Crater Lake-Klamath Regional Airport (LMT) Airport Master...

Virtual Public Open House

May 6, 2020

5:30 PM to 7 PM

Crater Lake-Klamath Regional Airport (LMT)

Airport Master Plan Update

Welcome and Introductions

▪ LMT Airport Staff

▪ Mead & Hunt Team

Master Plan Advisory Committee (MPAC)

Name Organization

Joe Wall City of Klamath Falls

Jon Anderson City of Klamath Falls

Mark Willrett City of Klamath Falls

Erik Nobel County of Klamath

Jim Chadderdon Discover Klamath

Rick Flowers Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA)

Robert Tykoski FAA Seattle ADO

Ed Langerveld Fixed Base Operator (FBO)

Justin Dunaway Fixed Base Operator (FBO)

Dr. Roberto Gutierrez Klamath Community College (KCC)

Heather Tramp Klamath County Chamber of Commerce

Julie Matthews Klamath County Economic Development Association (KCEDA)

Randy Cox Klamath County Economic Development Association (KCEDA)

Captain Joe Young Oregon ANG

LtCol Jason Nalepa (Weave) Oregon ANG

Captain Oscar Alonso Oregon ANG

Major Zachary Johnson (Ruckus) Oregon ANG

Heather Peck Oregon DOT - Department of Aviation

Sandra Fox Oregon Institute of Technology (OIT)

Paul Stewart Sky Lakes Medical Center

Betty Riley South Central Oregon Economic Development District (SCOEDD)

Don Cavin US Forest Service

Meeting Topics

Project Overview 15 minutes

Master Plan Update 60 minutes▪ Inventory

▪ Forecast

▪ Facilities Requirements

▪ Development Alternatives

Next Steps 10 minutes

WE ARE HERE.

Master Plan Process

FAA Review Status

Inventory

▪ AcceptedNov 2018

Forecast

▪ Approved Feb 2019

▪ Additions

Approved

Mar 2020

Facility Reqs

▪ Accepted Dec 2019

▪ Prelim Comments Mar 2020

Alternatives

Master Plan Update

Inventory

▪ South-central Oregon

▪ 15 miles north of California

▪ South-central Klamath County

Airport Location

▪ Unique Factor #1

▪ Owned by City of Klamath Falls

▪ Base for 173rd FW, Oregon ANG

▪ LMT Property

▪ 1,166 acres

▪ 255 acres for Oregon ANG

Airport Property

▪ Runways

▪ Runway 14/32: 10,301’ x 150’

▪ Runway 7/25: 5,258 x 100’

▪ Unique Factor #2

▪ 109+ lane miles of pavement

▪ 345,000 s.f. (7.9 acres) of paint markings

▪ 731+ lights

▪ 90+ lighted signs

▪ 24,000 s.f. terminal building space

▪ 45,000 linear feet (8.5 miles) of fence

Airfield

West Building Area Northeast Building Area

Ramp

SASO

Northeast

Ramp

▪ City of Klamath Falls (colors)

▪ Residential to NE

▪ Industrial/Business Park to W

▪ Mix of uses in city center (5 miles N)

▪ County of Klamath

▪ Residential to N

▪ Agricultural to E/S/W

Adjacent Land Uses

Master Plan Update

Aviation Forecast

Aviation Activity Forecast: Critical Aircraft

Critical Aircraft: Runway 14/32

Aircraft Design Characteristics:

Aircraft DC-10

Aircraft Type: Tri-Engine Transport Jet

FAA ARC/TDG: D-IV; TDG 5

Approach Speed: 150 Knots

Wingspan: 165'

Length: 82'

Tailheight: 57'

Maximum Weight: 555,000 Pounds

Seating Configuration: 2 Pilot Crew

Cockpit to Main Gear (CMG) 88'

Wheelbase 72'

Main Gear Width (MGW) 35'

Future: DC 10

Existing (speed): F-15

Existing (size): Avro RJ-85

Existing Runway

Design Code: D-III

Future Runway Design

Code: D-IV

Critical Aircraft: Runway 7/25

Aircraft Design Characteristics:

Aircraft: Beechcraft King Air 350/1900

Aircraft Type: Twin Engine Turboprop

FAA ARC/TDG: B-II; TDG 2

Approach Speed: 113 Knots

Wingspan: 58'

Length: 57'

Tailheight: 16'

Maximum Weight: 17,200 Pounds

Seating Configuration: 2 Crew + 10± Passengers

Cockpit to Main Gear (CMG) 16'

Wheelbase 24'

Main Gear Width (MGW) 17'

Existing / Future

Runway Design Code:

B-II

Master Plan Update

Runway System

Facility Requirements: Runway 14/32

▪ Shoulder Width

▪ Blast Pads

▪ Runway 14 ROFA

▪ Runway 14 ILS

Runway End 14 Runway End 32 Runway End 14 Runway End 32

Runway Type

FAA Runway Design Code (RDC)

FAA Taxiway Design Group (TDG)

Military UFC Classification

Runway Facility Systems

Runway Length x Width

Runway Shoulder Width (Type)

Paved Blast Pad (W x L) 150' x 200' 150' x 200' 150' x 200' 150' x 200'

Paved Stopway/Overrun (W x L) 150' x 1,002' 150' x 1,000' 150' x 1,002' 150' x 1,000'

Runway Displaced Threshold

Arresting Gear (Military Use Only) Yes Yes Yes Yes

Land and Hold Short (LASHO)

In-Line Taxiway

Runway-to-Runway Separation

Pavement and Markings

Pavement Strength - Pounds

(Aircraft Main GearType)

Pavement Surface Course

Pavement Markings

Runway Lighting Systems

Edge Lights

Lighting Aids PAPI-4L VASI-4L PAPI-4L PAPI-4L

Approach Lighting System MALSF MALSR MALSR MALSR

Centerline Lighting Systems None None None None

Runway Visibility Range (RVR) Yes Yes Yes Yes

Runway Instrument ApproachesRNAV,

VOR/DME

ILS, RNAV,

VOR/DME

ILS, RNAV,

VOR/DME

ILS, RNAV,

VOR/DME

3/4-Mile | 550' 1/2-Mile | 200' 3/4-Mile | ±200' 1/2-Mile | 200'

(A, B, C, D) (A, B, C, D, E) (A, B, C, D) (A, B, C, D, E)

High Intensity - HIRL High Intensity - HIRL (LED)

Instrument Minimums (Lowest)

Aircraft Categories

175,000 (Dual-DWG)

315,000 (Dual Tandem-DTWG)

PCN 41 F / A / X / T

315,000 (Dual Tandem-DTWG)

PCN (To Be Determined)

Asphalt-Concrete: Grooved Asphalt-Concrete: Grooved

Precision Precision

None None

None None

None None

N/A N/A

Class B Aircraft Class B Aircraft

10,301' x 150' 10,301' x 150'

20' Per Side - Paved 25' Per Side - Paved

Primary Primary

D - III (Less Than 150,000 Pounds) D - IV

TDG 3 TDG 5

PRIMARY RUNWAY SYSTEM

Facility Component

Existing Condition (2017) Future Condition (2037)

Runway 14/32 Runway 14/32

▪ FAA standard length is 1,000’

▪ Existing ROFA length limited to 715’ by airfield

perimeter roadway, perimeter fence, and Brett Way

Alternatives:

▪ Option A: FAA Modification of Standards (MOS)

▪ Option B: Declared Distances

▪ Option C: Relocate airfield perimeter roadway,

perimeter fence, and Brett Way

▪ Option D: Shorten Runway 14/32

Alternatives: Runway 14 ROFA

Option C (Preferred Option)

▪ Retains existing runway length of 10,301’

▪ Might require relocation of drainage channel

▪ FAA eligible projects

Alternatives: Runway 14 ROFA

▪ Oregon Air National Guard (OANG) requested and funded

▪ FAA installed

▪ Maintain existing visibility minimums not less than ¾ mile

▪ Components:

• Glide Slope (GS) antenna and equipment shelter

• Localizer antenna and equipment shelter

• Medium Intensity Approach Light System with Runway Alignment Indicator Lights

(MALSR)

Alternative: Runway 14 ILS

Option A

(East - Preferred)

Option B

(East)

Option C

(West)

Description • Side Band Reference

(SBR) GS Antenna

• Capture Effect Glide

Slope (CEGS) Antenna

• CEGS Antenna

Advantages • Shortest tower (21-26’)

• Smallest critical area

• Smallest grading reqs.

• No impact to USFS/GA

facilities

• Convenient hold bar

locations (Twy B/B1)

• Ready power source

from PAPI

• Minimal impact on LMT

operations

• USFS/GA non-

movement areas

outside of critical area

• Ready power source

• No ditches require

capping

• Ideal site for GS signal

quality due to paved

surface in critical area

Dis-advantages • SBR GS sensitive to

terrain roughness

• Ditch requires capping

• Part 77 Primary surface

penetration

• GS antenna in ROFA

• Coordination/memo

required with FAA ADO

for location within

ROFA

• No ready power source

• Two ditches require

capping

• Largest grading req.

• Complex hold line

design/locations

• Potential signal

interference with distant

terrain (5,000’) to north

• Part 77 Primary surface

penetration

• Complex hold line

design/locations

• Denies use of OANG

EOR apron during ILS

approaches

Runway 14 ILS GS Antenna Alternatives

▪ Existing 1,400’ MALSF nearing its useful life

span

▪ 2,400’ MALSR recommended to replace

▪ Addition property acquisition north of

Highway 140 required

Minimum

Property

Acquisition

MALSR

Runway 14 ILS MALSR

▪ Located 1,000’ south of Runway 32 end

▪ Critical area within perimeter road

▪ Requires continued practice of ATC

controlling vehicular traffic on perimeter

road into and out of the critical area

▪ Might require slight relocation of three

MALSR light stanchions

Runway 14 ILS Localizer Antenna

Facility Requirements: Runway 7/25

▪ Runway

Designation

▪ Reduced Runway

Dimensions

▪ Blast Pads

Future Runway 7/25 (5,000’ x 75’)

Master Plan Update

Taxiway System

Taxiway System

5 Areas of Non-Standard

Conditions

1) Taxiway A

2) Taxiway C

3) Taxiway E

4) Taxiway F/D

5) Taxiway H

Taxiway A and C

Taxiway A:

Direct Access, Angled Entry, Converge

with taxiway inside RSA, In future ILS

POFZ, Taxiway turn radius deficiency.

Taxiway C:

Direct access, Offset alignment with

B1, EOR operations

Taxiway E and G

Taxiway E:

▪ Numerous FAA Design Standards

Compliance

▪ Resolve by removing pavement

▪ Realign with Runway

▪ Option A preferred to facilitate alternate

runway crossing and reduce traffic

congestion at Taxiway D1/B1

▪ Runway connector renamed Taxiway G1

Taxiway F

Taxiway F:

▪ Two design groups

▪ Runway-Taxiway

separation

▪ Alignment with

runway ends

▪ Runup apron in

RSA

Taxiway F1

Taxiway F1:

▪ Alignment with

runway end

▪ Design group B-II

taxiway too wide

▪ Runup apron in

RSA

Taxiways F2 and H

Taxiway F2:

▪ Alignment with runway end

▪ Taxiway 35’ wide

Taxiway H:

▪ Direct access from apron to runway

Preferred Taxiway Layout

Master Plan Update

Landside Facilities

Eastside Building Area

▪ Hangar development

encouraged to occur

on East side first to

infill capacity.

▪ Meets T-hangars, mid-

sized hangars &

SASO facility forecast

demands

Westside Building Area

▪ AOB A preferred

▪ Extension to FBO 4-A

to improve reception

and services area.

▪ Designated Helicopter

parking

▪ Large/Turbine aircraft

operations separated

from Light aircraft

Master Plan Update

Oregon ANG Support Facilities

Options Explored

▪ Extend Crosswind Runway 7/25 (up to 8,000’) – Constrained

▪ Emergency Operations on Taxiway System – Not FAA Supported

▪ Construct New Parallel Runway (8,000’ x 150’) – In Progress

New Additional Runway

Crosswind Runway 7/25 Constraints

Additional Runway Concepts

* No preferred option selected in Master Plan.

EOR Concepts

B

CA

Building 400 Area

Preferred Concept

▪ Military facility expansion

▪ Non-aeronautical development

Master Plan Update

Non-Aeronautical Development

Airport Business Park

▪ Reduced Business Park footprint

▪ Enables GA hangar area

expansion

▪ Timing of transfer to aeronautical

use based on demand

Airport Entrance Road

▪ Option A: Swan Ct. connection

▪ Option B: Airport Way connection

▪ Option C: City 2012 alignment

LMT Road System

Schedule

Your Feedback

Next Steps

Schedule

PROJECT TASK

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

PLAN DELIVERABLES (WORKING PAPERS):

INVENTORY

FAA AGIS

FORECASTS

FAA APPROVAL

FACILITY REQUIREMENTS

ALTERNATIVES

FAA REVIEW #2

IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

(20-YEAR CIP)

AIRPORT LAYOUT PLAN

AND EXHIBIT 'A'FAA REVIEW

MEETINGS:

PUBLIC OUTREACH

MEETING EVENT

MASTER PLAN ADVISORY

COMMITTEE (MPAC)

CITY AND STAKEHOLDER

MEETINGS

MPAC = Master Plan Advisory Committee | WP = Working Paper | FAA = Federal Aviation Administration

Note: Scoped Meetings for 8 Airport Visits: MPAC = 6 | Airport Staff/City = 5 | Guard = 4 | County = 1 | Public Outreach = 1.

Note: Schedule accounts for typical review periods - some reviews are concurrent: Airport Sponsor = 3 Weeks | FAA = 4 to 6 Weeks | MPAC = 2 to 4 Weeks.

Note: Project schedule subject to change.

RWY 7/25 JUSTIFICATION FAA ACCEPTANCE

INITIAL ALT

Thursday, April 30, 2020

2018 2019 2020

AGIS FLIGHT & MAPPING

FAA

APPROVAL FAA REVIEW #2

D2

D5

D6 ALP

D1

#1

#5

#6

#2 #3 #4

D3 D3

D4

#6#1

#2 #4 #5#1 #3

D3 D3

D2

D4

Project Website: www.LMTMasterPlan.com

Public Comment Form

Thank You!

www.LMTMasterPlan.com