Developing SMART statements of commitments

Developing SMART statements of commitments

2014 HLM Preparatory Webinar seriesWebinar 5 – 20 February 2013

2

• Introductions and house rules (translation/ chat/questions)

• Preparation checklist

• Developing SMART HLM Commitments: Outputs

• Developing SMART HLM Commitments: ‘ Golden Rules’

• Developing SMART HLM Commitments: Process

• Q & A

Agendas Decision-making for WASH

Prep checklist

4

Preparatory tracks to the HLM

Donors dialogue

Dev. Countries dialogue

Advocacy/ engagement

HLM

11 Apr. 2014

Commitments

SMM

10 Apr. 2014

Sum-mary slide

Statement of

Commit-ments

SWA partners/donors in

country

ELIMINATING INEQUALITYIMPROVING SUSTAINABILITY

UNIVERSAL ACCESS

5

Prep Checklist – So far

Technical Sector dialogue

2nd/3rd timers 1st timers

1. Meet Ministers of Finance

2. Agree plan with stakeholders

3. Send status of 2012 Commitments

4. Review priorities bottlenecks

5. Draft 2014 Commitments

Observers

Dec - Jan Dec

9 Feb

Jan

Feb

Mar

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

70% of countries already

responded

6

Prep Checklist – Next steps

Technical Sector dialogue

2nd/3rd timers 1st timers

7. Send RSVP

9. Send slides

8. Final Validation of statements

10. Final briefing of Ministers

Observers

5 Mar

7 Mar

31 Mar

1 Apr

5 Mar

7 Mar

31 Mar

1 Apr

6. Send 2014 Commitments for review (optional)

28 Mar28 Mar

7 Mar

1 Apr

4 countries already sent

7

Focus on Developing Commitments

Technical Sector dialogue

Advocacy/ engagement

Prep DIALOGUE

AnalyticalTOOLS

Articulation of commitments

COUNTRY STATEMENTof commitments

SUMMARY of commitments

By 5 Mar. 2014

By 10 Apr. 2014

4 slides for the SMM

1 slide for the HLM

Outputs of the HLCD (inputs to the HLM/SMM)

9

Output 1: Statement of commitments

1. Key Sector Indicators

2. Long term vision and focus for 2014-2016

3. Key bottlenecks identified

4. Summary of progress on 2012 HLM Commitments

5. Key 4-6 SMART commitments

6. Validation

Structure (2 pages max):

10

Output 2: Four slides

Slide 4 is to be

presented at the HLM

11

Slide 1: The vision

1. Today’s situation: Key Sector Indicators• Coverage and disparities

2. Focus for 2014-2016• Indicate focus achievements between 2014-2016

3. Long term vision • Indicate a roadmap towards universal access • Indicate how the roadmap will address elimination

of inequalities and improvement of sustainability

12

Slide 2: The challenges

4. Key bottlenecks• Identify the key barriers and bottlenecks that

you aim at tackling

5. Process of identification• Describe the process, the actors and the

sources involved

13

Slide 3: The progress on 2012 commitments

6. Key achievement areas• Indicate in which category of commitments you

made most progressed7. Areas of incomplete progress

• Indicate which type of commitments represented most challenges and why

8. Carry-over to 2014• Indicate which commitments will be carried over,

but with a different angle, to 2014

14

Slide 4: 2014 Commitments

9. Commitments contributing to Sustainability• 2-3 SMART commitments

10. Contributing to Eliminating Inequalities• 2-3 SMART commitments

Will be presented at the HLM too

‘Golden rules’ for SMART commitments

16

Framework: 1 bold vision 11 areas of action

ELIMINATING INEQUALITYIMPROVING SUSTAINABILITY

11 Key areas of action

1 Bold vision

Political Prioritization

Evidence Based Dec-Making

National Processes

1. Financing 2. Visibility

3. Global Monitoring4. National

monitoring systems5. Transparency6. Evidence7. Linking monitoring

to planning

8. Policy & Plans9. Coordination and aligment10. Decentralization11. Capacity (including HR)

UNIVERSAL ACCESS

17

Learning from 2012 HLM commitments: a melting pot?

18

Learning from 2012 HLM commitments: a melting pot?

Screen-shot on commitments from website; both circles and the histogram

Political Prioritization

EvidenceBased Decisions

National Processes

19

Creative tensions of 2012 HLM commitments

1. Too Many vs. Too Few

2. Old vs. New

3. Quick wins vs. Structural Changes

4. Broad vs. Specific

24

The rules of dream 2014 HLM commitments

1. Few, but of quality

2. Rooted in plans, but with a new lens

3. Sequence short-term and structural

4. SWA –MART: Smart and SWA categories

1. Too few vs. too little

2. Old vs. New

3. Short-term vs. structural

4. Broad vs. Specific

2012 HLM 2014 HLM

25

1. Few, but of quality

‘90 second’ rule- Max. 5 commitments- Commitments tell a story to the high level

‘game-changing’ rule- Bold commitments that will carry a step-change on:

1. Sustainability2. Elimination of inequalities 3. Universal access

26

2. Rooted in plans, but with new lens

Good commitments are - rooted in existing plans- Understand bottlenecks of unfinished agenda

- Recognise shifting agenda (Universal access, tackling inequalities, sutainabiliy, aid-effectiveness) - will be integrated in next planning cycle

BUT

Balance Rule

27

3. Sequence short vs. long term

‘Approppriate timeframe’ rule

- Quick wins for ‘1st timers / 2 yr. periods- For 2nd timers, focus should shift to structural changes

28

4. Make them SWA-MART

Specific

Measurable

Achievable

Relevant

Timebound

NO

Ensure coordination of sector activities

?

NO

?

?

‘SMART rule’

29

4. SWA- MART

Specific

Measurable

Achievable

Relevant

Timebound

YES

Establish over the next two years a fully formal coordination mechanism for partners jointly provided by Ministry of Health and Ministry of Public Works

YES

YES?

?

SMART

30

4. SWA- MART

Specific

Measurable

Achievable

Relevant

Timebound

NO

Inclusion of sanitation in the political agenda

?

NO?

?

SMART

31

4. SWA- MART

Specific

Measurable

Achievable

Relevant

Timebound

Yes

Include Sanitation as priority in the Growth Strategy for Poverty Reduction Document (2014-2018) and Government Priority Actions Program (2014-2018)

?

Yes?

Yes

SMART

32

4. SWA- MART

Specific

Measurable

Achievable

Relevant

Timebound

Yes

Include Sanitation as priority in the Growth Strategy for Poverty Reduction Document (2014-2018) and Government Priority Actions Program (2014-2018)

?

Yes?

Yes

SMART

33

4a. SWA Specific

• Indicate an action, lead ans supporting ministers/parners

• Makes sense at country level • BUT fits into SWA CATERGORIES

Political Prioritization

Evidence Based Dec-Making

National Processes

1. Financing 2. Visibility

3. Global Monitoring4. National

monitoring systems5. Transparency6. Evidence7. Linking monitoring

to planning

8. Policy & Plans9. Coordination and aligment10. Decentralization11. Capacity

34

4b. SWA Measurable

• No global/ common indicators• BUT country-specific indicator included upfront • Check for measurability by national systems

35

4c. Achievable

ACHIEVABLE:

- Consistent with progress on previous commitments

- Consistent with what other countries do- Anticipating all facets/ level off effort required

E.g.: Build knowledge-sharing networks 1yr later: centres have been built but no meny to run them!

36

4d. Relevant

Fit to fix the main problems!

Comitments reflect:1. Key sector bottlenecks – JSRs, CSOs, BAT, JSR,

GLAAS2. Progress of previous commitments - SWA update3. Country broader priorities - PSRP etc.4. Commitments in regional/global fora - AfricaSan,

SACOSAN

37

4d. Timebound

Timebound:

- What can be achieved before 2016?- If the comitment is longer term, then it should be broken

down into milestones, one of which should be achievable by 2016

38

What happens to 2012HLM commitments in 2014?

1. Has the 2012 HLM commitment been achieved?

Yes Par-tially

YesNo

2. Is the commitment still relevant to the current context ?

Archive commitment Analyze barriers and refocus/rephrase

Process and tools

42

The process of developing HLM commitments

6. Getting stakeholders together7. Analyzing bottlenecks and previous progress8. Balancing old and new priorities9. Aligning with regional processes10. Linking Post-2015 country consultations

PREPDIALOGUE

o9p0

Support from the secretariat

45

SWA Website: Global comparisons

• Guidance notes• Sample statement of commitments• SWA website- progress of commitments• GLAAS profiles• Econ Cases• Review of draft statement of commitments• Template for slides

46

SWA Website: Global comparisons