debate stock issues.pdf

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 1/24

Basic Positions Affirmative

Supports the resolution

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 2/24

Basic Positions Affirmative

Supports the resolution

Proves the Status Quo (present system) isbad

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 3/24

Basic Positions Affirmative

Supports the resolution

Proves the Status Quo (present system) isbad

Presents the Need for Change (Case)

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 4/24

Basic Positions Affirmative

Supports the resolution

Proves the Status Quo (present system) isbad

Presents the Need for Change (Case)

Presents their Plan for Change (Plan)

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 5/24

Basic Positions Affirmative

Supports the resolution

Proves the Status Quo (present system) isbad

Presents the Need for Change (Case)

Presents their Plan for Change (Plan) Shows an advantage/solution to their Plan

(Advantages)

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 6/24

Basic Positions Negative

Negates the Resolution

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 7/24

Basic Positions Negative

Negates the Resolution

 Argues that there is no reason to change

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 8/24

Basic Positions Negative

Negates the Resolution

 Argues that there is no reason to change

 Argues the Affirmative Plan will not work 

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 9/24

Basic Positions Negative

Negates the Resolution

 Argues that there is no reason to change

 Argues the Affirmative Plan will not work 

 Argues the Affirmative has not met its

responsibilities

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 10/24

Basic Positions Negative

Negates the Resolution

 Argues that there is no reason to change

 Argues the Affirmative Plan will not work 

 Argues the Affirmative has not met its

responsibilities Argues the Affirmative would be worse

than the Status Quo (the present system)

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 11/24

Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem 

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 12/24

Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem 

Significance: How big is the problem?

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 13/24

Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem 

Significance: How big is the problem?

Quantitative

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 14/24

Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem 

Significance: How big is the problem?

Quantitative

Qualitative

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 15/24

Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem 

Significance: How big is the problem?

Quantitative

Qualitative

Inherency: Why does the problem exist?

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 16/24

Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem 

Significance: How big is the problem?

Quantitative

Qualitative

Inherency: Why does the problem exist?

Structural: A law or ruling that causes theharm

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 17/24

Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem 

Significance: How big is the problem?

Quantitative Qualitative

Inherency: Why does the problem exist?

Structural: A law or ruling that causes the harm

 Attitudinal: The attitudes of policy makers/businesses, etc. cause the harm

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 18/24

Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem 

Significance: How big is the problem?

Quantitative Qualitative

Inherency: Why does the problem exist?

Structural: A law or ruling that causes the harm

 Attitudinal: The attitudes of policy makers/businesses, etc. cause the harm

Gap: No laws or rulings exist to solve the problem

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 19/24

Stock Issues in Debate Harm: What’s the problem 

Significance: How big is the problem?

Quantitative Qualitative

Inherency: Why does the problem exist? Structural: A law or ruling that causes the harm

 Attitudinal: The attitudes of policy makers/businesses, etc. cause the harm

Gap: No laws or rulings exist to solve the problem

Existential: The problem exists; no cause has been

found.

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 20/24

Stock Issues

Solvency

Proof that the action of the affirmative plan

will solve the problem

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 21/24

Stock Issues

Solvency

Proof that the action of the affirmative plan

will solve the problem *Topicality *A Voting Issue

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 22/24

Stock Issues

Solvency

Proof that the action of the affirmative plan

will solve the problem *Topicality *A Voting Issue

For the affirmative: an unstated conditionof the affirmative plan being a part of theresolution

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 23/24

Stock Issues

Solvency Proof that the action of the affirmative plan

will solve the problem

*Topicality *A Voting Issue For the affirmative: an unstated condition

of the affirmative plan being a part of the

resolution For the negative: an issue to bring up

when the aff. plan is not part of theresolution

7/27/2019 debate stock issues.pdf

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/debate-stock-issuespdf 24/24

To Review the Basic Voting

Issues: Significance

Harms Inherency

(Topicality)

Solvency