signifiers and identity
markers associated with individual products (Soron 2010). To gain a complete picture of
internal motivations, social interaction in product purchase must also be considered.
Social interaction in product purchase is based on the activities of reference groups.
Reference groups are defined social groups against which the consumer compares their personal
activities (Cynamon and Fazzari 2008). Multiple researchers have found that customers are
more likely to rely on these intangible product benefits over prices during decision-making
processes (Johns and Pine 2002; Iop, et al. 2006; Barrena and Sanchez 2010; Milijkovic and
Effertz, 2010). This is due to the perceived importance of adhering to group preferences and
gaining social status (Veblen 1965; Bevan 2010; Martinon-Torres 2010; Pinheiro-Machado
2010). Market segmentation is a well-known theory based on reference groups, because it
involves dividing the population and targeting specific groups with personalized promotion
efforts (Iop, et al. 2006; Chen-Wen and Chi-Shun 2009; Lin and Chienwen 2009). Households
can also be categorized into different groupings.
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
22/66
18
3.6. Summary of Literature Review
The preceding section provided an overview of sustainable consumption, environmental
impacts and associated responses, and motivations for the purchase of disposable beverage
containers. This information is important because it helps answer the second and third questions
of this research. Sustainable consumption, in which excessive purchase of goods is moderated,
is necessary because of the negative environmental impacts from disposable beverage cups.
Many existing LCAs provide a general rationale for reducing disposable cup usage, but provide
few solutions to this problem. Responses to disposable cup waste from Canadian residents,
businesses, and government stakeholders have also not identified potential solutions.
In this study, household production is emphasized as a solution because of the potential
for knowledgeable residents to control their own environmental impacts. Household
characteristics typically determine their QSR patronage. However, consumer behaviours could
be altered by utilizing the internal purchase motivations of emotional ties and social reference
groups within the existing views of consumption. This information assisted in the design of the
survey conducted on residents of the DPPCT. More specific solutions for reducing market
consumption will be discussed in Section 5.4.
4. Methodology
4.1. Overview of Study Methodology
This research was based on qualitative methodology, although the survey provided
quantitative data. A strong focus on words rather than numbers in qualitative methodology
requires that the researcher remain aware of their own perspective during the research process, as
this bias could alter their eventual conclusions (Sayer1997). This research project was strongly
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
23/66
19
focused on understanding how social actors create their own subjective meanings towards their
daily consumptive activities (Vollmer 2005; Kay 2008; Bryman, et al. 2009). Consequently, the
research includes a broad range of secondary research sources to identify individual and societal
perspectives relevant to the study questions.
Secondary research was taken from a variety of online sources. Boolean searches in
scholarly databases such as Scholars Portal and ProQuest were combined with Google and
Yahoo! search engines to yield peer-reviewed journal articles, government documents,
newspaper articles, and other official documents (Bryman, et al. 2009). Secondary information
from these sources can be problematic because of its complexity and the fact that the researcher
has no control over data quality (Hanssen,et al.2007; Bryman, et al. 2009). These problems
were addressed via a background check on the source as well as a critical reading of its contents.
4.2. Site Population and Sampling Methods
Primary research was drawn from a survey conducted in the Doon Pioneer Park Census
Tract (DPPCT) in Kitchener, Ontario. Census Tracts (CTs) are small geographic areas typically
located within the larger census metropolitan areas (CMAs) and census agglomerations (CAs)
(Census Tract Profiles 2006). In 2006, the DPPCT had a population of 8,902 individuals, up
55.5 percent from 2001 (Census Tract Profiles 2006). The populations median age in 2006 was
33.2 years, with a median income of $51,531 (Census Tract Profiles 2006). This study site was
selected for two primary reasons: 1) socio-economic diversity of the areas population as shown
through the Census Tract Profile (2006) of their age, gender, and other demographic
characteristics; and, 2) the presence of multiple Tim Hortons franchises in the area.
Additionally, it was thought that many residents from the DPPCT would commute long distances
to and from their workplace because of the close proximity of the Highway 401 to the
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
24/66
20
community. This study was interested in these factors because of the effects that household time
availability and factors discussed in the HLC are assumed to have on QSR patronage.
4.3. Tools of Data Collection and Data Analysis
Primary research for this study consisted of a survey on beverage consumption habits.
The approximately 15-minute survey (Appendix A) was conducted over the phone during
January 2011 with 50 consenting residents. Telephone surveys were used because they provide
an inexpensive and efficient way to gather data (Calvert and Pope 2005). A modified random
sampling technique was used to select a sample of participants from within the larger DPPCT
population (Calvert and Pope 2005). First, the N2P postal code for the southeast portion of the
DPPCA neighbourhood was used to get a list of full, associated postal codes from
www.postalcodedownload.com/; a total of 340 postal codes were gathered from this process and
pasted into the first column of a blank Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. In the second column, each
cell was filled with Excels Random function, =rand(), and both columns were sorted from the
smallest to largest random numbers.
Next, the first 100 postal codes from the list created were selected as potential
participants. Using Canada411.ca, a reverse lookup for households, the researcher looked up
each postal code and selected a single phone number from within the group. Postal codes which
did not have any associated phone numbers were discarded and the next code was used. The
researcher then hand-delivered an ethics form to each selected residence, followed by a phone
call to determine residents interest in participating. Next, the researcher asked consenting
residents each survey question over the phone and recorded each response in Microsoft Excel.
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
25/66
21
Data analysis was conducted through the use of Excel because of the need to maintain
clarity in research interpretations. An alternative statistical program considered was the
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS). SPSS is valuable to researchers because of
its ability to conduct chi-squared tests examining whether a relationship exists between different
variables; however, sufficient insights into the thesis questions were gathered during Excel
analyzes (OConnor 2000). Excel was also of greater familiarity to the researcher, thus ensuring
that results were interpreted correctly.
4.4. Data Validity and Reliability
Survey questions and associated participant responses may have affected the internal and
external validity of research results. External validity implies that results were based on the
correct causal variables, thus allowing conclusions to be generalized across a variety of different
social settings (Bryman, et al. 2009). If, for example, a measurement of coffee consumption was
not accurate, it would be inappropriate to correlate this faulty data to a respondents age and
expect the results to provide an accurate portrayal of the concept. Internally, a study is valid
when it rests on a strong theoretical basis (Bryman, et al. 2009).
Attempts were made to keep survey information internally and externally valid. The
researcher designed the survey with short, specific closed questions to avoid participant
confusion and provide insight into the motivations underlying behaviours (Hedrick, et al. 2010).
Multiple causal variables, including family composition, commitments outside of the home, and
length of commute, were analyzed to build a profile of the respondent that could be connected
back to the HLC model. Quantitative (e.g. how long is your commute?) and qualitative (e.g. do
you often feel so pressured that you do not taste what you are eating or drinking) questions were
used to evaluate the concept of time stress. Results were also analyzed in the context of historical
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
26/66
22
data to provide a clear picture of consumption over time. However, components beyond the
researchers control may affect the reliability of survey results.
Participant responses could alter the reliability of conclusions in this study. Reliability
means that the same results would be achieved consistently if a particular measurement
technique was administered multiple times to the same research subject (Bryman, et al. 2009).
However, social pressure to provide the perceived correct response could alter participant
responses; consequently, results may vary with the same survey administered at different times
(Bryman, et al. 2009). Respondents behaviours may also differ from their stated intentions
(Dargay 2008). To minimize variations in study responses, more fluid research techniques such
as key contact interviews were not used.
4.5. Study Limitations
This study did not attempt to undertake an LCA and was limited by survey distribution
times and incommensurable historical data. First, an LCA was not conducted as a part of this
study because it would have necessitated specialized knowledge and a long time frame. Instead,
existing LCAs were used to provide information on the environmental impacts of disposable hot
beverage containers through an assessment of energy and material inputs required for the product
(Calderon, et al.2010).
Second, the survey was distributed immediately after the Christmas season. It is during
this time that people become financially conservative and tend to avoid spending disposable
income on luxury items, such as QSR coffee and tea (Cynamon and Fazzari 2008). Conducting
the survey during the annual Roll up the Rim to win contest, which encourages purchase by
offering prizes such as bicycles and vehicles, would likely have produced very different results.
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
27/66
23
Lastly, historical data was not available at the scale of this study. Coffee and tea
consumption data was primarily available at the national scale (e.g. Coffee Association of
Canada). This meant that only a general timeline of consumption versus in-home production
levels were presented in chapter 2 of this article. In combination with survey results, this general
information proved adequate for illustrating how, within certain demographic groups, patronage
of quick-service restaurants declined and then increased in response to factors such as market
saturation. All three of the above limitations are considered in the results and discussion section,
which analyzes survey results from the case study area.
5. Results and Discussion
Three primary questions guided the literature and data-gathering efforts of this research
project. General characteristics and theoretical bases of the following questions have been
discussed in the literature review:
1.
How has the quantity of hot beverages prepared in the home versus those consumed at
QSRs shifted over the past 50 years?2. What are the environmental impacts of disposable hot beverage containers, and how can
consumption be altered to reduce these impacts?3. Why are people purchasing disposable hot beverage containers from QSRs in Canada,
and how can consumption levels be altered for environmental benefits?
The remainder of this chapter will use survey results from the DPPCA to answer these
questions. Several of the survey questions were less relevant than initially thought and yielded a
limited amount of useful data. For example, Question 9 asked respondents what items were
present in their household kitchen (Appendix A). The purpose of this question was to determine
whether or not respondents frequently prepared items in their household, as measured through
the presence of various appliances. This question provided little insight because all items were
generally present in each participating household; consequently, well-established literature
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
28/66
24
findings were carefully considered in comparison to survey findings and are presented in the
following discussion.
5.1. Profile of Respondents and Survey Results
A profile of households, based on survey responses and the HLC, was created to analyze
variables of interest to this study. Coffee and tea consumption levels were as expected, although
respondents purchasing habits, time stress, and commuting activities were contrary to the
literature. First, the household profile indicates that the typical household in the study area is
headed by two parents with financially-dependent children. Individuals aged 31 to 40 years of
age were the largest age category at 20 percent of all respondents (Appendix B). Three-resident
households made up 36 percent of respondents, and 64 percent were married with children
(Appendix C and D). The HLC indicates that household needs in this situation tend to vary
greatly; however, survey results indicate that in-home production was the typical method for
fulfilling these needs (Nelson and Consoli 2010).
As expected, respondents favoured coffee as their hot beverage of choice. This finding is
supported by the literature (e.g. Gilbert, et al. 1976; Duffey and Popkin 2007). Coffee was
consumed at least once in the past week by 68 percent of respondents. Coffee makers were also
used quite frequently in the home by participating households; they were used more than 6 times
over the past week by 18 percent of respondents, while 3 to 4 usages was the next largest
category at 12 percent (Appendix E). Tea kettles were not used by 48 percent of respondents and
were therefore the slightly less popular drink between the two options (Appendix F). It is
possible that consumption is dropping for both hot beverages because companies are producing
beverages which claim to provide health-conscious consumers with vitamins, minerals, and
antioxidants (Penn 2007). A good example of kind of beverage is the Fuze drink, which claims
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
29/66
25
to provide consumers with healthy methods for achieving energy, relaxation, or stress relief
(Kara, et al.1995; Beverage Industry 2010).
Due to the importance of in-home production in the study site, few respondents
purchased Tim Hortons coffee frequently. A little over half, or 52 percent, of respondents stated
that they had not purchased a hot beverage from Tim Hortons in the week prior to the survey
(Appendix G). Those who did frequent Tim Hortons establishments were regular, but not
necessarily heavy, users. Only 24 percent of respondents had purchased a Tim Hortons hot
beverage 6-10 times in the past week (Appendix G). If this survey had been conducted in two
different locations simultaneously (e.g. a neighbourhood and a university campus), results may
have captured a larger proportion of Tim Hortons patrons. Consequently, this survey is useful
for contradicting existing studies, rather than for what it confirms from the literature.
Despite the high volume of female survey respondents and their degree of time stress, in-
home production levels were still high. The study therefore does not support the earlier
assumption that women are leading household decisions towards greater purchase of disposable,
convenient hot beverage containers because of contextual factors such as technology and urban
sprawl (Emerson 1990; Serret and Ferrara 2008; Vera and Young 2009). A strong majority of
respondents were female at 74 percent of the total survey (Appendix H). Recall the earlier
definition of time stress as being an individuals sense that they do not have enough time in the
day to complete all desired activities (Jabs, et al. 2007). Exactly 50 percent of respondents
agreed that they felt so pressured that they often did not taste what they were eating and
drinking; additionally, 52 percent indicated that they had a full-time, paid position outside of the
home (Appendix I and J). However, 66 percent of respondents agreed that they spend a
significant amount of time each day preparing food and beverage items inside the home
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
30/66
26
(Appendix K). There are several potential explanations for the high degree of in-home
production at the study site.
Respondents personal preferences and time spent in the home could be contributing to
the frequency of in-home production. Meyers and Wallace (2003) indicated that health concerns
surrounding QSR items can increase to the desirability of food and beverage prepared inside the
home. Consequently, it could be that respondents in this study underwent trade-offs in their time
to avoid purchasing QSR items. In-home production levels may also have been increased by the
large number of respondents who do not work outside of the home. There were 48 percent of
respondents who did not work outside of the home; of these, 34 percent felt that they were not
required to be outside of the home for long periods each day (Appendix J and L). The low
number of respondents working outside the home also affected results on commuting.
Despite the proximity of the Highway 401 to the study area, few residents were found to
commute long distances each day. Urban sprawl was identified earlier in this study as a potential
contextual factor contributing to the desirability of QSR disposable beverage containers (Reiter
1991). Results on commuting levels were influenced by the 48 percent of respondents who did
not work outside of the home, and thus did not have a daily commute (Appendix J). For those
who did commute, a one way trip to their place of paid employment took less than 1 hour for 38
percent of travellers, while 12 percent had to travel for about 1 hour (Appendix M). There were
only 22 percent of respondents who felt that they spent too much time each day commuting; this
suggests that urban sprawl is not contributing to feelings of time stress by participants (Appendix
N). The preceding discussion has illustrated how contextual factors, including technology and
urban sprawl, have little influence over beverage purchasing habits in the study site.
Consequently, there is an even greater potential for the consumer to alter their environmental
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
31/66
27
impacts from beverage consumption. However, changes to their purchase behaviour may be
predicated on internal motivations. This issue is discussed in the following section.
5.2. Results on Factors Motivating Consumption
The literature review of this report identified individual perspectives of consumption,
social reference groups, and emotional ties as influential factors in consumption decisions.
These motivations have been used in other studies evaluating behaviour and its antecedents (e.g.
Boccalettie 2008; McDonald, et al. 2009; Soron 2010). This study provides further support
regarding the importance of these internal motivations, as it identified the limited influence that
contextual factors have on influencing peoples decisions. However, the researcher was
challenged to accurately identify which motivation was most influential in purchase decisions
due to the low number of survey respondents who were regular patrons of Tim Hortons. Data
from two survey questions were evaluated in the context of the literature to provide information
on these three variables. Survey results discussed here have implications for both the study site
and the wider community.
Questions 17 and 18 from the survey were used to evaluate respondents internal
motivations for beverage purchase (Appendix A). Question 17 evaluated general QSR
purchases, while Question 18 investigated Tim Hortons specifically; respondents ranked various
factors influencing their decisions on a scale from 1 (Not very Important) to 5 (Extremely
Important). With regards to general QSR beverages,convenience was identified as being the
most influential factor; 14 percent of respondents indicated that it was Very Important in their
purchase decisions. The second most important factor was the value and quality of QSR hot
beverages, at 12 percent of all respondents ranking it as Very Important. It was explained to
respondents that value and quality meant a fair volume of the beverage was provided for its cost.
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
32/66
28
These results suggest that people perceive disposable beverage containers to be convenient and
well-priced. Consequently, their perspectives of consumption could be based on the utility of the
product to their lifestyle, rather than social advancement amongst their peers or personal identity
formation (Schaefer and Crane 2005). Schaefer and Crane (2005) disagree with this finding and
state that societal expectations are the most significant factor to influence purchase decisions.
To deal with this contradiction in results, data on Tim Hortons consumption motivations
were interpreted with caution. This was especially a concern because so few respondents were
regular Tim Hortons patrons. With regards to Tim Hortons beverages, taste and fast service
were identified as the most important factors in purchase decisions. Both factors were rated as
Very Important by 34 percent of respondents. Although the literature indicates that social
reference groups and emotional ties are influential in the formation of a consumers self-image,
54 percent of respondents did not think that they would purchase Tim Hortons hot beverages to
fit in with other social groups (Veblen 1965; Chaudhuri and Majumdar 2006; Cherrier 2009;
Husic and Cicic 2009; McDonald, et al. 2009; Shukla 2010; Soron 2010). It is more likely that
the Tim Hortons brand, when purchased, is regarded as desirable because of its association with
patriotic pride (Ouellette n.d.). The limited importance of social groups and emotional ties to
purchase of Tim Hortons hot beverages suggests that behavioural changes could occur by
providing information to consumers on the personal utility of alternative options. Such efforts
are required for the larger community, but not within the study site.
For the study site, these findings imply that residents are already fully aware of the
benefits of in-home production and regularly engage in this activity. Although this study was
conducted over a short period of time in a spatially restricted region, the popularity of preparing
beverages in the study site supports market research that QSRs are reaching market saturation
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
33/66
29
and becoming a less popular option. This appears to be the case even for time-stressed
individuals, who were thought to be carefully allocating their time each day so that they could
prepare food and beverage items in the home. Question 22 of the survey found that 30 percent of
individuals were not interested in relying on QSRs for their food and beverage items, even when
time stressed (Appendix O). Several respondents noted, informally, that they preferred the taste
of their own cooking, regardless of environmental or health concerns. However, it is thought
that conducting this study in multiple locations and at different times would have lowered in-
home production levels.
As the literature review suggested that the wider community frequently relies on QSRs
for their food and beverage items, this study investigated methods for increasing in-home
beverage preparation. Despite the limited importance of social reference groups for influencing
purchase decisions, social interactioncould be an attractive motivator for increasing in-home
beverage preparation. A strong majority of respondents, at 64 percent of the population, felt that
drinking coffee or tea is something that they might enjoy more with other people around
(Appendix P). The OECD (2002) also supports the needs for social solutions over technical
ones, although social ideas must be supported by firm educational initiatives.
Providing consumers with information and education on legitimate methods for
becoming environmentally responsible can inspire them to behave differently (Soron 2010).
Consumers lack complete knowledge of products environmental impacts; for example,
Starbucks researchers found that consumers thought beverage containers were environmentally-
friendly if they appeared natural in their colour, texture, and composition (AEI 2000). Educating
consumers on the benefits of and methods for preparing beverages in the home could allow them
to take complete control of their environmental impacts and feel environmentally empowered.
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
34/66
30
5.3. Potential Solutions for Influencing Consumption
Although ideas borrowed from the Slow Food movement and Japanese Way of Tea
ceremony could hold promise for altering North American beverage consumption habits, barriers
to making this change are evaluated throughout the following section. Training and education
methods for communicating with the public on this issue are also addressed. These issues are
included in this section because of the need to alter consumers perceptions rather than provide
them with strictly technical or financial incentives for changing their behaviour. Neither
instruments were considered in this study because they do not always internalize environmental
costs, are subject to political acceptability, and generate social equity concerns (OECD 2002).
Slow Food ideology suggests that positive reinforcement of environmentally-friendly
behaviour has the potential to change consumer activities. The Slow Food movement was
founded by Carlo Petrini in the 1970s after a McDonalds threatened local food production in the
small town of Bra, Italy (Bell and Hollows 2007; Andrews 2008; Laing and Frost 2010;
Sassatelli and Davolio 2010). Its focus on taste, bodily pleasure, and social interaction during
food consumption activities has contributed to its widespread acceptance around the world
(Sassatelli and Davolio 2010). This focus also helps connect individuals to each other and the
environment when consuming certain products (Hayes-Conroy 2009). However, several aspects
of the movement are problematic and must be avoided.
The Slow Food movement suffers from cultural ignorance, elitist tendencies, and
unrealistic ideals. After its creation in Italy, the movement spread across the globe by re-
labelling adherents to eco-gastronomists and its gatherings to food communities (Sassatelli
and Davolio 2010). However, it continues to rely on Italy for its image and has failed to develop
appropriate techniques for appealing to individuals in different cultures (Andrews 2008). This
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
35/66
31
study therefore limits its analysis and proposed solutions to the North American context.
Second, the movement has elitist tendencies which posit food producers as passive agents, which
shifts power to upper-class individuals (Andrews 2008). It also ignores the information and
financial barriers associated with purchasing high-quality local food products (Boccalettie 2008).
This study proposes overcoming both issues by providing free workshops on beverage
preparation, a solution which has been used successfully in other contexts (OECD 2002).
Lastly, the movement is predicated on unrealistic ideals. Carlo Petrini stated that there
can be no slow food without slow life, meaning we cannot influence food culture without
changing our culture as a whole (Andrews 2008:39). Due to current economicrealities, it is
idealistic to hope that entire cultures will become slow, utopian communities. Instead, the
movement should be defining more concrete, realistic goals. For example, the movement could
create small enclaves in large malls where customers would be provided with reusable beverages
mugs for in-store drink purchases. This would encourage more social interaction between
customers and reduce the de-socializing impacts of consumption activities.
The Japanese Way of Tea ceremony has similarbenefits and challenges to the Slow
Food movement for creating social and environmental benefits through beverage consumption.
Tea ceremonies can enhance human relationships with each other and the natural world by
promoting the ideals of moderation and mindfulness (Sen 1983; Blofeld 1985). Coffee
production is similarly sacred in Ethiopia, where coffee roasting is done slowly three times to
represent peace, health, and spirit (Rousell 2006). Preparing coffee or tea in the home is even
more beneficial because it can create a strong bond between the host and guest; this genuine
relationship could potentially reduce the consumers need to emulate reference groups or
purchase brands in an attempt to createsocial ties (Chen-Wen and Chi-Shun 2009).
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
36/66
32
Despite the positive and engaging ideals inherent in the Way of Tea, it is specific to a
single culture, intellectually elitist, and based on unrealistic ideals. In China and Japan, the Way
of Tea developed during the 12thcentury as a practice used for advancing spiritual ideals,
community unity, and connections to the natural world (Chen-Wen and Chi-Shun 2009). As this
practice could potentially be rejected by fast-paced North American culture, the ideas distilled
from this movement are thought to be more accessible to North Americans. It is possible that
these ideas, which are intangible and do not provide immediate gratification, may only be
accepted by certain portions of the population. Disseminating information on this topic to the
general public via the internet could overcome this problem because of the high degree of
penetration that this technology has in individual households (DiPietro, et al. 2007). Websites
are valuable modes of communication because they can cheaply distribute large volumes of
information to enhance an individuals decision-making ability (Auger 2005; DiPietro, et al.
2007).Using this technology is acceptable because it merely guides an individuals behaviour
and does not replace or eliminate human effort.
To aid in the guidance of individual behaviours through the ideals of the Slow Food
movement and Japanese Way of Tea ceremony, training and education programs could be used.
Awareness of how to appropriately design and deliver information to the public is growing,
leading to communication programs which link to individual concerns, place consumer decisions
in a wider context, and avoid creating information overload (OECD 2002).Training programs are
important to this study because they reveal how creating cooking competency can reward people
and reinforce compliance with behavioural changes (Caraher, et al. 2004; KE 2009; Abrahamse
and Steg 2009). Children in North America are not learning how to cook from their parents
because of the declining frequency of this activity (Sidin, et al.2008). However, in-home food
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
37/66
33
and beverage preparation makes the consumer aware of the volume of natural resources that they
consume and can provide them with a form of self-expression separate from the market provision
(Cherrier 2009; Moser 2010; Shukla 2010; Soron 2010).
Box 2
Critical Aspects of Education Programs1)Incremental learning process: New ideas are introducedslowly over time2) Simple and clear instructions: Program design must beunderstandable to adherents3)Provision of required tools: Adherents must be providedwith the resources that they will need to carry out the program4) On-going support: Community support of the idea must bemaintained through new goals, constant information provision,and communication over long periods of time
Source(s): Babooram 2008; Kelleher Environmental2009;Waylen 2009
Public education campaigns use psychological methods for altering consumption
behaviour, but are faced with several challenges. Box 2, above, illustrates some of the primary
methods for altering behaviour through education programs. Current understanding of education
techniques is based on studies of how and why education programs have been effective; this
typically involves an evaluation of media source used, message clarity, its temporal duration and
spatial coverage, and resultant changes in public behaviour (Heath and Mitchell 2002).
Recycling programs are a good example of using education to alter behaviour (KE 2009).
Dominant social groups accepted recycling and encouraged wide-spread adoption of these
programs for two reasons; first, it addressedpeoples feelings of guilt over consumption
activities and encouraged them to monitor their neighbours simultaneously (KE 2009). Second,
the item-specific processing theory was used in marketing techniques to appeal to a specific
target audience (Heath and Mitchell 2002; Putrevu 2010). This involved highlighting select
features of recycling programs to encourage its public acceptability (Ayala, et al. 2008).
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
38/66
34
Educational programs for beverages are challenged by the intangible nature of this
experience good. Consequently, consumers are purchasing new beverages based on their past
experiences with taste, availability, and affordability (Boccalettie 2008; Sen and Block 2009;
Xue and Landis 2010). The diversity of each experience could challenge the structure of
education techniques, which rely on repetition to communicate. Additionally, language is the
mode through which values and ideas are transmitted to consumers; however, media can misuse
language in an effort to generate profit (Crescentini and Mainardi 2009; Dilevko and Gottlieb
2009; Laing and Frost 2010). The media is therefore a strong external force which can structure
public information in ways which benefit or harm educational initiatives (Humphreys 2010).
6. Conclusions and Recommendations
The three primary goals of this research were to describe beverage consumption habits
over time, identify what motivates individuals to purchase disposable beverage cups, and suggest
potential methods for reducing this market reliance. Secondary literature was used to provide
information on the environmental impacts of disposable beverage containers and beverage
consumption habits over the past 50 years. A survey was conducted over the phone with
residents of the DPPCT neighbourhood of Kitchener to ascertain possible factors motivating
current consumption levels. In-home beverage preparation was identified as the preferred, long-
term solution because it allows consumers to control their own environmental impacts (Hayes-
Conroy 2009). However, barriers to increasing in-home production activities were identified
from the literature as being the contextual factors of technology and urban sprawl, while it was
thought that consumers were internally motivated to purchase QSR items.
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
39/66
35
Although the source of hot beverages has changed, type and volume preferences remain
the same. The survey found that coffee continues to be the most popular beverage for residents,
and is consumed in greater volumes than tea. Overall consumption of both beverages is
declining due to the increasing popularity of pre-packaged health drinks. The source of
beverages is slowly evolving over time in response to changes in the restaurant industry.
Restaurants in Canada have maintained consistent growth over time; however, changing
consumer preferences, rising costs, and a saturated market are expected to reduce restaurant
patronage in the coming years. This is reflected in the findings of the study site, where in-home
beverage preparation was practiced regularly by respondents. Within the theoretical framework
of the HLC, it was determined that household needs were being satisfied by in-home preparation
of coffee and tea beverages. The low number of respondents who were Tim Hortons patrons
made it difficult to interpret which factors were most influential in their purchase decisions.
However, a comparison between data and the literature yielded several general conclusions.
Contextual factors, including technology and urban sprawl, were determined to have a
limited influence on respondents in the case study area. Labour-saving technologies in the home
have increased the amount of time that women spend on work and leisure activities outside of the
home; however, this trend has increased their number of responsibilities and associated levels of
time stress. Survey findings did not support the researchers belief that time stress was
contributing to the desirability of convenient, disposable QSR beverages. Although respondents
did indicate that they had limited available time, it could be that they are undergoing trade-offs in
their time distribution because they prefer the taste of their own beverages.
Long commutes associated with sprawling urban cities were thought to be affecting
household time allocation decisions. This would be particularly problematic for women already
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
40/66
36
pressured from a variety of different demands on their time. The DPPCT neighbourhood was
also found to have a high incidence of commuters due to the proximity of the Highway 401.
Consequently, it was thought that the purchase of convenience beverages would be valuable to
individuals during their commute to work. However, the length of time spent commuting by
respondents was low and few felt antagonistic towards the length of time they spent commuting.
Accordingly, urban sprawl does not appear to be contributing overtly to the beverage purchase
habits of survey respondents.
Internal motivations included multiple perspectives of consumption, emotional ties, and
social reference groups. Multiple factors are involved in each of these internal motivations, and
this study struggled to accurately capture each of the relevant motivations. It appeared that
respondents perceived consumption within the context of its utility to their lifestyle. The
findings also determined that other internal motivations were contributing to respondents Tim
Hortons purchase behaviours; consequently, there is a significant area of opportunity for
researchers to investigate motivational factors and use social interaction as a motivator for
preparing beverages in the home.
Solutions involved education and training techniques to encourage the adoption of social
methods for reducing disposable beverage container purchase. The literature evaluated in this
study clearly identifies how disposable beverage containers have significant environmental
impacts; they generate a significant amount of pollution during production, transportation, and
disposal phases. Their impacts are problematic for the achievement of sustainable consumption
for future generations. Households are frequently ignoring the importance of sustainable
consumption because they can no longer distinguish between goods which are needs and those
which are luxuries. This problem could develop when the individual consumer has certain
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
41/66
37
attitudes and perspectives towards the product. Consequently, solutions should be based on the
consumers perspectives of their consumption activities. Thiswould help motivate individual
consumers to take action on issues of environmental protection.
Modifying the Slow Food movement and Japanese Way of Tea ceremony to fit in with
the North American context could be valuable for altering current consumption patterns. Both
techniques are used here because of their strong focus on rewarding participants for their
participation in in-home preparation. The problems with both movements can be overcome
through the use of only certain portions of their ideas.
Education and training were identified as two methods for communicating the benefits of
the Slow Food Movement and Way of Tea ceremony to the general public. Training would
provide the public with an enhanced set of cooking skills in an effort to reduce their reliance on
QSR food and beverage items. Educational programs, though challenged by the experience
nature of this good, can effectively utilize media to encourage the wide-spread adoption of these
ideals in the dominant social groups of society.
Further studies on consumption motivations surrounding disposable beverages are
needed. Several decisions made by the researcher altered the results of this study and meant that
certain features were not clearly identified in the results. For example, future research could be
directed towards the barriers that individuals are confronted with during their attempts to develop
more environmentally-friendly behaviours. It would also be advantageous to conduct a complete
analysis of in-home consumption activities so that clear statistics can be used to argue in favour
of increasing this activity. Future studies might also consider paying for the expensive
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
42/66
38
demographic data collected by quick-service restaurants on their typical patrons to better link
personal characteristics to purchase of certain beverages.
7. References
Abrahamse, W., and Steg, L. 2009. How do socio-demographic and psychological factors relateto households direct and indirect energy use and savings? Journal of Economic
Psychology, 30(5): 711-720.
Adams, M., and Raisborough, J. 2010.Making a difference: Ethical consumption and theeveryday.The British Journal of Sociology, 61(2): 256-274.
Allen, S.R., Saccary, L., Wishart, J.G., and Vigneau, A.M. 2004.A Characterization of NovaScotian Litter: 2004 Litter Survey. Presented by Nova Scotia Youth Conservation Corps
& Nova Scotia Department of Environment and
Labour..
Accessed March 3rd, 2011.
8/12/2019 Disposable Hot Beverage Container Usage by Residents of Kitchener, Ontario: Causes, Consequences and Solutions
43/66
39
Alliance for Environmental Innovation. 2000.Report of the Starbucks coffee company/alliancefor environmental innovation joint task force. Produced in association withEnvironmentalDefence and The Pew CharitableTrusts.. Accessed on November 26th,2010.
Alsop, J., Field, T., Kalkreuth, J., Kemp, J., Malach, S., and Popper, A. 2004.Reusable Mugs:
Reducing Waste on Dalhousies Studley Campus.ENVS 3502- Environmental Problem
Solving, Dr. Tarah
Wright.. Accessed on March 3rd, 2011.
Amcor.2010. PET PackagingSustainability..Accessed on November 28th, 2010.
Andrews, G. 2008.The Slow Food Story: Politics and Pleasure. Kingston, ON: McGill-QueensUniversity Press.
Audirac, I. and Fitzgerald, J. 2003. Information technology (IT) and urban form: an annotatedbibliography of the urban deconcentration and economic restructuring literatures.Journalof Planning Literature, 17(4):480-511.
Auger, P. 2005. The impact of interactivity and design sophistication on the performance ofcommercial websites for small businesses.Journal of Small Business Management,43(2): 119-137.
Ayala, G.X., Rogers, M., Arredondo, E.M., Campbell, N.R., Baquero, B., Duerksen, S.C. andElder, J.P. 2008. Away-from-home food intake and risk for obesity: Examining theinfluence of context. Obesity, 16(5):1002-1008.
Babooram, A. 2008.Canadian participation in an environmentally active lifestyle. EnviroStats,2(4): 7-11. Ottawa, ON. Catalogue no. 16-002-X.. Accessed on September 28th, 2010.
Bakker, K., and Kooy, M. 2008. Governance failure: Rethinking the institutional dimensions ofurban water supply to poor households. World Development, 36(10):1891-1915.
Barrena, R. and Sanchez, M. 2010. The link between household structure and the level ofabstraction in the purchase decision process: an analysis using a functional food.Agribusiness, 26(2):243-264.
Beck, U. 1992.Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London, UK: Sage.
Bell, D., and Hollows, J. 2007. Mobile homes.Space and
Recommended