View
0
Download
0
Category
Preview:
Citation preview
Development and Simulation of Recharge Scenarios to Enhance Springflow
Joshua “Bud” Davis, PhD1
Lisa Baker, PE2
Rachel Pieschek, PE1
1Drummond Carpenter, PLLC, Orlando, FL 328172Locklear and Associates, Inc., Gainesville, FL 32606
12019 Florida Stormwater Assoc. Annual Conference6/20/19
Introduction
2
Natural North Florida
Dixie Co. Chamber
SRWMD
Intro Data Model Results Application
Focus Sites
3
Natural North Florida
Dixie Co. Chamber
SRWMD
Lower Suwannee
Cow Pond
Intro Data Model Results Application
Ditching and Draining
4
Natural North Florida
Dixie Co. Chamber
SRWMD
Intro Data Model Results Application
Ditching and Draining
5
Natural North Florida
Dixie Co. Chamber
SRWMD
Locklear
Intro Data Model Results Application
Ditching and Draining
6
Natural North Florida
Dixie Co. Chamber
SRWMD
Locklear
Intro Data Model Results Application
Motivation
restore ponds and wetlandswildlife habitataquifer rechargeenhance springflowreduce direct runoff
7
Natural North Florida
Dixie Co. Chamber
SRWMD
Intro Data Model Results Application
Current Status
developed ICPR v4 modeltwo dimensionalcoupled groundwater/surface watercalibrated
applied restoration testingfuture works
informed stakeholder engagementmodel extension
8
Natural North Florida
Dixie Co. Chamber
SRWMD
Intro Data Model Results Application
Area of Interest: Lower Suwannee
flat topographylower suwannee: 3-45 asl
9
railroad grade
drainage channel
outlet
paleo-avulsions
SuwanneeRiver
Intro Data Model Results Application
Intro Data Model Results Application
Water Level Monitoring
10
Water Level Monitoring
11Intro Data Model Results Application
Water Level Monitoring
12
Non-continuous 10/2017 Continuous 7/1/2018
SRWMD
SR
Intro Data Model Results Application
Water Level Monitoring
13
Summer Flooding
Intro Data Model Results Application
Summer Flooding
14
Dixie Co. Locklear
Intro Data Model Results Application
Summer Flooding
15
Dixie Co. Locklear
Intro Data Model Results Application
Summer Flooding
16
Dixie Co.
Intro Data Model Results Application
Summer Flooding
17
Dixie Co.
Intro Data Model Results Application
Summer Flooding
18
Dixie Co. Locklear
Intro Data Model Results Application
Summer Flooding
19
Dixie Co. Locklear
Intro Data Model Results Application
Summer Flooding
20
Dixie Co. Locklear
Intro Data Model Results Application
Water Level Monitoring
21
December Flooding
Intro Data Model Results Application
December Flooding
22
Dixie Co. Drummond Carpenter
Intro Data Model Results Application
December Flooding
23
Dixie Co. Drummond Carpenter
Intro Data Model Results Application
December Flooding
24
Dixie Co. Drummond Carpenter
Intro Data Model Results Application
December Flooding
25
Dixie Co. Drummond Carpenter
Intro Data Model Results Application
Intro Data Model Results Application
Surveying
26
Surveying
27
Locklear Locklear
Intro Data Model Results Application
Channel Restoration
clearing effort between 06/2018 and 09/2018
28
SRWMD
Dixie Co.
Locklear
Intro Data Model Results Application
Channel Restoration
clearing effort between 06/2018 and 09/2018
29
SRWMD
Dixie Co.
Locklear
Intro Data Model Results Application
Channel Restoration
clearing effort between 06/2018 and 09/2018
30
SRWMD
Dixie Co.
Locklear
Intro Data Model Results Application
Precipitation Data
31
December FloodingSummer Flooding
Intro Data Model Results Application
Precipitation Data
32Intro Data Model Results Application
Precipitation Data – July to Sep.
33Intro Data Model Results Application
Precipitation Data – Nov. to Jan.
34Intro Data Model Results Application
Calibration Period
35
December Flooding
Intro Data Model Results Application
Calibration Period
36
2018 2019Today
Jun Aug Oct Dec Feb Apr Jun
6/26/2018 - 6/20/2019Continuous GW Monitoring
7/22/2018 - 9/12/2018Summer Flooding
12/14/2018 - 12/29/2018December Flooding
6/24/2018 - 9/28/2018Channel Clearing
8/1/2018 - 9/30/2018Low Qual. Precip.
12/1/2018 - 12/22/2018Current Calibration Period
12/1/2018 - 5/1/2019Target Calibration Period
Intro Data Model Results Application
Water Level Monitoring
37
December Flooding
Intro Data Model Results Application
Water Level Monitoring
38Intro Data Model Results Application
Intro Data Model Results Application
Water Level Monitoring
39
ICPR v4 Model
40
280 nodes300 linkscoupled groundwater and surface waterspatially varying subsurface conditionstime-varying boundary conditions surface water mesh
Intro Data Model Results Application
ICPR v4 Model
41
280 nodes300 linkscoupled groundwater and surface waterspatially varying subsurface conditionstime-varying boundary conditions groundwater mesh
Intro Data Model Results Application
Intro Data Model Results Application
Calibration
boundary conditionsroughness
green-ampt parametershydraulic conductivity
effective porosity42
Intro Data Model Results Application
Calibration
43
(Marsalek et al, 1975)
Intro Data Model Results Application
Calibration
44
Intro Data Model Results Application
Calibration
45
Locklear
Calibration
46Intro Data Model Results Application
Drummond Carpenter
Intro Data Model Results Application
Calibration
47
Calibration
48Intro Data Model Results Application
roughness – landusega – web soil surveyhyd. cond. – slug testseff. porosity – 0.10 to 0.25
Intro Data Model Results Application
Calibration Results
49
(Marsalek et al, 1975)
Intro Data Model Results Application
Calibration Results – 18% Error
50
0.35 ft
Intro Data Model Results Application
Calibration Results
51
(Marsalek et al, 1975)
Intro Data Model Results Application
Calibration Results – 4% Error
52
0.2 ft
Intro Data Model Results Application
Calibration Results
53
(Marsalek et al, 1975)
Intro Data Model Results Application
Calibration Results – 4% Error
54
0.1 ft
Modeling Results
55
12/1/2018
0 45
Intro Data Model Results Application
ft
Modeling Results
56
12/21/2018
Intro Data Model Results Application
0 45ft
Intro Data Model Results Application
Modeling Results
57
12/21/2018
0 14.3ft
Model Application
58
Locklear
Intro Data Model Results Application
B
A
C D
Model Application
59Intro Data Model Results Application
A
B
C D
Model Application
60Intro Data Model Results Application
DC
B
A
Model Application – Design Storms
61
Dixie Co. 100YR_024HR
Intro Data Model Results Application
A B C D
Model Application - Continuous
comparison with calibrated model
800,000 sq. ft. in new recharge area
additional 150 mgd of recharge over period
62
Dixie Co. Dec. Floods
Intro Data Model Results Application
B
C D
A
long-period calibrationrestoration design testingstakeholder engagementmodel extension/connection
Future Works
63Intro Data Model Results Application
Conclusions
developed ICPR v4 modeltwo dimensionalcoupled groundwater/surface waterprelim. calibrated
applied restoration testingrecharge opportunities
64
Natural North Florida
Dixie Co. Chamber
SRWMD
Intro Data Model Results Application
Questions?Special thanks to:
65Intro Data Model Results Application
DCRachel Pieschek Don Carpenter Chad DrummondRyan Hupfer
LocklearLisa Baker John Locklear Walker Wrenn Jered Lizotte
Dixie CoTim Alexander Duane Cannon
SRWMDBob HeekeFay Baird
Recommended