Diagnostic Tests

Diagnostic Tests

Afshin Ostovar

Bushehr University of Medical Sciences

Bushehr, 2013

04/20/23 1

A normal individual is a person; Who has not been sufficiently examined

04/20/23 2

Introduction

It is necessary to distinguish between people in the population who have the disease and those who do not.

clinical arenaPublic health arena

How good is the test in separating populations of people with and without the disease in question?

04/20/23 3

Biologic Variation of Human Populations

04/20/23 4

Bimodal curve

04/20/23 5

Unimodal curve

Validity of screening Tests

04/20/23 6

Tests with Dichotomous Results

04/20/23 7

Gold Standard

04/20/23 8

False Positive effectsBurden on the health care system

Labeling effect

04/20/23 9

False Negative effects

04/20/23 10

Tests of Continuous Variables

04/20/23 11

Sensitivity= 5/20 = 25%

Specificity= 18/20 = 90%

Tests of Continuous Variables

04/20/23 12

Sensitivity= 17/20 = 85%

Specificity= 6/20 = 30%

Different cut-offs

04/20/23 13

04/20/23 14

04/20/23 15

04/20/23 16

04/20/23 17

04/20/23 18

Multiple Tests

Sequential (Two-stage) Testing

Simultaneous (Parallel) Testing

04/20/23 19

Sequential (Two-stage) Testing

04/20/23 20

Test 1

Diabetes

+ _

Test Results+

_

10000

04/20/23 21

Prevalence = 5%

Diabetes

+ _

Test Results+

_

500 9500 10000

04/20/23 22

Sensitivity = 70%

Diabetes

+ _

Test Results+ 350

_ 150

500 9500 10000

04/20/23 23

Specificity = 80%

Diabetes

+ _

Test Results+ 350 1900

_ 150 7600

500 9500 10000

04/20/23 24

Final Result of Test 1

Diabetes

+ _

Test Results+ 350 1900 2250

_ 150 7600 7750

500 9500 10000

04/20/23 25

Test 2

Diabetes

+ _

Test Results+

_

350 1900 2250

04/20/23 26

Sensitivity= 90%

Diabetes

+ _

Test Results+ 315

_ 35

350 1900 2250

04/20/23 27

Specificity=90%

Diabetes

+ _

Test Results+ 315 190

_ 35 1710

350 1900 2250

04/20/23 28

Final Result of two Tests

Diabetes

+ _

Test Results+ 315 190 2250

_ 185 9310 7750

500 9500 10000

04/20/23 29

Net sensitivity = 315/500 = 63%

Net Specificity = 9310/9600 = 98%

Simultaneous Testing

04/20/23 30

Test A

04/20/23 31

Test B

04/20/23 32

04/20/23 33

04/20/23 34

Test A

04/20/23 35

Test B

04/20/23 36

04/20/23 37

04/20/23 38

Predictive Value

Predictive Value PositiveIf the test results are positive in this

patient, what is the probability that this patient has the disease.

Predictive Value NegativeIf the test results are negative in this

patient, what is the probability that this patient do not have the disease

04/20/23 39

Predictive Value Positive

04/20/23 40

The predictive value is affected by two factors:

o the prevalence of the disease in the population tested

o the specificity of the test being used, when the disease is infrequent.

04/20/23 41

Relationship between Predictive Value and Disease Prevalence

04/20/23 42

Relationship between Predictive Value and Disease Prevalence

04/20/23 43

Relationship between Predictive Value and Disease Prevalence

04/20/23 44

04/20/23 45

04/20/23 46

Relationship between Predictive Value and

Specificity

04/20/23 47

Relationship between Predictive Value and

Specificity

04/20/23 48

Relationship between Predictive Value and

Specificity

04/20/23 49

Relationship between Predictive Value and

Specificity

04/20/23 50