View
221
Download
0
Category
Tags:
Preview:
Citation preview
Department of Internal Affairs
New Zealand Government Web Accessibility
Self-Assessments
Jason KissSenior Advisor - Digital EngagementDept. of Internal AffairsJason.kiss@dia.govt.nzTwitter: @jkiss
Department of Internal Affairs
Overview
• Background and context
• Goals
• Methodology
• Analysis
• Results
• Conclusions
• Future plans
Department of Internal Affairs
Background and Context
New Zealand• ~4.5 million people
• Earthquakes (15K/yr)
• New flag?
Department of Internal Affairs
Background and Context
New Zealand• Relatively small government
• ~500 central government websites
• User-centred consolidation underway
• Few accessibility experts and consultants
Department of Internal Affairs
Background and Context
2003NZ Government Web Guidelines• Cabinet mandate
• All core government agencies ( currently ~33)
• WCAG 1.0
Department of Internal Affairs
Background and Context
December 2008
Department of Internal Affairs
Background and Context
March 2009 NZ Government Web Standards 2.0• WCAG 2.0 AA + “New Zealand Layer”
Department of Internal Affairs
Background and Context
2011 Self-Assessments• Very simple
• Results not very useful
• But, indicated significant variability in govt and vendor knowledge and skill
Department of Internal Affairs
Background and Context
2012-13 • Consultation on new Web Standards:
– Govt agencies
– Disability communities
–Web design/development firms
• Web Standards Working Group (WSWG)
Department of Internal Affairs
Background and Context
July 2013 NZ Govt Web Accessibility Standard• WCAG 2.0 AA + some exceptions• 4 year implementation schedule• “High-stakes” vs. “core” content
Department of Internal Affairs
Background and Context
WCAG 2.0 Exceptions• Complex visual maps• Full text alternatives over audio description• Captions: 10 day grace period except for
“high-stakes” content• Live captions: only for “high-stakes” content
Department of Internal Affairs
GOALS: 2014 Self-Assessments
Not a compliance exercise!• Report on agency progress after 1 yr• Baseline for continual improvement• Raise awareness, knowledge and skill
Department of Internal Affairs
GOALS: 2014 Self-Assessments
How• Identify most common Web Standards issues• Assess risks and identify plans to address• Self-assessment workshops• Inform training and education for agencies
and vendors
Department of Internal Affairs
METHODOLOGY: 2014 Self-Assessments
Fit for purpose• Each agency…• From across all its websites…
Up to 5 home pages
Up to 5 contact us
pages
68 (max) random pages
+ +
Department of Internal Affairs
METHODOLOGY : 2014 Self-Assessments
Fit for purpose• Simple results spreadsheet• Easy-to-understand guides for in-house
assessment
Department of Internal Affairs
METHODOLOGY : 2014 Self-Assessments
Page selection• Weighted toward the most visited pages from
the agency's most visited websites.• Suggested procedures for selecting pages, e.g.
Google Analytics
Department of Internal Affairs
METHODOLOGY: 2014 Self-Assessments
Page assessment• In-house, external vendor, or combination?• Assessment guides for practical help• Incorrect/inaccurate assessment expected
Department of Internal Affairs
METHODOLOGY: 2014 Self-Assessments
Risk registerGroup, rate, and prioritise associated risks:–Where is the biggest bang for the buck?– Immediate fix or wait for redesign?– How to respond if the risk occurs?
Department of Internal Affairs
ANALYSIS: 2014 Self-Assessments
Auditing the results• Web Standards Working Group (WSWG)• 5 pages from each assessment:– 1 home page– 1 contact us page– 3 random pages
Department of Internal Affairs
ANALYSIS: 2014 Self-Assessments
Risk register reviewBest effort to:• Check rated impact severity of identified risks• Find risks that were overlooked
Department of Internal Affairs
Department of Internal Affairs
RESULTS: 2014 Self-Assessments
Risk register analysis – rating severity• Severity of most risks was overrated
• Cause of a risk is not the same thing as its occurrence
• Cost of removing a risk is not the cost of dealing with its occurrence
• More guidance on risk assessment needed!
Department of Internal Affairs
RESULTS: 2014 Self-Assessments
Risk register analysis – missing risks• Compared agencies’ results w/ WSWG audits
• 79% missing at least one risk
• +50% missing at least four or more risks
• More guidance on risk assessment needed!
Department of Internal Affairs
Number of risks
identified(% of total)
WCAG 2.0 Guideline Specific risk causes
60 (15%)
Provide ways to help users navigate, find content, and determine where they are.
Lack of visible focus; incorrectly assessed bypass blocks; ambiguous link purpose, often incorrectly assessed.
57 (14%)
Make it easier for users to see and hear content including separating foreground from background.
Insufficient colour contrast; information communicated solely through colour (esp. links); text delivered in images instead of as text.
56 (14%)
Create content that can be presented in different ways (for example simpler layout) without losing information or structure.
Form labels not programmatically associated with form fields; headings not marked up as headings; general semantic relationships not provided in HTML mark-up.
Department of Internal Affairs
RESULTS: 2014 Self-Assessments
Risk register analysis – mitigationFew risk registers:• Identified remedial actions w/ start/end dates
• Integrated remedial actions with websites’ design or development plans
• Considered responses if a risk manifested
• More guidance on risk assessment needed!
Department of Internal Affairs
RESULTS: 2014 Self-Assessments
Agencies’ self-assessed scores
Department of Internal Affairs
Requirement Average compliance rate (%)
WCAG 2.4.7 Focus Visible 56%
WCAG 4.1.1 Parsing 57%
WCAG 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) 62%
WCAG 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks 63%
WCAG 1.3.1 Info and Relationships 67%
WCAG 1.1.1 Non-text Content 70%
WCAG 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value 72%
Department of Internal Affairs
RESULTS: 2014 Self-Assessments
WSWG audit scores
Department of Internal Affairs
Requirement Average compliance rate (%)
WCAG 1.3.1 Info and Relationships 25%
WCAG 1.1.1 Non-text Content 34%
WCAG 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) 36%
WCAG 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value 36%
WCAG 2.4.7 Focus Visible 38%
WCAG 4.1.1 Parsing 54%
WCAG 1.4.1 Use of Color 64%
Department of Internal Affairs
RESULTS: 2014 Self-Assessments
Self-assessed vs. audit scores
Department of Internal Affairs
Self-assessments WSWG audits
WCAG 2.4.7 Focus Visible WCAG 1.3.1 Info and Relationships
WCAG 4.1.1 Parsing WCAG 1.1.1 Non-text Content
WCAG 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) WCAG 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)
WCAG 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks WCAG 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value
WCAG 1.3.1 Info and Relationships WCAG 2.4.7 Focus Visible
WCAG 1.1.1 Non-text Content WCAG 4.1.1 Parsing
WCAG 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value WCAG 1.4.1 Use of Color
Department of Internal Affairs
RESULTS: 2014 Self-Assessments
Audit variances• Difference between the two scores
• Indication of accuracy or understanding
• Some passing marks the WSWG audits considered failures, and vice versa
• Greater the variance, the less the reqt was understood or accurately assessed
Department of Internal Affairs
WCAG
1.3.1
WCAG
1.1.1
WCAG
1.4.3
WCAG
4.1.2
WCAG
2.4.7
WCAG
4.1.1
WCAG
1.4.1
WCAG
2.4.4
WCAG
2.1.1
WCAG
1.4.5
WCAG
2.4.6
WCAG
3.3.2
WCAG
3.1.2
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Avg WSWG audit compliance scoreLinear (Avg WSWG audit compliance score)Avg difference between audit and self-assessed compliance scoresLinear (Avg difference between audit and self-assessed compliance scores)
Department of Internal Affairs
RESULTS: 2014 Self-Assessments
Audit variances – Interesting bits• Top 5 reqts with highest variance are in the
top 7 with the lowest compliance
• These top 5 reqts are:– common failures across agency web pages– the most often incorrectly assessed or
understood
Department of Internal Affairs
RESULTS: 2014 Self-Assessments
Audit variances – Interesting bits• Top 5 reqts arguably 5 of the most important:–WCAG 1.1.1 Non-text Content–WCAG 1.3.1 Info and Relationships–WCAG 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)–WCAG 2.4.7 Focus Visible–WCAG 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value
Department of Internal Affairs
CONCLUSIONS: 2014 Self-Assessments
A worthwhile effort• Improved understanding of accessibility
• Opportunity to discuss, learn, and ask
• Confirm, with evidence, most common issues
• Better understand current state
• Identify what needs improvemement
• Inform training and education
Department of Internal Affairs
FUTURE PLANS
Department of Internal Affairs
FUTURE PLANS: 2014 Self-Assessments
Workshops – govt and vendors• Shift focus from compliance to risk mgmt• Integrate with govt ICT maturity model• Focus on most common and least
understood requirements • Help agencies understand the ‘why’ • Embed accessibility in day-to-day processes
Department of Internal Affairs
FUTURE PLANS: 2014 Self-Assessments
More practical guidance• Web Accessibility Standard Assessment Guide
will be published• Direct people to and help them navigate
existing guidance and resources
Department of Internal Affairs
FUTURE PLANS: 2014 Self-Assessments
Virtual community of expertise• Stop relying on one working group or team• Take a coaching role and deliver hands-on
training to lift capability• Build community of advocates and experts
across agencies, vendors, jurisdictions• Openly share our experiences, good and bad
Department of Internal Affairs
…like here at OZeWAI!
Thanks.
Recommended